1 2 1 847 1201 1417 1 E-mail: onitsuka@nkg-net.co.jp 2 E-mail: hara@nkg-net.co.jp B. C. 150 3 3 Key Words: Yoshinogari burial mound, Chinese burial mounds, construction technique, Hanchiku, Sochiku, Taichiku 1. B. C. 150 14 B. C. 3. 5 B. C. 3. 0 1 2 B. C. 150 B. C. 150 2. 1 a 7 25m 1 2 621
1 1976 2001 73. 7ha38. 3ha 35. 4ha 3. 4km 40ha B. C. 150 30m 40m 2. 5m 4 5m b 14 3, 4, 5 2 a 2 a, 3 a 25m 10m 4 9 MH 52 68% 3 b 10 30cm 6,7, 8 JIS A1210 A 85 94% N 7 11 3 c 2 a b b 6, 7 8 1m 3 d 3. 1 c 5 622
3 a b c d 7 3. 4 11 200 2 5 c 14 6, 7, 8 10m 1 a B. C. 2. 5 B. C. 2. 0 9 623
5 7 6 10 4 11 CL 60 12, 13, 14 B. C. 3. 3 B. C. 2. 8 15 1. 3 16 B. C. 2. 0 B. C. 1. 5 5 hang tu hang zhu bang zhu 14, 17 1 2 3 3 b B. C. 4 6 Dui zhu 18 19, 20 14 624
8 3 c 21,22 7 14 14 2 3 8 4 13 3 625
9 10 11 20 4. 5m 4. 1 23 30 B. C. 1070 B. C. 221 23 9 10cm 1m 10 23, 24 29 8 10 260m 23 10 40m 2 7m 10 25 23, 25, 30 31, 32 B. C. 202 A. D. 220 350 345m 36m 626
13 12 40 50 8m a : b : 3 26, 27, 28 2 20m 20m 4. 5m 11 CL 22 26%93% N 6 14 40m 40m 50m 8m. 12 a 5 5. 0 6. 5m 1. 5m 3 12 b 10 15cm 3 5cm 5 5 CL 15 24% 90 94% N 8 18 40m 13 14, 28 627
15 14 8 5. 1 8 14 1, 14 10 50 3 31,32 12 3 4 5 6 7 8910 1112 2008 1 1 15 1 2 31, 32 3 4 628
1 16 5 6 7 CL 14 26 SF MH 52 68 3 8 9 90% 84 94 10 N 18 11 11 12 10 15cm 10 30cm 2 B. C. 1070 B. C. 221 629
17 B. C. 202 A. D. 220 B. C. 150 16 B. C. 108 4 33 36 33 20 30m 2 5m 17 3 B. C. 150 A. D. 221 A. D. 210 37, 38 39 8 8 630
6. B. C.1070 B. C. 221 B. C. 202 A. D. 220 B. C. 150 B. C. 108 B. C. 150 1993 1998 1) Onitsuka, K., Hara, Y., Lu, J., Tang, X. and Chen, P. : Roots in China of construction methods of ancient Yoshinogari burial mound, Proceedings of Special Session on Geo- Engineering for Conservation of Cultural Heritage and Historical Sites, 14AsianRegionalConference,ISSMGE, pp. 13 18, Hong Kong, China, 2011. 2) 1999. 3) 33 pp. 113 120, 1995. 4) Vol. 44, No. 7, pp. 19 22 1996. 5) No. 736/ III 63, pp. 217 230, 2003. 6) 1990. 7) 1992. 8) 2 2005. 9) Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 1 6, 1992. 10) Vol. 50, No. 9, pp. 25 27, 2002. 11) 2001. 12) Vol. 50, No. 5, pp. 26 28, 2002. 13) Chen P., Tong P., Vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 287 295, 2007. 14) pp. 141 148, 2008. 15) pp. 4 15, 1997 7. 16) pp. 1 14, 2000. 17) Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 15 17 2005. 18) 2000. 8. 19) V pp. 3 51 2003. 20) V pp. 149 193, 2003. 21) 5000 1998. 22) 1998. 23) 1998. 24) 4 pp. 36 40, 1990. 25) pp. 70 71, 1998. 26) Vol. 48, No. 8, pp. 20 22, 2000. 27) Vol. 50, No. 9, pp. 10 12, 2002. 28) Onitsuka, K., Lu, J., Tang, X., Hara, Y. and Kai, D. : Geotechnical characteristics and construction methods of 631
Yoshinogari fun kyu tomb in Japan and Tu dun tombs in China, J. Geotech. Eng., JSCE,No.736/III 63, pp. 1 17, 2003. 29) 2005 pp. 85 89, 2005. 30) pp. 83 85, 1998. 31) 2002 2002. 32) 2005 pp. 110 114, 2005. 33) 8 3 9 1982. 34) 5 1996. 35) (10) 2000. 36) I(1) pp. 33 62, 2001. 37) 1995. 38) 2008. 10. 39) pp. 115 116, 1998. 2011. 11. 11 ROOTS OF CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUE OF ANCIENT YOSHINOGARI BURIAL MOUND AND ITS PROPAGATION Katsutada ONITSUKA and Yutaka HARA The ancient Yoshinogari burial mound (about B. C. 150) is the oldest large earth fill which is mainly constructed by Sochiku method. The construction technique of earth fill is classified as Taichiku, Sochiku and Hanchiku in the order from the lowest to the highest level. The Chinese burial mounds, namely Jiangnan burial mounds (B. C. 1, 070 - B. C. 221) and Shandong Peninsula burial mounds (B. C. 202 - A. D. 220) and Yoshinogari burial mound are compared on various actual conditions such as the application of three construction techniques to the mounds and the location of burial matters in the mounds. Considering also the roots and propagations of other cultures and techniques, it is concluded that the construction technique of Jiangnan burial mounds propagated to the Shandong Peninsula burial mounds, and that the technique of Jiangnan or Shandong Peninsula burial mounds propagated to Yoshinogari, in northern Kyushu, Japan, through the sea, not through the Korean Peninsula. 632