1 15 45 2 2-3 16 150 215 185 254 310 398 1 Men and Women in Early Christianity Early Christian Centuries Conference 2013 The Relation between male and female in Alexandrian Exegetical Tradition 2 Albert Henrichs, Philosophy, the Handmaiden of Theology, Greek Roman and Byzantine Studies 9, 1968, pp. 437-450, 3 ancilla theologiae 29 2011 29-54 Miyako Demura, Origen and the Exegetical Tradition of the Sarah - Hagar Motif in Alexandria, Studia Patristica LVI, 2013, Peeters, pp. 73-81 13
1 3 1970 Richard Baer Philo s Use of the Categories Male and Female Baer 4 5 De opificio mundi 151-5 3 Richard A. Baer, JR., Philo s Use of the Categories Male and Female, Leiden, 1970, p.40, K.L. Gaca, Philo s Principles of Sexual Conduct and their Influence on Christian Platonic Sexual Principles, The Studia Philonica Annual 8, 1996, pp. 21-39, David Winston, Philo and the Rabbis on Sex and the Body in Poetics Today 19, 1998, pp. 41-62, D. Sly, Philo s Perception of Women, BJS 209, Atlanta : Scholars Press, 1990, J. Kugel, Tradition of the Bible : a Guide to the Bible as it was at the Start of the Common Era, Cambridge Mass. - London : Harvard University Press, 1998, pp. 100-102. 4 Baer ; lifeless, diseased, enslaved ; unmanly, nerveless, effeminate ; mean, slavish ; sluggish ; accustomed to be deceived, akin to bestial passions ; vice, passion ; injustice of the multitudes ; vain opinions ; softness, death, everything vile, the more imperfect and ignoble element, transgressions and lawlessness, beginning of evil, depravity, night, darkness, a mixed mass ; takes pleasure in being a knave Baer, p. 42. 5 Baer, p. 40. 14
2-3 6 Quaestiones et Solutiones in Genesin 3 6 7 Cristina Termini 8 Termini 6 Philo, De opificio mundi 151-5, English translation by F.H. Colson and G.H. Whitaker, LCL, 1981, pp. 118-123. D.T. Runia, Philo of Alexandria : On the Creation of the Cosmos according to Moses, Leiden, Boston and Köln, 2001 7 Philo, Quaestiones et Solutiones in Genesin Ralph Marcus, LCL, 1979, p. 22. 8 Cristina Termini, Philo s Thought within the Context of Middle Judaism in Adam Kamesar ed., The Cambridge Companion to Philo, 2009, p. 104. 15
μέτριοs Termini 9 Boyarin 10 25 : 24 2 : 13-14 11 μέτριοs 16 2 16 De Congressu eruditionis gratia 9 Termini, p. 105. 10 D. Boyarin, Carnal Israel : Reading Sex in Talmudic Culture, Berkeley : University of California Press, 1993, p. 81. Runia p. 361 11 James L. Kugel, Traditions of the Bible, Harvard University Press, 1998, pp. 94-103 16
Adam Kamsar 12 13 79 14 15 12 Kamsar, Biblical Interpretation in Philo, in Adam Kamesar ed., The Cambridge Companion to Philo, 2009, p. 85. 13 Kamsar, p. 86. 14 Philo, De Congressu eruditionis gratia 79 English translation by F.H. Colson and G.H. Whitaker, LCL, 1985, pp. 496-7. Cf. Analytical Introduction, pp. 451-457. 15 A. Henrichs, p. 444 17
polygamy 16 17 180 3 I.30 2-3 2 : 21-3 : 6 18 Van Den Hoek 16 The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece & Rome 4, Oxford, 2010, pp. 350-358 17 A. Henrichs, pp. 437-50 ; Alan Mendelson, Secular Education in Philo of Alexandria, Hebrew Union College Press, Cincinnati, 1982 ; H.I. Marrou, A History of Education in Antiquity, London, 1982, pp. 406-408. 18 2 : 21 Biblia Patristica ; Des origins à Clément d Alexandrie et Tertullien, 1975 1 Annewies van den Hoek, Clement of Alexandria and his use of Philo in the Stromateis : an Early Christian Reshaping of a Jewish Model, Brill, 1988 ; David T. Runia, Philo in Early Christian Literature A Survey, Van Gorcum : Fortress Press, 1993 18
Stromateis 19 20 I 30 21 Van Den Hoek 4 22 23 4 24 19 Annewies Van Den Hoek, Clement of Alexandria and his Use of Philo, p. 23 20 p. 24. 21 p. 31. 22 Runia, Philo in Early Christian Literature, p. 132 p. 135. 23 Van Den Hoek, p. 217. 24 Miyako Demura, The Reception of the Pauline Letters and the Formation of the Canonical Principle in 19
1 : 23-28 I, 14 I, 15 1 I, 14 1 : 27-28 25 1, 15 Origen of Alexandria, Scrinium 6 : Patrologia Pacifica Secunda, 2010, pp. 75-84. 25 homilist 31 2013 19-39 20
26 V, 1, 12-14 2 : 14 5 : 12 V. 1, 12 13 14 27 2 : 14 28 26 5 : 23 8 : 3-16 5 : 16-26 H. Crouzel, Origen The Life and Thought of the First Great Theologian, Harper & Row, 1989, pp. 87-92 27 Origen, Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans, English translation by Thomas P. Scheck, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 309-311. 28 5 : 12-14 15 : 45-49 21
16 4 : 21-27 29 4 : 21-24 30 De principiis IV. 2, 6 ἀλληγορούμενα 31 ἀλληγορούμενα ἀλληγορούμενα Hexapla 29 See Miyako Demura, Origen and the Exegetical Tradition of the Sarah - Hagar Motif in Alexandria, Studia Patristica LVI, 2013, Peeters, pp. 73-81. 30 See Miyako Demura, Origen as Biblical Scholar in his Commentary on the Gospel according to Matthew XII, 29, Scrinium 4 Patrologia Pacifica, 2008, pp. 23-31. 31 Origène, Traité des Principes IV, Commentaire et Fragments par H. Crouzel et M. Simonetti, SC, 1980. 22
32 5 1 : 27 1 : 26-27 ὁμοούσιον κατ εἰκόνα θεοῦ κατ ἀναγωγὴν 33 34 16 : 1-2 ἡ τελεία ἀρετὴ καὶ φιλοσοφία ἡ τελεία ἀρετὴ καὶ πνευματική 32 Miyako Demura, Origen s allegorical interpretation and the Philological tradition of Alexandria, in Origeniana Nona, 2009, Leuven, pp. 149-158. 33 Didyme L Aveugle, Sur La Genèse Tom II par Pierre Nautin, SC244, 1978, pp. 158-159. 34 E. Lamirande, Le masculin et le feminine dans la tradition alexandrine : le commentaire de Didymus l Aveugle sur la Genèse, Science et Esprit 41, 1989, pp. 137-165 23
τὰ προγυμνάσματα 35 ἡ σκία 36 235.25-236.11 37 38 39 4 40 ζηλοτυπία ἀφθονία ἀπάθεια σοφή ἁγία 35 9 36 10 1 37 Didyme L Aveugle, pp. 202-205. Runia, Philo in Early Christian Literature, p. 202 38 Runia, p. 202. 39 Runia, p. 201. 40 4 Elizabeth E. Clark, The Origenist Controversy, Princeton University Press, 1992, 20 24
σωφροςύνη ἀφθονία ἀπάθεια 235.17-24 41 4 : 24 41 Didyme L Aveugle, pp. 202-203. 25
26