shuron.dvi
|
|
- いつや こうい
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 01M3065
2 A 34 1
3 Diamond
4 4 3 3
5 ) : 12 P.13 1) 4
6 % 18% % 16.5% %
7 % 20% 5% % 20% 6
8 2 20% 6% 26% 5% 20% % 20% 18% 7
9 2 2.1 Dynasty Model 1928 Ramsey Overlapping Generations Model) 2 Diamond(1965) Diamond Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) Auerbach and Kotlikoff cobb-dagulas Branchard and Fisher (1989) Azariadis(1993) Summers(1981) Chamely and Wright(1987) 8
10 2.2 Diamond(1965) 1) 2.1 t t +1 t +2 t +1 t +2 t +1 t t +1 t +2 t +3 1 C y,t C o,t+1 2 C y,t+1 C o,t+2 3 C y,t+2 C o,t+3 2.1: w t s t c y,t r t+1 c o,t+1 t c y,t = w t s t (2.1) c o,t+1 = (1+r t+1 )s t (2.2) 1) Diamond(1965) 9
11 (2.1) (2.2) c y,t + c o,t+1 1+r t+1 = w t (2.3) u t = u(c y,t,c o,t+1 ) (2.4) u t (2.4) (2.3) w t r t+1 u u =(1+r t+1 ) (2.5) c y,t c o,t+1 (2.5) (2.5) (2.1) s t = s(w t,r t+1 ) (2.6) K t L t Y t = F(K t,l t ) (2.7) Y t n L t =(1+n)L t 1 (2.8) (2.7) L t y t = f(k t ) (2.9) 10
12 y t k t = K t /L t f (k t+1 )=r t+1 (2.10) w t = f(k t ) f (k t )k t (2.11) (2.10) (2.11) (2.10) (2.11) w t r t w(r t ) 2) s t L t = K t+1 s t = 1 1+n k t+1 (2.12) 2 3) steady state (2.6) (2.10) (2.11) (2.12) k t+1 = 1 1+n s[f(k t) f (k t )k t,f (k t+1 )] = φ(k t ) (2.13) (2.13) uniqueness globally Ihori(1996) 4) 2) w(r t ) lim k 0 φ (k t ) > 0 lim f (k t )=0 k φ (k) 0 for all k > 0 3) (2.12) 4) k t+1 = φ(k t ) φ (k) 0 for all k > 0 ds 0 for all (w,r) 0 dr 11
13 0 <φ < 1 (2.14)
14 3 3.1 c yt+1 c o,t+1 U t (3.1) U t = ( 1 c 1 1/γ y,t + 1 ) 1 1/γ 1+δ c1 1/γ o,t+1 (3.1) (3.1) γ δ 0 <γ<1 δ >0 s t =(1 ω)w t + g (1 + θ t )c y,t (3.2) s t t w t t g ω θ t t (3.2) 13
15 s t = 1+θ t+1 1+(1 ρ)r t+1 c o,t+1 (3.3) r t+1 t +1 ρ θ t+1 t +1 (3.3) (3.2) (3.3) (1 ω)w t + g =(1+θ t )c y,t + (3.4) t 1+θ t+1 1+(1 ρ)r t+1 c o,t+1 (3.4) (3.4) (3.1) L = 1 1 1/γ +λ ( c 1 1/γ y,t + 1 ) 1+δ c1 1/γ o,t+1 { (1 ω)w t + g (1 + θ t )c y,t (3.5) } 1+θ t+1 c 1+(1 ρ)r o,t+1 t+1 (3.5) L = c 1/γ y,t λ (1 + θ t ) (3.6) c y,t L c o,t+1 = 1 1+δ c 1/γ o,t λ ( 1+θ t+1 1+(1 ρ)r t+1 L λ = (1 ω)w t + g (1 + θ t )c y,t ) (3.7) 1+θ t+1 1+(1 ρ)r t+1 c o,t+1 (3.8) (3.9) (3.6) (3.7) λ λ = c 1/γ y,t 1+θ t (3.10) λ = 1+(1 ρ)r t+1 (1 + θ t+1 )(1 + δ) c o,t+1 (3.11) 14
16 (3.10) (3.11) ( ) γ ( ) 1+θt 1+(1 γ ρ)rt+1 c o,t+1 = c y,t (3.12) 1+θ t+1 1+δ (3.12) (3.4) c y,t (1 + θ t+1 ) γ 1 (1 + θ t ) 1 (1 + δ) γ {(1 ω)w t + g} c y,t = (1 + θ t+1 ) (γ 1) (1 + δ) γ +(1+θ t ) γ 1 (1 + (1 ρ)r t+1 ) γ 1 (3.13) (3.13) (3.2) s t = {(1 ω)w t + g}(1 + θ t ) γ 1 (1 + δ) γ (1 + θ t+1 ) γ 1 +(1+θ t ) γ 1 {1+(1 ρ)r t+1 } γ 1 (3.14) 3.2 K t L t cobb-douglas α 0 <α<1 Y t = K α t L1 α t (3.15) Π n Π=Y t w t L t r t K t (3.16) L t+1 =(1+n)L t (3.17) (3.15) (3.16) L t (3.15) L t Y t L t = Kα t L t L t L α t (3.18) 15
17 (3.18) y t = k α t (3.19) y t k t (3.15) f(0) = 0 f ( ) = 0 f (0) = L t (3.16) L t π = y t w t r t k t (3.20) π (3.20) y t w t r r k t (3.21) (3.20) (3.19) k α t w t r t k t = 0 (3.22) (3.22) k t r t = αk α 1 t (3.23) w t = (1 α)k α t (3.24) 16
18 (3.23) (3.24) 3.3 TR ω ρ c 1,t τ c L t c 2,t τ c L t 1 L t TR = ωw t L t + ρr t K t + θ t c y,t L t + θ t c o,t L t 1 gl t (3.25) (3.25) 1 L t tr = ωw t + ρr t k t + θ t c y,t + θ tc o,t 1+n g (3.26) 3.4 K t+1 = s t L t (3.27) (3.27) t +1 t (3.27) L t 17
19 k t+1 = 1 1+n s t (3.28) (3.14) (3.23) (3.24) s t = (1 + θ t ) γ 1 {(1 ω)(1 α)kt α + g} (1 + δ) γ (1 + θ γ 1 t+1 +(1+θ t) { γ 1 1+αkt+1 α 1(1 ρ)} γ 1 (3.29) (3.28) (3.29) k t+1 = 1 1+n (1 + θ t ) γ 1 {(1 ω)(1 α)k α t + g} (1 + δ) γ ( 1+θt+1 1+θ t ) γ 1 + { 1+αk α 1 t+1 (1 ρ)} γ 1 (3.30) (3.30) 3.5 (3.30) k t,k t+1 1) (3.30) k t+1 k t t t +1 dk t+1 dk t = (1 + n) 1 α(1 + θ t ) γ 1 (1 α)k α 1 (1 + δ) γ + X γ 1 +(γ 1)X γ 2 (1 ρ)α(α 1)k α 2 (3.31) X =1+(1 ρ)r dk t+1 /dk t 0 1 dk t+1 /dk t dk t+1 /dk t > 0 dk t+1 /dk t < 1 1) 18
20 4 k ρ dk dρ = (1 + θ t ) γ 1 X γ 1 αk α 1 (1 + δ) γ + X γ 1 +(γ 1)X γ 2 (1 ρ)(α 1)αk α 2 (1 ω)(1 α)αk α 1(3.32) (3.32) dk/dρ < 0 k ω dk dω = (1 + θ t ) γ 1 (1 α)k α (1 + δ) γ + X γ 1 +(γ 1)X γ 2 (1 ρ)(α 1)αk α 2 (1 ω)(1 α)αk α 1(3.33) 4 19
21 : α % δ % γ % g 0.03 n 0.01 α α =0.5 α =0.4 1) δ 1 40 δ =1.0 γ t t +1 1)
22 (2002) 9.0 % g0.03 2) 20.0 % 5.0 % (3.30) k t k t k t k t+1 4.1: 2) (2002)P.9 21
23 4.2 E k t k t+1 E k E :
24 4.3 ω ρ (3.33) (3.32) 4.2: 4.2 5%
25 : 4.3 5%
26 α α α 4.4: (α ) 4.5: (α ) 25
27 α 4.6: (α ) 4.7: (α ) α cobb-douglas 26
28 δ δ 4.8: (δ ) 4.9: (δ ) 27
29 4.10: (δ ) 4.11: (δ ) δ δ 28
30 γ γ 4.12: (γ ) 4.13: (γ ) γ 29
31 4.14: (γ ) 4.15: (γ ) γ α δ γ
32 CaseA 20% 25% CaseB 20% 15% CaseC 20% 25% CaseD 20% 15% 4.3: CaseA CaseB CaseC CaseD CaseA CaseB CaseA 9.0% 5.5% 39.2% 3.83% 2.23% 1.51% 3.29% 7.69% 31
33 CaseB 9.0% 12.4% 37.9% 3.69% 2.28% 1.49% 3.18% 8.37% CaseC CaseD CaseC 5.0% 2.9% 42.3% 1.2% 0.76% 0.5% 2.3% 5.5% CaseD 5.0% 7.3% 46.0% 1.23% 0.73% 0.49% 2.67% 6.85% 4.6 Lucas(1990) Lucas 30% (2001) Lucas(1990) 10% 32
34 Lucas 36%
35 A (3.30) ( (1 + δ) γ + { 1+αk α 1 t+1 (1 ρ)} γ 1 ) k t+1 =(1+θ t ) γ 1 {(1 ω)(1 α)k α t + g} { (1 + δ) γ + X γ 1 +(γ 1)X γ 2 (1 ρ)(α 1)αk α 2 t+1 } dk t+1 =(1+θ t ) γ 1 (1 ω)(1 α)αkt α 1 dk t dk t dk t+1 dk t = (1 + θ t ) γ 1 (1 ω)(1 α)αk α 1 (1 + δ) γ + X γ 1 +(γ 1)X γ 2 (1 ρ)(α 1)αk α 2 k 0 <dk t+1 /dk t <
36 [1] A.J.Auerbach and L.J.Kotlikoff(1987), Dynamic fiscal policy, Cambridge University Press. [2] C.Azariadis(1993), Intertemporal Macroeconomics, Blackwell. [3] G.T.McCandless,Jr.,and N.Wallace(1991), Introduction to dynamic macroeconomic theory, Harvard University Press. [4] Ch.Chamley and B.Wright(1987), Fiscal Incidence in Overlapping Generations Model with a Fixed Asset, Journal of Public Economics, Vol.32 [5] J.B.Shoven and J.Whalley(1992), Applying General Equilibrium, Cambridge University Press. [6] L.H.Summers(1981), Capital Taxation and Accumulation in a Life Cycle Growth Model, The American Economic Review, Vol. 71(4) [7] O.J.Branchard and S.Fischer(1989),Lectures on Macroeconomics, MIT Press. [8] P.A.Diamond(1965), National dept in a neoclassical growth model, The American Economic Reviwe, Vol. 55(5) [9] R.Lucas,Jr(1990), Supply-side economics: An analytical review,oxford Economic papers,vol.42,no.2. [10] T.Ihori(1996), Public Finance in an Overlapping Generation Economy, Macmillan Press. [11] (1991),,. 35
37 [12] (2002), 14,. [13] (1996),,. [14] (1989),,. [15] (2001),,, Vol.52,No.1. [16] (2002), 14,. [17] (2001), 11,. [18] (1994), - -. [19] (1998),,. [20] (2002), [21] (1987,,. 36
Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,
,, 2010 8 24 2010 9 14 A B C A (B Negishi(1960) (C) ( 22 3 27 ) E-mail:fujii@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:082e527e@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:iritani@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1 1 2 3 Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987)
More information(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)
,, 23 4 30 (i) (ii) (i) (ii) Negishi (1960) 2010 (2010) ( ) ( ) (2010) E-mail:fujii@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:082e527e@stu.kobe-u.ac.jp E-mail:iritani@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1 16 (2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987)
More information2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1
2015 : 27 6 13 1 (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1947) 2 Samuelson(1958) 3 OLG Solow Ramsey Samuelson
More informationTitle 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL
Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue 2012-06 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/23085 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository
More information2017 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 exante (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Al
2017 : 29 5 24 1 (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 exante (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1947) 2 Samuelson(1958) 3 OLG Solow Ramsey 1
More informationp *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2
2013 1 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 2013 4 11 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem : Jordan : 1 investment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 *1 *1 93SNA 1 p.180 1936 100 1970 *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian
More informationMasahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89
89 102 Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89 ( )IS LM Keynes Hicks IS LM Phillips stylized fact ( ) ( ) 90 Keynes 3 superneutrality 4 RBC 2 1 (i) (ii) (a) (b) (c) 3 Keynes 91 Walras Keynes Say s law
More informationGraduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr
Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina 2009 1. はじめに Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Tax Competition
More informationuntitled
2000 (1257) 2001 (1504) 2002 (1427) 2003 (1948) 2004 (2872) 2005 (2424) 2006 (1765) Case1A Case1B Case2A Case2B Case3A Case3B or \ \ \ \
More informationPFI
PFI 23 3 3 PFI PFI 1 1 2 3 2.1................................. 3 2.2..................... 4 2.3.......................... 5 3 7 3.1................................ 7 3.2.................................
More information財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察
1998 1999 1998 1999 10 10 1999 30 (1982, 1996) (1997) (1977) (1990) (1996) (1997) (1996) Ihori, Doi, and Kondo (1999) (1982) (1984) (1987) (1993) (1997) (1998) CAPM 1980 (time inconsistency) Persson, Persson
More information# GDP 1 GDP 1992 GDP Hamilton and Flavin (1986) Doi and Ihori(2003) (2007) 2 Bohn(1998) /GDP Bohn # 1 2 Broda
# masaya@econ.keio.ac.jp GDP 1 GDP 1992 GDP 1 2006 Hamilon and Flavin (1986) Doi and Ihori(2003) 1965 2003 (2007) 2 Bohn(1998) /GDP Bohn # 1 2 Broda and Weinsein (2005) (2007) 1 Hamilon and Flavin(1986)
More informationPublic Investment, the Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy Economic Growth Pioneering Economic Theory Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth Review of Economic Studiesvol.27 Econometrica vol.34
More informationCOE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho
COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate School of Economics and Institute of Economic Research
More informationJorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C
27 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 27 4 3 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem Jordan Saddle Path. GDP % GDP 2. 3. 4.. Tobin q 2 2. Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F
More informationLLG-R8.Nisus.pdf
d M d t = γ M H + α M d M d t M γ [ 1/ ( Oe sec) ] α γ γ = gµ B h g g µ B h / π γ g = γ = 1.76 10 [ 7 1/ ( Oe sec) ] α α = λ γ λ λ λ α γ α α H α = γ H ω ω H α α H K K H K / M 1 1 > 0 α 1 M > 0 γ α γ =
More informationAutumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ
212 Vol. 44 No. 2 I はじめに 2008 1 2 Autumn 08 213 II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 17 18 1 分析に用いるデータ 1 2005 10 12 200 2 2006 9 12 1 1 2 129 35 113 3 1 2 6 1 2 3 4 4 1
More informationO x y z O ( O ) O (O ) 3 x y z O O x v t = t = 0 ( 1 ) O t = 0 c t r = ct P (x, y, z) r 2 = x 2 + y 2 + z 2 (t, x, y, z) (ct) 2 x 2 y 2 z 2 = 0
9 O y O ( O ) O (O ) 3 y O O v t = t = 0 ( ) O t = 0 t r = t P (, y, ) r = + y + (t,, y, ) (t) y = 0 () ( )O O t (t ) y = 0 () (t) y = (t ) y = 0 (3) O O v O O v O O O y y O O v P(, y,, t) t (, y,, t )
More information1 (2005) (2004) (2005) (2006) 1: (2007) 2 2 2: Auerbach, Gokhale and Kotlikoff(1991) Gokhale (2005)
3 1 2 (2007) 3 3 1 2 3 2 1 2 JEL H55 Key words public pension social security subsidy general accounts sustainability generational accounts 1 2004 2000 2009 3 1 2 1 65 ecms1019@kwansei.ac.jp 1 1 (2005)
More informationConstitution State colonies Provisions State Nutmeg State Land of Steady Habits Quinnehtukqut Quinnihtukqut Nautilus American Turtle Yankee Omi Omi Shonin Edo The Theory of Environmental Policy A Listing
More information重力方向に基づくコントローラの向き決定方法
( ) 2/Sep 09 1 ( ) ( ) 3 2 X w, Y w, Z w +X w = +Y w = +Z w = 1 X c, Y c, Z c X c, Y c, Z c X w, Y w, Z w Y c Z c X c 1: X c, Y c, Z c Kentaro Yamaguchi@bandainamcogames.co.jp 1 M M v 0, v 1, v 2 v 0 v
More informationuntitled
* 2001 (B) ** 113-0033 7-3-1 TEL(03)5841-5641FAX(03)5841-5521iwamoto@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp 1990 1990 1 2 3 1 (2002) 2 social infrastructure social capital Woolcook (1998) 3-1 - - 2 - 1990 Mera (1973) G Cobb-Douglas
More information1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199
Nelson-Siegel Nelson-Siegel 1992 2007 15 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 2 FF VAR 1996 FF B) 1 Nelson-Siegel 15 90 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel
More information財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察
000 364 645 (ax smoohing (Barro(979 Barro(979 (consumpion smoohing Hall(978 Campbell(987 Barro(979 Hall(978 Campbell(987 Campbell(987 B ( r B G T ( ( r E B G T Y T/Y r ( No Ponzi Game ( [ Ω ] Y ( lim (
More information20 4 20 i 1 1 1.1............................ 1 1.2............................ 4 2 11 2.1................... 11 2.2......................... 11 2.3....................... 19 3 25 3.1.............................
More information_07.indd
中央大学経済研究所年報第 45 号 (2014)pp.143-160 2014 金融政策とタイム ラグ ( 浅田 松本 ) 143 非線形経済理論研究会 In this paper, we study how the time lag that is related to the monetary policy influences on dynamic stability of the macroeconomic
More informationTOP URL 1
TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc.com/ 3.............................. 3.............................. 4.3 4................... 5.4........................ 6.5........................ 8.6...........................7
More informationアジ研教科書「マクロ安定化」.PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Corbo, V., and S. Fischer, Structural Adjustment, Stabilization and Policy Reform: Domestic and International Finance, in J. Behrman and T. N. Srinivasan, eds., Handbook of Development
More information振動工学に基礎
Ky Words. ω. ω.3 osω snω.4 ω snω ω osω.5 .6 ω osω snω.7 ω ω ( sn( ω φ.7 ( ω os( ω φ.8 ω ( ω sn( ω φ.9 ω anφ / ω ω φ ω T ω T s π T π. ω Hz ω. T π π rad/s π ω π T. T ω φ 6. 6. 4. 4... -... -. -4. -4. -6.
More informationGmech08.dvi
63 6 6.1 6.1.1 v = v 0 =v 0x,v 0y, 0) t =0 x 0,y 0, 0) t x x 0 + v 0x t v x v 0x = y = y 0 + v 0y t, v = v y = v 0y 6.1) z 0 0 v z yv z zv y zv x xv z xv y yv x = 0 0 x 0 v 0y y 0 v 0x 6.) 6.) 6.1) 6.)
More informationLA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)
LA-VAR 1 1 1973 4 2000 4 Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2) E-mail b1215@yamaguchi-u.ac.jp 2 Toda, Hiro Y. and Yamamoto,T.(1995) 3
More information21 2 26 i 1 1 1.1............................ 1 1.2............................ 3 2 9 2.1................... 9 2.2.......... 9 2.3................... 11 2.4....................... 12 3 15 3.1..........
More information1 (Berry,1975) 2-6 p (S πr 2 )p πr 2 p 2πRγ p p = 2γ R (2.5).1-1 : : : : ( ).2 α, β α, β () X S = X X α X β (.1) 1 2
2005 9/8-11 2 2.2 ( 2-5) γ ( ) γ cos θ 2πr πρhr 2 g h = 2γ cos θ ρgr (2.1) γ = ρgrh (2.2) 2 cos θ θ cos θ = 1 (2.2) γ = 1 ρgrh (2.) 2 2. p p ρgh p ( ) p p = p ρgh (2.) h p p = 2γ r 1 1 (Berry,1975) 2-6
More informationPublic Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerab
Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerable amount of research, which has noted an ability distribution.
More informationGmech08.dvi
51 5 5.1 5.1.1 P r P z θ P P P z e r e, z ) r, θ, ) 5.1 z r e θ,, z r, θ, = r sin θ cos = r sin θ sin 5.1) e θ e z = r cos θ r, θ, 5.1: 0 r
More informationUntitled
II 14 14-7-8 8/4 II (http://www.damp.tottori-u.ac.jp/~ooshida/edu/fluid/) [ (3.4)] Navier Stokes [ 6/ ] Navier Stokes 3 [ ] Reynolds [ (4.6), (45.8)] [ p.186] Navier Stokes I 1 balance law t (ρv i )+ j
More information(1987) (1990) (1991) (1996) (1998) (1999) (2000) (2001) (2002) 3 ( ) ( ) hkyo
(987) (990) (99) (996) (998) (999) (2000) (200) (2002) 3 ( ) ( ) kiaurayohiaki@rv.econ.oaka-u.ac.jp KimuraShin@rv.econ.oaka-u.ac.jp hkyoji@ipcku.kanai-u.ac.jp 2 3 4 5 2 2. j 2 N 23 59 60 80 37 37 38 58
More information1: 3.3 1/8000 1/ m m/s v = 2kT/m = 2RT/M k R 8.31 J/(K mole) M 18 g 1 5 a v t πa 2 vt kg (
1905 1 1.1 0.05 mm 1 µm 2 1 1 2004 21 2004 7 21 2005 web 2 [1, 2] 1 1: 3.3 1/8000 1/30 3 10 10 m 3 500 m/s 4 1 10 19 5 6 7 1.2 3 4 v = 2kT/m = 2RT/M k R 8.31 J/(K mole) M 18 g 1 5 a v t πa 2 vt 6 6 10
More informationMicrosoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC
90 ª ª * E-mailshinobu.nakagawa@boj.or.jp i ii iii iv SNA 1 70 80 2 80 90 80 80 90 1 80 90 98 6 1 1 SNA 2 1 SNA 80 1SNA 1 19931998 1 2-190 1,2 2 2-2 2-3,4 3 2-5 4 2030 2-3 3 2-15 97 20 90 2-15 9198 1.
More informationxia2.dvi
Journal of Differential Equations 96 (992), 70-84 Melnikov method and transversal homoclinic points in the restricted three-body problem Zhihong Xia Department of Mathematics, Harvard University Cambridge,
More informationuntitled
106 62 2 106 62 2...1...3...3...5...7...9...10...14...14...15...16 I...18...18...20 II...25...25 ...32 F...33...34 (*) 1960 1970 1970 * 1 2 3 The Ricardian Equivalence Theorem Barro(1974) 1 1 2 y 0 y
More informationWinter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003
266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2
More informationN/m f x x L dl U 1 du = T ds pdv + fdl (2.1)
23 2 2.1 10 5 6 N/m 2 2.1.1 f x x L dl U 1 du = T ds pdv + fdl (2.1) 24 2 dv = 0 dl ( ) U f = T L p,t ( ) S L p,t (2.2) 2 ( ) ( ) S f = L T p,t p,l (2.3) ( ) U f = L p,t + T ( ) f T p,l (2.4) 1 f e ( U/
More informationarxiv: v1(astro-ph.co)
arxiv:1311.0281v1(astro-ph.co) R µν 1 2 Rg µν + Λg µν = 8πG c 4 T µν Λ f(r) R f(r) Galileon φ(t) Massive Gravity etc... Action S = d 4 x g (L GG + L m ) L GG = K(φ,X) G 3 (φ,x)φ + G 4 (φ,x)r + G 4X (φ)
More informationglobal imbalances ) * 1
global imbalances 2 3 45 6 1) * 1 68 53 Denison 1958 2 Denison 1958 Feldstein and Fane 1973 1946 1968 Feldstein 19731978 David and Scadding 1974Furstenberg 1981Pitelis 1987 Poterba 1986 1948 1986 Bhatia
More information1. z dr er r sinθ dϕ eϕ r dθ eθ dr θ dr dθ r x 0 ϕ r sinθ dϕ r sinθ dϕ y dr dr er r dθ eθ r sinθ dϕ eϕ 2. (r, θ, φ) 2 dr 1 h r dr 1 e r h θ dθ 1 e θ h
IB IIA 1 1 r, θ, φ 1 (r, θ, φ)., r, θ, φ 0 r
More information64 3 g=9.85 m/s 2 g=9.791 m/s 2 36, km ( ) 1 () 2 () m/s : : a) b) kg/m kg/m k
63 3 Section 3.1 g 3.1 3.1: : 64 3 g=9.85 m/s 2 g=9.791 m/s 2 36, km ( ) 1 () 2 () 3 9.8 m/s 2 3.2 3.2: : a) b) 5 15 4 1 1. 1 3 14. 1 3 kg/m 3 2 3.3 1 3 5.8 1 3 kg/m 3 3 2.65 1 3 kg/m 3 4 6 m 3.1. 65 5
More information02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j
X-12-ARIMA Band-PassDECOMP HP X-12-ARIMADECOMP HPBeveridge and Nelson DECOMP X-12-ARIMA Band-PassHodrick and PrescottHP DECOMPBeveridge and Nelson M CD X ARIMA DECOMP HP Band-PassDECOMP Kiyotaki and Moore
More informationbottleneckjapanese.dvi
1 M&A Keywords:,. Address: 742-1, Higashinakano, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 192-09,Japan fax:+81 426 74 425 E-mail: yangc@tamacc.chuo-u.ac.jp ; yasuokaw@tamacc.chuo-u.ac.jp 1 Yang and Kawashima(2008) 1 2 ( MVI
More informationGmech08.dvi
145 13 13.1 13.1.1 0 m mg S 13.1 F 13.1 F /m S F F 13.1 F mg S F F mg 13.1: m d2 r 2 = F + F = 0 (13.1) 146 13 F = F (13.2) S S S S S P r S P r r = r 0 + r (13.3) r 0 S S m d2 r 2 = F (13.4) (13.3) d 2
More information12056286_03.indd
: 82 1 2013 7 2010 2011 1 30 2010 30 2011 30 2010 9 10 11 2011 1 2 1 2010 9 UK UK UK UK UK p. 843 45 82 1 1 UK 9 9 2007-08 UK 30% 30 20%30 150 30 32.5% 2030% p. 843 3 2004-05 5% 5% 75% p. 843 2010 11 1963
More information研究シリーズ第40号
165 PEN WPI CPI WAGE IIP Feige and Pearce 166 167 168 169 Vector Autoregression n (z) z z p p p zt = φ1zt 1 + φ2zt 2 + + φ pzt p + t Cov( 0 ε t, ε t j )= Σ for for j 0 j = 0 Cov( ε t, zt j ) = 0 j = >
More information.2 ρ dv dt = ρk grad p + 3 η grad (divv) + η 2 v.3 divh = 0, rote + c H t = 0 dive = ρ, H = 0, E = ρ, roth c E t = c ρv E + H c t = 0 H c E t = c ρv T
NHK 204 2 0 203 2 24 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 25 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 26 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 27 ( ) 7 00 7 50 I. ( ν R n 2 ) m 2 n m, R = e 2 8πε 0 hca B =.09737 0 7 m ( ν = ) λ a B = 4πε 0ħ 2 m e e 2 = 5.2977
More informationTOP URL 1
TOP URL http://amonphys.web.fc.com/ 1 19 3 19.1................... 3 19.............................. 4 19.3............................... 6 19.4.............................. 8 19.5.............................
More information遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』
2-1. (2-1 ) (2-2 ) (2-3 ) (Hayashi [1986]Dekle [1989]Barthold and Ito [1992] [1996]Campbell [1997] [1998]Shimono and Ishikawa [2002]Shimono and Otsuki [2006] [2008]Horioka [2009]) 1 2-1-1 2-1-1-1 8 (1.
More information【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背
Blanchard Solow Solow Galor and Tsiddon ,, , ,, ,,,,,, a if b c if if CES CES,,,,,,. Bowles Ciccone and Peri, .,, Bowles Hamermesh Antras Ciccone and Peri CES CES Krusell et al. Duffy et al. Hornstein
More information1990年代以降の日本の経済変動
1990 * kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp ** hitoshi.sasaki@boj.or.jp *** masahiro.higo@boj.or.jp No.05-J-10 2005 12 103-8660 30 * ** *** 1990 2005 12 1990 1990 1990 2005 11 2425 BIS E-mail: kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp
More informationm dv = mg + kv2 dt m dv dt = mg k v v m dv dt = mg + kv2 α = mg k v = α 1 e rt 1 + e rt m dv dt = mg + kv2 dv mg + kv 2 = dt m dv α 2 + v 2 = k m dt d
m v = mg + kv m v = mg k v v m v = mg + kv α = mg k v = α e rt + e rt m v = mg + kv v mg + kv = m v α + v = k m v (v α (v + α = k m ˆ ( v α ˆ αk v = m v + α ln v α v + α = αk m t + C v α v + α = e αk m
More information朕醩佑宖醸æ−žã†®ã†�ã‡†ã†®æ··å’‹æŁ´æŁ°è¨‹çfl»ã…¢ã…⁄ã…«
1 / 34 Li-Yao,, Li-Yao The Life-Cycle Effects of House Price Changes (Li-Yao ),,,, ( ) 1 ω ( ) ω 1 γ Ct Ht t T βt U(C t, H t, N t) = N t N t t T βt N t 1 γ H t : t C t : t β : ω : γ : W. Li, R. Yao, The
More information,398 4% 017,
6 3 JEL Classification: D4; K39; L86,,., JSPS 34304, 47301.. 1 01301 79 1 7,398 4% 017,390 01 013 1 1 01 011 514 8 1 Novos and Waldman (1984) Johnson (1985) Chen and Png (003) Arai (011) 3 1 4 3 4 5 0
More informationK
2015.2.27 1 1 OECD 1 1 2 50 53.6 K. 21 2010 6 18 7 2009 20.121.3 5.2 7.0 53.626.0 0.3 18.41.6 http://www.tse.or.jp/market/data/examination/distribute/b7gje6000001we32-att/report2009.p df 2014 10 21 2 50
More informationmeiji_resume_1.PDF
β β β (q 1,q,..., q n ; p 1, p,..., p n ) H(q 1,q,..., q n ; p 1, p,..., p n ) Hψ = εψ ε k = k +1/ ε k = k(k 1) (x, y, z; p x, p y, p z ) (r; p r ), (θ; p θ ), (ϕ; p ϕ ) ε k = 1/ k p i dq i E total = E
More informationN cos s s cos ψ e e e e 3 3 e e 3 e 3 e
3 3 5 5 5 3 3 7 5 33 5 33 9 5 8 > e > f U f U u u > u ue u e u ue u ue u e u e u u e u u e u N cos s s cos ψ e e e e 3 3 e e 3 e 3 e 3 > A A > A E A f A A f A [ ] f A A e > > A e[ ] > f A E A < < f ; >
More informationKeynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits
43 2000 17 28 Masahiro NAKANO 2.1 Keynes 2.2 3.1 3.2 43 2000 Keynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits Keynes IS LM 1990 Keynes 1980 90 2 1 43 2000 Keynes
More information微分積分 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです.
微分積分 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. ttp://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/00571 このサンプルページの内容は, 初版 1 刷発行時のものです. i ii 014 10 iii [note] 1 3 iv 4 5 3 6 4 x 0 sin x x 1 5 6 z = f(x, y) 1 y = f(x)
More information1 No.1 5 C 1 I III F 1 F 2 F 1 F 2 2 Φ 2 (t) = Φ 1 (t) Φ 1 (t t). = Φ 1(t) t = ( 1.5e 0.5t 2.4e 4t 2e 10t ) τ < 0 t > τ Φ 2 (t) < 0 lim t Φ 2 (t) = 0
1 No.1 5 C 1 I III F 1 F 2 F 1 F 2 2 Φ 2 (t) = Φ 1 (t) Φ 1 (t t). = Φ 1(t) t = ( 1.5e 0.5t 2.4e 4t 2e 10t ) τ < 0 t > τ Φ 2 (t) < 0 lim t Φ 2 (t) = 0 0 < t < τ I II 0 No.2 2 C x y x y > 0 x 0 x > b a dx
More informationTaro-修士論文.PDF
04M3070 1953 28 1957 32 1958 33 1988 63 1989 2002 14 2003 15-1- 2001-2- 50-3- 2001 2000 12 2,693 1995 2,557 2004 1.29 WHO 2.08 1970 1) 14 2006 18 2,774 2000 10 50 59 60 10 10 19 2) 1987 62 1988 63 1 15
More information物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―
NAIRU NAIRU NAIRU GDPGDP NAIRUNon- Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment GDP GDP NAIRU Lown and RichFisher, Mahadeva and Whitley raw materials G NAIRUTurnerFai WatanabeNAIRU Watanabe nested NAIRU
More information448 Vol. 44 No 図
Spring 09 447 概要 2004 1 2 I はじめに 19 2007 1. 34 2006 1. 32 90 1 90 Galor and Weil 1996 1996 1999 90 Sleebos 2003 Apps and Rees 2004 Martínez and Iza 2004 448 Vol. 44 No. 4 2. 20 2. 00 1. 80 1. 60 1. 40
More informationTitle 経済政策における時間非整合性 : 展望 Author(s) 木内, 祐輔 Citation 大阪大学経済学. 55(3) P.45-P.63 Issue Date Text Version publisher URL
Title 経済政策における時間非整合性 : 展望 Author(s) 木内, 祐輔 Citation 大阪大学経済学. 55(3) P.45-P.63 Issue Date 2005-12 Text Version publisher URL https://doi.org/10.18910/17414 DOI 10.18910/17414 rights Vol.55 No.3 December
More information税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上村, 敏之 ; Kitamura Takayuki, 金田, 陸幸 Citation 経済学論究, 69(4): 1-16 Issue Date 2016-3-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14671
More informationhttp://www.ns.kogakuin.ac.jp/~ft13389/lecture/physics1a2b/ pdf I 1 1 1.1 ( ) 1. 30 m µm 2. 20 cm km 3. 10 m 2 cm 2 4. 5 cm 3 km 3 5. 1 6. 1 7. 1 1.2 ( ) 1. 1 m + 10 cm 2. 1 hr + 6400 sec 3. 3.0 10 5 kg
More informationchap9.dvi
9 AR (i) (ii) MA (iii) (iv) (v) 9.1 2 1 AR 1 9.1.1 S S y j = (α i + β i j) D ij + η j, η j = ρ S η j S + ε j (j =1,,T) (1) i=1 {ε j } i.i.d(,σ 2 ) η j (j ) D ij j i S 1 S =1 D ij =1 S>1 S =4 (1) y j =
More informationQMII_10.dvi
65 1 1.1 1.1.1 1.1 H H () = E (), (1.1) H ν () = E ν () ν (). (1.) () () = δ, (1.3) μ () ν () = δ(μ ν). (1.4) E E ν () E () H 1.1: H α(t) = c (t) () + dνc ν (t) ν (), (1.5) H () () + dν ν () ν () = 1 (1.6)
More informationVol.3.indb
123 124 Migration Policy Review 2011 Vol.3 125 126 Migration Policy Review 2011 Vol.3 127 128 Migration Policy Review 2011 Vol.3 129 130 Migration Policy Review 2011 Vol.3 131 132 Migration Policy Review
More informationHanbury-Brown Twiss (ver. 2.0) van Cittert - Zernike mutual coherence
Hanbury-Brown Twiss (ver. 2.) 25 4 4 1 2 2 2 2.1 van Cittert - Zernike..................................... 2 2.2 mutual coherence................................. 4 3 Hanbury-Brown Twiss ( ) 5 3.1............................................
More informationNew Public Management NPM Walsh Leibenstein, H. X Leibenstein1966 Leibenstein1969 X X X X Blois ue
X A Consideration of Bureaucratic X-Inefficiency by the Theory of Inert Areas Toshio Uemura Abstract In this paper, I will investigate the various causes and effects of the X-inefficiency in the Governmental
More information[Ver. 0.2] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1 1.1 1 1.2 1. (elasticity) 2. (plasticity) 3. (strength) 4. 5. (toughness) 6. 1 1.2 1. (elasticity) } 1 1.2 2. (plasticity), 1 1.2 3. (strength) a < b F
More informationver.1 / c /(13)
1 -- 11 1 c 2010 1/(13) 1 -- 11 -- 1 1--1 1--1--1 2009 3 t R x R n 1 ẋ = f(t, x) f = ( f 1,, f n ) f x(t) = ϕ(x 0, t) x(0) = x 0 n f f t 1--1--2 2009 3 q = (q 1,..., q m ), p = (p 1,..., p m ) x = (q,
More informationアロー『やってみて学習』から学習:経済成長にとっての教訓 Learning from `Learning by Doing': Lessons for Economic Growth
Learning from Learning by Doing : Lessons for Economic Growth M *1 * 2 1997 2004 10 1-2013 12 29 Version1.0 2014 3 2 *1 c 2010 MIT *2 c 2004-2013 i 1993 40 MIT 1991 ii R.M.S. * 1 *1 iii i 1 1 2 15 3 27
More informationデフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程
1991 2003 GDP....................................... http://www.stat.go.jp/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ GDP http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/ GDP - - - inflation targeting Krugman a IS-LM liquidity trap Krugman b Krugman
More informationNo δs δs = r + δr r = δr (3) δs δs = r r = δr + u(r + δr, t) u(r, t) (4) δr = (δx, δy, δz) u i (r + δr, t) u i (r, t) = u i x j δx j (5) δs 2
No.2 1 2 2 δs δs = r + δr r = δr (3) δs δs = r r = δr + u(r + δr, t) u(r, t) (4) δr = (δx, δy, δz) u i (r + δr, t) u i (r, t) = u i δx j (5) δs 2 = δx i δx i + 2 u i δx i δx j = δs 2 + 2s ij δx i δx j
More information1 I 1.1 ± e = = - = C C MKSA [m], [Kg] [s] [A] 1C 1A 1 MKSA 1C 1C +q q +q q 1
1 I 1.1 ± e = = - =1.602 10 19 C C MKA [m], [Kg] [s] [A] 1C 1A 1 MKA 1C 1C +q q +q q 1 1.1 r 1,2 q 1, q 2 r 12 2 q 1, q 2 2 F 12 = k q 1q 2 r 12 2 (1.1) k 2 k 2 ( r 1 r 2 ) ( r 2 r 1 ) q 1 q 2 (q 1 q 2
More informationmain.dvi
SGC - 70 2, 3 23 ɛ-δ 2.12.8 3 2.92.13 4 2 3 1 2.1 2.102.12 [8][14] [1],[2] [4][7] 2 [4] 1 2009 8 1 1 1.1... 1 1.2... 4 1.3 1... 8 1.4 2... 9 1.5... 12 1.6 1... 16 1.7... 18 1.8... 21 1.9... 23 2 27 2.1
More information医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです.
医系の統計入門第 2 版 サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. http://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/009192 このサンプルページの内容は, 第 2 版 1 刷発行時のものです. i 2 t 1. 2. 3 2 3. 6 4. 7 5. n 2 ν 6. 2 7. 2003 ii 2 2013 10 iii 1987
More information1: 合計特殊出生率 出生率の推移 暦年 アメリカドイツフランス スウェーデン日本 Apps and Re
1 1 Galor and Weil (1996) (Sleebos, 2003) 2-1, E-mail: koba@econ.kobe-u.ac.jp 1 1: 合計特殊出生率 2.20 2.00 1.80 1.60 1.40 1.20 1.00 出生率の推移 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 暦年 アメリカドイツフランス スウェーデン日本 1997 1999 2001
More information(1.2) T D = 0 T = D = 30 kn 1.2 (1.4) 2F W = 0 F = W/2 = 300 kn/2 = 150 kn 1.3 (1.9) R = W 1 + W 2 = = 1100 N. (1.9) W 2 b W 1 a = 0
1 1 1.1 1.) T D = T = D = kn 1. 1.4) F W = F = W/ = kn/ = 15 kn 1. 1.9) R = W 1 + W = 6 + 5 = 11 N. 1.9) W b W 1 a = a = W /W 1 )b = 5/6) = 5 cm 1.4 AB AC P 1, P x, y x, y y x 1.4.) P sin 6 + P 1 sin 45
More informationさくらの個別指導 ( さくら教育研究所 ) 1 φ = φ 1 : φ [ ] a [ ] 1 a : b a b b(a + b) b a 2 a 2 = b(a + b). b 2 ( a b ) 2 = a b a/b X 2 X 1 = 0 a/b > 0 2 a
φ + 5 2 φ : φ [ ] a [ ] a : b a b b(a + b) b a 2 a 2 b(a + b). b 2 ( a b ) 2 a b + a/b X 2 X 0 a/b > 0 2 a b + 5 2 φ φ : 2 5 5 [ ] [ ] x x x : x : x x : x x : x x 2 x 2 x 0 x ± 5 2 x x φ : φ 2 : φ ( )
More informationL Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L ( 19 ) [1990] [1988] 1
1. 1-1 00 001 9 J-REIT 1- MM CAPM 1-3 [001] [1997] [003] [001] [1999] [003] 1-4 0 . -1 18 1-1873 6 1896 L Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L 6 1986 ( 19 ) -3 17 3 18 44 1 [1990]
More information01.Œk’ì/“²fi¡*
AIC AIC y n r n = logy n = logy n logy n ARCHEngle r n = σ n w n logσ n 2 = α + β w n 2 () r n = σ n w n logσ n 2 = α + β logσ n 2 + v n (2) w n r n logr n 2 = logσ n 2 + logw n 2 logσ n 2 = α +β logσ
More information1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr
1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-French (FF) 3 [5] (Capital Asset Pricing Model; CAPM
More information村本 孜51‐85/51‐85
One for all, all for one. One for all, all for one. ( One for all, all for one. ) One for all, all for one. ( One for all, all for one. ) One for all, all for one. Manes, A. (1877~1963) [2006] p. 37 Raiffisen
More informationkeisoku01.dvi
2.,, Mon, 2006, 401, SAGA, JAPAN Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Saga Univ., JAPAN 4 Mon, 2006, 401, SAGA, JAPAN Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Saga Univ., JAPAN 5 Mon, 2006, 401, SAGA, JAPAN Dept.
More information