aragciv54mac.dvi
|
|
|
- ありおき かなり
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 ( 4 ) Modigliani-Miller(1963) IRR ( ) NPV IRR NPV IRR NPV IRR 100 EBIT 20 20% τ (1 τ) 20% CC tax = S V ρ S + B V (1 τ)ρ B (1) S B V ρ S CAPM 1
2 ρ B *1 (1) MM *2 ( ) MM MM ( ) MM (1 τ) 20% (1) CC tax CC tax CC tax 1 CC tax *1 Brealey-Myers-Allen(2011) Ross-Westerfield-Jaffe(2011) *2 Modigliani-Miller(1958) Modigliani-Miller(1963) Modigliani-Miller(1963) MM MM Arditti-evy(1977) Ben-Horim(1979) Boudreaux-ong(1979) evy-sarnat(1990) 2
3 CC tax 2 CC tax 2 * *3 Myers(1984) Myers-Majluf(1984) ( ) ShyamSunder-Myers(1999) Fama-French(2002) Frank-Goyal(2003) 3
4 ( ) 2 Hayashi(1982) Dixit-Pindyck(1994) Bolton-Chen-Wang(2011) eland(1998) Morellec(2004) 1 Giat-Hackman-Subramanian(2010) DeMarzo-Fishman-He-Wang(2012) Hackbarth-Mauer(2012)
5 2 2.1 * EBIT S B S B V V senior debt EBIT EBIT µ σ Φ(µ,σ ) *5 K K= kv ( ) τ 1 V V ( B) B V + B τ[ V ( B)] V + B Q S τ( V [ B]) Q S = 0 (> ) ( V + B ) (V + B> ) Q S V + B (2) *4 Tsuji(2012) *5 N(µ,σ 2 ) 5
6 3 S > 0 V B( S )>0 V + B (2) 1 ( ) 2 3 Q B Q B K >K Q (>K) B = ( ) K (> K ) 0 (K> ) >K 1 2 K 3 K Q (K ) ( ) B = (4) 0 (> ) 2 S B CAPM 1 S B [ E( Q (>K) B B= [ E( Q (K ) B S = E( Q S ) λ cov( R M, Q S ) (5) 1+R F ]/ ) λ cov( R M, Q (>K) (1+R F ) (>K ) B ) ) λ cov( R M, Q (K ) B ) ]/ (1+R F ) (K ) R F R M (3) (6) λ= E( R M ) R F σ( R M ) 2 (5) (6) partial moment f ( ) Φ(µ,σ ) 6
7 F( ) E( Q S )=µ [1 τ+τf(v + B) F()]+σ 2 [ f () τ f (V + B)] [1 F()]+τ(V + B)[1 F(V + B)] cov( R M, Q S )=cov( R M, )[1 τ+τf(v + B) F()] E( Q (>K) B )=[1 F()] K[F() F(K)] +µ [F() F(K)] σ 2 [ f () f (K)] cov( R M, Q (>K) B )=cov( R M, )[F() F(K)+ K f ()] E( Q (K ) B )=[1 F()] cov( R M, Q (K ) B )=cov( R M, ) f () 2.2 CAPM ( ) eland(1998) Morellec(2004) CAPM ( ) µ σ cov( R M, ) Q S Q B ( ) (2) (3) ( (4) ) (5) (6) (5) (6) S B µ σ k λ R F cov( R M, ) τ µ σ 3 *6 3 *6 k cov( R M, ) 7
8 S = S (,µ,σ ) B= B(,µ,σ ) V = V (,µ,σ )=S (,µ,σ )+ B(,µ,σ ) µ σ µ σ µ σ µ σ µ σ µ σ *7 µ σ 2 EBIT EBIT EBIT EBIT EBIT ω EBIT ( ) ( ) µ *7 Hart(1995) 8
9 ω µ ω µ 1 µ =ω α α>0 (7) α 1 µ ω α *8 = arg max V (,µ,σ ) (8) ( ) σ S σ = arg max σ S (,µ,σ ) (9) (7) (8) (9) 3 µ σ µ σ µ =ω α (10) V (,µ,σ )=0 (11) S (,µ σ,σ )=0 (12) µ σ ω α 2 S B *8 Jensen-Meckling(1976) Myers(1977) EBIT Tsuji(2012) Appendix ((7) EBIT (7) 1 2 9
10 ω α S = S (ω,α;,µ,σ ) B= B(ω,α;,µ,σ ) V = V (ω,α;,µ,σ ) EBIT 1 ω ( ) 10 EBIT 50 1 α 0.2 k 0.4 τ E( R M )=0.11 σ( R M )=0.18 R F =0.06 corr( R M, ) 0.2 E( R M ) 11% (1.11) E( R M )= λ µ =47.41 σ =23.66 =12.93 (10) (11) (12) 3 S B V DR B/V ROA R ROA = ω V V (13) ω (50.0) (10 ) ROA R ROA 1 * % *9 ROA (13) R ROA (1+R ROA )
11 1 ω α k τ E( R M ) σ( R M ) R F λ corr( R M, ) µ σ S B V DR ROA ( )E( R M ) σ( R M ) R F 1 1 λ 1 10 ω µ σ 1 10 DR B/V ROA ( ) (13) R ROA 1 2 ω ω µ σ S B V DR ROA ( )ω ω ω µ σ S B V 1.2 DB ROA 1 (10) ω µ
12 1 *10 I I I B I S I= I S + I B I I I S I B (0) α (0) µ (0) σ (0) V ( ω (0) ( S ω (0) σ µ (0) =,α ; (0),µ (0) α (0) (10),α ; (0),µ (0),σ (0),σ (0) ) = 0 (11) ) = 0 (12) Φ ( ) µ (0),σ (0) (0) S (0) B(0) S (0) = S ( ω (0),α ; (0),µ (0) B (0) = B (,α ; (0),µ (0),σ (0),σ (0) ) ) *
13 Φ ( ) µ (1), (1) S (1) B(1) (1) µ (1) (1) σ S ( ) = arg max S (1),µ (1) σ,σ (10) (14) µ (1) µ (1) = α (1) (15) α α (1) *11 B(1) S (1) S (1) = S ( ω (1),α ; (1),µ (1) B (1) = B (,α ; (1),µ (1),, I I B ) (1 (0) B (1) = I B (16) (1) I B (1) ( ) (1) B (1) 1 (0) ( ) (1) (0) I (1) B 1 (0) B (1) (1) I B I B (0) B (1) B (0) (1) ) ) *11 (15) α α α ( ) 13
14 I S 1 S P(0) 1 P (1) n (0) S S (0) = n(0) S S S n(1) S S I S /P (1) S S (1) S (1) = n(1) S P(1) S = n(0) S + I S P(1) S P (1) S P (1) P (0) = S (0) + I S+ n (0) S (P(1) S P (0) S ) (17) I S S (1) ( 3 ) P (1) S (17) P (1) S P (0) S S (1) S (0) + I S P (1) S = P (0) S ( ) S (1) = S (0) + I S ( = arg max S ω (1) σ,α ; ) (1),µ (1),σ (14) (1 (0) (1) ( S ω (1),α ; (1),µ (1) µ (1) = ) B (,α ; (1),µ (1), S (0) P (0) S α (1) (15) ) S ( ω (0),,α ; (0),µ (0) ) = IB (16) ),σ (0) = IS (18) (14) σ (15) (16) (18) (16) (18) 4 (0) I S I B µ (1) µ (1) 4 (1) (14) (15) 14
15 (16) (18) 2 (1) µ (1) (1) R q ω(1) ω(0) I I (1 ) (I B I S ) I I B I S R q I B R q R q R q (I B ) R q (19) min R q 0 I B I I S = I I B (20) I B I B R q ROA (19) R q 1 (13) R ROA 2 1 S (1) S (0) = I S I S = S (0) I B B (1) S (0)= B (1) 15
16 I B (1) B (0) = I B (16) (0) (1) B(1) = B (0) (21) (21) 1 I B B (0) (21) B (0) 1 ω c c = cω(0) = cσ (0) = ω(1) σ (0) (22) 2 I( ) B (0) /V (0) I B /I I B I S I B I S B (,α ; (1),µ (1) ( S ω (1),α ; (1),µ (1) = ω(1) σ (0) (22) µ (1) = α (1) (15) ) (, B ω (0),α ; ) (0),µ (0),σ (0) = IB (23), ) S ( ω (0),α ; (0),µ (0),σ (0) ) = IS (18) (18) (15) (23) (22) (23) 16
17 3 µ (0) σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR ROA µ (1) (1) S (1) B (1) V (1) I B I B /I RRI ( )ω µ σ 1 10 (0) (1) DR B/V ROA ( ) (13) R ROA 1 RRI ( ) (19) R q 1 (22) 4 µ (1) (1) 4 ω(0) (19) I= 2 3 I= I B I S B (0) ) B(1) ) (S (1) (S (0) I S I B (1) =14.46 µ (1) = I=2 =50 ω(1) =55.91 R q % ( 3 RRI ) RRI R q 1 RRI ROA B (0) /V (0) I I B I S 1 I=2 I B 0 2 ( I S = I I B ) ((22) (15) (23) (18) 4 ) R q R q R q R q R q 1 R q I B I S B (0) S (0) 17
18 RRI I B 1 (I B ) ( ) I B I S R q ( ) (I B ) R q I B I I B 1 I I B R q I B 1 I I B R q I B 3.3 R q R q I B I S R q (20) 4 I B = 2 I= 2 R q 18
19 0.119 RRI I B 2 (I B ) ( ) 4 ( ) µ (0) σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR ROA µ (1) (1) S (1) B (1) V (1) I B RRI ( ) 3 I B 0 2 R q 2 I B R q ( B (1) 8.28 I B 2 ) 1 S (0) σ (1) S (1) σ (1) σ (0) = 0 [σ,σ ] S (1) 19
20 σ σ = ω(1) σ σ (0) 1.3 σ (0) ω σ σ 30% 4 σ σ 4 1 R ROA R q R q R ROA σ (0) 20
21 4 I α k τ λ corr( R M, ) I B /I 1.0 ( ) B (0) OldB OldB OldB B (0) DR (0) DR (1) 1 [σ,σ ] σ ω(0) σ (0) RRI ROA 5 ( (0) ) 2 DR(0) ROA RRI 6 50 I RRI 5 7 α α DR (0) α=0.16 α= % 20% 7 α RRI 8 9 k ( 8) τ ( 9) 21
22 k τ DR (0) k τ RRI k RRI 8 9 τ RRI λ 11 corr( R M, ) λ corr( R M, λ corr( R M, ) RRI λ corr( R M, ) 1 (1) RRI 5 11 CC tax RRI tax *12 10% 15% 5 CC tax RRI tax CC tax 2 α (0) µ (0) σ (0) α 1 ( ) α (0) µ (0) σ (0) *12 RRI tax = (1 τ)rri 10 1 CC tax RRI tax 22
23 µ (0) µ (1) 5 σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR (0) ROA CC tax (1) B (1) DR (1) OldB I B /I RRI RRI tax ( ) DR (0) DR (1) B (0) /V (0) B(1) /V (1) ROA (13) R ROA RRI (19) R q 1 CC tax (1) OldB B (1) I B I B /I 1.0 RRI tax (1 τ)rri α=0.2 k=0.4 τ=0.45 I=2.0 λ=3.24 corr( R M, )=0.2 I µ (0) µ (1) 6 I σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR (0) ROA CC tax (1) B (1) DR (1) OldB I B /I RRI RRI tax ( ) α=0.2 k=0.4 τ=0.45 λ=3.24 corr( R M, )=0.2 5 α µ (0) µ (1) 7 α σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR (0) ROA CC tax (1) B (1) DR (1) OldB I B /I RRI RRI tax ( ) k=0.4 τ=0.45 I=2 λ=3.24 corr( R M, )=
24 k µ (0) µ (1) 8 k σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR (0) ROA CC tax (1) B (1) DR (1) OldB I B /I RRI RRI tax ( ) α=0.2 τ=0.45 I=2 λ=3.24 corr( R M, )=0.2 5 τ µ (0) µ (1) 9 τ σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR (0) ROA CC tax (1) B (1) DR (1) OldB I B /I RRI RRI tax ( ) α=0.2 k=0.4 I=2 λ=3.24 corr( R M, )=0.2 5 λ µ (0) µ (1) 10 λ σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR (0) ROA CC tax (1) B (1) DR (1) OldB I B /I RRI RRI tax ( ) α=0.2 k=0.4 τ=0.45 I=2 corr( R M, )=
25 corr( R M, ) µ (0) µ (1) 11 corr( R M, ) σ (0) (0) S (0) B (0) V (0) DR (0) ROA CC tax (1) B (1) DR (1) OldB I B /I RRI RRI tax ( ) α=0.2 k=0.4 τ=0.45 I=2 λ= I 15% [1](period[1]) [2](period[2]) 10 1 S (0) B(0) E( R M ) σ( R M ) R F λ 1 10 corr( R M, ) k τ k=0.3 τ [1] 515 [2] 592 α ( ) 3.1 [1] 442 [2] 576 ( =σ ) [1] 284 [2] 572 σ [2] [1] 3 [1] 3 [2] σ [1] 253 [2]
26 12 period[1] period[2] 1 (A) (B) (B)/(A) 91.5% 97.6% (C) (C)/(B) 93.8% 99.7% ( ) period[1] ( [1]) period[2] ( [2]) α σ (0) (0) µ (0) 3.1 [1] 1 31 [2] σ σ σ σ 13 RRI tax CC tax *13 CC tax RRI tax (s.d.) CC tax RRI tax 2 CC tax RRI tax di f f di f f CC tax RRI tax di f f [1] [2] [1] 0.78% [2] 18.54% [1] di f f 130 [2] di f f 6 CC tax RRI tax [1] [2] CC tax 13 RRI tax CC tax 3 t-test *13 4 CC tax 5 CC tax CC tax 26
27 13 CC tax RRI tax CC tax RRI tax di f f period[1] period[2] period[1] period[2] period[1] period[2] mean s.d min max difference: test statistics correlation firms di f f > 0 t-test di f f - Wilcoxon Pearson Spearman Kendall period[1] period[2] ( ) RRI tax CC tax di f f di f f = (CC tax RRI tax )/RRI tax t-test RRI tax CC tax t diff- f f = 0 Wilcoxon Pearson Spearman Kendall 5% 1% t- di f f - di f f - 3 Wilcoxon [1] RRI tax CC tax [2] 1% RRI tax CC tax 13 3 (Pearson) [1] [2] Spearman Kendall 3 [2] [1] 3 2 1% 14 [1] [2] RRI tax CC tax RRI tax [1] [2] RRI tax CC tax % RRI tax CC tax 27
28 14 CC tax RRI tax total 278 same movement 183 (percentage) (65.8%) ( ) total RRI tax [1] [2] RRI tax same movement CC tax ( ) 1% 18% CC tax RRI tax 6 MM
29 1 (7) (15) α [1] Arditti, F. D., and H. evy The Weighted Average Cost of Capital as a Cutoff rate: A Critical Analysis of the Classical Textbook Weighted Average. Financial Management 6: [2] Ben-Horim, M Comment on The Weighted Average Cost of Capital as a Cutoff Rate. Financial Management 8: [3] Bolton, Patrick, Hui Chen, and Neng Wang A Unified Theory of Tobin s Q, Corporate Investment, Financing, and Risk Management. Journal of Finance, Vol.66, No.5 (October, 2011), pp [4] Boudreaux, K. J., and H. W. ong The Weighted Average Cost of Capital as a Cutoff Rate: A Further Analysis. Financial Management 8: [5] Brealey, R. A., S. C. Myers, and F. Allen Principles of Corporate Finance(tenth edition). McGraw-Hill/Irwin. [6] DeMarzo, Peter M., Michael J. Fishman, higuo He, and Neng Wang, Dynamic Agency and the q Theory of Investment, Journal of Finance Vol.67, No.6 (December, 2012), pp [7] Dixit, A. K., and R. S. Pindyck Investment under Uncertainty. Princeton University Press. [8] Fama, Eugene F., and Kenneth R. French, Testing Trade-Off and Pecking Order Predictions about Dividends and Debt, Review of Financial Studies, Vol.15, No.1 (Spring, 2002), pp [9] Frank, M.., and V. K. Goyal, Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics Vol.67, No.2 (February, 2003), pp [10] Giat, Yahel, Steve T. Hackman, and Ajay Subramanian, Investment under Uncertainty, Heterogeneous Beliefs, and Agency Conflicts, Review of Financial Studies Vol.23, No.4 (April, 2010), pp [11] Hart, O Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure. Oxford University Press. [12] Hackbarth, Dirk, and David C. Mauer, Optimal Priority Structure, Capital Structure, and 29
30 Investment, Review of Financial Studies, Vol.25, No.3 (March, 2012), pp [13] Hayashi, Fumio Tobin s Marginal q and Average q: A Neoclassical Interpretation, Econometrica, Vol.50, No.1 (January, 1982), pp [14] Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: [15] eland, H. E Agency Costs, Risk Management, and Capital Structure. Journal of Finance 53: [16] evy H., and M. Sarnat Capital Investment and Financial Decisions(fourth edition). Prentice Hall. [17] Morellec, E Can Managerial Discretion Explain Observed everage Ratios? Review of Financial Studies 17: [18] Modigliani, F., and M. H. Miller The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. American Economic Review 48: [19] Modigliani, F., and M. H. Miller Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction. American Economic Review 53: [20] Myers, S. C Determinants of Corporate Borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 5: [21] Myers, S. C The Capital Structure Puzzle. Journal of Finance 39: [22] Myers, S. C., and N. S. Majluf Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have. Journal of Financial Economics 13: [23] Ross, S. A., R. W. Westerfield, and J. Jaffe Corporate Finance(ninth edition). McGraw- Hill/Irwin. [24] Shyam-Sunder, akshmi, and Stewart C. Myers Testing Static Tradeoff against Pecking Order Models of Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.51, No.2 (February, 1999), pp [25] Tsuji, Y Measuring the Agency Costs of Debt: A Simplified Approach. Journal of Business, Economics and Finance 1:
わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題
* [email protected] ** [email protected] *** [email protected] No.05-J-3 2005 3 103-8660 30 No.05-J-3 2005 3 1990 * [email protected] ** [email protected]
わが国企業による株主還元策の決定要因:配当・自社株消却のインセンティブを巡る実証分析
* [email protected] ** [email protected] No.05-J-6 2005 4 103-8660 30 No.05-J-6 2005 4 * ** 1990 1 2 1990 * [email protected] ** [email protected] 1 1990 1 1990 1 [2004]
Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C
27 [email protected] 27 4 3 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem Jordan Saddle Path. GDP % GDP 2. 3. 4.. Tobin q 2 2. Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F
PFI
PFI 23 3 3 PFI PFI 1 1 2 3 2.1................................. 3 2.2..................... 4 2.3.......................... 5 3 7 3.1................................ 7 3.2.................................
Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,
,, 2010 8 24 2010 9 14 A B C A (B Negishi(1960) (C) ( 22 3 27 ) E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected] 1 1 1 2 3 Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987)
(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)
,, 23 4 30 (i) (ii) (i) (ii) Negishi (1960) 2010 (2010) ( ) ( ) (2010) E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected] E-mail:[email protected] 1 1 16 (2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987)
headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s
CJEB The financial strategies of Japanese multinational enterprises and internal capital market, Columbia Business School, CJEB, Working Paper No., April,. headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart
repocost.PDF
178 2 10 8 39-52 (tax planning) [Scholes and Wolfson,1992] (tax cost saving hypothesis) (accounting choice) (economic consequences) (financial reporting costs) (1) (financial reporting cost hypothesis)
株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─
q E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] OECD Vives Tirole Shleifer and Vishny q %% %% % % Allen and Gale %% % Admati, Pfreiderer and Zechner Burkart, Gromb and Panunzi Cremer 1995Pagno
商学 63‐3☆/6.山本
193 W. A. 1 2 3 1 2 WTO FTA TPP D. P. P. W. A. 194 2 3 Lewis 1954 1982, 1987 1999 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 A B 1987 119 1985 Krugman and Obstfeld 2009 19742006 3 W. A. 195 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 A a1 a2 * * i ai i 1, 2
23_02.dvi
Vol. 2 No. 2 10 21 (Mar. 2009) 1 1 1 Effect of Overconfidencial Investor to Stock Market Behaviour Ryota Inaishi, 1 Fei Zhai 1 and Eisuke Kita 1 Recently, the behavioral finance theory has been interested
Keynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits
43 2000 17 28 Masahiro NAKANO 2.1 Keynes 2.2 3.1 3.2 43 2000 Keynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits Keynes IS LM 1990 Keynes 1980 90 2 1 43 2000 Keynes
Title Author(s) Kobe University Repository : Kernel 流 動 性 危 機 : レパレッジとモニタリング (< 特 集 > 世 界 金 融 危 機 )(Liquidity Crisis : Leverage and Monitoring ( World Financial Crisis)) 丸 茂, 俊 彦 Citation 国 民 経 済 雑 誌,203(1):107-119
Vol.8 No (July 2015) 2/ [3] stratification / *1 2 J-REIT *2 *1 *2 J-REIT % J-REIT J-REIT 6 J-REIT J-REIT 10 J-REIT *3 J-
Vol.8 No.2 1 9 (July 2015) 1,a) 2 3 2012 1 5 2012 3 24, 2013 12 12 2 1 2 A Factor Model for Measuring Market Risk in Real Estate Investment Hiroshi Ishijima 1,a) Akira Maeda 2 Tomohiko Taniyama 3 Received:
shuron.dvi
01M3065 1 4 1.1........................... 4 1.2........................ 5 1.3........................ 6 2 8 2.1.......................... 8 2.2....................... 9 3 13 3.1.............................
2015 : (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1
2015 : 27 6 13 1 (heterogenous) Heterogeneous homogeneous Heterogenous agent model Bewley 1 (The Overlapping-Generations Models:OLG) OLG OLG Allais (1947) 2 Samuelson(1958) 3 OLG Solow Ramsey Samuelson
カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )
β TOPIX 1 22 β β smoothness priors (the Capital Asset Pricing Model, CAPM) CAPM 1 β β β β smoothness priors :,,. E-mail: [email protected]., 104 1 TOPIX β Z i = β i Z m + α i (1) Z i Z m α i α i β i (the
082_rev2_utf8.pdf
3 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1 3 3 3 2008 3 2008 2008 3 2008 2008, 1 5 Lo and MacKinlay (1990a) de Jong and Nijman (1997) Cohen et al. (1983) Lo and MacKinlay (1990a b) Cohen et al. (1983) de Jong and Nijman (1997)
autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)
Discussion Paper Series A No.425 2002 2 186-8603 [email protected] 14 1 24 autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] 1990 12 13 (A) 12370027 13 1 1980 Lo/MacKinlay [1988]
濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G
濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G34 950-2181 2 8050 Tel. and fax: 025-262-6538 E-mail: [email protected]
商学 60周年記念号/24.内田浩徳
SFAS 109 SFAS 96 1 2 net deductible amounts Richard 1 G. Schroeder, Myrtle W. Clark and Jack M. Cathey Financial Accounting Standards Board, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.96, Accounting
わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―
GCGC SC GCSC SC SC E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] GC general collateralscspecial collateral Griffiths and Winters GCFF Jordan and JordanDuffie matched book GC GC SC DuffieKrishnamurthy
Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003
266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2
固定資産の減損会計へのリアル・オプション・アプローチ
NPV NPV NPV join resource NPV 1 004, 6-7 005 4 1 ( ( 1)) 1 (3) 003 176-177 1999 10-104 IASC 1998, paras. B0, B35 probabiliy crierioneconomic crierion (1) NPV ne presen value mehod NPV () join resource
1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199
Nelson-Siegel Nelson-Siegel 1992 2007 15 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 2 FF VAR 1996 FF B) 1 Nelson-Siegel 15 90 1 Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel
季刊 企業と法創造 第1巻第4号(通巻第4号)
Aoki and Patrick Hoshi and Kashyap ROE 125 ROA Aoki Odagiri Frankl Fruin 126 NEEDS ROE ROA ROE ROEROA ROE ROEIQ ROE ROE ROE 127 128 IQ ROE ROE ROE ROE ROA ROE 129 Miyajima 130 Okazaki Teranishi GHQ % Prowse,
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Quarterly Journal of Economics Review of Economics and Statistics Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis Economics of Education Review Journal of Political
( ) z W n u K P N P = (1 + z)wn N = nuk (1) (2) I/K u e f r l (= L/PK) (4) I K = g(u, r, e f, l ) g u > 0, g r < 0, g e f > 0,
1 money view credit view IS-LM Sims[1980] Bernanke[1983] 1930 Bernanke and Blinder[1988] IS-LM (credit channel) (1) 3 4 (2) 2 1 3 4 5 2 2.1 2.1.1 ( ) z W n u K P N P = (1 + z)wn N = nuk (1) (2) 2.1.2 I/K
Attendance Demand for J-League õ Shinsuke KAWAI* and Takeo HIRATA* Abstract The purpose of this study was to clarify the variables determining the attendance in J-league matches, using the 2,699 J-league
BJ-No.7 01 三好秀和.indd
Vol. 72013 1 1 AIJ 1 AIJ AIJ AIJ AIJ 1 2 3 4 AIJ 2 1986 1986 1 21986 2007 7 2 Vol. 7 3 4 1986 1986 5 5 6 31981 1984 1986 23 3 23 3 247 502 6 22 17 26.4 19.8 5 4 18 7 12 16 10915 200737 41 AIJ 52007 7 62011
Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr
Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina 2009 1. はじめに Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Tax Competition
日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析
196 2017 * ** ** 1 2 3 JEL Classification Codes D14, D15, E21 Keywords * 28 Hyun- Hoon Lee Robert Owen Kwanho Shin ** 29 196 An Empirical Analysis of the Saving Behavior of Elderly Households in Japan
A5 PDF.pwd
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title 日 本 版 不 動 産 投 資 信 託 ( J-REIT) における 利 益 相 反 問 題 Author(s) Kojima, Koji, 児 島, 幸 治 Citation 商 学 論 究, 63(3): 359-375 Issue Date 2016-03-10 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14192
アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて
* ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East
野村資本市場研究所|アジアの金融競争力(PDF)
2013 Spring 1. GDP 3 26% 2. 3. 4. GDP 1 GDP 2000 25.4% 2012 10 IMF 1 GDP 28.7%GDP 10.7% 20.3% 2000 2012 10 2 3 2000 2012 4.2 5.4 2 2000 14% 2012 26% GDP 2012 30 10 32003 11 2013 Spring 100% 2 90% 80% 70%
03.Œk’ì
HRS KG NG-HRS NG-KG AIC Fama 1965 Mandelbrot Blattberg Gonedes t t Kariya, et. al. Nagahara ARCH EngleGARCH Bollerslev EGARCH Nelson GARCH Heynen, et. al. r n r n =σ n w n logσ n =α +βlogσ n 1 + v n w
2 / 24
2017 11 9 1 / 24 2 / 24 Solow, 1957 total factor productivity; TFP 5% 経済成長率の要因分解 4% 3% 2.68% 2.51% 2% 1% 0% 1.63% 1.50% 0.34% 0.42% 0.55% 0.97% 1.14% 0.86% 0.13% -0.59% -0.59% -0.09% 0.01% -1% 1970-80
Vol. 3 No (Mar. 2010) An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koich
Vol. 3 No. 2 51 64 (Mar. 2010 1 1 1 An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koichi Miyazaki 1 and Koji Nishiki 1 Preceding researches
Ver. 1.0 (discretion) (revenue management) (fictitious revenue recognition) (window dressing) (fraudulent accounting practice) SEC (General
2004.11.25 Ver. 1.0 (discretion) (revenue management) (fictitious revenue recognition) (window dressing) (fraudulent accounting practice) SEC (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles: GAAP) GAAP (realization
財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察
1998 1999 1998 1999 10 10 1999 30 (1982, 1996) (1997) (1977) (1990) (1996) (1997) (1996) Ihori, Doi, and Kondo (1999) (1982) (1984) (1987) (1993) (1997) (1998) CAPM 1980 (time inconsistency) Persson, Persson
