橡ミサイル防衛最終版.PDF
|
|
|
- きょうすけ みのしま
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IPSHU No.28 April, 2002 TEL FAX E_mail: URL:
2 C 2 2 passive defense active defense B ICBM
3 damage-limiting prevail Ballistic Missile Defense, BMD civil defense MD MD 2 BMD ABM ICBM ABM 2 80 Strategic Defense Initiative, SDI interceptor Hit-To-Kill, HTK X 2
4 MD 3 3
5 NMD NMD SDI SDI Global Protection Against Limited Strike, GPALS Bottom-Up Review, BUR NMD Theater Missile Defense, TMD (1) TMD TMD ABM TMD ABM ABM ABM TMD ABM ABM TMD ABM TMD TMD Demarcation Accords 4
6 1992 ABM (1) Launch on Warning, LOW 1 (2) (3) ABM ABM 3 (2) 5
7 ( MIT ) ( ) TMD 3, TMD ABM ABM TMD TMD Navy Theater Wide, NTW Light Exo-Atmospheric Projectile, LEAP Theater High Altitude Area Defense, THAAD ABM (3) 6
8 BMD TMD NMD TMD (1) unilateralism unipolar hegemony R.A. New Isolationism 1950 Cooperative Security (4) CTBT (5) 7
9 NPT Counterproliferation rogue states of concern (6) W. J. (7) NMD NMD NMD NMD (8) (2) NMD 3 WMD 8
10 National Intelligence Estimate, NIE D. H NIE (9) multistaging WMD 9
11 NMD (10) (11) accidental inadvertent unauthorized C 3 I
12 NMD (12) (3) NMD NMD NMD 1980 SDI NMD SDI NMD NMD NMD NMD SDI ICBM countermeasures 11
13 NMD NMD 2 (1) NMD NMD CBO CBO CBO CBO NMD 200 Peña & Corny, Policy Analysis, March 6, 1999, p
14 2 (2) ( ) ( ) 99 (ABL) ( ) M.O Hanlon, Star Wars Strikes Back, Foreign Affairs, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp ( ) NMD NMD NMD (13) (1) Ballistic Missile Defense Organization (BMDO), National Missile Defense ( ): An Overview, pp.3-4. (2) M. Bunn, Yeltsin Suggest Joint Missile Defense, Arms Control Today (ACT), Jan./Feb. 1992, pp.38, 49; The Bush-Yeltsin Summit: Bringing Reality to the Nuclear Balances, Ibid., July/Aug. 1992, pp.18-19; Bunn, The ABM Talks: The More Things Change., Ibid., Sept.1992, pp.16, (3) ABM ABM-TMD G. Lewis & T. Postol, Portrait of a Bad Idea, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, July/Aug. 1997, pp.21-23; J. Pike & M. Corbin, Taking Aim at the ABM Treaty: THAAD and U.S. Security, Arms Control Today, May 1995, p.5. 13
15 (4) J. Cirincione, The Assault on Arms Control, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Jan./Feb. 2000, p.33. (5) M. T. Clark, Arms Control is not Enough, Orbis, Winter 1996, pp.78-79; K.B. Payne, The Case for National Missile Defense, Ibid., Spring 2000, pp ; J. Cirincione, The Asian Nuclear Reaction Chain, Foreign Policy, Spring 2000, pp ; W. Kristol & R. Kagan, Toward a Neo-Reganite Foreign Policy, Foreign Affairs, July/Aug. 1996, pp (6) M. T. Clark, The Trouble with Collective Security, Orbis, Spring 1995, pp ; K. B. Payne, Post-Cold War Deterrence and Missile Defense, Ibid., pp (7) Clark, Orbis, Spring 1995, pp ; Orbis, Winter 1996, p.73. (8) I. H. Daalder, J. M. Goldgeier & J. M. Lindsay, Deploying NMD: Not Whether, But How, Survival, Spring 2000, pp.6-7, (9) (10) M. O Hanlon, Star Wars Strikes Back, Foreign Affairs, Nov./Dec. 1999, pp (11) / NMD C. L. Glaser & S. Fetter, National Missile Defense and the Future of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy, International Security, Summer 2001, pp (12) C. V. Peña & B. Corny, National Missile Defense: Examining the Options, Policy Analysis, March 6, 1999, pp.6-9; D. A. Wilkening, BMD and Strategic Stability, Adelphi Paper No. 334, May 2000, pp (13) W. B. Slocombe, The Administration s Approach, The Washington Quarterly, Summer 2000, p
16 NMD BMD TMD NMD NMD NMD 2005 NMD NMD NMD (1) (1) HTK (2) NMD X ABM (3) X X (4) Space Baced Infra-Red System High Earth Orbit, SBIRS-High DSP SBIRS-Low 6 SBIRS-High 24 SBIRS-Low (5) C 3 15
17 NMD NMD 3 NMD (1) 1 C X 1 5 DSP SBIRS NMD BMDO 3 NMD 1999 NMD 2002 NMD NMD NMD (2) (2) 2 C
18 3 X 2010 SBIRS-Low (3) C X X (3) NMD NMD NMD NMD NMD ABM NMD NMD NMD
19 NMD (4) NMD NMD TMD 18
20 MD ABM MD 2008 (1) Wilkening, Adelphi Paper No.334, p.30; Peña & Conry, op. cit., pp (2) Peña & Conry, pp.13-14, 16. (3) Wilkening, Adelphi Paper No.334, pp.30-32; Wilkening, Survival, Spring 2000, pp (4)
21 MD MD (1) MD NMD WMD NMD NMD (1) NMD WMD WMD sameness 20
22 togetherness WMD NMD TMD (2) comprehensive or constructive engagement MD MD MD 21
23 WMD WMD NMD NMD ICBM ICBM (3) Single-Shot Probability of Kill, SSPK SSPKs NMD 25 NMD (4) MD MD 22
24 submunitions (5) SDI (6) MD boost-phase terminal-phase mid-course NMD Boost-Phase Intercept, BPI 23
25 BPI BPI BPI NMD BPI ICBM ICBM BPI MD BPI (7) BPI 70~150 ICBM ~300 20~ (8) BPI BPI BPI BPI BPI BPI 24
26 SPI BPI BPI BPI UAVs Airborne Interceptor, ABI ABI BPI BPI MD ABI BPI ICBM ICBM ABI ICBM ABI ABI ABI ABI UAVs (9) BPI ABM ABM 5 MD BPI ABM BPI ICBM 25
27 TMD NMD TMD BMD TMD TMD NMD NMD TMD TMD NMD TMD NMD TMD NMD TMD MD TMD ~30 3 Patriot Advanced Capability-3, PAC-3 Navy Area Defense, NAD THAAD NTW THAAD PAC-3 TMD NMD 26
28 (10) TMD NMD TMD NMD TMD NMD TMD ( ) TMD TMD PAC-3 NAD 27
29 THAAD NTW TMD TMD 650 THAAD NTW THAAD NTW NMD 650 START- 1,700 (11) MD TMD NMD THAAD NTW TMD NMD NTW BPI NMD NMD SPY-1B ICBM 28
30 NMD SPY-1B NMD 200 (12) 12 2 (1) MD ABM MD ABM ABM ICBM 1 3 MD 3 6 a 2 9 (13) TMD TMD ABM 3, TMD TMD NMD NMD TMD ABM 5 29
31 MD ABM ICBM MD 1 MD ABM MD ABM ABM 15 6 ABM ABM (14) 12 ABM MD ABM MD ABM MD 30
32 MD (15) (16) ABM MD ABM MD 1980 SDI ABM MD ABM (1) W. J. Nov (2) K. Payne, Looking Security Threats: The Case for National Missile Defense, Orbis, Spring 2000, pp (3) G. Lewis, L. Gronland & D. Wright, National Missile Defense: An Indefensible System, Foreign Policy, Winter 1999/2000, pp ; S. Snyder, Pyong-yang s Pressure, The Washington Quarterly, Summer 2000, pp (4) Wilkening, Adelphi Paper No. 334, pp (5) G. N. Lewis, T. A. Postol & J. Pike, Why National Missile Defense Won t Work, Scientific American, Aug. 1999, pp ; Wilkening, Adelphi Paper No. 334, pp ;L. L. Garwin, A Defense that Will Not Defend, The Washington Quarterly, Summer 2000, pp NIE ICBM C. L. Glaser & S. Fetter, National Missile Defense and the Future of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy, International 31
33 Security, Summer 2001, p.51. (6) (7) R. L. Garwin, Boost-Phase Intercept: A Better Alternative, Arms Control Today, Sept. 2000, pp. 8-9, 11; Wilkening, Amending the ABM Treaty, Survival, Spring 2000, pp J Glaser & Fetter, op, cit., pp.53-54, (8) Wilkening, Adelphi Paper No.334, p.61. (9) Wilkening, Adelphi Paper No.334, p.59-60, 65, 67-69; Wilkening, Survival, Spring 2000, pp (10) Wilkening, Adelphi Paper No.334, pp (11) Ibid., pp (12) Peña & Conry, Policy Analysis, March 6, 1999, pp (13) Wilkening, Survival, Spring 2000, pp (14) (15) J. Newhouse, The Missile defense Debate, Foreign Affairs, July/Aug. 2001, pp MD M. Krepon, Lost in Space, Foreign Affairs, May/June 2001, pp (16) A. A. Pikayev, Moscow s Matrix, The Washington Quarterly, Summer 2000, pp
34 MD MD (2) MD ABM MD MD TMD BPI NMD 1 C NMD (1) NMD 2 C-2 3 C-3 MD 1, (2) MD NMD 33
35 (1) MD NMD 1 C MD BPI MD MD MD (3) (2) MD MD MD MD MD MD START- START- ICBM SLBM ICBM 34
36 SLBM ICBM ICBM M SS-27 ICBM (4) (3) S300 (5) MD ABM NMD MD MD (1) MD MD (2) MD NATO MD 35
37 (3) MD (4) ABM ABM (6) NMD S. NMD NMD NMD NMD N National MD (7) NMD GMD MD MD G. NATO (8) MD ABM 36
38 15 ABM MD ABM MD ICBM 2 MD (9) ABM MD MD ABM (1) ABM MD MD (10) (2) (3) 37
39 NATO (11) MD 5 MD No.2 P. J. ABM MD (12) MD 1999 MD MD BMD MD 38
40 MD MD SLBM ICBM 5 A 1 ICBM ICBM ICBM (13) ICBM NMD MD MD (14) MD ICBM 5 31 SLBM 2 MRV/MIRV = 2 (15) 39
41 (LOW) N.Y. MD MD MD NIRA MD (16) strategic reassurance (17) MD MD (1) 1,000~1,300 Wilkening, Survival, Spring 2000, p.37. (2) Wilkening, Adelphi Paper No.334, pp.37-41, 44; Peña & Conry, Policy Analysis, March 6, 1999, pp (3) Daalder & Others, Survival, Spring 2000, pp.15, 19; Wilkening, Survival, Spring 2000, p
42 (4) Daalder & Others, op. cit., p.21; Wikening, Survival, Spring 2000, pp.30, 38-39; Glaser & Fetter, op. cit., pp J (5) Daalder & Others, op. cit., pp.21-22; Wilkening, Survival, Spring 2000, p (6) C. Grand, Missile Defense: The View from the Other Side of the Atlantic, Arms Control Today (ACT), Sept. 2000, pp.14-17; A. J. Pierre, Europe and Missile Defense: Tactical Considerations, Fundamental Concerns, ACT, May 2001, pp SDI D. S. Yost, Ballistic Missile Defense and the Atlantic Alliance, International Security, Fall 1982, pp (7) Pierre, op. cit., p.8. (8) (9) (10) Daalder & Others, op. cit., p.15; Wilkening, Survival, Spring 2000, p.38,43. (11) (12) (13) Daalder & Others, Survival, Spring 2000, p.13. (14) J. Mendelsohn, ACT, April 2000, p.14; Glaser & Fetter, op. cit., pp.58, 81-84; L. Fuerth, Return of the Nuclear Debate, The Washington Quarterly, Autumn 2001, pp (15) B. Roberts, R. A. Manning & R. N. Montaperto, China: The Forgotten Nuclear Power, Foreign Affairs, July/Aug. 2000, pp B. Roberts, The Road Ahead for Arms Control, The Washington Quarterly, Spring 2000, p.222. CIA W. J Wilkening, Adelphi Paper No.334, pp (16) (17) Daalder & Others, Survival, Spring 2000, p
43 MD TRW NMD TMD MD MD MD WMD 3 WMD MD WMD WMD MD NPT WMD MD MD 42
44 (1) MD MD MD MD (1) MD 2003 MD (2) MAD ABM MAD 43
45 MAD MD ,700 2,250 MD MD Nuclear Posture Review, NPR (2) (3) MD NMD MD BPI 44
46 WMD MD MD MD MD MD ICBM SS ICBM SS-27 M (3) SLBM START ICBM START START- ABM START- MD 45
47 20 ICBM 5 A ICBM 31 MD MRV MIRV SLBM (4) TMD MD NATO MD MD MAD ABM MAD MAD 46
48 MAD MD MAD MAS (5) (4) MD NMD TMD TMD NTWD TMD ABM 4 NMD TMD MD BPI (6) BPI ICBM 3 ABM 9 BPI 47
49 TMD NMD MD MD 3 TMD MD (1) MD 9.11 L. J. Korb & A. Tiersky The End of Unilateralism? Arms Control After Sept. 11, Arms Control Today, Oct. 2001, pp.3-7. (2) (3) Russian Nuclear Forces, 2001, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, May/June 2001, pp (4) Chinese Nuclear Nuclear Forces, 2001, Ibid., Sept./Oct. 2001, pp (5) M. MAD MAS (6)
18 2 2016 2 5 6 Robert S. Ross 7 Charles L. Glaser 8 Susan Shirk 9 10 5 David Shambaugh, China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order Internationa
revisionist power status quo power 1 Aaron Friedberg 2 John J. Mearsheimer 3 4 David Shambaugh 2005 1 Alastair Iain Johnston, Is China a Status Quo Power? International Security, vol. 27, no. 4, (Spring
1945 1939 1947 2001 24
2344 2001 Why the US-Soviet Cold War Lasted for so Many Years MOTOBAYASHI Yoshimasa ) Key words Cold War Nuclear Wepons System Nuclear Armament Race Strategy for Nuclear Warfare MAD Doctrine U.S.-Soviet
„h‹¤.05.07
Japanese Civilian Control in the Cold War Era Takeo MIYAMOTO In European and American democratic countries, the predominance of politics over military, i.e. civilian control, has been assumed as an axiom.
冷戦後の戦略環境変化とクリントン政権
1998 11 3558 1 21 2 1 Paul D. Wolfowitz, Clinton s First Year, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 73, No. 15 (January/February, 1994). 2 91 36 3 91 G-7 G-7 4 G-7 5 (primacy) 6 1949 1950 1962 10 71 89 11 91 12 3 James
(2) (3) 2 vs vs (9) Edward Mansfield and Jack Snyder, Democratization and War, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74, No
MEMOIRS OF SHONAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Vol. 39, No. 1, 2005 * Nationalism and National Security Masanori HASEGAWA* This article considers nationalism in terms of national security. Nationalism has been
( 6 ) ( ) ( ) * 3 ( ) CIS 4 CIS ( ) ( 21 ) ( ) ( 30 ) * 4 CIS CIS * 3 Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy 9 (1992) Vidomos
1990 7 16 1991 10 24 7 START-1 12 1992 5 23 START-1 START-1 ICBM 176 1240 * 1 NPT NPT START-1 NPT START-1 NPT 1994 11 1996 6 * 2 6 * 1 6 SS-19 90 SS-19 40 10 SS-24 46 (Borys Kozhyn, Bezpeka Ukrainy ta
002 004 006 010 012 013 014 017 018 11 002 1 003 1 004 1 005 1 006 1 007 1 008 1 009 1 010 1 011 1 012 1 013 1 014 1 015 1 016 1 017 1 018018 1 019 - Summer - 020 021 022 023 024 026 036 042 050 054 057
CSIS 4 the Asia-Pacific, or the Indo-Pacific region Asia s Democratic Security Diamond 7 11 sea-faring democracies Lake Beijing
1 nifty 2010 2012 3 4 2011 6 20 9 24 1 2 2. 2013 1 3 5 3 2-25- 1 2 23 CSIS 4 the Asia-Pacific, or the Indo-Pacific region 5 2 28 6 12 27 Asia s Democratic Security Diamond 7 11 sea-faring democracies Lake
- March SCB -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,,,,,, -, -, -, -,, -,,,, -,,,,,, - -,, -,, Survey of Current Business, July, Table (p. ), Oct, Table (p. ) S.
- March SCB -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -,,,,,, -, -, -, -,, -,,,, -,,,,,, - -,, -,, Survey of Current Business, July, Table (p. ), Oct, Table (p. ) S.C.B. July, Table SCB, -, - - -, -, - -,,,, - Ibid.,
Microsoft Word - 折り込み資料-福岡.doc
BMD -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 04 BM 06 PAC3 PAC2PAC3 1 1 1-1 600 4 1 6 24 384 PAC3 400 94 06 X S BM BM RC-135 WC-135 BM / MD BMD-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs
BIS FRB BIS BIS FRB QE QE -February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs GDP GDP........ GDP BIS, 83rd Annual Report, June 2013, p.14 Ibid., p.14. -February 1 1 2009 2013 2) 2009 2013 2) -7.6-4.0
8 06 NCTCNational Counterterrorism Center 46 89 074 07 07 1945 1952 1960 20028 1998 1974 Arms Control Today 1964 1945 20052 200610 20093 20095 20099 200911 Department of Defense Proliferation: Threat and
2 Web Security for the Enterprise
The Web Security Authority. Web Security for the Enterprise: How to increase protection against port 80 threats White Paper 2 Web Security for the Enterprise How to increase protection against port 80
国連安全保障理事会の拒否権―安保理改革問題に関連して―
2004 9 21 59 1 59 190 148 2 2003 3 2 15 3 2 1 1 4 24 1 39 41 42 5 5 5 5 1 59 2. 2004.10.4. 3 4 5 79 4,1980.10,pp.35-36. 1 27 6 15 9 9 5 7 (the
33 1 5 6 15 7 3 9 1 2 3 1 9 20 1 3 2002 56 1 1791 4 1946 1948 1949 1972 1899 1907 1919 1928 1945 3 2 150 3 48 75 22 10 6 51 40 25 12 14 1 3 7 17 7 16 96 62 26 28 9a 1 53 11 8 173 185 2 54 1990 162 1983
5
8 1kg U-235 20 IAEA IAEA 7 4.3 2003 10 79 IAEA 1 2004 2 2 IAEA IAEA IAEA IAEA IAEA 2003 10 NPT NPT 3 2004 1 4 3 5 IAEA 8.1 8.1.1 IAEA IAEA 1957 IAEA 1 IAEA 2 IAEA 3 Iran s Pact: Full Cooperation, The New
- Margin of Safety V. Cha & D. Kang, Nuclear North Korea J. Pollack,The United States, North Korea, and the End of the Agreed Framework V. Cha Hawk En
The Second North Korean Nuclear Crisis Revised from the Perspective of Defensive Realism CHOI, Jung Hoon The Second North Korean Nuclear Crisis emerged due to the testimony given by J. Kerry, Assistant
橡核の軍事利用と商業利用.PDF
( ) 20 1985 X 1901 1 X ( ) (1) 1963.8.5 1964.10.16 1968.7.1 (NPT) 1970.1.1 1972.5 1 (SALTI) 1974.5.18 1976.6.8 NPT 1979.3.28 1979.6 SALTII (2) 1986.4.26 1987.12 (INF) 1989.11 1991.7 1 (STARTI) 1991.12
PowerPoint Presentation
() ..... 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 36% 43% 47% 47% 48% 46% 45%..... GDPGNP... GDPIMF 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 31% 30% 28% 26% 24% 23% 21% 19%... : NCTCNational Counterterrorism
核開発問題をめぐる中国の北朝鮮政策―2002年10月～2005年11月―
2005 9 2002 10 1 2 5 3 4 2005 9 19 3 2002 10 16 10 James A. Kelly 50 1994 10 4 1 -ISSUE BRIEF-No.406, 2002.12.5 2 2002 10 2003 4 3 7 2003 8 4 U.S. Department of State, Press Statement, Richard Boucher,
untitled
c OR&SA OR&SA 2 OR&SA (Polarity) OR&SA 1. 1) 2) OR&SA 2 3) 2 OR&SA 2014 7 [1] 1) 2) 3) 153 8648 2 2 1 4) 5) 6) 1980 1990 2000 2. 234 36 Copyright c by ORSJ. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is
The Democratic People s Republic of Korea: DPRK GDP G Bergsten Wang,
The China-DPRK Relations and Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture JIN, Xianghai After the Chonan incident of, leaving an enormous impact on the Korean Peninsula and in the Northeast Asia region, the two
1970). Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C. and R. D. Willig (1982); Contestable Markets and The Theory of Industry Structure, 1982. Caves, R. and M. E. Porter (1977); From entry barriers to mobility barriers:
52 立教アメリカン スタディーズ Obama 2008:
オバマ政権と 変革 の課題 The Obama Administration's Agenda for "Change" 対外政策 特にラテンアメリカ政策を中心とした歴史的視点からの考察 An Analysis of Its Foreign, Particularly Latin American, Policy from a Historical Perspective 上村直樹 KAMIMURA
日 本 のFTA 政 策 をめぐる 国 内 政 治 : JSEPA 交 渉 プロセスの Title 分 析 Author(s) 金, ゼンマ Citation 一 橋 法 学, 7(3): 683-719 Issue 2008-11 Date Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/16369
3 RMA Williamson Murray 1 service 1 Geoffrey Till, Adopting the Aircraft Carrier: The British, American and Japanese Case Studies, in Military Innovation in the Interwar Period, ed. Williamson Murray and
本組よこ／本組よこ＿古川＿Ｐ２８９－３１０
289 THEODORE McNELLY, Witness to the TWENTIETH CENTURY The Life Story of a Japan Specialist THEODORE McNELLY, Witness to the TWENTIETH CENTURY The Life Story of a Japan Specialist Xlibris Corporation Contemporary
140 NDPG Defense of Japan 2010, pp. 2-3.
9 9/11 1 NDPG 10 NDPG 1976 1995 2004 2004 NDPG 2 NDPG 2010 12 2009 8 3 2011 3 11 1 Yasuaki Chijiwa, Japan s Security Outlook: Its Implications for the Defense Policy, in Asia Pacific Countries Security
日本国憲法における「社会福祉」
No.22 2001 11 Abstract The usage of the term social welfare started after the World War II in Japan, in article 25 of the Constitution enacted in 1946. The term appeared while the Diet was debating on
201/扉
Mohammad Reza SARKAR ARANI Associate Professor, Allameh Tabatabai University Visiting Research Scholar, International Research Center for Japanese Studies 200718 Mohammad Reza SARKAR ARANI Visiting Research
TAKASAKI-CITY GUIDE BOOK NEW TAKASAKI-CITY GUIDE BOOK 1 7 8 4 5 6 2 3
TAKASAKI-CITY GUIDE BOOK TAKASAKI-CITY GUIDE BOOK NEW TAKASAKI-CITY GUIDE BOOK 1 7 8 4 5 6 2 3 TAKASAKI-CITY GUIDE BOOK TAKASAKI-CITY GUIDE BOOK TAKASAKI-CITY GUIDE BOOK TAKASAKI-CITY GUIDE BOOK TAKASAKI-CITY
米軍の変革と在日米軍の再編
2003 1 5 4 9 Unified Combatant Command 2 3 30 10 4 5 1 2001 1,757 925 832 18,217 5,449 12,768 13,392 6,584 6,808 18,212 2,712 15,500 51,578 6 10 1 1986 38 1,200 2003 11 6 57,300 The International Institute
Microsoft Word - 08_O'Brien_J_最終.doc
1942 6 2 1944 6 1943 2 2 1943 1943 / 109 1943 5 1 1941 12 7 4 1 1944 1 1 1 1942 5 8 1942 6 7 1942 9 15 1942 10 26 8 1942 12 1943 2 1943 4 1943 5 1943 8 1943 11 1943 11 1944 1 The United States Navy at
三税協力の実質化 : 住民税の所得税閲覧に関する国税連携の効果
Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title 三 税 協 力 の 実 質 化 : 住 民 税 の 所 得 税 閲 覧 に 関 する 国 税 連 携 の 効 果 Author(s) Suzuki, Ushio, 鈴 木, 潮 Citation 経 済 学 論 究, 65(4): 175-197 Issue Date 2012-03-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/9133
1980 30 1 20 1968 1968 1968 199-246 1979 Social Change and Fundamental Law: America s Evolving Constitution 1979 1984 Nuclear Weapons and Law 1984 235-251 1984 377-384 1984 63 181-206 1984 1 9 8 4 41 1243-1309
(Western European Union WEU) (EU ) (European Defence Com munity EDC) 54 (European Community EC) EU WEU WEU NATO EU NATO (NATO or Nothing) 90 11 (Treat
North Atlantic Council NAC ) 98 12 EU 99 12 2003 60 ( ) (Political and Security Committee) (Military Committee) 2000 NATO EU NATO (du plication) (European Army)
untitled
ﾈGﾈ^ﾈbﾈdﾈjﾈZﾈZﾈW ﾈC ﾇ Oleg A Timofeev THE CONCEPTS POWER ｦ AND FORCE ｦ IN MODERN THEORIES OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS V ( ); 675028 21 E-mail: timooa@mailru Mr Oleg A Timofeev V PhD in History Senior Researcher
Huawei G6-L22 QSG-V100R001_02
G6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1 2 3 17 4 5 18 UI 100% 8:08 19 100% 8:08 20 100% 8:08 21 100% 8:08 22 100% 8:08 ********** 23 100% 8:08 Happy birthday! 24 S S 25 100% 8:08 26 http://consumer.huawei.com/jp/
目次
199921 23 23 24 P-3C 2000 11 15 ROE 1 1 12 159 199910 12 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 158 3 12 10 4 12 158 5 156 157 6 157 7 11 11 National Guard of the United States 8 Air National Guard 9 10 364,000 109,700 11 United
\615L\625\761\621\745\615\750\617\743\623\6075\614\616\615\606.PS
osakikamijima HIGH SCHOOL REPORT Hello everyone! I hope you are enjoying spring and all of the fun activities that come with warmer weather! Similar to Judy, my time here on Osakikamijima is
『広島平和科学』24 (2002) pp
25 (2003) pp. 123-143 ISSN0386-3565 Hiroshima Peace Science 25 (2003) A Comparative Sociological Study of Peace Museums and Military Museums Toshifumi MURAKAMI Kyoto University of Education Affiliated
PDFŠpŒ{Ł¶
Shinkin Central Bank Monthly Review 2003.12 hinkin Central Bank Monthly Review 200312 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Community Banker 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
はじめにお読みください
START 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 @ 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 & @ 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 & 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68