Similar documents
大規模データベースを用いた信用リスク計測の問題点と対策(変数選択とデータ量の関係)

BIS CDO CDO CDO CDO Cifuentes and O Connor[1] Finger[6] Li[8] Duffie and Garleânu[4] CDO Merton[9] CDO 1 CDO CDO CDS CDO three jump model Longstaff an

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN

text.dvi



CDOのプライシング・モデルとそれを用いたCDOの特性等の考察: CDOの商品性、国内市場の概説とともに

untitled


相互取引に伴う債権債務の依存構造を考慮した金融機関の与信評価について

イントロ

カルマンフィルターによるベータ推定( )

untitled


A ,000 7,539 7,593

わが国企業による株主還元策の決定要因:配当・自社株消却のインセンティブを巡る実証分析

b-platz press(ビープラッツ プレス)vol120

繝励Μ繝ウ繝

01.Œk’ì/“²fi¡*

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題


Excelfl—‘ãŁª’Í-flO“Z

untitled

untitled

() ( ) ( ) (1996) (1997) (1997) EaR (Earning at Risk) VaR ( ) ( ) Memmel (214) () 2 (214) 2

Vol

2 A A 3 A 2. A [2] A A A A 4 [3]

12„”‡Pfiú“ƒ-PDFŠp

x T = (x 1,, x M ) x T x M K C 1,, C K 22 x w y 1: 2 2

L Y L( ) Y0.15Y 0.03L 0.01L 6% L=(10.15)Y 108.5Y 6%1 Y y p L ( 19 ) [1990] [1988] 1

Mizuho Industry Focus Vol

11号経営技術レポート「キャッシュフローについて」.PDF

.n.s.N.._...{.\1

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199

03.Œk’ì

Z...QXD (Page 1)

本邦国債価格データを用いたゼロ・クーポン・イールド・カーブ推定手法の比較分析

untitled

JORSJ05-61_2_pdf.dvi

エネルギー業界における競争優位の


untitled

07_7„”“ƒ_…p…h…b…N

211 ‚æ2fiúŒÚ

上場変更と株価:株主分散と流動性変化のインパクト


財務情報

瀬田唐橋景観検討について

OR2017_curlingRating.dvi

Research on decision making in multi-player games with imperfect information

untitled

TOP MESSAGE BUSINESS SUMMARY

CP BBB A 3 1

untitled

1 企業評価とは何か 格付け (Credit Rating) を視野に入れて Valuation Valuation valuation AAA DCF Discounted Cash Flow Wealth DCF 49


1 1.1 Merton(1974) Black and Cox (1976) PD Probability of Default LGD Loss Given Default 1 EAD Exposure At Default II Merton (1974) Merton Merton Gesk

1

43 2 PD DR Sommar and Shahnazarianka [19] Simons and Rolwes [17] GDP Figlewski, Frydman and Liang [7] GDP Bonfim [2] 3 Bhattacharjee et al. [1] 2002 [

信用リスクモデリング ケーススタディ

1 1.1 Merton (1974) Black and Cox (1976) PD Probability of Default LGD Loss Given Default 1 EAD Exposure At Default II Merton (1974) Merton Merton Ges

& 3 3 ' ' (., (Pixel), (Light Intensity) (Random Variable). (Joint Probability). V., V = {,,, V }. i x i x = (x, x,, x V ) T. x i i (State Variable),

e 7 d d - - a 7 a - 6 Inormation b a

春期講座 ~ 極限 1 1, 1 2, 1 3, 1 4,, 1 n, n n {a n } n a n α {a n } α {a n } α lim n an = α n a n α α {a n } {a n } {a n } 1. a n = 2 n {a n } 2, 4, 8, 16,

31 33

yamato_2016_0915_色校_CS3.indd

広報さっぽろ 2016年8月号 厚別区

1

ohpmain.dvi

PDF


IBM-Mode1 Q: A: cash money It is fine today 2

To Our Shareholders 1

ワークショップ「国際財務報告基準(IFRS)と企業行動:IFRSアドプションのインパクト」の模様

A

2

Plural bookkeep using Exchange Algebra Yuji Onuki (University of tsukuba) Key Words:,,, 1 Deguchi(2004) 2 (1984) Staszkiewicz(2011) SNA n n r 1,1 < Na

<テーマ>

Vol. 3 No (Mar. 2010) An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koich

23_02.dvi

X X X Y R Y R Y R MCAR MAR MNAR Figure 1: MCAR, MAR, MNAR Y R X 1.2 Missing At Random (MAR) MAR MCAR MCAR Y X X Y MCAR 2 1 R X Y Table 1 3 IQ MCAR Y I

0226_ぱどMD表1-ol前

和RIMNo.22高安氏.indd

untitled

CW3_AX094D06.indd

(2004 ) 2 (A) (B) (C) 3 (1987) (1988) Shimono and Tachibanaki(1985) (2008) , % 2 (1999) (2005) 3 (2005) (2006) (2008)

IS1-09 第 回画像センシングシンポジウム, 横浜,14 年 6 月 2 Hough Forest Hough Forest[6] Random Forest( [5]) Random Forest Hough Forest Hough Forest 2.1 Hough Forest 1 2.2

, 1), 2) (Markov-Switching Vector Autoregression, MSVAR), 3) 3, ,, , TOPIX, , explosive. 2,.,,,.,, 1

FR

..,,,, , ( ) 3.,., 3.,., 500, 233.,, 3,,.,, i

ir資料4 2.ai

資産価値の長期記憶性を考慮したマートンモデルの拡張

_CS5.indd

a m 1 mod p a km 1 mod p k<s 1.6. n > 1 n 1= s m, (m, = 1 a n n a m 1 mod n a km 1 mod n k<sn a 1.7. n > 1 n 1= s m, (m, = 1 r n ν = min ord (p 1 (1 B

untitled

山形大学紀要

(1)2004年度 日本地理

Title 最適年金の理論 Author(s) 藤井, 隆雄 ; 林, 史明 ; 入谷, 純 ; 小黒, 一正 Citation Issue Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL

研究シリーズ第40号

わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―

Transcription:

202 2 9 Vol. 9 yasuhisa.toyosawa@mizuho-cb.co.jp 3 3

Altman968 Z Kaplan and Urwitz 979 Merton974 Support Vector Machine SVM 20 20 2

SVM i s i x b si t = b x i i r i R * R r (R,R, L,R ), R < R < L < R i 2 K 2 K s i a k Pr(r i = Rk ) = + exp( (s i + a )) + exp( (s k i + a k )) N(*) Pr( r i = Rk) = N(a k s i) N(a k s ) i i rˆ i = arg maxpr(r i = x) x 200200220 Multi model 20Multi model 3

One model AIC SBCSchwarz One model EBITDA/ CF CF Debt/EBITDA EBITDA / / / 4

X: Log( ) Debt EBITDA EBITDA/ EBITDA = ( ) EBITDA EBITDA/ X 2 : X 3 : EBITDA EBITDA 2 X 4 : EBITDA X 5 : / X 6 : 3 5 NTT JR JT 2 Microsoft Excel Stdev 5

I * X7 : X8 : X9 : I I I {NTTJRJT} { } { } I * X0 : I { } AAAAA+BBB. 2. Accuracy RatioAR AR AR 6

Cumulative accuracy profilecap CAP X 30% Y 30% %,000 300 X 30% 300 300 Y 00% 2 CAP X 30%Y 30% 300 90 CAP X 30%Y 30% CAP Cumulative accuracy profiles 00 50 %% 0 0 50 00 AR A B 0 AR = B A + B Area Under CurveAUCAUC AR Engelmann and Tasche 2003 AR AUC 7

AR = 2AUC AR R k R k+ AR AR(R k,r k+ ) AR AAR K AAR = ( AR(R k= k,r k+ )) K AAR b AAR bˆ = arg max AAR( b) b 2009AR AUC Simulated annealing SA b 2 3 2 f(r k,r k + c ) c i q i HR HR N = I N { f(rˆ, q ) } i i i = HR a HR aˆ = arg maxhr( a) a 3 Moody s Investors Service 8

SA a 20 9 202 6 R&I 395 AAA AA+ AA AA- A+ A A- BBB+ BBB BBB- BB+ BB 0 2 4 3 2 4 7 2 4 0 2 4 23 3 2 2 2 8 3 3 5 0 3 6 2 43 2 3 3 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 2 6 2 5 9 2 3 2 3 7 9 5 2 30 5 6 0 0 7 3 2 47 2 2 5 3 4 8 28 2 2 2 8 2 3 2 2 3 8 2 2 7 2 3 5 4 5 4 25 2 4 2 6 2 3 4 2 4 3 5 3 4 4 20 2 9 4 6 3 3 2 2 2 5 5 0 0 2 4 36 83 80 55 47 5 5 2 395 3 9

AAA AAA BB+ BB 9 4,5,6 Log() / 2.0x 8 0.5x 4 0.0x AA+ AA A+ A A- BBB+ BBB BB* AA+ AA A+ A A- BBB+ BBB AA- BBB- AA- BBB- BB* 75 %th 25%th 2 BB*BB+ Pacific Data EBITDA/ EBITDA / 40% 0.30x 20% 0.5x 0% 0.00x AA+ AA A+ A A- BBB+ BBB BB* AA+ AA A+ A A- BBB+ BBB AA- BBB- AA- BBB- BB* 75 %th 25%th 2 BB*BB+ Pacific Data 0

/ / 0.8x 2x 0x 0.4x 2x 0.0x 4x AA+ AA A+ A A- BBB+ BBB BB* AA+ AA A+ A A- BBB+ BBB AA- BBB- AA- BBB- BB* 75 %th 25%th 2 BB*BB+ Pacific Data AAR SA AAR 7 95% 93.2 90% 85% 0,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 0,000 AAR % AR % AA AA- A+ A A- BBB+ BBB BBB- 93.2 97.9 94.9 94.3 93.2 90. 89.0 87.2 94.0 AAR 93%

8 AR 87% X Log() 7 8.3 X6 8 2.7 X2 / 4 3.2 X7 NTT,JR,JT 4.8 X3 EBITDA/ 2 0.7 X4 EBITDA/ 27.4 X5 / 3 0.3 X8, 2 3. X9 4 0.8 X0 0.5 9 s = 7X + 4X 4X 7 2 + 2X + 2X 8 3 + 4X 9 27X 4 0X 3X 0 5 + 8X 6 2 0 20 Multi model 88.9% 93.9% 00% 90% 93.9% 80% 70% 0,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 0,000 2

90% 2 5 80% 4 > % > % 0 0 0 -- 47 43 4 9 0 00 28 23 5 82 7 7 0 00 8 8 0 00 23 23 0 00 0 9 3 3 0 00 7 6 94 8 7 88 25 20 5 80 43 42 98 4 3 75 5 5 0 00 0 00 2 2 0 00 6 6 0 00 2 2 0 00 4 4 0 00 0 8 2 80 20 20 0 00 6 6 0 00 6 6 0 00 9 9 0 00 9 2 82 3 3 0 00 5 5 0 00 30 29 97 395 37 24 94 AA+ AA AA- A+ A A- BBB+ BBB BBB- BB* 8 9 39 34 78 77 53 45 7 37 > 2 2 2 2 5 3 2 2 4 0 24 0 2 4 36 83 80 55 47 5 7 395 % 80 90 95 94 94 96 96 96 73 00 94 BB*BB+ 2 AA+ BBB- 90% One model 4 20,000 5,000 5,000 76% 3

3,000,000,000,000,000 z XX4 0 = 7ΔX Δ 4 ΔX2 + 2 ΔX3 27 X4 X3EBITDA/ X4EBITDA / 0 = 7(Log(,000 +,000z) Log(,000)),000 +,000( z) 4( 3,000,000 ) 2,000 + 2ΔX 27Δ 3 X 4 4 7 7Log( + z) + z = 2ΔX + 27Δ 3 3 3 X 4 3 X4=+5% 5 5 EBITDA EBITDA / 4

X3= 5% 42%,000,420 % X4: EBITDA/ 22 +5.0 +2.5 0.0 2.5 5.0 X3 +5.0 27 20 4 8 2 EBITDA/ +2.5 3 24 8 5 0.0 34 28 2 5 9 2.5 38 3 25 8 2 5.0 42 35 28 22 6 0% 2%,000,20,000,790 3 One model 5

94% Altman, Edward L. 968, Financial Ratios, Discriminant Analysis and Prediction of Corporate Bankruptcy, The Journal of Finance, Vol.23, pp.589-609 Engelmann, Bernd and D. Tasche 2003, Testing rating accuracy, CREDIT RISK, RISK JANUARY 2003, pp.82-86 Gentle, James E. 2005, Random Number Generation and Monte Carlo Methods, Springer Hardle, Wolfgang, R. Moro and D. Schafer 2007, Estimating Probabilities of Default With Support Vector Machines, SFB 649 ECONOMIC RISK Kaplan, R. S. and G. Urwitz 979, Statistical model of bond ratings: A methodological inquiry, The Journal of Business, Vol.52, pp.23-26 200,,, 20,,, Liu, Jon S. 2008, Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing, Springer Merton, Merton C. 974, On the Pricing of Corporate Debt: The Risk Structure of Interest Rates, The Journal of Business, Vol.29, pp.87-895 6

2009, AUC AR, FSA 5, pp.29-48 2002,, 50 2, yasuhisa.toyosawa@mizuho-cb.co.jp 7

9 202 No.6 24 2 9-3-3 Tel. (03) 5222-5075