April
3, 1999 1999, 37
1999, 38 1999, 38
2004, 70 2004, 69
1998b, 37 1998b, 38-39
1998b, 43
1998b, 40 (1998b) (1999) (1999) (2006) 2006, 19
(2002) (2006) (2006) (2006) http://www.cae.org Released in Feb. 21, 2007
2006, 25 2006, 25
MIT
1998 1999 1998 1999 Dec. 2000
2000, 59 2005b 2000, 60 2005a 43-44 Sept. 13, 2006, 22
2000, 63 2001, 66 2001, 67 (1996-1998) 2000, 61 2005a, 50~51
2005b 2000, 62 IT 2004 2004 2005 b 2000, 60 2005a, 136~138 2005a
(2002) (2006) Sept. 12, 2006, 26; Sept. 19, 2006, 22 2005a137 cf. 2005a, 62 Sept. 21, 2006, 22
Sept. 26, 2006, 26 2005a, 61, 63 OB (1998)
(1998) 1998, 12 14 15 15 OB 2006 2006, 98-99
OB 2004 2005a, 108 cf. Sept. 20, 2006, 22 2001, 64 OB 2000, 62 2000, 63 2001, 67
2005a 171-172 2005a 175
1999 1999 2000 (1999) (2000)
2000 Jun. 6, 2006, 1 Jun. 19, 2004, 13
Sept. 7, 2006, 22 Jun. 24, 2005, 5 2005a, 124-130 Oct. 4, 2006, 22 Jul. 24, 1990, 16 Apr. 28, 1994, 9 Apr. 10, 2001, 38
(SPC) June. 19, 2004, 13;Feb. 1, 2007, 1 Oct. 11, 2006, 22
Nov. 2, 2006, 1
(2005)
(fiduciary responsibility)
(2003) 2003, 39 2003, 88 (2003) 2003, 23-40 endowment funds (2003) 2005
1999; 2001 2001b, 8; 2001, 17 7; 18 7; 18-198
(2005) (2006) (2007) 2005 (2005) 2005, 23
MIT http://www.nacubo.org Released in Jan. 22, 2007 Carnegie Classification 2005 http://www.carnegiefoundation.org Graduate Instructional Program Table Mar. 27, 2007, 95-97. (2006a) 19822006 (2006b) IDE 484, Oct. 2006, 4-11 (2004)1, July 2004, pp. 171-185 (2006)IDE 484, Oct. 2006, 11-15 (2006) SAPIO July 26, 2006, 82-84 (1999)
Aug. 31, 1999, 65-66 (1994) Sept. 19, 1994, 6-7 (2004) 2004 (1998)Feb. 23, 1998, 8-9 (1999) Aug. 31, 1999, 63-64 (2004) Mar. 9, 2004, 12 (1998)Jan. 1998, 12-15 (2004) Jan. 2004, 80-83 (2006) Jul. 2006, 96-99 (2007) Jan. 2007, 34-37 (2001)Mar. 2001, 72-81 (2002a) Jan. 2002 (2002b) 290, Apr. 2002, 2-8 (2006a) 344, Oct. 2006, 21-24 (2006b) 345, Nov. 2006, 10-13 (2007) Mar. 27, 2007, 99 (2003)41 (10), Oct. 2003, 43-54 (2004a) April 2004, 40-59 (2004b)2004 (2003)2003 (2001a)30 (6), Jun. 2001, 3-5 (2001b) 30 (6), Jun. 2001, 6-10
(2004) 1, July 2004, 71-82 (1998a)998, Jan. 1998, 68-70 (1998b) May 1998, 36-43 (1999)April 3, 1999, 36-38 (2003) 2003 (2004) Jan. 2004, 66-71 (2006) 2006 (2005)345, Nov. 2005, 2-9 (2007) 2007 (2002) Nov. 2002, 216-222 (2001) IDE 433, Oct.-Nov. 2001, 31-36 (2006) Nov. 2, 2006, 1; Nov. 6, 1 (2007) Jan. 31, 2007, 1; Feb. 1, 2007, 1; Feb. 2, 2007, 1 2005 (1999) 654, Aug. 1999, 28-44 (2003) (2000) 2003 (2001) Mar. 18, 2001, 33 (2000) Dec. 2000, 58-63 (2001)Nov. 2001, 64-69 (2004)Jan. 27, 2004, 21 (2005a)
2005 (2005b) Feb. 19, 2005, 47 (2005c) Apr. 2005, 58-61 (2005d)June 20, 2005, 3; June 21, 2005, 5; June 22 2005, 5; June 23, 2005, 4; June 24, 2005, 5 (2006)Sept. 5, 2006, 22; Sept. 6, 2006, 22; Sept. 7, 2006, 22; Sept. 12, 2006, 26; Sept. 13, 2006, 22; Sept. 14, 2006, 26; Sept. 19, 2006, 22; Sept. 20, 2006, 22; Sept. 21, 2006, 22; Sept. 26, 2006, 26; Sept. 27, 2006, 22; Sept. 28, 2006, 34; Oct. 3, 2006, 26; Oct. 4, 2006, 22; Oct. 5, 2006, 22; Oct. 11, 2006, 22; Oct. 12, 2006, 26; Oct. 17, 2006, 22; Oct. 18, 2006, 30; Oct. 19, 2006, 22 (2001) 2001 (2006) 2006 (2001) 673, Mar. 2001, 20-26 (2001)30 (7) July 2001, 17-24 (2006) Oct. 2006, 114-117 (2002) Mar. 2002, 15-27 (2002)518, Nov. 2002, 71-79 (2003) 29, 2003, 19-32 (2006)IDE 484, Oct. 2006, 23-26 (2005) 334, Dec. 2005, 22-25 (2005) U-MA 21 Jul. 28, 2005 (http://www. u-ma21.com/naiyo/pdf/1005.pdf) (2006) IDE 484, Oct. 2006, 16-23
(2005) Feb. 2005 (2002) 2002 (2006) 2006 (1999)Apr. 3, 1999, 32-35, 40-44 (1996)18, May 1996, 13-24 (1999)145, Dec. 1999, 65-119 (2004) 165, Jun. 2004, 89-129 (2006) 173, Dec. 2006, 1-51 (2002)291, May 2002, 22-25 (2005) 2, Aug. 2005, 29-39 (2005)34 (12), Dec. 2005, 21-23 (2005) 329, July 2005, 19-23 (2007) Mar. 8, 2007, 1; Mar. 13, 2007, 1 (2000) Apr. 21, 2000, 133-135 (2001)IDE 433, Oct.-Nov. 2001, 36-41 (2006)3, Aug. 2006, 177-189 (1998) May 1998, 32-35 (2005) 2005 (2003) S&P 304, Jun. 2003, 4-10
(2003) (2001) 2003 Hiroshi Fukumitsu is a professor of financial management at Seijo University, Tokyo. In this paper he reviews major discussions on the management of Japanese private universities after nineteen nineties. Facing the decrease of youth population after 1992 and the deepening deflation, some universities tried to find their way to survive in a close-tie up with local communities and other ones to cut their working budget denying any vested interests. He has chosen Ryuji Komatsu (Keio University) and Shotaro Seki (Waseda University) as representative disputants of the problem. He thinks that the management of universities will be a matter of national concern in the near future. URL: http://happytown.orahoo.com/libraries-tokyo E-mail: fukumitu@seijo.ac.jp