pp.353-362 2016 doi: 10.5057/jjske.TJSKE-D-15-00081 Comparisons of Interests in Streetscapes between Residents and Visitors Experiment in Kaminoyama Kohei NOMOTO and Daisuke SATO Yamagata University, 4-3-16 Jonan, Yonezawa, Yamagata 992-8510, Japan Abstract : Walking in a city, people look at streetscapes and many objects along the street. They are everyday sights for the residents of the city, whereas seeing them is a brand-new experience for the visitors. The visitors sometimes discover valuable attractions that the residents are not aware of consequently. An experiment was conducted in which residents and visitors walked in a city and took pictures of what they found interesting. The behavioral data and the picture data were analyzed statistically and unconscious interests of the residents and the visitors were revealed. Keywords : Streetscapes, Residents, Visitors 1. Brown 1 Otways 2 Rambonilaza 2 Monts d Arrée choice experiment method Agapito 3 Algarve Lagos 2 CHAID chi-square automatic interaction detector Lagos Imani 4 Isfahn Alghero 2004 Concu 5 Received: 2015.09.18 / Accepted: 2016.02.15 J-STAGE Advance Published Date: 2016.04.13 Copyright 2016 All Rights Reserved. 353
CM choice model 6 AHP Analytic Hierarchy Process 7 KJ 8 1 2 5-7 3 4 8 1-3 5 6 4 7 8 8 2. 2.1 32,000 9 700m 600m 1 2014 1 10 3 9 1 354
2.2 3 15 17 12 13 1 32.026.2 2.3 1 20 2 60 15 30 2.4 60 1 20 8 2 10 3. 3.1 68 1 3.2 passing rate 68 2 Passage rate 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Section Passage rate 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Section 2 355
4 3 68 3 S4 S4 F4 S4 0.8 0.8 6 A5 A6 G4 S2 F5 A4 W3 0.4 3.4 3.3 5 photographing rate 0 68 4 0.0 68 5 0 10 1 0.5 5 6 6S2 W2 F1 G4 S5 U1 S2 W2 F1 G4 S5 U1 356
6 0.5 7 0.25 3.4 7 8 1 S4 3.2 A4 W3 2 S2 F1 W2 G4 3 Q2 S6 U1 Q2 S6 0.50 0.670.31 0.50 U1 0.67 0.63 0.62 0.25 4 D1 F7 D1 0.42 0.00 0.62 0.75 F7 0.33 0.25 0.77 0.50 8 3.5 1 2 S2 F1 W2 G4 S2 9 F1 10 W2 11 G4 357
9S2 13S6 10F1 14U1 11W2 12G4 12 3 S6 U1 S6 13 S2 U1 F4 F5 F6 F7 14 4 D1 F7 D1 15 F7 16 15D1 16F7 358
1 5 D1 F7 4. 4.1 13 3 average height ratio 17 95% ** 1% * 5% 70% 1.5-2.5 m 1 2 1.5 m 2.5 m1% 1 1.5m 1.5m, 1 2 2.5m 2.5m 1 2 18 18 2.5 m 1 2 30% 1.5-2.5m 1% 0-1.5m1% 4.2 Hall 410 Intimate distance 0-45cm Personal distance 45-120cmSocial distance 1.2-3.6mPublic distance 3.6m 3 3 average distance ratio 19 5% 17 19 359
20 20 1% 4.3 26 6 average category ratio 21 1% buildings storefrons street furnitures natures streets signs 2 21 22 22 5. 360
8 1.5-2.5m 1.5m 2.5m 9 10 10 28 6. 1 Brown G., Raymond C.: The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment, Applied Geography, 27, pp.39-111, 2007. 2 Rambonilaza M., Dachary-Bernard J.: Land-use planning and public preferences What can we learn from choice experiment method?, Landscape and Urban Planning, 83, pp.318-326, 2007. 3 Agapito D., Mendes J.C., Valle P.O.: Chapter 6 Destination image: perspectives of tourists vs. residents, in Silva J.A, Scott J.J.N.: Tourism development and management, 361
Uneversidade do Algarve, pp.117-140, 2010. 4 Imani F., Tabaeian M.: Recreating mental image with the aid of cognitive maps and its role in environmental perception, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, pp.53-62, 2012. 5 Concu N., Atzeni G.: Conflicting preferences among tourists and residents, Tourism Management, 33, pp.1293-1300, 2012. 6 46 3 pp.223-228 2007 7 40066 pp.143-144 2012 8 27 2 pp.561-569 2015 9 http://www.city.kaminoyama.yamagata.jp/ 10 4 pp.55-80 2015 1981 1983 2003-2009 2007-2009 2009 IEEE 2015 362