文部科学省科学研究費補助金特定領域研究B

Similar documents
Preliminary Version Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Me

商業学会発表資料( ).ppt

DV-0001_センダイウイルス(SeV)ミニゲノムベクター調整キット(120425_ver._2.3)

2 3

08医療情報学22_1_水流final.PDF


H1-H4*.ai


Becker 1965 Gronau a a a

JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 114 Vol.29 No.22009

untitled

アジ研教科書「マクロ安定化」.PDF


16

26 No.62 Contents No.62

P.5 P.6 P.3 P.4 P.7 P.8 P.9 P.11 P.19

97-00



表1-表4宅建99.indd

表1-表4宅建98.indd

表1-表4宅建101.indd

表1-表4宅建いわて-表紙.indd


‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹

untitled

2

4703ALL01

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step


DP

,398 4% 017,

退職互助だより_cs6.indd

表紙最終

2

Microsoft Excelを用いた分子軌道の描画の実習

untitled

白山の自然誌21 白山の禅定道

WE7281_help





A B C E ( ) F

平成16年度 市政年報

Micro-D 小型高密度角型コネクタ

J-D Lounge

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

Microarray Data Analysis Tool Ver3.0 Manual.doc



SEJulyMs更新V7

-4


1 2 40/ a M. W. 14, 1990, R. Stevens, Medical Practice in Modern England, Yale University Press, 1966B , 1981F. Honigsba

橡表紙参照.PDF

ver11_B06-B07_kyozaisakusei.indd

人文論究60-2(よこ)(P)☆/2.中島

4 2 p = p(t, g) (1) r = r(t, g) (2) p r t g p r dp dt = p dg t + p g (3) dt dr dt = r dg t + r g dt 3 p t p g dt p t r t = Benefit view dp

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

名称未設定-1

北辰同窓会36号-02.21修正


日経テレコン料金表(2016年4月)

B

73 p p.152


_Print

122011pp

A p A p. 224, p B pp p. 3.

p

Microsoft Word - 映画『東京裁判』を観て.doc

9

() L () 20 1

戦後の補欠選挙

Microsoft Word - 田中亮太郎.doc

2

スラヴ_00A巻頭部分

308 ( ) p.121

広報かみす 平成28年6月15日号

.

1

The Empirical Study on New Product Concept of the Dish Washer Abstract

untitled

1) , 215, 1441, , 132, 1237, % College Analysis 2-4) 2



untitled

1001.indd

0007

“LŁñ‡È‡©‡ª‡í409“ƒ

STEEL_No.24_h1-4

みさき_1


2008CHORD11....



もりおか医報人7.indd

2

H21_report

Transcription:

B 1 Micro Data Analysis on the Typical Diseases 2 2001 3 ( ) By Hippocrates,,, pp. 1017-1018. 1. 1 B ( ) Dr. Theodore Hitiris (The University of York) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 Correspondence to: e-mail; ged0109@srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp (Hosoya), HZA02554@nifty.ne.jp (Hayashi), hirocky@mx2.nisiq.net (Kon-no), BYN01741@niftyserve.or.jp (Tokita). 186-8601 2-1 531. 1

65 4 2025 7 3 ( ) 4 collaboration 4 ( ) ( ) fact finding 1 ( ) 1 3 2

1 1 2 3 2 9 5 ( ) 14 ( ) ( ) 4 14 3 5 4 ICD-9 ( 9 : International Classification of Diseases) (145 ) 5 McPherson, Wennberg, Hovind, and Clifford (1982) (systematic component of variation) 3

(1983) 50 1 1 1 (1997) (1998, 4 ) ) ) ) count data 1 ( 2-a 4-a 6-a) 3 6 small area variations Cain and Diehr (1992) Gittelsohn and Powe (1995) Folland, Goodman, and Stano (1997, Ch. 10) Phelps (2000) 6 3 4

1 7 : : : ( ) 2 3 3 3.1. 3.2. 3.3. 3 ( ) 10 8 4 2. 9 9 ID 7 private 8 10 1 2 1 9 5

(5 ) 12 1 1 12 3 16 8 97 5 3. 3.1. 3.1.1. 2 8 3 2,384 1 7,781 2 1 5 10 23 5,000 ( 14 9,000 8 6,000 ) 0.2 % 50 70 10 10 ( ) 2 Web (http://www.hyo-med.ac.jp/012.html/indexmk.htm) 6

( ) 1 7 8 14 1 4 1 1 (75 79 : 60 : 47 : 47 ) ( 3) 1 ( ) 3 ( 2 ) 3 ( ) 70 11 75 79 7,300 ( : 9,800 : 2,500 ) 9 9 1,629,690 1,440,000 1,495,747 12 13 75 79 1.6 3.9 1 ( 1) ( 2) ( 6) 11 : 4 6,000 : 1 5,000 : 3 5,000 12 9 ( ) 2 8 1,797,022 0.8 13 70 74 : 18 2,000 : 11 6,000 : 15 6,000 75 79 : 11 8,000 : 7 3,000 : 9 8,000 7

3 14 4 1 10 70 100 6 1 70 1 8 1 50 2 3 8 75 15 10 70 16 70 74 7 : 4,100 : 2,600 : 5,800 16 1 ( 9) ( 13) 13 50 2 3 14 15 70 74 : 2.9 : 2.7 : 2.8 75 79 : 3.0 : 2.3 : 2.8 > > 8

17 75 ( 3 ) 2 3.1.2. ( ) 10 2-a 2-b 2-a 1 18 2-a 2-b 70 IHM3 IHM5 16.57 20.20 16 : 9,600 : 5,700 : 1 2,000 17 1 18 1 9

80 64 ( 5 ) 10 20 2-a 1 2-b 70 1 12 1 2 2 ( 2.5 ) ( ) 10

2 18 ( : 17 : 16 ) ( 20 ) 1 ( ) 2 ( 1 2-a ) : 10 10 : 10 ( 10 ) 10 11

3.2. 3.2.1. 5 10 13 3,000 7 4,000 5 9,000 0.1 40 30 700 19 1995 57.96 20 21 22 3 15 21 22 28 3 15 1 1 70 74 80 60 60 1 17 19 1 20 15.3 21 7 22 Web http://www.ncvc.go.jp/cvdinfo/sick/sick5.html 12

17 16 17 ( ) 3 70 74 5,000 7,500 2,000 1 3 23 1 15 16 17 24 18 3 1 1 19 3 26 20 1 60 23 20 18 1 17 1 22 1 3 50 23 24 13

40 4 4 2 1 23 60 24 65 45 75 60 25 3 5 40 50 2 40 50 3 22 1 22 1 3 25 25 25 3 14

26 26 5 11 15 2 5 11 15 28 26 28 1 5 1 11 15 1 3 2 1 3.2.2. 10 ( ) 15

4-a 4-b 4-a 1 4-a 4-b 10 4-a JCM1 50 2 1 26 2 2 1 1 4-a 3 26 16

4-b 10 3 2 1 1 1 4-a 1 1 1 2 3 1 3 1 1 3 1 17

1 1 1 1 3.3. 27 3.3.1. 44 9,000 23 4,000 21 4,000 0.4 70 22 28 10 20 40 80 27 ( ) ( ) ( : ) ( ) 28 8 10 18

30 50 60 10 50 5 50 29 30 29 35 36 42 5 30 20 45 70 29 31 ( ) 5 32 20 25 25 35 31 32 ( ) 33 29 1995 30 32 31 19

90 31 34 37 10 20 44 20 60 40 8 1 2 1 36 32 5 15 70 3.3.2. ( ) 10 6-a 6-b 6-a 20

1 6-a 3.3.1 50 60 60 28 29 300 30 27 26 30 6 7 2 3 1 7,000 14,000 10 10 10,000 2 1 2,000 300 60 6-a SHM1 SHF1 SCF1 21

6-b 50 1 3 4 1 1,000 73 74 7 8 2 4 1 1,000 3 4. 3 2 1 1 22

1 1 2 1 2 23

3 3 4 Cain, K. C., and P. Diehr. (1992) Testing the Null Hypothesis in Small Area Analysis, Health Services Research, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 267-294. Folland, S., A. C. Goodman., and M. Stano. (1997) The Economics of Health and Health Care, 2 nd ed., Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall. Gittelsohn, A., and N. R. Powe. (1995) Small Area Variations in Health Care Delivery in Maryland, Health Services Research, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 295-317. McPherson, K., J. E. Wennberg., O. Hovind., and P. Clifford. (1982) Small-Area Variations in the Use of Common Surgical Procedures: An International Comparison of New 24

England, England, and Norway, The New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 307, No. 21, pp. 1310-1314. Phelps, C. E. (2000) Information Diffusion and Best Practice Adoption, in A. J. Culyer and J. P. Newhouse, eds., Handbook of Health Economics, Vol. 1A, Ch.5, Amsterdam, Elsevier. (1997), Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 53-82. (1998),. (1995),. (1997) 9,. (1983), Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 56-69. 25