Communication & Writing JACET Power Presentation BKC
input output Reading Listening input, CALL output Critical Writing CWoutput CW CW JACET Power Presentation PP CW PP eye contact, gestures, posture Physical Aspectsfluency, pronunciation, volume Oral Aspectspresentation mediavisual aids Visual Aspects introduction, body, conclusion Organizational Aspects PP http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chousa/shotou//sesaku/.htm
% TOEIC TOEFL TOEIC CW JACET NecessityFavorableness Authenticity CDDVD Teaching Manual Evaluation Form
- %- %- %- % - %- %- %- % % % CD -ROM %DVD % %VHS % % % % % % PP - CW Present Yourself : ExperiencesCUP, PP CD-ROM DVD CD DVD
% % CW Pre-Intermediate Present Yourself PP CW % PP PP? PP PP JACET %
. DVD PP
DVD OHP CALL CD OHP CS %............................ internal consistency Cronbach Cronbach..
,p... p<. A B C D E F G H I J K L M N.. -.... -................ -...... -. -........................ -. -.. -....... -. *PAs=Physical Aspects, OAs=Oral Aspects, VAs=Visual Aspects, OGAs=Organizational Aspects Oral Aspects Organizational Aspects PP.
. Physical Aspects Visual Aspects.. Organizational Aspects... Organizational Aspects.. Organizational Aspects.. Oral Aspects. Oral Aspects. Oral Aspects Visual Aspects.... Oral Aspects. Oral Aspects. Oral Aspects.. PP JACET Organizational Aspects Aspects informative type persuasive type procedural format, topic-based format, spatial arrangement format PP PP PP
...... Organizational Aspects............ Physical Aspects........................ Visual Aspects.............................. Oral Aspects............ PP PP Cronbach, p. ~.... CS
...... Physical Aspects. Organizational Aspects. Visual Aspects.. Oral Aspects... CS............ Physical Aspects.... Visual Aspects... Oral Aspects................... Organizational Aspects................
, r= r =.. Oral AspectVisual Aspect PP PP PP
........ Oral Aspects................ Visual Aspects...... -. -. Physical Aspects.. -. -... -. -... -. -. Organizational Aspects.. -. -... -. -. CW JACET Power Presentation PP JACET JACET CW
JACET Power Presentation % % %,, p. -, p. / Quesion Q&A Dos
and DONTs - JACET JACET - ESP - : : - - - Comfort, J., & Utley, D., Effective Presentations,Oxford: OUP,. Cumming, M. G.,Listen, Speak, Present: A Step-by-Step Presenter's Workbook, Stanford: Cengage Learning,. Deaux, G. R., Suzuki, Y., &Shimozaki, M., Activate College English: Introductory Course, Tokyo: Ikubundo,. Elwood, K., The Way to Effective Speaking,Tokyo: Nanun-do,. Gershon, S., Present Yourself : Experiences, Cambridge: CUP,. Gershon, S., Present Yourself : Viewpoints, Cambridge: CUP,. Grussendorf, M., English for Presentations, Oxford: OUP,. Harrington, D., &LeBeau, C., Speaking of Speech, Oxford: Macmillan Languagehouse,. Harrington, D., &LeBeau, C., Speaking of Speech New Edition, Macmillan Languagehouse,. Hood, M., Dynamic Presentations, Tokyo: Pearson Longman,. JACET Materials Development Group, Power Presentation, Tokyo: Sanshusha,. Kiggell, T., Cleary K., Hitomi K. et al., Presenting Sciencendedition, Oxford: Macmillan Languagehouse,. Maritoshi, P., Basic Parts of Speech, Stanford: Cengage Learning,. McMahon, R., Presenting Different Opinions, Tokyo: Nanun-do,. MiyakoNakaya & John Pak., Speaking in Public, Tokyo: Seibido,. Okada, K., & Betts, R., Tokyo: ALC,. Powell, M., Presenting in English: How to Give Successful Presentations, Stanford: Cengage Learning,. Suzuki, Y., Do Your Own Project in EnglishVol., Tokyo: Ikubundo,.
Power Presentation
On Current Trends in the English Presentation Textbooks for Teaching Collegelevel English NISHINA YasunoriLecturer, Language Education Center, Ritsumeikan University The aim of this study is to identify the improvement factors for the current English presentation textbooks utilized for teaching college-level English. The results of this study are based on data gathered from the questionnaire survey on the English presentation textbook Power Presentation: Eigo de Presentation (Sanshusha, ), which was used as a sample. In order to evaluate the contents of the textbook under study in an objective manner, this study also presents a comparison of published English presentation textbooks, focusing on several aspects, before presenting the results of the questionnaire survey. Using these results, we can improve the quality of English presentation textbooks in the near future. material design and development, English presentation textbooks, questionnaire survey, correlation coefficient, satisfaction rating, improvement factor