20mg #tr#5*xlj lffin&+'.':, t) r+'z)vt '+D#J

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Sewices Garden AS et al. Preliminary results ofradiation Therapy Oncology Group 97-03: a randomized phase II trial of concurrent radiation and chemotherapy for advanced squamous cell carcinomas ofthe head and neck. J Clin Oncol 2004;22: 2856-2864 Suntharalingam M et al. The use ofcarboplatin and paclitaxel with daily radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 47:49-56 Hitt R et ai. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus fluorouracil to paclitaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil induction chemotherapy followed by.chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23:8636-8645 Gibson MK et al. Randomized phase III evaluation of cisplatin plus fluorouracil versus cisplatin plus paclitaxel in advanced head and neck cancer @1395): an intergroup trial of the Eastern

b'-> 1.26-2.0XUIN l35mg/m2 tj,.> 2.Ol-s.oxULN 90mg/m2

80-100 mg;/m, I F+Ffi,Rffi

l) Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 2) Garden AS et al. Preliminary results of ltadiation Therapy Oncology Group 97-03: a randomized phase II trial of concurrent radiation and chanotherapy for advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. J Clin Oncol 2004; 22: 2856:2864 3) Suntharalingam M et al. The use ofcarboplatin and paclitaxel wittr daily radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000; 47:49-56 4) Hitt R et ai. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus fluorouracil to paclitaxel, cisplati4 and fluorolracil induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005',23:8636-8645 5) Gibson MK et ai. Randomized phase III evaluation ofcisplatin plus fluorouracil versus cisplatin plus paclitaxel in advanced head and neck cancer @1395): an intergroup trial of the Eastem

i.- 1.6-75meldL

0.4ms

Amnicillin in the treatment of bacterial meninsitis P- C. Fleminng et al

Ampicillin compared with penicillin and chloramphenicol combined in the treatrnent of bacterial menineitis N. l. Girgis, et al.

Ampicillin-Cloxacillin in purulent meningitis Ampicillin dosage in bacterial meningitis with special reference to Haemophilus influenzae Greene G.R.. et al.

Lgng-acting chloramphenicol versus intravenous ampicillin for treatment ofbacterial menineitis A comparison of ceftazidime and aminoglycoside based regimens as empirical treatment in l3 16 cases of suspected sepsis in the newborn

Letters to the editor: Neonatal sepsis in Turkey: the comparison between penicillin plus aminoslvcoside and amnicillin olus third-seneration ceohalo.smrin chemothemnies Itv= GokalpAS and OguzA Ranodomized trial using piperacillin versus ampicillin and amikacin for treatment of Dremature neonates with risk factors for seosis O. Hammerberg, et al

Comparison between the combination of azlocillin-gentamicin and ampicillin-gentamicin in the treatment of a nursery population 4 71-/V D. Fogel, et al Effectiveness of ampicillin and combination of penicillin and chlorarnphenicol in the treatrnent of oneumonias: randomized controlled fiial N.Deivanayagam, el al

Chloramphenicol versus ampiiillin plus gentamicin for community acquired very severe pneumonia among children aged 2-59 months in low resource settings: multicentre randomized controlled rial (SPEAR studv) Rai Asghar, et al

(me n i n g i t i s) (sepsis)

50mg/kg A 12 ffiff,:& l. i+cks-zt a

l00mg/kg 50m94(g