2016年熊本地震 地震調査委員会の報告

Similar documents
京都大学防災研究所年報第 60 号 A 平成 29 年 DPRI Annuals, No. 60 A, 2017 Generating Process of the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake Yoshihisa IIO Synopsis The 2016 Kumamoto e

0-

untitled

7-1 2007年新潟県中越沖地震(M6.8)の予測について

Time Variation of Earthquake Volume and Energy-Density with Special Reference to Tohnankai and Mikawa Earthquake Akira IKAMi and Kumizi IIDA Departmen

Fig. 1. Horizontal displacement of the second and third order triangulation points accompanied with the Tottori Earthquake of (after SATO, 1973)

1793 Detailed Distributions of Seismic Intensity and Tsunami Heights of the Kansei off Miyagi Prefecture Earthquake of February 17, 1793 Yuichi NAMEGA

On the Detectability of Earthquakes and Crustal Movements in and around the Tohoku District (Northeastern Honshu) (I) Microearthquakes Hiroshi Ismi an

8km M km M M8.4 1M M M 東北地方太平洋沖で想定されていた地震 Fig % 8 9% M8. 6 3m M % Fig.1 Distribution of

Fig. 1. Active faults in the Kanto district (after Coordinating Committee for Earthquake Prediction, 1980). A-A' PROFILE DOUGUER ANOMALY RESIDUAL ANOM

km km ,620 8,360 32,261 [5] [6] [7

Detailed Spatial Distributions of Foreshock and Aftershock Activities of Small Earthquakes Kiyoshi ITO and Akio KUROISO Abuyama Seismological Observat


神奈川県西部山北南高感度地震観測井の掘削および孔内検層,Borehole Drilling and Physical Properties of the Yamakita-minami Seismic Observatory in Western Ka

* Meso- -scale Features of the Tokai Heavy Rainfall in September 2000 Shin-ichi SUZUKI Disaster Prevention Research Group, National R

Rolly E. RIMANDO *** Jessie DALIGDIG *** Arturo DAAG *** Surface Faulting Associated with the Philippine Earthquake of 1990 Takashi NAKATA *, Hiroyuki


03_資料2_清水委員講演資料

Phonetic Perception and Phonemic Percepition

Fig. 1. Restored map of the study area and its environs, eliminating valleys less than 500 m across. Squares show the area where following maps are av

8-5 中国・四国・九州地方の地殻変動


mm mm , ,000 Fig. 1 Locality map of the investigation area NE SW Fi

3 - 7 松代アレイ震源による長野県北部の地震活動の特徴: 時空間変化

2008年1月11日に岩手県釜石沖で発生した地震(M4.7)について

和文.PDF

7-3 2004年新潟県中越地震

テレビ番組による相互交流

(1) 2

平成28 年4 月16 日熊本県熊本地方の地震の評価(平成28年4月17日)

\615L\625\761\621\745\615\750\617\743\623\6075\614\616\615\606.PS

untitled

千葉県における温泉地の地域的展開

untitled

8-2 近畿・四国地方の地殻変動

〈論文〉中部圏構想の断章と高速自動車道の建設

2-1 東北地方およびその周辺の微小地震活動(1984年11月~1985年4月)

研究成果報告書

I

Microsoft Word - mitomi_v06.doc

地質調査研究報告/Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Japan

untitled


<82E682B15F8FBC88E48D828BB42E696E6464>

LAGUNA LAGUNA 10 p Water quality of Lake Kamo, Sado Island, northeast Japan, Katsuaki Kanzo 1, Ni

I I Evaluation of Fragility Functions for Tsunami Damage in Coastal District in Natori City, Miyagi Prefecture and Mitigation Effects of Coastal Dune

WASEDA RILAS JOURNAL

Studies of Foot Form for Footwear Design (Part 9) : Characteristics of the Foot Form of Young and Elder Women Based on their Sizes of Ball Joint Girth


首都直下地震における地方財政への影響

No.51 pp.35 58, 2015 Komazawa Journal of Geography Rivers and Hydrological-Environment of Musashino-Upland in Tokyo Metro. SUMIDA Kiyomi Keywords: Mus

橡

DOUSHISYA-sports_R12339(高解像度).pdf


北海道水産試験場研究報告

6-11 地震の深さの下限分布と地殻の熱構造―近畿地方中北部について―

Motivation and Purpose There is no definition about whether seatbelt anchorage should be fixed or not. We tested the same test conditions except for t

Microsoft PowerPoint _FPCJ_hirata?v3.pptx

39B: Dae-Yeong JANG Laboratory of Regional Society, Minami Kyushu University, Takanabe, Miyazaki , Japan Accepted : Janu

Corrections of the Results of Airborne Monitoring Surveys by MEXT and Ibaraki Prefecture


スライド 1

<30372D985F95B62D8E52967B8C4F8E7190E690B62E706466>

06’ÓŠ¹/ŒØŒì

) ,

Journal of Geography 116 (6) Configuration of Rapid Digital Mapping System Using Tablet PC and its Application to Obtaining Ground Truth

Title 外傷性脊髄損傷患者の泌尿器科学的研究第 3 報 : 上部尿路のレ線学的研究並びに腎機能について Author(s) 伊藤, 順勉 Citation 泌尿器科紀要 (1965), 11(4): Issue Date URL



Crustal Earthquakes in Kyushu Toshiki KAKUTA, Hiroki MIYAMACHI, Hiroshi KUBOTA and Akio TAKAGI Department of Earth Sciences, Faculty of Science, Kagos

栃木県関谷断層の活動履歴調査

[1] 2 キトラ古墳天文図に関する従来の研究とその問題点 mm 3 9 mm cm 40.3 cm 60.6 cm 40.5 cm [2] 9 mm [3,4,5] [5] 1998

地質調査研究報告/Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Japan

/ / M. km km. m 図 1 CMT Hi-net CMT F-net CMT 図 1 PGV K-NET KiK-net 2. 地震および地震動の概要 / M JMA. / M JMA. 図 1 CMT PGV

はじめに

*1 *2 *1 JIS A X TEM 950 TEM JIS Development and Research of the Equipment for Conversion to Harmless Substances and Recycle of Asbe


. km. km. km

_念3)医療2009_夏.indd

<31322D899C8CA982D982A95F985F95B65F2E696E6464>

*.E (..).R

国土技術政策総合研究所 研究資料

I 1) 2) 51 (1976) 6.9 ha 9 (1934) 2km 15, (1955) 6 (1620)

soturon.dvi

大学論集第42号本文.indb

Kyushu Communication Studies 第2号

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

untitled

2019 年1月3日熊本県熊本地方の地震の評価(平成31年2月12日公表)

宮本/宮本

先端社会研究 ★5★号/4.山崎

鹿大広報149号

<4D F736F F F696E74202D C82CC A836A B8CB982CC905B82B388CB91B690AB2E707074>

untitled

第1図 Fig. 1 熊本県中部地域の地震活動 2010 から 2016 年 4 月 14 日 M6.5 熊本地震発生時までの時間区間で M 1.0 の地震に対して ETAS モデルを適用した解析結果 実時間 パネル対の左側 と ETAS による変換時間 対 の右側 に関する理論累積曲線 赤線 と実

Mikio Yamamoto: Dynamical Measurement of the E-effect in Iron-Cobalt Alloys. The AE-effect (change in Young's modulus of elasticity with magnetization

Microsoft Word - j201drills27.doc

日本ロータリー史

1 Fig. 1 Extraction of motion,.,,, 4,,, 3., 1, 2. 2.,. CHLAC,. 2.1,. (256 ).,., CHLAC. CHLAC, HLAC. 2.3 (HLAC ) r,.,. HLAC. N. 2 HLAC Fig. 2


Transcription:

プレス ブリーフィング 熊本地震と日本の地震活動 The 2016 Kumamoto Earthquake and Japanese Seismic Activity 東京大学地震研究所地震予知研究センター平田直 2016/4/27 FPCJ プレスプレス ブリーフィング 1

益城町で震度 7 を記録した熊本地方の二つの地震 Two large earthquakes with seismic intensity 7 at Mashiki town in Kumamoto The April 14, 2016 earthquake with a magnitude (M) 6.5 The April 16, 2016 earthquake with an M 7.3 2

Evaluation of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake The 288 th earthquake committee (Special) 2016 April 15 An earthquake with a magnitude of 6.5 (preliminary) occurred at a depth of 10 km at 21:26 on April 14 in Japan Standard Time (Japan Local Time = UT + 9 hr). Seismic intensity of 7 in Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) scale was observed in Kumamoto Prefecture and damages are reported. As of the time when the report was issued, the seismic activity undergoes as mainshock-aftershock sequence. The maximum aftershock with a magnitude 6.4 (preliminary) occurred at 00:03 on 15 th with the maximum intensity of 6+ in JMA scale (as of 18:00 on April 15 th ). Aftershocks are active although decaying forming 20-km-long area with a NE-SW direction. 3

Evaluation of the 2016 April 16 th Kumamoto earthquake The 289 th committee (Special) An earthquake with a magnitude 7.3 (preliminary) occurred at a depth of 10 km at 01:25 on April 16 in JST. Seismic intensity of 6+ *in JMA scale was observed in Kumamoto Prefecture. An earthquake with a magnitude 6.5 (preliminary) occurred at a depth of 10 km at 21:26 on April 14 in JST. Seismic intensity of 7 was observed in Kumamoto Prefecture and damages are reported. Aftershock activity is prominent in a 30-km-long area and in neighboring areas of Aso district in Kumamoto prefecture and Oita prefecture. *) The intensity has been corrected to 7 4

Seismic Intensities: JMA scale vs MM scale The Japan Meteorological Agency seismic intensity scale is a seismic scale used in Japan and Taiwan to measure the intensity of earthquakes. It is measured in units of shindo ( 震度, seismic intensity, lit. "degree of shaking"). Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale is determined from effects on people, human structures, and the natural environment. is used in US, Korea 2016/4/27 FPCJ プレスプレス ブリーフィング 5

Seismic Intensity in JMA scale Seismic intensity describes the scale of the ground motion at a particular location. It varies with the distance from the epicenter and the surface geology at each point. JMA's seismic intensity scale has 10 degrees (0 (imperceptible), 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 lower, 5 upper, 6 lower, 6 upper, 7). http://www.jma.go.jp/jma/en/activities/inttab le.html 2016/4/27 FPCJ プレスプレス ブリーフィング 6 JMA

Each country has own scale!! JMA seismic intensity scale: Japan 1884-, 1996- date: seismic intensity meters 0 to 7, 10 scales (5 and 6 have two scales) Mercalli intensity scale: US, Korea 1902,Mercalli-Cancani-Sieberg intensity (MCS)scale 1931,Mercalli-Wood-Neuman intensity (MWN) scale Now Modified Mercalli intensity scale, MMI scale a scale from I (not felt) to XII (total destruction) Medvedev-Sponheuer-Kárník scale( MSK scale):cis East European countries, Israel, India 1964-, I to XII, 12 scales. China seismic intensity scale(csis):china 1980-, 1999: modified I-XII,12 scales, European macroseismic (EMS)scale: European countries 1988, European Seismological Commission (ESC) 1998, modified to EMS 98 I to XII, 12 scales 2016/4/27 FPCJ プレスプレス ブリーフィング 7

Intensities of the 2016 April 14 earthquake Epicenteral Distribution Intensities JMA 8

Intensity Distribution of the 2016 April 16 01:25 JMA 9

Maximum acceleration at surface Foreshock on April 14 Maximum velocity at surface Mainshock Maximum acceleration at surface Maximum velocity at surface 10

GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) 20-cm NNE displacement at Jonan station GSI 国土地理院 11

97-cm SW displacement at Choyo station GSI 国土地理院 12

Long. Lat. Depth length width strike dip rake slip Magnitude GSI 国土地理院 13

Coseismic Displacement on the source fault NIED 14

Surface displacement (Preliminary) Surface displacement is found along a 10- km-long western part of the Futagawa segment of the Futagawa fault system. The maximum displacement is about 2 m near Do-zon AIST 2016/4/27 FPCJ プレスプレス ブリーフィング 15

Location 1 (Tsuchiyama) Right-lateral 20-30 cm After the April 16 th 01:25 event Location 2(Iida) Vertical displacement of 15 cm 10-cm displacement perpendicular to the fault strace, indicating normal faulting Location 3(Do-zon) Right lateral of about 2 m AIST 16

Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion (HERP) 17

平成 28 年 (2016 年 ) 熊本地震の評価 この震源域付近には日奈久断層帯が存在している 今回の地震は その高野 - 白旗区間の活動によると考えられる 地震調査委員会は日奈久断層帯 ( 高野 - 白旗区間 ) について 活動時に M6.8 程度の地震が発生する可能性があり 30 年以内の地震発生確率は不明と評価していた なお 日奈久断層帯 ( 高野 - 白旗区間 ) を含む九州南部の区域では M6.8 以上の地震の発生確率は 7-18% と評価していた 18

平成 28 年 4 月 16 日熊本県熊本地方 の地震の評価 第 289 回 ( 臨時会 ) 平成 28 年 4 月 17 日 この震源域付近には布田川断層帯が存在している 現地調査の結果によると 布田川断層帯の布田川区間沿いなどで地表地震断層が見つかっている この地震は 主に布田川断層帯の布田川区間の活動によると考えられる 地震調査委員会は布田川断層帯 ( 布田川区間 ) について 活動時に M7.0 程度の地震が発生する可能性があり 30 年以内の地震発生確率はほぼ 0%~0.9%( やや高い ) と評価していた なお 布田川断層帯を含む九州中部の区域では M6.8 以上の地震の発生確率は 18-27% と評価していた 19

日奈久断層帯 評価区間高野 - 白旗区間断層長約 16 km N23 E 右横ずれ断層南東側隆起を伴う高角度断層面の幅 13 km 程度地震発生層の下限の深さ 13 km 程度平均変位速度 0.04-0.2m/ 千年程度 ( 上下 ) 一回のずれ量 2m 程度最新活動時期約 1,600 年前以後 約 1,200 年前以前平均活動間隔 : 不明 20

0%~0.9% chance of M7.0 in 30 years Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion (HERP) 21

Central Kyushu:18-20% Whole Kyushu: 30-42% Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion (HERP) 22

23 JMA

JMA 24

JMA 25

JMA 2016/4/27 FPCJ プレスプレス ブリーフィング 26

As of April 25 13:30 2016 Kumamoto EQ (M7.3) 200 2004 Niigata-ken Chuetsu EQ (M6.8) 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Inland EQ (M7.2) 100 1995 Kobe EQ (M7.3) 2005 West off Fukuoka EQ (M7.0) 2000 Western Tottori EQ (M7.3) 1997 Satsuma EQ (M6.8) JMA 27

Summary On April 14 th and 16 th, 2016, large shallow inland earthquakes occurred in Kumamoto, which generated strong grand motions. April 14the event is M6.5 and 16the is M7.3 Both generated seismic intensity 7 in JMA scale. Those occurred along Futagawa-Hinagu fault system. It was evaluated that a chance of M6.8 or larger in 30 years is 30-42% for a whole Kyushu The 2016 Kumamoto earthquake is associated with prominent foreshock and afterchok activites. 2016/4/27 FPCJ プレスプレス ブリーフィング 28