|
|
|
- よしたか よせ
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2
3 Economic Outlook 79
4 Pay-as-you-go Pay-as-you-go Pay-as-you-go Pay-as-you-go
5
6
7 Girouard and André (2005)van den Noord (2000) Giorno et al (1995) ()
8 The Budget and Economic Outlook Fiscal Years 2007 to 2016
9
10 The Budget and Economic Outlook : An Update 2006a
11 Flow of Funds
12 European commission (2006b) Statistical Annex of European Economy Autumn 2006
13 PUBLIC FINANCES IN EMU 2006
14
15 Economic Outlook 79 Database Economic Forecasts, Autumn 2006
16 Economic Outlook 79 Database Economic Forecasts, Autumn 2006
17
18 Economic Outlook database Economic Forecasts, Autumn 2006 Alesina and Ardagna (1998)Alesina and Perotti (1996))
19
20
21 Economic Outlook 79 Database Economic Outlook 79 Database
22 Casey et al (2003)90 )90 Alesina and Ardagna (1998) )
23 Economic Outlook 79
24
25 Hori et al (2002) Kydland and Prescott (1977) Girouard and Andr(2005)Van den Noord (2000)
26 Girouard and André
27 Girouard and André (2005) counter-cyclical pro-cyclical 1-1
28 33 )Annett (2006) Taylor (2000)
29 Economic Outlook No.79
30 Annett (2006))
31
32
33 Public finances in EMU EUROPEAN ECONOMY. No Gonzlez-Pramo (2006)
34 Taylor (2000)
35 Blinder and Reis (2005)
36 Economic Outlook 79 Economic Outlook 79
37
38 Institute for Fiscal Studies Devereux and SorensenInstitute for Fiscal Studies
39 Bassanini and Duval Bassanini and Duval (2006)
40
41
42
43 Girouard and André (2005) van den Noord (2000) Giorno et al (1995)
44
45
46 ESRI Discussion Paper No.103 Alesina, Alberto. and Silvia Ardagna. [1998] Tales of Fiscal Adjustments, Economic Policy No.27 Alesina, Alberto. and Roberto Perotti. [1996] Fiscal Adjustments in OECD Countries: Composition and Macroeconomic Effects, NBER Working Paper 5730 Annett, Anthony. [2006] Enforcement and the Stability and Growth Pact: How Fiscal Policy Did and Did not Change Under Europe s Fiscal Framework, IMF Working Paper 06/116 Bassanini, Andrea. and Romain Duval. [2006] Employment Patterns in OECD Countries: Reassessing the Role of Policies and Institutions, OECD Economic Department Working Papers No.486 Blinder, Alan S. and Ricardo Reis. [2005] Understanding the Greenspan Standard, CEPS Working Paper No. 114 Casey, Bernard, Howard Oxley, Edward Whitehouse, Pablo Antolin, Romain Duval and Willi Leibfritz [2003] Policies for an Ageing Society: Recent Measures and Areas for Further Reform, OECD Economic Department Working Papers No.369 CBO [2005] The Long-Term Budget Outlook, December 2005 CBO [2006a] The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2007 to 2016, January 2006 CBO [2006] The Budget and Economic Outlook An Update, August 2006 CBO [2006b] The Cyclically Adjusted and Standardized Budget Measures, March 2006
47 Devereux, Michael P.and Peter Birch Sørensen. [2005] The Corporate Income Tax: International Trends and Options for Fundamental Reform, EPRU Analysis No.24, Economic Policy Research Unit, Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen. European Commission [2005] European Economy No European Commission [2005] Public Finances in EMU 2005 European Commission [2006] Public Finances in EMU 2006 European Commission [2006] Statistical Annex of European Economy Autumn 2006 European Commission [2006a] The Impact of Ageing on Public Expenditure: Projections for the EU25 Member States on Pensions, Health Care, Long-term Care, Education and Employment ( ), European Economy Special Report No.1/2006 European Commission [2006b] Economic Forecasts Autumn 2006 Feldstein, Martin. [2002] The Role for Discretionary Fiscal Policy in a Low Interest Rate Environment, NBER Working Paper 9203 [2006] Flow of Funds September 2006 Giorno, Claude., Paul van den Noord., Pete Richardson. and Deborah Roseveare. [1995] Estimating Potential Output, Output Gaps and Structural Balances, OECD Economic Department Working Papers No.152 Girouard, Nathalie. and Christophe André. [2005] Measuring Cyclically-Adjusted Budget Balances for OECD Countries, Economic Department Working Papers, No.434, OECD González-Páramo., Jos Manuel. [2006] The Revised Stability and Growth Pact: Is It Working?, Speech at the Conference by the Center for Financial Studies and the European Central Bank H,M,Treasury [2006 Paublic Expenditure Statistical Analyses, May 2006 Hori, Masahiro., Chang-tai-Hsieh., Keiko Murata. and Satoshi Shimizutani. [2002] Did the Shopping Coupon Program Stimulate Consumption? Evidence from Japanese Micro Data, ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.12, Economic and Social Research Institute, Cabinet Office Kydland, Finn E. and Edward C. Prescott [1977] Rules Rather than Discretion: The Inconsistency of Optimal Plans, Journal of Political Economy, vol.85, no.3 OECD [2002] Economic Outlook No.72, December 2002 OECD [2005] Economic Surveys Japan, March 2005 OECD [2006a] Employment Outlook, September 2006 OECD [2006b] Economic Outlook No.79, January 2006 OECD [2006c] Revenue Statistics , October 2006 OECD [2006d] Economic Surveys Euro Area, forthcoming Taylor, John B. [2000] Reassessing Discretionary Fiscal Policy Van den Noord, Paul. [2000] The Size and Role of Automatic Stabilizers in the 1990s and Beyond, OECD Economic Department Working Papers No.230
ＧＤＰギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
untitled
Trade and Trade Finance in the 200809 Financial Crisis, IMF Working Paper WP/11/16., Understanding the Great Trade Collapse of 200809 and the Subsequent Trade Recovery, Economic Perspectives, 2Q/2011.
表紙＿目次.PDF
JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)
,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kakei/qa-1.ht
1, 1, 2011 4 3-28,,.,,.,.,,.,,.,,.,.,. 1., 1), 1946.,, GDP,.,,,.,,., (2008) ( NIRA ), 23,.,,, 2).,,,.,,.,,., 657-8501 2-1, E-mail: [email protected] 1) 1. 2), 1990 2 21, 1993 6 12. 3 1 1 2011
デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程
1991 2003 GDP....................................... http://www.stat.go.jp/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ GDP http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/ GDP - - - inflation targeting Krugman a IS-LM liquidity trap Krugman b Krugman
アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて
* ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East
少子化の動向と出生率に関する研究サーベイ
ESRI Research Note No.17 March 2011 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan ESRI Research Note ESRI 03-3581-0919 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 3 18 50 2005 6 1 7 12,482 8,734 70.0 50 2005
デフレの定義（最新版）.PDF
DP/01-1 Director General for Economic Assessment and Policy Analysis CABINET OFFICE E-mail : [email protected] 1 2 3 i (ii) 4 5 Deflation defined as at least two consecutive years of price decreases.
高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―
196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data
公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ
OECD CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI / GDP / / / /.............................. Transparency International Corruption Perception Index CPI CPI 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
野村資本市場研究所｜ベイルインの導入に向けた検討－破綻時に債権の損失吸収を図る新たな措置－（PDF）
1. SIFI 2. EU 1 FDIC G20 FSB 3. 4. FSB 2012 8 G20 88 2012 6 EU EU bail-in 1 ICB 2 write-down SIFI SIFI SIFI bail-out SIFI G20 too big to fail 2010 6 G20 SIFI 1 3 2011 11 FSBG20 1 2 3 2012 ICB PLAC 2011
Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003
266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2
1 1 1 [2000]
![1 1 1 [2000]](/thumbs/88/114894310.jpg "1 1 1 [2000]")
* 2000 7 26 1 1 1 [2000] 1 2 1 2 2 1 B to C 250000 億円 200000 日本米国 213,200 150000 100000 50000 0 153,600 106,900 71,100 66,620 42,700 43,860 22,500 26,940 15,340 645 3,360 7,730 1998 年 1999 年 2000 年 2001
e? e? h? h? h? h? h? h? e??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee?? e??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??ee??
財政赤字の経済分析：中長期的視点からの考察
1998 1999 1998 1999 10 10 1999 30 (1982, 1996) (1997) (1977) (1990) (1996) (1997) (1996) Ihori, Doi, and Kondo (1999) (1982) (1984) (1987) (1993) (1997) (1998) CAPM 1980 (time inconsistency) Persson, Persson
復活だぁっ！ 日本の不況と流動性トラップの逆襲
It s Baaack! Japan s Slump and the Return of the Liquidity Trap 1998 2001 8 29-9 9 Ver.1.0.1 1 2 2 5 2.1..................................... 5 2.2......................... 6 2.3.........................
2-栗原.TXT
NAOSITE: Nagasaki University's Ac Title カジノ税に関する一考察 Author(s) 栗原, 克文 Citation 經營と經濟, vol.89(1), pp.17-34; 2009 Issue Date 2009-06 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10069/23392 Right This document is downloaded
03.indd
81 opqropqropqropqropqropqropqropqropqropqropqropqr 第 Ⅲ 章 卒業論文作成ガイドライン opqropqropqropqropqropqropqropqropqropqropqropqr 1. 論文作成の各段階で注意すべきこと第一段階 :3 年次のゼミ履修 指導教授の決定 3 3 第二段階 : 登録 LOYOLA 2011 第三段階 : 留学する場合の注意事項
60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3
Summer 08 59 I はじめに quasi market II III IV V 1 II 教育サービスにおける 準市場 1 教育サービスにおける 準市場 の意義 Education Reform Act 1988 1980 Local Education Authorities LEA Le Grand 1991 Glennerster 1991 3 1 2 3 2 60 Vol. 44
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN
Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: FTA FTA ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN The European Union: EU
首都直下地震における地方財政への影響
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.241 首都直下地震における地方財政への影響 宮崎毅 August 2010 内閣府経済社会総合研究所 Economic and Social Research Institute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan ESRI ディスカッション ペーパー シリーズは 内閣府経済社会総合研究所の研究者および外部研究者によって行われた研究成果をとりまとめたものです
開発金融増刊号
4 6 Y = f (, E, Y E ( Y E = α ( E α we py α 0 β E ( ( E β ( E β 6 ( = ( α β ( E β 8 i Y i f i, E i, i 9 Y = α α ( α E α S E 0 ( β β E β E( β E β β6 ( we Y = = = α β E py E β ( β Y Y B Y A r / pr p Y
- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
M&A IMF IMF gold tranche - March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade IMF IMF IMF GATT OECD OECD BITs. - March. U I = I (r m, i, Z * r m i Z * (= Z / Z) I / r m > I / i < I / Z *
-February GDP GDP
-February GDP GDP - GDP. GDP GDP / GDP DI.. DI..,,. -February (2010=100) 115 110 105 100 95 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 800 350 750 700 300 650 600 250 550
, FAD FAD FED FAO FAO WFP 1999 NGO ) 1. FAD FAD 1999 Lee, FAD % national coping s
20 30 280 350 1995 Devereux, 1988: 270 282 Food Availability Decline: FAD Food Entitlement Decline: FED FAD FAD FED 2000, 2002 FAD FAD FAD FED FAD Lee, 2003 FED 1999 59 2000 2000, 2001 2002 FAD FAD FED
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J-17 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-17 1999 6 * JEL classification E52 E58
自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書
17 1 2 3 4 5 11 16 30,247 17 18 21,024 +2.0 6 12 13 WHO 100 14 7 15 2 5 8 16 9 10 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 II I 18 Durkheim(1897) Hamermesh&Soss(1974)Dixit&Pindyck(1994) Becker&Posner(2004) Rosenthal(1993)
, 3, 1999, 4,,
1, 1992 2005,,, 10 2,, 1992 1998 1,,, 1998 2002 2,, 3,,, 2002, 2002 3 1 2 1 , 3, 1999, 4,, 3 14 11 2 I, 10,, 1992 2005, 2,, 3, 4,, II,, 1992 1998 1,, 1998 2002 2 2002 3 II-1: 1 1993 1998 90,, 1995 6850,,
OSIPP41_p1_2.eps
2007 年 冬 号 No.41 1 2 3 4 Peace Culture Review of Economic Design Journal of Labor Economics Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics Japan and the World Economy Daily Yomiuri Working Paper Series, Center for
国際流動性に関する財政的側面について
IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: [email protected] / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]
untitled
2007 2 * (i) (ii) 2006 7 1999 2 2000 8 1 (2003) Oda and Ueda (2005) 2005 Kimura and Small(2006) Iwamura, Shiratsuka and Watanabe (2006) (2006) 3 (i) (ii) (iii) 2 2 3 4 2.1 (2003) (2005) 1) (i) (ii) (i)
行動経済学の金融教育への応用の重要性
* 2 2 2010 3 3 2011 4 Princeton University, FINRA Investor Education Foundation2007 5 4 6 ASIC2011a disengagement less-than-optimal choices 7 5 8 2011 9 2011 6 10 OECD2005 11 12 2010 7 13 20112010 14 Benartzi20102011
untitled
[ 研究ノート ] 4% 19 19 20 1997a 20 Mitchell, 2002: 123 208 1997b; 2008 2 1960 1980 Abdel-Fadil, 1975; Hansen, 1969; Radwan & Lee, 1986 Abdel-Fadil, 1980; 85 Assaad, 1997 2 Hopkins Hopkins & Westergaard, 1998:
<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>
2011 Vol.60 No.2 p.138 147 Performance of the Japanese long-term care benefit: An International comparison based on OECD health data Mie MORIKAWA[1] Takako TSUTSUI[2] [1]National Institute of Public Health,
IMES Discussion Paper Series 98-J
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discuss ssion Paper No. 98-J-1 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN IMES Discussion Paper Series 98-J-1 1998 1 E-mail: [email protected] 1. 1.1.
........,.,.,..,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., International Capital Market Litan et al a b c d M&A a a b E- e- Litan et al. : Table Levine World Bank Levine Greenwald et al. B R F R r R R r B R r B R r B R R Stiglitz
第2章 経済成長と所得分配: マレーシアの事例を中心に
2006 1970 1990 U 1 GDP GDP GDP 1970 1 1969 5 13 5 13 New Economic Policy: NEP NEP 2 NEP 1971 1990 National Development Policy: NDP 1991 2000 Vision Development Policy: VDP 2001 2010 NEP NEP 1990 1980 1
日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析
196 2017 * ** ** 1 2 3 JEL Classification Codes D14, D15, E21 Keywords * 28 Hyun- Hoon Lee Robert Owen Kwanho Shin ** 29 196 An Empirical Analysis of the Saving Behavior of Elderly Households in Japan
産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf
2003 11 10 IT IT JIP JCER ) 2003 CD-ROM http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/bun/bun170/170index. html 1 JIP Jorgenson, Mun, andstiroh (2002) GDP 2 3 1951 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981
Winter 2009 No Lower Earnings Limit
特集 : イギリスの社会保障 - ニューレイバーの 10 年 イギリスの公的 私的年金制度改革 丸谷浩介 I 1 50 1997 II 1. 2 15 Winter 2009 No. 169 8 3 4 1999 1989 8 2. 4 1 2 1 1992 6 16 Lower Earnings Limit1 65 60 1 2 16 2.40 16 2 1 5 1 2 3. 6 1970 State
4703ALL01
473201010 *** (1999) 16 2017 20023 2 1 2 1220 (1999a),(1999b) (1998), (2002) (2003)(1999)(2003) Conjoint Analysis Conjoint Analysis Willingness to PayStandard gamble Time trade-off Rating Scale Willingness
高齢化による影響と波及効果
1 1. 2000 65 7.2 1 2018 14.3 8 2026 1955 1963 20.8 2050 38.2 < 1-1> 65 65 : Korean Statistical Information System(KOSIS) database (0 14 )1960 42.3 2000 21.1 40 2020 12.42050 8.9 (15 64 ) 1960 54.8 2000
28 Vol. 43 No. 1 2 Burchardt, Le Grand & Piachaud 1999 Bradshaw et al Gordon et al.2000 Whelan et al.2002 poverty de
27 2002 1998 1999 EC2000 National Action Plans for Social Inclusion 1 1 2 3 4 16 18 1 2 2 1 28 Vol. 43 No. 1 2 Burchardt, Le Grand & Piachaud 1999 Bradshaw et al. 2000 Gordon et al.2000 Whelan et al.2002
5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin
5 I. 3 1 1990 2 The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthening North Pacific Cooperation organized by the East-West
Powered by TCPDF ( Title 金利現実化措置以後の韓国における企業金融 : 年 Sub Title Korean corporate finance between 1965 and 1971 Author 李, 明輝 (Lee,
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Title 金利現実化措置以後の韓国における企業金融 : 1965 1971 年 Sub Title Korean corporate finance between 1965 and 1971 Author 李, 明輝 (Lee, Myunghwi) Publisher 慶應義塾経済学会 Publication year 2016
看護・介護分野における外国人労働者の受け入れ問題
1111 12 16 1610 1723 1725 1725 1729 FTA EPA 16 2004 11 EPA 18 2006 FTA 17 2005 1 4 2006. POEA AOTS 2 EPA 3 care giver 4 FTA 2005.7.28. ; http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/thailand/j_thai_kyotei. html 20051215
社会学部紀要 １１７号☆／１．野瀬
October 2013 A 13 2 c 1 1979 A 13 2 b c 1 2012 9 160 2 33 2 OECD 1 2 35.3 OECD 34 29 70.0 50.426 64.7 OECD 30.0 2.2 OECD GDP 2 0.5 31 31 OECD 1.1 45 3 3 1 1 2 200 400 2 1 2 400 600 600 800 13 2 c 2013
安全・安心な社会を目指して―現代社会病理の背景に関する有識者ヒアリングとりまとめ－
1 http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/prj/social/social_main.html 2 3 4 5 I 1990 2 II 16 6 20 3,000 2,136 71.2 16 15 16 20 50 3001 55.9 65.8 64.0 55.6 51.4 50 60 3 4 30 50 40 40 30 30 5 79.4 86.1 67.8 44.6 48.8 41.1
宮本／宮本
SO EU Montana State University Japan Natural Legacies Keynote Speech Environmental Policies in Japan Past, Present, Future SO SO SO SO SO NO SO ppm BOD ppm ppm cm SO ppm ppm SOppm ppm H Weidner H.Weidner
Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step
Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Stepwise Chow Test a Stepwise Chow Test Takeuchi 1991Nomura
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): 54-76 Issue Date 1996-07 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/45083 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher
1970). Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C. and R. D. Willig (1982); Contestable Markets and The Theory of Industry Structure, 1982. Caves, R. and M. E. Porter (1977); From entry barriers to mobility barriers: