日本学術会議平成26年9月2日報告1
|
|
|
- ちかこ みやまる
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2
3
4 Bailly du Bois, Pascal Bocquet, Marc Boust, Dominique Brovchenko, Igor Choe, Anna Christoudias, Theo Didier, Damien Dietze, Heiner Garreau, Pierre Jung, Kyung Tae Le Sager, Philippe Lelieveld, Jos Maderich, Vladimir S. Park, Soon- Ung Quelo, Denis van Velthoven, Peter Winiarek, Victor Yoshida, Sachiko IRSN, France CEREA, France IRSN, France IMMSP, Ukraine SNU, Korea Cyprus Institute, Cyprus IRSN, France GEOMAR, German IFREMER, France KIOST, Korea KNMI, Netherland Max- Planck- Institute for Chemistry, Germany IMMSP, Ukraine SNU, Korea IRSN, France KNMI, Netherland CEREA, France WHOI, USA
5 1
6 ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ±
7
8 Ka imikai-o-kanaloa
9
10 2 3
11
12
13
14 σ
15
16
17
18
19
20 µ µ
21 µ
22
23
24
25
26 Ka imikai-o-kanaloa Ka imikai-o-kanaloa
27
28
29 σ
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47 CEREA Polyphemus km Eulerian CRIEPI CAMx km Eulerian IRSN ldx 10 km Eulerian JAEA GEARN km Lagrangian JAMSTEC WRF-Chem km Eulerian JMA-MRI NHM-LETKF-Chem km Eulerian JMA JMA-RATM km Lagrangian NIES CMAQ km Eulerian SNU ETM 27 km Eulerian
48 CEREA 3.35(17%) 68% 2.62(14%) 85% 5.97 (31%) 19.3 CRIEPI 2.37 (27%) 79% 0.90 (10%) 54% 3.27 (37%) 8.8 IRSN 3.14 (15%) 46% 5.52 (27%) 71% 8.66 (42%) 20.6 JAEA 3.79 (43%) 67% 1.22(14%) 65% 5.01 (57%) 8.8 JAMSTEC 1.95 (22%) 67% 1.45 (16%) 67% 3.40 (39%) 8.8 JMA 2.65(30%) 50% 1.18 (13%) 36% 3.83(44%) 8.8 MRI 3.31 (38%) 92% 1.72 (20%) 97% 5.03 (57%) 8.8 NIES 2.90(33%) 98% 1.06(12%) 96% 3.96 (45%) 8.8 SNU 1.29 (15%) 32% 1.76 (20%) 36% 3.05(35%) (27%) 67% 1.94(16%) 67% 4.69(43%) (10%) 20% 1.36(%) 22% 1.68(%) 4.6
49 r FB FMS FOEX %FA2 KSP Metric1 Metric2 Metric3 Metric4 CEREA CRIEPI IRSN JAEA JAMSTEC MRI JMA NIES SNU ensemble
50
51
52 Model name SPRINTARS MASINGAR mk-2 MASINGAR- 1 MPIC/ EMAC v1.92 TM5 MRI-PM/r Institute Kyushu University MRI, JMA MRI, JMA Cyprus Institute KNMI MRI, JMA Region Global Global Global Global Global Regional Source term Resolution (grids) JAEA (Terada et al. 2012)[133] T213 ( ) JAEA (Terada et al. 2012)[133], Stohl et al.(2012)[116] TL319 ( ) JAEA (Terada et al. 2012)[133], Stohl et al.(2012)[116] T106 ( ) JAEA (Chino et al. 2011)[19], Stohl et al.(2012)[116] T106 ( ), T255 ( ) JAEA (Terada et al. 2012)[133] 3 2 (120 90) JAEA (Terada et al. 2012)[133] 60km ( ) Layers 20 (~8hPa) 40 (~0.4hPa) 30 (~0.4hPa) 31 (~10hPa) (~10km) Eulerian or Lagrangian Euler Euler Euler Euler Euler Euler Dynamics Online (MIROC) Online (MRI-AGCM3) Online (MRI/JMA 98) Online (ECHAM5) Offline (ECMWF) Offline (WRFv3) Meteorologi cal Analysis NCEP reanalysis, nudging technique JCDAS (extended, near real time JRA-25), Newtonian nudging technique JCDAS (extended, near real time JRA-25), Newtonian nudging technique ECMWF ERA-Interim (for nudging dynamics only, precipitation is model generated) ECMWF Operational Data NCEP FNL analysis, grid nudging technique
53 Total Deposition [PBq] Total wet Deposition [PBq] Total dry Deposition [PBq] SPRINTARS Wet/Total ratio[%] SPRINTARS MASINGAR (JAEA) mk MASINGAR mk (Stohl) MASINGAR-1 (JAEA) MASINGAR-1 (Stohl) EMAC T255 (JAEA) EMAC T255 (Stohl) EMAC T106 (JAEA) EMAC T106 (Stohl) KNMI TM5 (JAEA) MRI-PM/r ensemble mean standard deviation :
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
平成13年度日本分析センター年報
200 150 70 234 Bq m 3 1 148 Bq m -3 100 0 550 0 11/1 0:00 am 11/2 0:00 am 11/3 0:00 am 25 20 15 10 11/1 0:00 am 11/2 0:00 am 11/3 0:00 am 39.2 Bq m -3 11/4 0:00 am 30 990 19.3 Bq m -3 60 15.8 Bq m -3 14.1
第197回幹事会資料5別添5その2
付 録 各 モデルの 詳 細 など 目 次 付 録 3A. 領 域 規 模 大 気 輸 送 モデル 相 互 比 較 に 参 加 した 各 モデルの 概 要 71 3A.1. Centre d'enseignement et de Recherche en Environnement Atmosphérique (CEREA) 71 3A.2. 電 力 中 央 研 究 所 (CRIEPI) 71 3A.3.
<8CA48B8694EF8E E E816991E C5816A5F8DC58F4994C52E706466>
3 4 5 7 8 9 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 21 23 25 27 28 29 30 1 KYUSHU UNIVERSITY KYUSHU UNIVERSITY 2 KYUSHU UNIVERSITY KYUSHU UNIVERSITY 2 3 4 KYUSHU UNIVERSITY KYUSHU UNIVERSITY 3 5 6 KYUSHU UNIVERSITY KYUSHU
2
TIGGE * 1 2 1 2 JAMSTEC 2 3 Strategy Global Ens. Forecast Potential Occurrence - Timing ~ O(day) - Location ~ O(100km) time Regional Hi- Res. Forecast - Estimate Quantitatively - Timing ~ O(hr) - Location
第１は、福島事故とチェルノブイリ事故との放射能放出量の比較です
2014 5 16 2013 9 1 2014 4 4 137 1 10 1 1 2 20 3.6 17 1 3 5 8 8 11 12 15 15 16 18 20 21 23 1-1 25 1-2 26 2 1 =E 15 27 2 2 E n E 15 28 3 29 4 30 5 32 6 33 2 1 1 2011 4 12 137 6.1E 15 1.2E 16 1-1 2012 9 8
JRA-25長期再解析実施計画
13 8 13 JRA-25 ... i... 1... 1... 3... 3... 4 5-1.... 5 5-2.... 6 5-3.... 8 5-4.... 12 5-5.... 12... 12... 13... 13... 15... 16... 17 i 1990 JRA-25 (Japanese Re-Analysis 25 years) JRA-25 1979 2004 26 13
2013SuikoMain.dvi
, 57 213 2 WATER RESOURCES PROJECTION AT THE PASAK RIVER BASIN IN THAILAND UNDER A CHANGING CLIMATE 1 2 3 4 5 Y. TACHIKAWA, Y. FUJITA, M. SHIIBA, K. YOROZU and S. KIM 1 ( ) ( 615-854 C1) 2 ( ) J-POWER
ｽﾗｲﾄﾞ ﾀｲﾄﾙなし
1 THORPEX 2005 7 4 5 THORPEX THORPEX High impact weather High impact weather NH500hPa (1) (m) ( ( NH500hPa (2) (m) ( ( 240 72 hour Position Error (JMA, UKMO, ECMWF, 3-Models Ensemble) 800 210 700 180 150
13
Pharmaceutical Segment 12 13 14 Pharmaceutical Segment 15 16 Pharmaceutical Segment 17 GERMANY CHINA JAPAN U.S.A. KOREA SINGAPORE 18 Pharmaceutical Segment 19 20 Pharmaceutical Segment 21 22 Pharmaceutical
背景 ヤマセと海洋の関係 図 1: 親潮の流れ ( 気象庁 HP より ) 図 2:02 年 7 月上旬の深さ 100m の水温図 ( )( 気象庁 HP より ) 黒潮続流域 親潮の貫入 ヤマセは混合域の影響を強く受ける現象 ヤマセの気温や鉛直構造に沿岸の海面水温 (SST) や親潮フロントの影響
大気再解析データで表現されるヤマセ - モデルによる SST の違いと解析された気温への影響 - 弘前大学大学院理工学専攻佐々木実紀 背景 ヤマセと海洋の関係 図 1: 親潮の流れ ( 気象庁 HP より ) 図 2:02 年 7 月上旬の深さ 100m の水温図 ( )( 気象庁 HP より ) 黒潮続流域 親潮の貫入 ヤマセは混合域の影響を強く受ける現象 ヤマセの気温や鉛直構造に沿岸の海面水温
2 7 ( ) µ untitled
48 B 17 4 Annuals of Disas. Prev. Res. Inst., Kyoto Univ., No. 48 B, 2005 (CO 2 ) (2003) Sim-CYCLE(Ito and Oikawa, 2000) CO 2 CO 2 Figure 1 CO 2 0 (Denning et al., 1995) CO 2 (2004) Sim-CYCLE CO 2 CO 2
untitled
2013/7/25 ICT 1 2011 2 3 4 1 11010% 樽 薩 HP 5 2011 2011 1 91421m 1959 1716 17300 2011/01/27 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC Daily News 6 2011/1/28 asahi.com 2011/1/28 asahi.com 8.0 km 2011/2/18 2011/2/7 7 2011/2/14
_計算科学が拓く世界.key
11 3 @takeshi_enomoto enomoto.takeshi.3n@kyoto-u.ac.jp 2017 12 13 5 bbc.com pakistantoday.com.pk 1 V. Bjerknes (1904) L. F. Richardson (1922)... 145 hpa/6h J. Charney, R. Fjørtoft and J. von Neuman
4., ( 6) 5. ( 7) 6., ( 8) 7., ( 9)... 2, ( ) 33,,,,,,, 3 (1km ),. 25 (213 ) 1 26 (214 ) , ( 7),,,,, ( 9) 1, 2, (, ),., [3] [4],,82., 3, 3
![4., ( 6) 5. ( 7) 6., ( 8) 7., ( 9)... 2, ( ) 33,,,,,,, 3 (1km ),. 25 (213 ) 1 26 (214 ) , ( 7),,,,, ( 9) 1, 2, (, ),., [3] [4],,82., 3, 3](/thumbs/91/106046526.jpg "4., ( 6) 5. ( 7) 6., ( 8) 7., ( 9)... 2, ( ) 33,,,,,,, 3 (1km ),. 25 (213 ) 1 26 (214 ) , ( 7),,,,, ( 9) 1, 2, (, ),., [3] [4],,82., 3, 3")
., ( 19 53 ) 33,,,,,,, 3 (1km ),. 25 (213 )1 26 (214 )6 6 18.,,82. 3, 3.,.,. 1 [1] [2].,. 27,,,,., 1 5 9 1/3 4 1/9., 1. ( 3) 2., ( 4) 3. ( 5) 66-81 TEL: 75-753-5515, E-mail: aki@i.kyoto-u.ac.jp 1 4., (
阪神５年PDF.PDF
1995.1.17 N 0km 10 20 31 4,569 14,679 67,421 55,145 6,965 80 1,471 3,383 13,687 5,538 327 22 933 1,112 12,757 5,675 465 2 243 3,782 6,344 6,641 65 17 555 1,755 9,533 8,109 940 15 12 817 271 3,140 1 918
1,000m 875m1 6km
1,000m 875m1 6km 1,000m 875m 30 13 14 11 2 14 23 27 50 30 3 () 23 24 25 16,534 16,792 18,017 13,946 17,884 18,712 30,480 34,676 36,729 1 (25 ) () 395 1,420 1,343 1,756 1,364 1,599 1,184 1,278 1,619 1,324
一太郎 13/12/11/10/9/8 文書
(1) 17 3 (2) (3) (1) 1 (2) 2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) 3 (1) 50 12.5km 1km (2) 16 1900 (3) 65 65 19 14 17.5 (4) 34 31 22 335 133 (5) 104 321 3 4 4 43 4 4 4 () 5 6 (1) (2) 7 8 (1) (2)24 24 (3) 9 (4)
私にとっての沖縄と独自性.PDF
6902117 2 1200km 48 11 46 36 40 (1) ( ) 3 1 1-1 1-2 2 (= ) 3 1. 14 14 ( ) ( 2001) ( ) ( ) 1390 1474 ( 2001) ( 4 ) ( ) 46 3000 ( ) = 5 1609 1602 ( 2001) 1-1 1-2 1-1 1-2 15 (2) 6 1314 ( ) (3) ( ) 1 ( 1993:48)
-1 - -2 - -3 - -4 - -5 - -6- -7 - 260-8 - -9 - - 10-104km2 194km 340 104km2 194km 340 -11 - - 12-10km 20km 30km 260 260 1km 2km 2000 10km 20km 30km 260 260 1km 2km 2000 260 260 1km 2km 2000 - 13 - ( 3
, , km 9.8km 10.5km 11.9km 14.4km 14.4km 34.1km 3.4km 31.7km 6.2km 7.3k
410 470 500 540 620 620 620 1,250 300 1,170 360 390 450 490 570 670 770 850 880 7.7km 9.8km 10.5km 11.9km 14.4km 14.4km 34.1km 3.4km 31.7km 6.2km 7.3km 8.9km 10.4km 12.9km 15.8km 19.0km 21.7km 22.4km 530
! 1 m 43 7 1 150 ( ) 100 ( ) 11.3m 30 800 ( ) 1680 20 15 1,253 ( ) 1,500 51 52 300 1 4 134 1000 3 600 ( ) 30 , 402 km (1702) ( 1 402 67 12 23 10 ( ) ( 25,000 ) (1701 ) 485 ( 20 ) 400 (1860 ) (1) (2)
untitled
60 547 547 4km [ ] 14 20 18 2,400 5,500 24 15 10,000 [ ] [ ] 1779 1779 1471-76 1914 1471-76 1779 1914 1779 1779 1914 1471-7676 1779 1471-76 1946 1914 59 8 25 30 1986 3km 2m 5 2km 18 6 [ ]
Microsoft Word - 01_表紙
1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 7.0 190 km 30 62 63 64
渋谷区耐震改修促進計画
1 2 3 2 1,000 ( ) 1,500 ( ) 3 1,000 1 1,000 2,000 3 1,000 2,000 3 1,000 2,000 3 1,000 2,000 3 1,000 2,000 3 1,000 2,000 3 1,000 3 1,000 2,000 3 1,000 2,000 3 1,000 3 1,000 2 1,000 2,000 2 1,000 2,000 2
QUARTERLY JOURNAL HYDROGRAPHY Establishing a JCG/UKHO cooperative framework on nautical charts -- Part. (p. ), Investigations on reproduced Ino-zu Maps, Japanese historical maps,owned by JHOD.(p. ), Various
19982004 7 1998 2004 7 1.2.1 1.2.2 1.2.1 7 1.2.2 1.1.3 1.2.2 1.2.3 7 2.1.1 1998 19982004 7 125 2000 8 3 34 46 1.3.3 1980 1900 7 1900 7 7 19981999 1998200020032004 2003 1.2.3 10 35 1998 2001 2000 1112 19982004
GLOBAL FALLOUT 1
GLOBAL FALLOUT 1 Country Indonesia India Pakistan Korea P.R.China Brazil Argentina Japan New Zealand Italy Switzerland Denmark Canada U.S.A. England Netherlands France W.Germany Sweden Meats 0 20 40 60
AAA 討議集
61 2014 Ver.20150329 Abbas KHAYYER, Hitoshi GOTOH and Naoki TSURUTA A New Surface Tension Model for Particle Methods with Enhanced Splash Computation Takaaki Abe (Civil Engineering Research Institute
第7回TB分科会／資料2-3「NICT保有データの利活用について」
data NW data DATA Sensor data DB data Testbed/Cloud App Tool Device VALUE Parallel Processing Pwrake To create pyramid tile image files Crawler (NICTY/DLA) Numerical files (HSF, netcdf) Graphic files
1 -, XX Total Fertility Rate 1 2
2005 3 No. REGION- 10 1 -, XX 10 2 3 4 Total Fertility Rate 1 http://www.kyoto-su.ac.jp/project/orc/econ-public/region/yamada/pdf/future-pop.xls 2 http://www.stat.go.jp/data/jinsui/2003np/zuhyou/05k3f-1.xls
2.2 (1967) (1997,2003) 2.2 ( ) 11
( ) 2.1 10 2.2 (1967) (1997,2003) 2.2 ( ) 11 12 ( ) 90150 (684) (887) (1099) (1361) (1605) (1707) (1854) 21(1946) 8 2.3 (1854) 13 (1997) (1854.12.23) (M8.4) (24 ) (M8.4) 70,000 3000 ( ) 7 2 3 3 (,1997)
,,,,,
2011 19071052 (28,530 ) 19071052 2011 3 11 2,,,,, 1 1.1 1.2 (1) (2) 1.3 2 2.1 2.2 (1) (2) 2.3 3 4 4.1 4.2 (1) (2) (3) (4) 5 5.1 5.2 6 2011 3 11 2 10 1 1.1 2011 23 3 11 2 46 130 24 38.1 142.9 9.0 6 6 3
第一編 総説
1 1 ( ) () () ( ) ( ) ( ) () () ( ) ()( ) 10 10 ( ) () ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ()()()( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () ( ) () ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () ( ) ( )
untitled
186 17 100160250 1 10.1 55 2 18.5 6.9 100 38 17 3.2 17 8.4 45 3.9 53 1.6 22 7.3 100 2.3 31 3.4 47 OR OR 3 1.20.76 63.4 2.16 4 38,937101,118 17 17 17 5 1,765 1,424 854 794 108 839 628 173 389 339 57 6 18613
untitled
1. 3 14 2. 1 12 9 7.1 3. 5 10 17 8 5500 4. 6 11 5. 1 12 101977 1 21 45.31982.9.4 79.71996 / 1997 89.21983 41.01902 6. 7 5 10 2004 30 16.8 37.5 3.3 2004 10.0 7.5 37.0 2004 8. 2 7 9. 6 11 46 37 25 55 10.
ohpmain.dvi
fujisawa@ism.ac.jp 1 Contents 1. 2. 3. 4. γ- 2 1. 3 10 5.6, 5.7, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8, 5.5, 5.3, 5.6, 5.4, 5.2. 5.5 5.6 +5.7 +5.4 +5.5 +5.8 +5.5 +5.3 +5.6 +5.4 +5.2 =5.5. 10 outlier 5 5.6, 5.7, 5.4, 5.5, 5.8,
D v D F v/d F v D F η v D (3.2) (a) F=0 (b) v=const. D F v Newtonian fluid σ ė σ = ηė (2.2) ė kl σ ij = D ijkl ė kl D ijkl (2.14) ė ij (3.3) µ η visco
post glacial rebound 3.1 Viscosity and Newtonian fluid f i = kx i σ ij e kl ideal fluid (1.9) irreversible process e ij u k strain rate tensor (3.1) v i u i / t e ij v F 23 D v D F v/d F v D F η v D (3.2)
GOSAT (JAXA) JAXA NASA, ESA JAXA 1
27 271119 (GOSATGOSAT-2 Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) JAXA Mitsubishi Electric Corporation 0 GOSAT (JAXA) 2005.8.1 JAXA NASA, ESA JAXA 1 2 2 GOSAT JAXA JAXA (NASA, ESA) JAXA GOSAT NIES 2
分布
(normal distribution) 30 2 Skewed graph 1 2 (variance) s 2 = 1/(n-1) (xi x) 2 x = mean, s = variance (variance) (standard deviation) SD = SQR (var) or 8 8 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 0 1 8 (probability
)2) 1) 2) JAPAN AUTO-OIL PROGRAM
3 211 11 2 1. 2. 1)2) 1) 2) JAPAN AUTO-OIL PROGRAM 1. IIASA 2. Japan Auto-Oil Program JATOP VOC 3. 2 1. IIASA 2. Japan Auto-Oil Program JATOP VOC 3. 3 CO 2 O 3 4 CO 2 NOx CO 2 NOx VOC VOC 3 CO 2 5 IIASA
ParkOptions&ACC_2001_Jap.ai
Park AFM www.parkafm.co.jp Park AFM 02 Park Systems Enabling Nanoscale Advances 04 06 08 10 11 12 14 15 16 18 19 03 Park AFM SmartScan TM 04 Park Systems Enabling Nanoscale Advances 05 Park AFM 06 Park
20121110 一緒に考えましょう講座 原発被災地 飯舘村のい ま 地域の視点から 北海道大学スラブ研究センター 家田修 ( ( 福島県相馬郡飯舘村 3045km 6200 1800 2011 3 11 3 15 4 22 20km 3 12 321 20-100μSv 330IAEA 331IAEA 環境省放射線調査結果 814 (2012/05/23-21:23 (2011330
1 1 3 i) ii) iii) *1 Very Short-Range Forecasting of Precipitation VSRF Radar-AMeDAS Precipitation RAP MSM MesoScale Spectral Model 200 2,000
1 1 3 i ii iii 1.1 1.1 *1 Very Short-Range Forecasting of Precipitation VSRF Radar-AMeDAS Precipitation RAP MSM MesoScale Spectral Model 2 2, km 1 km 2 2 km 1.1 VSRF MSM RSM 2.5km 1km 2km.5hr, 3 6hr 3AM/PM
GNSS satellite or Quasar 10m [5] (n 1) 10 6 = K 1 ( P d T ) + K 2( P v T ) + K 3( P v T 2 ) (2) O 1 S G Earth Atmosphere [4] (ray bending) 1 S
![GNSS satellite or Quasar 10m [5] (n 1) 10 6 = K 1 ( P d T ) + K 2( P v T ) + K 3( P v T 2 ) (2) O 1 S G Earth Atmosphere [4] (ray bending) 1 S](/thumbs/91/107348601.jpg "GNSS satellite or Quasar 10m [5] (n 1) 10 6 = K 1 ( P d T ) + K 2( P v T ) + K 3( P v T 2 ) (2) O 1 S G Earth Atmosphere [4] (ray bending) 1 S")
- - ( ) A Software Package Development for Estimating Atmospheric Path Delay based on JMA Numerical Weather Prediction Model Ryuichi ICHIKAWA (KASHIMA SPACE RESEARCH CENTER, NICT) Key words: GNSS, VLBI,
Mｏｔｔ散乱によるParity対称性の破れを検証
Mott Parity P2 Mott target Mott Parity Parity Γ = 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 t P P ),,, ( 3 2 1 0 1 γ γ γ γ γ γ ν ν µ µ = = Γ 1 : : : Γ P P P P x x P ν ν µ µ vector axial vector ν ν µ µ γ γ Γ ν γ
(EDITORIA)
(EDITORIA) IPCC AR4 195123 (likely) very likely IPCC AR4 Palmer likely Obs. CC : 2RMSE CC RMES 1 CC RMES CC RMES 1 Obs. GCM [mm/day] [mm/day] (1981-2) y = 4.2352ln(x) 14.25 OBS 5 y = 3.8575ln(x) 17.227
untitled
, Kaoru ARIYAMA 10 17N, Na, Mg,Al,Si,P,S,Cl,K,Ca,Fe,Cu,Zn,Se,Br,Rb Sr 14r2 0.9617 Tricholoma matsutake,,, JAS ICP-OESICP-MS 2ICP-OES ICP-MS,, Tricholoma matsutake -24- 1 7 2006 70 13 8 5 2,, 2007,, 10
200708_LesHouches_02.ppt
Numerical Methods for Geodynamo Simulation Akira Kageyama Earth Simulator Center, JAMSTEC, Japan Part 2 Geodynamo Simulations in a Sphere or a Spherical Shell Outline 1. Various numerical methods used
26 No.62 Contents 1 2 3 4 2 No.62
Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis INFORMATION 26 No.62 Institute for Traffic Accident Research and Data Analysis 26 No.62 Contents 1 2 3 4 2 No.62 ITARDA INFORMATION Section 1 9
: u i = (2) x i Smagorinsky τ ij τ [3] ij u i u j u i u j = 2ν SGS S ij, (3) ν SGS = (C s ) 2 S (4) x i a u i ρ p P T u ν τ ij S c ν SGS S csgs
![: u i = (2) x i Smagorinsky τ ij τ [3] ij u i u j u i u j = 2ν SGS S ij, (3) ν SGS = (C s ) 2 S (4) x i a u i ρ p P T u ν τ ij S c ν SGS S csgs](/thumbs/91/106610562.jpg ": u i = (2) x i Smagorinsky τ ij τ [3] ij u i u j u i u j = 2ν SGS S ij, (3) ν SGS = (C s ) 2 S (4) x i a u i ρ p P T u ν τ ij S c ν SGS S csgs")
15 C11-4 Numerical analysis of flame propagation in a combustor of an aircraft gas turbine, 4-6-1 E-mail: tominaga@icebeer.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp, 2-11-16 E-mail: ntani@iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp, 4-6-1 E-mail: itoh@icebeer.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp,
EQUIVALENT TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE FOR ISLANDING DETECTION METHODS OF SYNCHRONOUS GENERATOR -REACTIVE POWER PERTURBATION METHODS USING AVR OR SVC- Ju
EQUIVALENT TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE FOR ISLANDING DETECTION METHODS OF SYNCHRONOUS GENERATOR -REACTIVE POWER PERTURBATION METHODS USING AVR OR SVC- Jun Motohashi, Member, Takashi Ichinose, Member (Tokyo
Asia International Grid Connection SG - Interim Report
Asia International Grid Connection SG - Interim Report The State of the Interconnectors in Europe Since 1910s 1915 Denmark-Sweden Interconnection 1920 Interconnection between France, Switzerland and Italia.
(1) 2
- - 1 2 34 5 1192-0397 1-1 E-mail:oda-yoshiya@c.metro-u.ac.jp 2270-1194 1646 E-mail:y-aoyagi@criepi.denken.or.jp 2270-1194 1646 E-mail: higashi@criepi.denken.or.jp 4270-1194 1646 E-mail: shintaro@criepi.denken.or.jp
気象庁委託調査
ART - 103 1. (2-1) 2-1 : 61 20km 1 2 6 10km 6 12 7 1 100km 1 1 34 7 300km 7 3 3 1300km 1 *1 *1 6 3 *2 300km 6 *3 *1 15 3 GPV 15 *2 15 *3 16 *2 1 7 1 15 2. (1 ) 15 1 15 ( GPV=Grid Point Value) 104 1 / 2-1
muramatsu_ver1.key
229-ThTES α = e 2 /2ε 0 hc (John D. Barrow 2005) Radiationdominated era Matterdominated era Dark energy era 10 3 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 9 10 10 Time (years) Time 2 α = e 2 /2ε 0 hc (John D. Barrow
untitled
5 29 ( ) 5 30 ( ) 9 Max 107 10 21 5 30 ( ) 5 31 ( ) 6 1 ( ) 13 48 IC JCT 11 35 29 1 (1593) ( ) 7 1611 5 7 40 (1965) 40 2m 2 400 ( ) (1968 )8 22 20 ( ) 1796 16.5 () 3 2 4 ( ) ( ) 400 35 5 5 30 JTB 20 10
Title CMIP5マルチモデルにおける温暖化時の冬季の強い低気圧の増加 Author(s) 水田, 亮 Citation 週間及び1か月予報における顕著現象の予測可能性 (2013): Issue Date URL
Title CMIP5マルチモデルにおける温暖化時の冬季の強い低気圧の増加 Author(s) 水田, 亮 Citation 週間及び1か月予報における顕著現象の予測可能性 (2013): 240-245 Issue Date 2013-03 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/173471 Right Type Article Textversion publisher
untitled
1 5 26 10:0011:30 A JAMSTEC A101 A102 A103 A104 A105 A106 JAMSTEC 1 5 26 10:0011:30 B B101 B102 B103 B104 B105 B106 B107 JAMSTEC/RIGC JAMSTEC/RIGC JAMSTEC/RIGC 2011/2012 JAMSTEC 2010 1 5 26 10:0011:30
