運輸交通機関用太陽水素メタノールエネルギーシステム
|
|
- れんま みねむら
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Drift Prevention of Disabled Ships in Rough Seas by Shoichi HARA, Katsuji TANIZAWA, Kenji YAMAKAWA, Kunihiro HOSHINO, Kazuhiro YUKAWA, Jun HASEGAWA, Michio UENO, Makiko MINAMI, Nobuo KIRIYA Shigeo OHMATSU, Toshihiko SARUTA and Michio OKAMOTO Abstract The disabled tanker was broken into two parts due to rough waves and bow part of the ship drifted to the sea shore in the heavy oil leakage accident of Russian ship named Nakhodka January in The loaded heavy oil flew out of the bow section of the ship continuously and caused the biggest marine pollution in Japan. Approximately 6,5 kl heavy oil leaked out in this accident. If the technology for the recovery of the drifting bow part of disabled ship in rough waves had been available, the serious disaster would be prevented from occurring. This report is based on the research results of 5 year research project sponsored by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport from 1998 to 3. The direct motivation of starting the project is Nakhodka incident. The purpose of this project is to predict the drift motion of disabled ships in rough sea and to tow them safely in order to prevent the secondary disaster such as collision, explosion and strand. The Optimum Towing Support System (OTSS), which can estimate the drift motion, towline tension, maneuvering method during tow and towing power of tow boats, has been developed to provide with the Japan Coast Guard and salvage companies. Further, the computer program for predicting the drift course considering wave effect has been also developed to be provided with the Japan Coast Guard. 1
2 LNG ( ) 4 (1) () (3) (4) (1) () (3) (4)
3 () 1)) 1)) 3) () (-1) Fig Fig OE-XEYE O-XY = + + = + + = + + ), ( ),, ( ), ( ), ( ),, ( ), ( ), ( ),, ( ), ( Ar Ar A W W W Ar Ar A W W W Ar Ar A W W W U N T H N U N U Y T H Y U Y U X T H X U X θ χ β θ χ β θ χ β (1) X,Y,N,W A U β H, W TW χ UAr θar UC ψc UA ψa UAr θar C Ar A U U U U + = () 3
4 X E O E V : Drift speed ψ V ψ B U A ψ A ψ W ψ C U C V : Drift direction : Bow direction : True wind speed : True wind direction : Wave direction U C : Current speed : Current direction ψ B ψ W U A U Ar U Drift U Ar : Relative wind speed : Relative wind direction θ Ar U : Ship speed relative to water ψ U ψ A - β ψ V Wave χ Wind θ Ar ψ U ψ C Rel. Wind Rel. Drift Current : Direction of U χ : Relative wave direction Y E β : Oblique angle relative to water ψb Fig Coordinate system. ψ B = ψ U + β (3) Table Principal dimensions of a training ship. Fig Hydrodynamic forces and moment acting on underwater ship s hull due to oblique motion obtained by tank test for a training ship. ψw χ χ = ψ W ψ B (4) V, ψv V + = U U C (5) (-) (1) V ψv Table X,Y,N ψv ψb 1) Fig /ρLdU 1/ρL du (λ/l).8 XW,YW,NW 1) Fig /ρgL(Hw/) 1/ρgL (Hw/) 3 XA,YA,NA 4) Fig /ρAUAr L 1/ρAUAr L 3 ρa Fig Fig Fig (1) ψb Newton -Raphson V
5 X W' YW' NW' (deg) (deg) (deg) Fig Steady wave forces and moment calculated with 3-D. panel method for a training ship (?/L=.8)?/L=.8( T 7.34s) m? W= UA=15m/s? A=33 UC=.514m/s (1.kt)? C=1 (1) Fig Fig Fig Table Fig )) Table.1.1- Fig (1) 1) ß X A' YA' NA' Ar 7 (deg) Ar 7 (deg) Ar 7 (deg) 36 Fig Wind forces and moment obtained by wind tunnel test for a training ship. Table.1.1- Solutions for steady drifting conditions of a training ship in wind, wave and current. No. V( kt ) V (deg) B (deg)(deg) U Ar (m/s) Ar (deg)(deg) ) Fig Drifting velocity, direction and posture of a training ship in wind, wave and current. 5
6 Table Principal dimensions of a tanker model. (3) 6)7) T537 T54 V ψv β Table Experimental conditions. (3-1) Table N(3.kgf) ψb (Pitch ang.) 55% (Roll ang.) (Yaw r.) Fig Fig Fig Fig Fig Fig ψv ψv-18 Fig Fig χi 7 Fig χi Table T537 T539 (λ/l).4 T543 T544.4m A 8) T538 T54.3 T54 B A B Fig Fig ψb V ψv β (3-) Fig Fig Fig T538 T54T544 ψb ψv β Fig A B 6
7 Fig Trajectories of drifting motion of a tanker model. Fig Time history of T537. Fig Time history of T54. Fig Averaged values in steady drifting conditions of a tanker model. Fig ( A) Fig ( B) (Pitch ang.) (Roll ang.) (Yaw r.) Fig
8 (4) (4-1) 1999 Table Photo A Table Photo A 3 Photo A A1 7 :17 SOS 8 1:4 A A3 A4 A4 A7 E1 E4 EPIRB(Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon) B 1 Photo Disabled ship in drifting condition, wind from starboard side. UC ψc Photo ψc UC=1.65ktψC= : 11m/s 9: 11m/s 8 A1 A A V ψv Table Fig A Table Principal dimensions of a disabled ship. (4-) (4--1) deg 36deg deg Table m Table A Table
9 Fig Trajectory of a drifting ship;a1-a4 (A4-A7; towed path),epirb; E1-E4, B; life buoy and current data. Table Averaged drifting characteristics from point-a1 to point-a in Fig Fig Fig Fig deg deg Table Solutions for steady drifting conditions of a disabled ship in wind and current. Fig Hydrodynamic forces and moment acting on underwater ship s hull due to oblique motion obtained by tank test for a tanker model. Fig Table A ψb -5.5deg Fig Fig Fig Photo (4--) (1) Table
10 (5) Fig Wind forces and moment obtained by wind tunnel test for a bulk carrier model. Fig Comparison of drifting condition, observed and estimated for a disabled ship in wind and current. Fig ) Ueno, M., Nimura, T. On steady drifting motion of a ship in waves, Fig Proceedings of 5th IFAC conference on manoeuvring and control of marine craft, (), pp ) 74 1
11 () pp ) HAZMAT ()pp ) Risk Analysis 189 (1)pp ) 16 (1986)pp ) 1 (1)pp ) 13 () pp ) () 17 Suppl. 1(1997)pp =6m =.5m =.5m) (1) OCIMF 1) HAZMAT ) OCIMF Wind-Wave Drift Factor OCIMF Formal 3 3) (-1) ( Fig Table.1.-1 Principal dimensions. 11
12 3..5 Exp. F D =71.7V. Carriage Rail F D (N) Heaving rod Gimbal mm Load cell V(m/s) Fig Drug on the D body as a function of speed. 4 mm T V.88sec1.sec1.3sec1.57sec Fig..1.- Measuring equipment of D floating body motions. kb / T V λ V Table.1.-1 k V HW =.65H V Fig..1.- HW / λ V Fig V(m/s) 5.m FD(N) 1.m 8.m CD=1.449 (-).4 kb / ~.k W.cm~7.cm kb /.5.7. kw / λ.1~.64 Fig ISSC ( V / Bg ) Modified B = 4mm Pierson-Moskowitz ISSC a H T V V Tvω T ω v Φζζ ( ω) = HvTv exp.44 π π π.419:tv=1.57sec 1.51: Tv=.88sec Fig (1) Fig
13 Drifting speed (V/ Bg) k Exp. a=1.499 Drifting speed (V/ Bg) k Exp. a= H W / H W / Drifting speed (V/ Bg) k Exp. a=1.434 Drifting speed (V/ Bg) k Exp. a= H W / H W / Drifting speed (V/ Bg) k Exp. a= H W / Fig Relation between wave slope and drifting speed (D body in regular waves). Fig Relation between wave slope and drifting speed (D body in irregular waves). (3) (3-1) ( =5m =8.m =4.5m) Fig GPS Fig Fig mm 7g Heave.7secRoll.6sec.7 13
14 1 34 mm 54 mm mm Wave height : Hw (m) Regular wave Irregular wave H w / λ = 1 / 1 15 mm 34 mm 33 mm Wave length λ : (m) Weight = 6.35 kg Natural heave period =.7 sec Natural roll period =.6 sec Fig Spherical buoy used for the measurement. Fig Waves used for the drifting ( V speed measurement of the buoy λ, H are used on irregular waves). W Fig (3-) V 7.6m Fig Fig m ( V / Dg ) D = 34mm a 5m Stokes Fig λ =.5m ~1.5m Stokes.5m 1m Fig H W λ 1/1 Fig λ =.m ~1m ISSC λ = 5.m Stokes T.8sec ( 1m ) V 1.13sec ( m )1.39sec ( 3m ) HW =.65H V 14
15 Drifting speed (V/ Dg) Drifting speed (V/ Dg) kd/=1.91, λ =.5 m Exp. Stokes Drift Hw / λ kd/=1.364, λ =.7 m Exp. Stokes Drift a =.858 a = Drifting speed (V/ Dg) Drifting speed (V/ Dg) kd/=1.59, λ =.6 m Exp. Stokes Drift kd/=1.194, λ =.8 m Exp. Stokes Drift a = Hw / λ a = Hw / λ Hw / λ.3.3 Drifting speed (V/ Dg) kd/=.955, λ = 1. m Exp. Stokes Drift a = Drifting speed (V/ Dg) kd/=.637, λ = 1.5 m Exp. Stokes Drift a = Hw / λ Hw / λ Fig Relation between wave slope and drifting speed (Buoy in regular waves : λ=.5m1.5m) 1/1 (.83) Fig Fig (4) Fig..1.-8Fig
16 . Drifting speed (V/ Dg) Drifting speed (V/ Dg) kd/=.478, λ =. m Exp. Stokes Drift kd/=.191, λ = 5. m Exp. Stokes Drift a = Hw / λ a = Drifting speed (V/ Dg) Drifting speed (V/ Dg) kd/=.318, λ = 3. m Exp. Stokes Drift kd/=.96, λ = 1. m Exp. Stokes Drift a = Hw / λ a = Hw / λ Hw / λ Fig Relation between wave slope and drifting speed (Buoy in regular waves : λ=.m1m).3.3 Drifting speed (V/ Dg) k v D/=.955, λ v = 1. m Exp. a = Drifting speed (V/ Dg) k v D/=.478, λ v =. m Exp. a = H W / λ V H W / λ V.3 Drifting speed (V/ Dg) k v D/=.318, λ v = 3. m Exp. a = H W / λ V Fig Relation between wave slope and drifting speed (Buoy in irregular waves) 16
17 . F W F D 1 F Fig = ρgd C H ω () W R W 8 Fig FD = ρac V (3) D A C D D R B D C W 1.5 C W 1. V D R g 1 λ C H W ω = (4) AC D λ Coefficient a k Exp. (Regular wave) Exp. (Irregular wave) Cal. (5) C D = k Fig Linear coefficient of wave drifting speed of the D body. (5) (5-1) C C W (4) (4) ( δ = H / λ ) W a 1 λ C AC w = (5) D Fig Fig aδ a Coefficient a Exp. (Regular wave) Exp. (Irregular wave) Cal. (5) k D / Fig Linear coefficient of wave drifting speed of the body. D 17
18 C W C D Fig ) 5 C D =.9 5) Fig k Fig a Fig nd order coefficient of wave drifting speed of the buoy..3 (5-) Stokes.15 U δ c = U kz = cπ δ e (6) g 1 1+ π δ + π k 4 δ 4 6) c Stokes U R R (7) kz U π δ e = (8) D g kd V (5-3) V = bδ (9) D g R Drifting speed (V/ Dg) Coefficient b kd/ Exp. (Regular wave) Cal. Exp. (Regular wave) Cal. (1) H W / Fig Wave drifting speed of the buoy. b = A π kz (1) kd R A e ds V D R g = aδ + bδ (11) b Fig (11) Fig Fig aδ + bδ b (1) 18
19 Fig Wave flume with a bottom step. kd /.5~1. (5-4) H W k Fig. V Fig H W k V (6-1) Fig x = (6) h - h x = - x = 9) 5) ζaζrζt 7) E 1 E = ρgζ (1) Newman 8) ζ h Yaw Serise 6 V 19
20 V = V n (13) V c C ω = (14) k 1 kh n = ( 1+ ) (15) sinh kh Vc ω k n AB ( E E ) V E V (16) A R = EA ERET V+ x = ± (1)~(15) (16) n k T n ( ζ ζ ) = ζ A (17) R k T φ φ / t φ t φ φ t φ = φ = () t φ φ t ln r c ( Q) φ φ t ( Q) ( Q) φ ( P ) φ ( P) ln r r S ln t n, ( P, Q) ( P) φ n φ t n ( P Q) ( P) ds (3) F D F D = n gζ (18) ρ (17)(18) n D R = 1 ζ pgζ A A F n ζ R 1 + ζ A ζ n R (19) k k ζ T ζ A () PQ n r(p,q) PQ c(q)q S w φ ζ cosh k( z + h) n t n = = k A ω cosh kh φ ζ coshk( z + h) cos( kx ω t (4) k A sin( kx ω t ) coshkh (5) ) n k 1 k n n ζ T ζ A (6-) 1),11),1),13),14) (1) S f S w S b z o-xz g ρ λ k,ω,ζa Dφ 1 = z + Dt S s Dx x Dt ( ) v( x)( φ φe φ ) ( x)( η η ) e (6) = φ v (7) η v(x)
21 x x M αω λ N = ( n, n r) v( x) = for x x x1 = x + βλ φ t 1 = NM for x < x or x > x φt Nds 1 n ss (8) NM z ( φ ) Nds+ Fg ss 1 + q ( φ ) n (33) α β F g α~1β 1 q % φ e η e φ φ e η η e φ e =, ηe = ( h + z) ζ A cosh k φe = sin( kx ω t) (9) ω cosh kh e A ( kx ωt) η = ζ cos (3) φ φ = n ( υ + ω r) (31) n υ ω φ t φ t = k n n + n ( φ υ ω r ) + n n (& υ + ω& r ) + n ω ( ω ( φ υ ω r ) 1 ( φ ) k n ω r ) (3) & υ &, ω 7) υ& ω& φ t υ& ω& (3) q = k n ( φ υ ω r + n ω ω r + n ω φ υ ω r φ = z v x t dz φ = v x dt z ) ( ) ( ) (36) (34) φ φ t φ φ t 4 (MEL) (6-3) (6)(7) ( e )( φ φe ) ( e )( η ηe ) (35) φ t (3) (33) n φt = n (& υ + ω& r) (37) n φt 1 = NM { ( φt z) Nds Fg } + s s (38) 1
22 Table.1.- Principal dimensions of floating body. (6-4) ( =6m =.5m =.5m) 1mm cm.5m.3m 95% 6 15) Fig Floating body and measuring equipment. Table.1.- Fig (6-5) Fig (a)
23 k - B/ B/=.m k - B/> (x = m) k - B/< (6) Fig x = ± 1 (6) Fig (b)(9) 3. 1m (x = -1m) 3. 1m (x = 1m) x = m x = m Fig (a,b,c) Fig Floating body motions, wave reflection and transmission coefficients and wave drifting force at x = m. 3
24 Fig (d,e) Fig (f) Fig (9) Fig. Fig Fig Fig..1.- x = 1m x = -1m Fig (b).1.-18,19, Fig Floating body motions, wave reflection and transmission coefficients and wave drifting force at x = -1m. 4
25 Fig k- B/ <.6 x > 4.77 rad/sec 1 λ + / rad/sec Fig..1.- k - B/ kx λ - x λ Fig..1.- Floating body motions, wave reflection and transmission coefficients and wave drifting force at x = 1m. 5
26 (7) () (4) HW kv Fig Wave drift force as a function of relative location of the body to the floor step. Fig..1.- Wave drift force as a function of wave number and relative location of the body to the floor step. 6
27 Stokes Stokes 1) OCIMFDisabled Tankers, Report of studies on ship drift and towage, Oil Companies International Marine Forum, ISBN , (1981) ) HAZMATShip drift analysis for the Stokes Northwest Olympic Peninsula and the Stokes Strait of Juan de Fuca, Hazardous Materials Response and Assessment 6) Division, Office of Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment, NOAA}, HAZMAT Report 97-3, (1997) 3) 19,(1),pp ) (5) (1997) 5) ( ) 141,(1977), pp71-77,144,(1978), 3 15),16),17),18) pp ) Kinsman,B.Wind Waves, Dover Books on Earth and Science, (1965),pp ) Maruo, H.The drift of a body floating on waves, J.S.R., Vol.4, No.3, (196), pp.1 8) Newman, J.N. The drift force and moment on ships in waves, J.S.R., Vol.11, No.1, (1967), pp ) 51 (1975), pp ) Cointe, R., Geyer, P., King, B., Molin, B. and Tramoni, M. Nonlinear and linear motions of a rectangular barge in perfect fluid, Proc. of the 18th Symp. on x> Naval Hydro., AnnArbor, Michigan, k - B/.6 (199), pp ) Tanizawa, K.A Nonlinear Simulation (19),(),(1) Method of 3-D Body Motions in Waves, 178 (1995) pp ) Kashiwagi, M. Full-nonlinear simulation of hydrodynamic forces on a 7
28 Heaving two-dimensional body, 18 (1996)pp ) Tanizawa, K.Long time fully nonlinear simulation of floating body motions with artificial damping zone, 18 (1996), pp ) Tanizawa, K. and Clement, A : The report of NWT workshop, Proc. 1th ISOPE Conf., vol.3, Seattle, (), pp ) U S. Estimation of wave drift force by numerical wave tank, Proc. 9th ISOPE Conf., vol.3, Brest, (1999),pp ) Tanizawa, K., Minami, M. and Naito, S. Estimation of wave drift force by numerical wave tank, nd Report, Proc. B F L F Y Fig Coordinate system vol.48 (1976)pp ) 7 (1998),pp ) Tanizawa, K., Minami, M. and Naito, 1th ISOPE Conf., vol.3, Seattle, (), pp ) 187 (), pp (1) X Y N X Y N X' =, Y' = N' = (1) ρldu ρldu ρl du U C D ) U ) L N () Fig Shape Shape C D Table Drag coefficients of various shapes of -dimensional bodies Table.1.3- Drag coefficients of various shapes of 3-dimensional bodies F F X F D 8
29 1.3-1 F Fig.. C = D D 1 ρldu,c L = F L 1 ρldu FD FL (-1) () C N = 1 N ρl du = N ' () U Fig The change of viscous drag of the -D rectangle cylinder with different B shape of the tip by L/B. L Fig Drag coefficient of the -D rectangle object. Fig Lift coefficient of the -D rectangle object. Fig Longitudinal drag coefficient of the -D rectangle object. Fig Moment coefficient of the -D rectangle object. Fig Lateral drag coefficient of the -D rectangle object. 9
30 -1-1 Table Table Table L/B Fig..1.3-L/B Fig Effect of the rounding corner on the drag coefficient. 3) L/B.6 Fig Table ) Fig CD CL CN Fig Effect of the rounding corner 4) on the drag coefficient of -dimensional L/B /. / Fig CLCD X Y N Fig X Y Fig N CN -1-3 rectangle object. Fig Drag coefficient of -D elliptic cylinder. 3
31 Fig Fig Fig Fig KRR/BR:B B/D Fig K3D.5 3 Fig Fig K K3D Fig B/ K3D.5 3 Fig Three-dimensional effect (change of the drag coefficient by the draft). Fig Effect of the fracture surface. Fig Interaction effects. 31
32 -1-5 (Table.1.3-1,) 3 (Fig ) (Fig ) Fig Fig towing direction 1..8 L/B=., B/d=1. Boxbarge L B.6 d Y' V=.m/s V=.3m/s V=.4m/s Estimated β( deg.) (deg.) B Fig Model and outline of the experiment. Table Disabled Ship in drifting condition. L(m) B(m) d L/B Model A Fig Comparison of measured value of Y' and estimate of the Boxbarge. Model B L/B=., B/d=1. Boxbarge V=.m/s V=.3m/s V=.4m/s Estimated.1.5 L/B=., B/d=1. Boxbarge V=.m/s V=.3m/s V=.4m/s Estimated X' N' (deg.) β(deg.) Fig Comparison of measured value of X' and estimate of the Boxbarge (deg.) β(deg.) Fig Comparison of measured value of N' and estimate of the Boxbarge. 3
33 N F X Fig Model and setup of the experiment. F Y Hull Fig Coordinate system. Fig Coordinate system..58 Table m/sec 3 Table Experimental conditions (deg.) 6 6 Fig (deg.) 6, 3, 4, 6, 1,, 3, 6, 9, (deg.) 1, 15, 18 U(m/sec).6 Table m/sec 3 l Fig Table Fig Deckhouse model..4m/sec 3 l Fig Axial distribution of local drag Model AL/B=. Fig Table Principal dimensions of the model L(m) 1.8 B(m).3 d(m).16 coefficient of the 3- dimensional cylinder. 17 l 33
34 l Fig Estimated Distribution of local l drag coefficient along the length. estimated CDX of the model ship with Model BL/B=1. deckhouse. Table Fig Fig Comparison between measured and estimated CDY of the model ship with Table /1 1.8m.3m.m Fig (.58m(L).3m(B).144m(H)) Fig Fig Comparison between measured o-xyz and estimated CN of the model ship Fig Comparison between measured and deckhouse. with deckhouse. 34
35 - 3 7) 7) 3 Fig Fig Change by draft and drift angle Fig of the moment lever Lateral force coefficient Fig Table Moment Fig lever Fig Fig Method for estimating CN from Lateral force coefficient and Moment lever. 3 Fig C DX C DY =9 C N L Table Principal particulars of the model ship. VLCC L(m) 3. B(m).544 d(m).181 C B.83 l 35
36 Fig C N 3 Fig Method for estimating CN from lateral force coefficient and moment lever. Trim Heel Fig Estimated result of the change of X' Fig Estimated result of the change by the draft of VLCC. of Y' by the draft of VLCC.. Fig Estimated result of the change of N' by the draft of VLCC. Fig Comparison of estimated result of the change of N' by the draft and measured value 36
37 3-1 X Y 3 N N Fig ),9) N Fig B/d=3.6 Fig N Fig N N Fig Photo Experimental model that divided VLCC. Fig aft Y Fig N Fig Y VLCC SR1C 1 Table YN fore model A model B model C model D model E model F model G model H remained part Fig Division condition of the model.. Fig Change of Y by breakage. 37
38 N Fig Fig Table VLCC X Y N=45135 Fig Effect of gap of the division model deg. Y N Y Fig N Fig VLCC 3- Table F Y VLCC 1kgf XY L/B3 d/b/l N Photo Fig Fig Fig Model AH 9 F X kgf 3 Fig Rate of change of Y' by the breakage. Y Y 38
39 Fig Comparison between measured and estimated value of Y' of the breakage ship. Fig Comparison between measured and estimated value of N' of the breakage ship. Y Fig. 39
40 YYFig Fig =18 Y LL PP Y YK BRK Y L/LPP Y L/LPP=.5 Y 3 N 3 l L' Fig =18 N = Y 3 Fig Model-ACEG Fig Change of the estimate of N by the breakage. Y Fig L Y Fig N Fig. N ' '( L ) L YFig Y l / L Fig N Trim= deg. Trim=3 deg. Trim=6 deg. Fig Experimental condition on evaluation of the trim effect. Fig Change by Y' by Trim. 4
41 Heel deg. Heel 1deg. Heel deg. Fig Change of Y' by Heel. N N N 3-3 Y Fig XN Fig Fig Trim=,3,6deg.3 Photo.1.3- Fig Y Disabled Ship in drifting condition. Fig Prediction result of the drift resistance of the disabled ship. 41
42 Heel =,1,deg.3 Fig Fig by the Author, Chapter 3,8 (1965). Y 4) Y No.38(1989), pp.61. XN 5) (1985),pp ) 1 No.37(1989)pp ) 4 8) Photo Heel 3deg Table ) Fig Y 18deg (3), pp ) Horner, S. F.: Fluid Dynamic Drag, Published (197) pp ) (5).1.4 (1) 9 1) 99 (), pp ) 4
43 f Fig Concept of binocular stereo vision. xp = dxl(xlxr) yp = dyl(xlxr) = dyr(xlxr) zp = df (xlxr) () f d xl xr 3 (xp,yp,zp) yl yr y ( ) (-1) 3 Fig ( ) d (VGA 64 (,,) 48 [pixel]) ( xp,yp,zp) PL(xL,yL)PR( xr, yr) 43
44 (Toyo corporationhttp:// Fig. Fig D 3D Modeling using echosounding Photo Example of multibeam echosounder. (-) Fig Concept of shape measurement system 3 for floating object. Fig Photo Table Table Outline of function on multibeam echosounder system. Multibeam Echosounder (RESON SEABAT 815) ultrasonic wave swath breadth of sonic beam beam width of sonic beam khz 1 resolution 6 mm measuring frequency (MAX) weight in water 4 Hz 5 kg graphic display real time ship speed for observation (MAX) 1 kt. z m 3 y x (3) 44
45 No. 3 video camera target model laser rangefinder No. video camera No. 1 video camera f Photo.1.4- Outline of trinocular vision system Fig Concept of trinocular stereo vision. for 3D measurement. ( ) Fig GPS Fig D modeling of floating model using trinocular vision system. 3 Photo Fig (4) TV VGA (64*48 pixel) 45
46 3ch. Photo (A) (A1).9 +1 (A) Photo Fig VGA % 3 (5) Table.1.4-Matching result using template matching processing. position enlargement inclined angle X,Y [Pixel] rate [deg] A (-1.) (.) A (-1.1) ( -5. ) A (-.9) ( +1. ) () Photo Table.1.4- Photo Example of template matching processing. 46
47 A B 9 9 x Fig Dimension of towing bracket x BASE PLATE Rivet 33 19mm / 9 mm [ 6t mm] tf 6mm 19mm 9mm Fig Fig y No.3 T-75 1 BASE Rive t BRACKET 16 Fig Shackle: SB34 1 SHELL PLATE z Arrangement of rivet 45 6 Fig Strength of bracket for tow 3 47
48 5tf broken bracket Fig mm 9mm appearance of mother plate cut rivets Photo..1-1 Broken appearance_1 Photo mm Fig x =, Photo..1-9mm 5 Fig...1- Photo..1-1 Photo tf Photo..1- Broken appearance_ 48
49 1tf 5tf Fig tf 1 tf Fig Schematic idea of catch of drift ship by two boats Fig Drift ( ) Fig Fig Fig Catch of drift ship 49
50 a L =.5m b T LBd=.5m.45m.15m (L=.5m)1.6 (== =) Fig Towed ship and towline 8.m Table..1-1 Parameter of experiment 1cm 4m 4.m 4.m =156m /L=.6 3.m 3 kt wave generator deg. 3 deg Fig = /L Table..1.1 ab Fig ab T pier T ab ab Table..1- Table..1- Swing angle() and ship status angle() 3 carriage(x-axis) wave absorber 7m Fig Experimental arrangement in the basin Fig Ship status during tow LH=4.m carriage(y-axis) 4 m 5
51 4m kt Fig (L) /L T Fig Fig /L 1 ab /L.5 Fig Measurement of swing angle and towline force /L /L.5 /L Fig...-1 m 3 4m /L /L1 /L.5 /L.1.9 :tow point for emergency Fig Arrangement of towing points for emergency tow Fig Swing and ship status during tow Fig Idea of emergency tow point 51
52 Fig IWRC 6WS(36).4 Fig tf 6m 1m 3tf 4m.kg Fig A B 1) Fig...1- Base Plate ) 1 3) 4) D/d Fig a) Shackle Wire Rope 4m Ring m D= Fig Parts of ship capture net 8m Fig Example of ship capture net mm Table..1-3 Photo..1-3 D/d D/d Table..1-4 Photo tf mm b) mm Table
53 Table..1-3 Rope specimen Table..1-4 Test item and method Specimen Specimen Specimen Edge Specimen D/d=5 Specimen D/d=1 (a) For tensile test D/d=1 Photo..1-3 Rope specimen Specimen Edge D/d=1 (b) For axial friction test Photo..1.4 Appearance of metal fittings 53
54 Table..1-5 Result for static tensile test Fig Load and elongation curve Photo..1-5 D/d tensile test (specimen ) Photo..1-6 D/d tensile test (specimen ) Photo..1-7 D/d tensile test (specimen ) Fig Edge and D/d tensile test Table..1-6 Edge result and D/d tensile test result Fig tf tf 3 9.9tf 3 Photo..1-8 D/d tensile test (specimen ) / Photo..1-9 D/d tensile test Table..1-6 Fig (specimen ) 54
55 Specimen D/d=1 Specimen Edge Specimen D/d=1 Specimen Edge Specimen D/d=1 Specimen Edge Specimen D/d=1 Specimen Edge Specimen D/d=1 Specimen Edge Specimen D/d=1 Specimen Edge Photo..1-1 Axial friction test 55
56 D/d151 /1 /5 1 PET D/d Photo..1-5 D/d Photo Table..1-7 Photo D/d Table..1-8 D/d Photo Table..1-7 Result of axial friction test (D/d) Table..1-8 Result of axial friction test (edge) PLH-A(5,59 ) PL-C(993 ) 75mm4m 46.5tf PLH-A PLH-A PHL-A PL-C PL-C Photo Appearance of breakage parts of towline 56
57 PL-C Photo No.331 No.3637 PL-C PLH-A PLH-A PL-C PLH-A Fig PL-C Fig Photo No.16 No.18 No.1 Photo..1-1 No No.181 No. No.1 No.14 PLHA Photo Appearance of breakage parts of towline at first tow operation No.31 No.3 Fig Arrangement of towline on PLH-A No.36 No.37 Photo Appearance of breakage parts of towline at second tow operation No.43 No.44 Fig Arrangement of towline on PL-C Photo Appearance of breakage parts of breaking test 57
58 Photo No.4344 Photo No.5,6 No.4,41 c) Photo No.1516 No.19 Photo No.3133 No Photo No.34 No.19 No. Photo Details of breakage parts of towline at first tow operation d) No.31 Photo No.15,19, Photo No.31,33,37,39Photo No.3,4 Photo No.45,47 e) ( ) No.15 No.31 No.37 No.4 No.16 No.33 No.39 Photo Appearance of breakage parts of towline at second tow operation No.3 Photo Appearance of breakage parts of towline cut by knife No.5 No.6 No.45 No.47 Photo Appearance of breakage parts of towline at first tow operation No.4 No.41 Photo Appearance of towline at first and second tow operations 58
59 f) Table..1-9 Towline tension at break Table..1-9 g) Fig )678.5 JIS F7 =R/r (-4-4) Table 9 Fig h) Fig...1- PLH-A PL-C.5 (-4-3) (3) 1) 1m ) 59
60 3) 4) 5) 6) 1) (197) ) (1998) 3) Kite Towing System 34 3 (1995) 5) 1967 Fig Number of towed ships by gross tonnage Fig...1- Towing sea area 1) () pp (1984) pp ) 13) 1 5 6) GUIDELINESSecond Edition (1997) ) ) (1993) pp ) OCIMF MOORING EQUIPMENT (1) 9) 1) 15 (3) pp ) (1-1) Fig m.3m.m.16m 1/1 () pp
61 (Table..-1) (.58m.3m.144m) 1 ( 1.78m) Fig...-1 Schematic idea of model ship. Table..-1 Principal dimension of the ( 6.16g/cm) (LED) 3 PSD LED kt4kt 6kt (Fn =.45,.49,.735)(PSD) 8kt(Fn=.98) 4m (1-).5~. (1--1) Fig...- Table..- Cd (4.97 ) (.7 ) Cd = T /( ρbdv / ) (T ρ B 3 ( V ) 15m 7.5m3.5m) ( ) T model ship. length 1.8m breadth.3m draught.16m depth.m KG.135m GM.48m
62 Cd 1) Table..-3 Table..-4 Table..-3 Fig...-4 Cd Table..-4 (Table..-4 )Cd 16% (Table..-4 ~) (Table..-4 ~) (Table..-4 ~) (Table..-3 ) Cd 6% Cd Table..- Experimental condition. Fig...-3 (,4,6,8kt) Table..-3.4~.6 (Table..-3 ~) (Table..-3 Fig...- Towing conditions in stern tow. ) kt~4kt 3 (Table..-4 ) 6
63 ( ) Table..-4 ~ 3 6kt Fig...-5 Table..-3 Towing resistance coefficient in bow tow. Table..-4 Towing resistance coefficient in stern tow. 63
64 ( ) 3 Fig...-3 Comparison of towing resistance coefficient in bow tow Fig...-4 Comparison of towing resistance coefficient in stern tow Fig...-5 Schematic idea of broken model ship Fig...-6 Comparison of non-dimensional yaw (1--) period against towing speed. kt 4kt 1/ 1/4 4kt kt 1/ 1/4 (Table..-4 )4kt 6kt )3) Fig...-6 ( / ) 64
65 ) 4)5) (Table..-4 ) (Table..-4 ) Fig...-7~Fig kt ( ) ( ) % ( ) Fig...-7 Fig kt ( ) (Fig...-8)Fig...-9~Fig...-1 kt~6kt 4kt kt 4kt Fig...-1 Fig...-1 kt 4kt kt 6) (1--3) Fig (Table..- ) 8kt Fig (Table..- ) 6kt 5 ) 65
66 Fig (Table..-4 ) Fig (1) 6kt () (1--4) (3) Fig...-7 Yaw period (small trim). ( ) 6kt 3 Fig...-1 Yaw amplitude (large trim). Fig...-8 Yaw period (large trim). Fig Sway amplitude (small trim). Fig...-9 Yaw amplitude(small trim). Fig...-1 Sway amplitude (large trim). 66
67 (1-3) (1-3-1) 7) 1/1 1.8m.3m.m.16m 7) (Fig...-1) ) 5 4 3) 3 Fig Comparison of towline tension in different towing speed. Fig Comparison of towline tension in different towing direction Fig Comparison of towline tension on damaged condition. (.58m.3m.144m) Fig ( 1.78m) ( 6.16g/cm) Table..-5 6kt( ) 7.8kt (.115m.11m) 4.9 ( ) ( ).8 / 67
68 1..8 ) 7) Z/a.5 3 ( 15m 7.5m3.5m) ( 5m8m 4.5m) ( 1 ).5 LED 3 PSD (1-3-) (1-3-3) /L Fig Response Amplitude /L ( ) Fig Response Fig Amplitude Operator of surge. 1.5 /ka Exp. kt Exp..6kt Exp. 5.kt Exp. 7.8kt Cal. kt 1.8 Exp. kt 1.6 Exp..6kt.6kt 5.kt 1.4 Exp. 5.kt PSD 1. Exp. 7.8kt 1 Cal. kt.8 7.8kt Fig...-16~Fig /L Fig Response.8 Amplitude Operator of pitch. X/a Exp. kt Exp..6kt Exp. 5.kt Exp. 7.8kt Cal. kt Table..-5 Experimental condition. Operator of heave. 68
69 4 Fig...- yaw period Fig Yawng period duringi unstable motion in head waves. (4kt ) Fig...-1 Fig...- T Ψ (sec) head waves kt(reg) 4kt 6kt kt in still water(exp.) 4kt in still water(exp.) 6kt in still water(exp.).6kt(irreg. 5.kt 7.8kt.6kt in still water(exp.) 5.kt in still water(exp.) 7.8kt in still water(exp.) λ/l 7) Fig...- Yawng amplitude duringi unstable motion in head waves. Fig kt 5.9.6kt 5.kt(.63) (1-3-4) / 4) 5) Fig
70 Fig...-5 Fig...-6 ( ) ( )4 3 Fig...-1 Yawing period during unstable motion in following waves. Fig...- Yawing amplitude during unstable motion in following waves Fig...-4 Towline tension in still water (bow tow, bow trim, immersed and capsized condition). Fig...-5 Towline tension in still water (stern tow, bow trim, immersed and capsized condition). Fig...-3Non-dimensionalyawing period during unstablemotion in following waves Fig...-6 owline tension of broken ship in still water (stern tow, even keel, off-center tow). 7
71 8) Newman 9) 3 1) (Fig...-7 Fig...-8) Taw ρgb ha /L ρ g ha B L Fig...-7 λ/l=1.1 Fig ) 7).8 Fig...-9 Fig...-8 (Fig...-3) λ/l=1.5 7) (Fig...-31) Fig % 7) λ/l=1. Fig ~6 4~5 (1-3-5) ( ) (1) 71
72 T aw /(rgb Ha /L) stern tow, stern trim, upright kt 4kt 6kt Cal. kt T aw /(rgb Ha /L) bow tow, stern trim, capsize kt kt 4kt 6kt Cal. kt /L Fig...-7 Towline tension increase in waves (stern tow, stern trim, upright) /L Fig...-3 Towline tension increase in waves (bow tow, stern trim, capsize). T aw /(rgb Ha /L) stern tow, stern trim, capsize kt 4kt 6kt Cal. kt T aw /(rgb Ha /L) bow tow, bow trim, capsize kt kt 4kt 6kt Cal. kt /L.5 3 Fig...-8Towline tension increase in waves (stern tow, stern trim, capsize) /L.5 3 Fig Towline tension increase in waves (bow tow, bow trim, capsize). T aw /(rgb Ha /L) stern tow, stern trim, capsize (trim =.8deg) kt kt 4kt 6kt Cal. kt T aw /(rgb Ha /L) stern tow, bow trim, capsize kt kt 4kt 6kt Cal. kt /L Fig...-9 Towline tension increase in waves (stern tow, stern trim, capsize, small trim) /L Fig...-3 Towline tension increase in waves (stern tow, bow trim, capsize). () (4) (3) 7 ()
73 KGPS( GPS) PM-D KGPS PL-B 1 1 (-1) PL (PL-B) PM PM-D 3km ~14 Fig KGPS Table..-7 PL-B PM-D ( )( ~) PM-D PL-B ( )PL-B PL-B ( PM-D ) Fig Comparison of towline tension on damaged condition ( ) PL-B ( ) JISF mm (Photo..-1) Table..-6 (Photo..-) PL-B 1 ( MS75) KGPS 1 (47) PL-B PL-B 1.57m PM-D 1 PL-B Table..-6 Main dimension of tow and towed ship. 65mm165m (.15kg/m) (-) 73
74 Table..-7 Experimental conditions at sea. Exp. No. time speed(kt) Patrol Vessel 'PL-B' straight 1Hz KGPS 1Hz KGPS XY( ) H( ) course change right turn left turn 14143,4,6 straight straight straight Patrol Vessel 'PM-D' straight follow rudder angle(deg) tow ship PL-B PL-B straight 7 PL-B straight 7 PL-B straight PM-D turn 7 PM-D turn 7,15,3 PM-D (-3) ~4m/sec Fig Fig KGPS PL-B PM-D 11.64m 5.m PL-B 1.6cm.1% PM-D 19.6cm.4% KGPS (Table..-7 ) Fig KGPS PL-B PM-D Photo..-1 Tension meter installed at bow. Photo..- Tension meter installed PL-B at stern Fig PL-B.96 Fig sec Fig
75 A B Tb AB l1 A B lb = l la lc = hb ( hb + ) (3) w la lb da db A B d Ta Tb TA TB lc 1) la ha ( ha + d Ta ) w = (1) T wl a a a = sinh 1 () w Ta b = l 1 l c d a Tb w( l l = sinh 1 w T a a l ) c (4) T a = T b (5) a T = T + ( wl ) a A b T = T + ( wlb ) B (6) (7) k l tow ship towed ship MS75 GPS antenna MS75 MS75 tow ship MS75 towed ship towline OSMIV 47 Fig Measuring system using KGPS. Fig Changeof distance between two antennas in Patrol Vessel PL-B. Fig Change of distance between two antennas in Patrol Vessel PM-D. 75
76 Fig Time history of towline tension. ' Ta + ( wla ) l = l + k Fig Head angle of tow and towed ship. Tb = ( hb h')( hb h' ) (1) w Fig (8) PM-D ( ) h (1) 11.6tf (3) Ta la = ( ha h')( ha h' + ) w l lc b + = (11) l 1 = d a + d b (1) l1 TBdadb h Fig...-4 ( ) 3% k.35(tf/m) ha hb 4.89m 4.35m da db lc l1 353m lc h 1m 11) PL-B (9) 89sec T A Tb T B hb B l 1 la A ha Ta da Fig Schematic idea of towline figure during towing. 76
77 6kt Fig KGPS Fig KGPS Fig sec 33m KGPS ~3% Fig...-4 (TB) PL-B Fig (db) Fig...-4 Numerical calculation of towline tension and figure. ( 3mm) 13)14).3(tf/m)1.5%.35(tf/m)9% Fig...-4 Comparison between towline tension and distance from towed point to sea surface. Fig Towline tension and distance between tow and towed ship. Fig Relation between towline tension and elongation. 77
78 PLH-A 9.357(tf/m) PL-C PLH-A 65mm 15(g/m).96 E 5.3(kgf/mm ) (-4) KGPS ( T7~T1) (1) PL-C 3 15 PL-C 1 () 65mm 5.3(kgf/mm ) ( T6~T1) 75mmm (3) () 15), GPS,Gross tonnage (t) 993 5,59 Displacement (t) 1,5 5,317 ( T6) PL-C 3 PLH-A 7 ( 9 ), PLH-A PL-C PLH-A PL-C 3 7 ( 11) :.8kg/m 46.5tf) Table..-8 Principal dimension of tow and towed ship. Patrol Vessel PL-C Length over all (m) Maximum breadth (m) Depth (m) Patrol Vessel PLH-A (3-1) (3-1-1) Table PL PL-C) 3 PL PLH-A) (Fig...-44) ~1 7~8 9 1 Table PL-C PLH-A (, T1~T4) PL-C Izu Pen. Sagami Bay Izu Island N34 44' E139 36' Tokyo Bay Boso Pen. Within this circle of 5 nautical mile radius Fig Experimental site. 78
79 /1/9 /1/1 (3-1-) PL-C PLH-A Table..-1 Table..-11 PL-C PLH-A 3, Table..-9 Experimental conditions (tow). 1, PL-C PL-C Table..-11 Measuring item and 3m measuring device at Patrol Vessel PLH-A ( ) date Exp. No. time speed (kt) T1 13:39-14:5 3kt T 14:5-14:6 3kt T3 15:3-15: 5kt T4 15:-15:44 5kt T5 9:4-9:5 3kt T6 9:5-1:1 3kt l T7 13:19-13:3 3kt T8 13:3-13:5 3kt T9 14:7-14:5 3kt T1 14:5-14:5 3kt JISF333 PLH-A Fig KGPS4 Patrol Vessel Patrol Vessel rudder angle PL-C PLH-A (deg) tow ship straight straight PL-C right turn follow 7 PL-C straight straight PL-C right turn follow 15 PL-C straight straight PL-C eft turn follow 15 PL-C straight straight PLH-A follow right turn 7 PLH-A straight straight PLH-A follow right turn 15 PLH-A Table..-1 Measuring item and measuring device at Patrol Vessel PL-C. measuring item wave height pitch roll sway acc. surge acc. heave acc. wave compensation measuring item tension roll pitch sway acc. surge acc. heave acc. Patrol Vessel PLH-A Moving base Master receiver GPS receiver (MS75) Slave No.1 GPS receiver (74Msi) RS-3C Signal distributor Data transmitter measuring device ultrasonic wave probe optical fiber gyro optical fiber gyro optical fiber gyro optical fiber gyro optical fiber gyro accelerometer measuring device tension meter vibrating structure gyro vibrating structure gyro 3 axis accelerometer 3 axis accelerometer 3 axis accelerometer Patrol Vessel PL-C Data receiver RS-3C Signal distributor Slave No. GPS receiver (74Msi) Slave No.3 GPS receiver (74Msi) Fig Moving KGPS system. 79
80 KGPS, PL-C 1 (MS.3%PLH-A.1% Msi-3 )PLH-A 1 GPS 3 PLH-A 1 DGPS Fig Fig kt KGPS PL-C PLH-A 17.17m PLH-A PL-C 1.8m 1.64tf/m.353tf/m 4.6 1Hz KGPS 5Hz KGPS X Y( ) H( ) GPS 3 ~1 (3-) (3--1) ~18m/sec,1~m Fig T5~T6 18 PL-C PLH-A PLH-A 13tf 18.8tf 7 PLH-A KGPS PL-C 16) PLH-A, 5cm 15cm 8 distance between two ships (m) 6 PLH-A 54 head direction 48 (deg) 4 distance between two ships (m) PL-A head direction (deg) PL-C distance between two ships (m) 8:59: 9:1 9: 9:3 9:4 9:5 1: 1:1 1: Time distance PL-C head direction (deg) towline tension (tf) towline tension (tf) 1:7 16 Towline snapped Fig Distance between PL-C and PL-A, head direction and towline tension. (tow ship : PL-C, towed ship : PL-A, stern tow) towline tension (tf) 5 4 tension 57 9:35 6 9:4 63 9: :5 69 9:55 1: 7 Time Fig Time history of distancebetween two ships and towline tension (/1/1)
81 m 1 m k T KGPS 14% T6~T1 PL-C PL-C T5 T6 1% 1.64tf/m 3kt T tf/m % (3-3) T1 PL-C KGPS (3--) (1) Fig towline tension (tf) 18 Fig A B AB l 1 1 A B 1 8 la lb 6 d a d b A B 4 Ta Tb distance between two ships (m) TA TB ' l c h Fig...-48Relation between distance and towline tension. (9:45-9:5, /1/1) 4.353tf/m Fig % Fig T = π (13) 1 1 k + m1 m Table..-8 PL-C PLH-A [m],[tf] lc db l 1 [m] da T B *1 h'*1 Fig...-49Numerical calculation of towline tension and figure. 81
82 () 1) 16) 3 (1985)pp ) 186 (1999) pp ()pp ) (1) 5 (1988)pp ) (1) (1989)pp ) 6 (1996) pp ) 33 ()pp ) Maruo,H.The Drift of a Body Floating on Waves, Journal of Ship Research, Vol.4, No.3, (196)pp.1-1 9) Newman,J.N. The Drift Force and Moment on Ships in Waves, Journal of Ship Research. Vol.11, No.1, (1967) pp ) 31 3 (1994)pp ) 1) ( 3 ) 44 1 (1998)pp ) (1993)pp ) Hyunkyoung Shin, Kenji Yamakawa, Shoichi Hara Laboratory Tests on Synthetic Fiber Ropes, OMAE94, (1994), pp ) 37 ()pp ()pp ) 54 Table..3-1Principal dimensions 8
83 Fig Self-propulsion. Fig...3- Horse power estimation. 1 t ( ) 1wT T aw =(T w T )/(ρgζ w B / L PP ) R aw =(R w R )/(ρgζ w B / L PP ) Q aw =(Q w Q )/(ρgζ w DB / L PP ) N aw =(N w N ) VD 3 /(gζ w B / L PP ) R,T,Q,N : in still water with tow load 83
84 Fig Amplitude of heave, pitch & surge Fig Example of self-propulsion test results. 84
85 Fig Propulsive performance in irregular waves. Fig Towing power in still water. Fig Towing power in irregular waves. Fig Towing power of PL-C in still water (495rpm). Table..3-Principal dimensions of Patrol Vessels. Fig Towing power of PM-D in still water (38rpm). 85
86 (JA) (KT) Fig Speed, pitch angle and towline tension in still water. Fig Weather conditions. 86
87 Fig Speed, Blade angle and Towline tension in waves. 87
88 PM-D PL-B PM-D PM-D..4. (1) (Photo..4-1) 88
89 () Fig o -xy (i=1) (i=) o i-x iy i Li U& ( m i + m xi ) U i U T ( m + m ) i + T Towed Point VC ( m m ) r sin( ψ + ψ ) yi xi ( m + m ) VC ( m m ) r cos( ψ + ψ ) xi + L U ( m + m ) i i i ( I zzi + i zzi ) r i + r& i = N i i yi yi i i i i yi Li U& i i i i U sin β & β cos β i U i + U i U i U& Li cos β i & β i sin β i i i xi i i U L i i i i i C r sin β = X C r cos β = Y X = X V Cψ C Y = Y H 1) i i (1) () l l : Length of Towline Fig...4- Definition of towline x o Photo U Wind A o V A X', x H f Wrecked fore part of "ERIKA". Wave W l T' N', r' H Y', y H T' 1 N', r' H1 1 a o 1 U 1 1 X', x H1 1 Y', y H1 1 Ship1Tow Ship V C C Current ShipTowed Ship Fig Coordinate y p ) (p)(s) X = X H T T Tow Point 1 1 Y = Y 1 H1 H1 N = N H1 + N + N H N = N + Y H + X P1( p, s) R1( p, s) + y ( X P1( p) X P1( s) ) + y ( X X ) R1( p, s) p R1( p) R1( s) A1 + Y p + N + X A + N A A + Y W1 + Y W + X A1 + N + X ' + N W W A1 + Y T1 + Y T + X W1 + X T + N T W1 + Y T1 + X T1 () AW T 1) Isherwood 1) y 89
90 X Y Wi Wi N Wi = C = C X YWi = C ( κ, λ / Li ) gha / d iu Wi i ( κ, λ / Li ) gha / d iu i ( κ, λ / L ) gh / d U NWi i a i C XWiC YWi C NWi X T = T cosε κ λ/li Y T = T sin ε h a f N T = T sin L i (3) T af l l Fig...4- l T l = T 1 ω sinh ω l T (4) T T = T ω l + (5) ω T ψ i r i k l l = l T ω l + k (6) T (4) (6) T 3 ω l ω l T + ( ) = k l l 4T (7) T, T T i, T i = 1 ρlid iu i X Ti X Ti X Ti X T1 N T1 N T1 = T cos = T sin 1 1 = T 1 ( ψ 1 ψ ε ) ( ψ ψ ε ) a L 1 1 sin ( ψ ψ ε ) ε 1 (8) ε 1 ε& = { U l a r 1U L 1 U 1 f L sin 1 r U sin ( ε + β ) ( ψ + ε ψ ) ( ψ + ε ψ + β ) cos U cos L U i i = ri Li 1 r 1 1 (9) ψ& (1) (1) (9) (1) Table..4-1 Principal particulars. Tow Ship Towed Ship (Wreckage) L (m) B (m) d (m) C B.58 A f (m ) 13. As (m ) 55. L OA (m) Table..4- Location of tow and towed points. Posture of towed ship a (m) f (m) Upright Capsize Table..4-3 Calculation conditions. Wind North Wind, V A =15 (m/s) Wave H 1/3 =3 (m), T H 1/3 =9 (sec.) 9
91 Photo..4- (3) (3-1) Table..4-1 CPP 1 SR1 VLCC (SR1C ) 3) S.S.71/ X H Y H N H 1/17 5) Bodyplan Photo..4-6(deg.) Fig S.S.8 S.S.71/ 4) (3-) General view of towed ship. (a) Tow ship F.P. 91/ L.W.L. (b) Towed ship (Wrecked fore part) Fig Bodyplans of tow and towed ships. 9 81/ 8 71/ 6(deg.) 4),5) U 1 1(knot) (knot) 6(mm) 6(m) 15.8(kg/m) l 3.5% 6) a, f Table..4- ±(deg.) ( p, s) = K r K ( ψ 1 ψ m ) + K ( ψ ψ ε ) + K d l Upright Fig δ (11) ψ m d l K 1~K 4 Table ) (3-3) Fig Isherwood 1) C XA, C YA C NA ψ A Fig X HY H N H Upright N H Upright 4 91
92 C XWi, C YWi U 1 (knot) C NWi 3 8) (deg.) U 1 (knot) 9) SurgeSwayYaw 3 β 1 Yaw Upright T 3(tonf) C YWC NW C XW 6(deg.) Upright (Fig...4-8(b),(d)) β 1 ψ W -(deg.) (3-4) U 1 1(knot) 6(tonf) (knot) 1(tonf) Fig T ~9(deg.) 1(deg.) Fig...4-7(a)~(d) Fig...4-8(a) ~(d) (knot) 3(sec.) (a)(b) U 1 1(knot) (c)(d) U 1 1(knot) U 1 (knot) (deg.) 6(deg.) 1(knot) 6(sec.) Upright (deg.) Upright U1 1(knot) (deg.) (knot) U 1 (knot) 3(deg.) 4(deg.)5(deg.) 1 Upright 6(deg.) ψ -~(deg.) 4 T U 1 1(knot) ~(deg.) 1 3(deg.) T 1 T 9
93 1. C XA1, C YA1, C NA Fig : C XA1 -.8 : C YA1 : C NA Wind direction ψ Α (deg.) Wind force and moment coefficients acting : r' =. : r' =. : r' = X' H Upright Drift angle β (deg.) X' H Capsize Drift angle β (deg.) Y' H Upright Drift angle β (deg.) Y' H Capsize Drift angle β (deg.) N' H Upright Drift angle β (deg.) N' H Capsize Drift angle β (deg.) Fig Hydrodynamic forces acting on towed ship (stern trim 6 deg.). : C XW1 (Cal.) : C YW1 (Cal.) : C NW1 (Cal.) : C XW (Exp.) : C YW (Exp.) : C NW (Exp.) C XW1, C YW1, C NW Encounter angle ψ W (deg.) 1.6 C XW, C YW, C NW Upright Encounter angle ψ W (deg.) 1.6 C XW, C YW, C NW Capsize Encounter angle ψ W (deg.) Fig Wave drifting force and moment coefficients acting on tow and towed ships. 93
94 x / L Wind Wave Current t = 6 (sec.) t = (sec.) (a) U 1 = 1 (knot) ψ A,W = (deg.) 8 x / L Unstable Wind Wave Current t = (sec.) t = (sec.) y / L y / L y / L y / L (b) U 1 = 1 (knot) ψ A,W = 6 (deg.) 8 x / L t = 6 (sec.) Current t = (sec.) (c) U 1 = (knot) ψ A,W = (deg.) 8 x / L Unstable Wind Wave Current (d) U 1 = (knot) ψ A,W = 6 (deg.) 6 : β 1 : ψ 1 : β : ψ 1 β 1,, ψ 1, (deg.) (a) U 1 = 1 (knot), ψ A,W = (deg.) Tension (tonf) (a) U 1 = 1 (knot), ψ A,W = (deg.) β 1,, ψ 1, (deg.) (b) U 1 = 1 (knot), ψ A,W = 6 (deg.) Tension (tonf) (b) U 1 = 1 (knot), ψ A,W = 6 (deg.) β 1,, ψ 1, (deg.) (c) U 1 = (knot), ψ A,W = (deg.) Tension (tonf) (c) U 1 = (knot), ψ A,W = (deg.) β 1,, ψ 1, (deg.) (d) U 1 = (knot), ψ A,W = 6 (deg.) Tension (tonf) (d) U 1 = (knot), ψ A,W = 6 (deg.) Time (sec.) Fig Trajectories of tow and towed ships and time histories of towing motion (Upright) 94
95 x / L Wind Wave Current t = 6 (sec.) t = (sec.) y / L y / L y / L y / L (a) U 1 = 1 (knot) ψ A,W = (deg.) x / L Wind Wave Current t = 6 (sec.) t = (sec.) (b) U 1 = 1 (knot) ψ A,W = 6 (deg.) 8 x / L t = 6 (sec.) Current t = (sec.) (c) U 1 = (knot) ψ A,W = (deg.) 8 x / L t = 6 (sec.) Current t = (sec.) (d) U 1 = (knot) ψ A,W = 6 (deg.) 6 : β 1 : ψ 1 : β : ψ 1 β 1,, ψ 1, (deg.) (a) U 1 = 1 (knot), ψ A,W = (deg.) Tension (tonf) (a) U 1 = 1 (knot), ψ A,W = (deg.) β 1,, ψ 1, (deg.) (b) U 1 = 1 (knot), ψ A,W = 6 (deg.) Tension (tonf) (b) U 1 = 1 (knot), ψ A,W = 6 (deg.) β 1,, ψ 1, (deg.) (c) U 1 = (knot), ψ A,W = (deg.) Tension (tonf) (c) U 1 = (knot), ψ A,W = (deg.) β 1,, ψ 1, (deg.) (d) U 1 = (knot), ψ A,W = 6 (deg.) Tension (tonf) (d) U 1 = (knot), ψ A,W = 6 (deg.) Time (sec.) Fig Trajectories of tow and towed ships and time histories of towing motion (Capsize) 95
96 Wind and Wave Direction (deg.) 3 1 Current 4 (tonf) Wind and Wave Direction (deg.) 3 1 Current 4 (m) Wind and Wave Direction (deg.) 3 1 Current 5 (PS) (tonf) Upright : 1 (knot) : (knot) 3 (a) Tension (m) Upright : 1 (knot) : (knot) 3 1 (b) Unstable motion amp (PS) Upright : 1 (knot) : (knot) 4 3 (c) EHP 1 1 Wind and Wave Direction (deg.) 3 1 Current 4 (tonf) Wind and Wave Direction (deg.) 3 1 Current 4 (m) Wind and Wave Direction (deg.) 3 1 Current 5 (PS) (tonf) Capsize : 1 (knot) : (knot) 3 (a) Tension (m) Capsize : 1 (knot) : (knot) 3 1 (b) Unstable motion amp (PS) Capsize : 1 (knot) : (knot) 4 3 (c) EHP 1 1 Fig Estimation of towing tension, amplitude of unstable motion and EHP 5~7(deg.) ψ 1 T T (4) T ~5(deg.) Fig EHP ~3% T 96
97 Upright ~(deg.) 5~7(deg.) 1) Kijima, K., Katsuno, T., Nakiri, Y. and Furukawa, Y.On the Manoeu- vring Performance of a Ship with the Parameter of Loading Condition, 168 (199) pp ) 163 (1988) pp ) () 1 ( ) (1995) 4) 186 (1999)pp ) 74 ()pp ) (16 ) 7) 1 (1997) 8) 31 3 (1994) pp ) 1 (1)pp ) Isherwood R.M. Wind Resistance of Merchant Ships, The Royal Institution of Naval Architects, Vol.115, (197), pp
98 3. (1) ( ) () 3 Ve(kt) (A) (B) A/B Vw B A Ve = (1) Vw (m/sec) ±15 Vc(kt) φ Vw sinϕ /.45 Vw Vc = () 45 Vs(kt) (3) (Vv).1.. ( ) 3 1/ 3 1/ = λ π H B dz e k g H C C B Lg V B kz D W V (3) L B CW CD g H 1/3 ( H 1/3 /1.6 ) λ k = π /λ 98
99 T λ = T g /π.1.. GM χ MKS (4) (3) (3) a) (3) b) C C W D C W (3) 3 C D Fig. 3-1Fig. 3- C W /C D χ λ/l 3 Fig Fig. 3- B L d λ/l C W /C D L kz kz e dz e dz 1 B d {1 kd = e } C W / B Ld kd (4) C D Fig. 3- χ Fig. 3-3~Fig. 3-5 C W /C D χ 3 B L B Ld C W /C D χ kd Fig. 3-1 (4) 99
100 1 kd {1 e } 1 kd kd (5) (4) kd Fig.3-6 Fig. 3-1 Value of C W /C D Fig. 3- Value of C W /C D (tanker 15DWT, full load). (observation ship, full load). λ / L λ / L λ / L Fig. 3-3 Value of C W /C D (Tanker 15DWT) (mean value with respect to wave encounter angle) λ / L Fig. 3-4 Value of C W /C (Cargo) D (mean value with respect to wave encounter angle) 1
101 λ / L {1-exp(-kd)} / kd λ / L kd Fig. 3-5 Value of C W /C D (PCC) (mean value with respect to wave encounter angle) Fig. 3-6Plotting of equation (4) near kd=. Table 3-1 Ship for drift motion prediction. Fig. 3-7 Ship during drift. (5) (Vv) Vs Vc Ve Vv Table 3-1 Fig a) b) Ve (1) A/B=1.3.68( ) 15 Vc () Vv (3) L=95m d=5.4m c) (B=Ld ) Table 3-1:
102 1.8~13.8m/s.5~4.m ~4m 1.3m/s 3.3m Fig ~ ( 1m ) m 1.8 Fig. 3-8 prediction curve of wave Table 3- drift course and weather condition. date time place ship inclination current direction current speed (kn) wind direction wind force wave swell drift direction and speed N 1/ ENE 5 ENE E N 4- L3 5.3 ENE 6 ENE E N ENE 7 ENE N ENE 6 ENE E N 7- L ENE 6 ENE E 5-1.3N 8- L15 ENE 7 ENE E 5-8.5N 9- L ENE 7 ENE E 5-6.9N 1- L15 ENE 7 ENE E 5-4N 11- L E 7 E E 5-3N 1- L E 6 E-5 ENE E 5-1.1N 13- L15 E 6 E-4 14-E N 14- L E N 141.4E 4-58N 16- L E NE-3 NE-3 NE-3 NE-3 NE-3 NE-3 NE-3 NE-3 ENE-3 ENE-3 1.kn L15 ENE 6 E-3 ENE E 5 E-3 ENE
103 d) Fig m/s m (6) North Latitude 4.95 Predictions Actual drifting path Ocean current + Wind drift components Ocean current + Wind drift + Wave drift components Wavedrift component Ocean current component East Longitude Fig. 3-9result of drift course prediction. 1) pp ) Vol.19pp ) Tanizawa, K. and Minami, M., : On the drifting speed of floating bodies in waves, Proc. 1 th ISOPE Conf. Vol.3, (), pp
104 4. (1) ( ) Table 4-1 ()(LBD) 1) 4.1. (Optimum Towing Support System: OTSS) 3) (Light Weight) DOS/V OS (L B D )/(LBD) Windows ( ) 64Mb ( 18Mb )CPU 4MHz HD Mb Visual Basic FORTRAN C++ Deck )deck 3) ViewPoint 1Kbyte 4) D-WEB D-WEB 14 LBD ) (Compartment) BD No (Basic Weight) (Local Weight) Weight () Table 4-1 Main particulars of type ships. 1) 4 1 5)
105 (3) ( ) 1) (4) ) (FSE:Free Surface Effect) (GG) 3) ( (6) ( ) 4) )(LBD) (VCG) 5) GZ (5) ) (Typeship) ( (7) ( ) The start of OTSS Calculation of hydrodynamic force and motion (If you only refer to past results or default, you don t need to calculate.) Animation Input style New Past results Default Go to main screen select select Go to main screen Input items Sea conditions Principal dimension of disabled ship Broken condition of disabled ship & calculation of center of gravity and GZ-curve Longitudinal strength Form of submerged part damage stability Specifications of towline and tow ship Steady drift calculation Maneuver simulation (If you only refer to past results or default, you don t need to calculate.) Save of input data and results End Drift speed Drift direction Towline tension Amplitude of unstable motion Effective horse power Trajectory of tow ship and towed ship Fig. 4-1 Flow of Optimum Towing Support System. 15
106 (8) (S.F.) S.F. (B.M.) ) Fig. 4-1 ) (1) OTSS 3) (9) ( ) 3 (a) (1) 4-3) (b) (11) (Fig. 4-) () (Fig. Save Fig. 4- Display for the start. Fig. 4-3 Main menu display. 16
107 (c) ( ) (3) (a) (b) ( PCC( ) ( ) (c) (Fig. 4-4) Upright Normal Upright Broken Capsize Normal Capsize Broken ( ) ( ) ( ) * Sumcalc.exe GZ ) ( ) Wtrmesh.txt 3 DTH (d) (Fig. 4-5) 1kt 1 Fig. 4-4 Input menu for ship status. Fig. 4-5 Input menu for tow ship and towline. 17
108 Fig. 4-6 Display for animation. Fig. 4-7 Display for drift prediction. Cut_Res: Reset: Motion_Ani: Fig. 4-8 Display for the results of towline tension and unstable motion. (4) ( ) (6) MS-DOS 6) MS-DOS (Fig. 4-6) (7) (Fig. 4-8) 1 18 Water Opac Low: Water Opac Res: Naked ON: Naked Off: Cut: (5) (Fig. 4-7) 5) 1
109 Fig. 4-9 Display for the results of trajectory of tow and towed ship. Engine room Broken position A.P.T. Slop tank Table (1) () (3) (4) F.W.T. F.O.T. Fig kt Fig. 4-1 (8) (Fig. 4-9) ( ) ( ) 1 ( XG q, YGq, ZGq ) ( d e, te, he ) e e C.O.T. B.W.T. F.P.T. Fig. 4-1 Tank arrangement of 15DWT. tanker. (1) Fig ( ) /3 t ( d e, te, he ) W q e h W q = e (1) t e XG q = ( KGq ZBe ) + Lpp q e q XB e e e () YG = tan( h )( KG ZB ) + YB (3) ( e e e XB, YB, ZB ) d e 19
110 Initial condition Damage 1 Damage Damage 3 GZ(m) Initial condition damage damage4 damage6 damage8 damage1 damage3 damage5 damage Damage 4 Damage 5 Damage 6 Damage 7 Damage 8 Damage 9 Fig Damage procedure of aft part of broken tanker. Initial condition Damage Heel(deg) Fig GZ curve of damaged full loaded condition. D raft, Trim, Heel 3 Draft (m) (ballast) Trim (deg) (ballast) Heel (deg) (ballast) Draft (m) (full) Trim (deg) (full) Heel (deg) (full) Damage Damage Damage 4 Damage 5 Damage 6-1 Initial Damage 1 Damage Damage 3 Damage 4 Damage Damage 6 Damage 7 Damage 8 condition Fig Change of ship status on upright full loaded condition (1/3 aft part). Fig. 4-1 Damage procedure of fore part of 11 e = ρ P p V ϕ, d, t, h ) (4) w j j ( j e e e p jξ x ( ϕ j, de, te, he ) XBe = (5) p V ( ϕ, d, t, h ) j j j e e e e p jξ y ( ϕ j, de, te, he ) YBe = (6) p V ( ϕ, d, t, h ) p jξ z ( ϕ j, de, te, he ) ZBe = (7) p V ( ϕ, d, t, h ) j j e ρ : w P : p j : V ϕ, d, t, h ) ( j e e e ( de e e broken tanker. e e e e : ϕ j, t, h ) () Fig GZ -85 ~85 8 Fig ( ) Fig Fig. 4-16( ) ξ u ( ϕ j, de, te, he ) : ϕ j ( d,, ) u(xyz) e te he /3
111 Table 4- Drift motion (wind only). Ship Type Cargo Fishing boat PCC Tanker Solution No. drift speed (kt) drift direction (deg) head direction (deg) Table 4-3 Drift motion (wind and waves). Bending moment (MT-M) Fig Definition of ship status. Bending moment Shear force Shear force (MT) From A.P. (m) Fig Shear force and bending moment on upright full loaded condition (1/3 aft part). Draft, Trim, Heel Draft (m) (ballast) Trim (deg) (ballast) Heel (deg) (ballast) Draft (m) (full) Trim (deg) (full) Heel (deg) (full) 5-5 Ship Type Cargo Fishing boat PCC Tanker Solution No. drift speed (kt) drift direction (deg) head direction (deg) Initial Damage 1 1 Damage Damage 3 3 Damage 4 4 condition Fig.4-17 Change of ship status on upright full loaded condition (/3 fore part). Fig (Fig. 4-18) m/sec m7sec PCC ( )4 Table 4- ~
112 Tank15, wind only drift speed(kt) wave 3 period: 7.s height:.m incident angle: deg wind 6 speed: 1.m/s incident angle: deg 9 Tank15, wind and waves drift speed(kt) wave 3 period: 7.s height:.m incident angle: deg wind 6 speed: 1.m/s incident angle: deg 9 4 Cargo1, wind only drift speed(kt) Fish, wind only drift speed(kt) PCC99, wind only drift speed(kt) drift direction(deg) wave 33 3 period: 7.s height:.m incident angle: deg wind 6 speed: 1.m/s incident angle: deg 9 1 drift 1 15 direction(deg) 18 wave 33 3 period: 7.s height:.m incident angle: deg wind 6 speed: 1.m/s incident angle: deg 9 1 drift 1 15 direction(deg) 18 wave 33 3 period: 7.s height:.m incident angle: deg wind 6 speed: 1.m/s incident angle: deg drift direction(deg) Cargo1, wind and waves drift speed(kt) wave period: 7.s 5. height:.m 4. incident angle: deg 3. 3 wind 6. speed: 1.m/s 1. incident angle: deg drift 1 15 direction(deg) Fish,wind and waves 18 drift speed(kt) wave period: 7.s 3. height:.m.5 incident angle: deg wind 6 1. speed: 1.m/s.5 incident angle: deg drift 15 direction(deg) 18 drift speed(kt) wave period: 7.s 3. height:.m.5 incident angle: deg wind 6 1. speed: 1.m/s.5 incident angle: deg drift direction(deg) drift direction(deg) Fig Drift motion prediction of various type of ships in wind and waves. 11
113 Table 4-4 Submerged part of type ship status. Stern trim 3 Bow trim 3 Barge Cargo Container Fishing boat PCC Tanker (Double hull) Tanker1 (Single hull) Table 4-5 Submerged part of tanker and cargo. 6trim 3trim Even keel -3trim -6trim Cargo Tanker(Double hull) Table 4-6 Submerged part of broken tanker. Aft part -6. trim LOA = 176.6m Fore part 6. trim LOA = 88.3m All Even keel LOA = 65.m 9 ( ) Table 4-6 () Table 4-1 PCC 1.5 X w X Table 4-3 w Fx = (5) 1 1.4~. ρglha ρ g L h a (1) 8) Newman 9) 3 Table ( ) ±3 ( + )3 ( ) ±3 ±6 5 ( ) ±6 Table 4-4 Table
114 surge even keel 18deg.6 even keel 18deg.4 barge cargo.4.3 container fishing boat barge cargo. container fishing boat PCC tanker. PCC tanker.1 tanker1 tanker pitch?/l even keel 18deg ?/L barge container PCC tanker1 cargo fishing boat tanker heave Fx?/L barge container PCC tanker1?/l cargo fishing boat tanker even keel 18deg Fig Effect of ship type on RAO of ship motion and wave drift force (even keel, head wave) surge.9 heave even keel.6.6 even keel deg.5.5 deg.4.4 barge cargo barge cargo.3.3 container fishing boat container fishing boat.. PCC tanker PCC tanker.1.1 tanker1 tanker ?/L?/L pitch even keel deg ?/L barge container PCC tanker1 cargo fishing boat tanker Fx barge container PCC tanker1 even keel deg ?/L cargo fishing boat tanker Fig. 4- Effect of ship type on RAO of ship motion and wave drift force (even keel, follow wave). 114
115 surge -3. trim 18deg pitch barge container PCC tanker1 λ/l cargo fishing boat tanker barge container PCC tanker1 cargo fishing boat tanker -3. trim 18deg λ/l heave barge container PCC tanker1 cargo fishing boat tanker -3. trim 18deg λ/l Fx barge container PCC tanker1 λ/l cargo fishing boat tanker -3. trim 18deg Fig. 4-1 Effect of ship type on RAO of ship motion and wave drift force (bow trim, head wave) surge barge cargo container fishing boat PCC tanker tanker1-3. trim deg pitch barge container PCC tanker1 λ/l cargo fishing boat tanker -3. trim deg λ/l heave barge container PCC tanker1 cargo fishing boat tanker -3. trim deg λ/l Fx barge cargo container fishing boat PCC tanker tanker1-3. trim deg λ/l Fig. 4- Effect of ship type on RAO of ship motion and wave drift force (bow trim, follow wave). 115
116 surge barge container PCC tanker1 cargo fishing boat tanker 3. trim 18deg pitch barge container PCC tanker1 λ/l cargo fishing boat tanker 3. trim 18deg λ/l heave barge container PCC tanker1 cargo fishing boat tanker 3. trim 18deg λ/l Fx barge container PCC tanker1 cargo fishing boat tanker λ/l 3. trim 18deg Fig. 4-3 Effect of ship type on RAO of ship motion and wave drift force (stern trim, head wave) surge barge cargo 3.5 barge cargo 3.5 container fishing boat container fishing boat 3. PCC tanker PCC tanker 3. tanker1.5 tanker trim 3. trim.. deg deg pitch barge container PCC tanker1 λ/l cargo fishing boat tanker 3. trim deg λ/l heave Fx barge container PCC tanker1 λ/l cargo fishing boat tanker 3. trim deg λ/l Fig. 4-4 Effect of ship type on RAO of ship motion and wave drift force (stern trim, follow wave). 116
117 surge 6 trim 3 trim even keel -3 trim -6 trim tanker 18deg pitch 6 trim 3 trim even keel -3 trim -6 trim λ/l tanker 18deg λ/l heave 6 trim 3 trim even keel -3 trim -6 trim tanker 18deg λ/l Fx λ/l tanker 18deg 6 trim 3 trim even keel -3 trim -6 trim Fig. 4-5 Effect of ship status on RAO of ship motion and wave drift force (Tanker(double hull)) surge 6 trim 3 trim even keel -3 trim -6 trim cargo1 18deg /L pitch 6 trim 3 trim even keel -3 trim -6 trim cargo1 18deg /L heave 6 trim 3 trim even keel -3 trim -6 trim cargo1 18deg /L Fx /L cargo1 18deg 6 trim 3 trim even keel -3 trim -6 trim Fig. 4-6 Effect of ship status on RAO of ship motion and wave drift force (Cargo). 117
118 surge aft(-6. trim) fore(6. trim) all(even keel) 1.5 heave aft(-6. trim) fore(6. trim) all(even keel) Fig. 4-7 Effect of ship status of broken tanker on RAO of ship motion and wave drift force. 18 tanker broken 18deg pitch Fig Fig. 4- Table 4- Fig. 4-3 Fig λ/l=.5 1 Fig. 4-1 Fig. λ/l tanker broken 18deg λ/l aft(-6. trim) fore(6. trim) all(even keel) Table 4-7 Metacenter height and center of gravity. aft(-6. trim) fore(6. trim) all(even keel) GML OGX ( tanker broken 18deg ) Fig. 4-5 Fig. 4-6 ( 118 λ/l Fx λ/l aft(-6. trim) fore(6. trim) all(even keel) tanker broken 18deg λ/l.5 ( )
119 ) ( ) λ/l=1. 6 λ/l=1.5 Fig. 4-7 ( ) 1/3 3 6 Table 4-7 (GML) (OGX) ) Fig. 4-8 Towing operation concept using internet for making emergency towing database. ( -3kt 5-6kt () (3) (4) 1 (5) (6) 119
120 3) ( ) () pp ) 3D-WEB 871 (3)pp ()pp ) 191 () pp ) () pp ) Maruo, H.The Drift of a Body Floating on 9) Newman, J.N. The Drift Force and Moment on Ships in Waves, Journal of Ship Research, Vol.11, No.1, (1967) pp ) 31 3 (1994)pp (Fig. 4-8) 1) ( ) 74 ()pp37-38 ) ( 1 )1 (1)pp ) Waves, Journal of Ship Research, Vol.4, No.3, (196)pp.1-1 1
121 11
122 1) 11) 13
123 Fig.1 Wire rope construction 4) 1 6 Fig.1 point contact lay Fig. Point contact lay 4) Fig. Fig.3 Fig.3 Linear contact lay 4) (IWSC: Independent Wire Strand Core ) IWRC: Independent Wire Rope CoreCFRC: Center Fit Wire Rope Core Table 1 Classification of breaking load 4) (Fig.4) Fig.4 Section of core ropes 4) Table Symbol of lay 4) JIS 355 Table 1 Z S 14
124 Z S (Table ) ( ) 637 G/O IWRC 6 WS(36) G/O G/O Table Z IWRC 6WS(36) 77 IWRC: Independent Wire Rope Core WSWorinton Seal 6 D/d=1 Fig. 5 Appearance of synthetic 637 IWRC 6 fiber ropes 5) WS(36) Table 3 Table 4 4 Fig.5 1) 3 ) 4Z S (-4-1) 3) 1 6Z OCIMF S D/d> ) IWRC 6(37) D/d=16 6 WS(36)D/d= 1) 4) Table 5 Z S Z S Z 1 JIS 15
17_19
19 横傾斜状態で航行する船の流体力微係数と操縦性 * 正会員 安 川宏紀 正会員 平 田法隆 * Maneuverability and Hydrodynamic Derivatives of Ships Traveling in Heeled Condition by Hironori Yasukawa, Member Noritaka Hirata, Member Summary Oblique
More informationFig. 1 KAMOME50-2 Table 1 Principal dimensions Fig.2 Configuration of the hydrofoils (Endurance and sprint foil) Fig. 3 Schematic view of the vortex l
A study on the simulation of the motion of personal full-submerged hydrofoil craft by Yutaka Terao, Member Summary A new energy utilization project developed by Tokai University was started in 1991. It
More informationFig. 3 Coordinate system and notation Fig. 1 The hydrodynamic force and wave measured system Fig. 2 Apparatus of model testing
The Hydrodynamic Force Acting on the Ship in a Following Sea (1 St Report) Summary by Yutaka Terao, Member Broaching phenomena are most likely to occur in a following sea to relative small and fast craft
More informationManoeuvring Performance of the Fishing Boat Modified by a Bulge by Yasuo Yoshimura, Member Shiro Suzuki Ning Ma, Member Yoshiyuki Kajiwara Summary Fis
Manoeuvring Performance of the Fishing Boat Modified by a Bulge by Yasuo Yoshimura, Member Shiro Suzuki Ning Ma, Member Yoshiyuki Kajiwara Summary Fishing boats suffer from much capsizing as compared with
More informationm 50m 4,380 ton 80m 2 110kW The Offshore Floating Type Wave Power Device "Mighty Whale" Open Sea Tests; Part1 : An overvie
10 9 10 30m 50m 4,380 ton 80m 2 110kW 50 10 5 6 18 7 13 The Offshore Floating Type Wave Power Device "Mighty Whale" Open Sea Tests; Part1 : An overview of the experimental system and the mooring operations
More information第62巻 第1号 平成24年4月/石こうを用いた木材ペレット
Bulletin of Japan Association for Fire Science and Engineering Vol. 62. No. 1 (2012) Development of Two-Dimensional Simple Simulation Model and Evaluation of Discharge Ability for Water Discharge of Firefighting
More informationThe Evaluation on Impact Strength of Structural Elements by Means of Drop Weight Test Elastic Response and Elastic Limit by Hiroshi Maenaka, Member Sh
The Evaluation on Impact Strength of Structural Elements by Means of Drop Weight Test Elastic Response and Elastic Limit by Hiroshi Maenaka, Member Shigeru Kitamura, Member Masaaki Sakuma Genya Aoki, Member
More information原稿.indd
OTEC 18(2013),5968 小型の波浪発電を想定した浮体運動の最大化を目的とした浮体形状に関する研究 59 *1 *1 *2 Studies on the floating body shape to maximize the kinetic energy that are intended to be small wave power generator Shunya NISHIZAWA
More informationEstimation of Photovoltaic Module Temperature Rise Motonobu Yukawa, Member, Masahisa Asaoka, Non-member (Mitsubishi Electric Corp.) Keigi Takahara, Me
Estimation of Photovoltaic Module Temperature Rise Motonobu Yukawa, Member, Masahisa Asaoka, Non-member (Mitsubishi Electric Corp.) Keigi Takahara, Member (Okinawa Electric Power Co.,Inc.) Toshimitsu Ohshiro,
More information技術研究報告第26号
1) 2) 3) 250Hz 500Hz RESEARCH ON THE PHYSICAL VOLUME OF THE DYNAMIC VIBRATION RESPONSE AND THE REDUCTION OF THE FLOOR IMPACT SOUND LEVEL IN FLOORS OF RESIDENTIAL HOUSING Hideo WATANABE *1 This study was
More informationStudy on Application of the cos a Method to Neutron Stress Measurement Toshihiko SASAKI*3 and Yukio HIROSE Department of Materials Science and Enginee
Study on Application of the cos a Method to Neutron Stress Measurement Toshihiko SASAKI*3 and Yukio HIROSE Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kanazawa University, Kakuma-machi, Kanazawa-shi,
More informationJFE.dvi
,, Department of Civil Engineering, Chuo University Kasuga 1-13-27, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112 8551, JAPAN E-mail : atsu1005@kc.chuo-u.ac.jp E-mail : kawa@civil.chuo-u.ac.jp SATO KOGYO CO., LTD. 12-20, Nihonbashi-Honcho
More information28 Horizontal angle correction using straight line detection in an equirectangular image
28 Horizontal angle correction using straight line detection in an equirectangular image 1170283 2017 3 1 2 i Abstract Horizontal angle correction using straight line detection in an equirectangular image
More information1. ( ) 1.1 t + t [m]{ü(t + t)} + [c]{ u(t + t)} + [k]{u(t + t)} = {f(t + t)} (1) m ü f c u k u 1.2 Newmark β (1) (2) ( [m] + t ) 2 [c] + β( t)2
212 1 6 1. (212.8.14) 1 1.1............................................. 1 1.2 Newmark β....................... 1 1.3.................................... 2 1.4 (212.8.19)..................................
More informationNote.tex 2008/09/19( )
1 20 9 19 2 1 5 1.1........................ 5 1.2............................. 8 2 9 2.1............................. 9 2.2.............................. 10 3 13 3.1.............................. 13 3.2..................................
More information(1.2) T D = 0 T = D = 30 kn 1.2 (1.4) 2F W = 0 F = W/2 = 300 kn/2 = 150 kn 1.3 (1.9) R = W 1 + W 2 = = 1100 N. (1.9) W 2 b W 1 a = 0
1 1 1.1 1.) T D = T = D = kn 1. 1.4) F W = F = W/ = kn/ = 15 kn 1. 1.9) R = W 1 + W = 6 + 5 = 11 N. 1.9) W b W 1 a = a = W /W 1 )b = 5/6) = 5 cm 1.4 AB AC P 1, P x, y x, y y x 1.4.) P sin 6 + P 1 sin 45
More informationFig. 3 Flow diagram of image processing. Black rectangle in the photo indicates the processing area (128 x 32 pixels).
Fig. 1 The scheme of glottal area as a function of time Fig. 3 Flow diagram of image processing. Black rectangle in the photo indicates the processing area (128 x 32 pixels). Fig, 4 Parametric representation
More informationStudy of the "Vortex of Naruto" through multilevel remote sensing. Abstract Hydrodynamic characteristics of the "Vortex of Naruto" were investigated b
Study of the "Vortex of Naruto" through multilevel remote sensing. Abstract Hydrodynamic characteristics of the "Vortex of Naruto" were investigated based on the remotely sensed data. Small scale vortices
More informationchap03.dvi
99 3 (Coriolis) cm m (free surface wave) 3.1 Φ 2.5 (2.25) Φ 100 3 r =(x, y, z) x y z F (x, y, z, t) =0 ( DF ) Dt = t + Φ F =0 onf =0. (3.1) n = F/ F (3.1) F n Φ = Φ n = 1 F F t Vn on F = 0 (3.2) Φ (3.1)
More information14 FEM [1] 1992 [3] 1(a)(b) 1(c) [2] 2 ( 財 ) 日本海事協会 36 平成 14 年度 ClassNK 研究発表会
1. 1(1) 1(2)[1] 1992 [2] 1992 [3] 100 100 比率 (%) 80 60 40 変形腐食亀裂 相対損傷数 80 60 40 変形腐食亀裂 20 20 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 船齢 ( 年 ) 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 船齢 ( 年 ) (1) Ratio of Each Damage (2) Number of Damage Fig.1 Relation
More informationレーザ誘起蛍光法( LIF法) によるピストンの油膜挙動の解析
Analysis of Piston Oil Film Behavior by Using Laser Induced Fluorescence Method Shuzou Sanda, Akinori Saito ( Laser Induced Fluorescence Method LIF ) LIF Scanning -LIF Abstract Analysis of the oil film
More informationI
I 6 4 10 1 1 1.1............... 1 1................ 1 1.3.................... 1.4............... 1.4.1.............. 1.4................. 1.4.3........... 3 1.4.4.. 3 1.5.......... 3 1.5.1..............
More information最新耐震構造解析 ( 第 3 版 ) サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. このサンプルページの内容は, 第 3 版 1 刷発行時のものです.
最新耐震構造解析 ( 第 3 版 ) サンプルページ この本の定価 判型などは, 以下の URL からご覧いただけます. http://www.morikita.co.jp/books/mid/052093 このサンプルページの内容は, 第 3 版 1 刷発行時のものです. i 3 10 3 2000 2007 26 8 2 SI SI 20 1996 2000 SI 15 3 ii 1 56 6
More information塗装深み感の要因解析
17 Analysis of Factors for Paint Depth Feeling Takashi Wada, Mikiko Kawasumi, Taka-aki Suzuki ( ) ( ) ( ) The appearance and quality of objects are controlled by paint coatings on the surfaces of the objects.
More information() [REQ] 0m 0 m/s () [REQ] (3) [POS] 4.3(3) ()() () ) m/s 4. ) 4. AMEDAS
() [REQ] 4. 4. () [REQ] 0m 0 m/s () [REQ] (3) [POS] 4.3(3) ()() () 0 0 4. 5050 0 ) 00 4 30354045m/s 4. ) 4. AMEDAS ) 4. 0 3 ) 4. 0 4. 4 4.3(3) () [REQ] () [REQ] (3) [POS] () ()() 4.3 P = ρ d AnC DG ()
More informationJournal of Textile Engineering, Vol.53, No.5, pp
ORIGINAL PAPER Journal of Textile Engineering (2007), Vol.53, No.5, 203-210 2007 The Textile Machinery Society of Japan Analyzing the Path and the Tension of a Yarn under a False-twist Process Using a
More information211 kotaro@math.titech.ac.jp 1 R *1 n n R n *2 R n = {(x 1,..., x n ) x 1,..., x n R}. R R 2 R 3 R n R n R n D D R n *3 ) (x 1,..., x n ) f(x 1,..., x n ) f D *4 n 2 n = 1 ( ) 1 f D R n f : D R 1.1. (x,
More informationAbstract. A Device for the Simultaneous Recording of the Turning Circle, the Speed, etc. in the Turning Trial of a Ship. By S. Nitta. The author introduced a convenient arrangement of recording apparatus
More informationuntitled
SPring-8 RFgun JASRI/SPring-8 6..7 Contents.. 3.. 5. 6. 7. 8. . 3 cavity γ E A = er 3 πε γ vb r B = v E c r c A B A ( ) F = e E + v B A A A A B dp e( v B+ E) = = m d dt dt ( γ v) dv e ( ) dt v B E v E
More informationmt_4.dvi
( ) 2006 1 PI 1 1 1.1................................. 1 1.2................................... 1 2 2 2.1...................................... 2 2.1.1.......................... 2 2.1.2..............................
More information数学の基礎訓練I
I 9 6 13 1 1 1.1............... 1 1................ 1 1.3.................... 1.4............... 1.4.1.............. 1.4................. 3 1.4.3........... 3 1.4.4.. 3 1.5.......... 3 1.5.1..............
More information5 11 3 1....1 2. 5...4 (1)...5...6...7...17...22 (2)...70...71...72...77...82 (3)...85...86...87...92...97 (4)...101...102...103...112...117 (5)...121...122...123...125...128 1. 10 Web Web WG 5 4 5 ²
More informationFig. 1 Schematic construction of a PWS vehicle Fig. 2 Main power circuit of an inverter system for two motors drive
An Application of Multiple Induction Motor Control with a Single Inverter to an Unmanned Vehicle Propulsion Akira KUMAMOTO* and Yoshihisa HIRANE* This paper is concerned with a new scheme of independent
More information258 5) GPS 1 GPS 6) GPS DP 7) 8) 10) GPS GPS 2 3 4 5 2. 2.1 3 1) GPS Global Positioning System
Vol. 52 No. 1 257 268 (Jan. 2011) 1 2, 1 1 measurement. In this paper, a dynamic road map making system is proposed. The proposition system uses probe-cars which has an in-vehicle camera and a GPS receiver.
More information24 Depth scaling of binocular stereopsis by observer s own movements
24 Depth scaling of binocular stereopsis by observer s own movements 1130313 2013 3 1 3D 3D 3D 2 2 i Abstract Depth scaling of binocular stereopsis by observer s own movements It will become more usual
More informationStudy on Throw Accuracy for Baseball Pitching Machine with Roller (Study of Seam of Ball and Roller) Shinobu SAKAI*5, Juhachi ODA, Kengo KAWATA and Yu
Study on Throw Accuracy for Baseball Pitching Machine with Roller (Study of Seam of Ball and Roller) Shinobu SAKAI*5, Juhachi ODA, Kengo KAWATA and Yuichiro KITAGAWA Department of Human and Mechanical
More information国土技術政策総合研究所 研究資料
ISSN TECHNICAL NOTE of National Institute for Land and Infrastructure Management No256 September 2005 Experimental Study on Seismic Behavior of Seawalls for Controlled Waste Disposal Shingo KANO, Katsuya
More information空気の屈折率変調を光学的に検出する超指向性マイクロホン
23 2 1M36268 2 2 4 5 6 7 8 13 15 2 21 2 23 2 2 3 32 34 38 38 54 57 62 63 1-1 ( 1) ( 2) 1-1 a ( sinθ ) 2J D ( θ ) = 1 (1-1) kaka sinθ ( 3) 1-2 1 Back face hole Amplifier Diaphragm Equiphase wave surface
More informationmain.dvi
A 1/4 1 1/ 1/1 1 9 6 (Vergence) (Convergence) (Divergence) ( ) ( ) 97 1) S. Fukushima, M. Takahashi, and H. Yoshikawa: A STUDY ON VR-BASED MUTUAL ADAPTIVE CAI SYSTEM FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, Proc. of FIFTH
More information14 2 5
14 2 5 i ii Surface Reconstruction from Point Cloud of Human Body in Arbitrary Postures Isao MORO Abstract We propose a method for surface reconstruction from point cloud of human body in arbitrary postures.
More information振動と波動
Report JS0.5 J Simplicity February 4, 2012 1 J Simplicity HOME http://www.jsimplicity.com/ Preface 2 Report 2 Contents I 5 1 6 1.1..................................... 6 1.2 1 1:................ 7 1.3
More informationI, II 1, A = A 4 : 6 = max{ A, } A A 10 10%
1 2006.4.17. A 3-312 tel: 092-726-4774, e-mail: hara@math.kyushu-u.ac.jp, http://www.math.kyushu-u.ac.jp/ hara/lectures/lectures-j.html Office hours: B A I ɛ-δ ɛ-δ 1. 2. A 1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 2. ɛ-δ 1. ɛ-n
More informationThe Evaluation of LBB Behavior and Crack Opening Displacement on Statically Indeterminate Piping System Subjected to Monotonic Load The plastic collap
The Evaluation of LBB Behavior and Crack Opening Displacement on Statically Indeterminate Piping System Subjected to Monotonic Load The plastic collapse and LBB behavior of statically indeterminate piping
More information1. 4cm 16 cm 4cm 20cm 18 cm L λ(x)=ax [kg/m] A x 4cm A 4cm 12 cm h h Y 0 a G 0.38h a b x r(x) x y = 1 h 0.38h G b h X x r(x) 1 S(x) = πr(x) 2 a,b, h,π
. 4cm 6 cm 4cm cm 8 cm λ()=a [kg/m] A 4cm A 4cm cm h h Y a G.38h a b () y = h.38h G b h X () S() = π() a,b, h,π V = ρ M = ρv G = M h S() 3 d a,b, h 4 G = 5 h a b a b = 6 ω() s v m θ() m v () θ() ω() dθ()
More information64 3 g=9.85 m/s 2 g=9.791 m/s 2 36, km ( ) 1 () 2 () m/s : : a) b) kg/m kg/m k
63 3 Section 3.1 g 3.1 3.1: : 64 3 g=9.85 m/s 2 g=9.791 m/s 2 36, km ( ) 1 () 2 () 3 9.8 m/s 2 3.2 3.2: : a) b) 5 15 4 1 1. 1 3 14. 1 3 kg/m 3 2 3.3 1 3 5.8 1 3 kg/m 3 3 2.65 1 3 kg/m 3 4 6 m 3.1. 65 5
More information& Vol.5 No (Oct. 2015) TV 1,2,a) , Augmented TV TV AR Augmented Reality 3DCG TV Estimation of TV Screen Position and Ro
TV 1,2,a) 1 2 2015 1 26, 2015 5 21 Augmented TV TV AR Augmented Reality 3DCG TV Estimation of TV Screen Position and Rotation Using Mobile Device Hiroyuki Kawakita 1,2,a) Toshio Nakagawa 1 Makoto Sato
More information1 Fig. 1 Extraction of motion,.,,, 4,,, 3., 1, 2. 2.,. CHLAC,. 2.1,. (256 ).,., CHLAC. CHLAC, HLAC. 2.3 (HLAC ) r,.,. HLAC. N. 2 HLAC Fig. 2
CHLAC 1 2 3 3,. (CHLAC), 1).,.,, CHLAC,.,. Suspicious Behavior Detection based on CHLAC Method Hideaki Imanishi, 1 Toyohiro Hayashi, 2 Shuichi Enokida 3 and Toshiaki Ejima 3 We have proposed a method for
More information206“ƒŁ\”ƒ-fl_“H„¤‰ZŁñ
51 206 51 63 2007 GIS 51 1 60 52 2 60 1 52 3 61 2 52 61 3 58 61 4 58 Summary 63 60 20022005 2004 40km 7,10025 2002 2005 19 3 19 GIS 2005GIS 2006 2002 2004 GIS 52 2062007 1 2004 GIS Fig.1 GIS ESRIArcView
More informationClassic HD:ŠŸŠp”Ò:Discovery:‘‚ŠÞ:‚²„¤:Ÿ_Ł¶:Simulation_for_HRO.dvi
HRO 52 2002 7 19 HRO (Ham Radio Observation) HRO HRO 1 2 100km Microsoft Excel HRO 1999 12 12 16 HRO HRO 1 2 1.1........................................... 2 1.2 HRO............................ 2 1.3 HRO...................................
More information日立金属技報 Vol.34
Influence of Misorientation Angle between Adjacent Grains on Magnetization Reversal in Nd-Fe-B Sintered Magnet Tomohito Maki Rintaro Ishii Mitsutoshi Natsumeda Takeshi Nishiuchi Ryo Uchikoshi Masaaki Takezawa
More informationPart () () Γ Part ,
Contents a 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 7. 8.. 8.. 8.3. 8 Part. 9. 9.. 9.. 3. 3.. 3.. 3 4. 5 4.. 5 4.. 9 4.3. 3 Part. 6 5. () 6 5.. () 7 5.. 9 5.3. Γ 3 6. 3 6.. 3 6.. 3 6.3. 33 Part 3. 34 7. 34 7.. 34 7.. 34 8. 35
More information実船における YP4 鋼の使用状況とその実績評価 Application ratio of high tensile steels (w%) Ratio of each type of steel (w%) R & D for TMCP Technology R & D for TMCP Steel
YP4 1. TMCP YP4 1 2 YP4 2 YP4 YP4 NK 1 NK 2. 2.1 TMCP TMCP 198 HT TMCP Fig.1 TMCP HT 197 YP32 HT 2% TMCP YP32/36 198 7% 2 2% TMCP YP4 4kgf/mm 2 198 12 13 8. 1 ( 財 ) 日本海事協会 49 平成 13 年度 ClassNK 研究発表会 実船における
More informationIsogai, T., Building a dynamic correlation network for fat-tailed financial asset returns, Applied Network Science (7):-24, 206,
H28. (TMU) 206 8 29 / 34 2 3 4 5 6 Isogai, T., Building a dynamic correlation network for fat-tailed financial asset returns, Applied Network Science (7):-24, 206, http://link.springer.com/article/0.007/s409-06-0008-x
More informationFig. 1. Horizontal displacement of the second and third order triangulation points accompanied with the Tottori Earthquake of (after SATO, 1973)
Journal of the Geodetic Society of Japan Vol. 27, No. 3, (1981), pp. 183-191 Research on Fault Movement by means of Aero-Triangulation ( T) (An experiment on the earthquake fault of the Izu-Oshima Kinkai
More informationIHIMU Energy-Saving Principle of the IHIMU Semicircular Duct and Its Application to the Flow Field Around Full Scale Ships IHI GHG IHIMU CFD PIV IHI M
IHIMU Energy-Saving Principle of the IHIMU Semicircular Duct and Its Application to the Flow Field Around Full Scale Ships IHI GHG IHIMU PIV IHI Marine United Inc. ( IHIMU ) has already developed several
More informationJ. Jpn. Inst. Light Met. 65(6): 224-228 (2015)
65 62015 224 228 ** Journal of The Japan Institute of Light Metals, Vol. 65, No. 6 (2015), 224 228 2015 The Japan Institute of Light Metals Investigation of heat flow behavior on die-casting core pin with
More informationS-6.indd
Structural Health Monitoring with Fiber Optic Deformation Sensor ( SOFO ) SOFO SOFO ( SOFO V ) ( SOFO Dynamic ) 2 SOFO The fiber optic deformation sensor, SOFO, has excellent characteristics such as ease
More informationuntitled
1 2 3 4 5 130mm 32mm UV-irradiation UV-cationic cure UV-cationic cure UV-cationic cure Thermal cationic Reaction heat cure Thermal cationic Cation Reaction heat cure Cation (a) UV-curing of
More informationxx/xx Vol. Jxx A No. xx 1 Fig. 1 PAL(Panoramic Annular Lens) PAL(Panoramic Annular Lens) PAL (2) PAL PAL 2 PAL 3 2 PAL 1 PAL 3 PAL PAL 2. 1 PAL
PAL On the Precision of 3D Measurement by Stereo PAL Images Hiroyuki HASE,HirofumiKAWAI,FrankEKPAR, Masaaki YONEDA,andJien KATO PAL 3 PAL Panoramic Annular Lens 1985 Greguss PAL 1 PAL PAL 2 3 2 PAL DP
More informationuntitled
2M5-24 SM311 SM332 3 4 e30mm 5 e30mm [2M5-24] 0-5 -10-15 -20-150-125-100-75-50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 0-5 -10-15 -20-150-125-100-75-50 -25 0 25 50 75 100 125 150 0-5 -10-15 -20-150-125-100-75-50 -25
More information.I.v e pmd
Structural Design for Curved Panels by Laminated Composite Materials (Identification of Lamination Parameters Using Modal Testing Method ) Tetsuya NARISAWA, Shohei IWATA Abstract - Using a modal testing
More information1 158 14 2 8 00225 2 1.... 3 1.1... 4 1.2... 5 2.... 6 2.1...7 2.2... 8 3.... 9 3.1... 10 3.2... 16 4.... 17 4.1... 18 4.2... 20 4.3... 22 5.... 23 5.1... 24 5.2... 28 5.3... 34 5.4... 37 5.5... 39 6....
More informationTable 1 Experimental conditions Fig. 1 Belt sanded surface model Table 2 Factor loadings of final varimax criterion 5 6
JSPE-54-04 Factor Analysis of Relationhsip between One's Visual Estimation and Three Dimensional Surface Roughness Properties on Belt Sanded Surface Motoyoshi HASEGAWA and Masatoshi SHIRAYAMA This paper
More information食品工学.indb
, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 51-58, Mar. 2010 IH The Visualization and Quantification of the Flow in the Pan During Induction Heating and Gas Heating Haruna KAWAKAMI, Zensyu TOU, Mika FUKUOKA, and Noboru SAKAI
More informationuntitled
JIS A 12190000 Method for standard penetration test 2005 1 ISO 22476-3:2005 J J 1 SPTSPT 63.5 kg 760 mm SPT N SPT 300 mm N A 2 ISO 22475-1,Geotechnical investigation and testing Sampling methods and groundwater
More information75 unit: mm Fig. Structure of model three-phase stacked transformer cores (a) Alternate-lap joint (b) Step-lap joint 3 4)
3 * 35 (3), 7 Analysis of Local Magnetic Properties and Acoustic Noise in Three-Phase Stacked Transformer Core Model Masayoshi Ishida Kenichi Sadahiro Seiji Okabe 3.7 T 5 Hz..4 3 Synopsis: Methods of local
More information電子部品はんだ接合部の熱疲労寿命解析
43 Evaluation for Thermal Fatigue Life of Solder Joints in Electronic Components Haruhiko Yamada, Kazuyoshi Ogawa 2 63Sn- 37Pb 95Pb-5Sn Si Cu Si 63Sn-37Pb Since automotive electronic components are used
More informationOptical Lenses CCD Camera Laser Sheet Wind Turbine with med Diffuser Pitot Tube PC Fig.1 Experimental facility. Transparent Diffuser Double Pulsed Nd:
*1 *2 *3 PIV Measurement of Field of the Wind Turbine with a med Diffuser Kazuhiko TOSHIMITSU *4, Koutarou NISHIKAWA and Yuji OHYA *4 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Matsue National Collage of Technology,
More informationMikio Yamamoto: Dynamical Measurement of the E-effect in Iron-Cobalt Alloys. The AE-effect (change in Young's modulus of elasticity with magnetization
Mikio Yamamoto: Dynamical Measurement of the E-effect in Iron-Cobalt Alloys. The AE-effect (change in Young's modulus of elasticity with magnetization) in the annealed state of iron-cobalt alloys has been
More informationSafety Performance of Steel Deck Plate (Flat Decks) Used for Concrete Slab Moulding CONTENTS 1. Introduction ---------------------------------------------------------------- (2) 2. Flat Decks ------------------------------------------------------------------
More informationFig. 4. Configuration of fatigue test specimen. Table I. Mechanical property of test materials. Table II. Full scale fatigue test conditions and test
(J. Soc. Mat. Sci., Japan), Vol. 52, No. 11, pp. 1351-1356, Nov. 2003 Fatigue Life Prediction of Coiled Tubing by Takanori KATO*, Miyuki YAMAMOTO*, Isao SAWAGUCHI** and Tetsuo YONEZAWA*** Coiled tubings,
More informationDecember 28, 2018
e-mail : kigami@i.kyoto-u.ac.jp December 28, 28 Contents 2............................. 3.2......................... 7.3..................... 9.4................ 4.5............. 2.6.... 22 2 36 2..........................
More informationSpacecraft Propulsion Using Solar Energy Spacecraft with Magnetic Field Light from the Sun Solar Wind Thrust Mirror Solar Sail Thrust production by li
2004.3.28 物理学会シンポジウム 磁気プラズマセイル の可能性と 深宇宙探査への挑戦 宇宙航空研究開発機構 船木一幸 Spacecraft Propulsion Using Solar Energy Spacecraft with Magnetic Field Light from the Sun Solar Wind Thrust Mirror Solar Sail Thrust production
More information013858,繊維学会誌ファイバー1月/報文-02-古金谷
Development of Non-Contact Measuring Method for Final Twist Number of Double Ply Staple Yarn Keizo Koganeya 1, Youichi Yukishita 1, Hirotaka Fujisaki 1, Yasunori Jintoku 2, Hironori Okuno 2, and Motoharu
More information1 (Berry,1975) 2-6 p (S πr 2 )p πr 2 p 2πRγ p p = 2γ R (2.5).1-1 : : : : ( ).2 α, β α, β () X S = X X α X β (.1) 1 2
2005 9/8-11 2 2.2 ( 2-5) γ ( ) γ cos θ 2πr πρhr 2 g h = 2γ cos θ ρgr (2.1) γ = ρgrh (2.2) 2 cos θ θ cos θ = 1 (2.2) γ = 1 ρgrh (2.) 2 2. p p ρgh p ( ) p p = p ρgh (2.) h p p = 2γ r 1 1 (Berry,1975) 2-6
More information鉄鋼協会プレゼン
NN :~:, 8 Nov., Adaptive H Control for Linear Slider with Friction Compensation positioning mechanism moving table stand manipulator Point to Point Control [G] Continuous Path Control ground Fig. Positoining
More informationQMI_10.dvi
25 3 19 Erwin Schrödinger 1925 3.1 3.1.1 σ τ x u u x t ux, t) u 3.1 t x P ux, t) Q θ P Q Δx x + Δx Q P ux + Δx, t) Q θ P u+δu x u x σ τ P x) Q x+δx) P Q x 3.1: θ P θ Q P Q equation of motion P τ Q τ σδx
More informationQMI_09.dvi
25 3 19 Erwin Schrödinger 1925 3.1 3.1.1 3.1.2 σ τ 2 2 ux, t) = ux, t) 3.1) 2 x2 ux, t) σ τ 2 u/ 2 m p E E = p2 3.2) E ν ω E = hν = hω. 3.3) k p k = p h. 3.4) 26 3 hω = E = p2 = h2 k 2 ψkx ωt) ψ 3.5) h
More information燃焼圧センサ
49 Combustion Pressure Sensor Kouji Tsukada, Masaharu Takeuchi, Sanae Tokumitsu, Yoshiteru Ohmura, Kazuyoshi Kawaguchi π 1000N 150 225N 1 F.S Abstract A new combustion pressure sensor capable of measuring
More informationFig. 2 Signal plane divided into cell of DWT Fig. 1 Schematic diagram for the monitoring system
Study of Health Monitoring of Vehicle Structure by Using Feature Extraction based on Discrete Wavelet Transform Akihisa TABATA *4, Yoshio AOKI, Kazutaka ANDO and Masataka KATO Department of Precision Machinery
More informationSICE東北支部研究集会資料(2012年)
77 (..3) 77- A study on disturbance compensation control of a wheeled inverted pendulum robot during arm manipulation using Extended State Observer Luis Canete Takuma Sato, Kenta Nagano,Luis Canete,Takayuki
More information,, 2. Matlab Simulink 2018 PC Matlab Scilab 2
(2018 ) ( -1) TA Email : ohki@i.kyoto-u.ac.jp, ske.ta@bode.amp.i.kyoto-u.ac.jp : 411 : 10 308 1 1 2 2 2.1............................................ 2 2.2..................................................
More informationFig. 1. Schematic drawing of testing system. 71 ( 1 )
1850 UDC 669.162.283 : 669.162.263.24/. 25 Testing Method of High Temperature Properties of Blast Furnace Burdens Yojiro YAMAOKA, Hirohisa HOTTA, and Shuji KAJIKAWA Synopsis : Regarding the reduction under
More information0801391,繊維学会ファイバ12月号/報文-01-西川
Pattern Making Method and Evaluation by Dots of Monochrome Shigekazu Nishikawa 1,MarikoYoshizumi 1,andHajime Miyake 2 1 Miyagi University of Education, 149, Aramaki-aza-Aoba, Aoba-ku, Sendai-shi, Miyagi
More informationI A A441 : April 15, 2013 Version : 1.1 I Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Shigehiro, Yoshida )
I013 00-1 : April 15, 013 Version : 1.1 I Kawahira, Tomoki TA (Shigehiro, Yoshida) http://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~kawahira/courses/13s-tenbou.html pdf * 4 15 4 5 13 e πi = 1 5 0 5 7 3 4 6 3 6 10 6 17
More information, (GPS: Global Positioning Systemg),.,, (LBS: Local Based Services).. GPS,.,. RFID LAN,.,.,.,,,.,..,.,.,,, i
25 Estimation scheme of indoor positioning using difference of times which chirp signals arrive 114348 214 3 6 , (GPS: Global Positioning Systemg),.,, (LBS: Local Based Services).. GPS,.,. RFID LAN,.,.,.,,,.,..,.,.,,,
More information放水の物理的火災抑制効果に着目した地域住民の消火活動モデル
A Model for Fire Fighting Activities of Community Residents Considering Physical Impacts of Fire Suppression of Water Application Keisuke HIMOTO*, Kenji IKUYO**, Yasuo AKIMOTO***, Akihiko HOKUGO****, Takeyoshi
More informationField Measurement of Aeolian Sand Flux over a Sand Dune Slope Junaidi Keiko UDO, Shota MITSUSHIO, JUNAIDI, Shin-ichi AOKI, Shigeru KATO and Akira MANO
Field Measurement of Aeolian Sand Flux over a Sand Dune Slope Junaidi Keiko UDO, Shota MITSUSHIO, JUNAIDI, Shin-ichi AOKI, Shigeru KATO and Akira MANO This study conducted field observations in terms of
More information/02/18
3 09/0/8 i III,,,, III,?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,?,?,,,,,,,,,,,,,,!!!,? 3,,,, ii,,,!,,,, OK! :!,,,, :!,,,,,, 3:!,, 4:!,,,, 5:!,,! 7:!,,,,, 8:!,! 9:!,,,,,,,,, ( ),, :, ( ), ( ), 6:!,,, :... : 3 ( )... iii,,
More information5b_08.dvi
, Circularly Polarized Patch Antennas Combining Different Shaped Linealy Polarized Elements Takanori NORO,, Yasuhiro KAZAMA, Masaharu TAKAHASHI, and Koichi ITO 1. GPS LAN 10% [1] Graduate School of Science
More information19 σ = P/A o σ B Maximum tensile strength σ % 0.2% proof stress σ EL Elastic limit Work hardening coefficient failure necking σ PL Proportional
19 σ = P/A o σ B Maximum tensile strength σ 0. 0.% 0.% proof stress σ EL Elastic limit Work hardening coefficient failure necking σ PL Proportional limit ε p = 0.% ε e = σ 0. /E plastic strain ε = ε e
More informationLAGUNA LAGUNA 8 p Saline wedge at River Gonokawa, Shimane Pref., Japan Saline water intrusion at estuary r
LAGUNA8 67 78 2001 3 LAGUNA 8 p.67 78 2001 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Saline wedge at River Gonokawa, Shimane Pref., Japan Saline water intrusion at estuary river and its relation to the underground water Observation
More information撮 影
DC cathode ray tube, 2.2 log log log + log log / / / A method determining tone conversion characteristics of digital still camera from two pictorial images Tone conversion characteristic Luminance
More informationK E N Z U 2012 7 16 HP M. 1 1 4 1.1 3.......................... 4 1.2................................... 4 1.2.1..................................... 4 1.2.2.................................... 5................................
More informationHAIN LBL/SSBL INS-DVL Kinematic GPS Positioning Acoustic Ranging Acoustic Transponder GPS Reference Stations Continental Plate Plate Boundary Oceanic Plate Trench Axis Long baseline kinematic GPS positioning
More informationMott散乱によるParity対称性の破れを検証
Mott Parity P2 Mott target Mott Parity Parity Γ = 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 t P P ),,, ( 3 2 1 0 1 γ γ γ γ γ γ ν ν µ µ = = Γ 1 : : : Γ P P P P x x P ν ν µ µ vector axial vector ν ν µ µ γ γ Γ ν γ
More informationudc-2.dvi
13 0.5 2 0.5 2 1 15 2001 16 2009 12 18 14 No.39, 2010 8 2009b 2009a Web Web Q&A 2006 2007a20082009 2007b200720082009 20072008 2009 2009 15 1 2 2 2.1 18 21 1 4 2 3 1(a) 1(b) 1(c) 1(d) 1) 18 16 17 21 10
More informationDevelopment of Induction and Exhaust Systems for Third-Era Honda Formula One Engines Induction and exhaust systems determine the amount of air intake
Development of Induction and Exhaust Systems for Third-Era Honda Formula One Engines Induction and exhaust systems determine the amount of air intake supplied to the engine, and as such are critical elements
More information磁気測定によるオーステンパ ダクタイル鋳鉄の残留オーステナイト定量
33 Non-destructive Measurement of Retained Austenite Content in Austempered Ductile Iron Yoshio Kato, Sen-ichi Yamada, Takayuki Kato, Takeshi Uno Austempered Ductile Iron (ADI) 100kg/mm 2 10 ADI 10 X ADI
More information