野村資本市場研究所｜国際基準との調和も踏まえた米国SIFI規制（PDF）
|
|
|
- こうしょ さだい
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SIFI 1. FRB FRB SIFI 500 FRB 2. SIFI FRB G-SIB 2016 LCR NSFR 3. SIFI 25 SIFI 10 2 SIFI 4. SIFI 83
2 2012 Winter FRB FRB SIFIFRB (a) interconnected 500 bank holding company FSOC FRB nonbank financial company FRB stringent (b) 500 FRB 3 FRB 165 (h) FRB risk committee 165 (i) 500 FRB 165 (j) 500 FRB debt-to-equity ratio early remediation requirement 500 FRB FRB Federal Reserve System, Enhanced Prudential Standards and Early Remediation Requirement for Covered Companies, Proposed Rule, 12 CFR Part252, Regulation YY; Docket No.1438, RIN7100-AD-86. FRB FSOC Federal Reserve System, 12 CFR Part 243, Regulation QQ; Docket No. R-1414, RIN 7100-AD73, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 12 CFR Part 381, RIN 3064 AD77, Resolution Plans Required, Final Rule, November 1,
3 FRB SIFI SIFI SIFI G-SIB FRB SIFI FRB G20 FRB G-SIB LCRNSFR SIFI FRB capital plan G-SIB LCR NSFR 4 Daniel Tarullo, Regulating Systemically Important Financial Firms, Remarks at the Peter G. Peterson Institute for International Economics, June 3,
4 2012 Winter 25 5,000 FRB 5,000 FRB 10 FRB FRB 500 FRB 4 SIFI SIFI FRB 500 FRB FRB foreign banking organization FRB FRB FRB (h) 165 (i)
5 FRB FRB (b)(1)(a)(i) FRB FRB 2 FRB Tier1 5 FRB G-SIB SIFI G-SIB 500 FRB TARP 19 SCAP 2009 FRB 2010 CCAR FRB FRB SR Federal Reserve System, Capital Plans, Final Rule, 12 CFR Part225, Regulation Y; Docket No.1425, RIN7100-AD
6 2012 Winter 2012 CCAR 30 FRB FRB FRB FRB 9 FRB 8 Tier1 4 Tier1 4 Tier1 5 9 FRB capital distribution 10 FRB FRB 1 SIFI FRB 165 (i) FRB FRB FRB FRB Tier1 4 8 Tier1 4 9 Tier1 Tier1 10 FRB 88
7 11 FRB 165 FRB G-SIB quantitative risk-based capital surcharge FRB G-SIB G-SIB 500 FRB FRB (b)(1)(a)(ii) FRB LCR 2018 NSFR 11 FRB G-SIB 89
8 2012 Winter (a) (b) (c) (d) CFP FRB liquidity risk tolerance 13 (a) (b) CFP (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) 13 90
9 CFP 14 CFP 14 ABCP 91
10 2012 Winter FRB unencumbered FRB LCR LCR LCR FRB FRB LCR 15 92
11 LCR GSE FRB (a) (b) (c) LCR 16 CFP 17 CFP CFP CFP CFP 18 CDS 93
12 2012 Winter FRB CFP 19 CFP (a)cfp (b) (c) (d) FRB CFP CFP CFP 20 94
13 2 165 (e) 25 FRB 25 FRB 2 general limit on aggregate net credit exposure FRB 25 major covered company limits on aggregate net credit exposure 5,000 FRB 5,000 FRB FRB 95
14 2012 Winter (e)(7) FRB capital stock and surplus Tier2 23 L/C FRB FRB FRB (a) (b) L/C (a) (i) 0 (ii) (b) 96
15 FRB GSE FRB FRB FRB FRB BIS IMF ECB FHLB FAMC SEC CCP (i) 165 (i)(1) adverse economic condition 97
16 2012 Winter FRB 165 (i)(2) 100 FRB supervisory stress test company-run stress test 2 FRB adverse severely adverse 3 FRB FRB 3 FRB FRB SCAP CCAR FRB FRB FRB 1 GDP 1 FRB 98
17 FRB FRB 9 FRB 9 30 FRB 25 FRB FRB FRB pre-provision net revenue FRB 25 FRB 99
18 2012 Winter FRB FRB FRB FRB FRB 3 31 FRB FRB 9 2 FRB
19 FRB 1 5 FRB 7 5 FRB FRB 90 GDP FRB SIFI FRB 101
20 2012 Winter 9 3 FRB FRB 1 FRB the requirements of any regulations adopted by the Board relating to capital plans and tests FRB 165 (i)(2) CCAR FRB CCAR FRB 3 FRB PCA 102
21 GAO 166 (a) (b) FRB FRB 1 FRB FRB FDIC FRB 103
22 2012 Winter 29 4 PCA Tier FRB 29 CDS 104
23 165 (j) FSOC FRB 15 1 FRB FSOC FRB (h) 100 FRB 100 FRB CRO CRO SIFI FRB FRB SIFI 105
24 2012 Winter G-SIB LCR NSFR FRB G20 SIFI Tier1 5 SIFI FRB SIFI LCR NSFR SIFI 10 SIFI SIFI 500 FRB FRB 106
25 FRB 500 FRB SR FRB 1 Tier1 Tier FRB (a) (b) (c) (d) FRB FRB (a) (b) (c) Tier1 5 FRB (a) (b) (c)frb FRB FRB (a) (b) (c) Tier1 5 (d) FRB FRB FRB FRB Tier1 5 FRB FRB 107
Microsoft Word - 査読SP問題110510RR.doc
JAVCERM Journal [] 2 # 2011_01_Ronko 2010 1 4 2011 5 12 1 2 2 1999 National Bank of Keystone(Keystone), Pacific Thrift and Loan(PLT) FDIC CAMEAL 20 20 1 11 6 2.2 2000 Greenspan FRB 2000 IT IT Greenspan[2004]
野村資本市場研究所｜ベイルインの導入に向けた検討－破綻時に債権の損失吸収を図る新たな措置－（PDF）
1. SIFI 2. EU 1 FDIC G20 FSB 3. 4. FSB 2012 8 G20 88 2012 6 EU EU bail-in 1 ICB 2 write-down SIFI SIFI SIFI bail-out SIFI G20 too big to fail 2010 6 G20 SIFI 1 3 2011 11 FSBG20 1 2 3 2012 ICB PLAC 2011
, 3, 1999, 4,,
1, 1992 2005,,, 10 2,, 1992 1998 1,,, 1998 2002 2,, 3,,, 2002, 2002 3 1 2 1 , 3, 1999, 4,, 3 14 11 2 I, 10,, 1992 2005, 2,, 3, 4,, II,, 1992 1998 1,, 1998 2002 2 2002 3 II-1: 1 1993 1998 90,, 1995 6850,,
国際流動性に関する財政的側面について
IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: [email protected] / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]
untitled
S C B SHINKIN CENTRAL BANK 103-0028 1-3-7 TEL.03-5202-7671 FAX.03-3278-7048 URL http://www.scbri.jp 20 1015 GDP 80 S&L OFHEOHPI 2007 79 0.4 1994 13 1975 2007 912 1995 1-3 100 OFHEO 1980 2000 GDP ( 5.9)
PDFŠpŒ{Ł¶
Shinkin Central Bank Monthly Review 2003.12 hinkin Central Bank Monthly Review 200312 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Community Banker 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36
会社法制上の資本制度の変容と企業会計上の資本概念について
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2006-J-1 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 30 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2006-J-1 2006 1
橡motonishi.PDF
2000 3 ITME Discussion Paper No.26 850-8506 4-2-1 [email protected] 1 1 MRF 1 (2000) 2 MRF 2 Schreft (1997) 3 2 Tobin (1985) Friedman (1992) 3 3 4 5 3 4 5 2 White (1984) 1 4 (1996) (1999) (1999)
取引法の観点からみた資金決済に関する諸問題
1 / /2010.1 105 1. 1 1 1 2008 5 2 2008 10 3 1 4 2007 8 1 2008 32 2 2008 5 12 2009 1 2009 2009 3 6 2008 12 2008 3 1842 32 4 2006 10 2009 4 2009 http://www.shojihomu.or.jp/saikenhou/indexja.html 2005 11
An Empirical Study of the Securities Firms' Dilemma on Financial Innovation through Diffusion of Internet Deals Yasugi Satoshi Bower, J. L., 1999, Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave,
非営利組織における純資産と負債の区分
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2009-J-11 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 2-1-1 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2009-J-11 2009
伝統的な経済学では、「消費は重要ではあるが、気にしなくてもよい」と考えられてきた
2005 1 2004 SARS 2003 IMF 2004 5.0 2004 4.1 0.9 30 2005 2004 2005 2005 2005 2004 2005 IMF 2005 4.3 2004 IMF 2004 2003 3.0 4.3 2003 2 2003 2004 IT 2005 IMF 2005 2004 3.5 IT 1995 10 2.8% 10 2 1 IT IT 2004
資金循環の日米欧比較
資 金 循 環 の 日 米 欧 比 較 2016 年 6 月 22 日 銀 行 調 査 統 計 局 * 本 資 料 では 日 米 欧 日 米 について 主 要 な 部 門 を 比 較 掲 載 しています Ⅰ. 日 米 欧 比 較 日 米 は2016 年 3 月 末 ユーロエリアは201 年 12 月 末 現 在 図 表 1 金 融 機 関 の 金 融 資 産 負 債 構 成 資 産 ( 3,236
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discuss ssion Paper No. 98-J-2 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discuss ssion Paper Series 98-J-2 1998 1 VaRVWAP E-mail: [email protected]
アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて
* ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East
S&P500 S&P500 Short S&P 500 Fund ProShares UltraShort S&P500 ProShares Ultra S&P500 ProShares Direxion ProShares S&P500 SPDR S&P 500 ETF Vanguard S&P
S&P500 S&P500 Short S&P 500 Fund ProShares UltraShort S&P500 ProShares Ultra S&P500 ProShares Direxion ProShares S&P500 SPDR S&P 500 ETF Vanguard S&P 500 ETF ishares S&P 500 ETF SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY)
米国における金融・資本市場改革の展開
1980 DIDMCA 1982 1994 20 & 1989 FIRREA 1991 FDICIA 1999 11 12 Gramm-Leach- Bliley Act P.L.106-102, 113 STAT.1338 1933 Glass-Steagall Act P.L. 73-66, 48 STAT. 162 66 1980 1981 1980 1990 & Savings and Loan
-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs
BIS FRB BIS BIS FRB QE QE -February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs GDP GDP........ GDP BIS, 83rd Annual Report, June 2013, p.14 Ibid., p.14. -February 1 1 2009 2013 2) 2009 2013 2) -7.6-4.0
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8660 30 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-45 199912 12 1986 General Agreement of Trade in Service Multilateral
条件付償還義務株式の会計処理について
E-mail: [email protected] ASBJ ASBJ FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards FAS FAS FAS mandatorily redeemable financial instruments nternational Financial Reporting Standards FASB DES
野村資本市場研究所｜ASEAN投資信託市場の現状と課題（PDF）
213 Spring ASEAN 1. 2. 5.7 ASEAN 3. 3.3 4. 2.4 5. ASEAN 76 1 ASEAN 213 ASEAN 4 ASEAN ASEAN 2 1 1 1 1 1 OECD The Emerging Middle Class in Developing Countries January 21 2 Cerulli Associates Asset Management
2016 2/23 No MOC MOC 60 MOC B.E (1) (2) (3) (4) FTA
2016 1/23 No 50 1 (1) (Foreign () Business Act) 8 JEITA 50 50 50 ( ) 2006 5 4049 8 15 concession license 2007 1 9 2007 4 10 MOC The Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 " foreign entity " 51 " """ 3 Telecom
untitled
PPP 1 2 PPP 2.1 PPP 4 PPP PPP 4 (1) PPP (2) (3) (4) 2.2 PPP PPP PPP 4 2-1 PPP Country Risk Related Laws & Regulations PPP Legal and Regulatory Framework Instit l Framework Instit l Strategic Planning Capacity
資金循環の日米欧比較
資金循環の日米欧比較 2018 年 8 月 14 日銀行調査統計局 * 本資料では 日 米 欧 日 米について 主要な部門を比較 掲載しています Ⅰ. 日米欧比較 データはいずれも 2018 年 3 月末現在 図表 1 金融機関の金融資産 負債構成 資産 ( 3,46 兆円 ) 負債 ( 3,30 兆円 ) 預金取扱機関 ( 1,939 兆円 ) 貸出 ( 1,903 兆円 ) 保険 年金基金 %
野村資本市場研究所｜米国の厳格なSIFI規制と規模に応じた銀行規制－銀行規制システムにおける階層アプローチ－（PDF）
米国の厳格な SIFI 規制と規模に応じた銀行規制 銀行規制システムにおける階層アプローチ 小立敬 要約 1. 米国では ドッド=フランク法の成立から5 年が経過しているが 同法の下で米国の金融規制システムの改革が続いている そうした中 米国ではトゥー ビッグ トゥ フェイル (TBTF) の終結を実現させることが金融規制 監督政策における最重要課題として強く意識されている 2. 米国の銀行規制システム改革では
topics_040
/ / SWF Sovereign Wealth Fund Ease of Doing Business 1.0 0.4 7.9 9.7 Bank of Canada [2015] Monetary Policy Report, January 2015. Bank of England [2015] Inflation Report, February 2015. BIS [2015]
Special Excise Tax Corporate Excise Tax Kohler 1925, p. 8 Kohler 1925, p. 8. American Institute of Accountants : AIA Federal Reserve Board : FRB Unifo
Black 1966, p. vii Special Excise Tax Corporate Excise Tax Kohler 1925, p. 8 Kohler 1925, p. 8. American Institute of Accountants : AIA Federal Reserve Board : FRB Uniform Accounting AIA 1917 Price Waterhouse
44-2 宮崎裕介.pwd
repurchase. . JPX JPX ROE Return on Equity: JPX JPX Available at: JPX Tokyo Stock Exchange: http:// www.tse.or.jp / market / topix / jpx_nikkei.html last visited 11 / 06 / 2014. JPX JPX ROE TOPIX ROE JPX
商品流動性リスクの計量化に関する一考察（その2）―内生的流動性リスクを考慮したストレス・テスト―
E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Bangia et al. G Bangia et al. exogenous liquidity risk endogenous liquidity risk et al LTCMLong Term Capital Management Fed G G T
FINANCIAL FACT BOOK 2002 CONTENTS CONTENTS Sales Data Net Sales Sales Composition Sales by Region Profit Data Cost Composition & Operating Income/Net
FINANCIAL FACT BOOK 2002 FINANCIAL FACT BOOK 2002 CONTENTS CONTENTS Sales Data Net Sales Sales Composition Sales by Region Profit Data Cost Composition & Operating Income/Net Sales Gross Profit Margin
本文／ＹＡＺ１７２Ｐ
2004 2005 2006 2007 Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of Treadway Commission COSO 1992 Internal Control-Integrated Framework COSO 1 1 COSO 2009 7 27 2009 9 11 21 1956 1980 1986 MBA 1980 2006 1990 1993
(1) 259 (2) 259 (3) (1) 260 (2) 261 (3) (1) 262 (2) 266 (3) 267 (4) (1) 268 (2) 269 (3) 269 (4) 270 (5) 270 (6) 27
SUMMARY 2014 26 4 26 5 30 257 258 259 259 (1) 259 (2) 259 (3) 260 260 (1) 260 (2) 261 (3) 261 262 (1) 262 (2) 266 (3) 267 (4) 268 268 (1) 268 (2) 269 (3) 269 (4) 270 (5) 270 (6) 270 (7) 271 (8) 271 271
わが国証券市場、証券業界の戦後70年
I 70 Kiyoshi Nikami / / 1 70 2 2 3 4 70 1 1987 1990 2 072 2015 winter / No.406 5 II 4 4 3 18 Loan Contractor 3 2011 6 391 2012 spring 70 073 4 4 originating Manager 4 M.H. 1965 6 1987 12 074 2015 winter
Hills 00 ICI0 993 994 995 464,05 00 99,989 3 37,78 464 44,05 37,377 44 009 777,8 304,044 69 07,08 005 300,80 86,83 5,004 006 4,550 3,487 0,54 007 608,4 300,930 9 34,648 008 53,88 66,6 3 57,09 8,975 65,0
Title Author(s) Kobe University Repository : Kernel 流 動 性 危 機 : レパレッジとモニタリング (< 特 集 > 世 界 金 融 危 機 )(Liquidity Crisis : Leverage and Monitoring ( World Financial Crisis)) 丸 茂, 俊 彦 Citation 国 民 経 済 雑 誌,203(1):107-119
PBO 2000~ PBO Funded Ratio - 12/31/93 to Present 140% 130% 120% 110% 100% 90% 82.6% as of 7/31/ % 70% 81.6% as of YE % 1993
2004 PBO 2000~2002 3 10 1990 PBO Funded Ratio - 12/31/93 to Present 140% 130% 120% 110% 100% 90% 82.6% as of 7/31/2004 80% 70% 81.6% as of YE 1993 60% 199312 199412 199512 199612 199712 199812 199912 200012
わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―
GCGC SC GCSC SC SC E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] GC general collateralscspecial collateral Griffiths and Winters GCFF Jordan and JordanDuffie matched book GC GC SC DuffieKrishnamurthy
野村資本市場研究所｜JOBS法の成立と米国IPO市場の今後の動向（PDF）
JOBS IPO 1. IPO the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, JOBS 2012 4 5 JOBS IPO 2. Regulation 144A Emerging Growth CompaniesEGC 404(b) 3. EGC JOBS IPO JOBS 4. JOBS NASDAQ IPO JOBS JOBS IPO 125 2012 Autumn
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J-17 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-17 1999 6 * JEL classification E52 E58
(1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) S&L (1) (2) (3) S&L (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) 2 New York
S C B SHINKIN CENTRAL BANK 104-0031 3-8-1 TEL.03-3563-7541 FAX.03-3563-7551 http://www.scbri.jp/ FDIC New York 15-5 2004.2 (1) (2) (3) (4) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (1) (2) (3) (4) S&L (1)
野村資本市場研究所｜アジアの金融競争力（PDF）
2013 Spring 1. GDP 3 26% 2. 3. 4. GDP 1 GDP 2000 25.4% 2012 10 IMF 1 GDP 28.7%GDP 10.7% 20.3% 2000 2012 10 2 3 2000 2012 4.2 5.4 2 2000 14% 2012 26% GDP 2012 30 10 32003 11 2013 Spring 100% 2 90% 80% 70%
中田真佐男 ３２３‐３５２／３２３‐３５２
IT FinTech Finance Technology e SNS (AI) (2013) (2015) ATM IC EMV VISA MasterJCB VISA Master (Union Pay) VISA Master JCB J-Debit J-Debit VISA IC Alipay QR POS nanaco WAON EdyJR Suica PASMO au Master au
関西における地域銀行について
I Yasuharu Suzuki / 1990 1 23 3 2011 6 10 105 106 2011 10 3 2 1951 3 6 204 2011 winter / No.390 II 1 63 42 105 1 2011 9 105 2 2 5 2 1 1872 153 3 20 1893 1949 1954 12 6 7 9 8 4 4 1,420 1926186 1941 194561
2 4 8 UFJ24 1 14 24 UFJ 3 CS 32 IT 34 37 ALM 57 58 243 59 66 69 9 92 94 117 UFJ 117 UFJ 153 UFJ 29 259 264 215229
UFJ 24 2 4 8 UFJ24 1 14 24 UFJ 3 CS 32 IT 34 37 ALM 57 58 243 59 66 69 9 92 94 117 UFJ 117 UFJ 153 UFJ 29 259 264 215229 24UFJ 247 UFJ UFJ UFJ UFJ UFJ 22 3 23 3 24 3 UFJ UFJ 13,629 13,715 11,982 1,641
米欧における認識中止に関する会計基準と開示規則の動向：リーマン・ブラザーズの「レポ105」を巡る対応を踏まえて
105 105 105 105 IFRS 105 IFRS IFRS IFRS E-mail: [email protected] / /2011.8 73 1. 2008 9 15 1 11 11 2 AntonR.Valukas 3 United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York [2010] 4 105
レイアウト 1
1 1 3 5 25 41 51 57 109 2 4 Q1 A. 93% 62% 41% 6 7 8 Q1-(1) Q2 A. 24% 13% 52% Q3 Q3 A. 68% 64 Q3-(2) Q3-(1) 9 10 A. Q3-(1) 11 A. Q3-(2) 12 A. 64% Q4 A. 47% 47% Q5 QQ A. Q Q A. 13 QQ A. 14 Q5-(1) A. Q6
10_11p01(Ł\”ƒ)
q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q qq q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q q
