, 3, 1999, 4,,

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download ", 3, 1999, 4,,"

Transcription

1 1, ,,, 10 2,, ,,, ,, 3,,, 2002,

2 , 3, 1999, 4,,

3 I, 10,, , 2,, 3, 4,, II,, ,, II-1: ,, ,, 3

4 , 96 3,, 2,, ,,, ,, , 3,,,,, 1, II , 8 3,,, 1,

5 4, 5 1 2,,, Diamond and Dybvig (1983),,,, Freixas and Rochet (1997) Dewatripont and Tirole (1994),, 1 2 3, 4 5,, II-3: 5

6 ,,, BIS BIS,, 05,, , , BIS , 1 :, 1997, Tier2, 8% 2 3, 5%,, 6

7 8% 1997,, 1, BIS, BIS Brewer III et al (2003) 90, /, /, 3, Horiuchi and Shimizu (1998) Ito and Sasaki 2002) 1 90,

8 8 Shrieves and Dahl (2003) II-4:, 3, 90,,,,,,

9 , 1,?,, (entrenchment) Hanazaki and Horiuchi (2003) ( ), (2000) , 80 90, Hosono and Sakuragawa (2002) BIS BIS, (2002) 98 9

10 Caballero et al (2003) ,, Montgomery(2005) , Ito and Sasaki 2002), , 85 Konishi and Yasuda(2004) , 54,,, 4,,, 4 (2003), ,,, 10

11 II-5: ,, , , ,, ,, 3 Spiegel and Yamori (2003),,, 11

12 1998, , , 3, 90,,, 1,, , 4, Tier1 (2005), 2005 Skinner(2005) 1998, 2002, , 2003, 1, 2002, 45% ,, 12

13 II-6:,,,,,,, ,, ,, , Hosono (2004) ,,, Murata Hori (2006), Hosono(2004),, II-7: , 3 1, 2, 13

14 , 3, 102 1, 2,,, , , 3,,, ,,, ,, Fukuda and Koibuchi (

15 3 (2006) ,, BIS BIS 3,,,, 5,, 3 II-8: 2,,,,,,, , 1, Tier2 15

16 , 4, 2001, BIS, 1, 5 5,,,, , , 2 3, UFJ, Berger et al(2000), 2004, UFJ 16

17 BIS II-9: , 5, ,, 3, , 5,, ,, 1990 III, , , (2005) , 30, 17

18 , 2003, 20%, (2006), 5,,,,,, , GDP, , 6 10%,, 5 8%,, 18

19 IV:,, , 24% 224% Hoggarth et al(2002) ,, 3 60, 50, 112, 112, 112,, GDP 92, 16 Hoggarth et al(2002),, , OECD International Financial statistics Hoggarth et al(2002) , 1992, Hoggarth et al(2002) GDP GDP 61, GDP,, 162,

20 , 1, 45% GDP 90, , ,, 90 V, 14 3,,, 20

21 ,, , 1993, (2005), (2005) (2003), (2002) (2005) (2006) (2002) (2002), ) Recapitalization, moral hazard behavior and commitment to bailing out the insolvent banks ( 1996 ) 21

22 (2003), 9 (2003) A (2005), (2000),? ( ) Berger, AN, SM Davies, and MJ Flannery, (2000), "Comparing market and supervisory assessments of bank performance: who knows what when?, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 32(3), Brewer, Elijah III, Hesna Genay, William Curt Hunter, and George G Kaufman, (2003), Does the Japanese Stock Market Price Bank-Risk? Evidence from Financial Firm Failures, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 35(4), Caballero, Ricardo J, Takeo Hoshi, and Anil K Kashyap, (2003) Zombie Lending and Depressed Restructuring in Japan, presented at the NBER/CEPR/CIRJE/EIJS Japan Project Meeting held in Tokyo Dewatripont, M, and J Tirole, (1994), The Prudential Regulation of Banks, the MIT press Diamond, D W and P H Dybvig (1983), Bank runs, deposit insurance and liquidity, Journal of Political Economy: Fukuda, Shin-ichi and S Koibuchi, (2006), The impact of shock therapy under a banking crisis: experience from three large bank failures in Japan, Japanese Economic Review 57, p Freixas, X, and J-C Rochet (1997), Microeconomics of Banking, The MIT Press Hanazaki, M, and A Horiuchi, (2003), A review of Japan s bank crisis from the governance perceptive, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 11, Hoggarth, G, R Reis, and V Saporta, (2002), Cost of banking system instability: some empirical evidence, Journal of Banking & Finance 26: Konishi and Yasuda (2004), Factors affecting bank risk taking: evidence from Japan, Journal of Banking and Finance 28, Horiuchi, Akiyoshi, and Katsutoshi Shimizu, (1998) The Deterioration of Bank Balance Sheets in Japan: Risk-Taking and Recapitalization, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 6,

23 Hosono, K, (2004), Depositors discipline during the banking crisis in Japan? Discussion papers series 04-1, Gakusyuin University Hosono, K, and M Sakuragawa (2002), Bad loans and accounting discretion, Ito, Takatoshi, and Yuri Nagataki Sasaki (2002), Impacts of the Basel Capital Standard on Japanese Banks Behavior, Journal of the Japanese and International Economics 16, Montgomery, H, The effect of the Basel Accord on bank portfolio in Japan, Journal of the Japanese and International Economics 19, (2005), Murata, K, and MHori, (2006), Do small depositors exit from bad banks? evidence from small financial institutions in Japan? Japanese Economic Review 57, p Shrieves, Ronald E, and Drew Dahl, (2003), Discretionary Accounting and the Behavior of Japanese Banks under Financial Duress, Journal of Banking and Finance 27, Skinner, Douglas J, (2005), The Rise of Deferred Tax assets in Japan, The Case of the Major Japanese Banks Spiegel, MM, and Y, Nobuyoshi, (2003), The impact of Japan s financial stabilization laws on bank equity values, Journal of the Japanese and International Economics 17,

24

25

26

27

28

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程 1991 2003 GDP....................................... http://www.stat.go.jp/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ GDP http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/ GDP - - - inflation targeting Krugman a IS-LM liquidity trap Krugman b Krugman

More information

橡motonishi.PDF

橡motonishi.PDF 2000 3 ITME Discussion Paper No.26 850-8506 4-2-1 [email protected] 1 1 MRF 1 (2000) 2 MRF 2 Schreft (1997) 3 2 Tobin (1985) Friedman (1992) 3 3 4 5 3 4 5 2 White (1984) 1 4 (1996) (1999) (1999)

More information

untitled

untitled 2007 2 * (i) (ii) 2006 7 1999 2 2000 8 1 (2003) Oda and Ueda (2005) 2005 Kimura and Small(2006) Iwamura, Shiratsuka and Watanabe (2006) (2006) 3 (i) (ii) (iii) 2 2 3 4 2.1 (2003) (2005) 1) (i) (ii) (i)

More information

Title Author(s) Kobe University Repository : Kernel 流 動 性 危 機 : レパレッジとモニタリング (< 特 集 > 世 界 金 融 危 機 )(Liquidity Crisis : Leverage and Monitoring ( World Financial Crisis)) 丸 茂, 俊 彦 Citation 国 民 経 済 雑 誌,203(1):107-119

More information

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて * ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East

More information

国際流動性に関する財政的側面について

国際流動性に関する財政的側面について IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: [email protected] / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]

More information

中田真佐男 323‐352/323‐352

中田真佐男 323‐352/323‐352 IT FinTech Finance Technology e SNS (AI) (2013) (2015) ATM IC EMV VISA MasterJCB VISA Master (Union Pay) VISA Master JCB J-Debit J-Debit VISA IC Alipay QR POS nanaco WAON EdyJR Suica PASMO au Master au

More information

野村資本市場研究所|国際基準との調和も踏まえた米国SIFI規制(PDF)

野村資本市場研究所|国際基準との調和も踏まえた米国SIFI規制(PDF) SIFI 1. FRB 2011 12 20 500 FRB SIFI 500 FRB 2. SIFI FRB G-SIB 2016 LCR NSFR 3. SIFI 25 SIFI 10 2 SIFI 4. SIFI 83 2012 Winter FRB FRB 2011 12 20 1 SIFIFRB 2011 4 6 2012 165 (a) interconnected 500 bank holding

More information

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─ q E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] OECD Vives Tirole Shleifer and Vishny q %% %% % % Allen and Gale %% % Admati, Pfreiderer and Zechner Burkart, Gromb and Panunzi Cremer 1995Pagno

More information

経済経営研究

経済経営研究 Vol.26 No.7 2006 3 1990 * * E-mail: [email protected] Bank Lending and Firm Investment under the Depression of the 1990s in Japan Economics Today, Vol.26, No.7, March, 2006 Kenji TANAKA Research Institute

More information

The Institute for Economic Studies Seijo University 6 1 20, Seijo, Setagaya Tokyo 157-8511, Japan The Institute for Economic Studies Green Paper No. 59 Consumers Decision on the Choice of Small Payment

More information

........,.,.,..,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., International Capital Market Litan et al a b c d M&A a a b E- e- Litan et al. : Table Levine World Bank Levine Greenwald et al. B R F R r R R r B R r B R r B R R Stiglitz

More information

M&A の経済分析:M&A はなぜ増加したのか

M&A の経済分析:M&A はなぜ増加したのか RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-J-034 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-J-034 M&A の経済分析 :M&A はなぜ増加したのか 蟻川靖浩 宮島英昭 ( 早稲田大学 RIETI) 2006 年 4 月 要旨 1990 年代以降の M&A の急増の主要な要因は 産業や企業の成長性や収益性へのショックである とりわけ M&A を活発に行っている産業あるいは企業の特性としては

More information

[ ]{木山(判例)}(責)魏.indd

[ ]{木山(判例)}(責)魏.indd 59 3 2017 29 2 8 I 1 36 1 2 2 26 44 2 3 4 36 17 44 2 1 2 1 8 2 8 4 3 2 8 3 26 10 4 26 2014 103 91 5 6 28 1 183 1 7 5 44 2 2 2 26 36 17 6 1315 2006 192 1317 2006 268 6 1 2016 71 2 2017 29 7 15 8 27 253

More information

Microsoft Word - 査読SP問題110510RR.doc

Microsoft Word - 査読SP問題110510RR.doc JAVCERM Journal [] 2 # 2011_01_Ronko 2010 1 4 2011 5 12 1 2 2 1999 National Bank of Keystone(Keystone), Pacific Thrift and Loan(PLT) FDIC CAMEAL 20 20 1 11 6 2.2 2000 Greenspan FRB 2000 IT IT Greenspan[2004]

More information

autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)

autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A) Discussion Paper Series A No.425 2002 2 186-8603 [email protected] 14 1 24 autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] 1990 12 13 (A) 12370027 13 1 1980 Lo/MacKinlay [1988]

More information

産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf 2003 11 10 IT IT JIP JCER ) 2003 CD-ROM http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/bun/bun170/170index. html 1 JIP Jorgenson, Mun, andstiroh (2002) GDP 2 3 1951 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981

More information

An Empirical Study of the Securities Firms' Dilemma on Financial Innovation through Diffusion of Internet Deals Yasugi Satoshi Bower, J. L., 1999, Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave,

More information

PDFŠpŒ{ٶ

PDFŠpŒ{ٶ Shinkin Central Bank Monthly Review 2003.12 hinkin Central Bank Monthly Review 200312 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Community Banker 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36

More information

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G 濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G34 950-2181 2 8050 Tel. and fax: 025-262-6538 E-mail: [email protected]

More information

復活だぁっ! 日本の不況と流動性トラップの逆襲

復活だぁっ! 日本の不況と流動性トラップの逆襲 It s Baaack! Japan s Slump and the Return of the Liquidity Trap 1998 2001 8 29-9 9 Ver.1.0.1 1 2 2 5 2.1..................................... 5 2.2......................... 6 2.3.........................

More information

季刊 企業と法創造 第1巻第4号(通巻第4号)

季刊 企業と法創造 第1巻第4号(通巻第4号) Aoki and Patrick Hoshi and Kashyap ROE 125 ROA Aoki Odagiri Frankl Fruin 126 NEEDS ROE ROA ROE ROEROA ROE ROEIQ ROE ROE ROE 127 128 IQ ROE ROE ROE ROE ROA ROE 129 Miyajima 130 Okazaki Teranishi GHQ % Prowse,

More information

RIETI Highlight VOL.25

RIETI Highlight VOL.25 RIETI Highlight 2009 SUMMER 25 VOL. Research Digest RIETI 2009 SUMMER VOL. 25 Highlight 1 2 3 5 8 10 12 13 14 19 ResearchDigest 20 24 28 32 36 38 40 41 42 44 45 RIETI Topics 01 CONTENTS 02 RIETI Highlight

More information

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書 17 1 2 3 4 5 11 16 30,247 17 18 21,024 +2.0 6 12 13 WHO 100 14 7 15 2 5 8 16 9 10 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 II I 18 Durkheim(1897) Hamermesh&Soss(1974)Dixit&Pindyck(1994) Becker&Posner(2004) Rosenthal(1993)

More information

,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kakei/qa-1.ht

,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kakei/qa-1.ht 1, 1, 2011 4 3-28,,.,,.,.,,.,,.,,.,.,. 1., 1), 1946.,, GDP,.,,,.,,., (2008) ( NIRA ), 23,.,,, 2).,,,.,,.,,., 657-8501 2-1, E-mail: [email protected] 1) 1. 2), 1990 2 21, 1993 6 12. 3 1 1 2011

More information

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析 196 2017 * ** ** 1 2 3 JEL Classification Codes D14, D15, E21 Keywords * 28 Hyun- Hoon Lee Robert Owen Kwanho Shin ** 29 196 An Empirical Analysis of the Saving Behavior of Elderly Households in Japan

More information

2 / 24

2 / 24 2017 11 9 1 / 24 2 / 24 Solow, 1957 total factor productivity; TFP 5% 経済成長率の要因分解 4% 3% 2.68% 2.51% 2% 1% 0% 1.63% 1.50% 0.34% 0.42% 0.55% 0.97% 1.14% 0.86% 0.13% -0.59% -0.59% -0.09% 0.01% -1% 1970-80

More information

bottleneckjapanese.dvi

bottleneckjapanese.dvi 1 M&A Keywords:,. Address: 742-1, Higashinakano, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 192-09,Japan fax:+81 426 74 425 E-mail: [email protected] ; [email protected] 1 Yang and Kawashima(2008) 1 2 ( MVI

More information

わが国証券市場、証券業界の戦後70年

わが国証券市場、証券業界の戦後70年 I 70 Kiyoshi Nikami / / 1 70 2 2 3 4 70 1 1987 1990 2 072 2015 winter / No.406 5 II 4 4 3 18 Loan Contractor 3 2011 6 391 2012 spring 70 073 4 4 originating Manager 4 M.H. 1965 6 1987 12 074 2015 winter

More information

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8660 30 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-45 199912 12 1986 General Agreement of Trade in Service Multilateral

More information

-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs

-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs BIS FRB BIS BIS FRB QE QE -February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs GDP GDP........ GDP BIS, 83rd Annual Report, June 2013, p.14 Ibid., p.14. -February 1 1 2009 2013 2) 2009 2013 2) -7.6-4.0

More information

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3 Summer 08 59 I はじめに quasi market II III IV V 1 II 教育サービスにおける 準市場 1 教育サービスにおける 準市場 の意義 Education Reform Act 1988 1980 Local Education Authorities LEA Le Grand 1991 Glennerster 1991 3 1 2 3 2 60 Vol. 44

More information

表紙_目次.PDF

表紙_目次.PDF JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)

More information

わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―

わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析― GCGC SC GCSC SC SC E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] GC general collateralscspecial collateral Griffiths and Winters GCFF Jordan and JordanDuffie matched book GC GC SC DuffieKrishnamurthy

More information

44 4 I (1) ( ) (10 15 ) ( 17 ) ( 3 1 ) (2)

44 4 I (1) ( ) (10 15 ) ( 17 ) ( 3 1 ) (2) (1) I 44 II 45 III 47 IV 52 44 4 I (1) ( ) 1945 8 9 (10 15 ) ( 17 ) ( 3 1 ) (2) 45 II 1 (3) 511 ( 451 1 ) ( ) 365 1 2 512 1 2 365 1 2 363 2 ( ) 3 ( ) ( 451 2 ( 314 1 ) ( 339 1 4 ) 337 2 3 ) 363 (4) 46

More information

i ii i iii iv 1 3 3 10 14 17 17 18 22 23 28 29 31 36 37 39 40 43 48 59 70 75 75 77 90 95 102 107 109 110 118 125 128 130 132 134 48 43 43 51 52 61 61 64 62 124 70 58 3 10 17 29 78 82 85 102 95 109 iii

More information

商品流動性リスクの計量化に関する一考察(その2)―内生的流動性リスクを考慮したストレス・テスト―

商品流動性リスクの計量化に関する一考察(その2)―内生的流動性リスクを考慮したストレス・テスト― E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Bangia et al. G Bangia et al. exogenous liquidity risk endogenous liquidity risk et al LTCMLong Term Capital Management Fed G G T

More information

5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin

5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin 5 I. 3 1 1990 2 The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthening North Pacific Cooperation organized by the East-West

More information

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discuss ssion Paper No. 98-J-2 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discuss ssion Paper Series 98-J-2 1998 1 VaRVWAP E-mail: [email protected]

More information

2 I- I- (1) 2 I- (2) 2 I- 1 [18] I- I-. 1 I- I- Jensen [11] I- FF 3 I- FF 3 2 2.1 CAPM n ( i = 1,..., n) M t R i,t, i = 1,..., n R M,t ( ) R i,t = r i

2 I- I- (1) 2 I- (2) 2 I- 1 [18] I- I-. 1 I- I- Jensen [11] I- FF 3 I- FF 3 2 2.1 CAPM n ( i = 1,..., n) M t R i,t, i = 1,..., n R M,t ( ) R i,t = r i 1 Idiosyncratic,, Idiosyncratic (I- ) I- 1 I- I- Jensen I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 1 Fama-French (FF) 3 [6] (Capital Asset Pricing Model; CAPM [12, 15]) CAPM ( [2, 10, 14, 16]) [18] Idiosyncratic

More information

会社法制上の資本制度の変容と企業会計上の資本概念について

会社法制上の資本制度の変容と企業会計上の資本概念について IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2006-J-1 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 30 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2006-J-1 2006 1

More information

Kobe University Repository : Kernel タイトル Title 著者 Author(s) 掲載誌 巻号 ページ Citation 刊行日 Issue date 資源タイプ Resource Type 版区分 Resource Version 権利 Rights DOI ごみ有料化は自治体の財政負担をどれだけ軽減するのか?(Does Unitbased Pricing of

More information

中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 2012 年 3 月 審査論文 1 Keywords: JEL Classi cation: L13, L22, L33 1 * *1 Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (2009) Mukherjee and Suestrong

中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 2012 年 3 月 審査論文 1 Keywords: JEL Classi cation: L13, L22, L33 1 * *1 Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (2009) Mukherjee and Suestrong 中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 22 年 3 月 審査論文 Keywords: JEL Classication: L3, L22, L33 * 2373253 * Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (29)Mukherjee and Suestrong (29) Long and Stähler (29)Gil-Molto, Poyago-Theotoky, and Zikos (2)Matsumura

More information

IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J-17 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-17 1999 6 * JEL classification E52 E58

More information

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析― 196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data

More information

Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Quarterly Journal of Economics Review of Economics and Statistics Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis Economics of Education Review Journal of Political

More information

金融規制における課徴金制度の抑止効果と法的課題

金融規制における課徴金制度の抑止効果と法的課題 D&O D&O E-mail: [email protected] / /2015.7 143 1. 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 1 2005 13 2 3 6 2 172 2007 31 2 34 21 2 4 2005 40 172 2 1 1 25 3 28 24 301 5 175 1 2 6 2005 13 144 /2015.7 7 8 fairness retribution

More information

金融コングロマリットと範囲の経済:収益面の分析( )

金融コングロマリットと範囲の経済:収益面の分析( ) 3 ING 1998 2001 16 2 13 3 23 1 1 2 Herring and Santomero 1990 (1992) 3 2 Berger, Hanweck and Humphre(1987) 3 4 1 2 4 3 3 4 1 2 (2003) 3 Group of Ten (2001) 4 24 Berger, Hanweck and Humphre(1987) 1 2 3

More information