Vol. 12 No. 2 2002 219 239 Λ1 Λ1 729 1 2 29 4 3 4 5 1) 2) 3) 4 6) 7 27) Λ1 701-0193 288 219
220 28;29) 30 35) 26;27) 0 6 7 12 13 18 59.9% 8.0% 9 36) 8) 14) 37) 1 1 1 13 6 7 O O 13 2 E S 1 1 17 0 6 1 585 765 48.3% 729 46.0% 2 6 1fl 2fl 3fl 3 4fl 5) 29 3 SPSS WINDOWS Ver 9 2 29 37 692 3 2 1 0 SD R
221 4 LSD 217 196 191 3 29 58 37 692 3 3 692 29 1 1 1 1 3 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 30 34 42.9% 33.2 4.4 35 39 36.1% 35.9 5.6 1 6 68.3% 1 5.7 2.9 2 0.1% 1 20 40 2 1 2 1 32.0% 27.9% 28.1% 3 80.3% 5.8 % 41.8% 37.3% 24.7% 1
222 2 1 2
223 3 4 37.8% 28.1% 4 35.2% 26.1% 13.6% 0.1% 30.7% 26.5% 4 23.2% 0.1% 48.8% 4 35.7% 1 3 1 76.1% 3 14.5% 1% 86.6% 73.4% 69.3% 30 19.9% 0.1% 5 9 31.4% 3 4 23.8% 1 2 21.8% 1 11.6% 57.4% 42.6% 0.1%
224 70.4% 58.4% 41.3% 2 48.7% 4 39.3% 5% 4 36.1% 28.8% 22.5% 2 2 1 3 77.7% 90.5% 1% 5% 83.5% 78.3.1% 69.3% 93.1% 87.6% 85.2% 3
225 2 2 3 89.5% 84.1% 5% 1% 90.9% 89.6% 85.3% 89.5% 84.0% 75.2% 2 3 5 78.0% 71.0% 68.6% 3 85.3% 77.2% 69.5% 5% 46.8% 33.0% 28.7% 1% 48.0% 5% 53.5% 45.8% 41.6% 4.0% 5% 7.4 % 3.4% 1.3% 2 4 6 64.6% 59.3% 52.7% 6.4% 0.1% 63.9% 41.1% 44.5% 5% 52.8% 40.9% 38.1% 5% 36.5% 28.8% 22.1% 2 5 3 64.6% 75.7% 63.1% 56.3% 43.7% 5
226 6 1% 12.3% 7.7% 6.1% 5.5% 0.1% 5% 3 3 1 3 4 3 61.9% 0.1% 80.0% 55.2% 43.8% 3 2 4 21.9% 78.1% 0.1% 36.9% 16.3% 8.9% 3 3 71.4% 27.4% 98.3 % 4 5% 80.6% 68.3% 65.2% 4 4 1 4 1 1 75.0 5.0 39.3 11.3 5 7 29 5 27 2.03 2 1.94 3R 0.29 17R 0.79
227 4 5 1.29 1.32 1.36 1.41 4 5 29 29 4 7 0.1% 0.72 0.74
228 7 1.00 1.13 10 25 26 5% 10 1.22 1.24 1.44 1.47 25 1.00 1.01 1.07 1.23 26 0.78 0.84 1.00 4 4 1 2 6 7 > 10 > 25 26 > 4 2 3 29 1.000 7 8 9 3 7 7 5 1 5 2 4 3 8 8 1 7 2 6 3 4
229 6 LSD 7 8 9 1 7 2 5 3 4 1 2 3 3 1 1 3 5 3 2 3 2 5 1 10 5 1 1 10
230 8 9
231 10 5% 5 1 2 5% 5% 1% 5 1 3 M 5% 5 1 4 5% 5% 5 2 11 5 2 1 11 1% 0.1% 5% 0.1% 5 2 2 1% 0.1% 1% 5 2 3
232 11 0.1% 1% 5% 1% 5% 5% 5% 0.1% 5% 5 2 4 1% 1% 5% 5% 5% 5 2 5 5%
233 5% 5% 5 3 12 12 3 1% 3 5% 1 8) 13) 29 7 1% 10 5% 25 5% 26 5% 4 4 7 > 10 > 25 26 > 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 3 12
234 4 2 7 3 7 10 25 26 7 10 2 14) 3 3 1 10 2 10 2 10 2 10 2
235 3 2 11 3 11 0.1% 3 5 11 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 8
236 8 1 2 29 4 7 10 25 26 3 4 7 > 10 > 25 > 4 5 4 6 7
237 8 3 25) 35) 12 55 1 10 82 107 1998 2 3 34 56 1982 3 42 11 870 874 2000 4 30 27 39 1994 5 31 27 42 1995 6 II 32 29 47 1996 7 2 41 51 1981 8 4 67 77 1983 9 6 11 24 1985 10 9 1 13 1987 11 10 23 31 1988 12 12 4 415 420 1989 13 303 12 14 1996 14 4 17 29 1997 15 3 233 1998 16 IBU 32 40 63 76 1999 17 2 19 38 1999 18 99 87 98 2000 19 1 48 123 129 1999 20 2 49 125 132 2000 21 3 53 59 1999
238 22 0 1 3 61 70 1999 23 46 7 521 531 1999 24 2 115 200 2000 25 49 6 22 29 2000 26 12 1 27 43 2002 27 12 1 45 57 2002 28 125 251 1991 29 Externalizing 11 10 1 32 45 1999 30 III 33 35 56 1997 31 IV 34 93 111 1998 32 V 35 109 143 1999 33 V 35 117 138 2000 34 37 159 180 2001 35 1 2 58 6 697 704 1999 36 9 47 48 1998 37 27 1 1 13 2003 14 10 31
239 A Study on Relation between Mothers' Anxiety to Raising Children and Working Situation Makiko YAEGASHI and Takanori OGAWA (Accepted Oct. 31, 2002) Key words : anxieties about child rearing, child care support, working situation, fewer number of children Abstract Due to developing urbanization, there is an increase in the nuclear family and a decrease in the number of children. As a result there is an increase in the number of mothers who have became anxious and neurotic about raising their children. In addition, more women will work out of the home and their working situations will vary. Therefore, we need to study about mothers' anxiety to raising their children based on their working situation. This study was aimed at clarifying what kind of working situation influenced their anxiety about raising children. The subjects were 729 mothers whose children attended a nursery or a kindergarten. The method was a questionnaire investigation. We compared and discussed anxiety scores and anxiety structures among housewives, part-time working mothers and full-time working mothers about raising children. In addition, we discussed the relation between possible causes of mothers' anxiety to raising children and their working situation. The findings were as follows: 1 The score of part-time working mothers' anxietywas the highest. The next was the one of housewives. The one of full-time working mothers was the lowest. However, a significant difference was not found. 2 About 4 items of mothers' anxiety toward raising their children, a significant difference was found among working situations. 3 As a result of factor analysis on mothers' anxiety with or without work, it showed that elements of working mothers' anxiety and non-working mothers' was different. 4 Full-time working mothers and non-working housewives felt "severe responsibility and pressure" toward raising their children. Part-time working mothers and full-time ones had "restless stress." And, part-time working mothers showed strong anxiety and depression. 5 Afactor causing anxiety in raising children and showing a relation to anxiety in the raising of children among non-working housewives, part-time working mothers and full-time ones was found. Correspondence to : MakikoYAEGASHI Department ofmedical Social Work, Faculty of Medical Welfare Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare Kurashiki, 701-0193, Japan (Kawasaki Medical Welfare Journal Vol.12, No.2, 2002 219 239)