世界標準の子宮頸がん予防対策 なぜ日本だけが遅れるのか

Similar documents
世界標準の子宮頸がん予防対策 なぜ日本だけが遅れるのか

小児感染免疫第23巻第1号

労 働 Health Care Quality Indicators Project - 6 data collection update report (OECD Health Working Paper No. 29) 5-Oct-7 HPV-18 ( 99 HPV 8 HPV 9 B B C

EPSON Safety Instructions Manual


GDP TFP CRD

untitled

国際比較からみた介護システムの役割分担

ares_018

Slide 1

HPV HPV HPV HPV 7 HPV 8 9 HPV 3 HPV HPV HPV , Becker Ajzen H

GDP 10 GDP Bureau of Economic Analysis 2

-February GDP GDP

II a b b c d m a. 2 1

6.indd

食品、飲料、製薬、医療用途向けシーリングソリューション

untitled

001


HPV HPV HPV 50% 1 HPV 96%, 93% HPV 90% HPV16/18 8 HPV HPV HPV16/18 HPV16/18 1,9,10 HPV16/18 70% HPV16/18 HPV HPV 11 HPV HPV HPV HPV16/18 HPV

15690B_表紙1-4.pdf

工業意匠の国際登録制度:ハーグ条約

<836D815B B E95E292D48AD BB A835E838D834F5F4D4B D8CB32E706466>

Microsoft PowerPoint - SeminarNaft-I-Re.IntISMS&Standards-V

担保資産としての金

...S.....\1_4.ai

0516(資料9-2)【概要】HPVワクチンの有効性

GNH Gross National Happiness Criteria living standard cultural diversity emotional well being health education time use eco-system community vitality

[ OASIS SAMPLE-EXTRACTION PRODUCTS ] LC-MS HPLC UPLC 1

untitled

No.10

PowerPoint Presentation

日産婦専攻医プログラム (HPVワクチン) 提出版.pptx

花井清人 25‐58/25‐58

- 1 -

# _ qxd

Microsoft Word - AY2017F MFR Application Guideline J

II) SIR SMR)

Microsoft PowerPoint - 第2部(1):1.8.e164.arpaのデリゲーションについて_rev2.ppt

untitled

untitled

# _15683.qxd

J. Jpn. Soc. Clin. Cytol. 2002; 41 (3): Key words: Interphase cytogenetics-cervical smears-diagnostic cytology

& Groovy TM Shorty TM

ドメイン名に関する各種統計資料

M-JUSD2471b

main.dvi

untitled

GLOBAL FALLOUT 1

Dynamics-NAV

5 I The Current Situation and Future Prospects of the North Korean Economy presented at the 2014 Korea Dialogue Conference on Strengthenin

untitled

デンマークの農業 デンマーク農業理事会

untitled

untitled

Core Ethics Vol. c HPV HPV HPV? HPV HPV WHO WHO, FDA FDA, b PMDA PMDA WHO FDA HPV WHO FDA PMDA HPV HPV HPV HPV WHO FDA HPV WHO HPV % HPV HIV HPV WHO G

Rinku General Medical Center

INTRODUCING BSI MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

HPVファクトシート

NX10_150223J16AB_0116.ai

NO2

3.持続可能な交通の国際比較

MDGs Millennium Development Goals MDGsMDGs C

IP Triple Play Copyright 2006, Allied Telesis Holdings, A rights reserved.

スライド 1

Microsoft PowerPoint Y社説明資料_0924.pptx

島根大チュートリアル学習2011

スライド 1

Microsoft Word - 11 統計 解説.doc

ParkOptions&ACC_2001_Jap.ai

第 24 回 GLP 研修会 平成 31 年 1 月 21 日東京平成 31 年 1 月 25 日大阪 OECD GLP における最近の活動について 独立行政法人医薬品医療機器総合機構信頼性保証部主任専門員三枝由紀恵 1


2

2 24

薬剤耐性 (AMR について 背景 抗菌薬が効かなくなる薬剤耐性 (AMR 感染症が世界的に拡大 公衆衛生および社会経済的に重大な影響を与えている 一方で 新規の抗菌薬等の開発は近年停滞 このままでは AMR に対する対抗手段が枯渇 米国における新規抗菌薬剤数と薬剤耐性菌の出現傾向の推移 国際社会の

資料7(予測結果の評価方法)

証明書記載参考 (EU 等向け ) 平成 26 年 4 月 1 日現在 1 Declaration for the import into the Union of ( ) ( ) に食品の場合は Food from Japan 飼料の場合は Feed from Japa n と記載 2 Batch

Microsoft PowerPoint - 資料2 【最終版】AMR現状と対応161201

Descartes Systems Group

スライド 1

F4_LIFULL_A4_16P_pantone2018c

PowerPoint プレゼンテーション


<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

DSG Helping Customers Deliver - EU ENS - Global Filer

スライド 1

スライド 1

2 The Bulletin of Meiji University of Integrative Medicine 3, Yamashita 10 11

NEWS LETTER No.10 (Page 1)

Company_2801.ai

UACJレポート2017

untitled

調査資料 -253 国際 国内会議録の簡易分析に基づく 我が国の人工知能研究動向把握の試み 2016 年 8 月 文部科学省科学技術 学術政策研究所 科学技術予測センター 小柴等

I II III 28 29

生活設計レジメ

44 4 I (1) ( ) (10 15 ) ( 17 ) ( 3 1 ) (2)


Yubidenwa Apple Apple iphone ipod touch ipad itunes Apple Inc. 1

2: VPN Australia, Austria, Canada, China, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Italy, Kenya, Korea, Republic of, Malaysia, N

Microsoft PowerPoint - DynamicsNAV_業務に合わせたシステムの構築 ppt

Transcription:

HPV

HPV HPV

WHO position paper 2009 April HPV HPV

5 I 1,137 92.1 II 447 69.8 III 428 48.9 IV 151 17.2 25 15000 (0 7000 3500

7

( ) 8

Rate per 100,000 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Age 1. Ferlay J et al. Globocan 2002. IARCPress 2004.

58 507 518,2009 17 12

13

Cervical Cancer Screening in Korea Since 1989: for Health Insurance Beneficiaries % Since 1999: for Medicaid women 90 80 70 Pap rate 76.8 73.6 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 22.4 39.8 41.5 Ever screened 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007 Including opportunistic screening Data Source: National Health & Nutrition Survey in 1995, 1998, 2001 NCC (telephone survey) in 2004, 2007 Konno R, Shin HR, et al JJCO (in press)

Call/Recall 10 Quinn M, Babb P, Jones J et al.: Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics. BMJ3;318(7188):904-8, 1999 3 15

HPV Human Papillomavirus) DNA DNA 100 HPV 30~40 HPV 16,18,31,33,35,52,58 16,18 70 HPV 6,11 CIN

/ % >500 100 50 20 10 HPV-18 ( 99 HPV 80 HPV 90 B 60 B 60 C 40 80 1 Baseline reference % 0.1 ( 90 0.6 0.1 B 40 B 90 F.X. Bosch et all. in J. Clin Pathol 2002

*CIN: cervical intraepithelial lesion = pre-cancerous lesion 50 1/1000 10 Garland S, Cuzick J, Konno R, et al. Vaccine 26. Suppl 12, 2008

HPV HPV 80

HPV

Dr. Papanicolaou Dr. zur Hausen Dr. Frazer

HPV Ref: MMWR 1999; 48(12):243 248

1. Franco EL, Harper DM. Vaccine. 2005;23:2388 2394. 2. Pagliusi SR, Aguado MT. Vaccine. 2004;23:569 578. surrogate marker CIN2,3 AIS HPV Surrogate marker HPV HPV CIN2,3 AIS

HPV16 18 67.1 Onuki M et al. 2009, Cancer Science

Development of HPV vaccine Assembly of Virus-Like Particle (VLP)

HPV 4 HPV 2 HPV HPV 6 11 16 18 16 18 g 20/40/40/20 20/20 L1 VLP Proprietary assembly/reassembly process increasing stability AAHS Amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate (Merck and Co., Inc.) AS04 Aluminum hydroxide + 3-deacetylated monophosphoryl lipid A (MPL, Corixa/GSK) 225 g 500 g/50 g VLP = vaccine-like particle. 1. Villa LL, Costa RLR, Petta CA, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6:671 678. 2. Harper DM, Franco EL, Wheeler C, et al. Lancet. 2004;364:1757 1765.

1.Konno R, Tamura S, Yoshikawa H.et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus 16/18 AS04- adjuvanted vaccine in Japanese women aged 20 to 25 years: interim analysis of a phase 2 doubleblind, randomized, controlled trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 20(3):404-10. 2.Konno R, Tamura S, Yoshikawa H.et al. Efficacy of Human Papillomavirus Type 16/18 AS04- Adjuvanted Vaccine in Japanese Women Aged 20 to 25 Years: Final Analysis of a Phase 2 Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 20(5):847-55. 3.Konno R, Tamura S, Yoshikawa H.et al. Immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of human papillomavirus 16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in Japanese women: interim analysis of a phase II, double-blind, randomized controlled trial at month 7. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 9(5):905-11.

TVC: total vaccinated cohort TVC-E: total vaccinated cohort for efficacy ATP-E: according to protocol for efficacy

Konno R et al. IGCS 2009; 19: 905-911

HPV-16/18 (12 ) (ASC-US+) CIN1+ CIN2+ N n HPV 408 7 HAV 406 39 HPV 365 0 HAV 369 6 HPV 408 1 * HAV 406 12 HPV 408 0 HAV 407 3 HPV 408 0 HAV 407 1 (95.5% CI) % LL UL P-value 82.5 59.8 93.6 <0.0001 100 11.2 100 0.0306 91.7 42.1 99.8 0.0017 100-156.8 100 0.1241 100-4288.9 100 0.4994

-HPV (6 ) (12 ) (ASC-US+) CIN1+ CIN2+ N HPV HAV HPV HAV 446 436 400 398 -HPV: HPV-16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 68 N= n= n 98 134 HPV 424 27 HAV 422 53 8 16 HPV 446 24 HAV 436 42 HPV 446 6 HAV 438 17 HPV 446 2 HAV 438 8 (95.5% CI) % LL UL P-value 31.2 50.7 9.5-24.4 47.8 82.1 0.0036 50.6 19.3 70.5 0.0022 0.1018 43.9 4.2 67.9 0.0207 64.9 4.9 89.0 0.02 75.1-28.4 97.6 0.0618

HPV (N = 519) HAV (N = 521) : 1 (95% CI) (0-29 ) 17.5% (14.4-21.1) 56.6% (52.3-61.0) 1.0% (0.3-2.2) 0.4% (0.0-1.4) 51.1% (46.7-55.4) 20.5% (17.1-24.3) 1.2% (0.4-2.5) 0.0% (0.0-0.7) : (%) 1 18 (3.5%) 22 (4.2%) 19 (3.6%) 21 (4.0%)

HPV CIN2+ CIN3+ 2 HPV TVC 1 n n, % 96.1% CI p CIN2+ 33 110 70.2 (54.7 80.9) < 0.0001 CIN3+ 3 23 87.0 (54.9 97.7) < 0.0001 HPV16/18 CIN2/3 52% 2 * 1. Paavonen J, et al. Lancet 2009; 374:301 14; 2. Smith JS, et al. Int J Cancer 2007; 121:621 632; 3. WHO/ICO Information Centre on Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) and Cervical Cancer. Available at: http://www.who.int/hpvcentre/statistics (accessed May 2009). 2 : III 39.4 TVC N = 5,449 N = 5,436 p % 96.1% CI 354 476 26.3 (14.7 36.4) < 0.0001 26 83 68.8 (50.0 81.2) < 0.0001 Paavonen J, et al. Lancet 2009; 374:301 314.

12 190-34.1% -72.6% 190 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 # 36,000 / 100% * 97 530 2008 ** /

HPV-16/18 HPV 50 70 Kirn JJ, Goldie SJ, et al Vaccine 26S (2008) K76-K86 (herd immunity) 95 HPV-16/18 Brisson M. IPV 2010.

HPV 10 11-14 15-25 26 26-45 HPV

2009 12 22 2010 3 21 50 115 1 1 1 12 1 32 1 2 1 11 13 1 4 5 1 1 22 17 13 8 7 6 6 5 2 5000

MSW HPV

1. HPV 2. HPV 3. 4. 5. 3 6. 7.

85% 85% 95 ( / 50% 91 10% 86 50% 82 69 54 10% 67 44 17 0% 64 38 8 EUROGIN Roadmap toward a consensus S. Franceschi (WHO, IARC) 15, Nov, 2008, EUROGIN2008

HPV * 6 1 98.8 1 65.8 3 ** 6-3 69.7 *** 3 * 10 1 ** 3 67 4 *** 3 2010 8 10

HPV

Global recommendations & reimbursement status Europe Cervarix Gardasil Iceland Cervarix & Gardasil Cervarix & Gardasil Cervarix and/or Gardasil Norway Sweden Liechtenstein Denmark Ireland UK Netherlands Poland Finland Estonia Latvia Lithuania Gibraltar Luxembourg Portugal Spain Belgium Germany Czech Republic Slovakia Austria France Switzerland Hungary Slovenia Italy Croatia Bosnia Serbia Montenegro Bulgaria Macedonia Albania Greece Romania Malta Date of preparation: June 2010 Cervarix not currently licensed

HPV 3:Settings for delivery of vaccines 12-13 HPV Catch-up program 2007-2009 12-18 12 100% 80% 84% 81% 75% 100% 80% 82% 78% 71% 60% 60% 40% 40% 20% 20% 0% 0% Julia ML B et al.: Commun Dis Intel. 32, 457-461, 2008

HPV 2 Funding / 1:Recommendation 3:Settings for delivery of vaccines Guideline Recommendation 4:Education / awareness

% % http://xbrand.yahoo.co.jp/magazine/biteki/2567/1.html

HPV CIN Ex. Victorian Cytology Service HPV 16/18, replacement) HPV CIN, 2

1. Konno R, Tamura S, Yoshikawa H.et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus 16/18 AS04- adjuvanted vaccine in Japanese women aged 20 to 25 years: interim analysis of a phase 2 double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 20(3):404-10. 2. Konno R, Tamura S, Yoshikawa H.et al. Efficacy of Human Papillomavirus Type 16/18 AS04-Adjuvanted Vaccine in Japanese Women Aged 20 to 25 Years: Final Analysis of a Phase 2 Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 20(5):847-55. 3. Konno R, Tamura S, Yoshikawa H.et al. Immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of human papillomavirus 16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in Japanese women: interim analysis of a phase II, double-blind, randomized controlled trial at month 7. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009 9(5):905-11. 4. Konno R, Sasagawa T, Fukuda T,et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of prophylactic cervical cancer vaccination in Japanese women. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010 20(3):385-92. 5. Garland SM, Goldie SJ, Konno R, et al. Recommendations for cervical cancer prevention in Asia Pacific. Vaccine. 2008 26 Suppl 12:M89-98. 6. Konno R, Shin HR, Kim YT, et al. Human papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer prevention in Japan and Korea. Vaccine. 2008 26 Suppl 12:M30-42. 7. Garland SM, Park SN, Konno R, et al. The need for public education on HPV and cervical cancer prevention in Asia. Opinions of experts at the AOGIN conference. Vaccine. 2008 26(43):5435-40. Konno R, Sato S, Yajima A. Progression of squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix from cervical intraepithelial neoplasia infected with human papillomavirus: a retrospective follow-up study by in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1992 11(2):105-12.