蝨ー蝓溯・豐サ縺ィ繧ウ繝溘Η繝九ユ繧」蠖「謌舌↓髢「縺吶k螳滓・隱ソ譟サ・域擲莠ャ迚茨シ峨€仙悸邵ョ縺ェ縺励€・indd

Similar documents
日本人英語学習者の動機付け―JGSS-2003のデータ分析を通して―

日本人英語使用者の特徴と英語能力-JGSS-2002 とJGSS-2006 のデータから-


ODA NGO NGO JICA JICA NGO JICA JBIC SCP

Vol.2.indb

) ,

日本看護管理学会誌15-2

DOUSHISYA-sports_R12339(高解像度).pdf

Admissions Assistance Office

,,.,,.,..,.,,,.,, Aldous,.,,.,,.,,, NPO,,.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,..,,,,.,

CA HP,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,


49148

Core Ethics Vol.

46

I II

Vol. 5, 29 39, 2016 Good/Virtue actions for competitive sports athlete Actions and Choices that receive praise Yo Sato Abstract: This paper focuses on


Kyushu Communication Studies 第2号

学位研究17号

untitled

Kyoto University * Filipino Students in Japan and International Relations in the 1930s: An Aspect of Soft Power Policies in Imperial Japan

<8ED089EF8B D312D30914F95742E696E6464>

7 2000b 2000b 2000b A Vol 8, No 2,



10-渡部芳栄.indd



テレビ番組による相互交流

untitled


HP


’ÓŠ¹/‰´„û

02 比較教育社会学.indd

Vol.3.indb

The Journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Administration and Policies Vol 7, No 2, pp 19 _ 30, 2004 Survey on Counseling Services Performed by Nursi

3_23.dvi

220 28;29) 30 35) 26;27) % 8.0% 9 36) 8) 14) 37) O O 13 2 E S % % 2 6 1fl 2fl 3fl 3 4

所得の水準とばらつきの時系列的推移について-JGSSと政府統計の比較-

:. SPSS


日本人の子育て観-JGSS-2008 データに見る社会の育児能力に対する評価-

<4D F736F F D2094AD92428CA48B CB B4C92C789C1816A462E646F63>

56

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

NINJAL Research Papers No.8

大学における原価計算教育の現状と課題

”Y‰Æ”ЛïŸ_‘W40−ª3/ ’¼„´

Ⅱ. 用語の操作的定義 Ⅲ. 対象と方法 1. 対象 WAM NET 2. 調査期間 : 3. 調査方法 4. 調査内容 5. 分析方法 FisherMann-Whitney U Kruskal-Wallis SPSS. for Windows 6. 倫理的配慮 Vol. No.

OJT Planned Happenstance

APUにおける国際化と課題

.D.q


〈論文〉英語学習辞書における二重母音と三重母音の発音表記の異同


11_土居美有紀_様.indd

untitled

18巻2号_09孫さま03p.indd

先端社会研究 ★5★号/4.山崎

.,,,.,,,,,.,,,, Inoue,.,,,,.,.,,.,,,.,.,,,.,,,,,.,,.,,.,,,.,,,,

P

1 [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15] The Boston Public Schools system, BPS (Deferred Acceptance system, DA) (Top Trading Cycles system, TTC) cf. [13] [

<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

KII, Masanobu Vol.7 No Spring



Powered by TCPDF ( Title 米国における障害者を対象とした野外教育 : 米国の障害者政策と障害者教育の変遷との関連 Sub Title Outdoor education for people with disabilities in United

9 1, , , 2002, 1998, 1988,



...Q.....\1_4.ai

Yamagata Journal of Health Sciences, Vol. 16, 2013 Tamio KEITOKU 1 2 Katsuko TANNO 3 Kiyoko ARIMA 4 Noboru CHIBA 1 Abstract The present study aimed to

PDF用-表紙.pdf

評論・社会科学 84号(よこ)(P)/3.金子


FC741E2_091201

Elmore & Pohlmann Greenwood & Ramagli a b c a b c

_Y05…X…`…‘…“†[…h…•

⑥中村 哲也(他).indd

”Лï−wŁfl‰IŠv‚æ84“ƒ/”RŸH‘�ŁF

Otto Friedrich Bollnow,~

<8D918DDB926E88E68CA48B86985F8F572D8D8791CC2E696E6462>

Highlights Employment increased in Ontario, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba. There was little change in the other provinces. More people were employed in c

07_伊藤由香_様.indd

DAY )

先端社会研究所紀要 第11号☆/3.李

07_太田美帆.indd

評論・社会科学 97号(P)☆/3.郭

外国文学論集14号.indd

Microsoft Word doc

NGO HIV HIV 8, ,378 1,078 1,331 2,409 9,749 2,038 11,787 2, , ,118 2,344 1,352 3, , ,

A pp CALL College Life CD-ROM Development of CD-ROM English Teaching Materials, College Life Series, for Improving English Communica

Core Ethics Vol.

SPA H&M ZARA ZARA ZARA DHL Door-to-door 2

DI DI


1., 1 COOKPAD 2, Web.,,,,,,.,, [1]., 5.,, [2].,,.,.,, 5, [3].,,,.,, [4], 33,.,,.,,.. 2.,, 3.., 4., 5., ,. 1.,,., 2.,. 1,,

05総福研-06_寳田.indd

Transcription:

1 1 2 3 3 1 3 2 4 5 6 7 8 8 1 8 2 1 2 2014 10 10 2014 10 20

1 2008 7 30 6 30 2020 30 2 2002 IT IT 2000 2005 IT 3 2008 JASSO, 20122012 37,989 7,910 22.2 3 4,684 13.2 4,092 11.5 12,594 35.4 6 2008 9,684 30.62010 6,063 28.2 2 3

2 4 5 6 7 2 2 30 2008 2009 5 48.7 7 2013 2011 28 2012

30 2011 2007 12 2011 37 28 265 ROOT 4 2008 20 20 40 2012

2011 3

2 4 1 2 3 4 3 1 5 3 211 5 2 2 1 2 1000 772 634 6 77.2 63.4 1 1 4 51.1 21 17 28

91/145/200 45.5 171/175/200 85.5 118/134/200 59.0 148/154/200 74.0 106/164/200 53.0 634/772/1000 63.4 72/72/100 72.0 706/844/1100 64.2 1 3 7 90 N 1, N 2, J-TEST 338 Collage English Test : CET 6 4 TOEFL-iBT, IETLS 3 2 1 100 72 72.0 1 3 2 16.7 23 18 32 22.2 72.2 62 N1, N2 34 TOEIC, TOEFL 2006 2013 7 2011 9 16.7 4 Q16 Q18 Q15 Q17 2 19

2 3 2 5 7 3 9 4 2 5 4

4 5 5 9 2 5 6 5 2 2

6 7 7 1 8 5 8 5 2

8 9 9 1 4 10 4 1 3 7 3 1

10 11 11 3 6 5 2 12 1 4 137

12 13 14 14

15 16 15 16 17 18

17 18 19 19

5 20 134 18.9 35 48.6 10 13.9 6 89 14.0 A B 21 B 7 8 22 8 39.6 109 70 39 65 30 35 44 40 4 703 631 72 69 59 10 594 561 33 326 314 12 152 142 10 20

21 22 27.1 22.2 7 3 16.712.5 30.3 29.2 13.9 35 48.6 16.7 634 274 43.2 30 4.7 327 51.6 274 180 65.7 29 10.6 59 21.5

23 n 561 24 n 70 3 85.4 561 23 56.0 10.5 25.3 70 24 30 42.9 40 57.1 72 19 26.4 24 33.329 40.3 19 7 36.8

25 n 33 26 n 39 12 63.3 33 2536.4 30.3 30.3 39 26 35 89.7 4 10.3

6 3 1 2 3 4 2

7 30

30

2013 JASSO 2008 5 1 123,829 180 6 ROOT ROOT 21 100 1991 1993 112 8 1 1 2008 4, pp.29 42 2 2011 56 57, pp.1 37 3 2011 Vol.12 1 pp.141 146 4 2008 No.42 5 2009 No.57 6 2011 60 pp.73 82 7 Lee Kyu Yong Bae Kiu Sik 2010 No.80 8 2011 Vol.12 1 pp.67 73

9 2008 102009 90 pp.153 173 11 2013 No.112 122008 2013 132012 102 pp.39 67 142010 Vol.50, No.1 2, pp.129 146 15 2005 10 6, pp.41 44 16 2010 30 Vol.13, No.2, pp.40 52 17 2012 3 1 pp.1 34 182012 30, pp.45 51 19 2011 8 8 1 113 17.8 131 20.7 34 5.4 4 0.6 148 23.3 1 0.2 1 0.2 26 4.1 1 0.2 1 0.2 106 16.7 1 0.2 55 8.7 8 1.3 1 0.2 1 0.2 2 0.3 634 100.0 CGA 4 0.6 2 0.3 1 0.2 20 3.2 29 4.6 7 1.1 6 0.9 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 30 4.7 28 4.4 6 0.9 1 0.2 27 4.3 4 0.6 1 0.2 1 0.2

1 0.2 3 0.5 1 0.2 51 8.0 1 0.2 2 0.3 2 0.3 5 0.8 114 18.0 1 0.2 2 0.3 1 0.2 1 0.2 13 2.1 1 0.2 2 0.3 5 0.8 1 0.2 1 0.2 3 0.5 2 0.3 3 0.5 2 0.3 7 1.1 5 0.8 1 0.2 3 0.5 1 0.2 6 0.9 44 6.9 66 10.4 11 1.7 2 0.3 28 4.4 18 2.8 1 0.2 1 0.2 2 0.3 1 0.2 1 0.2 1 0.2 7 1.1 4 0.6 1 0.2 32 5.0 7 1.1 3 0.5 634 100.0 1 52 8.2 1 1 0.2 2 79 12.5 2 16 2.5 3 134 21.1 3 7 1.1 4 324 51.1 20 3.2 5 1 0.2 634 100.0 17 2 0.3 23 34 5.4 18 19 3.0 24 15 2.4 19 42 6.6 25 16 2.5 20 109 17.2 26 1 0.2 21 208 32.8 28 1 0.2 22 153 24.1 34 5.4 634 100.0 37 5.8 6 0.9 2 0.3 5 0.8 11 1.7 6 0.9 1 0.2 36 5.7 4 0.6 43 6.8 13 2.1 22 3.5 17 2.7 17 2.7 9 1.4 12 1.9 21 3.3 43 6.8 12 1.9 12 1.9 9 1.4

13 2.1 7 1.1 37 5.8 20 3.2 196 30.9 3 0.5 5 0.8 6 0.9 6 0.9 1 0.2 2 0.3 634 100.0 272 42.9 111 17.5 251 39.6 634 100.0 n 634 90 14.2 544 85.8 338 53.3 296 46.7 8 1.3 626 98.7 Q1 2014 3 12 1.9 2015 7 1 0.2 2016 8 1 0.2 2014 4 3 0.5 2015 9 2 0.3 2016 9 2 0.3 2014 6 331 52.2 2016 3 1 0.2 2017 6 40 6.3 2014 7 7 1.1 2016 5 1 0.2 2017 7 3 0.5 2014 9 1 0.2 2016 6 61 9.6 16 2.6 2015 3 6 0.9 2016 7 7 1.1 634 100.0 Q2 243 38.3 3 0.2 388 61.2 634 100.0 Q3 74 11.7 5 0.6 556 87.7 634 100.0 Q4 284 44.8 2 0.3 348 54.9 634 100.0

Q5 429 67.7 4 0.6 201 31.7 634 100.0 Q6 n 634 66 10.4 37 5.8 168 26.5 10 1.6 62 9.8 370 58.4 Q7 n 634 76 12 62 9.8 172 27.1 115 18.1 42 6.6 475 74.9 140 22.1 25 3.9 Q8 1 25 194 30.6 51 75 86 13.6 101 177 27.9 26 50 101 15.9 76 100 57 9.0 16 2.5 634 100.0 Q9 280 44.2 4 0.7 350 55.2 634 100.0 Q10 229 36.6 80 14.7 4 0.6 58 9.2 263 41.5 634 100.0 Q11 113 17.8 6 1 515 81.2 634 100.0

Q12 n 634 418 65.9 142 22.4 211 33.3 137 21.6 148 23.3 74 11.7 156 24.6 62 9.8 233 36.8 27 4.3 Q13 63 9.9 131 20.7 55 8.7 314 49.5 67 10.6 2 0.3 634 100.0 Q14 n 634 139 21.9 240 37.9 152 24.0 243 38.3 172 27.1 261 41.2 174 27.4 313 49.4 201 31.7 10 1.6 224 35.3 Q15 n 634 316 49.8 179 28.2 107 16.9 8 1.3 24 3.8 322 50.8 189 29.8 83 13.1 12 1.9 27 4.3 123 19.4 195 30.8 215 33.9 64 10.1 36 5.7 202 31.9 214 33.8 168 26.5 25 3.9 24 3.8 105 16.6 142 22.4 272 42.9 71 11.2 44 6.9 310 48.9 152 24 136 21.5 16 2.5 20 3.2 Q16 Q18 2 19 Q19 2013 3 29 4.6 1 0.2 604 95.3 634 100.0

Q20 2013 3 28 4.4 1 0.2 605 95.4 634 100.0 Q21 2012 344 54.3 1 0.2 289 45.6 634 100.0 Q22 216 34.1 1 0.2 417 65.8 634 100 Q23 n 634 161 25.4 198 31.2 107 16.9 179 28.2 56 8.8 141 22.2 12 1.9 Q24 n 634 120 18.9 278 43.8 126 19.8 81 12.8 32 5.0 85 13.4 34 5.4 23 3.6 Q25 2 A B A 33 5.2 B 61 9.6 A 166 26.2 17 2.7 B 357 56.3 634 100.0 Q26 274 43.2 327 51.6 30 4.7 3 0.5 634 100.0

Q27 180 65.7 29 10.6 59 21.5 3 1.1 274 100.0 Q28 n 274 30 10.9 85 31.0 89 32.5 92 33.6 39 14.2 45 16.4 8 2.9 1 0.4 Q29 234 85.4 40 14.6 274 100.0 Q30 n 561 351 55.4 210 33.1 79 12.5 136 21.5 117 18.5 139 21.9 171 27.0 210 33.1 128 20.2 8 1.3 Q31 314 56.0 59 10.5 142 25.3 46 8.2 561 100.0 Q32 n 70 28 4.4 6 0.9 15 2.4 14 2.2 23 3.6 17 2.7 20 3.2 3 0.5 26 4.1 6 0.9

Q33 30 42.9 40 57.1 70 100.0 Q34 518 81.7 22 3.5 94 14.8 634 100.0 Q35 n 634 251 39.6 124 19.6 172 27.1 141 22.2 121 19.1 107 16.9 8 2 1 1.4 11 15.3 3 4.2 4 5.6 1 1.4 39 54.2 10 13.9 3 4.2 72 100.0 10 13.9 10 13.9 1 1.4 13 18.1 11 15.3 1 1.4 5 6.9 7 9.7 1 1.4 1 1.4 1 1.4 4 5.6 3 4.2 1 1.4 3 4.2 72 100.0 1 1.4 6 8.3 1 1.4 4 5.6 3 4.2 1 1.4 1 1.4 1 1.4 1 1.4 3 4.2 16 22.2 3 4.2 4 5.6 4 5.6 2 2.8 2 2.8 1 1.4 1 1.4 4 5.6 8 11.1 2 2.8 1 1.4 2 2.8 72 100.0

1 17 23.6 4 3 4.2 5 1 1.4 2 11 15.3 1 12 16.7 4 5.6 3 12 16.7 2 12 16.7 72 100.0 18 1 1.4 23 16 22.2 28 2 2.8 19 1 1.4 24 14 19.4 29 1 1.4 20 7 9.7 25 11 15.3 30 1 1.4 21 7 9.7 26 4 5.6 32 1 1.4 22 3 4.2 27 3 4.2 72 100.0 17 23.6 3 4.2 52 72.2 72 100.0 n 72 N 1 46 64.2 N2 5 6.9 J-TEST 1 1.4 8 11.2 2 2.8 10 13.9 n 72 CET-4 2 2.8 TOEIC 24 33.6 TOEFL 8 11.2 38 52.8 Q1 n 72 6 8.3 10 13.9 9 12.5 26 36.1 18 25.0 27 37.5 11 15.3 5 6.9

Q2 n 72 2006 3 1 1.4 2010 7 1 1.4 2012 3 7 9.7 2008 10 1 1.4 2010 9 8 11.1 2012 7 3 4.2 2008 3 2 2.8 2011 3 8 11.1 2012 9 1 1.4 2009 10 1 1.4 2011 4 1 1.4 2013 3 1 1.4 2009 3 5 6.9 2011 5 1 1.4 2013 9 1 1.4 2009 9 6 8.3 2011 8 3 4.2 72 100.0 2010 3 9 12.5 2011 9 12 16.7 Q3 n 72 57 79.2 33 45.8 52 72.2 1 1.4 Q4 4 5.6 27 37.5 37 51.4 4 5.6 72 100.0 Q5 55 76.4 17 23.6 72 100.0 Q6 8 11.1 56 77.8 8 11.1 72 100.0 Q7 n 16 3 18.8 3 18.8 4 25.0 6 37.5 0 0.0 1 6.3 2 12.5

Q8 n 72 3 4.2 16 22.2 2 2.8 12 16.7 47 65.3 Q9 n 72 10 13.9 14 19.4 45 62.5 24 33.3 6 8.3 14 19.4 Q10 n 72 5 6.9 3 4.2 28 38.9 18 25.0 20 27.8 32 44.4 18 25.0 47 65.3 6 8.3 1 1.4 Q11 15 20.8 57 79.2 72 100.0 Q12 16 22.2 56 77.8 72 100.0 Q13 2 2.8 70 97.2 72 100.0 Q14 28 38.9 18 25.0 26 36.1 72 100.0

Q15 Q17 2 19 Q18 2013 3 14 19.4 58 80.6 72 100.0 Q19 2013 3 12 16.7 60 83.3 72 100.0 Q20 2012 10 13.9 62 86.1 72 100.0 Q21 28 38.9 44 61.1 72 100.0 Q22 12 16.7 4 5.6 25 34.7 2 2.8 27 37.5 2 2.8 72 100.0 Q23 16 22.2 10 13.9 19 26.4 2 2.8 18 25 5 6.9 2 2.8 72 100.0 Q24 27 37.5 45 62.5 72 100.0

Q25 2 A B A 3 4.2 B 40 55.6 A 10 13.9 B 19 26.4 72 100.0 Q26 6 8.3 34 47.2 32 44.4 72 100 Q27 n 6 1 1.4 1 1.4 1 1.4 2 2.8 1 1.4 1 1.4 5 6.9 2 2.8 4 5.6 Q28 1 16.7 5 83.3 6 100.0 Q29 19 26.4 24 33.3 29 40.3 72 100.0 Q30 7 36.8 12 63.2 19 100.0 Q31 2 10.5 4 21.1 3 15.8 10 52.6 19 100.0

Q32 9 47.4 10 52.6 19 100.0 Q33 n 33 5 15.2 11 33.3 6 18.2 19 57.6 11 33.3 30 90.9 11 33.3 Q34 12 36.4 10 30.3 10 30.3 1 3.0 33 100.0 Q35 n 39 22 56.4 2 5.1 19 48.7 15 38.5 17 43.6 14 35.9 18 46.2 2 5.1 13 33.3 2 5.1 Q36 35 89.7 4 10.3 39 100.0 Q37 51 70.8 9 12.5 12 16.7 72 100.0 Q38 23 30.3 6 8.3 21 29.2 10 13.9 6 8.3 6 8.3 72 100.0

The Perspective of Chinese Students towards Japanese Companies and Their Employment Consciousness : From Comparison with the Local Chinese Student and Resident Foreign Student Zhenzhong Huang and Junko Urasaka Scholars argue that Japanese companies have failed to efficiently use highly-skilled non- Japanese international students. Their research suggests a gap between the talent development policies of Japanese companies and the career plans of non-japanese students in Japan and points to the need for improving the government and practical use of qualified international students in Japanese companies. As Japanese companies globalize and continue to expand overseas, these companies must also begin hiring international workers who have not studied in Japan. This research, using surveys of Chinese students both in Japan and China, focuses on the perspective of Chinese students towards Japanese companies in the context of Japanese hiring practices. The results of the surveys show significant differences between the image of Japanese companies held by Chinese students in Japan and students in China. Although neither group expressed a strong desire to work for Japanese companies, preferring instead Western or Chinese companies, Chinese students in Japan held a more favorable image of Japanese companies. To increase the number of highly-skilled international personnel in Japanese companies, this research highlights the need for Japanese companies to make the adjustments needed to hire and effectively use those students who are more favorably disposed to Japanese companies. Key words : Chinese college students, Employment consciousness, Japanese companies, International students in japan, Highly-skilled human resources