56
55 8.52010 1000 3500 2000 2000140 1902 1993 1953 2011 20012010 55 2008:99 1
4 1995 12 1949 1984 3 55 2008 1 2
3 3 1 2 3 123 19961998a1998b2001 19961998a1998b 2001 600 420 1947 2 2010 2 2.470 422 17 1953 8 1954 11
2008:215 2 1 3 17% 2011 9 4 6 1 3
3 3 363 SPSS 2003209 SERT
2 1012 1
1 40% 59.8 40.2 40 27.2 25.7 20 40% t 1 n=203-0.30 1.351 n=140-0.90 1.282 4.123 ** 341 n=202-0.14 1.133 n=139-0.22 1.295.569 270.192 n=201 0.04 1.414 n=141-0.14 1.543 1.109 284.434 n=202-0.44 1.319 n=141-0.57 1.400.902 341-2-10 12 *5% **1%
0 t=4,123df=341p.01 54321 2 51.4% 59.8
25 35 50% 37.9 10% t 2
n=205 3.78 1.041 n=144 3.47 1.051 2.770 ** 306.206 n=203 3.91 1.174 n=143 4.06 1.149-1.138 344 n=201 3.39 1.249 n=141 3.45 1.268-0.441 340 n=202 3.15 1.269 n=140 3.44 1.282-2.050 * 340 54321 *5% **1% t=-2.050df=340p.05 t=2.770df=344p.01 199623 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 5
5 1996232-2,-1,0,1,2 3
68.9 86.3 48.5 20 76.3 10 10 34.8 44.7 24.3 47.5 4
74.3 13.3 87.7 55.8 80.7 29.3 25.1 24.5 5
5 t 3 3 t=3.731df=360.770 p<.01t=4.154df=360.954p<.01t=3.553 df=354p<.01t=3.101df=359.954p<.01 t=2.866df=351.947p<.01t=3.159df=353p<.01
n=213-1.36.978 n=150-1.69.706 3.731 ** 360.770 n=213-1.03 1.032 n=150-1.41.734 4.154 ** 360.954 n=207 -.29 1.179 n=149 -.72 1.114 3.553 ** 354 n=212-1.43 1.016 n=150-1.71.727 3.101 ** 359.954 n=212-1.23.921 n=150-1.48.757 2.866 ** 351.947 n=206 -.29 1.207 n=149 -.70 1.184 3.159 ** 353-2 -1 0 1 2 *5% **1% -2,-1,0,1,2
7 39.7 15.4 8 15.7 34.9 38.2 38.2 50 7 53.9 4.4 9.7
42.2 32.8 75 37 52.4 10 8 8
t 4 t=2.338df=361p<.05 t=4.189df=359p<.01t=4.359df=357p<.01 t=-5.468df=299.018p<.01t=-4.814df=358 p<.01 n=213.51 1.123 n=150.22 1.192 2.338 * 361 n=211-1.18.984 n=150 -.57 1.096-5.468 ** 299.018 n=211 -.45.996 n=150 -.89.956 4.189 ** 359 n=211.77.913 n=149.60 1.132 1.504 274.419 n=211-1.15.954 n=149 -.64 1.027-4.814 ** 358 n=210 -.46 1.031 n=149 -.93.966 4.359 ** 357-2 -10 12 *5% **1%
t 1985 a b c d 9
3.37 3.31 t 5 n=212 2.70 1.003 n=149 2.20.854 5.107 ** 345.970 n=212 3.29.720 n=148 3.48.704-2.511 ** 358 n=213 3.15.814 n=148 3.11.748 0.451 332.382 432 1 *5% **1% t=5.107df=345.970p<.01 t=-2.511 df=358p<.01
20
Review of educational research
Ethnic minority education in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Province of China: Survey of bilingual abilities and language usage in Mongolian children Wuriga Keywords: Ethnic minorities, Mongolian, Chinese, bilingual abilities, Language Use Abstract In this paper, we focus on bilingual education of Mongolian and Chinese in the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Province, China. We obtained the features of the bilingual abilities and bilinguality for Mongolian students from elementary school and Junior high school by the questionnaire. Through the results of the questionnaire, firstly, we found that the self-assessment of the four skills in Mongolian was better than those in Chinese for these students. And secondly, the four skills for these Mongolian students were a little worse compared to that of the Han group. Furthermore, the using frequency in Chinese for family members in home life is in the order of grandparents < parents < siblings. And, in school life, the using frequency is in the order of teachers < classmates. Namely, the using frequency increases for the younger generation. Finally, although the students have opportunities to use both of the languages in community, they have no chance to communicate with the Han children because there are no Han people in ethnic school.