J-LEAGUE 8000 V.Kawasaki Urawa.R 5000 J-LEAGUE

Similar documents

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

Law and Economics Review vol.4,no.1(february 2009) 1998

4.9 Hausman Test Time Fixed Effects Model vs Time Random Effects Model Two-way Fixed Effects Model


05_藤田先生_責

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

2007年度 修士論文

ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-

4 2 p = p(t, g) (1) r = r(t, g) (2) p r t g p r dp dt = p dg t + p g (3) dt dr dt = r dg t + r g dt 3 p t p g dt p t r t = Benefit view dp

日本内科学会雑誌第102巻第4号

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

本文/目次(裏白)

Ł\”ƒ-2005

第90回日本感染症学会学術講演会抄録(I)

Ishi

オーストラリア研究紀要 36号(P)☆/3.橋本

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

udc-2.dvi

..,,...,..,...,,.,....,,,.,.,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,,.,,,.,,,,.,,, Becker., Becker,,,,,, Becker,.,,,,.,,.,.,,

「スウェーデン企業におけるワーク・ライフ・バランス調査 」報告書

DP

161 J 1 J 1997 FC 1998 J J J J J2 J1 J2 J1 J2 J1 J J1 J1 J J 2011 FIFA 2012 J 40 56

DOUSHISYA-sports_R12339(高解像度).pdf

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ

The effect of tax rate and deduction in income taxation In Japan, numerous attempts have been made to reform the income taxation system. Researchers h

FA FA FA FA FA 5 FA FA 9

2 94



A5 PDF.pwd

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

dvi

「リストラ中高年」の行方

Autumn II III Zon and Muysken 2005 Zon and Muysken 2005 IV II 障害者への所得移転の経済効果 分析に用いるデータ

7 success of the creation of Soccer town in Urawa is mainly due to strong recognition and identity by local people as the Soccer town in Urawa distric


社会システム研究21_ 畠山.indd

ISSN ISBN C3033 The Institute for Economic Studies Seijo University , Seijo, Setagaya Tokyo , Japan

浜松医科大学紀要

Human Welfare 8‐1☆/4.坂口

研修コーナー

パーキンソン病治療ガイドライン2002

A Study on Throw Simulation for Baseball Pitching Machine with Rollers and Its Optimization Shinobu SAKAI*5, Yuichiro KITAGAWA, Ryo KANAI and Juhachi

2 251 Barrera, 1986; Barrera, e.g., Gottlieb, 1985 Wethington & Kessler 1986 r Cohen & Wills,

tnbp59-21_Web:P2/ky132379509610002944

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

...

日本内科学会雑誌第97巻第7号

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

日本内科学会雑誌第98巻第4号

NODERA, K.*, TANAKA, Y.**, RAFAEL, F.*** and MIYAZAKI, Y.**** : Relationship between rate of success and distance of shooting on fade-away shoot in fe

) ,

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)


16_.....E...._.I.v2006

抄録/抄録1    (1)V


CHUO UNIVERSITY 3

- June 0 0




yasi10.dvi

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

8y4...l

untitled

Vol.8 No (July 2015) 2/ [3] stratification / *1 2 J-REIT *2 *1 *2 J-REIT % J-REIT J-REIT 6 J-REIT J-REIT 10 J-REIT *3 J-


untitled

01.Œk’ì/“²fi¡*

2 / 24

<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>


表紙_目次.PDF

FA

24 Depth scaling of binocular stereopsis by observer s own movements

( β K ) p β W W p β K K aβ β W W β β K K ) 1/(βW +β K ) 3 ln C =lnα + 1 β W + β K ln Q (3) 1/(β W + β K ) ( β W + β K ) 4 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( 1998

Vol. 48 No. 3 Mar PM PM PMBOK PM PM PM PM PM A Proposal and Its Demonstration of Developing System for Project Managers through University-Indus

行動経済学 第5巻 (2012)

Q [4] 2. [3] [5] ϵ- Q Q CO CO [4] Q Q [1] i = X ln n i + C (1) n i i n n i i i n i = n X i i C exploration exploitation [4] Q Q Q ϵ 1 ϵ 3. [3] [5] [4]

St. Andrew's University NII-Electronic Library Service

抜刷表紙/芦塚 〃 嶋崎 芦塚


橡商学部提出用 A4 涌田.PDF

Preliminary Version Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Me

74-2 岩間

ñ{ï 01-65

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓

M&A Brav et al.(2005) TOPIX Core30 4 TOPIX Core

23_02.dvi

Visual Evaluation of Polka-dot Patterns Yoojin LEE and Nobuko NARUSE * Granduate School of Bunka Women's University, and * Faculty of Fashion Science,

昭和恐慌期における長野県下農業・農村と産業組合の展開過程

Public Pension and Immigration The Effects of Immigration on Welfare Inequality The immigration of unskilled workers has been analyzed by a considerab

NIES ASEAN4.. NIES.....EU.. ASEAN4 NIES

Acrobat Distiller, Job 2

,398 4% 017,

Transcription:

The Demand for J-League with Fixed Effect Tobit Model: Effects toward Community Formation Tomonori Ito and Yoichiro Higuchi The J-League was established in 993 expecting to encourage the community to form its "comprehensive sport club." For verifying the J-League s effect, it is very meaningful to econometrically analyze the attendance demand for J-League matches. This study proposed the football attendance model, which considers the demand that exceeded a stadium capacity, with panel data analysis. We had three hypotheses. First, examining hypothesis() that the structure of demand for football attendance changed between 996 and 997, we found that it changed significantly. Secondly, hypothesis() that supporters decided their attendance on the basis of attributions of away clubs and games themselves after the structural change and we examined hypothesis(3) that supporters decided their attendance on the basis of attributions of home clubs before the structural change. As a result we proved that the J-League helped the development of the community through the hometown sports last eight s. KeywordsDemand for football, Panel analysis, Tobit - W J-LEAGUE 993 J-LEAGUE J-LEAGUE J-LEAGUE J-LEAGUE (Tokyo Institute of Technology) (Tokyo Institute of Technology)

J-LEAGUE 8000 V.Kawasaki 993 6000 Urawa.R 5000 J-LEAGUE 0 4000 000 8 0000 0 8000 8 7 6000 4000 000 0000 8000 6000 -- 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 000 00 99300 00 969 --V -- 993 5000 995 J-LEAGUE 000 Division- -3 - J-LEAGUE - 00 W W - W - -3-4 -5 60000 0000 3 3- Tobit-Model 3-3-3 4 J-LEAGUE 4-4- - 4-3 4-4 5 J-LEAGUE 993 000 attendance per match

3 - -- Simmons[996] -- Dobson & Goddard[998] Dobson & Goddard[998] - -- Walker[986] Dobson & Goddard[99] -- Cairns[987] -3

y Bird[98] -4 Cairns[987] x Dobson & Goddard[99] -5- ( ) Peel & Tobit-Model Thomas[988] Tobit-Model Tobit-Model ( ) (3--) 5 95 y = α + βx + ε ε ~ N ( 0, σ ) (3--) (50 ) -5 y y capacity -5- y = capacity y capacity (3--) -5- -5- y = y y < capacity (3--3) -5- µ σ y ~ N ( µ, σ ) (3--) Prob( y = capacity) = Prob( y capacity) J-LEAGUE capacity µ (3--4) = Φ σ (3--3) Prob( y = y ) = Prob( y < capacity) 3 capacity µ (3--5) 3- Tobit Model = Φ σ Φ( ) 4

(3--3) y µ f y y < capacity = φ σ σ = ( α βx) y + σ πσ e (3--6) yit yi. = yit (3--3) φ() T Fixed-Effect Model (3--4) (3--) L α ( α βx) capacity + L = Φ σ y capacity y < capacity ( α βx) σ y + e πσ y it = αi + β k xitk + ε it k= (3--7) i =,,, N t =,,, T (3--4) Random-Effect Model (3--5) Fixed-Effect capacity ( + x) Model α α β i log L = Φ = σ y capacity m ( ) ( ) y α + βx y it = αi + β k xitk + ε it + log π + logσ + k= σ i =,,, N t =,,, T (3--5) y< capacity Between Model (3--) OLS y it = α + β x + ε (3--8) (3--8) E( αi ) = 0 E( α i ) = σ α 3- E( αiα j ) = 0 ( i j) E( εit ) = 0 E( ε it ) = σ ε (3--6) 3-- E( ε itε js ) = 0 ( i j, t s) E( α iε it ) = 0 N ( T ) u it = α i + ε it ( ) E ( u it ) = 0 σα + σε ( i = j, t = s) E( uitu js ) = σ α ( i = j, t s) (3--7) 0 ( i j) 3-- E( α ) = 0 i x it (3--8) Total Model Variance-Components Model OLS (3--) 3--3 4 m F y it = α + β k xitk + ε it Hausman k= i =,,, N t =,,, T (3--) 3-- m k k= itk it i =,,, N t =,,, T (3--) m i 5

Yes No Total-Model y α + α α β β β +β Fixed Effect-Model Random Effect-Model α x 3-- 3-4- 3-3Fixed-Effect-Tobit Model α Fixed-Effect-Tobit Model α + α i t (3-3-) β β + β yit = α i + βxit + ε it it (3-3-) 4 J-LEAGUE 4-4-- 993 000 8 y it = capacity i yit capacityi (3-3-) J-LEAGUE 06 y it = y it y it < capacityi (3-3-3) 05 4-- J-LEAGUE Tobit Model J-LEAGUE Baltagi[00] (3-3-) α i β σ ε βˆ σˆε Fixed-Effect-Tobit Model (incidental parameters problem) Greene[00] Fixed-Effect-Tobit Model 3-4 90 4--3 (3-4-) 4-- y = α + βx + ε (3-4-) D ( 0 ) (3-4-) 3-4- y ε ~ N( 0, σ ) = α + α D + βx + β Dx + ε (3-4-) Dobson & Goddard[00] 6

4-- 993 000 ( V G ) 4-- 4-- 4 4-- J-LEAGUE 4--3 4 V 993 995 3 997 G 994 4 997 4- J-LEAGUE 6000 JEF.Ichihara 4000 V.Kawasaki G.Osaka 000 S.Hirosima 4--J-LEAGUE 0000 8000 4-- 993 000 J-LEAGUE 6000 J-LEAGUE 4000 3 993 7976 000 994 9598 0000 8000 4000 6000 ( )80 4000 995 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 000 69 996 3353 6000 4-- V G 997 03 998 000 6 0000 4 9000 8000 attendance per 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 000 000 0000 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 000 attendance per match league position 0 8 6 4 JEF.Ichihara V.Kawasaki G,Osaka S.Hirosima 0 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 000 4--J-LEAGUE 4--3 V G J-LEAGUE 993 996 J-LEAGUE 4--4 ( 997 000 ) 4-- 7

J-LEAGUE J-LEAGUE 6000 Kasima.A Urawa.R 4000 J-League 0000 000 attendance per 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 0000 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 000 4000 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 000 4--6 J-LEAGUE 4--4 4-3 4--5 J-LEAGUE 6000 4000 000 0000 8000 6000 3 4000 000 0000 J-LEAGUE J-LEAGUE 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 000 4--5 3 000 Division- 3 J-LEAGUE 3 J-LEAGUE 4--6 J-LEAGUE J-LEAGUE J-LEAGUE 993 994 4-4 J-LEAGUE (4-4-) Fixed-Effect-Tobit Model J-LEAGUE 996 yit J-LEAGUE - attendance per match 8 attendance per match 0000 8000 6000 4000 000

9 5 7 9 yit = α i + βkh( k) it + γ la( l) it + δom( o) it + ηrd( r) it + εit k = l= o= r= (4-4-) % 997 α i h( k )it 4-5- a ( l) it m ( o) it d ( r) it ε it 0 σ ε 4-5- y it = capacity i yit capacityi (4-4-) 4-5- 993 y it = y it y it < capacityi 996 6000 observation i t estimates 0 4000 number of full matches α i i 000 00 h( k )it 0000 80 8000 60 6000 40 4000 0 000 0 0000 a ( l) it 99 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 000 00 0 4-5- m ( o ) it 993 996 997 000 0 4-5- Fixed-Effect-Tobit Model 4-5- 993 996 0 4-5 4-5- 3 0 4-5- 996 997 50.37 % 9 attendance per match match

4-5- Fixed-Effect-Tobit Model 993 996 997 000 993 996 997 000 993 996 997 000 993 996 997 000 993 996 997 000 993 996 997 000 997 000 993 996 993 996 3 3 997 000 997 000 5 5- J-LEAGUE 996 997 ( ) 997 000 ( ) 3( ) J-LEAGUE 4-5-3 993 996 5- J-LEAGUE J-LEAGUE 0

00 W J-LEAGUE W [000] William H.Greene[000] Economic Analysis Fourth Edition,Prentice-Hall, [000] Maddala,G.S.,[99] Introduction to Econometrics[ nd ed.], ( [998] ) [00] [995]TSP [ ] Baltagi, H. [00] Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, John Wiley and Sons: New York Bird,P[983] The demand for league football, Applied Economics,v4,637-49 Cairns,J[987] Evaluating changes in league structure : the reorganization of the Scottish Football League, Applied Economics,v9,59-75 Dobson,s.m.,Goddard,J.A.[99] The demand for standing and seated viewing accommodation in the Football League, Applied Economics,v4,55-63 [995] The demand for football in the regions of England and Wales, Regional Studies,30,443-53 [998] Performance and revenue in professional league football: evidence from Granger causality tests, Applied Economics, 30, 64-5 [00] The Economics of Football, Cambridge University Press Green, W. [00] The Behavior of the Fixed Effects Estimator in Nonlinear Models, http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~wgreene/ Peel,D.A.andThomas,D.[988] Outcome uncertainty and the demand for football, Scottish Journal of Political Economy,35,4-9 Simmons,R.[996] The demand for English league football : a club level analysis, Applied Economics,8,39-55 Walker,B.[986] The demand for professional league football and the success of football league teams : some city size effects, Urban Studies,3,09-9 Wilson,P.andSim,B.[995] The demand for Semi-Pro League football in Malaysia 989-9 : a panel data approach, Applied Economics,7,3-38