橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF"

Transcription

1 ** *** * ** ***

2 (1) (2)

3 (1986) - 1 -

4 - 2 -

5 (1986) Ohtake (1991) (1993) (1994) (1996) (1997) (1997) Hayashi (1997) (1999) 60 Ohtake (1991) 86 (1996) 89 (1997) 92 (1999) 95 (1993) (1986) Hayashi (1997) 90 (1994) (1997) (1) [1994] [1997] [1999] (2) [1996] [1997] Hayashi [1997] (3) [1986] (4) Ohtake[1991] (5) [1997]

6 (1986) Ohtake (1991) (1994) (1993) (1994) Ohtake (1991) (1996) (1997) (1997) (1999) Hayashi (1997) 79 (1994) (1996) (1997) (1996) (1997) (1999) - 4 -

7

8 2 2 (1986) Hayashi (1997) (1999) Hayashi (1997) (1999) (1986) - 5 -

9 Kotlikoff and Morris (1990) 3 U U( ) U U U U U (1)

10 4 (1) (1) y y y * 1 * p + α2 yk + α3 1 ε1 (2) = α y x + y = 1 ( y * > 0) y = 0 ( y * 0) (2) y * k = β y + β x (3) 1 p (3) (2) * y = ( α 1 + α2β1) y p + α2 β2x2 + α2 x1 + ε1 (4) 4 Bernheim Shleifer and Summers (1985) - 7 -

11 * a φ( β) E[ y p y > 0] = µ p + σ0 2 (5a) a Φ( β) * a φ( β) E[ y p y 0] = µ p σ0 2 (5b) a + 1 Φ( β) 2 σ ( aσ ) 1 (6a) 0 = p + a = α + α (6b) 1 2β1 aµ β p + b = (6c) σ 0 b = α + (6d) 2β2x2 α3x1 Hayashi, Ando and Ferris (1988) (2000) (5) (6b) α + α β < ( α 1 > 0) α 2 β 1-8 -

12 (3) y * k = β 1y p + β2x2 + ε2 (7) (7) y y k k = y = 0 * k ( y ( y * * > 0) 0) (8) (2) (7) (8) Amemiya (1985) type II Tobit (7) (2) (7) Heckman (1976) (7) (2) y * = γ x + υ (9) (2) (7) (9) probit Mills Mills (7) (2) (2) probit - 9 -

13 (1) (2) (3) (4) 1 1 (5) 1 (6) (7) 2 (8)

14 - 11 -

15 Mills [7] Mills [2]

16

17

18

19

20

21 6 (1997) (1997) Ohtake (1991) 95 (1999)

22 (1) (2) 3.1 Borsch-Supan et. al. (1992) Kotlikoff and Morris (1990)

23 - 15 -

24 1 2 7 A-1 A-2 (3) y y Mulligan (1997) A-2 (7)

25

26

27 Amemiya, Takeshi (1984), Tobit Models: A Survey, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 24, Nos. 1/2, January/February, pp (1986) Bernheim, B. Douglas, Andrei Shleifer and Lawrence H. Summers (1985), The Strategic Bequest Motive, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 93, No. 6, December, pp Börsch-Supan, Axel, Vassilis Hajivassiliou, Laurence J. Kotlikoff and John N. Morris (1992), Health, Children, and Elderly Living Arrangements: A Multiperiod-Multinomial Probit Model with Unobserved Heterogeneity and Autocorrelated Errors, in David A. Wise ed., Topics in the Economics of Aging, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp (1999) 3-29 (2000) Hayashi, Fumio (1997), Understanding Saving: Evidence from the United States and Japan, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Hayashi, Fumio, Albert Ando and Richard Ferris (1988), Life Cycle and Bequest Saving: A Study of Japanese and U.S. Household Based on Data for the 1984 NSFIE and 1983 Survey of Consumer Finances, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Vol. 2, No. 4, December, pp Heckman, James J. (1976), The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models, Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Vol. 5, No. 4, Fall, pp (1994) Kotlikoff, Laurence J. and John N. Morris (1990), Why Don t the Elderly Live with Their Children? A New Look, in David A. Wise ed., Issues in the Economics of Aging, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp

28 Mulligan, Casey B. (1997), Parental Priorities and Economic Inequality, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Ohtake, Fumio (1991), Bequest Motives of Aged Households in Japan, Ricerche Economiche, Vol. 45, Nos. 2/3, April/September, pp (1996) (1997) (1993) (1997)

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC

Microsoft Word - Šv”|“Å‘I.DOC 90 ª ª * E-mailshinobu.nakagawa@boj.or.jp i ii iii iv SNA 1 70 80 2 80 90 80 80 90 1 80 90 98 6 1 1 SNA 2 1 SNA 80 1SNA 1 19931998 1 2-190 1,2 2 2-2 2-3,4 3 2-5 4 2030 2-3 3 2-15 97 20 90 2-15 9198 1.

More information

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』

遺産相続、学歴及び退職金の決定要因に関する実証分析 『家族関係、就労、退職金及び教育・資産の世代間移転に関する世帯アンケート調査』 2-1. (2-1 ) (2-2 ) (2-3 ) (Hayashi [1986]Dekle [1989]Barthold and Ito [1992] [1996]Campbell [1997] [1998]Shimono and Ishikawa [2002]Shimono and Otsuki [2006] [2008]Horioka [2009]) 1 2-1-1 2-1-1-1 8 (1.

More information

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析

日本の高齢者世帯の貯蓄行動に関する実証分析 196 2017 * ** ** 1 2 3 JEL Classification Codes D14, D15, E21 Keywords * 28 Hyun- Hoon Lee Robert Owen Kwanho Shin ** 29 196 An Empirical Analysis of the Saving Behavior of Elderly Households in Japan

More information

? * Bernheim(1991) Annuity Offset Model Keyword 6-1 Tel: Fax: *

? * Bernheim(1991) Annuity Offset Model Keyword 6-1 Tel: Fax: * Discussion Paper No. 518 2000 10 ? * Bernheim(1991) Annuity Offset Model Keyword 6-1 Tel: 06-6879-8581 Fax:06-6878-2766 E-mail: suzuki@iser.osaka-u.ac.jp * 1999 12 1 1997 1996 2000 E 1992 86 68% 1997 1

More information

Ishi

Ishi Ishi HPhttp: // www.mof.go.jp / jouhou / syuzei / siryou /.htm.. or ERTA, TRA ERTA Economic Recovery Tax Act TRA Tax Reform Act Mroz Triest Lindsey Burtless Navrati Lindsey Burtless Navrati CPS Current

More information

1 913 10301200 A B C D E F G H J K L M 1A1030 10 : 45 1A1045 11 : 00 1A1100 11 : 15 1A1115 11 : 30 1A1130 11 : 45 1A1145 12 : 00 1B1030 1B1045 1C1030

1 913 10301200 A B C D E F G H J K L M 1A1030 10 : 45 1A1045 11 : 00 1A1100 11 : 15 1A1115 11 : 30 1A1130 11 : 45 1A1145 12 : 00 1B1030 1B1045 1C1030 1 913 9001030 A B C D E F G H J K L M 9:00 1A0900 9:15 1A0915 9:30 1A0930 9:45 1A0945 10 : 00 1A1000 10 : 15 1B0900 1B0915 1B0930 1B0945 1B1000 1C0900 1C0915 1D0915 1C0930 1C0945 1C1000 1D0930 1D0945 1D1000

More information

ミクロ・データによる家計行動分析: 将来不安と予備的貯蓄

ミクロ・データによる家計行動分析: 将来不安と予備的貯蓄 subjective measures E-mailkeiko.murata@mfs.cao.go.jp subjective subjective measures Dardanoni Leland waiting option Browning and LusardiEngen and Gruber Carroll and Samwick PSIDPanel Study of Income Dynamics

More information

親からの住宅援助と親子の居住関係-JGSS-2006 データによる検討-

親からの住宅援助と親子の居住関係-JGSS-2006 データによる検討- JGSS-2006 Parental housing assistance as a determinant of parent-child proximity in Japan: Results from the JGSS-2006 Rokuro TABUCHI Faculty of Human Sciences Sophia University Exchange theory and some

More information

,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kakei/qa-1.ht

,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kakei/qa-1.ht 1, 1, 2011 4 3-28,,.,,.,.,,.,,.,,.,.,. 1., 1), 1946.,, GDP,.,,,.,,., (2008) ( NIRA ), 23,.,,, 2).,,,.,,.,,., 657-8501 2-1, E-mail: unayama@person.kobe-u.ac.jp 1) 1. 2), 1990 2 21, 1993 6 12. 3 1 1 2011

More information

フィナンシャルレビュー 第80号

フィナンシャルレビュー 第80号 March Eichner et al. Tobit Tobit Buntin and Zaslavsk Duan et al.hay and Olsen Mullahy Tobit ARMA Feenberg and Skinner French and Jones Eichner et al. Eichner et al i t m i,t Em i,t Prm i,t!prm i,t Em i,t

More information

制度の実証分析DP(鈴木)No3.PDF

制度の実証分析DP(鈴木)No3.PDF 1 1988 2005 9 * B ** 2 1988 18 1988 64 Difference in Difference Model 1.2 1.7% 1.12.5 18 3 1. 13 6 13 14 18 1 1963 1 1988 65 64 2 Natural Experiment 64 65 1988 (1984) (1984) (1987) (1987) 1989 Ito and

More information

toukei11.dvi

toukei11.dvi 2003 51 2 373 388 c 2003 2003 2 12 2003 5 14 1998 69 4 1. 1 8 11 2 2002 560 0043 1 7 374 51 2 2003 3 4 microeconometrics applied econometrics applied economic statistics 5 6 1998 30 7 1970 8 1998 69 9

More information

高齢化の経済分析.pdf

高齢化の経済分析.pdf ( 2 65 1995 14.8 2050 33.4 1 2 3 1 7 3 2 1980 3 79 4 ( (1992 1 ( 6069 8 7079 5 80 3 80 1 (1 (Sample selection bias 1 (1 1* 80 1 1 ( (1 0.628897 150.5 0.565148 17.9 0.280527 70.9 0.600129 31.5 0.339812

More information

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003

Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003 266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2

More information

第85 回日本感染症学会総会学術集会後抄録(III)

第85 回日本感染症学会総会学術集会後抄録(III) β β α α α µ µ µ µ α α α α γ αβ α γ α α γ α γ µ µ β β β β β β β β β µ β α µ µ µ β β µ µ µ µ µ µ γ γ γ γ γ γ µ α β γ β β µ µ µ µ µ β β µ β β µ α β β µ µµ β µ µ µ µ µ µ λ µ µ β µ µ µ µ µ µ µ µ

More information

Taro-修士論文.PDF

Taro-修士論文.PDF 04M3070 1953 28 1957 32 1958 33 1988 63 1989 2002 14 2003 15-1- 2001-2- 50-3- 2001 2000 12 2,693 1995 2,557 2004 1.29 WHO 2.08 1970 1) 14 2006 18 2,774 2000 10 50 59 60 10 10 19 2) 1987 62 1988 63 1 15

More information

橡DP9802.PDF

橡DP9802.PDF 21 Japan s Labor Force in the Year 2020 2020 2020 600 30 60 65 30 21 20 20 2020 2020 (1) 1 (2) (3) 1 1992 9 2025 2025 1997 1 2050 10 2050-1 - consensus estimate 21 (1995) (1997) (estimation) calibration

More information

ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-

ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証- ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.139 by May 2005 Economic and Social Research Instute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan * 400 : JEL classification: D12, E21 * 186-8603 2-1 042-580-8369 FAX 042-580-8333 1 Abstract

More information

SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因-

SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因- RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 2009 年 12 月 SNA と家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離 - 日本の貯蓄率低下の要因 - 宇南山卓 ( 神戸大学大学院経済学研究科 ) 要 旨 SNA と家計調査から計算される家計貯蓄率の乖離の原因を明らかにし 日本の貯蓄率の低下の原因を考察した

More information

Preliminary Version Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Me

Preliminary Version Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Me Preliminary Version. 600 * 14530029 12-1- Preliminary Version. 1 70 1 1997 9 1020 70 1 3 2 70 1 Manning et al. (1986) Rand Health Insurance Experiment 25 50 Manning et al. (1986) 3 Medicare Medicare Medicare

More information

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom 1) IOC Major League Baseball s MLB Blue Ribbon Panel Levin et al. 1) Yamamura and Shin, 2005 a ; 2005 b ; 2005 c communication 2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura,

More information

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題 * takeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** kawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp *** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-3 2005 3 103-8660 30 No.05-J-3 2005 3 1990 * E-mailtakeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** E-mailkawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp

More information

表紙_目次.PDF

表紙_目次.PDF JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)

More information

保障領域のニーズシフトに関する研究

保障領域のニーズシフトに関する研究 SSJDA25 June 2003 1 5 12 35 60 68 2001 2001 40 51-1 - ( - 2 - 63 12 63 12 3 12 12 Deaton and Paxon(1993,1994),Deaton(1997) - 3 - - 4 - ( ) (0,1) (1) Crosby(1987), (Own Egent) 1 1. 1.1 1.2 63 12 2. 2.1

More information

2 3 4 II. 8 10 12 14 20 8 6,000 3,695 61.6 10 6,000 3754 62.6 12 5,010 3,111 62.1 149,000558362.0 62% 4 2059 ++5 4 78.3 (2%) 2002 3 8 10,12 14 8

2 3 4 II. 8 10 12 14 20 8 6,000 3,695 61.6 10 6,000 3754 62.6 12 5,010 3,111 62.1 149,000558362.0 62% 4 2059 ++5 4 78.3 (2%) 2002 3 8 10,12 14 8 453200810 I. Dicks-Mireaux and King (1983)Hubbard (1985) Dicks-Mireaux and King (1983)Hubbard (1985)(1990)(2000) Attanasio and Brugiavini(2003), Attanasio and Rohwedder(2003) (unobservable) heterogeneity

More information

Becker 1965 Gronau a a a

Becker 1965 Gronau a a a 1 1 1 1 1 3.3 6 0.43 0.45 2 2002 Becker1965 Gronau1977 1 a 3.3 3.6 6.0 4.9 4.8 3.6 a 7.4 8.4 8.1 7.6 7.5 6.5 0.45 0.43 0.74 0.64 0.64 0.55 1995 a Vol. 42 No. 2 II III IV V VI VII 1 1998Nishioka 199820022002

More information

Attendance Demand for J-League õ Shinsuke KAWAI* and Takeo HIRATA* Abstract The purpose of this study was to clarify the variables determining the attendance in J-league matches, using the 2,699 J-league

More information

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3 Summer 08 59 I はじめに quasi market II III IV V 1 II 教育サービスにおける 準市場 1 教育サービスにおける 準市場 の意義 Education Reform Act 1988 1980 Local Education Authorities LEA Le Grand 1991 Glennerster 1991 3 1 2 3 2 60 Vol. 44

More information

4602all‘C’³flÅ

4602all‘C’³flÅ 46220097 15 21.812 5 1 1 2004 15117 2 2005 3 5 6 2005 B 1 2 3 200321.8 4 5 4 6 7 1513 4 28 152400 15 2 6000 415869.3 1562777 Repeated Cross-Section Data 2 1 2 21.8 7 23 81 7 1a 1 125 1257.230 1 1b 47 47

More information

一般演題(ポスター)

一般演題(ポスター) 6 5 13 : 00 14 : 00 A μ 13 : 00 14 : 00 A β β β 13 : 00 14 : 00 A 13 : 00 14 : 00 A 13 : 00 14 : 00 A β 13 : 00 14 : 00 A β 13 : 00 14 : 00 A 13 : 00 14 : 00 A β 13 : 00 14 : 00 A 13 : 00 14 : 00 A

More information

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦ 463420101 1. 1989, Yoshida and Rasche1990, Rasche1990, 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan1996, 1996, Sekine1998, 2001, Fujiki2002, 2003, 2004 Bahmani-Oskooee and Shabsigh1996, Amano and Wirjanto2000, Bahmani-Oskooee

More information

z.prn(Gray)

z.prn(Gray) 1. 90 2 1 1 2 Friedman[1983] Friedman ( ) Dockner[1992] closed-loop Theorem 2 Theorem 4 Dockner ( ) 31 40 2010 Kinoshita, Suzuki and Kaiser [2002] () 1) 2) () VAR 32 () Mueller[1986], Mueller ed. [1990]

More information

受賞講演要旨2012cs3

受賞講演要旨2012cs3 アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート アハ ート α β α α α α α

More information

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析

税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title Author(s) 税制改正にともなう家計の所得弾性値 : 高齢者パネルデータによる実証分析 Uemura, Toshiyuki, 上村, 敏之 ; Kitamura Takayuki, 金田, 陸幸 Citation 経済学論究, 69(4): 1-16 Issue Date 2016-3-20 URL http://hdl.handle.net/10236/14671

More information

ワールド・ワイド 10‐2(P)/3.中尾

ワールド・ワイド 10‐2(P)/3.中尾 28 1 35 35 1 2003 35 2 3 4 29 1965 1998 35 1000 5 647 1960 6 35 7 8 2 30 10 2 2. 1 2. 2 2. 3 3 3. 1 3. 2 4 2 2 2. 1 9 1 2003 1 647 10 t π macro 1 1964 1998 31 t- π macro 7.21 0.12 t 31.3610.65 R 2 0.77

More information

政治参加としての自治・町内会参加者の実証分析

政治参加としての自治・町内会参加者の実証分析 JES JES input S. Verba, N. H. Nie NPO NPO NHK R. Pekanen .... %........................................ N JES Ses Socio-economic states H. E. Brady, S. Verba, K. L. Schlozman a civic skills H. E. Brady,

More information

2 Tobin (1958) 2 limited dependent variables: LDV 2 corner solution 2 truncated censored x top coding censor from above censor from below 2 Heck

2 Tobin (1958) 2 limited dependent variables: LDV 2 corner solution 2 truncated censored x top coding censor from above censor from below 2 Heck 10 2 1 2007 4 6 25-44 57% 2017 71% 2 Heckit 6 1 2 Tobin (1958) 2 limited dependent variables: LDV 2 corner solution 2 truncated 50 50 censored x top coding censor from above censor from below 2 Heckit

More information

untitled

untitled 2 book conference 1990 2003 14 Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 M1,M2 M1 Sekine(1998) Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 1. (1989), Yoshida and Rasche(1990), Rasche(1990), 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan(1996),

More information

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate School of Economics and Institute of Economic Research

More information

日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について:アップデートと考察

日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について:アップデートと考察 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 18-J-024 2018 年 8 日本の世帯属性別貯蓄率の動向について : アップデートと考察 1 宇南 卓 ( 経済産業研究所 ) 野太郎 ( 信州 学 ) 要 旨 全国消費実態調査 家計調査 家計消費状況調査を補完的に利用することでマクロ統計と整合的な貯蓄率のデータを構築した宇南山

More information

_16_.indd

_16_.indd well-being well-being well-being Cantril Ladder well-being well-being Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale Cantril Ladder Ladder Ladder awellbeing well-being well-being Gallup World Poll World Database

More information

財政のサステナビリティと長期金利の動向

財政のサステナビリティと長期金利の動向 * nakaza-t@hoffman.cc.sophia.ac.jp ** yutaka.soejima@boj.or.jp ()*** **** munehisa.kasuya@boj.or.jp No.03-J-7 2003 10 103-8660 30 * **()******* * ** () *** **** 2003 10 (i) (ii) Keywords: government bonds,

More information

untitled

untitled [ 研究ノート ] 4% 19 19 20 1997a 20 Mitchell, 2002: 123 208 1997b; 2008 2 1960 1980 Abdel-Fadil, 1975; Hansen, 1969; Radwan & Lee, 1986 Abdel-Fadil, 1980; 85 Assaad, 1997 2 Hopkins Hopkins & Westergaard, 1998:

More information

第3章.DOC

第3章.DOC 000 Ben-Akiva and Lerman, 1985 1996 1996 4 1997 Banister, 1978; Verplanken et al., 1998 1 5 1996 3 () (I n ) 1 18 I n n P n (1) P n ( 1) = exp exp ( Vn 1 ) I n 1 ( V ) + exp µ ln exp ( V ) n1 + i= ni (3.1)

More information

JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ

JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ Title 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロファイル Author(s) 阿部, 修人 ; 稲倉, 典子 Citation Issue 2007-02-14 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/13627 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository

More information

201/扉

201/扉 Mohammad Reza SARKAR ARANI Associate Professor, Allameh Tabatabai University Visiting Research Scholar, International Research Center for Japanese Studies 200718 Mohammad Reza SARKAR ARANI Visiting Research

More information

RIETI Highlight VOL.25

RIETI Highlight VOL.25 RIETI Highlight 2009 SUMMER 25 VOL. Research Digest RIETI 2009 SUMMER VOL. 25 Highlight 1 2 3 5 8 10 12 13 14 19 ResearchDigest 20 24 28 32 36 38 40 41 42 44 45 RIETI Topics 01 CONTENTS 02 RIETI Highlight

More information

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓 CPICPI CPI CPI CPI CPI Economic Perspective Shiratsukaa Consumer Price IndexCPI CPI CPI CPI CPI Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index 1996Shiratsuka 1999bHoffmann 1998Cunningham 1996 Crawford

More information

2 / 24

2 / 24 2017 11 9 1 / 24 2 / 24 Solow, 1957 total factor productivity; TFP 5% 経済成長率の要因分解 4% 3% 2.68% 2.51% 2% 1% 0% 1.63% 1.50% 0.34% 0.42% 0.55% 0.97% 1.14% 0.86% 0.13% -0.59% -0.59% -0.09% 0.01% -1% 1970-80

More information

商学 63‐3☆/4.佐々木

商学 63‐3☆/4.佐々木 157 1 2 1 158 1 1 1996 1999 3 1 1 2 3 2/3 1 2/3 1999 159 2 2 3 4 5 1 19991969 160 1 1970 1 1971 1 2 1 200120032004 2 20052006 2001 200420032005 2006 1 19811996 1999200420052005 2005 1999 2005 161 1999

More information

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程 1991 2003 GDP....................................... http://www.stat.go.jp/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ GDP http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/ GDP - - - inflation targeting Krugman a IS-LM liquidity trap Krugman b Krugman

More information

20/September/ (2007) (2007) Berger- ( 2000) Cinii 8 Sociological Abstracts relative deprivation ) *1 (2007) *2 2 4 δ Boudon-Kosaka

20/September/ (2007) (2007) Berger- ( 2000) Cinii 8 Sociological Abstracts relative deprivation ) *1 (2007) *2 2 4 δ Boudon-Kosaka 20/September/2009 1 (2007) (2007) Berger- ( 2000) Cinii 8 Sociological Abstracts relative deprivation 98 2009 9 11 ) *1 (2007) *2 2 4 δ Boudon-Kosaka (Kosaka 1986) Boudon-Kosaka- ) 1 1 3 Boudon-Kosaka

More information

C. R. McKenzie 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment group 1

C. R. McKenzie 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment group 1 KEIO UNIVERSITY MARKET QUALITY RESEARCH PROJECT (A 21 st Century Center of Excellence Project) DP2005-020 * C. R. McKenzie** 2003 3 2004 ( 38 ) 2 2004 2005 (Keio Household Panel Survey) control group treatment

More information

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書

自殺の経済社会的要因に関する調査研究報告書 17 1 2 3 4 5 11 16 30,247 17 18 21,024 +2.0 6 12 13 WHO 100 14 7 15 2 5 8 16 9 10 17 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 II I 18 Durkheim(1897) Hamermesh&Soss(1974)Dixit&Pindyck(1994) Becker&Posner(2004) Rosenthal(1993)

More information

アジ研教科書「マクロ安定化」.PDF

アジ研教科書「マクロ安定化」.PDF 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Corbo, V., and S. Fischer, Structural Adjustment, Stabilization and Policy Reform: Domestic and International Finance, in J. Behrman and T. N. Srinivasan, eds., Handbook of Development

More information

17 17 10 1 1 2776 1 2 1920 31% 38.2% 2 17 6 17 1 42 2 1 2

17 17 10 1 1 2776 1 2 1920 31% 38.2% 2 17 6 17 1 42 2 1 2 05m 1 17 17 10 1 1 2776 1 2 1920 31% 38.2% 2 17 6 17 1 42 2 1 2 3 1975 1960 (1997) (2000) (1997) 1.701 (2000) 0.793 (1997) 2 11 (1999) 16 (2004) (1997) 1 2.720 2.751 3 4 17 (2005) 17 (2005)10 1 1 2776

More information

BB 報告書完成版_修正版)040415.doc

BB 報告書完成版_修正版)040415.doc 3 4 5 8 KW Q = AK α W β q = a + α k + βw q = log Q, k = log K, w = logw i P ij v ij P ij = exp( vij ), J exp( v ) k= 1 ik v i j = X β αp + γnu j j j j X j j p j j NU j j NU j (

More information

4703ALL01

4703ALL01 473201010 *** (1999) 16 2017 20023 2 1 2 1220 (1999a),(1999b) (1998), (2002) (2003)(1999)(2003) Conjoint Analysis Conjoint Analysis Willingness to PayStandard gamble Time trade-off Rating Scale Willingness

More information

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step

Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Step Stepwise Chow Test * Chow Test Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Stepwise Chow Test Riddell Riddell first step second step sub-step Stepwise Chow Test a Stepwise Chow Test Takeuchi 1991Nomura

More information

(CFW ) CFW 1

(CFW ) CFW 1 DSGE * 1 * 2 2012 11 *1 2012 11 22 25 ( ) ( ) *2 3 (CFW ) CFW 1 1 3 1.1....................................... 3 1.2.................................. 5 2 DSGE 6 2.1.............................. 6 2.2.....................................

More information

公的・非営利組織の人的資源マネジメント戦略:

公的・非営利組織の人的資源マネジメント戦略: NPO Drucker, ; Hobson et al., ;, Pearce, Cnaan & Cascio, ; Pearce, ;, Pearce, Cnaan & Cascio, ; Lansley, Brichacek. Ellis Brudney Mintzberg, ;, , F....... F P

More information

shuron.dvi

shuron.dvi 01M3065 1 4 1.1........................... 4 1.2........................ 5 1.3........................ 6 2 8 2.1.......................... 8 2.2....................... 9 3 13 3.1.............................

More information

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析- 2 JEL Classification: G21, G14 Key words: e-mail y-murakami@aria.ocn.ne.jp 1 The Effect of Bank Failure on Client Firms A Study on the Hanwa Bank s Failure By Yoshiko Murakami Abstract The financial theories

More information

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─ q E-mail: kenji.nishizaki@boj.or.jp E-mail: kurasawa@ynu.ac.jp OECD Vives Tirole Shleifer and Vishny q %% %% % % Allen and Gale %% % Admati, Pfreiderer and Zechner Burkart, Gromb and Panunzi Cremer 1995Pagno

More information

Masanori Hashimoto Rene Fahr and Hilmar Schneider 1. Hashimoto, Masanori Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider Hashimoto, Masanori 2004 Fahr

Masanori Hashimoto Rene Fahr and Hilmar Schneider 1. Hashimoto, Masanori Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider Hashimoto, Masanori 2004 Fahr 17 6 22 Masanori Hashimoto Rene Fahr and Hilmar Schneider 1. Hashimoto, Masanori Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider 2. 2004 Hashimoto, Masanori 2004 Fahr, Rene and Hilmar Schneider 2004-1 - Fahr and Schneider2004

More information

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464> 615 379 1 1995 10 OECD 1995 380 616 57 3 1993 4 3071 2003 1 3247 10 10 4 1 1990 2000 2003 10 617 381 2002 2 3 4 5 2 1 1990 1995 1995 12 1995 IPP Independent Power Producer 1 2004a, b 2005a, b 382 618 57

More information

untitled

untitled 2 21 1984 50 3500 4200 1 3 1 1985 1984 1 2 1984 50 3 2 3 4 1 1989 35 3 4 5 22 3 1 19811984 19841987 1989 1981 1985 13 1984 1984 1986 1985 20 10 1987 10 2 36 1989 65 1989 1953 1985 60 1933 6.71% 43 3.15%53

More information

DGE DGE 2 2 1 1990 1 1 3 (1) ( 1

DGE DGE 2 2 1 1990 1 1 3 (1) ( 1 早 稲 田 大 学 現 代 政 治 経 済 研 究 所 ゼロ 金 利 下 で 量 的 緩 和 政 策 は 有 効 か? -ニューケインジアンDGEモデルによる 信 用 創 造 の 罠 の 分 析 - 井 上 智 洋 品 川 俊 介 都 築 栄 司 上 浦 基 No.J1403 Working Paper Series Institute for Research in Contemporary Political

More information

社会階層と食生活

社会階層と食生活 35 59 822 68.7% 15.4% 27.5% 50.0% 81.2% 91.1% 1 1 1946 66.4% 1980 30% 20% 2 (Sociological Theory and Methods) 81 2010, Vol.25, No.1: 81 93 2 2.1 1) Bourdieu and Passeron 1970 Bourdieu 1979 1990: I 276-8

More information

6. Tel03-3201-0517 2

6. Tel03-3201-0517 2 1. 2004 2 10 (i) 3 1 2 1 (ii) 18.30 16,900 2004 (iii) 50 3 2. 3. 3 4. 5. 1 6. Tel03-3201-0517 E-Mailnaoko.horie@mizuho-ri.co.jp 2 4 2004 4 2 1 4 18.30 5 50 5 59.3 50.2 5 6 6 7 7 9 11 12 13 99 13 13 14

More information

untitled

untitled * 2001 (B) ** 113-0033 7-3-1 TEL(03)5841-5641FAX(03)5841-5521iwamoto@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp 1990 1990 1 2 3 1 (2002) 2 social infrastructure social capital Woolcook (1998) 3-1 - - 2 - 1990 Mera (1973) G Cobb-Douglas

More information

untitled

untitled Horioka Nakagawa and Oshima u ( c ) t+ 1 E β (1 + r ) 1 = t i+ 1 u ( c ) t 0 β c t y t uc ( t ) E () t r t c E β t ct γ ( + r ) 1 0 t+ 1 1 = t+ 1 ξ ct + β ct γ c t + 1 1+ r ) E β t + 1 t ct (1

More information

JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 112 Vol.28 No.42009

JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 112 Vol.28 No.42009 Japan Marketing Academy JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 112 Vol.28 No.42009 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 112 Vol.28 No.42009 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 112 Vol.28 No.42009 JAPAN MARKETING JOURNAL 112 Vol.28 No.42009 JAPAN

More information

@08460025ヨコ/伊東 217号

@08460025ヨコ/伊東 217号 A B B A B A B A B stratification inequality Marmot, Smith, Why are the Japanese living longer?, British Medical Journal, 1989 Kondo, Kawachi, Subramanian, Takeda, Yamagata Do social comparisons

More information

,,,

,,, 法定割増賃金率の引き上げが時間外労働時間 * および有給休暇の付与 取得に与える影響 深堀遼太郎萩原里紗 Keio Household Panel Survey: KHPS Difference in Differences DD ,,, Hamermesh, Trejo, Keio Household Panel Survey: KHPS KHPS URL http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/

More information

1970). Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C. and R. D. Willig (1982); Contestable Markets and The Theory of Industry Structure, 1982. Caves, R. and M. E. Porter (1977); From entry barriers to mobility barriers:

More information