橡超弦理論はブラックホールの謎を解けるか?
|
|
- かげたつ わかはら
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 (Can String Theory Solve the Puzzles of Black Holes?) makoto.natsuume@kek.jp D-brane 1 Schwarzschild [1] 1 1 1
2 2 2 [2] [7,8] Schwarzschild 2GM/c 2 Schwarzschild G M c 2 2
3 T κ de = TdS dm = κ 8πG da ds 0 da 0 T = 0 κ = 0 1: Schwarzschild A E M κ T κ S A 3
4 Bekenstein 74 Hawking Hawking κ κ Hawking T = hκ/2π 3 S BH = A 4G h Bekenstein - Hawking (1) S BH Hawking S BH S BH h h 0 S BH ultraviolet catastrophe Rayleigh - Jeans S BH 2.2 [9] Hawking Hawking pure state Hawking mixed state Einstein - Podolsky - Rosen 3 c = k B = 1 h = 1 (1) 4
5 Hawking 4 Hawking 3 Schwarzschild 4 A 5
6 [8] fundamental string g s G G gs 2l2 s l s g s Schwarzschild 2GM g s g s Schwarzschild Schwarzschild M? (2) M d string [10] d string e lsm (3) d BH d BH e A G e GM 2 (4) (1) 2GM M 6
7 2: Schwarzschild 7
8 g s 1 g s (3) Schwarzschild Schwarzschild l s l s well-defined GM l s S string l s M GM M GM 2 (5) G (3) (4) (1) [11] 93 Susskind 8
9 [12] Susskind Horowitz Polchinski [13] 4 Susskind 5 (5) 4.1 BPS Q Q M Q = M BPS BPS Q = M BPS BPS BPS Schwarzschild 9
10 Reissner-Nordström Q M Q < M Hawking Q = M Q = M Hawking extremal black hole BPS BPS BPS (2)? Q BPS (6) BPS BPS (6) Susskind 95 Sen [14] Sen 5 BPS BPS D-brane 4.2 D-brane D-brane [2, 15] D-brane p p = 0 p = 1 p = 2 membrane.. Dp-brane D-brane 10
11 D-brane BPS D-brane BPS 3: D-brane D-brane D-brane [2, 15] D-brane D-brane D-brane 1/(g s l s ) D-brane Q Q/(g s l s ) D-brane Schwarzschild 2GM O(g s Q) g s D-brane D-brane BPS? Q D-brane BPS (7) Strominger Vafa Reissner-Nordström BPS (1) 5 11
12 Strominger Vafa [16, 17] Reissner-Nordström 10 g s 1 φ g s = e φ Reissner-Nordström D-brane 4 Sen D-brane Reissner-Nordström BPS g s 1 BPS D-brane Q D-brane g s Q D-brane Schwarzschild O(g s Q) 4 D-brane D-brane Q g s g s Q 1 12
13 4: Callan Maldacena D-brane 5 8 R IIB D1 D1 D5 D5 D-brane 5 Q 1 D1 Q 5 D5 D1 D5 D1 10 x 5, x 6, x 7, x 8, x 9 5 dominant [18] 13
14 T 5 = T 4 S 1 D1 x 9 R n/r D-brane Q 1, Q 5, n ds 2 = λ 2/3 dt 2 + λ 1/3 (dr 2 + r 2 dω 2 3 ) (8) dω 2 3 λ = (1 + c 1Q 1 )(1 + c 5Q 5 )(1 + c nn r 2 r 2 ) (9) r2 c 1, c 5, c n G 5 c 1 c 5 c n = (4G 5 /π) 2 c 1 Q 1 = c 5 Q 5 = c n n = ρ 2 0 (8) Reissner-Nordström ds 2 = (1 ρ2 0 ρ 2)2 dt 2 + dρ2 (1 ρ2 0) + ρ 2 ρ2 dω 2 3 (10) 2 ρ 2 = r 2 +ρ 2 0 r = 0 6 S 3 2π 2 ( ) 3 (1) S BH = A = 2π Q 1 Q 5 n (11) 4G 5 D-brane D1 x 9 R D1 D5 4Q 1 Q 5 D-brane Q 1 = Q 5 = 1 D1 D5 D5 D1 D1 x 5, x 6, x 7, x 8 6 r = 0 r = 0 dω 2 3 r = 0 λ 1 + Q/r 2 14
15 d (3) 2πR n/r n d exp(2π cn 6 ) (12) c 1/2 c = 6Q 1 Q 5 S = 2π Q 1 Q 5 n (13) (11) 6 5 Hawking [16] D-brane Hawking D-brane D-brane BPS
16 Bekenstein - Hawking [2] Feynman (1) Hawking [19] 16
17 [20] [21] Strominger D-brane Hawking D-brane D-brane Hawking D-brane BPS g s D-brane D-brane D-brane D-brane Hawking 17
18 [1] A. Strominger and C. Vafa: Phys. Lett. B379 (1996) 99, hepth/ [A]. 7 [2] 53, 312, May 1998 [B]. [3] J. Polchinski: Rev. Mod. Phys. 68 (1996) 1245, hep-th/ [B]. [4] Search and Discovery, Physics Today, Vol. 50, No. 3, 19, March 1997 [B]. [5] G. T. Horowitz: gr-qc/ ; gr-qc/ [C]; J. M. Maldacena: hep-th/ [c]; Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 61A (1998) 111, hep-th/ [C]; A. W. Peet: hep-th/ [C]; A. Sen: hep-th/ [C];, No. 416, 51, Feb [C]. [6] 52, 161, March 1997 [B]. [7], No. 422, 36, Aug [B]. [8] R. M. Wald: gr-qc/ [C]. [9] L. Susskind: Scientific American, Vol. 276, No. 4, 52, April 1997 [B]; J. Preskill: hep-th/ [C]; D. N. Page: hep-th/ [C]. [10] M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, and E. Witten: Superstring theory (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1987); J. Polchinski: String theory (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1998). 7 18
19 [11] G. t Hooft: Nucl. Phys. B335 (1990) 138 [A]. [12] L. Susskind: hep-th/ [A]. [13] G. T. Horowitz and J. Polchinski: Phys. Rev. D57 (1998) 2557, hepth/ [A]; Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 6189, hep-th/ [A]. [14] A. Sen: Mod. Phys. Lett. A10 (1995) 2081, hep-th/ [A]. [15] J. Polchinski: Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 4724, hep-th/ [A]; J. Polchinski, S. Chaudhuri, and C. V. Johnson: hep-th/ [C]; J. Polchinski: hep-th/ [C]. [16] C. G. Callan and J. M. Maldacena: Nucl. Phys. B472 (1996) 591, hep-th/ [A]. [17] G. Horowitz and A. Strominger: Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 2368, hepth/ [A]. [18] J. M. Maldacena and L. Susskind: Nucl. Phys. B475 (1996) 679, hepth/ [A]. [19] G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking: Phys. Rev. D15 (1977) 2752 [A]. [20] A. Ashtekar, J. Baez, A. Corichi, and K. Krasnov: Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 904, gr-qc/ [A]. [21] A. Strominger: J. High Energy Phys. 2 (1998) 9, hep-th/ [A]. 19
20 [1] [1] Hawking 8 Feynman 8 Weinberg [2] Polchinski Fermi liquid 20
21 [1] private communications. [2] S. Weinberg: Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 86 (1986) 43. [3] J. Polchinski: in Recent Directions in Particle Theory, Proceedings of the 1992 TASI, eds. J. Harvey and J. Polchinski (World Scientific, Singapore, 1993) hep-th/ [4] J. Fröhlich : private communications. [3] [4] 21
D-brane K 1, 2 ( ) 1 K D-brane K K D-brane Witten [1] D-brane K K K K D-brane D-brane K RR BPS D-brane
D-brane K 1, 2 E-mail: sugimoto@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp (2004 12 16 ) 1 K D-brane K K D-brane Witten [1] D-brane K K K K D-brane D-brane K RR BPS D-brane D-brane RR D-brane K D-brane K D-brane K K [2, 3]
More informationYITP50.dvi
1 70 80 90 50 2 3 3 84 first revolution 4 94 second revolution 5 6 2 1: 1 3 consistent 1-loop Feynman 1-loop Feynman loop loop loop Feynman 2 3 2: 1-loop Feynman loop 3 cycle 4 = 3: 4: 4 cycle loop Feynman
More informationssastro2016_shiromizu
26 th July 2016 / 1991(M1)-1995(D3), 2005( ) 26 th July 2016 / 1. 2. 3. 4. . ( ) 1960-70 1963 Kerr 1965 BH Penrose 1967 Hawking BH Israel 1971 (Carter)-75(Robinson) BH 1972 BH theorem(,, ) Hawk 1975 Hawking
More informationBose-Einstein Hawking Hawking Hawking Hawking nk Hawking Bose-Einstein Hawking 1 Bekenstein[1] Hawking 1974 [2,
Bose-Einstein Hawking E-mail: moinai@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp Hawking Hawking Hawking nk Hawking Bose-Einstein Hawking 1 Bekenstein[1] Hawking 1974 [2, 3] Hawking Hawking 6nK Hawking Hawking 3K Hawking Hawking
More information“‡”�„³…u…›…b…N…z†[…‰
2009 8 31 / 4 : : Outline 4 G MN T t g x mu... g µν = G MN X M x µ X N x ν X G MN c.f., : X 5, X 6,... g µν : : g µν, A µ : R µν 1 2 Rg µν = 8πGT µν : G MN : R MN 1 2 RG MN = 0 ( ) Kaluza-Klein G MN =
More informationuntitled
Abstract Black Hole Black Hole Λ 1 1 Introduction 4 1.1 Prelude : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 4 1.2 History : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
More informationThe World's No.1 Science & Technology News Service Hawking cracks black hole paradox 19:00 14 July 04 Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition. Subs
2004 AUG 6 1 The World's No.1 Science & Technology News Service Hawking cracks black hole paradox 19:00 14 July 04 Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition. Subscribe and get 4 free issues. Hawking concedes
More information一般相対性理論に関するリーマン計量の変形について
1896 2014 137-149 137 ( ) 1 $(N^{4}, g)$ $N$ 4 $g$ $(3, 1)$ $R_{ab}- \frac{1}{2}rg_{ab}=t_{ab}$ (1) $R_{ab}$ $g$ $R$ $g$ ( ) $T_{ab}$ $T$ $R_{ab}- \frac{1}{2}rg_{ab}=0$ 4 $R_{ab}=0$ $\mathbb{r}^{3,1}$
More informationQCD 1 QCD GeV 2014 QCD 2015 QCD SU(3) QCD A µ g µν QCD 1
QCD 1 QCD GeV 2014 QCD 2015 QCD SU(3) QCD A µ g µν QCD 1 (vierbein) QCD QCD 1 1: QCD QCD Γ ρ µν A µ R σ µνρ F µν g µν A µ Lagrangian gr TrFµν F µν No. Yes. Yes. No. No! Yes! [1] Nash & Sen [2] Riemann
More information1: Sheldon L. Glashow (Ouroboros) [1] 1 v(r) u(r, r ) ( e 2 / r r ) H 2 [2] H = ( dr ψ σ + (r) 1 2 ) σ 2m r 2 + v(r) µ ψ σ (r) + 1 dr dr ψ σ + (r)ψ +
1 1.1 21 11 22 10 33 cm 10 29 cm 60 6 8 10 12 cm 1cm 1 1.2 2 1 1 1: Sheldon L. Glashow (Ouroboros) [1] 1 v(r) u(r, r ) ( e 2 / r r ) H 2 [2] H = ( dr ψ σ + (r) 1 2 ) σ 2m r 2 + v(r) µ ψ σ (r) + 1 dr dr
More information3 3.1 R r r + R R r Rr [ ] ˆn(r) = ˆn(r + R) (3.1) R R = r ˆn(r) = ˆn(0) r 0 R = r C nn (r, r ) = C nn (r + R, r + R) = C nn (r r, 0) (3.2) ( 2.2 ) C
3 3.1 R r r + R R r Rr [ ] ˆn(r) = ˆn(r + R) (3.1) R R = r ˆn(r) = ˆn(0) r 0 R = r C nn (r, r ) = C nn (r + R, r + R) = C nn (r r, 0) (3.2) ( 2.2 ) C nn (r r ) = C nn (R(r r )) [2 ] 2 g(r, r ) ˆn(r) ˆn(r
More informationΛ(1405) supported by Global Center of Excellence Program Nanoscience and Quantum Physics 2009, Aug. 5th 1
Λ(1405) supported by Global Center of Excellence Program Nanoscience and Quantum Physics 2009, Aug. 5th 1 S KN Λ(1405) Λ(1405) CDD Nc 2 L = q(i/ m)q P L = 1 2 (1 γ 5), P R = 1 2 (1 + γ 5), q L P L q, q
More information1 2 LDA Local Density Approximation 2 LDA 1 LDA LDA N N N H = N [ 2 j + V ion (r j ) ] + 1 e 2 2 r j r k j j k (3) V ion V ion (r) = I Z I e 2 r
11 March 2005 1 [ { } ] 3 1/3 2 + V ion (r) + V H (r) 3α 4π ρ σ(r) ϕ iσ (r) = ε iσ ϕ iσ (r) (1) KS Kohn-Sham [ 2 + V ion (r) + V H (r) + V σ xc(r) ] ϕ iσ (r) = ε iσ ϕ iσ (r) (2) 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 LDA Local
More informationEinstein ( ) YITP
Einstein ( ) 2013 8 21 YITP 0. massivegravity Massive spin 2 field theory Fierz-Pauli (FP ) Kinetic term L (2) EH = 1 2 [ λh µν λ h µν λ h λ h 2 µ h µλ ν h νλ + 2 µ h µλ λ h], (1) Mass term FP L mass =
More information( ) ( ) 1729 (, 2016:17) = = (1) 1 1
1729 1 2016 10 28 1 1729 1111 1111 1729 (1887 1920) (1877 1947) 1729 (, 2016:17) 12 3 1728 9 3 729 1729 = 12 3 + 1 3 = 10 3 + 9 3 (1) 1 1 2 1729 1729 19 13 7 = 1729 = 12 3 + 1 3 = 10 3 + 9 3 13 7 = 91
More informationD.dvi
2005 3 3 1 7 1.1... 7 1.2 Brane... 8 1.3 AdS/CFT black hole... 9 1.4... 10 2 11 2.1 Kaluza-Klein... 11 2.1.1 Kazula-Klein 4... 11 2.1.2 Kaluza-Klein... 13 2.2 Brane... 14 2.2.1 Brane 4... 14 2.2.2 Bulk
More information1/2 ( ) 1 * 1 2/3 *2 up charm top -1/3 down strange bottom 6 (ν e, ν µ, ν τ ) -1 (e) (µ) (τ) 6 ( 2 ) 6 6 I II III u d ν e e c s ν µ µ t b ν τ τ (2a) (
August 26, 2005 1 1 1.1...................................... 1 1.2......................... 4 1.3....................... 5 1.4.............. 7 1.5.................... 8 1.6 GIM..........................
More information[3] 2 2
(Akio HOSOYA) 2-12-1 Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology 2-12-1 Oh-Okayama, Meguro, Tokyo 152-8551 2011 9 27 1 2 9 = 18 9 9 = 81 3 9 = 27 8 9 = 72 [1] [2] email: ahosoya@th.phys.titech.ac.jp
More information6 2 T γ T B (6.4) (6.1) [( d nm + 3 ] 2 nt B )a 3 + nt B da 3 = 0 (6.9) na 3 = T B V 3/2 = T B V γ 1 = const. or T B a 2 = const. (6.10) H 2 = 8π kc2
1 6 6.1 (??) (P = ρ rad /3) ρ rad T 4 d(ρv ) + PdV = 0 (6.1) dρ rad ρ rad + 4 da a = 0 (6.2) dt T + da a = 0 T 1 a (6.3) ( ) n ρ m = n (m + 12 ) m v2 = n (m + 32 ) T, P = nt (6.4) (6.1) d [(nm + 32 ] )a
More information( ) ) ) ) 5) 1 J = σe 2 6) ) 9) 1955 Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes )
( 3 7 4 ) 2 2 ) 8 2 954 2) 955 3) 5) J = σe 2 6) 955 7) 9) 955 Statistical-Mechanical Theory of Irreversible Processes 957 ) 3 4 2 A B H (t) = Ae iωt B(t) = B(ω)e iωt B(ω) = [ Φ R (ω) Φ R () ] iω Φ R (t)
More informationE 1/2 3/ () +3/2 +3/ () +1/2 +1/ / E [1] B (3.2) F E 4.1 y x E = (E x,, ) j y 4.1 E int = (, E y, ) j y = (Hall ef
4 213 5 8 4.1.1 () f A exp( E/k B ) f E = A [ k B exp E ] = f k B k B = f (2 E /3n). 1 k B /2 σ = e 2 τ(e)d(e) 2E 3nf 3m 2 E de = ne2 τ E m (4.1) E E τ E = τe E = / τ(e)e 3/2 f de E 3/2 f de (4.2) f (3.2)
More informationGmech08.dvi
51 5 5.1 5.1.1 P r P z θ P P P z e r e, z ) r, θ, ) 5.1 z r e θ,, z r, θ, = r sin θ cos = r sin θ sin 5.1) e θ e z = r cos θ r, θ, 5.1: 0 r
More information8 (2006 ) X ( ) 1. X X X 2. ( ) ( ) ( 1) X (a) (b) 1: (a) (b)
8 (2006 ) X ( ) 1. X X X 2. ( ) ( ) ( 1) X (a) (b) 1: (a) (b) X hkl 2θ ω 000 2: ω X 2θ X 3: X 2 X ω X 2θ X θ-2θ X X 2-1. ( ) ( 3) X 2θ ω 4 Si GaAs Si/Si GaAs/GaAs X 2θ : 2 2θ 000 ω 000 ω ω = θ 4: 2θ ω
More information1. z dr er r sinθ dϕ eϕ r dθ eθ dr θ dr dθ r x 0 ϕ r sinθ dϕ r sinθ dϕ y dr dr er r dθ eθ r sinθ dϕ eϕ 2. (r, θ, φ) 2 dr 1 h r dr 1 e r h θ dθ 1 e θ h
IB IIA 1 1 r, θ, φ 1 (r, θ, φ)., r, θ, φ 0 r
More informationC O N T E N T S 1
2014 Vol.107 C O N T E N T S 1 Communications 3 Vol.107 2 3 Communications Vol.107 4 5 Communications 7 6 Vol.107 6 7 Communications Vol.107 8 9 Communications Vol.107 10 11 Communications Vol.107 12 13
More informationHilbert, von Neuman [1, p.86] kt 2 1 [1, 2] 2 2
hara@math.kyushu-u.ac.jp 1 1 1.1............................................... 2 1.2............................................. 3 2 3 3 5 3.1............................................. 6 3.2...................................
More information4 2 Rutherford 89 Rydberg λ = R ( n 2 ) n 2 n = n +,n +2, n = Lyman n =2 Balmer n =3 Paschen R Rydberg R = cm 896 Zeeman Zeeman Zeeman Lorentz
2 Rutherford 2. Rutherford N. Bohr Rutherford 859 Kirchhoff Bunsen 86 Maxwell Maxwell 885 Balmer λ Balmer λ = 364.56 n 2 n 2 4 Lyman, Paschen 3 nm, n =3, 4, 5, 4 2 Rutherford 89 Rydberg λ = R ( n 2 ) n
More informationφ 4 Minimal subtraction scheme 2-loop ε 2008 (University of Tokyo) (Atsuo Kuniba) version 21/Apr/ Formulas Γ( n + ɛ) = ( 1)n (1 n! ɛ + ψ(n + 1)
φ 4 Minimal subtraction scheme 2-loop ε 28 University of Tokyo Atsuo Kuniba version 2/Apr/28 Formulas Γ n + ɛ = n n! ɛ + ψn + + Oɛ n =,, 2, ψn + = + 2 + + γ, 2 n ψ = γ =.5772... Euler const, log + ax x
More information5 5.1 E 1, E 2 N 1, N 2 E tot N tot E tot = E 1 + E 2, N tot = N 1 + N 2 S 1 (E 1, N 1 ), S 2 (E 2, N 2 ) E 1, E 2 S tot = S 1 + S 2 2 S 1 E 1 = S 2 E
5 5.1 E 1, E 2 N 1, N 2 E tot N tot E tot = E 1 + E 2, N tot = N 1 + N 2 S 1 (E 1, N 1 ), S 2 (E 2, N 2 ) E 1, E 2 S tot = S 1 + S 2 2 S 1 E 1 = S 2 E 2, S 1 N 1 = S 2 N 2 2 (chemical potential) µ S N
More information1 (Berry,1975) 2-6 p (S πr 2 )p πr 2 p 2πRγ p p = 2γ R (2.5).1-1 : : : : ( ).2 α, β α, β () X S = X X α X β (.1) 1 2
2005 9/8-11 2 2.2 ( 2-5) γ ( ) γ cos θ 2πr πρhr 2 g h = 2γ cos θ ρgr (2.1) γ = ρgrh (2.2) 2 cos θ θ cos θ = 1 (2.2) γ = 1 ρgrh (2.) 2 2. p p ρgh p ( ) p p = p ρgh (2.) h p p = 2γ r 1 1 (Berry,1975) 2-6
More information* 1 1 (i) (ii) Brückner-Hartree-Fock (iii) (HF, BCS, HFB) (iv) (TDHF,TDHFB) (RPA) (QRPA) (v) (vi) *
* 1 1 (i) (ii) Brückner-Hartree-Fock (iii) (HF, BCS, HFB) (iv) (TDHF,TDHFB) (RPA) (QRPA) (v) (vi) *1 2004 1 1 ( ) ( ) 1.1 140 MeV 1.2 ( ) ( ) 1.3 2.6 10 8 s 7.6 10 17 s? Λ 2.5 10 10 s 6 10 24 s 1.4 ( m
More information(Maldacena) ads/cft
SGC - 90 100 1998 (Maldacena) ads/cft 100 2011 4 1 2012 3 1) μ, ν 2) i i, j, k 3) a h a,,h 1.6 4) μ μ = / x μ 5) μ 6) g μν (, +, +, +, ) g μν 7) Γ α μν Γμν α = 1 2 gαβ ( μ g βν + ν g βμ β g μν ) 8) R μναβ
More informationGmech08.dvi
145 13 13.1 13.1.1 0 m mg S 13.1 F 13.1 F /m S F F 13.1 F mg S F F mg 13.1: m d2 r 2 = F + F = 0 (13.1) 146 13 F = F (13.2) S S S S S P r S P r r = r 0 + r (13.3) r 0 S S m d2 r 2 = F (13.4) (13.3) d 2
More informationa L = Ψ éiγ c pa qaa mc ù êë ( - )- úû Ψ 1 Ψ 4 γ a a 0, 1,, 3 {γ a, γ b } η ab æi O ö æo ö β, σ = ço I α = è - ø çèσ O ø γ 0 x iβ γ i x iβα i
解説 4 matsuo.mamoru jaea.go.jp 4 eizi imr.tohoku.ac.jp 4 maekawa.sadamichi jaea.go.jp i ii iii i Gd Tb Dy g khz Pt ii iii Keywords vierbein 3 dreibein 4 vielbein torsion JST-ERATO 1 017 1. 1..1 a L = Ψ
More information液晶の物理1:連続体理論(弾性,粘性)
The Physics of Liquid Crystals P. G. de Gennes and J. Prost (Oxford University Press, 1993) Liquid crystals are beautiful and mysterious; I am fond of them for both reasons. My hope is that some readers
More information1
http://www.is.oit.ac.jp/~shinkai/ 1 2 3 一般相対性理論 重力場の方程式 1916 空間の曲がりがモノの運動を決める アインシュタイン曲率テンソル 空間の歪み モノがあると空間が曲がる エネルギー運動量テンソル モノの分布 4 一般相対性理論 重力場の方程式 1916 空間の曲がりがモノの運動を決める モノがあると空間が曲がる 定常的な宇宙モデルをつくるために
More information1 2 2 (Dielecrics) Maxwell ( ) D H
2003.02.13 1 2 2 (Dielecrics) 4 2.1... 4 2.2... 5 2.3... 6 2.4... 6 3 Maxwell ( ) 9 3.1... 9 3.2 D H... 11 3.3... 13 4 14 4.1... 14 4.2... 14 4.3... 17 4.4... 19 5 22 6 THz 24 6.1... 24 6.2... 25 7 26
More informationLLG-R8.Nisus.pdf
d M d t = γ M H + α M d M d t M γ [ 1/ ( Oe sec) ] α γ γ = gµ B h g g µ B h / π γ g = γ = 1.76 10 [ 7 1/ ( Oe sec) ] α α = λ γ λ λ λ α γ α α H α = γ H ω ω H α α H K K H K / M 1 1 > 0 α 1 M > 0 γ α γ =
More information4. ϵ(ν, T ) = c 4 u(ν, T ) ϵ(ν, T ) T ν π4 Planck dx = 0 e x 1 15 U(T ) x 3 U(T ) = σt 4 Stefan-Boltzmann σ 2π5 k 4 15c 2 h 3 = W m 2 K 4 5.
A 1. Boltzmann Planck u(ν, T )dν = 8πh ν 3 c 3 kt 1 dν h 6.63 10 34 J s Planck k 1.38 10 23 J K 1 Boltzmann u(ν, T ) T ν e hν c = 3 10 8 m s 1 2. Planck λ = c/ν Rayleigh-Jeans u(ν, T )dν = 8πν2 kt dν c
More information1 (Contents) (1) Beginning of the Universe, Dark Energy and Dark Matter Noboru NAKANISHI 2 2. Problem of Heat Exchanger (1) Kenji
8 4 2018 6 2018 6 7 1 (Contents) 1. 2 2. (1) 22 3. 31 1. Beginning of the Universe, Dark Energy and Dark Matter Noboru NAKANISHI 2 2. Problem of Heat Exchanger (1) Kenji SETO 22 3. Editorial Comments Tadashi
More informationBH BH BH BH Typeset by FoilTEX 2
GR BH BH 2015.10.10 BH at 2015.09.07 NICT 2015.05.26 Typeset by FoilTEX 1 BH BH BH BH Typeset by FoilTEX 2 1. BH 1.1 1 Typeset by FoilTEX 3 1.2 2 A B A B t = 0 A: m a [kg] B: m b [kg] t = t f star free
More informationI ( ) 1 de Broglie 1 (de Broglie) p λ k h Planck ( Js) p = h λ = k (1) h 2π : Dirac k B Boltzmann ( J/K) T U = 3 2 k BT
I (008 4 0 de Broglie (de Broglie p λ k h Planck ( 6.63 0 34 Js p = h λ = k ( h π : Dirac k B Boltzmann (.38 0 3 J/K T U = 3 k BT ( = λ m k B T h m = 0.067m 0 m 0 = 9. 0 3 kg GaAs( a T = 300 K 3 fg 07345
More informationkougiroku7_26.dvi
2005 : D-brane tachyon : ( ) 2005 8 7 8 :,,,,,,, 1 2 1.1 Introduction............................... 2 1.2......................... 6 1.3 Second Revolution (1994 )................... 11 2 Type II 26 2.1
More informationA
A04-164 2008 2 13 1 4 1.1.......................................... 4 1.2..................................... 4 1.3..................................... 4 1.4..................................... 5 2
More information講義ノート 物性研究 電子版 Vol.3 No.1, (2013 年 T c µ T c Kammerlingh Onnes 77K ρ 5.8µΩcm 4.2K ρ 10 4 µωcm σ 77K ρ 4.2K σ σ = ne 2 τ/m τ 77K
2 2 T c µ T c 1 1.1 1911 Kammerlingh Onnes 77K ρ 5.8µΩcm 4.2K ρ 1 4 µωcm σ 77K ρ 4.2K σ σ = ne 2 τ/m τ 77K τ 4.2K σ 58 213 email:takada@issp.u-tokyo.ac.jp 1933 Meissner Ochsenfeld λ = 1 5 cm B = χ B =
More information中央大学セミナー.ppt
String Gas Cosmology References Brandenberger & Vafa, Superstrings in the early universe, Nucl.Phys.B316(1988) 391. Tseytlin & Vafa, Elements of string cosmology, Nucl.Phys.B372 (1992) 443. Brandenberger,
More informationFeynman Encounter with Mathematics 52, [1] N. Kumano-go, Feynman path integrals as analysis on path space by time slicing approximation. Bull
Feynman Encounter with Mathematics 52, 200 9 [] N. Kumano-go, Feynman path integrals as analysis on path space by time slicing approximation. Bull. Sci. Math. vol. 28 (2004) 97 25. [2] D. Fujiwara and
More informationQMI13a.dvi
I (2013 (MAEDA, Atsutaka) 25 10 15 [ I I [] ( ) 0. (a) (b) Plank Compton de Broglie Bohr 1. (a) Einstein- de Broglie (b) (c) 1 (d) 2. Schrödinger (a) Schrödinger (b) Schrödinger (c) (d) 3. (a) (b) (c)
More informationADM-Hamiltonian Cheeger-Gromov 3. Penrose
ADM-Hamiltonian 1. 2. Cheeger-Gromov 3. Penrose 0. ADM-Hamiltonian (M 4, h) Einstein-Hilbert M 4 R h hdx L h = R h h δl h = 0 (Ric h ) αβ 1 2 R hg αβ = 0 (Σ 3, g ij ) (M 4, h ij ) g ij, k ij Σ π ij = g(k
More informationII
II 28 5 31 3 I 5 1 7 1.1.......................... 7 1.1.1 ( )................ 7 1.1.2........................ 12 1.1.3................... 13 1.1.4 ( )................. 14 1.1.5................... 15
More informationV(x) m e V 0 cos x π x π V(x) = x < π, x > π V 0 (i) x = 0 (V(x) V 0 (1 x 2 /2)) n n d 2 f dξ 2ξ d f 2 dξ + 2n f = 0 H n (ξ) (ii) H
199 1 1 199 1 1. Vx) m e V cos x π x π Vx) = x < π, x > π V i) x = Vx) V 1 x /)) n n d f dξ ξ d f dξ + n f = H n ξ) ii) H n ξ) = 1) n expξ ) dn dξ n exp ξ )) H n ξ)h m ξ) exp ξ )dξ = π n n!δ n,m x = Vx)
More information総研大恒星進化概要.dvi
The Structure and Evolution of Stars I. Basic Equations. M r r =4πr2 ρ () P r = GM rρ. r 2 (2) r: M r : P and ρ: G: M r Lagrange r = M r 4πr 2 rho ( ) P = GM r M r 4πr. 4 (2 ) s(ρ, P ) s(ρ, P ) r L r T
More informationNote5.dvi
12 2011 7 4 2.2.2 Feynman ( ) S M N S M + N S Ai Ao t ij (i Ai, j Ao) N M G = 2e2 t ij 2 (8.28) h i μ 1 μ 2 J 12 J 12 / μ 2 μ 1 (8.28) S S (8.28) (8.28) 2 ( ) (collapse) j 12-1 2.3 2.3.1 Onsager S B S(B)
More information2 (March 13, 2010) N Λ a = i,j=1 x i ( d (a) i,j x j ), Λ h = N i,j=1 x i ( d (h) i,j x j ) B a B h B a = N i,j=1 ν i d (a) i,j, B h = x j N i,j=1 ν i
1. A. M. Turing [18] 60 Turing A. Gierer H. Meinhardt [1] : (GM) ) a t = D a a xx µa + ρ (c a2 h + ρ 0 (0 < x < l, t > 0) h t = D h h xx νh + c ρ a 2 (0 < x < l, t > 0) a x = h x = 0 (x = 0, l) a = a(x,
More informationYang-Mills Yang-Mills Yang-Mills 50 operator formalism operator formalism 1 I The Dawning of Gauge T
Yang-Mills 50 E-mail: kugo@yukawa.kyoto-u.ac.jp 2004 Yang-Mills 50 2004 Yang-Mills 50 operator formalism operator formalism 1 I The Dawning of Gauge Theory O Raifeartaigh [1] I, II, III O Raifeartaigh
More informationI ( ) 2019
I ( ) 2019 i 1 I,, III,, 1,,,, III,,,, (1 ) (,,, ), :...,, : NHK... NHK, (YouTube ),!!, manaba http://pen.envr.tsukuba.ac.jp/lec/physics/,, Richard Feynman Lectures on Physics Addison-Wesley,,,, x χ,
More informationSUSY DWs
@ 2013 1 25 Supersymmetric Domain Walls Eric A. Bergshoeff, Axel Kleinschmidt, and Fabio Riccioni Phys. Rev. D86 (2012) 085043 (arxiv:1206.5697) ( ) Contents 1 2 SUSY Domain Walls Wess-Zumino Embedding
More information.2 ρ dv dt = ρk grad p + 3 η grad (divv) + η 2 v.3 divh = 0, rote + c H t = 0 dive = ρ, H = 0, E = ρ, roth c E t = c ρv E + H c t = 0 H c E t = c ρv T
NHK 204 2 0 203 2 24 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 25 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 26 ( ) 7 00 7 50 203 2 27 ( ) 7 00 7 50 I. ( ν R n 2 ) m 2 n m, R = e 2 8πε 0 hca B =.09737 0 7 m ( ν = ) λ a B = 4πε 0ħ 2 m e e 2 = 5.2977
More informationD 2009 A * 1 ( ) *1 ( ) 0 1 1 6 2 32 2.1............................................. 32 2.2.................................. 41 2.3...................................... 47 3 65 3.1..............................................
More informationb.dvi
, 0 1 2 1.1 [2, 3] : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 3 2, 6 2.1 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 7 2.2 : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : 15 2.3, : : : : 18 3 23 4 31 5 35 6 46 6.1 Borel. : : : : : : : :
More information反D中間子と核子のエキゾチックな 束縛状態と散乱状態の解析
.... D 1 in collaboration with 1, 2, 1 RCNP 1, KEK 2 . Exotic hadron qqq q q Θ + Λ(1405) etc. uudd s? KN quasi-bound state? . D(B)-N bound state { { D D0 ( cu) B = D ( cd), B = + ( bu) B 0 ( bd) D(B)-N
More information( ) ) AGD 2) 7) 1
( 9 5 6 ) ) AGD ) 7) S. ψ (r, t) ψ(r, t) (r, t) Ĥ ψ(r, t) = e iĥt/ħ ψ(r, )e iĥt/ħ ˆn(r, t) = ψ (r, t)ψ(r, t) () : ψ(r, t)ψ (r, t) ψ (r, t)ψ(r, t) = δ(r r ) () ψ(r, t)ψ(r, t) ψ(r, t)ψ(r, t) = (3) ψ (r,
More informationTwist knot orbifold Chern-Simons
Twist knot orbifold Chern-Simons 1 3 M π F : F (M) M ω = {ω ij }, Ω = {Ω ij }, cs := 1 4π 2 (ω 12 ω 13 ω 23 + ω 12 Ω 12 + ω 13 Ω 13 + ω 23 Ω 23 ) M Chern-Simons., S. Chern J. Simons, F (M) Pontrjagin 2.,
More information2 2 1?? 2 1 1, 2 1, 2 1, 2, 3,... 1, 2 1, 3? , 2 2, 3? k, l m, n k, l m, n kn > ml...? 2 m, n n m
2009 IA I 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 4 21 1 1 2 1! 4, 5 1? 50 1 2 1 1 2 1 4 2 2 2 1?? 2 1 1, 2 1, 2 1, 2, 3,... 1, 2 1, 3? 2 1 3 1 2 1 1, 2 2, 3? 2 1 3 2 3 2 k, l m, n k, l m, n kn > ml...? 2 m, n n m 3 2
More information/ Christopher Essex Radiation and the Violation of Bilinearity in the Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Planet.Space Sci.32 (1984) 1035 Radiat
/ Christopher Essex Radiation and the Violation of Bilinearity in the Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Planet.Space Sci.32 (1984) 1035 Radiation and the Continuing Failure of the Bilinear Formalism,
More informationIntroduction SFT Tachyon condensation in SFT SFT ( ) at 1 / 38
( ) 2011 5 14 at 1 / 38 Introduction? = String Field Theory = SFT 2 / 38 String Field : ϕ(x, t) x ϕ x / ( ) X ( σ) (string field): Φ[X(σ), t] X(σ) Φ (Φ X(σ) ) X(σ) & / 3 / 38 SFT with Lorentz & Gauge Invariance
More informationx,, z v = (, b, c) v v 2 + b 2 + c 2 x,, z 1 i = (1, 0, 0), j = (0, 1, 0), k = (0, 0, 1) v 1 = ( 1, b 1, c 1 ), v 2 = ( 2, b 2, c 2 ) v
12 -- 1 4 2009 9 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 4-5 4-6 4-7 4-8 4-9 4-10 c 2011 1/(13) 4--1 2009 9 3 x,, z v = (, b, c) v v 2 + b 2 + c 2 x,, z 1 i = (1, 0, 0), j = (0, 1, 0), k = (0, 0, 1) v 1 = ( 1, b 1, c 1 ), v 2
More informationChebyshev Schrödinger Heisenberg H = 1 2m p2 + V (x), m = 1, h = 1 1/36 1 V (x) = { 0 (0 < x < L) (otherwise) ψ n (x) = 2 L sin (n + 1)π x L, n = 0, 1, 2,... Feynman K (a, b; T ) = e i EnT/ h ψ n (a)ψ
More informationT g T 0 T 0 fragile * ) 1 9) η T g T g /T *1. τ τ η = Gτ. G τ
615-851 ryoichi@chemekyoto-uacjp 66-852 onuki@scphyskyoto-uacjp 1 T g T T fragile *2 1 11) 1 9) η T g T g /T *1 τ 198 τ η = Gτ G τ T c η τ 12) strong fragile T c strong η η exp(e/k B T ) 1 2/3 E SiO 2
More informationW u = u(x, t) u tt = a 2 u xx, a > 0 (1) D := {(x, t) : 0 x l, t 0} u (0, t) = 0, u (l, t) = 0, t 0 (2)
3 215 4 27 1 1 u u(x, t) u tt a 2 u xx, a > (1) D : {(x, t) : x, t } u (, t), u (, t), t (2) u(x, ) f(x), u(x, ) t 2, x (3) u(x, t) X(x)T (t) u (1) 1 T (t) a 2 T (t) X (x) X(x) α (2) T (t) αa 2 T (t) (4)
More informationC10-075 26 2 12 1 1 4 1.1............................. 4 1.2............................ 5 1.3................................... 5 2 6 2.1............................ 6 2.2......................... 6
More information5. [1 ] 1 [], u(x, t) t c u(x, t) x (5.3) ξ x + ct, η x ct (5.4),u(x, t) ξ, η u(ξ, η), ξ t,, ( u(ξ,η) ξ η u(x, t) t ) u(x, t) { ( u(ξ, η) c t ξ ξ { (
5 5.1 [ ] ) d f(t) + a d f(t) + bf(t) : f(t) 1 dt dt ) u(x, t) c u(x, t) : u(x, t) t x : ( ) ) 1 : y + ay, : y + ay + by : ( ) 1 ) : y + ay, : yy + ay 3 ( ): ( ) ) : y + ay, : y + ay b [],,, [ ] au xx
More information2.1: n = N/V ( ) k F = ( 3π 2 N ) 1/3 = ( 3π 2 n ) 1/3 V (2.5) [ ] a = h2 2m k2 F h2 2ma (1 27 ) (1 8 ) erg, (2.6) /k B 1 11 / K
2 2.1? [ ] L 1 ε(p) = 1 ( p 2 2m x + p 2 y + pz) 2 = h2 ( k 2 2m x + ky 2 + kz) 2 n x, n y, n z (2.1) (2.2) p = hk = h 2π L (n x, n y, n z ) (2.3) n k p 1 i (ε i ε i+1 )1 1 g = 2S + 1 2 1/2 g = 2 ( p F
More information,, Andrej Gendiar (Density Matrix Renormalization Group, DMRG) 1 10 S.R. White [1, 2] 2 DMRG ( ) [3, 2] DMRG Baxter [4, 5] 2 Ising 2 1 Ising 1 1 Ising
,, Andrej Gendiar (Density Matrix Renormalization Group, DMRG) 1 10 S.R. White [1, 2] 2 DMRG ( ) [3, 2] DMRG Baxter [4, 5] 2 Ising 2 1 Ising 1 1 Ising Model 1 Ising 1 Ising Model N Ising (σ i = ±1) (Free
More information42 3 u = (37) MeV/c 2 (3.4) [1] u amu m p m n [1] m H [2] m p = (4) MeV/c 2 = (13) u m n = (4) MeV/c 2 =
3 3.1 3.1.1 kg m s J = kg m 2 s 2 MeV MeV [1] 1MeV=1 6 ev = 1.62 176 462 (63) 1 13 J (3.1) [1] 1MeV/c 2 =1.782 661 731 (7) 1 3 kg (3.2) c =1 MeV (atomic mass unit) 12 C u = 1 12 M(12 C) (3.3) 41 42 3 u
More informationAharonov-Bohm(AB) S 0 1/ 2 1/ 2 S t = 1/ 2 1/2 1/2 1/, (12.1) 2 1/2 1/2 *1 AB ( ) 0 e iθ AB S AB = e iθ, AB 0 θ 2π ϕ = e ϕ (ϕ ) ϕ
1 13 6 8 3.6.3 - Aharonov-BohmAB) S 1/ 1/ S t = 1/ 1/ 1/ 1/, 1.1) 1/ 1/ *1 AB ) e iθ AB S AB = e iθ, AB θ π ϕ = e ϕ ϕ ) ϕ 1.) S S ) e iθ S w = e iθ 1.3) θ θ AB??) S t = 4 sin θ 1 + e iθ AB e iθ AB + e
More information[ ] = L [δ (D ) (x )] = L D [g ] = L D [E ] = L Table : ħh = m = D D, V (x ) = g δ (D ) (x ) E g D E (Table )D = Schrödinger (.3)D = (regularization)
. D............................................... : E = κ ............................................ 3.................................................
More information1: 3.3 1/8000 1/ m m/s v = 2kT/m = 2RT/M k R 8.31 J/(K mole) M 18 g 1 5 a v t πa 2 vt kg (
1905 1 1.1 0.05 mm 1 µm 2 1 1 2004 21 2004 7 21 2005 web 2 [1, 2] 1 1: 3.3 1/8000 1/30 3 10 10 m 3 500 m/s 4 1 10 19 5 6 7 1.2 3 4 v = 2kT/m = 2RT/M k R 8.31 J/(K mole) M 18 g 1 5 a v t πa 2 vt 6 6 10
More informationt = h x z z = h z = t (x, z) (v x (x, z, t), v z (x, z, t)) ρ v x x + v z z = 0 (1) 2-2. (v x, v z ) φ(x, z, t) v x = φ x, v z
I 1 m 2 l k 2 x = 0 x 1 x 1 2 x 2 g x x 2 x 1 m k m 1-1. L x 1, x 2, ẋ 1, ẋ 2 ẋ 1 x = 0 1-2. 2 Q = x 1 + x 2 2 q = x 2 x 1 l L Q, q, Q, q M = 2m µ = m 2 1-3. Q q 1-4. 2 x 2 = h 1 x 1 t = 0 2 1 t x 1 (t)
More informationδ ij δ ij ˆx ˆx ŷ ŷ ẑ ẑ 0, ˆx ŷ ŷ ˆx ẑ, ŷ ẑ ẑ ŷ ẑ, ẑ ˆx ˆx ẑ ŷ, a b a x ˆx + a y ŷ + a z ẑ b x ˆx + b
23 2 2.1 n n r x, y, z ˆx ŷ ẑ 1 a a x ˆx + a y ŷ + a z ẑ 2.1.1 3 a iˆx i. 2.1.2 i1 i j k e x e y e z 3 a b a i b i i 1, 2, 3 x y z ˆx i ˆx j δ ij, 2.1.3 n a b a i b i a i b i a x b x + a y b y + a z b
More information1 (Contents) (4) Why Has the Superstring Theory Collapsed? Noboru NAKANISHI 2 2. A Periodic Potential Problem
7 1 2017 3 2017 3 18 1 (Contents) 1. 2 2. (4) 13 3. 1 20 4. 25 5. 28 6. 29 1. Why Has the Superstring Theory Collapsed? Noboru NAKANISHI 2 2. A Periodic Potential Problem in Quantum Mechanics (4) Kenji
More informationUndulator.dvi
X X 1 1 2 Free Electron Laser: FEL 2.1 2 2 3 SACLA 4 SACLA [1]-[6] [7] 1: S N λ [9] XFEL OHO 13 X [8] 2 2.1 2(a) (c) z y y (a) S N 90 λ u 4 [10, 11] Halbach (b) 2: (a) (b) (c) (c) 1 2 [11] B y = n=1 B
More informationd (i) (ii) 1 Georges[2] Maier [3] [1] ω = 0 1
16 5 19 10 d (i) (ii) 1 Georges[2] Maier [3] 2 10 1 [1] ω = 0 1 [4, 5] Dynamical Mean-Field Theory (DMFT) [2] DMFT I CPA [10] CPA CPA Σ(z) z CPA Σ(z) Σ(z) Σ(z) z - CPA Σ(z) DMFT Σ(z) CPA [6] 3 1960 [7]
More information5 1.2, 2, d a V a = M (1.2.1), M, a,,,,, Ω, V a V, V a = V + Ω r. (1.2.2), r i 1, i 2, i 3, i 1, i 2, i 3, A 2, A = 3 A n i n = n=1 da = 3 = n=1 3 n=1
4 1 1.1 ( ) 5 1.2, 2, d a V a = M (1.2.1), M, a,,,,, Ω, V a V, V a = V + Ω r. (1.2.2), r i 1, i 2, i 3, i 1, i 2, i 3, A 2, A = 3 A n i n = n=1 da = 3 = n=1 3 n=1 da n i n da n i n + 3 A ni n n=1 3 n=1
More information1. 1.1....................... 1.2............................ 1.3.................... 1.4.................. 2. 2.1.................... 2.2..................... 2.3.................... 3. 3.1.....................
More informationGinzburg-Landau A A Kyoto Univ. Kobe Design Univ. A N. Tsukamoto, H. Fujisaka, K. Ouchi A Ginzburg-Landau ψ = ψ + (1 + ic 1 ) 2 ψ (1 + ic 2 ) ψ 2 ψ (1
Ginzburg-Landau A A Kyoto Univ. Kobe Design Univ. A N. Tsukamoto, H. Fujisaka, K. Ouchi A Ginzburg-Landau ψ = ψ + (1 + ic 1 ) 2 ψ (1 + ic 2 ) ψ 2 ψ (1) Hopf [1] c 1, c 2 (1) { } ψ n+1 (r) = dr J(r r )ψ
More information,,,17,,, ( ),, E Q [S T F t ] < S t, t [, T ],,,,,,,,
14 5 1 ,,,17,,,194 1 4 ( ),, E Q [S T F t ] < S t, t [, T ],,,,,,,, 1 4 1.1........................................ 4 5.1........................................ 5.........................................
More informationChadwick [ 1 ] 1919,, electron number Q kinetic energy [MeV] 8.1: 8.1, 1 internal conversion electron E γ E e =
8 8.1 8.1.1 1 Chadwick [ 1 ] 1919,, electron number Q 0.0 0. 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 kinetic energy [MeV] 8.1: 8.1, 1 internal conversion electron E γ E e = E γ φ φ E e X 153 154 8, 3 H 3 He, ( ) 3 H( 1 ) 3 He(
More information18 2 F 12 r 2 r 1 (3) Coulomb km Coulomb M = kg F G = ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 = [N]. Coulomb
r 1 r 2 r 1 r 2 2 Coulomb Gauss Coulomb 2.1 Coulomb 1 2 r 1 r 2 1 2 F 12 2 1 F 21 F 12 = F 21 = 1 4πε 0 1 2 r 1 r 2 2 r 1 r 2 r 1 r 2 (2.1) Coulomb ε 0 = 107 4πc 2 =8.854 187 817 10 12 C 2 N 1 m 2 (2.2)
More information15_15KEK
25, Nov. 24th - - T. Hyodo, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 3345 (23) T. Hyodo, Phys. ev. Lett., 322 (23) - - - Λ(45) Y. Kamiya, T. Hyodo, arxiv:59.46 [hep-ph] K or N 2 イントロダクション ハドロンの構造とエキゾチック状態 ハドロンの分類 観測されているハドロン
More informationBlack-Scholes [1] Nelson [2] Schrödinger 1 Black Scholes [1] Black-Scholes Nelson [2][3][4] Schrödinger Nelson Parisi Wu [5] Nelson Parisi-W
003 7 14 Black-Scholes [1] Nelson [] Schrödinger 1 Black Scholes [1] Black-Scholes Nelson [][3][4] Schrödinger Nelson Parisi Wu [5] Nelson Parisi-Wu Nelson e-mail: takatoshi-tasaki@nifty.com kabutaro@mocha.freemail.ne.jp
More information77
O r r r, F F r,r r = r r F = F (. ) r = r r 76 77 d r = F d r = F (. ) F + F = 0 d ( ) r + r = 0 (. 3) M = + MR = r + r (. 4) P G P MX = + MY = + MZ = z + z PG / PG = / M d R = 0 (. 5) 78 79 d r = F d
More informationOTO研究会スライド
OTO @, 2017 5 26 2 CFT OTO ) PTEP 2016 (2016) no.11, 113B06 (arxiv1602.06542[hep-th]) Collaboration with P. Caputa(YITP) and A.Veliz-Osorio(Queen Mary U.) i i +1 H = X i i z z i+1 + h X i i x i z = 1
More informationL. S. Abstract. Date: last revised on 9 Feb translated to Japanese by Kazumoto Iguchi. Original papers: Received May 13, L. Onsager and S.
L. S. Abstract. Date: last revised on 9 Feb 01. translated to Japanese by Kazumoto Iguchi. Original papers: Received May 13, 1953. L. Onsager and S. Machlup, Fluctuations and Irreversibel Processes, Physical
More information