ヘドニック法による芸術・文化資本の便益評価

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "ヘドニック法による芸術・文化資本の便益評価"

ゆああくや
7 years ago
Views:

1 Kwansei Gakuin University Rep Title ヘドニック法による芸術文化資本の便益評価 Author(s) Hayashi, Yuki, 林, 勇貴 Citation 関西学院経済学研究, 44: Issue Date 2013 URL Right

2 Estimating the Benefits of Art and Cultural Capital by the Hedonic Method Art and cultural capital have both private and public good aspects, and the vagueness inherent in is evaluation has been a crucial issue in planning cultural policies. For this reason, the purpose of this paper is to quantify increases in neighborhood desirability attributable to a new museum by using the hedonic method. This paper focuses on the impacts of opening of the Kobe City Museum and estimates the benefit from the higher land prices that people are prepared to pay. As a result, the museum is clearly producing something valuable for its neighborhood, and increased distance between a specific property and the museum is associated with a decrease in land price. Therefore, the impact decreases with distance from the museum. Consequently, the museum is an important source that benefits the community as a whole. Yuki Hayashi JEL H41, Z18 Keywords hedonic method, art and cultural capital, museum, indirect benefit, land price 1. はじめに 23 61

3 contingent valuation method CVM CVM travel cost method TCM hedonic approach CVM TCM , Historic St. Mary s City Poor and Smith 2004 Alberini and Longo

4 CVM GIS Clark and Kahn Halsey Moro et al Sheppard 2010 Sheppard Rosen

5 44 3 Sheppard ヘドニック法の理論 4 Rosen z i z c U = U(c; Z) 2 1 I = c + P(Z) Throsby Clark and Kahn

6 P(Z) I i P i (Z) Ui U c 2 3 z i c z i z i WTP bit price Z WTP µ u Z µ(z ; I; u ) u = U(I µ(z ; I; u ); Z ) @c Ui U c µ i z i c z i 1 6 P

7 44 z i z 0 i [p 0 p ] WTP [p 0 p ] [p 00 p ] [p 0 p ] 7 2 図 1 付け値と市場価格の変化 Sheppard 2010 WTP WTP

8 図 2 p 00 と p 0 の差 3. 代理指標の選択 Halsey Sheppard 2010 Moro et al Sheppard 2013 Clark and Kahn Schmidt and Courant Roback 1982 Rosen Clark and Kahn

9 44 Blomquist et al Graves 2011 Sheppard 2013 Sheppard V 3 3 E 0 ^V (w 1 ; r 1 ) 9 68

10 c ^c E 0 E 1 (w 2 ; r 2 ) a b r 0 r 2 c d 図 3 賃金と賃貸料の関係 10 Sheppard Roback 1982 Graves 2011 c 69

11 44 4. 実証分析 4.1. 推定モデル pre post Halsey 2005 Sheppard 2013 Halsey 2005 post pre post pre effect pre post effect post post effect pre 4 3 P distance = 1 D 2 1 M D 4 3 D M pre 0 post 1 post 0 70

12 P distance = 1 D 4 4 pre 4 3 effect = 2 1 M D 4 5 D OLS semi log double log semi log Box Cox Box Cox 2002double log semi log semi log Halsey 2005semi log double log Schmidt and Courant 2006 semi log Moro et al. 2011semi log double log Sheppard 2013 double log Box Cox 71

13 ln(p) = C + P ix i + P ± i z i + 1 D 2 # 1 M D ; 4 6 i i ± i i 4.2. 変数の選択 4 6 GIS pre 83 post

14 ,100 m 32,000 m 150,690 m 20.0km 1.3km ,042 表 1 16 地域形成要因の基本統計量 m km pre m m m % % % 54 40% 22 16% 49 36% MANDARA 3 pre 1 M D post M

15 ヘドニック価格関数の推定 % kmpre 表 2 主成分分析の結果 m % 76.97% 85.69% 74

16 4 7 ln(p) = 5:5844 0:0222 ( 主成分 1) 0:0362 ( 主成分 2)+ 0:0609 ( 主成分 3) (86.9) ( 4.4) ( 2.2) (2.5) 0:0969 D 0:5357 # 1 M ( 12.0) ( 3.4) D ; 4 7 adjr t 1 CBD central business district 2 3 km semi log pre j P j pre P j post D j 0:535=D j ln(p j post =Pj pre) Sheppard 2010 Sheppard 2013 pre 75

17 44 図 4 神戸市立博物館建設の便益と距離の関係 1.5km km むすび ,

18 2003 Moro et al 参考文献 ISFJ

19 CVM TCM http: utsunomiya.tochigi.jp dbps data material localhost sougouseisaku shiseikenkyucenter H22bunkakaikan.pdf Blomquist, C. Glenn, Mark G. Berger and John P. Hoehn 1988 New Estimates of Quality of Life in Urban Areas, American Economic Review, Vol.78, No.1, pp

20 Alberini and Longo 2005 The Value of Cultural Heritage Sites in Armenia: Evidence from a Travel Cost Method Study, Nota di Lavoro, No.112. Clark, D. E. & Kahn, J. R The social bene ts of urban cultural amenities, Journal of Regional Science, Vol.28, No.3, pp Graves E. Philip 2011 The Hedonic Method: Value of Statistical Life, Wage Compensation, and Property Value Compensation, Research Tools in Natural Resource and Environmental Economics, Chapter7, pp Halsey Micah 2005 Economic Impact Analysis of Cultural Institutions: A Comparison of Mass MoCA and the Dia: Beacon Riggio Galleries WILLIAMS COLLEGE, May. Moro Mirko et al Ranking quality of life using subjective well being data, Ecological Economics, Vol.65, No.3, pp Does the housing market reflect cultural heritage A case study of Greater Dublin, Stirling Economics Discussion Paper, Vol.7, May. Poor and Smith 2004 Travel Cost Analysis of a Cultural Heritage Site: The Case of Historic St. Mary's City of Maryland, Journal of Cultural Economics, Vol.28, No.3, pp Roback Jennifer 1982 Wages, Rents, and the Quality of Life, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.99, No.6, Dec, pp Rosen Sherwin 1974 Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol.82, No.1, pp Schmidt, L. and Courant, P.N Sometimes close is good enough: The value of nearby environmental amenities, Journal of Regional Science, Vol.46, No.5, pp Sheppard Stephen 2010 Measuring the impact of culture using hedonic analysis, C3D Publications Museums in the Neighborhood: the local economic impact of museums, Handbook of Economic Geography and Industry Studies, Chapter.8. Throsby David 2001 Economics and Culture, Cambridge University Press. 79

21 44 参考資料 http: webland servlet MainServlet http: b menu toukei chousa02 shakai 1981 No No.4475 付録 80

And Business

Discussion Papers In Economics And Business Discussion Paper 03-06 Graduate School of Economics and Osaka School of International Public Policy (OSIPP) Osaka University, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, JAPAN