Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

Similar documents

Table 1 Means and standard deviations of topic familiarity for the topics used in the study Note. standard deviations are in parenthesis.


The Japanese Journal of Psychology 2000, Vol. 71, No. 3, Emotion recognition: Facial components associated with various emotions Ken Gouta and

Perrett et al.,,,, Fig.,, E I, 76

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

Counterfactual Thinking in Simulated Situations: Failing a job-interview Kaori MASAMOTO Counterfactual thinking: This study investigates counterfactua

Jpn. J. Personality 18(2): (2009)

2 251 Barrera, 1986; Barrera, e.g., Gottlieb, 1985 Wethington & Kessler 1986 r Cohen & Wills,

THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY 2007, Vol. 15 No. 2, 217–227


Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology


02[ ]小山・池田(責)岩.indd

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

e.g., Mahoney, Vandell, Simpkins, & Zarrett, Bohnert, Fredricks, & Randall2010 breadth intensitydurationengagement e.g., Mahone

CMCの社会的ネットワークを介した社会的スキルと孤独感との関連性

untitled

Ｈｕｍａｎ　Ｗｅｌｆａｒｅ　８‐１☆／５．林

2 94

untitled


2 1 ( ) 2 ( ) i

25 D Effects of viewpoints of head mounted wearable 3D display on human task performance

J53-01

Adult Attachment Projective AAP PARS PARS PARS PARS Table

27 VR Effects of the position of viewpoint on self body in VR environment

‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹

untitled

56 pp , 2005 * ******* *** ** CA CAMA

＠０８４７００３０ヨコ／篠塚・窪田　２２１号

The Japanese Journal of Health Psychology, 29(S): (2017)

02’ÓŠ¹/“Hfi¡

’V‰K2.ren

untitled

A Study of Effective Application of CG Multimedia Contents for Help of Understandings of the Working Principles of the Internal Combustion Engine (The


24 Depth scaling of binocular stereopsis by observer s own movements

新垣・都築２７‐４３／２７‐４３

) 2) , , ) 1 2 Q1 / Q2 Q Q4 /// Q5 Q6 3,4 Q7 5, Q8 HP Q9 Q10 13 Q11

01_渡部先生_21-2.indd

Yamagata Journal of Health Sciences, Vol. 16, 2013 Tamio KEITOKU 1 2 Katsuko TANNO 3 Kiyoko ARIMA 4 Noboru CHIBA 1 Abstract The present study aimed to

Studies of Foot Form for Footwear Design (Part 9) : Characteristics of the Foot Form of Young and Elder Women Based on their Sizes of Ball Joint Girth


パーソナリティ研究 2005 第13巻　第2号　170–182

untitled

佐山七生.indd

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1990, Vol. 61, No. 3, The effects of a recipient's openness and conveyance to a third party of the self-dis

,,.,,.,..,.,,,.,, Aldous,.,,.,,.,,, NPO,,.,,,,,,.,,,,.,,,,..,,,,.,

日本感性工学会論文誌


,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 976%, i

56 56 The Development of Preschool Children s Views About Conflict Resolution With Peers : Diversity of changes from five-year-olds to six-year-olds Y

75 Author s Address: Possibility of Spatial Frequency Analysis of the Three-dimensional Appearance and Texture of Facial Skin


蝨ｰ蝓溯・豐ｻ縺ｨ繧ｳ繝溘Η繝九ユ繧｣蠖｢謌舌↓髢｢縺吶ｋ螳滓・隱ｿ譟ｻ・域擲莠ｬ迚茨ｼ峨€仙悸邵ｮ縺ｪ縺励€・indd

220 28;29) 30 35) 26;27) % 8.0% 9 36) 8) 14) 37) O O 13 2 E S % % 2 6 1fl 2fl 3fl 3 4

J. Jpn. Acad. Nurs. Sci., Vol.25, No.1, pp.13-22, 2005 Decision Making under the Uncertainty; Process of Decision from Diagnosis to Preventive- Operat


Fig. 2 Signal plane divided into cell of DWT Fig. 1 Schematic diagram for the monitoring system

, 2001, 1, Japanese Journal of Interpersonal and Social Psychology, 2001, No. 1, ) Aron, Dutton, Aron, & Iverson Sprecher

スポーツ教育学研究（2013. Vol.33, No1, pp.1-13）

language anxiety :, language-skill-specific anxiety Cheng, Horwitz, & Schallert, Horwitz et al. Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety ScaleFLCAS Young, ;

０８０１３９１，繊維学会ファイバ１２月号／報文－０１－西川

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

Flavell et al. () 111

日本感性工学会論文誌

.,,,.,,,,,.,,,, Inoue,.,,,,.,.,,.,,,.,.,,,.,,,,,.,,.,,.,,,.,,,,

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1984, Vol. 55, No. 3, Effects of self-disclosure on interpersonal attraction Masahiko Nakamura (Department

Jpn. J. Personality 19(2): (2010)

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1989, Vol. 60, No. 4, Changes of body sensation through muscular relaxation: Using the method of measuring


untitled

21 Effects of background stimuli by changing speed color matching color stimulus

橡石本・図表切り貼り版2.PDF

Ⅱ. 用語の操作的定義 Ⅲ. 対象と方法 1. 対象 WAM NET 2. 調査期間 : 3. 調査方法 4. 調査内容 5. 分析方法 FisherMann-Whitney U Kruskal-Wallis SPSS. for Windows 6. 倫理的配慮 Vol. No.


A 18 B 6 AB p >0.05 A1A2B1B2 A3B3 t p > ο =0 1 =12 =2 0 ο14 10=0ο= ο144 0 ο4041ο64 65ο144 WAIS R Wilcoxon

わが国における女性管理職研究の展望 Research on Women in Management Positions in Japan Kieko HORII 5 Abstract Japanese society is struggling with a low percentage of wo

Oda

A Study on Throw Simulation for Baseball Pitching Machine with Rollers and Its Optimization Shinobu SAKAI*5, Yuichiro KITAGAWA, Ryo KANAI and Juhachi

Elmore & Pohlmann Greenwood & Ramagli a b c a b c

評論・社会科学　８４号（よこ）（Ｐ）／３．金子

日本人の子育て観－JGSS-2008 データに見る社会の育児能力に対する評価－



untitled

Vol. 51 No (2000) Thermo-Physiological Responses of the Foot under C Thermal Conditions Fusako IWASAKI, Yuri NANAMEKI,* Tomoko KOSHIB

Hohenegger & Schär, a cm b Kitoh et. al., Gigerenzer et. al. Susan et. al.

, 11, ) 2) () () 1 2 = (, 2001) ( ) %13% (Pyon, 2000) 2% (, 2000) ( ) Kim(2003) (, 2006)

早期教育の効果に関する調査（II）－親子の意識と学習状況の分析を中心に－

Visual Evaluation of Polka-dot Patterns Yoojin LEE and Nobuko NARUSE * Granduate School of Bunka Women's University, and * Faculty of Fashion Science,

技術研究報告第２６号



九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 看護師の勤務体制による睡眠実態についての調査 岩下, 智香九州大学医学部保健学科看護学専攻 出版情報 : 九州大学医学部保健学

<4D F736F F D2094AD92428CA48B CB B4C92C789C1816A462E646F63>

JOURNAL OF THE JAPANESE ASSOCIATION FOR PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY VOL. 66, NO. 6 (Nov., 2001) (Received August 10, 2001; accepted November 9, 2001) Alterna

The 18th Game Programming Workshop ,a) 1,b) 1,c) 2,d) 1,e) 1,f) Adapting One-Player Mahjong Players to Four-Player Mahjong

Transcription:

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology 2015, Vol. 41, No. 1, 39 55 * ** The Effects of Makeup on People s Impressions Noriko KUSHIMA* and Isamu SAITO* This study examined the effects of makeup and facial features when forming impressions of people. The dimensions of maturity and sexual dimorphism were applied as criteria for women s facial features and makeup. In a preliminary study, a prototype face was made and four types of faces were prepared by arranging the prototype face s parts to make faces of different maturity and sexuality. In Study 1, based on a prepared prototype face, face illustrations with four types of makeup were prepared. Examination of the impressions of these faces showed that makeup influenced impressions. In Study 2, facial features in the preliminary study and makeup in Study 1 were combined to examine the effects on interpersonal impressions. The results showed that makeup that resembled the prototype were highly evaluated in terms of personality, intelligence and feminism. Immature and feminine makeup created younger impressions, while masculine type makeup created an intelligent impression. Different impressions were projected according to makeup, suggesting that interpersonal impression management was possible through use of makeup. key words: makeup, facial features, interpersonal impression, maturity, sexuality 1 Cox & Glick, 1986; Graham & Furnham, 1981; 1989; Workman & Johnson, 1991 Dion, Berscheid, & Walster, 1972; 1989 1993 1. 2. 3. Cunningham, 1986; 2001 1993; 2001a; 2001b * 4 2 16 Osaki Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141 8602, Japan e-mail: ricokushima@gmail.com ** 4 2 16 Osaki Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 141 8602, Japan

40 Vol. 41, No. 1 Cox & Glick, 1986; Graham & Furnham, 1981; 1989; Workman & Johnson, 1991 (1998) A a 1 2 4 4 1993 Cabeza, Bruce, Kato, & Oda (1999) Valentine & Bruce (1986a, 1986b) Valentine (1991) 2008; 1997; Takano, Abe, & Kobayashi, 1996; 1993 1993; 2001 1993; 2001 2 2 4 Y X (Figure 1) 2 1 2 3 4 1) 2001 (2001) Figure 1

41 Cabeza et al. (1999) 1. Paquet (1997) (2005), (2007) (Figure 2) 1 1.2, 1.35, 1.4 (14), 1.6 (18) 2 1 1.35 2010 12 2011 11 20 22 M 27.32 SD 2.85 20 1 1.35 1 1.35 1 1.35 2) http://www.businessinsider.com/faces-of-tomorrow- 2011-2?op 1 http://womanhealth-lab.com/old/experts/exmukaida/ index.html Figure 2 Table 1 M SD 18.00 21.00 19.66.73 n 22 13.50 15.50 14.48.55 n 22 1.20 1.60 1.35.08 n 22 (Table 1) 3 2005;2007; Paquet, 1997 5 2005; 2007 2005;2007 10 2007 1 3 5 1 2005; 2007 3

42 Vol. 41, No. 1 5 1 2005; 2007 3 1 1 3 1 1.5 2007 2. 4 4 (Figure 2) 100 4 1 2 3 4 159 48 111 M 19.63 SD 1.45 5 450 3 5 5 4 1 5 5 5 5 2.91 (SD.64), 2.36 (SD.78) (F(4, 158) 3.02, p.05) 300 5 5 3 4 1 1. 11 (1993) 40 10 (1993) 1 11 5 1. 5. 2. 24 (1993) 4 4 16 (2008) 16 5 * * (2008) (1993) Takano et al. (1996) 2 (2012) 1 24 24 5 1. 5. 3. (2012)

43 Figure 3 5 3 (1) (2) (3) 3 5 1. 5. 5 5 Figure 3 1 2 3 4 5 1 Cunningham, 1986; 2001 1996; 2013 Cunningham, 1986; 2001; 1996; 1993; 2009; 2007; 2010; Zebrowitz, 1999 2011

44 Vol. 41, No. 1 2001 2007; 2009; 2008 1. 4 3 5 100 0, 5 15 (Figure 4) 2. Figure 4 100Figure 4 118 82 3. Figure 4 4 3 5 75 10 4. 4 4 5. 4 10 158 55 103 M 19.43 SD 1.92 1 4 A4

45 Figure 6 1 Table 2 Figure 5 1 4 4 4 700 400 (Figure 5) 1 m n( ) 96 (51.3) 62 (33.2) 17 ( 9.1) 12 ( 6.4) 2 m n( ) 63 (33.7) 99 (52.9) 12 ( 6.4) 13 ( 7.0) 3 m n( ) 14 ( 7.5) 14 ( 7.5) 88 (47.1) 71 (38.0) 4 m n( ) 14 (7.5) 19 (10.2) 66 (35.3) 88 (47.1) χ 2 101.62** 114.24** 94.86** 83.73** df 3 3 3 3 alpha.05 **p.01 1 2** 2 1** 3 1** 4 1** 1 3** 2 3** 3 2** 4 2** 1 4** 2 4** 3 4 ns 4 3 ns 4 4 1 4 1 4 (Table 2) 1 4 4 25 163 48 114 M 19.46 SD.88 4 5 700 400 A4 5 (Figure 6) 5 4 4 1 11 24 3 4) 5 5 4 1 5 5 5 5 3.13 (SD.66), 2.7 (SD.53) (F(4, 161) 2.44, p.05)

46 Vol. 41, No. 1 Figure 7 4 5 4 4 11 24 3 4 5 4 4 Figure 7 1 2 3 4 4 Table 3 Promax α.82.10.03.09.88.78.03.04.00.71.04.01.13.68.16.08.10.03.69.02.19.79.00.68.03.19.21.60.26.08.14.53.20.08.06.02.71.11.72.13.19.65.10.02.35.57.16.31.21.55.03.09.17.49.17.07.05.08.74.75.02.17.09.69.59.25.63.19.25.40 4 24 Table 3 4

47 Table 4 m m m m F M 3.14 4.36 3.74 2.95 2.06 F(4, 644) 255.56*** m m m m SD.80.63.66.81.73 m m m n 162 162 162 162 162 m m m M 3.23 3.57 3.15 2.49 1.83 F(4, 628) 76.41*** m m m SD.86.78.75.72.66 m m n 158 158 158 158 158 m m m m m M 2.63 3.14 3.61 3.57 3.40 F(4, 640) 48.27*** m m SD.65.79.68.75.84 m m n 161 161 161 161 161 m m M 2.83 4.38 4.11 3.25 2.82 F(4, 644) 132.77*** m m m m SD.89.72.80 1.03 1.09 m m m n 162 162 162 162 162 m m ***p.001 m; m; m; m; m 1 2 * * 3 4 * 4.40 (Table 4)4 5 4 2 2 1 16 4 4 4 4

48 Vol. 41, No. 1 Figure 8 2 Figure 9 2 Figure 10 2 Figure 11 2 16 1 915 634 279 2 M 19.68 SD 1.39 Figures 8 11 4 4 6 1 700 400 A4 6 1 Figure 1 11 24 3 6 5 4 232 164 67 1 M 19.71 SD 1.39 232 154 78 M 19.66 SD 1.34 228 157 70 1 M 19.65 SD 1.40 223 159 64 M 19.73 SD 1.45 4 4 4 6 4 4 4 1 2 3 4 (Figure 12) 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

49 Figure 12 4 1 2 3 4 4 4 1 6 (F(5, 1070) 143.579, p.001) 4 (F(3, 642) 51.525, p.001) (F(15, 3210) 60.514, p.001) Table 5 4 6 (F(5, 1070) 49.030, p.001) 4 (F(3, 642) 67.964, p.001) (F(15, 3210) 86.560, p.001) Table 6 4 6 (F(5, 1040) 45.855, p.001) 4 (F(3, 624) 57.403, p.001) (F(15, 3120) 84.745, p.001) Table 7

50 Vol. 41, No. 1 Table 5 m m m m F M 2.99 3.26 3.70 3.76 2.86 2.56 F(5, 1125) 90.79*** m m m SD.89.86.76.80.69.82 m m m m m n 226 226 226 226 226 226 m m m M 2.67 3.12 3.44 3.34 2.80 2.50 F(5, 1005) 61.32*** m m m SD.74.78.71.79.69.74 m m m m m n 222 222 222 222 222 222 m m M 2.93 2.93 3.75 3.20 3.13 3.27 F(5, 1125) 90.79*** m m m m SD.70.71.66.68.60.67 m m m n 223 223 223 223 223 223 m M 2.21 2.91 4.12 3.96 3.56 3.52 F(5, 1120) 161.09*** m m m SD.87.65.75 1.26.80.88 m m m m n 225 225 225 225 225 225 m ***p.001 Table 6 m m m m F M 3.17 3.23 3.40 3.52 2.86 2.74 F(5, 1110) 36.81*** m m m SD.87.87.86.87.69.80 m m m m m n 223 223 223 223 223 223 m m M 3.07 3.03 2.91 3.04 2.60 2.39 F(5, 1115) 37.68*** m m SD.78.79.78.81.72.70 m m m m m n 224 224 224 224 224 224 m m m m m M 2.88 2.94 3.54 3.00 3.40 3.55 F(5, 1130) 56.62*** m m m SD.65.67.70.75.70.78 m m m m m n 227 227 227 227 227 227 M 2.52 2.54 3.97 3.89 3.56 3.60 F(5, 1120) 161.09*** m m m SD.95.97.78.82.91.94 m m m m n 228 228 228 228 228 228 m ***p.001 4 6 (F(5, 1030) 37.958, p.001) 4 F(3, 618) 58.537, p.001 (F(15, 3090) 68.276, p.001) Table 8

51 Table 7 m m m m F M 3.05 3.28 3.55 3.49 2.91 2.37 F(5, 1110) 78.39*** m m m SD.84.80.89.91.76.83 m m m m m n 223 223 223 223 223 223 m m m M 3.17 3.28 2.80 2.93 2.39 2.06 F(5, 1090) 97.50*** m m m m SD.81.80.81.80.68.76 m m m m m m m n 219 219 219 219 219 219 m m m m m M 3.01 2.96 3.39 3.01 3.20 3.24 F(5, 1090) 17.53*** m m m SD.71.65.72.68.68.79 m m m m n 219 219 219 219 219 219 M 2.66 2.66 3.73 3.73 3.58 3.37 F(5, 1120) 74.48*** m m SD.98.95.84.92.93 1.04 m m m m n 225 225 225 225 225 225 m ***p.001 Table 8 m m m m F M 3.20 3.18 3.41 3.40 2.98 2.80 F(5, 1085) 25.66*** m m m SD.69.69.81.77.76.85 m m m m m n 218 218 218 218 218 218 m M 3.60 3.13 2.58 2.79 2.40 2.28 F(5, 1075) 115.25*** m m m m SD.79.75.73.70.66.79 m m m m m m m m n 216 216 216 216 216 216 m m m M 3.11 3.11 3.44 3.33 3.27 2.84 F(5, 1085) 30.07*** m m m SD.61.60.69.63.61.70 m m m m n 218 218 218 218 218 218 m M 2.92 2.37 3.42 3.53 3.49 2.97 F(5, 1085) 54.31*** m m SD 1.04.83.98.94.95 1.07 m m m m n 218 218 218 218 218 218 m ***p.001 3 4 6 (1) (2) (3)

52 Vol. 41, No. 1 Table 9 m m m m F M 2.85 3.28 4.11 3.87 3.14 2.74 F(5, 1130) 67.29*** m m m SD 1.26 1.29 1.05 1.22 1.20 1.30 m m m n 227 227 227 227 227 227 m M 2.13 2.35 3.88 3.62 2.80 2.62 F(5, 810) 74.80*** m m m SD 1.15 1.16 1.16 1.26 1.23 1.26 m m m m m n 163 163 163 163 163 163 m M 2.06 2.77 4.30 3.84 2.72 1.87 F(5, 315) 61.61*** m m m SD.87 1.15 1.03 1.25 1.16.98 m m m m n 64 64 64 64 64 64 m m ***p.001 Table 10 m m m m F M 3.11 3.22 3.61 3.46 3.11 2.97 F(5, 1145) 14.26*** m m m SD 1.20 1.17 1.21 1.33 1.19 1.22 m m m n 230 230 230 230 230 230 M 2.19 2.35 3.23 2.97 2.69 2.53 F(5, 745) 20.85*** m m m SD 1.20 1.28 1.46 1.49 1.31 1.35 m m m n 150 150 150 150 150 150 M 2.73 2.81 3.85 3.57 2.84 2.68 F(5, 390) 16.86*** m m m SD 1.15 1.12 1.17 1.22 1.11 1.27 m m m n 79 79 79 79 79 79 ***p.001 Tables 9 12 4 6 3 4 1 2 2

53 Table 11 m m m m F M 3.13 3.27 3.59 3.41 2.91 2.36 F(5, 1115) 44.29*** m m m SD 1.18 1.16 1.26 1.24 1.16 1.19 m m m m m n 224 224 224 224 224 224 m m m M 2.28 2.32 3.00 2.82 2.32 1.95 F(5, 770) 23.16*** m m m SD 1.18 1.15 1.41 1.37 1.22 1.18 m m m m n 155 155 155 155 155 155 m m M 2.80 2.57 3.68 3.42 2.86 1.86 F(5, 340) 26.41*** m m m SD 1.22 1.06 1.25 1.30 1.18 1.02 m m m m n 69 69 69 69 69 69 m m ***p.001 Table 12 m m m m F M 3.45 3.06 3.35 3.39 2.87 2.47 F(5, 1090) 34.69*** m m SD 1.14 1.11 1.25 1.24 1.18 1.25 m m m m m m n 219 219 219 219 219 219 m m m M 2.68 2.10 2.72 2.90 2.46 2.01 F(5, 775) 21.65*** m m m SD 1.28 1.04 1.33 1.39 1.24 1.11 m m m n 156 156 156 156 156 156 m m M 3.48 2.32 3.43 3.56 2.65 1.71 F(5, 310) 41.01*** m m m SD 1.31.93 1.33 1.24 1.05.85 m m m m m n 63 63 63 63 63 63 m m m ***p.001 1997 1993; 2001a, 2001b 2 Cunningham, 1986; 2001

54 Vol. 41, No. 1 Cunningham et al., 1995; 1989 (1998) 1 2 2008 8, 87 96. 2009 9, 111 118. 2007 31, 157 162. BUSINESS INSIDER 2011 What The Average Person Looks Like In Every Country BUSINESS INSIDER 2011 2 10 http://www.businessinsider.com/faces-oftomorrow-2011-2?op 1#ixzz3FL5AUS92 Cabeza, R., Bruce, V., Kato, T., & Oda, M. 1999 The prototype effect in face recognition: Extension and limits. Memory & Cognition, 27, 139 151. Cox, C. L., & Glick, W. H. 1986 Resume evaluations and cosmetics use: When more is not better. Sex Roles, 14, 51 58. Cunningham, M. R. 1986 Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi-Experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 925 935. Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., Perri, B., & Cheng-Huan, W. 1995 Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 261 279. 1997 1998 62 33. 2001 pp. 34 46. Dion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. 1972 What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285 290. 1993 pp. 170 196. Graham, J. A., & Furnham, A. F. 1981 Sexual differences in attractiveness ratings of day/night cosmetic use. Cosmetic Technology, 3, 36 42. 1996 1993 pp. 46 65. 1993 57 779. 2001a

55 518 519. 2001b HIP, 101, 37, 17 22. 2012 3, 19 32. 2009 2001 pp. 48 63. 2005 5, 91 95. 1993 pp. 88 99. 2007 2007 2013 1989 15, 113 122. Paquet, D. 1997 Miroir mon beau miroir Une histoire de la beaut?. 1999 5000 2008 8, 170. 1993 pp. 124 133. Takano, R., Abe, T., & Kobayashi, N. 1996 Relationship between facial feature and perceived facial image for application to image creation using cosmetics. Proceeding of 70th Anniversary Conference on Color Materials, 188 191. 2001 pp. 90 101. 1997 61 707. 2011 111, 27 31. 2001 pp. 12 21. 1989 101 80. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. 1986a Recognizing familiar faces: The role of distinctiveness and familiarity. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 300 305. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. 1986b The effects of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces. Perception, 15, 525 535. Valentine, T. 1991 A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 43, 161 204. Workman, J. E., & Johnson, K. K. P. 1991 The role of cosmetics in impression formation. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10, 63 67. 2005 http://womanhealthlab.com/ old/experts/exmukaida/index.html 2010 Zebrowitz, L. 1997 Reading Faces: Window To The Soul? A. 1999 2014.7.16; 2014.12.16

2024 © docsplayer.net プライバシー | 利用規約 | フィードバック