20 Studies on body perception and eating behavior of university students Hitomi Fukuda, Tomoe Hirakawa and Mika Kono The relation between the body perception and eating behavior was investigated in university students. The BMI body mass index values of female students were similarly to the national average of Japanese. However, the slim sized male students BMI 18.5 was more than the national average. The most male students recognized their current body shape range similarly to the silhouette chart. However, the most female students considered that their current body shape range were higher than the average of the silhouette chart. In the slim group of male students, the percentage of those who eat breakfast every day was lower as compared to the normal group. They tended to go to bed lately, to have diet experience and to sense increased stress. 1, 2 2005 13.4 19.0 2005 7.2 22.6 2 3 4 7 8 10
2006 4 558 801 2007 4 565 835 2008 5 68 97 19 22 2008 5 Stunkard 11 Silhouette chart 1 1 100 Body Mass Index BMIKg m m BMI 18.518.5 BMI 25.025.0 χ 2 t 1 Stunkard AJ 11 1 2006 2007 2008 BMI 1 2006 2007 2008 558 801 565 835 68 97 65 8.6 78 13.8 15 22.7 428 76.7 411 72.7 40 59.1 82 14.7 76 13.5 12 18.2 126 15.7 135 16.2 21 21.6 593 74.0 631 75.6 65 67.0 82 10.2 69 8.3 11 11.3
20 12006 2007 2006 15.7 8.6 2007 16.2 13.8 2006 105 200 BMI 1 15.0 16.7 7.1 12.5 2008 21.6 22.7 p 0.01 BMI 20 1981 1985 5 17.61986 23.1 20 12 15 19 20 29 15 19 12.7 15.2 20 29 22.6 7.2 20 29 2 1 Stunkard 11 9 BMI 13 2 BMI 2.3 0.6 4.1 0.9 5.8 1.3 2.9 1.1 4.4 1.0 5.3 0.9 2 3 4 2 3 2 2.9 0.7 3.2 0.8
2 3.9 0.60 3.5 0.6 2 3 3 1 3
20 3 4 3 13 5.9 5.2 2006 15 19 14.6 13.220 29 30.6 22.5 55.9 69.1 86.8 59.886.699.0 4 85 83 87 82 64 A70 C66 14 1 60 70 2
2 18.3 10.3 23.3 9.76 28.3 13.7 17.5 12.2 21.7 7.85 28.9 12.0 11.8 4.85* 14.1 3.75* 21.3 9.32 16.0 6.15 21.5 6.70 27.7 15.4 16.2 8.89 22.7 9.38 32.2 16.2 13.3 7.34* 20.0 6.24 29.0 12.9 * p 0.01 5
20 5 6 60 5 90 80 6 20 10 20 10 6 320 g 250 g 20.076.9 58.3 81.093.7100 BMI 15 16 3 2 3 29.5 6.2 32004 2005 17 p 0.01 3 3 24.5 1.6 23.9 2.1 2006 50
3 39 7.9 76.3 73.5 15.4 10.3* 20.5 12 6.1 66.7 73.3 26.7 20.0 0 15 0* 66.7 83.3 23.1 25.0 16.7 65 27.0 82.3 90.8 23.1 26.2 40.0 11 38.1* 81.0 85.7 71.4* 23.8 17.0 21 27.3 45.5* 81.8 30.0 36.4* 63.6* * p 0.01 23 6.13 1.02 6.12 1.38 3 5.88 0.64 6.60 1.27 15 24 8.07 7.52 46 80 p 0.01 3 3 4 70 90 19.4 28.0 70 p 0.001 40 BMI 3 17
20 4 7 1 30 40 BMI 18.5 BMI 2002 14 54 58. 1998 10 46 51. 2007BMI 9, 102 110. 2005 23, 142 153. 1998 56, 347 358. 199856, 33 45. 2004
50, 355 364. 2004 22, 504 511. 2003 53, 172 178. 1993 11, 57 64. Stunkard AJ., Sorensen T., Schulsinger F. 1983 Use of the Danish adoption register for the study of obesity and thinness. The genetics of neurological and psychiatric disorders. New York. 115 120. 2008 18 Sorensen TI, Stunkard AJ, Teasdable TW 1983, Theaccuracy of reports of weight : children 7s recall of their parents 7s weights 15 years earlier, Int. J. Obes. 7, 115 122. 2000 12 98. 198745, 197 207. 1984 18 22 2005 7, 91 97. 1 1 1 2 3 4 2 a 7 0 b 1 2 c d 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 3 a 7 0 b 1 2 c d 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3
20 4 a 7 0 b 1 2 c d 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 51 2 3 61 2 3 7 1 2 8 1 2 9 1 2 10 1 2 2 1 3 2 1 4 3 1 5 4 1 11 1 2 12 1 1 2 3 4 13 1 1 2 3 14 1 2 1 2 3 cm 5 kg