text.dvi

Similar documents
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J- 9 -J-19 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN

.n.s.N.._...{.\1


株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

IT

バーリ&ミーンズの株式会社論

相互取引に伴う債権債務の依存構造を考慮した金融機関の与信評価について

Vol. 3 No (Mar. 2010) An Option Valuation Model Based on an Asset Pricing Model Incorporating Investors Beliefs Kentaro Tanaka, 1 Koich

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

商品流動性リスクの計量化に関する一考察(その2)―内生的流動性リスクを考慮したストレス・テスト―

Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89

untitled

わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―

,255 7, ,355 4,452 3,420 3,736 8,206 4, , ,992 6, ,646 4,

ir資料4 2.ai

第42巻第1号【論説】銀行経営研究序説

IS-LM (interest) 100 (net rate of interest) (rate of interest) ( ) = 100 (2.1) (gross rate of interest) ( ) = 100 (2.2)

untitled

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G


本組/根間弘海

-

07_7„”“ƒ_…p…h…b…N

1 Nelson-Siegel Nelson and Siegel(1987) 3 Nelson-Siegel 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 3 Nelson-Siegel 2 Nelson-Siegel Litterman and Scheinkman(199


Q A Q A 1



Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) (1987) (1988) 4 (2004) 5 Diamond(1965) Auerbach and Kotlikoff(1987) 1 ( ) ,

,398 4% 017,


P P P P P P P P P P P P P

03.Œk’ì

2 / 24


橡計画0.PDF

genron-3


わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

A B A E

復活だぁっ! 日本の不況と流動性トラップの逆襲

子ども・子育て支援新制度 全国総合システム(仮称)に関するインターフェース仕様書 市町村・都道府県編(初版)

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

初級/発刊に寄せて・改定にあたって(第2次)

No

「国債の金利推定モデルに関する研究会」報告書

1 12 ( )150 ( ( ) ) x M x 0 1 M 2 5x 2 + 4x + 3 x 2 1 M x M 2 1 M x (x + 1) 2 (1) x 2 + x + 1 M (2) 1 3 M (3) x 4 +

バリュー・アット・リスクのリスク指標としての妥当性について ― 理論的サーベイによる期待ショートフォールとの比較分析―

スライド 1

(2005a) (2005) ( ) (2004) (2003) 3 (2003) (2003) 2

上場変更と株価:株主分散と流動性変化のインパクト

1

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

76 3 B m n AB P m n AP : PB = m : n A P B P AB m : n m < n n AB Q Q m A B AQ : QB = m : n (m n) m > n m n Q AB m : n A B Q P AB Q AB 3. 3 A(1) B(3) C(

166“ƒŒÚ”Ł

Transcription:

Abstract JP Morgan CreditMetrics (1) () (3) (4) 1 3 3 4 4 5 10 6 16 1

1 BIS 1 3 1 BIS 1 BIS 1 3 ALM (1) Value at Risk () (3) RAROC (Risk Ajusted Return On Capital) (4)

3 5 6 31 99% (= p ) ~x X Prf~x Xg = p p p 99% 1% 3 4 1 [4] 3 3

100 A 100 A 100 1 100 100 1 100 0 80 075 4 1 0 1 1 [18] 4 () 4 (1) () (3) (4) RiskMetrics [5] 41 ( ) 4

3 [4] () i i ~r i;y ~r i;y = (1 + R i;y ) (1 0 d ~ i;y ) 0 1 (1) R i;y = i y ~d i;y = i y r i;y d i;y [1, 10, 19] () E[r i ] () ri ri ;r j ( ) () portfolio portfolio = x 0 6x 6 = r i x = 4 5

1: Aaa Aa A Baa Ba B 70 00 00 00 03 84 16 71 00 00 00 00 15 00 7 00 00 00 00 05 118 73 00 00 00 05 05 34 74 00 00 00 00 00 69 75 00 00 00 00 16 30 76 00 00 00 00 11 00 77 00 00 00 03 06 88 78 00 00 00 00 11 53 79 00 00 00 00 05 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 44 81 00 00 00 00 00 41 8 00 00 0 03 6 83 00 00 00 00 10 60 84 00 00 00 06 05 73 85 00 00 00 00 0 87 86 00 00 00 11 19 116 87 00 00 00 00 6 53 88 00 00 00 00 15 57 89 00 03 00 05 7 86 90 00 00 00 00 33 19 91 00 00 00 0 51 131 9 00 00 00 00 0 61 [9] 3 3 (1) 3 4 t n n + 1 X n n + 1 h n = Prfn X n + 1g () X 6

h(t) = h(t; z) = h 0 (t) expf 0 zg (3) z = ( ) = h 0 (t) = 1 3 GDP GDP h 0 4 i L ~ i 3 4 [4, 7] L ~ P ~ i L i P ~ i L i 4 L ~ i i 7

1 i D 0 p i1 p i p id t 0 1 t p i1 p i p id T 0 1 T 1 P 1: 43 1 ( ) t i q i;t q i;t+1 = DX j=1 p j;i q j;t (4) q t = P = p i;d = 0 B @ 0 B @ q 1;t q ;t q D;t q t+1 = Pq t (5) 1 C A p 1;1 p ;1 111 p D;1 p 1; p ; 111 p D; p 1;D p ;D 111 p D;D ( 0 (i 6= D) 1 (i = D) 1 C A i + k i i + j (k > j > 0) i p i+j;i > p i+k;i (k > j > 0) (6) [6, 19] (6) i L ~ i L P ~ i L i 8

4 5 P P L ~ i CreditMetrics 44 V dv = V dt + V dz (7) 5 z [3, ] 1 (7) i L ~ i L P ~ i L i 4 (7) (7) 9

dz L ~ i i (7) 5 ( ) () : 51 511 ( ) () t i v it v i;t+1 = v it + a i + b 1i ~x 1 + b i ~x + 111+ i (8) ~x j = j a i = i b ji = j i i = 10

1 : ( : %) ( 1) ( ) 3 ( 3) i i t 0 1nt 1 3 4 5 D 1 863 17 00 0 00 08 19 864 10 04 03 09 3 00 4 849 90 10 08 4 00 00 43 869 77 10 5 00 00 06 05 780 09 D 00 00 00 00 00 1000 3: x x N(0; 6) (9) 6 x i i v i N( i ; i ) (10) i = v it + a i (11) i = b0 6b + Var( i ) (1) x i 51 v i;t+1 i i, i v 3 i = v i 0 i i (13) v 3 i 3 4% 3 849% 4 90% 5 10% 08% x v 3 i c c+1 x c;c+1 x Z xc01;c 1 p c = p e 0 1 z dz (14) x c;c+1 p c c 11

(1 + r)p 1 rp rp 3 t 3 5 850% D 08% 10% 4 90% 4% 03 0 01 0 1 3 x 45 = 0:09 x 5D = 0:41 x 34 = 01:4 x 3 = 1:73 v 3 i rp 1 P t 3 5: 4: v 3 i 5 PV def ( 5 ) PV def = d01 X t=1 D t rp + D d P (15) d = D t = t ( ) r = P = = PV nodef PV nodef = TX t=1 D t rp + D T P (16) T 1

0 0 40 60 80 100 (%) 6: 7: L L = PV nodef 0 PV def (17) 53 10,000 ( ) 6 ( 99%) 7 x y 4 x y 4 8 p L L = (a + bq(p)) 4 + (18) a, b q(p) p p = Z q(p) 01 1 p e 0 1 z dz (19) 13

^05-4 - 0 4 0 0 40 60 80 100 (%) 8: 4 9: 54 RAROC ( ) ( ) ( ) 14

^05-4 - 0 4 10: 4 10% 9 4 ( 10) 55 CreditMetrics JP Morgan 1997 4 CreditMetrics [6] CreditMetrics 1 1 CreditMetrics CreditMetrics 1 1 1 [0, 5] 15

6 [1] Altman ES Why business fail The Journal of Business Strategy, pp 15{1, 1983 [] Robert CMerton On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates Journal of Political Economy, pp 449{470, 1973 [3] Fischer Black and Myron Scholes The pricing of options and corporate liablities Journal of Political Economy, pp 637{654, 1973 [4] TR Fleming and DP Harrington Counting process and survival analysis John Wiley and Sons, 1991 [5] JP Morgan Risk Metrics Technical Document JP Morgan, 199 [6] JP Morgan Credit Metrics Technical Document JP Morgan, 1997 [7] JD Kalbeish and RL Prentice The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data John Wiley and Sons, 1980 [8] M Kijima and K Komoribayashi A markov chain model for valuing credit risk derivatives preprint, 1997 [9] Moody's Investors Service,, 1, 1994 [10] Platt HD and Platt MB Business cycle eects on state corporate failure rates Journal of Economics and Business, pp 113{ 17, 1994 [11] Robert AJarrow, David Lando, and Stuart MTurnbull A markov model for the term structure of credit risk spreads Review of Financial Studies, pp 481{53, 1997 [1], pp 7{100, 1994 16

[13], (), 1997 [14],, 7 1996 [15] I, 1994 [16] II, 1994 [17], pp 40{57, 7 1996 [18], pp 5{54, 1997 [19],, 6 1996 [0], JCR, pp 5{9, 1996 [1] ALM, 1995 [],, 1997 [3] 4, 6 1996 [4],, pp 10{, 11 1995 [5], 1997 [6], 1997 17