43 SS Indices Related with Sustainable Transport and Comparison of the Actual Conditions
Direction of Indices for Actual Status of Sustainable Transport Triple bottom line: Economic, Social, Environmental not Mobility but Accessibility Ecological Footprints Indices 2
Case in Japan: Indices set by City of Saitama 3
National Indicators Audit Commission (UK) National Indicator # National Indicator 4
(Reading Borough) Case: NIS selected by Local Govt in UK (Reading Borough) Congestion Accessibility Safety Local Indicators Number of park & ride passenger journeys per year ( Level of public off-street spaces in the City Centre Mode split of journey to work(ac) car/bus/rail/ cycle/walk % of pedestrian crossing with facilities for disabled people (BVPI165) Bus passenger journeys to the City Centre % of users satisfied with local provision of public transport information (BVPI13) Number of walking trips to the city centre in a 12 hour period Patronage on public and flexible transport services which serve the Royal Berkshire Hospital 12 Percentage of households within 1 and 2 minutes of a local centre by public transport, cycle & walk 1725 Number of 17-25 years olds killed or seriously injured in the authority 5
Effectiveness in the Sustainable Travel Towns, UK City (Darlington) (Peterborough) (Worchester) (2429)15 Schemes 3 Effects 857 32 8 322 14 3 26 3 13 6
International Urban Data applying data Mobility in Cities,26 52 Mobility in cities Database UITP() Western Europe39 Eastern Europe6 North America1 Latin America1 Africa1 Middle East1 Asia2 Oceania1 122 UITPHPhttp://www.uitp.com/publications/MCD2-order/ 7
Urban data in Japan applying data 17 8 8 19 28.3
applying data 3 Selecting Foreign Cities for the Case Study 2 152 115 51 25 5 6 1 9 7 36 Mobility in cities 26 9
Cities for the Study applying data 3 Selecting Japanese Cities for the Case Study 152 115 51 25 1 2 6 (9) 18 18 1
Analysis
Econ. Social Evaluation Indices Evaluation Indices km/h / / Effect Env. % () MJ/ CO 2 12
13 Fig. Average speed on the road network km/h 1 2 3 4 5 5 51 115 152 2 EconomicAverage Travel Speed
EconomicAverage Travel Speed 6 5 4 3 2 1 5 1 15 2 Fig. Relation between Population density and Avg. speed on the road network 6 5 4 3 2 1 5, 1, 15, 2, Fig. Relation between Length of road per 1inhabitants and Avg. speed on the road network 14
15 Fig. Avg. public transport place occupancy rate (passenger km / place km)..1.2.3.4 5 51 115 152 2 SocialAverage Public Transport Efficiency /
SocialAverage Public Transport Efficiency.4.4.3.3.2.2.1. 5 1 15 2.1. 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, Fig. Relation between the population density and Avg. public transport place occupancy rate 16 Fig. Relation between Total public transport place km/inhabitant and Avg. public transport place occupancy rate
17 Fig. Annual public transport journeys per inhabitant 2 4 6 8 1, 5 51 115 152 2 SocialUsage of Public transport
SocialUsage of Public transport 1,2 1, 8 6 1,2 1, 8 6 4 2. 5. 1. 15. 2. Fig. Relation between Annual public transport ] journeys per inhabitant and Population density 4 2 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, Fig. Relation between Total public transport place km / inhabitant 18 and Annual public transport journeys / inhabitant
19 Fig. Passenger transport fatalities per million inhabitants 2 4 6 8 1 12 5 51 115 152 2 SocialTransport Fatalities
SocialTransport Fatalities 12 12 1 1 8 8 6 6 4 4 2 2 5 1 15 2 Fig. Relation between Population density and Passenger transport fatalities / mil. inhabitants 2 4 6 8 Fig. Relation between % of daily trips by private motorised 2 modes and Passenger transport fatalities / mil. inhabitants
21 Fig. % of daily trips by public transport 2 4 6 8 1 5 51 115 152 2 Environmental Modal Share: Public Transport
Environmental Modal Share: Public Transport 6 6 5 5 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 5 1 15 2 Fig. Population density and % of daily trips by public transport 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, Fig. Total public transport place km / inhabitant 22 and % of daily trips by public transport
23 Fig. % of daily trips by private motorised modes 2 4 6 8 1 5 51 115 152 2 Environmental Modal Share: Private motorised modes
24 Fig. % of daily trips on foot and by bicycle 2 4 6 8 1 5 51 115 152 2 Environmental Modal Share: Foot & Bicycle
25 Fig. Annual energy consumption for passenger transport per inhabitant (at vehicle) 5, 1, 15, 2, 25, 5 51 115 152 2 Environmental Energy consumption
Environmental Energy consumption 25, 2, 25, 2, 15, 15, 1, 1, 5, 5, 5 1 15 2 Fig. Population density and Annual energy consumption for passenger transport per inhabitant (at vehicle) 5 1 15 2 Fig. Avg. distance of a private motorised trip and Annual energy consumption 26 for passenger transport per inhabitant (at vehicle)
27 15..2.4.6.8 1. (5km/h1) (36.7%1) (96/1) (211) (52%1) (6,14MJ1) Comparison of Cities: population over 1.5mil.
28 115..2.4.6.8 1. (5km/h1) (36.7%1) (96/1) (211) (52%1) (6,14MJ1) Comparison of Cities: population of 1-1.5mil.
29 51..2.4.6.8 (5km/h1) (36.7%1) (96/1) (211) (52%1) (6,14MJ1) Comparison of Cities: population of.5-1mil.
3 5..2.4.6.8 1. (96/1) (52%1) (6,14MJ1) (5km/h1) (36.7%1) (211) Comparison of Cities: population less than.5mil.
Future Tasks: Direction of Analysis Development Comparing applied indices: common/unique Comparison of indices for accessibility: processing and analyzing Japan: plenty of data how about in other countries? Effect of accessibility On Triple bottom line On, i.e., health, medical service, welfare, etc. Ecological Footprint 31