6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21

Similar documents

A Message From President 2

商学 59‐5・6/1.岡部

企業価値重視、効率化経営の時代到来へ


Ver. 1.0 (discretion) (revenue management) (fictitious revenue recognition) (window dressing) (fraudulent accounting practice) SEC (General

Y-...W

橡CATV_1.PDF

ID JJF00296 Earnings management and market timing: The case of Japanese management buyouts Yasutomo Tsukioka 2-16 Japan Journal of Finance Vol.

FINANCIAL FACT BOOK 2002 CONTENTS CONTENTS Sales Data Net Sales Sales Composition Sales by Region Profit Data Cost Composition & Operating Income/Net

A5 PDF.pwd

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

Page

中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 2012 年 3 月 審査論文 1 Keywords: JEL Classi cation: L13, L22, L33 1 * *1 Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (2009) Mukherjee and Suestrong

Mizuho Industry Focus Vol

74% , China Labor Watch ,

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

中国の家計所得と消費構造に関する分析

GDPギャップと潜在成長率

290 新潟大学経済論集第 92 号 2011-Ⅱ AC 3 A 3 B C

銀行の不良債権問題と資本市場の経営監視機能 鹿野嘉昭



論文08.indd

表紙_目次.PDF

和RIMNo.22高安氏.indd

⑤香取 徹.indd

A Message From President 2 Kanamoto examiner vo.18

中国引き締め策の対外的影響

公的機関が関与した企業再生支援

キャッシュ・フロー経営とキャッシュ・フロー計算書

untitled

3論説_高橋.indd

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

GJG160842_O.QXD

1990 年度 1991 年度 平成 2 年度 平成 3 年度 March 31, 1991 March 31, 1992 米国会計基準 (U.S.GAAP)excludesrestatements 1992 年度 1993 年度 1994 年度 1995 年度 1996 年度 1997 年度 19

[1987][2000] Awareness

蜷咲ァー譛ェ險ュ螳・3

国際流動性に関する財政的側面について

H1,H4.QXP

季刊 企業と法創造 第1巻第4号(通巻第4号)

ワークショップ「国際財務報告基準(IFRS)と企業行動:IFRSアドプションのインパクト」の模様

PDFŠpŒ{Ł¶

untitled

商学57‐1◆/6.松本

headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s

橡バミューダ保険市場(岡崎).PDF

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―


物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―

金融システムレポート(2008年3月号)

1

(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1

PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

7 9 IRGC: Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps N

Psacharopulos Psacharopulos and Patrinos (1) Byron and Takahashi McMahon and Boediono Duflo (2)

業績報告|ディスクロージャー│チューリッヒ|Business Report 2008 会社概要編

Title Author(s) フェア ディスクロージャー ルールとアナリスト行動 石川, 徹 Citation 大阪大学経済学. 67(2-3-4) P.40-P.50 Issue Date Text Version publisher URL

Association of South East Asian Nations: ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN ASEAN

repocost.PDF

OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程

2 / 24

,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (

untitled

証券市場の機能と証券業務

untitled

金融コングロマリットと範囲の経済:収益面の分析( )

A System of National Accounts (SNA) 2

p6-18/村松様

(1) 259 (2) 259 (3) (1) 260 (2) 261 (3) (1) 262 (2) 266 (3) 267 (4) (1) 268 (2) 269 (3) 269 (4) 270 (5) 270 (6) 27

Ł\”ƒ1PDFŠp

,255 7, ,355 4,452 3,420 3,736 8,206 4, , ,992 6, ,646 4,

Financial Reporting Standard 17 FRS17 FAS87 87 Financial Accounting Standard 87 FAS87 International Accounting Standard Board IASB 19 Internat


1 Annual Report 212

IDEC Report 2015 IDEC Report 2015

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

76 1 2

untitled

2016 (8) Variety Expansion Effects by Feenstra (1994) 1 Variety Effects Dixit and Stiglitz (1977) CES n n? n t U t = ( nt i=1 σ > 1, a it > 0,

IP Management Within Universities: Experiences in the US


★HP09_08

A5 PDF.pwd

商学 65‐5☆/14.植田

082_rev2_utf8.pdf

2006

Channel to Discovery Plan &

Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit

村本 孜71‐89/71‐89

28_04_斎藤正章.indd

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)

公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ

非営利組織における純資産と負債の区分

SUSENAS Kor Modul (2) (3) (4)

第1章Word版.PDF

A5 PDF.pwd

OSIPPニュースレター.indd

Transcription:

1) 1997 15 02 03 751 1998 8 9 04 1996 16.1% 17.5% 26.9% 64.9% 63.3% 48.9% 2) 02 54.8% 59.0% 61.8% 78.6% 46.5% 1996 17.8% 19.9% 18.7% 42% 11.9% 3) 4) 01 3 1 3 2 03 04 1 TCL 5) Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06

6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency 2 3 1 1 8) 21

1 1 00 5 03: 226 228 2 9) 1 02 1 4 1% 1994 44. 43.93 287 1995 43.23 42.39 311 1996 43.66 42.51 514 1997 44.55 43.72 7 1998 45.35 44.61 825 1999 45.33 44.61 923 00 44.70 44.28 1,060 01 44.02 43.41 1,136 02 43.42 43.03 1,0 03 42.52 41.26 1,263 B 22 Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06

3 SIP share issue privatization 01 10) Xu and Wang 1997 1993 1995 00 1995 92 1996 1999 4 01 1996 1999 00 3 05 1997 151 1998 02 Brada, 1996 11) SIP 2 Wei et al. 03 1990 1997 3 8 23

SIP net profit 1 12) 50% return on sales: ROS 1 Sun and Tong 03 1994 1998 634 SIP SIP real net profit: RNP real earnings before interest and tax: real EBIT real sales: RS 1 RS EBIT ROS EBIT EBIT/sales Wei et al. 03 13) 2 SIP 50% RNP EBIT RS EBIT SIP 4 SIP SIP 50% 14) 24 Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06

1994 1994 1994 1998 737 B 737 651 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 9 18 153 179 92 1994 15) 1993 Sun and Tong 03 1992 11 1994 1994 1993 651 1995 00 112 45 67 1 2 3 109 SinoFin-CCER 10 1998 3 1998 16) 2 A 1998 03 174 1998 651 107 3 651 25

2 1995 02 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 00 01 02 03 1 3 9 17 17 23 17 34 53 174 311 514 7 825 923 1,060 1,136 1,0 1,263 A 3 651 1995 03 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 00 01 02 03 0 2 6 11 10 16 9 19 34 107 227 380 559 651 651 651 651 651 651 651 4 1995 03 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 00 01 02 03 A 0 4 16 26 35 29 29 33 26 198 651 0 4 13 21 26 23 18 19 144 A 04 4 2 3 5 ROS ROE ROA DAR MC/SALE 17) ROS ROE ROA MC/SALE 2 1994 03 651 ROS ROE ROA 26 Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06

5 ROS: Return on Sales ROE: Return on Equity ROA: Return on Assets DAR: Debt-Asset Ratio MC/SALE% 1) 100 100 2) 100 100 100 1 2 00: 150 1990 651 01 4 13 10 2 651 1994 03 651 27

651 1995 00 44 3 6 ΔROS ΔROE ΔROA 6 5 5 ΔROS ΔROA ΔROE ΔMC/SALEΔMC/SALE 2 2 ΔMC/SALE ΔROS 1 ΔMC/SALE 0.7 ΔROS 5.8 1 1 3 6 6 13 7 12 23 33 39 44 44 44 42 38 13 4 7 1 651 1995 00 44 28 Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06

4 6 6 13 6 15 26 38 52 65 65 65 61 57 43 25 10 7 1 651 1995 00 65 ΔMC/SALE 3.7 ΔROS 8.7 ΔMC/SALE ΔROS ΔMC/SALE DAR DAR DAR 2 4 65 ΔROE ΔROS ΔROA ΔROE ΔMC/SALE 6 DAR 2 29

ΔROS ΔROE 3 3 4 6 2 6 Δ y ROE Δ y ROS Δ y ROA Δ y ROS 6 ΔROE ΔROS ΔROA 6 ROE ROA ROS ROA ΔROS ΔROA Δ y ROS Δ y ROA ΔROS ΔROA 30 Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06

0.52 0.386 6 1) 3, 1 1, 3 Z 0.12 0.664 2) ΔROS ΔROE ΔROA ΔyROS Δ y ROE Δ y ROA Δ y ROS Δ y ROE Δ y ROA Z 3, 1 4, 6 1.67 5.74 7.42 44 3.91 1.50 2.41 2.509** 1.45 7.74 1.87 4.85 1.149 65 0.88 1.83 2.71 2.56 1.08 3.64 1.408 43 0.88 3.72 4.60 1.02 2.47 1.44 1.7 0.13 4.11 4.24 44 6.12 9.59 3.46 2.976*** 1.06 6.09 3.88 4.16 0.642 65 0.40 3.65 3.26 3.11 1.87 4.98 2.068** 43 0.40 3.64 2.07 0.87 9.18 6.71 1.1 0.369 7.15 8.04 2.016* 0.487 3.24 2.95 2.608** 1.13 0.60 1.73 44 2.67 0.60 2.07 2.474** 1.92 0.12 2.04 2.32 0.16 2.16 1.232 0.469 0.650 65 0.25 0.88 1.13 1.14 0.66 1.80 1.611 43 0.29 0.74 1.03 0.83 1.35 5.76 6.73 12.5 44 5.10 3.74 1.36 2.416** 4.78 5.88 10.66 3.06 0.17 2.89 1.605 0.840 0.103 65 4.19 2.01 6. 3.51 0.89 4.40 1.735* 43 4.67 5.84 10.52 1.70 3.58 1.88 1.690* 0.58 4.98 4.40 44 6.23 9.36 3.12 3.303*** 0.35 6.30 6.64 3.81 2.56 6.37 2.3** 0.753 0.487 65 1.25 4.38 3.13 3.51 1.87 5.38 2.356** 43 1.25 5.03 3.78 1.87 0.05 1.82 2.910*** 1.59 0.00 1.59 44 3.02 0.64 2.38 2.591** 2.39 0.71 3.10 2.61 0.68 1.93 1.1 0.284 0.413 65 0.38 1.14 1.52 1.45 0.62 2.07 1.970* 43 0.05 0.25 0. 1.02 1.13 5.18 2.93 2.25 44 5.09 4.73 4.73 0.560 5.85 2.87 2.98 4.70 6.68 1.98 0.448 0.766 1.048 65 5.92 3.74 2.18 4.92 2.76 2.16 3.408*** 43 5.92 2.17 3.75 4.17 2.87 1.30 2.560** 1.57 0.10 1.67 44 1.22 0.73 0.49 0.945 0.33 0.40 0.07 0.523 0.88 2.25 1.37 0.611 65 0.78 0.39 0.39 1.51 0.99 0.52 0.029 43 0.52 1.12 1.64 0.83 1.61 0.78 0.724 1.33 0.41 0.92 44 1.24 0.44 0.80 2.661** 1.19 0.50 0.69 1.11 0.51 0.60 2.128** 0.154 0.960 65 1.45 0.58 0.88 1.22 0.48 0.74 3.447*** 43 1.29 0.05 1.24 1.02 0. 1.22 3.502*** 0.635 1 3 3 3 Wilcoxon Wilcoxon *** ** * 1% 5% 10% 651 2 109 Δ y ROS Δ y ROA ΔROS ΔROA ΔROS 31

ΔROA ΔROS ΔROA ROE ΔROE Δ y ROE ROA ROE 7 7 ΔDAR ΔMC/SALE 32 Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06

7 ΔMC/SALE ΔDAR 44 65 44 65 44 65 44 65 44 65 44 65 44 65 3, 1 43,896.48 53,984.95 45,811.79 81,186.78 19,347.04 26,022.57 18,182.57 38,050.71 21,681.99 27,7.73 26,868.89 42,314.86 1.92 2.06 1.76 1.98 516.97 698.43 516.85 1,360.32 0.16 1.67 1.06 2.59 4.22 3.36 0.69 2.01 1, 3 95,3.89 101,524.16 85,084.71 133,6.26 51,577.11 55,253.59 36,123.37 62,701.09 31,0.22 42,075.22 44,183.29 65,974.71 2.47 2.99 1.88 2.19 1,351.95 1,525.63 859. 1,346.31 4.94 2.98 1.75 0.51 7.42 7.88 2.77 1.63 Z 3, 1 51,307.41 47,539. 4.680*** 38,092.83 48,165.90 0.723 39,272.93 52,019.49 4.924*** 43 44,654.51 85,222.86 32,230.07 29,231.02 4.913*** 17,647.12 21,4.27 1.859* 17,940.79 24,650.38 4.107*** 43 16,900.62 40,642.17 9,518.23 14,867.49 3.104*** 18,931.64 26,4.08 1.754* 17,314.40 23,659.85 5.558*** 43 23,748.99 44,174.09 0.56 0.93 0.12 0.21 834.99 827.19 342.35 14.01 5.10 1.31 4.446*** 2.878*** 2.036** 43 4.131*** 2.501** 1.480 43 1.809* 1.223 1.83 1.89 1.76 1.94 417.26 582.54 443.87 1,662.01 0.14 0.67 0.69 2.08 1.526 43 1.89 0.79 3.19 4.52 2.08 0.37 2.287** 1.698* 0.003 43 2.83 1.41 0.69 2.80 4, 6 147,414.34 1,357.33 124,752.72 181,826.55 90,124.63 118,047.52 58,700.78 84,958.55 47,514.84 68,809.43 61,342.40 90,327.53 2.74 3.40 1.98 2.19 1,552.96 2,633.19 1,271.84 1,736.83 9.81 6.05 5.47 1.17 9.13 10.40 1.57 1.76 Z 109,321.51 153,191.43 3.808*** 2.023** 80,098.21 96,603.68 4.878*** 72,477.51 96,843.25 3.808*** 2.628*** 41,800.16 44,316.38 3.900*** 28,583. 42,389.35 3.397*** 0.177 37,593.42 46,153.44 4.999*** 0.92 1.51 0.23 0.25 3.547*** 2.801*** 3.234*** 1,135.70 2,050.65 3.173*** 2.318** 827.97 74.81 1.521 9.67 6.72 1.829* 1.004 3.58 0.38 6.31 8.99 0.89 1.04 1.980* 2.315** 0.097 2.215** 3 3 3 Wilcoxon Wilcoxon *** ** * 1% 5% 10% 109 33

8 Z 48,236.95 59,081.06 49,168.22 84,722.35 0.963 DAR 48.01 48.33 41.72 42.47 1.840* ROS 7.49 8.13 8.92 9.85 0.741 ROE 8.96 2.66 10.59 5.47 2.050** ROA 4.74 3.38 5.70 5.05 1.612 Wilcoxon ** * 5% 10% 109 3 ROS ROE ROA 2 8 ROS ROA ROE ROE 34 Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06

1 Δ y ROE ΔROE 2 Δ y ROS Δ y ROA ROS ROA 1 3 ROS ROA ROE ROE 4 5 2 35

ROE 1) 2 2) 1998 76 81 84 89 3) 1998 76 81 03 58 66 4) 01 5) TCL 1990 04 6) CEO MBO 04 7) 3 04 8) 1994 11 03: 485 489 9) 10 central securities clearing system HKSCC Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company Limited 10) de facto privatization 0303 11) Zinnes, Eilat, and Sachs 01 deep privatization Megginson and Netter 01 12) state ownership 50% 50% 36 Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06

2 13) government ownership 11 14) 15) 01 1993 3 16) 02 17) 04 Brada, Josef C. (1996), Privatization is transition-or is it?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10 (2), pp. 67 86. David J. Sheskin (00), Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures, Boca Raton, CRC Press. Megginson, William L. and Jeffry M. Netter (01), From state to market: a survey of empirical studies on privatization, Journal of Economic Literature, 39 (2), pp. 321 389. Sun, Qian and Wilson H.S. Tong (03), China share issue privatization: the extent of its success, Journal of Financial Economics, 70, pp. 183 222. Wei, Zuobao, Oscar Varela, Juliet D Souza, and M. Kabir Hassan (03), The financial and operating performance of China s newly privatized firms, Financial Management, 32 (2), pp. 107 126. Xu, X. and Wang Y. (1997), Ownership structure, corporate governance, and corporate performance, Policy Research Working Paper, 1794, pp. 1 56. Zinnes, Clifford, Yair Eilat, and Jeffrey Sachs (01), The gains from privatization in transition economies: is change of ownership enough?, IMF Staff Papers, 48, pp. 146 170. 02 137 154 03 S. 1984 1956 05 5 1 21 04 53 3 102 132 03 49 2 45 63 04 9 79 90 00 01 55 9 1 00 8 28 35 01 11 3 11 1998 1998 1996 1996 04 37

8 16 http://finance.sina.com.cn/t/040816/12951523.shtml 04 9 8 http://business.sohu.com/040908/n221934755.shtml 03 7 16 1 04http://business.sohu.com/s04/guoqigaige.shtml 00 105 127 01 19 26 30 03 03 0303 049 11 http://business.sohu.com/ 040911/n221992495.shtml E-mail: xutaoj@ybb.ne.jp 38 Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06