学術会議講演 pptx

Similar documents
<4D F736F F D20819A C A838A815B E58A C F955D89BF95FB964089FC92F982F08B8182DF82E990BA96BE95B

The Value Of Interships - Adecco Asia White Paper 2015_no1

Microsoft PowerPoint - 公開 _学術会議資料.pptx


橡Taro13-FDアンケート (教員)

untitled

_’¼Œì

APUにおける国際化と課題

学位研究17号

Microsoft PowerPoint _CiteScore.pptx

10-渡部芳栄.indd


HP

PREFACE This report contains data on degrees awarded at Jackson State University by academic discipline, educational level and gender for the years. A

評論・社会科学 90号(よこ)(P)/4.咸

49148

2 94

.... APU.

24 25




教育を疑う!:ランチョンセミナー( ).ppt

Microsoft PowerPoint - SaidTaha_Japan Presentation _EN_JP_after.pptx

:. SPSS

w.....I.v48.\1-4.eps

『広島平和科学』24 (2002) pp

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004


Juntendo Medical Journal



05_藤田先生_責

<30315F985F95B65F90B490852E696E6464>

07-加納孝代.indd

2 / 24


06’ÓŠ¹/ŒØŒì

Phonetic Perception and Phonemic Percepition

ERINA Report

1) , 215, 1441, , 132, 1237, % College Analysis 2-4) 2

01年譜ほか.indd

Elmore & Pohlmann Greenwood & Ramagli a b c a b c

I

00.\...ec5


国際交流プログラム報告書

<95DB8C9288E397C389C88A E696E6462>

大学論集第42号本文.indb


Kyoto University * Filipino Students in Japan and International Relations in the 1930s: An Aspect of Soft Power Policies in Imperial Japan

DAY )


untitled

udc-2.dvi

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて

PDFóp

M-JUSD2471b

Financial Reporting Standard 17 FRS17 FAS87 87 Financial Accounting Standard 87 FAS87 International Accounting Standard Board IASB 19 Internat

201/扉

pwd



宮本/宮本

ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率-サーベイ・データによる再検証-


評論・社会科学 89号(よこ)(P)/3.森

02[ ]小山・池田(責)岩.indd

Sport and the Media: The Close Relationship between Sport and Broadcasting SUDO, Haruo1) Abstract This report tries to demonstrate the relationship be

Rubin Rubin

GNH Gross National Happiness Criteria living standard cultural diversity emotional well being health education time use eco-system community vitality

ISO GC 24

untitled

RIETI Highlight VOL.25

名称未設定-1


p6-18/村松様

13

ISSN ISBN C3033 The Institute for Economic Studies Seijo University , Seijo, Setagaya Tokyo , Japan

公務員人件費のシミュレーション分析

de facto GDP 10 2 IMF remittance ODA FDI % ,701 2, ,620 2,


IBPC Osaka Event Topics International Affairs Department, Investment Promotion Project

untitled

CA HP,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,,,,,.,,

橡 PDF


地理空間_3-1.indb

Kansai University of Welfare Sciences Practical research on the effectiveness of the validation for the elderly with dementia Naoko Tsumura, Tomoko Mi

第1章 調査の概要

09[ ]鶴岡(責).indd

2 The Bulletin of Meiji University of Integrative Medicine 3, Yamashita 10 11

やまびこ60.indd


untitled

和RIMNo.22高安氏.indd


Ł×

得点 120 図 1 指標別に見た大学の評価 (2007 年 ) UC Berkeley (100) Cambridge (100) Cal Tech (100) Cal Tech (100) Hong Kong (100) London S. E. (100) Harvard (100) Toky

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

Transcription:

2

(HEFCELeague tables and their impacts on higher educations in England) 3

4

5 5

!"#" #" #$ % QS 2009 and 2010 World University Ranking 6 Indicators Weight 13 Used Indicators Weight TIME 2010 World University Ranking 13 Proposed Indicators (later possibly 16 indicators) % Weight Research 60% 30% Research 1. Academic Peer Review (composite score drawn 40% 1. Reputational survey-research 19.5% Indicators from peer-review survey) 2. Research income (scaled) 5.25% Research influence 2. Research Excellence (the total number of citations for all papers published from the institution, and then dividing the figure by the number of full-time equivalent staff) (Data: Scopus by Elsevier 2005-2009) 3. Papers per academic and research staff 4.5% 4. Public research income/total research income 20% 5. The number of times its published work is cited by academia: Normalized citation impact** (Data: Web of Science by Thomson Reuters 2004-2008) 0.75% 32.5% 1. Academic papers (scaled-the number of papers produced per member of research staff. (it is a low weighted measure.)) 2. Citation impact (normalized by subject-the number of citations for each paper produced at an institution) 3. Research income (scaled against research staff numbers) 4. Research income from public sources/industry 5. Reputation survey (research excellence) 55% Teaching 3. Teaching Excellence (a simple measure of staff-to-student ratio) 20% 30% Institutional Indicators 11. Reputational survey-teaching 15% 12. PhD awards per academic staff 6% 6. Undergraduate entrants (scaled against academic staff numbers) 7. PhDs/undergraduate degrees awarded (the proportion of PhDs awarded against undergraduate degrees awarded) 25% 13. Undergraduates admitted per academic staff (staff-to-student ratio) 4.5% 8. PhDs awarded (scaled) 9. Reputation survey (teaching excellence) 14. Institutional income per academic staff 2.25% 10. Institutional (overall) income (scaled against staff numbers) 15. PhD awards/bachelor s awards 2.25% International mix 4. International Faculty (measured as a proportion of student body) 5. International Students (measured as a proportion of student body) 10% 5% International Diversity 5% 11. Ratio of international to domestic staff 3% 5% 12. Ratio of international to domestic students 2% 11. Ratio of international to domestic students 12. Ratio of international to domestic staff *1. [Future potential indicator]: a measure of research papers co-authored with international partners] 10% Industry relations 6. Employer Survey (scored on responses to employer survey) 10% 13. Research income from industry (per academic staff) &&'()%*+,-,+./0%,.%)-*(%1-1)2%-2)%*.31-2)4%5+,(%,()%-6)2-7)%/839)2%.:%*+,-,+./0%2)*)+6)4%9;%-<<%1-1)20%189<+0()4%+/%,()%0-3)%:+<)4%-/4%;)-2=% % 2.5% Economic Activity /Innovation 13. Research income from industry (scaled again research staff numbers) *2. [Future potential indicator: the volume of papers co-authored with industrial partners] *3. [Future potential indicator: a subjective examination of employers perception of graduates] 10%

!! Process to Curiculate Citation Impact Score 3(D@E#-*()!;.-(-.$5!<,0(#-! #.-(-.$5+!0&%!0(0&%!F;==G!?! ABC 6$7.8.&7!9$%,().:&7!;.-(-.$5!<,0(#- ;==!-$!->&!4)$1()!(/&%(4&!$8!;==!?!@! ABC 3&4.$5()!6$7.8.#(-.$5! #.-(-.$5!%(-&+ "#$%&!'()*&+ #*,*)(-./&!0%$1(1.).-2!+#$%&! 7

8

Citation Impact 2010 TIMES HE University Rankings TR Essential Science Indicators 2010 QS Asian University Rankings 2010 QS World University Rankings Web of Science 2004-2008(5) Web of Science 2000-2010 (11) Scopus 2003-2007 (5) Scopus Last 5 years (2005-2009 ) Citation/paper Citation/paper Citation/paper Citation/faculty 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

Korea, South Japan Japan Japan Japan Japan Taiwan Japan Japan Hong Kong Hong Kong China Hong Kong Korea, South Taiwan Singapore Korea, South Japan Japan Taiwan Hong Kong China China China Singapore Korea, South Taiwan Hong Kong Japan Japan China Japan Japan Japan Hong Kong Japan Japan China Japan 18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

2011200810 200810iPS

2011.5.1 2008.10.1 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 38

39

40

41