untitled

Similar documents
Microsoft Word - summary11_j_03quality_ doc


A Comparison of Reliability of Industrial Classifications in Japan Fumihiko Kimura, Tohoku University

74% , China Labor Watch ,

untitled

PC 2

産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

結語と展望―世界史の全体構図からみた「太平洋戦争」の歴史的意味とその教訓

Economic Development in Asian Perspective

- March UFJ IBM M PC

中期経営計画 「NEXTAGE‐05」説明会

1

No. 26 March 2016 IoT innovation IoT innovation 1 2 ICT Industry and IoT Innovation-Case Study of Competition and Cooperation between ICT and Automobi

A-FR

3論説_高橋.indd

アジ研教科書「マクロ安定化」.PDF

中国の家計所得と消費構造に関する分析

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

: 1

液晶ディスプレイ産業の地域別動向

情報化社会に関する全国調査中間報告書

JICA JETRO



ONPRESS190


920P-1


広報しもつけp01ol

本文(B5×40)0614三校責了.indd


<928696EC28967B95B6292E696E6464>


取扱説明書

GJG160842_O.QXD

Walter et al. 2009: 1 Helleiner 1994 Strange 1971: Gilpin 1987: -65 Strange b, 1998c,

untitled

160203_02_kojima_四_e.indd

80 GDP GDP Key Indicators GDP IT RIM 2007 Vol.7 No

- June 0 0

長岡慎介  45‐78/45‐78

(2) 正 しい 戦 争 ( 正 戦 論 ) jus ad bellum, jus in bello, (3) 聖 なる 戦 争 ( 十 字 軍 聖 戦 論 ) Deus vult

社会学批評 6号☆/中トビラ1

東アジアの企業統治と企業法制改革 扉.indd

A: B: C: D: E: a: b: 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: Figure 1. Land-use around the Songkhla Lakes A: Rice field B: Urban area C: Fish/Shrimp ponds D: I

J53-01

626†i”Rfic”††j

untitled

title


ピラニ真空計

‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹

商学57‐1◆/2.上田

資源紛争概念の再検討

財政のサステナビリティと長期金利の動向


Briefs Topics Regional Business May

The Mill on the Floss, 1860 Maggie Tulliver The Bell, 1958 Dora Greenfield 1. 全知のナレーターと饒舌な登場人物たち Avrom Fleishaman 1 Nancy Henry omniscient nar

untitled

外国語教育センタージャーナル第9号

1973 Salvador Allende los desaparecidos D Democracy -15

, 2008; Shih, Wang, & Wei, ,342 ha , ,677 ha , ,613 ha , , IC IC

untitled

橡sei_ho52.PDF

株式分割払込制度と企業金融、設備投資の関係について ─1930年代初において株式追加払込が果たした役割を中心に─


中国市場における日系・欧米系企業の戦略比較

46 立 教 アメリカン スタディーズ

Hall (1992) 20 Arthur 2011 Hall 1992 evo-devo 20 Arthur evo-devo evo-devo p. x Hall 1992 Arthur Arthur 2011 developmental repatte

1 Flores, D. (009) All you can drink: should we worry about quality? Journal of Regulatory Economics 35(1), Saggi, K., and Vettas, N. (00) On in

0701073‐立命‐社会システム15号/15‐6-査読論文-洪

和RIM25_三浦氏.indd

Robert B Ekelund Jr and Edward O Price III The Economics of Edwin Chadwick: Incentives Matter Cheltenham UK and Northampton MA: Edward Elgar 2012 xi 2

名称未設定-1+

3.k.indd

腎不全-第22回.indd

橡同居選択における所得の影響(DP原稿).PDF


02_岡本慎平 様.indd

_›ªficŸaŁF

評論・社会科学 116号(P)Y☆/1.郭

明石茂生  1‐94/1‐94

☆論 王維 73~129/王維

00_門奈氏.indd

表紙_目次.PDF

橡Taro13-FDアンケート (教員)

導入

金/金

†sŸ_Ł¶†t„µŠlŁª(P2†`P24)/‘ã−C”s‡É‡¨‡¯‡éfiñ‘dŸJfiŁ”s‘ê‡Ì”À‘Ø„¤‰ƒ


本文.indd

和RIM28_向山氏.indd

& Innovations & New Growth Market Good Progress on New Generation Products 2

THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY 2007, Vol. 15 No. 2, 217–227

日本企業におけるビジネス・プロセス・マネジメント : パナソニック(株)の事例を中心として

untitled

中国のイスラム教徒―歴史と現況

(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1

- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

Transcription:

11 2 3 C3 5 C5 1. 1978 Brandt et al. [8] - 1 -

3 C3 5 C5 C3 1 9 1 2 C3 C3 3 1 C3 % 9 78.2 7 38.5 9 56.8 7 47.5 9 56.3 8 67.6 9 8.9 9 27.2 9 95.3 9 24.5 9 72.5 8 18.8 9 78.4 8.6 9 87.5 8 43.3 9 61.2 7 12.3 9 37.9 1 2 [] 11-2 -

2 3 4 5 2. 2.1. 1 GfK GfK 21 3 1 7 % 8 7 5 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 C3 C5 2 21 3 7 3 GfK - 3 -

C3 C5 1 7 CRT LCD 2 7 54.% CRT 42.6% LCD CRT LCD C3 LCD 39.% 7 52.8% LCD 5 7 32.% 27.9% 3 2 7 % 9 8 7 5 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 1 1 8 2 3 21 3 GfK 1 C3 199 1993 35.3% 1999.1% Kimura [forthcoming] - 4 -

3 7 (a) CRT (b) LCD SAMSUNG,.5% SONY,.6% PHILIPS, 1.18% XOCECO, 4.96% OTHERS, 12.14% KONKA, 19.91% OTHERS, 28.% SAMSUNG,.% HISENSE, 9.12% HAIER, 6.14% SKYWORTH RGB, 8.42% TCL, 11.22% CHANGHONG, 17.59% HAIER, 4.32% SONY, 7.74% HISENSE, 11.44% SKYWORTH RGB, 15.31% XOCECO, 4.5% TCL, 6.48% PHILIPS, 6.67% KONKA, 7.24% CHANGHONG, 6.71% GfK 2.2. C3 C5 2 4 1 17.% 11.3% 2 14.2% 7 3 7 1 2 17.2% 16.1% 4 7 % 7 5 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 C3 C5 2 21 3 7 3 GfK - 5 -

5 4 5 % 6 5.4% 7.3% 2 5 7 % 7,, 6,, 5,, 4,, 3,, 2,, 1,, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 8 7 5 3 2 3 21 3 GfK 2.3. 6 C3 4 49.8% 8 67.6% C5 3 67.3% 8 81.8% Nokia 4.3% 8 39.4% 2 3 1999 [] - 6 -

6 1 8 % 9 8 7 5 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 C3 C5 3 GfK 7 7 172.% 96.1% 1999 5 7 5 8 157 3 Samsung Electronics Motorola 6 C3 C5 4-7 -

7 1 8 %,, 5,,,, 3,,,,,, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 18 1 1 1 8 GfK 2 3% 3. 3.1. 8 C3 199 2-8 -

199 C5 1985 72.4% VW 24.1% 3.5% C3 % 9 VW 9.3% VW 9.% GM 8.9% 9% 4 4 7.% 5 6.2% 9 6 5.7% 7 5.5% 9 4.4% 8 1985 9 % 9 8 7 5 3 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 C3 C5 199 199 9 9 47 3 [7] - 9 -

9 1955 9 16,, 1 14,, 1 12,,,, 8 8,, 6,, 4,, 2,, 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 19 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 197 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 198 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 [1996] 191 199 1992 9 % 9% 8% 7% % 5% % 3% % % % 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 - -

3.2. 1992 9 11 3 1 C3 C5 1 1 6.6% 2 6.2% 3 5.7% 9 1 11.8% 2 6.6% 3 6.1% 11 1992 9 % 7 5 3 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 C3 C5 199 1997 143 12 25 15 199 3 198 8% Ohara [6] - 11 -

% 12 198 9 % 3,, 25,,,, 15,,,, 5,, 18 1 1 1 8 198 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 4. 4.1. 199 13 5 1 13.8% 6 5.4% 8 6.9% C3 2-12 -

5.4% 3 4.6% C3 8 % 4 45 35 3 25 15 5 13 199 8 % 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 C3 C5 1991 1993 5 13 1.8 8 5.1 2.8 2 3333 5 6686 3 2 M&A 8 4 [8] - 13 -

14 199 8, 5,, 3,,, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 4.2. 15 1 徽 1 1.3% 8 5.9% 8 C3.6% C5 14.4% 15 1 8 % 16 14 12 8 6 4 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 C3 C5 6 7-14 -

6 7 13 199 4425 7 528 5 5777 M&A [] M&A 16 1978 7 1, 1, 1,, 8,,,, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 1978 1979 198 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 199 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 5. 5.1. 2 4 17-15 -

[7] 1 2 54 4 8 5564 18 2.6 3.1% 2.4% 143 169 17 2 4 % 18 16 14 12 8 6 4 2 2 3 4 C3 C5 [5] 18 2 4,, 35,, 3,, 25,,,, 15,,,, 5,, 2 3 4 1,8 1, 1, 1, 1, 8 [5] - 16 -

5.2. 19 1999 C3 13.5% 8 43.3% 8 1 啤 17.8% 2 啤 13.2% 3 啤.3% [8] 19 1 8 % 4,5 4, 3,5 3, 2,5 2, 1,5 1, 5 1998 1999 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 C3 C5 7 5 3 1 2 4 2 5.3. 7 1 5.2% - 17 -

2 7 % 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 2 3 4 5 6 7 C3 C5 18 16 14 12 8 6 4 2 6. 1978 CRT - 18 -

[] [7] [8] [8] [] M&A [7] 7-8 Brandt, Loren, Thomas G. Rawski, and John Sutton [8]. China s Industiral Development. In Loren Brandt, and Thomas G. Rawski (eds.). China s Great Economic Transformation. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kimura, Koichiro [forthcoming]. China and India s Electrical and Electronics Industries: A Comparison between Market Structures. In Moriki Ohara, Hong Lin, and Manimegalai Vijayabaskar (eds.). Comparative Study on Industrial Development Process in China and India. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Ohara, Moriki [8]. Interfirm Relations under Late Industrialization in China. Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies. - 19 -