\S 1. $g$ $n$ $\{0\}=$ $\subset\alpha\subset\cdots\subset r_{n-1}\subset$ $=r,$ $\dim_{c}r_{j}=j(0\leq j\leq n)$ $A_{j+1}/A_{j}(0\leq j\leq n-1)$ $\la
|
|
|
- かんじ ひめい
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 , 2000 pp Mackey Dixmier = 50 Pukanzsky, Duflo, Pedersen $\text{}$ 60 Kirillov Dixmier = Mackey 62 Kirillov Auslander-Kostant 1 Pukanzsky 1 70 $ $) $-$ = = Corwin, Pedersen - $-$ 19
2 \S 1. $g$ $n$ $\{0\}=$ $\subset\alpha\subset\cdots\subset r_{n-1}\subset$ $=r,$ $\dim_{c}r_{j}=j(0\leq j\leq n)$ $A_{j+1}/A_{j}(0\leq j\leq n-1)$ $\lambda_{j}$ 1. $\lambda_{j}(0\leq j\leq n-1)$ $ $\Phi$ $g$ $-$ 1. : $g=\langle T,P,Q\rangle_{R};[T,P$ $=-Q,$ $[T,Q]=P$ 2. Diamond algebra : $\infty=\langle T,P,Q,Z\rangle_{R}$ ; $[T,P]=-Q,$ $[T,Q]=P,$ $[P,Q]=Z$ 2. $G$ () $g$ $exp:oarrow G$ $G$ Ll. (Dixmier [13], Saito [42]) $G$ $\Phi$ $-$ (1) $\sim(6)$ (1) $G$ {2) $exp:\iotaarrow G$ (3) $exp:aarrow G$ (4) (5) $r$ $\lambda$ A $X\ovalbox{\ttREJECT}\mapsto\lambda(XX1+i\alpha)$ $(\alpha\in \mathbb{r})$ $i=\sqrt{-1}$ (6) $p$ & $-$ $G$ $H$ $G$ $\Delta_{G}$ $H$ $\Delta_{H,G}=\Delta_{H}/\Delta_{G}$ $G$ $\psi:garrow \mathbb{c}$ $\psi(gh)=\delta_{h,g}(h)\psi(g)(g\in G, h\in H)$ 20
3 \mathfrak{n}^{\ell}$ $mdh$ $G-$ $v_{g,h}$ = $v_{g.h}(\psi)=\oint_{g}l^{h}\psi(g)dv_{g,h}(g)$ $H$ $P$ $P$ $G$ $F$ $F(gh)=\Delta_{HG}^{1}p,(h)p(h)^{-1}(F(g))(g\in G, h\in H)$ $mod H$ $ P =( v_{g,h}( F ^{2}))^{1/2}=(\oint_{G H} F(g) \zeta dv_{g,h}(g))^{\psi 2}$ $G$ $V_{G,H}$ $G$ $G$ $P$ $ind_{g}^{hp}$ 1 \S 2. Kirillov [27] t) - $g$ $G=\exp \mathfrak{g}$ $G$ $G$ $\hat{g}$ $G$ $g^{*}$ = $g$ $G$ $\mathfrak{g}^{*}$ 1)- () $g\in G,$ $P\in \mathfrak{g}^{*}$ $\hat{g}$ $l\in \mathfrak{g}^{*}$ $(g\cdot l)(x)=l(g^{-1}\cdot X)(\forall X\in \mathfrak{g})$ $G$ $\Phi^{*}/G$ 4 = $B_{\ell}$ $g$ $\mathfrak{n}$ $\mathfrak{n}\subset $\mathfrak{n}$ $\Leftrightarrow \mathfrak{n}=\mathfrak{n}^{\ell}\leftrightarrow u\subset \mathfrak{n}^{\ell}$ $B_{\ell}(X,Y)=\ell([X.Y])(X,Y\in o)$ $\mathfrak{n}^{1}=\{x\in p:b_{\ell}(x,y)=0, \forall Y\in \mathfrak{n}\}$ $P$ $\mathfrak{n}$ $2\dim \mathfrak{n}=\dim A^{+\dim}A^{l}$ $\hat{g}$ $\ell$ 3. $\mathfrak{g}$ $\mathfrak{g}$ )- $0$ $\ell\in g^{*}$ $0$ polarization $\mathfrak{g}$ $S(\ell,\mathfrak{g})$ $M(\ell,\mathfrak{g})$ $l\in J^{s}$ $p$ A polarization $ff\in S(\ell,\mathfrak{g})$ $\chi_{\ell}(\exp X)=e^{r(X\rangle}(X\in 0)$ $G$ $H=\exp 0$ $G$ \ell,o, $G$ ) $=ind_{h}^{g}\chi_{\ell}$ $p(p,0,g)$ $O\in S(\ell,\mathfrak{g})$ $I(P,\mathfrak{g})$ $I(P,\mathfrak{g})$ 21 Pukanszky
4 2.1. (Pukanszky [40]) $H=\exp 0$ $\ell\in A^{s},$ $0\in S(\ell,\mathfrak{g})$ (1) $\sim(3)$ (1) $H$.\ell =\ell +01 $0^{\perp}=\{\lambda\in \mathfrak{g}^{*} : \lambda 1_{0}=0\}_{\circ}$ (2) $\phi\in M(\ell,\mathfrak{g})$ $\ell+0^{\perp}\subset G\cdot\ell$ (3) $\lambda\in 0^{\perp}$ $O\in M(\ell+\lambda,g)$ 1. $G^{-}\text{_{}}$ $M(P,\mathfrak{g})$ Pukanszky 2.1. (Bemmat [6], Pukanszky [40], Takenouchi [43]) $l\in n^{*},$ $0\in S(\ell,g)$ (1 ) $I(\ell,g)\neq\otimes$ (2) $O\in 1(\ell,g)\Leftrightarrow 0$ Pukanszky (3) $0_{1},0_{z}\in I(P,\mathfrak{g})$ \ell,y,, $G$ ) $\cong$ (4) (1) (3) $\hat{p}=\hat{p}_{g}$ (5) $\ell_{1},$ ) $\Theta_{G}$ : $\ell_{2}\in g^{*}$ $\text{}\ell_{1}$ : $g^{*}/garrow\hat{g}$ $\mathfrak{g}^{*}arrow\hat{g}$ \ell,y2 $G$ ) () $\hat{p}$ ) ) $=\hat{\mu}p_{2}$ $\Leftrightarrow G\cdot P_{1}=G\cdot\ell_{2}$ (Kirillov $0^{*}/G$ Fell $\hat{g}$ 2.2. (Ludwig [28]) $e_{g}$ : $\mathfrak{g}^{*}/garrow\hat{g}$ \S 3. Frobenius $G=\exp\Phi$ $H=\exp 0$ $\chi$ $\tau=ind_{h}^{g}\chi$ $f\in $O\in S(f,g)$ $\chi=\chi_{f}$ \mathfrak{g}^{*}$ Pukanszky $\mathfrak{g}^{*}$ G $H-$ $\Gamma_{\tau}$ $\tilde{\mu}$ $0^{*}$ $\Gamma_{\tau}=f+O^{\perp}$ Kirillov $\mu=(\hat{p}_{g})_{*}(\tilde{\mu})$ $\pi\in\hat{g}$ $\Omega(\pi)$ $\Omega(\pi)=(\hat{p}_{G})^{-1}(\pi)_{\text{}}\Gamma_{\tau}\cap\Omega(\pi)$ $H$ $m(\pi)$ $\hat{g}$ $\mu$ $m(\pi)$ 22
5 $\hat{\mu}$ 3.1. (cf. [18]) $\tau\cong\int_{\hat{g}}^{\oplus}m(\pi)\pi d\mu(\pi)$ $K=\exp f$ $G$ $\pi\in\hat{g}$ $G-$ $\Omega(\pi)$ $\tilde{\gamma}=\tilde{\gamma}_{\pi}$ $\Omega(\pi)$ $\mathfrak{g}^{*}$ $p:g^{*}arrow f^{*}$ $\gamma=(\hat{p}_{k}\circ p)_{*}(\tilde{\gamma})$ $\sigma\in\hat{k}$ $0$) $(\sigma)=(\hat{p}_{k})^{-1}(\sigma)\subset 9^{*}$ $\Omega(\pi)\cap p^{-1}(ox\sigma))$ $K-$ $n_{\pi}(\sigma)$ $\hat{k}$ $\gamma$ $n_{\pi}(\sigma)$ $\pi\in\hat{g}$ $K$ $\pi _{K}$ 3.2. (cf. [19]) $\pi 1_{K}$ $\cong\int_{\hat{k}}^{\oplus}n_{\pi}(\sigma)d\gamma(\sigma)$ $\pi_{j}(j=1,2)$ $G$ 2 - $\pi_{1}\cross\pi_{2}$ $G\cross G$ $(\Omega(\pi_{1}), = $\pi_{1}\cross\pi_{2}$ $\pi_{1}\otimes\pi_{2}$ \Omega(\pi_{2}))\subset \mathfrak{g}^{*}\oplus \mathfrak{g}^{*}$ $G$ $G\cross G$ $\pi_{1}$ $\pi_{2}$ 1. $p:\mathfrak{g}^{*}\oplus \mathfrak{g}^{*}arrow g^{*}$ $\gamma=(\hat{p}_{g}\circ p)_{*}(\tilde{\gamma}_{\pi_{1}\cross\pi_{2}})$ $\pi\in\hat{g}$ $(\Omega(\pi_{1}),\Omega(\pi_{2}))\cap p^{-1}(\omega(\pi))$ $G$ $m(\pi)$ $\pi_{1}\otimes\pi_{2}\cong\int_{\hat{g}}^{\oplus}m(\pi)\pi d\gamma(\pi)$ $\sigma\in\hat{k}$ 3.1 $ind_{k}^{g}\sigma$ $g^{*}$ $p^{-1}(ox\sigma))$ $0$) $(\sigma)$ $K$ $\hat{\mu}$ $\hat{g}$ $\mu$ ind $GH\sigma$ $g^{*}$ $\tilde{\mu}$ $\mu=(\hat{p}_{g})_{*}(\tilde{\mu})$ 3.2 $\hat{g}\ni\pi$ $\vdash\rightarrow n_{\pi}(\sigma)$ 3.3. (cf. [19]) $ind_{h}^{g}\sigma\equiv\int_{\hat{g}}^{\oplus}n_{\pi}(\sigma)\pi d\mu(\pi)$ Frobenius $G=\exp \mathfrak{g}$ 3.1 $\tau=ind_{h}^{g}\chi_{f}$ 23
6 $\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{arrow}$ \S 4. $G$ $\pi$ () $\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}$ $G\ni g\mapsto\pi(g)v\in$ $C^{\infty}$. $v\in$ $\pi \text{}c^{\infty}-$ $g$ $d\pi$ : $d \pi(x)v=\frac{d}{dt}\pi(\exp(tx))v[_{=0}(x\in A, v\in\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{\infty})$ $\pi$ $d\pi$ A $\mathscr{u}(p)$ $\{X_{j}\}_{1\leq j\leq n}$ $g$ $\mathfrak{p}_{\pi}(x^{a})\mathcal{v} = \oint\pi(x)^{\alpha_{1}}\cdots d4x_{n})^{\alpha_{*}}v t\alpha=(\alpha_{1},\ldots,\alpha_{n})\in \mathbb{z}_{+}^{n},$ $\mathbb{z}_{+}=\{0\}\cup N$ $\pi$ = $\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{arrow}$ $\langle a,b\rangle$ $a\in\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{n}^{b$ $b\in\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{\mp\infty}$ $G$ A $G$ $C^{\infty}$ (G) $\phi\in$ G) \mbox{\boldmath $\pi$}(\mbox{\boldmath $\phi$}) $\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{n}^{arrow}\subset$ $-j$ I/ $dg$ $\pi(\phi)$ $G$ $\pi(\phi)=\int_{g}\phi(g)\pi(g)dg$ $[7]_{\text{}}[8]_{\text{}}$ [38] $G=\exp$ $ $\pi$ 2.1 $\ell\in g^{*}$ $r$ polarization $\mathfrak{n}$ $\pi$ $\mu\ell,h,g$) $h=f_{0}\subset f_{1}\subset\cdots\subset f_{d}=\mathfrak{g}\dim f_{j+1}/f_{j}=1(0\leq j\leq d-1)$ $\tilde{x}_{j}\in f_{j+1}\backslash f_{j}(0\leq j\leq d-1)$ $\Phi:\mathbb{R}^{d}\cross B\ni(t,b)I\Rightarrow(\prod_{j=d}^{1}\exp(t_{j}X_{j}))b\in G,$ $C=(t_{1},\ldots,t_{d}),$ $B=\exp b$ $\Phi$ $\Phi$ $G/H$ = $\pi$ $L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$ $i$) $-$ 4.1. $d\pi(\mathscr{u}(a))$ (cf. [11]) (Rd) = $\pi$ = $G$ 24
7 $a_{\pi}^{k}$ : j $K$ $\chi:karrow \mathbb{c}^{*}$ $(\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{arrow})^{\kappa_{x} =\{a\in\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{arrow} : \pi(k)a=\chi(k)a, \forall k\in K\}$ $\tau=ind_{h}^{g}\chi_{f}$ $G$ $e$ $6_{\tau}\in(\ovalbox{\ttREJECT}_{\tau}^{\infty})^{H,\chi_{f}$ $6_{\tau}$ $\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{\infty}\ni\psiarrow\overline{\psi(e)}\in \mathbb{c}$ : ( 3.1) $m(\pi)$ Penney [37] = $6_{\tau}$ : $6_{\tau}= \int_{\hat{g}}^{\oplus}\sum_{k=1}^{m(\pi)}a_{\pi}^{k}d\mu(\pi)_{\text{}}$ (41) $a_{\pi}^{k}\in(\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{r)^{h,\chi_{f}}(1\leq k\leq m(\pi))$ $H$ $1\backslash$ $\phi\in$ G) $dh$ $\phi_{h}^{f}\in $\phi_{h}^{f}(g)=\int_{h}\phi(gh)\chi_{f}(h)dh(g\in G)$ \text{_{}\tau}^{\infty}$ $\tau(\phi)$ $G$ $J\backslash$-$js$ $dg_{\text{}}$ $v_{g,h}$ $v_{g,h}=dg/dh$ $\phi\in \mathfrak{u}(g)$ $\phi_{h}^{f}(e)=\langle\tau(\phi)6_{\tau},6_{\tau}\rangle$ (4-1) $\phi_{h}^{f}(e)=\int_{\hat{g}}\sum_{k=1}^{m(\pi)}\langle\pi(\phi)a_{\pi}^{k},a_{\pi}^{k}\rangle d\mu(\pi)$ (4-2) = $a_{\pi}^{k}$ (4-1) (4-2) $\pi\in\hat{g}$ $l\in\omega(\pi)$ polarisation $u\in M(\ell,\mathfrak{g})$ \ell, $u$, $G$ ) 3.1 $\Gamma_{\tau}\cap\Omega(\pi)$ $g_{k}\in G$ $H$ $C_{1},$ $\ldots,$ $C_{m(\pi)}$ $1\leq k\leq m(\pi)$ $g_{k}\cdot\ell\in C_{k}$ 4.2. (cf. [17]) $H/H\cap g_{k}bg_{k}^{-1}$ $(\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{arrow})^{h,\chi_{f}$ $d_{k}h$ $\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{\infty}\ni\psiarrow\int_{h/h\cap g,bg_{\overline{t}^{1}}\overline{\psi(hg_{k})\chi_{f}(h)}d_{k}\dot{h}(1\leq k\leq m(\pi))$ $m(\pi)$ == (4-2) 2. ( 3.1) $m(\pi)$ = (4-1) (cf. [20]. [33]) (cf. [31) Lipsman = = 25
8 (cf. $[12]_{\text{}}[\mathfrak{B}]_{\text{}}$ [30]) \S 5. $H$ $\chi_{f}$ $G/H$. $--$. $--$ $G-$ $D_{\tau}(G/H)$ $0$ $\{Y_{j}\}_{1\leq j\leq d}(d=\dim 0)$ (g) $= \sum_{j1}^{\text{}}\mathbb{c}(y_{j}+if(y_{j}))$ (g) $\mathscr{u}(p)\mathfrak{n}_{\tau}$ $\mathscr{u}(g,\tau)=$ { $A\in\%(\mathfrak{g}):[A,Y]\in u(a)\mathfrak{n}_{\tau}$ fy $\in 0$ } $\mathscr{u}($ $G$ D\tau (G/ $\mathscr{u}(g,\tau)/\mathscr{u}(a)0_{\tau}$ D\tau (G/ Corwin-Greenleaf [10] 5.1. (cf. [101) ( 3.1) D\tau (G/ 1. () \Leftrightarrow D\tau (G/ 2. () D\tau (G/ 1 $H-$ $C[\Gamma_{\tau}]^{H}$ 3. 1 Duflo [16] Corwin-Greenleaf [10] 2 $\phi\in$ $G$ ) (4-2) $\phi_{h}^{f}(g)=\int_{\hat{g}}\sum_{k=1}^{m(\pi)}\langle\pi(\phi_{g})a_{\pi}^{k},a_{\pi}^{k}\rangle d\mu(\pi)(\forall g\in G)_{\text{}}$ $\phi_{g}$ $\phi_{g}(x)=\phi(gx)(\forall x\in G)$ $\Phi\langle G$) $X\in \mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g})$ $(X \phi_{h}^{f})(g)=\int_{\hat{g}}\sum_{k=1}^{m(\pi)}\langle\pi(\phi)a_{\pi}^{k},d\pi(\overline{x})a_{\pi}^{k}\rangle d\mu(\pi)_{\text{}}$ (5-1) 5.2. (cf. [22]) $\mu$ $\hat{g}$ $a_{\pi}^{k}(1\leq k\leq m(\pi))$ (g,\tau ) 26
9 $X\in \mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g},\tau)$ $\Gamma_{\tau}$ $P_{X}$ $\ell\in\gamma_{\tau}$ : $H-$ k $\Omega(\pi)$ $d\pi(\overline{x})a_{\pi}^{k}=\overline{p_{x}(\ell}\nu_{\pi}^{k}$ $P_{X}$ $H$ $\Gamma_{\tau}$ X\in l(g) $P_{X}\equiv 0$ (5-1) $D_{\tau}(G/H)\cong \mathscr{u}(g,\tau)/\mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g})\mathfrak{n}_{\tau}\ni[x]\vdash\rightarrow P_{X}$ 2 (1) $P_{X}$ $\Gamma_{\tau}$ ; (2) (1) (g,\tau )/?X(9) $\mathfrak{n}_{\tau}\ni[x]$ $\vdash\rightarrow P_{X}\in C[\Gamma_{r},]^{H}$ ; 2 2 (cf. $[4]_{\text{}}[21]$ ) = $P_{X}$? 2 \S Baklouti $Lion_{\text{}}Magneron_{\text{}}$ Mehdi $\Phi$ $\{0\}=\iota_{0}\subset \mathfrak{g}_{1}\subset\cdots\subset$ -1\subset \sim $=\mathfrak{g}$ $O\cap g_{i}\neq 0\cap \mathfrak{g}_{i-1}$ $i(1\leq i\leq n)$ $\mathcal{j}=\{\dot{q}<\dot{a}<\cdots<i_{d}\}$ $(d=\dim 0)$ $\ovalbox{\ttreject}=\{1,2, \ldots, n\}\backslash \ovalbox{\ttreject}=\{j_{1<j_{2}<\cdots<j_{p}\(p=\dim$ $/O} $f_{0}=\mathfrak{h},$ $f_{r}=\mathfrak{h}+\mathfrak{g}_{j_{r}}(1\leq r\leq p)$ $g$ $0=l_{0}\subset f_{1}\subset\cdots\subset f_{p-1}\subset e_{p}=\mathfrak{g}(\dim t_{r}/f_{r-1}=1)$ $0_{0}=\{0\},$ $0_{S}=0\cap \mathfrak{g}_{i_{s}}(1\leq s\leq d)$ $0$ $\{0\}=0_{0}\subset 0_{1}\subset\cdots\subset 0_{d-1}\subset\phi_{d}=1(\dim 0_{s}=s)$ $\overline{y}_{s}\in 0_{s}\backslash 0_{s-1}(1\leq s\leq d)$ $X_{r}\in f_{r}\backslash f_{r- 1}(1\leq r\leq p)$ $0$ $\mathfrak{g}$ $K_{j}=\exp f_{j}$ $\tau_{j}=ind_{h}^{k_{j}}\chi_{f}(0\leq j\leq p)$ $\mathbb{c}=d_{\tau_{\text{}}}(k_{0}/h)\subset D_{\tau_{1}}(K_{1}/H)\subset\cdots\subset D_{\tau_{p-1}}(K_{p-1}/H)\subset D_{\tau_{p}}(K_{P}/H)=D_{\tau}(G/H)$ = $D_{\tau}(G/H)$ $\tau_{j_{0}- 1}$ = $\tau_{j_{0}}$ = $i_{0}(1\leq j_{0}\leq p)$ 6.1. (cf. Greenleaf [26]. Fujiwan-Lion-Mehdi [24]) 27
10 $D_{\tau_{j_{0^{-1}}}}(K_{j\text{}-1}/H) \neq D_{\tau_{h}}(K_{j_{0}}\int H)$ $D_{\tau_{j\text{}}}(K_{j_{0}}/H)$ = $V$ $K$ $V$ $0\neq x\in V$ $K-$ $K$ $\Omega\subset V$ 2 = $\Omega+\mathbb{R}x\subset\Omega$ $v\in\omega$ (v+&)\cap \Omega $=\{v\}$ $\Omega$ $x-$ $\tau_{j}(1\leq j\leq p)$ $H-$ $r_{j_{0}}=\{p\in f_{j_{0}}^{*} : \ell 1_{1}=f1_{0}\}$ $K_{j_{0}}$ $H-$ - $f_{j_{0^{-}}1^{-}}$. $\Gamma_{j}$ $H$ 1- ) ( $D_{\tau_{j}}(K_{j}/H$ $=D_{\tau_{j-1}}(K_{j-1}/H)$ = Corwin-Greenleaf [10] ) $n-1$ $G$ $j=n$ $d=\dim\phi=1$ $(\alpha 0)$ $0$ $m$ $ad0-$ $\beta:s(g)arrow \mathscr{u}(p)$ $s(m)$ = $\beta$ (B) $\mathfrak{n}_{\tau}$ = $\dim 0$ $0 =0_{d-1},$ $g =f_{p-1}$, $H=\exp 0,$ $G =\exp p,$ $\tau =ind_{h }^{G}\chi_{f}$, $=ind_{h }^{G }\chi_{f}$ $\Gamma_{\tau}$ $D_{\tau}(G/H)\neq D_{\tau_{p- 1}}(G /H)$ $H-$ $(\mathfrak{g} )^{\perp}-$ $H$ $(\mathfrak{g} )^{\perp}$ $\Gamma_{r }$, $H$ $W\in \mathscr{u}(n,\tau )$ $\mathscr{u}(g )+\mathscr{u}(a)\mathfrak{n}_{\tau }$ $W$ $W\not\in\ (9 )+0\ (9)\text{}$ $ady_{d}$ (g,\tau ) $ady_{d}$ $W$ 6.1. (cf. Baklouti-Fujiwara [2]) $\mathscr{u}(g )+\mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g})\text{}$ $\mathscr{u}(a,\tau )\not\subset \mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g},\tau_{p-,)}$ $\mathscr{u}(g,\tau)$ 28
11 6.1 $\mathscr{u}(9,\tau )\not\subset \mathscr{u}(p,\tau_{p-1})$ = $l\in\gamma_{\tau}$ $B_{\ell}$ $Y_{d}\in\phi$ $\mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g},\tau )=\mathscr{u}(\phi^{j},\tau_{p-1})$ $0_{d-1}\cap 0^{\ell}\neq 0_{d}\cap$ $\ell\in\gamma_{\tau}$ = $\tau_{p-1}$ == $[Y_{d},W]\in \mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g})\mathfrak{n}_{\tau}$ $T(\Gamma_{\tau})=$ $\{\text{} <m_{2}<\cdots<m_{q}\}$ = $\ell\in\gamma_{\pi}$ $A_{k-1}\cap g^{\ell}\neq$ $\cap$ $k(1\leq k\leq n)$ Corwin-Greenleaf [10] $\Gamma_{\tau}-$ $\{\sigma_{1}, \sigma_{2}, \ldots, \sigma_{q}\}$ $\sigma_{j}(1\leq j\leq q)$ $m_{j}$ $\sim \text{},$ ) $\backslash 1(\text{_{}-1})$ = $\ell\in\gamma_{\tau}$ $d\hat{p}(u\sigma_{j})$ $=m_{k}$ $k(1\leq k\leq q)$ $\mathscr{u}(g)$ $\gamma$ ; 6.2. (Fujiwara-Lion-Magneron-Mehdi) $\mathscr{u}\mathscr{u}(g$,-1 $Y_{d}$ $\gamma(\sigma_{1})$, $)$ $\cdot$.., $\gamma(o_{k})$ $[V,\gamma(\sigma_{j})]\in \mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g})u_{\tau}(1\leq j\leq q)$ $\mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g})$ $V$ 62 $[W,Y_{d}]\in \mathscr{u}(n)\mathfrak{n}_{\tau}$ $W\in \mathscr{u}(g,\tau)$ [1] L. Auslander and B. Kostant, Polarization and unitary representations of solvable Lie groups, Invent. math. 14 (1971), [2] A. Baklouti et H. Fujiwara, Op\ erateurs diff\ erentiels associ\ es \ a certaines repr\ esentations unitaires d un groupe de Lie r\ esoluble exponentiel, Pr\ epublication. [3] A. Baklouti and J. Ludwig, The Penney-Fujiwara Plancherel formula for nilpotent Lie groups, J. Maffi. Kyoto Univ. 40 $(20(\mathfrak{P}),$ $1-11$. [4] A. Baklouti and J. Ludwig, Invariant differential operators on certain nilpotent homogeneous 29
12 spaces, to appear in Monatsheft f\"ur Math.. [5] Y. Benoist, Espaces sym\ etriques exponentiels, Th\ ese de $3e$ cycle, Univ. de Paris VI, [6] P. Bemat et al., Repr\ esentations des Groupes de Lie R\ esolubles, Dunod, Paris, [7] P. Bonnet, Transformation de Fourier des distributions de type positif sur un groupe de Lie unimodulaire, J. Func. Anal. 55 (1984), [8] P. Cartier, Vecteurs diff\ erentiables dans les repr\ esentations unitaires des groupes de Lie, Lect. Notes in Math. Springer 514 (1975), [9] L. Corwin, F. P. Greenleaf and G. Gr\ elaud, Direct integral decomposition and multiplicities for induced representations of nilpotent Lie groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 304 (1987), M9-5. [10] L. Corwin and F. P. Greenleaf, Commutativity of invariant differential operators on nilpotent homogeneous spaces with finite multiplicity, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 45 (1992), [11] L. Corwin and F. P. Greenleaf, Representations of Nilpotent Lie Groups and Their Applications, $PaIt$ I, Cambridge Univ. Press, [12] B. N. Currey, Smooth decomposition of finite multiplicity monomial representation for a class of completely solvable homogeneous spaces, Pacific J. Math. 170 (1995), [13] J. Dixmier, L application exponentielle dans les groupes de Lie r\ esolubles, Bull. Soc. Math. France 85 (1957), [14] J. Dixmier, Sur les repr\ esentations unitaires des groupes de Lie nilpotents $I\sim VI$ : I, Amer. J. Math. 10 (1958), : I; V, Bull. Soc. Math. France 85 (1957), ; 87 (1959), 65-79: $m;n;vi$, Canad. J. Math. 10 (1958), ; 11 (1959), ; 12 (1960), [15] J. Dixmier, Alg\ ebres Enveloppantes, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, [16] M. Duflo, Open problems in representation theory of Lie groups, Conference $on$ $Analysis$ on homogeneous spaces, edited by T. Oshima, 1-5, Katata, Japan, [17] H. Fujiwara, Repr\ esentations monomiales des groupes de Lie nilpotents, Pacific J. Math. 127 (1987), [18] H. Fujiwara, Repr\ esentations monomiales des groupes de Lie r\ esolubles exponentiels, dans: M. Duflo, N. Pedersen and M. Vergne $(eds.)$, The orbit methtr in representation theory, Copenhagen, 1988; Birkh\"auser [19] H. Fujiwara, Sur les restrictions des repr\ esentations unitaires des groupes de Lie r\ esolubles exponentiels, Invent. math. 104 (1991), [20] H. Fujiwara, $U$ formule de Plancherel pour les repr\ esentations monomiales des groupes 30
13 de Lie nilpotents, dans: Kawazoe, T. Oshima and S. Sano $T$ $(eds.)$, Representation Theory of Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, Kawaguchiko, Japan, 1990; World Scientific [21] H. Fujiwara, Sur la conjecture de Corwin-Greenleaf, J. Lie Theory 7 (1997), [22] H. Fujiwara, Analyse harmonique pour certaines repr\ esentations induites d un groupe de Lie nilpotent, J. Math. Soc. Japan, 50 (1998), [23] H. Fujiwara et S. Yamagami, Certaines repr\ esentations monomiales des groupes de Lie r\ esolubles exponentiels, Adv. St. Pure Math. 14 (1988), [24] H. Fujiwara, G. Lion and S. Mehdi, On the commutativity of the algebra of invariant differential operators on certain nilpotent homogeneous spaces, Preprint. [25] F. P. Greenleaf, Harmonic analysis on nilpotent homogeneous spaces, Contemporary Math. 177 (1994), [26] F. P. Greenleaf, Geometry of coadjoint orbits and noncommutativity of invariant differential operators on nilpotent homogeneous spaces, Preprint. [27] A. A. Kirillov, Repr\ esentations unitaires des groupes de Lie nilpotents, Uspekhi Math. Nauk. 17 (1962), [28] H. Leptin and J. Ludwig, Unitary Representation Theory of Exponential Lie Groups, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, [29] R. Lipsman, Orbital parameters for induced and restricted representations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 313 (1989), [30] R. Lipsman, The Penney-Fujiwara Plancherel formula for abelian symmetric spaces and completely solvable homogeneous spaces, Pacific J. Math. 151 (1991), [31] R. Lipsman, Attributes and applications of the Corwin-Greenleaf multiplicity function, Contemporary Math. 177 (1994), [32] R. Lipsman, Orbital symmetric spaces and finite multiplicity, J. Func. Anal. 135 (1996), [33] R.Lipsman, A unified approach to concrete Plancherel theory of homogeneous spaces, manuscripta math. 94 (1997), [34] G. W. Mackey, Induced representations of locally compact groups I ; I, Ann. Math. 55 (1952), ; ibid, 58 (1953), [35] G. W. Mackey, Unitary representations of group extensions, Acta Math. 99 (1958), [36] N. Pedersen, On the infinitesimal kernel of irreducible representations of nilpotent Lie groups, Bull. Soc. Math. France 112 (1984), [37] R. Penney, Abstract Plancherel theorem and a Frobenius reciprocity theorem, J. Func. 31
14 Anal 18 (197\epsilon, $C^{\infty}$ [38] N. S. Poulsen, On -vectors and intertwining bilinear form$s$ for representations of Lie groups, J. Func. Anal. 9 (1972), [39] L. Pukanszky, ur $\infty ons$ $s$ les Repr\ esentations de Groupes, Duntr, Paris, [40] L. Pukanszky, On the theory of exponential groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 126 (1967), q- ff. [41] L. Pukanszky, $UnitaI\gamma$ representations of solvable Lie groups, Ann. Sci. Ec. Norm. Sup. 4 (1971), $457-\infty 8$. [42] M. Saito, Sur certains groupes de Lie r\ esolubles I ; I, Sci. Papers of the College of General Educ. Tokyo 7(1957), 1-11; [43] O. Takenouchi, Sur la facteur-repr\ esentation d un groupe de Lie r\ esoluble de type (E), Math. J. Okayama Univ. 7(1957),
CAPELLI (T\^o $\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}$ UMEDA) MATHEMATICS, KYOTO UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT $\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}$ $0$:, Cape i,.,.,,,,.,,,.
1508 2006 1-11 1 CAPELLI (T\^o $\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}$ UMEDA) MATHEMATICS KYOTO UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT $\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}$ $0$: Cape i Capelli 1991 ( ) (1994 ; 1998 ) 100 Capelli Capelli Capelli ( ) (
Λ (Kyo Nishiyama) 1 p q r ( determinantal variety) n n r Kostant ( Rallis, Steinberg ) D 1980 Borho-Brylinski Vogan Springer theta theta theta
Λ (Kyo Nishiyama) 1 p q r ( determinantal variety) n n r 1960 70 Kostant ( Rallis, Steinberg ) D 1980 Borho-Brylinski Vogan Springer theta theta theta theta ( ) Λ ( ) August 9, 2000 Theta lifting of representations
compact compact Hermann compact Hermite ( - ) Hermann Hermann ( ) compact Hermite Lagrange compact Hermite ( ) a, Σ a {0} a 3 1
014 5 4 compact compact Hermann compact Hermite ( - ) Hermann Hermann ( ) compact Hermite Lagrange compact Hermite ( ) 1 1.1. a, Σ a {0} a 3 1 (1) a = span(σ). () α, β Σ s α β := β α,β α α Σ. (3) α, β
数理解析研究所講究録 第1908巻
1908 2014 78-85 78 1 D3 1 [20] Born [18, 21] () () RIMS ( 1834) [19] ( [16] ) [1, 23, 24] 2 $\Vert A\Vert^{2}$ $c*$ - $*:\mathcal{x}\ni A\mapsto A^{*}\in \mathcal{x}$ $\Vert A^{*}A\Vert=$ $\Vert\cdot\Vert$
可約概均質ベクトル空間の$b$-関数と一般Verma加群
1825 2013 35-55 35 $b$- Verma (Akihito Wachi) Faculty of Education, Hokkaido University of Education Capelli Capelli 6 1 2009 6 [4] $(1\leq i,j\leq n)$ $\det(a)= A =\sum_{\sigma}$ sgn $(\sigma)a_{\sigma(1)1}\cdots
(Masatake MORI) 1., $I= \int_{-1}^{1}\frac{dx}{\mathrm{r}_{2-x})(1-\mathcal{i}1}.$ (1.1) $\overline{(2-x)(1-\mathcal{i})^{1}/4(1
1040 1998 143-153 143 (Masatake MORI) 1 $I= \int_{-1}^{1}\frac{dx}{\mathrm{r}_{2-x})(1-\mathcal{i}1}$ (11) $\overline{(2-x)(1-\mathcal{i})^{1}/4(1+x)3/4}$ 1974 [31 8 10 11] $I= \int_{a}^{b}f(\mathcal{i})d_{x}$
0. I II I II (1) linear type: GL( ), Sp( ), O( ), (2) loop type: loop current Kac-Moody affine, hyperbolic (3) diffeo t
e-mail: [email protected] 0. I II I II (1) linear type: GL( ), Sp( ), O( ), (2) loop type: loop current Kac-Moody affine, hyperbolic (3) diffeo type: diffeo universal Teichmuller modular I. I-. Weyl
k + (1/2) S k+(1/2) (Γ 0 (N)) N p Hecke T k+(1/2) (p 2 ) S k+1/2 (Γ 0 (N)) M > 0 2k, M S 2k (Γ 0 (M)) Hecke T 2k (p) (p M) 1.1 ( ). k 2 M N M N f S k+
1 SL 2 (R) γ(z) = az + b cz + d ( ) a b z h, γ = SL c d 2 (R) h 4 N Γ 0 (N) {( ) } a b Γ 0 (N) = SL c d 2 (Z) c 0 mod N θ(z) θ(z) = q n2 q = e 2π 1z, z h n Z Γ 0 (4) j(γ, z) ( ) a b θ(γ(z)) = j(γ, z)θ(z)
cubic zeta 1ifting (Tomoyoshi IBUKIYAMA) (Department of Math., Graduate School of Sci., Osaka Univ. 1 \Re $\Phi^{\mathrm{J}}$ 1
1398 2004 137-148 137 cubic zeta 1ifting (Tomoyoshi IBUKIYAMA) (Department of Math., Graduate School of Sci., Osaka Univ. 1 \Re $\Phi^{\mathrm{J}}$ 1 W. Kohnen } $SL_{2}(\mathbb{Z})$ 1 1 2 1 1 1 \sigma
2016 Course Description of Undergraduate Seminars (2015 12 16 ) 2016 12 16 ( ) 13:00 15:00 12 16 ( ) 1 21 ( ) 1 13 ( ) 17:00 1 14 ( ) 12:00 1 21 ( ) 15:00 1 27 ( ) 13:00 14:00 2 1 ( ) 17:00 2 3 ( ) 12
[AI] G. Anderson, Y. Ihara, Pro-l branched cov erings of P1 and higher circular l-units, Part 1 Ann. of Math. 128 (1988), 271-293 ; Part 2, Intern. J. Math. 1 (1990), 119-148. [B] G. V. Belyi, On Galois
単純パラエルミート対称空間の等長変換群について (新しい変換群論とその周辺)
数理解析研究所講究録第 2016 巻 2017 年 142-147 142 単純パラエルミート対称空間の等長変換群について 東京理科大学大学院理学研究科 Dl 下川拓哉 Takuya Shimokawa Graduate School of Science Mathematics Tokyo University of Science 1 初めに 本稿の内容は杉本恭司氏 ( 東京理科大学大学院理学研究科
一般演題(ポスター)
6 5 13 : 00 14 : 00 A μ 13 : 00 14 : 00 A β β β 13 : 00 14 : 00 A 13 : 00 14 : 00 A 13 : 00 14 : 00 A β 13 : 00 14 : 00 A β 13 : 00 14 : 00 A 13 : 00 14 : 00 A β 13 : 00 14 : 00 A 13 : 00 14 : 00 A
第86回日本感染症学会総会学術集会後抄録(II)
χ μ μ μ μ β β μ μ μ μ β μ μ μ β β β α β β β λ Ι β μ μ β Δ Δ Δ Δ Δ μ μ α φ φ φ α γ φ φ γ φ φ γ γδ φ γδ γ φ φ φ φ φ φ φ φ φ φ φ φ φ α γ γ γ α α α α α γ γ γ γ γ γ γ α γ α γ γ μ μ κ κ α α α β α
$\mathrm{s}$ DE ( Kenta Kobayashi ), (Hisashi Okamoto) (Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto Univ.) (Jinghui Zhu)
$\mathrm{s}$ 1265 2002 209-219 209 DE ( Kenta Kobayashi ), (Hisashi Okamoto) (Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto Univ) (Jinghui Zhu) 1 Iiitroductioii (Xiamen Univ) $c$ (Fig 1) Levi-Civita
A MATLAB Toolbox for Parametric Rob TitleDesign based on symbolic computatio Design of Algorithms, Implementatio Author(s) 坂部, 啓 ; 屋並, 仁史 ; 穴井, 宏和 ; 原
A MATLAB Toolbox for Parametric Rob TitleDesign based on symbolic computatio Design of Algorithms, Implementatio Author(s) 坂部, 啓 ; 屋並, 仁史 ; 穴井, 宏和 ; 原, 辰次 Citation 数理解析研究所講究録 (2004), 1395: 231-237 Issue
105 $\cdot$, $c_{0},$ $c_{1},$ $c_{2}$, $a_{0},$ $a_{1}$, $\cdot$ $a_{2}$,,,,,, $f(z)=a_{0}+a_{1}z+a_{2}z^{2}+\cdots$ (16) $z=\emptyset(w)=b_{1}w+b_{2
1155 2000 104-119 104 (Masatake Mori) 1 $=\mathrm{l}$ 1970 [2, 4, 7], $=-$, $=-$,,,, $\mathrm{a}^{\mathrm{a}}$,,, $a_{0}+a_{1}z+a_{2}z^{2}+\cdots$ (11), $z=\alpha$ $c_{0}+c_{1}(z-\alpha)+c2(z-\alpha)^{2}+\cdots$
, CH n. CH n, CP n,,,., CH n,,. RH n ( Cartan )., CH n., RH n CH n,,., RH n, CH n., RH n ( ), CH n ( 1.1 (v), (vi) )., RH n,, CH n,., CH n,. 1.2, CH n
( ), Jürgen Berndt,.,. 1, CH n.,,. 1.1 ([6]). CH n (n 2), : (i) CH k (k = 0,..., n 1) tube. (ii) RH n tube. (iii). (iv) ruled minimal, equidistant. (v) normally homogeneous submanifold F k tube. (vi) normally
. Mac Lane [ML98]. 1 2 (strict monoidal category) S 1 R 3 A S 1 [0, 1] C 2 C End C (1) C 4 1 U q (sl 2 ) Drinfeld double. 6 2
2014 6 30. 2014 3 1 6 (Hopf algebra) (group) Andruskiewitsch-Santos [AFS09] 1980 Drinfeld (quantum group) Lie Lie (ribbon Hopf algebra) (ribbon category) Turaev [Tur94] Kassel [Kas95] (PD) [email protected]
Archimedean Spiral 1, ( ) Archimedean Spiral Archimedean Spiral ( $\mathrm{b}.\mathrm{c}$ ) 1 P $P$ 1) Spiral S
Title 初期和算にみる Archimedean Spiral について ( 数学究 ) Author(s) 小林, 龍彦 Citation 数理解析研究所講究録 (2000), 1130: 220-228 Issue Date 2000-02 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/63667 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion
2.1 H f 3, SL(2, Z) Γ k (1) f H (2) γ Γ f k γ = f (3) f Γ \H cusp γ SL(2, Z) f k γ Fourier f k γ = a γ (n)e 2πinz/N n=0 (3) γ SL(2, Z) a γ (0) = 0 f c
GL 2 1 Lie SL(2, R) GL(2, A) Gelbart [Ge] 1 3 [Ge] Jacquet-Langlands [JL] Bump [Bu] Borel([Bo]) ([Ko]) ([Mo]) [Mo] 2 2.1 H = {z C Im(z) > 0} Γ SL(2, Z) Γ N N Γ (N) = {γ SL(2, Z) γ = 1 2 mod N} g SL(2,
( ) 1., ([SU] ): F K k., Z p -, (cf. [Iw2], [Iw3], [Iw6]). K F F/K Z p - k /k., Weil., K., K F F p- ( 4.1).,, Z p -,., Weil..,,. Weil., F, F projectiv
( ) 1 ([SU] ): F K k Z p - (cf [Iw2] [Iw3] [Iw6]) K F F/K Z p - k /k Weil K K F F p- ( 41) Z p - Weil Weil F F projective smooth C C Jac(C)/F ( ) : 2 3 4 5 Tate Weil 6 7 Z p - 2 [Iw1] 2 21 K k k 1 k K
Siegel Hecke 1 Siege Hecke L L Fourier Dirichlet Hecke Euler L Euler Fourier Hecke [Fr] Andrianov [An2] Hecke Satake L van der Geer ([vg]) L [Na1] [Yo
Siegel Hecke 1 Siege Hecke L L Fourier Dirichlet Hecke Euler L Euler Fourier Hecke [Fr] Andrianov [An2] Hecke Satake L van der Geer ([vg]) L [Na1] [Yo] 2 Hecke ( ) 0 1n J n =, Γ = Γ n = Sp(n, Z) = {γ GL(2n,
診療ガイドライン外来編2014(A4)/FUJGG2014‐01(大扉)
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
( ) Lemma 2.2. X ultra filter (1) X = X 1 X 2 X 1 X 2 (2) X = X 1 X 2 X 3... X N X 1, X 2,..., X N (3) disjoint union X j Definition 2.3. X ultra filt
NON COMMTATIVE ALGEBRAIC SPACE OF FINITE ARITHMETIC TYPE ( ) 1. Introduction (1) (2) universality C ( ) R (1) (2) ultra filter 0 (1) (1) ( ) (2) (2) (3) 2. ultra filter Definition 2.1. X F filter (1) F
1.2 (Kleppe, cf. [6]). C S 3 P 3 3 S 3. χ(p 3, I C (3)) 1 C, C P 3 ( ) 3 S 3( S 3 S 3 ). V 3 del Pezzo (cf. 2.1), S V, del Pezzo 1.1, V 3 del Pe
3 del Pezzo (Hirokazu Nasu) 1 [10]. 3 V C C, V Hilbert scheme Hilb V [C]. C V C S V S. C S S V, C V. Hilbert schemes Hilb V Hilb S [S] [C] ( χ(s, N S/V ) χ(c, N C/S )), Hilb V [C] (generically non-reduced)
平成 15 年度 ( 第 25 回 ) 数学入門公開講座テキスト ( 京都大学数理解析研究所, 平成 ~8 15 月年 78 日開催月 4 日 ) X 2 = 1 ( ) f 1 (X 1,..., X n ) = 0,..., f r (X 1,..., X n ) = 0 X = (
1 1.1 X 2 = 1 ( ) f 1 (X 1,..., X n ) = 0,..., f r (X 1,..., X n ) = 0 X = (X 1,..., X n ) ( ) X 1,..., X n f 1,..., f r A T X + XA XBR 1 B T X + C T QC = O X 1.2 X 1,..., X n X i X j X j X i = 0, P i
$\bullet$ A Distributed Sorting Algorithm on a Line Network: Adopting the Viewpoint of Sequential and Parallel Sorting Atsushi SASA
1120 1999 68-77 68 $\bullet$ A Distributed Sorting Algorithm on a Line Network Adopting the Viewpoint of Sequential and Parallel Sorting Atsushi SASAKI NTT $=$ 619-0237 2-4 $\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}$
$\overline{\circ\lambda_{\vec{a},q}^{\lambda}}f$ $\mathrm{o}$ (Gauge Tetsuo Tsuchida 1. $\text{ }..\cdot$ $\Omega\subset \mathrm{r}^
$\overle{\circ\lambda_{\vec{a}q}^{\lambda}}f$ $\mathrm{o}$ (Gauge 994 1997 15-31 15 Tetsuo Tsuchida 1 $\text{ }\cdot$ $\Omega\subset \mathrm{r}^{3}$ \Omega Dirac $L_{\vec{a}q}=L_{0}+(-\alpha\vec{a}(X)+q(_{X}))=\alpha
離散ラプラス作用素の反復力学系による蝶の翅紋様の実現とこれに基づく進化モデルの構成 (第7回生物数学の理論とその応用)
1751 2011 131-139 131 ( ) (B ) ( ) ( ) (1) (2) (3) (1) 4 (1) (2) (3) (2) $\ovalbox{\tt\small REJECT}$ (1) (2) (3) (3) D $N$ A 132 2 ([1]) 1 $0$ $F$ $f\in F$ $\Delta_{t\prime},f(p)=\sum_{\epsilon(\prime},(f(q)-f(p))$
36
36 37 38 P r R P 39 (1+r ) P =R+P g P r g P = R r g r g == == 40 41 42 τ R P = r g+τ 43 τ (1+r ) P τ ( P P ) = R+P τ ( P P ) n P P r P P g P 44 R τ P P = (1 τ )(r g) (1 τ )P R τ 45 R R σ u R= R +u u~ (0,σ
[2, 3, 4, 5] * C s (a m k (symmetry operation E m[ 1(a ] σ m σ (symmetry element E σ {E, σ} C s 32 ( ( =, 2 =, (3 0 1 v = x 1 1 +
2016 12 16 1 1 2 2 2.1 C s................. 2 2.2 C 3v................ 9 3 11 3.1.............. 11 3.2 32............... 12 3.3.............. 13 4 14 4.1........... 14 4.2................ 15 4.3................
0.,,., m Euclid m m. 2.., M., M R 2 ψ. ψ,, R 2 M.,, (x 1 (),, x m ()) R m. 2 M, R f. M (x 1,, x m ), f (x 1,, x m ) f(x 1,, x m ). f ( ). x i : M R.,,
2012 10 13 1,,,.,,.,.,,. 2?.,,. 1,, 1. (θ, φ), θ, φ (0, π),, (0, 2π). 1 0.,,., m Euclid m m. 2.., M., M R 2 ψ. ψ,, R 2 M.,, (x 1 (),, x m ()) R m. 2 M, R f. M (x 1,, x m ), f (x 1,, x m ) f(x 1,, x m ).
日本糖尿病学会誌第58巻第1号
α β β β β β β α α β α β α l l α l μ l β l α β β Wfs1 β β l l l l μ l l μ μ l μ l Δ l μ μ l μ l l ll l l l l l l l l μ l l l l μ μ l l l l μ l l l l l l l l l l μ l l l μ l μ l l l l l l l l l μ l l l l
数理解析研究所講究録 第1977巻
1977 2015 33-44 33 Ding-Iohara-Miki modular double Yosuke Saito Osaka City University Advanced Mathematical Institute 2015 9 30 Ding-Iohara-Miki Ruijsenaars Ding-Iohara-Miki Ding-Iohara-Miki modular double
44 $d^{k}$ $\alpha^{k}$ $k,$ $k+1$ k $k+1$ dk $d^{k}=- \frac{1}{h^{k}}\nabla f(x)k$ (2) $H^{k}$ Hesse k $\nabla^{2}f(x^{k})$ $ff^{k+1}=h^{k}+\triangle
Method) 974 1996 43-54 43 Optimization Algorithm by Use of Fuzzy Average and its Application to Flow Control Hiroshi Suito and Hideo Kawarada 1 (Steepest Descent Method) ( $\text{ }$ $\mathrm{m}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{h}_{0}\mathrm{d}$
1980年代半ば,米国中西部のモデル 理論,そして未来-モデル理論賛歌
2016 9 27 RIMS 1 2 3 1983 9-1989 6 University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) John T Baldwin 1983 9-1989 6 University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) John T Baldwin Y N Moschovakis, Descriptive Set Theory North
チュートリアル:ノンパラメトリックベイズ
{ x,x, L, xn} 2 p( θ, θ, θ, θ, θ, } { 2 3 4 5 θ6 p( p( { x,x, L, N} 2 x { θ, θ2, θ3, θ4, θ5, θ6} K n p( θ θ n N n θ x N + { x,x, L, N} 2 x { θ, θ2, θ3, θ4, θ5, θ6} log p( 6 n logθ F 6 log p( + λ θ F θ
四変数基本対称式の解放
Solving the simultaneous equation of the symmetric tetravariate polynomials and The roots of a quartic equation Oomori, Yasuhiro in Himeji City, Japan Dec.1, 2011 Abstract 1. S 4 2. 1. {α, β, γ, δ} (1)
330
330 331 332 333 334 t t P 335 t R t t i R +(P P ) P =i t P = R + P 1+i t 336 uc R=uc P 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 π π β τ τ (1+π ) (1 βτ )(1 τ ) (1+π ) (1 βτ ) (1 τ ) (1+π ) (1 τ ) (1 τ ) 344 (1 βτ )(1
Mazur [Ma1] Schlessinger [Sch] [SL] [Ma1] [Ma1] [Ma2] Galois [] 17 R m R R R M End R M) M R ut R M) M R R G R[G] R G Sets 1 Λ Noether Λ k Λ m Λ k C Λ
Galois ) 0 1 1 2 2 4 3 10 4 12 5 14 16 0 Galois Galois Galois TaylorWiles Fermat [W][TW] Galois Galois Galois 1 Noether 2 1 Mazur [Ma1] Schlessinger [Sch] [SL] [Ma1] [Ma1] [Ma2] Galois [] 17 R m R R R
数理解析研究所講究録 第1921巻
1921 2014 108-121 108 Local state, sector theory and measurement in AQFT 1 1 () $($local state) (quantum operation) ( RIMS ) () [25] ( [22] ) [5, 35, 36] 2 : $c*$ - $E_{\mathcal{X}}$ $\omega(a^{*}a)\geq
R R P N (C) 7 C Riemann R K ( ) C R C K 8 (R ) R C K 9 Riemann /C /C Riemann 10 C k 11 k C/k 12 Riemann k Riemann C/k k(c)/k R k F q Riemann 15
(Gen KUROKI) 1 1 : Riemann Spec Z 2? 3 : 4 2 Riemann Riemann Riemann 1 C 5 Riemann Riemann R compact R K C ( C(x) ) K C(R) Riemann R 6 (E-mail address: [email protected]) 1 1 ( 5 ) 2 ( Q ) Spec
5 36 5................................................... 36 5................................................... 36 5.3..............................
9 8 3............................................. 3.......................................... 4.3............................................ 4 5 3 6 3..................................................
