経済経営研究
|
|
|
- たつや にいだ
- 7 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Vol.26 No * * kntanak@dbj.go.jp
2 Bank Lending and Firm Investment under the Depression of the 1990s in Japan Economics Today, Vol.26, No.7, March, 2006 Kenji TANAKA Research Institute of Capital Formation Development Bank of Japan
3 Keywords JEL classification D92G32
4
5
6
7 q 1 capital crunch 2 Motonishi and Yoshikawa1999DI Motonishi and Yoshikawa1999 Gibson q Gibson Sekine credit crunch 2003Caballero, Hoshi and Kashyap debt overhang 1
8 2003 DI I = I ( q, BANK )1 Iq qbank 2
9 1 BANK BANK L = L ( X, BANK )2 LXBANK 2 DI DI DI 2 Woo Tsuru Ito and Sasaki2002 BANK BANK 90 3
10 Fazzar Hubbard and Petersen1988FHPHosh Kashyap and Scharfstein1991 HKSFHPHKS ISLM ISLM Kaplan and Zingales Ogawa and Suzuki
11 Ogawa and Suzuki
12 DI DI DI DI DI 97 DI GDP DS90 7 SS L 0 L 1 97 DI 7 6
13 /GDP
14 GDP 3. GDP 8
15 90 SS r 0 r DD r 0 r 1 L 0 L 1 3 SS 8 r 0 r r 1 D S' D S D' S' S r 0 r 2 r 0 r 1 0 L 1 L 0 0 L L 2 1 L 0 8 DI 9
16 Stiglitz and Weiss 1981 S 2-7 L 2 L 1 r 1 r 0 r 1 L 1 DI 2-7 S' S r 0 r 1 D 0 L 3 L 0 L 1 L
17 2-7 L 1 L
18 ( I = I r, X )3 r = r ( I θ CF ) 4 IrX CFCF ICF LICF0L r r r r ICF financing hierarchy r 12
19 ISLM Bernanke and Blinder1988 Bernanke and Gertler1995 I = I ( L, A, q ) 5 L = L( ρ, D ) 6 ILAq q id r Stiglitz and Weiss1981 i D MM q A Diamond
20 L D
21 2 I = I ( L, A, q ) 7 ( L = L I θ CF, ρ, BANK, Y 8 ILAq qcf CF ibanky ICF 8 ) 15
22 MM A L L BANK Stiglitz and Weiss
23 I K t t 1 = α q 1 t + α 2 A K t 1 t 1 + α 3 L K t t 1 + η + u i t 9 K t iti t it q t ita t it L t it i u t 9qq A/K 11 3 L/K i A t-1 /K t-1 it 17
24 L t I t LAND = β 1 + K t 1 K t 1 K t 1 + β BOND + β BIS 4 t 5 r t CF t + β 2 DEBT K t 1 + µ + v t 1 i t t 1 + β 3 LAND K t 1 n t 1 10 r LAND i t CF i t i, t i, t n DEBT i, t i t LAND i t i, t BONDtt 10 BIS i, t i µ v i, t i 1 I/K+LAND r /KCF/K IK CF 2 DEBT 2 12 DEBT DEBT LAND n /K 12 DEBT 13 2 DEBT DEBT 18
25 90 4 BOND 90 BOND 14 BOND 5 BIS I/K L/K 3.3 9L/K
26 X + u it = α1yit + α 2Z it + α 3i Y + v it = β1 X it + β 2Wit + β 3i it it X it Y it Z it W it 3i 3i 11 12X it 1113 Y it α 2β1 = Z 1 α β 1 it 1 + v 1 α β it β 2 + W 1 α β 1 1 it β1 + α 1 α β 1 1 3i 1 + β 1 α β 1 1 3i β1 + u 1 α β 1 1 it
27 13 3i Y it Y it u it 11 K 910 GMM 16 GMM 16 GMM GMM 21
28 , survival bias
29 ,813 1, q q 2003 q t 1 E β t+ j 1 j= 0 = I t t t+ j Pt j ( δ ) π 14 j = 1 ( 1 + ), 1 β t r β + j t+ i t i= 1 [] I E t t p t t δt t t t r t 23
30 q 14qr q q t 1 = I P t 1 δ t + rt j= 0 1 j E t ( π ) t+ j π t 1 + rt = 15 I P rt + δ t t BISBIS BISBIS 45 BIS r t π t
31 (%) BIS 23 BISBISBIS BIS BISBIS BIS BIS 8 4 Woo1999Ito and Sasaki
32 BIS BIS BIS BIS BIS BIS 25 BIS BIS BIS BIS 8 4 BIS BIS BIS 16 BIS = BIS Woo1999BIS Ito and Sasaki
33 (%) 4-2BISBIS BIS BIS BIS BIS BIS BIS BIS 8 27
34 4.3 I/K -1 qa -1 /K -1 L/K -1 LAND r /K -1 CF/K -1 DEBT q 2 L/K -1 I/K -1 I/K -1 qa -1 /K -1 LAND n /K -1 CF/K -1 DEBT qi/k -1 L/K LAND n /K q 2 I/K
35 I/K -1 q A -1 /K -1 L/K -1 LAND r /K -1 CF/K -1 DEBT -1 LAND n -1 /K I/K -1 q A -1 /K -1 L/K -1 LAND r K -1 CF/K -1 DEBT -1 LAND n -1 K -1 BOND
36 GMM I K t t 1 = α q 1 t + α 2 A K t 1 t 1 + α 3 L K t t 1 + η + u i t 9 K i, t i t I t i t q i, t i t A i, t i t L i, t i t η u i, t L t I t LAND = β 1 + K t 1 K t 1 K t 1 + β BOND + β BIS 4 t 5 r t t 1 i i CF t + β 2DEBT K t 1 + µ + v t t 1 + β 3 LAND K t 1 n t 1 10 r LAND i t CF i t i, t i, t n DEBT i, t i t LAND i t i, t BONDtt 10 BIS i, t i µ v i, t i
37 4-3 q BIS DI q BOND BISabcd 4 BIScd
38 bd 4 5 c cd
39
40 5-1 a b c d N=18, N=19,066 N=16,288 α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=8, N=8,358 N=7,246 α *** β *** *** *** *** α ** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β *** *** β J(p) J(p) N=10, N=10,689 N=8,988 α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β *** ** β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=5, N=5,358 N=4,525 α *** β α *** β *** *** *** *** α ** β β *** ** β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=5, N=5,284 N=4,416 α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β β J(p) J(p) t * 10** 5*** 1t White N I/KqROA1 CF/KA/KDEBT LAND n /KLAND r /K qcf/k1 DEBTA/KLAND n /K BISBONDLAND r /K 34
41 5-2 a b c d N=12, N=12,027 N=10,333 α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β β ** ** J(p) J(p) N=5, N=5,454 N=4,745 α *** β *** ** ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β β * * J(p) J(p) N=6, N=6,564 N=5,558 α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β * β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=3, N=3,320 N=2,814 α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** ** ** α *** β ** ** β ** β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=3, N=3,220 N=2,721 α *** β ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β β J(p) J(p) I/KqROA1 CF/KA/KDEBT LAND r /K 2 q qcf/k1 DEBTA/KLAND n /K BISBONDLAND r /K 35
42 5-3 a b c d N=6, N=6,657 N=5,595 α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β β J(p) J(p) N=2, N=2,723 N=2,326 α ** β *** ** ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β ** ** * β * β J(p) J(p) N=3, N=3,924 N=3,247 α ** β ** *** ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β * * β * β J(p) J(p) N=1, N=1,935 N=1,617 α ** β α *** β *** *** *** *** α β β ** β J(p) J(p) N=1, N=1,965 N=1,606 α ** β *** *** ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β * * * β β J(p) J(p) I/KqROA1 CF/KA/K DEBTLAND n /KLAND r /K L/KqCF/K1 DEBTA/K LAND n /KBISBONDLAND r /K 3. 36
43 I/K LAND r /KCF/K
44 L CP CP
45 5-4 a b c d N=15, N=15,234 N=13,226 α *** β ** ** ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β β ** ** J(p) J(p) N=6, N=6,547 N=5,771 α *** β * * ** ** α ** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β β J(p) J(p) ) N=8, N=8,681 N=7,421 α ** β ** ** ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β *** *** β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=4, N=4,338 N=3,714 α ** β ) α *** β *** ) *** *** *** α ** β β *** ** β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=4, N=4,312 N=3,674 α ** β *** *** ** ** α *** β *** ) *** *** *** α *** β β β J(p) J(p)
46 5-5 a b c d N=9, N=9,564 N=8,365 α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β β ** ** J(p) J(p) N=4, N=4,261 N=3,768 α *** β ** ** * * α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β ) β ** ** J(p) J(p) N=5, N=5,303 N=4,580 α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β *** * β *** *** J(p) J(p) ) N=3, N=2,669 N=2,299 α ** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** α β β *** β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=2, N=2,619 N=2,265 α ** β ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β * * β ** * β * ** J(p) J(p)
47 5-6 a b c d N=5, N=5,360 N=4,571 α *** β * α *** β *** ) *** *** *** α *** β β β J(p) J(p) N=2, N=2,143 N=1,866 α *** β ** ) * α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β * ** * β β J(p) J(p) N=3, N=3,211 N=2,690 α ** β ** ** ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β ) β ) β J(p) J(p) N=1, N=1,582 N=1,337 α * β * * α *** β *** *** *** *** α ** β * * β ) β J(p) J(p) N=1, N=1,611 N=1,335 α ** β ** ** ** ** α ** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β ) β J(p) J(p)
48 5-7 1CD a b c d N=1, N=1,189 N=1,072 α *** β α β *** *** *** *** α β β * β J(p) J(p) N= N=686 N=623 α *** β α ** β α β β ** ** β J(p) J(p) N= N=502 N=449 α β ** ** α β *** *** *** *** α ** β β ** * β J(p) J(p) CD a b c d N=9, N=9,479 N=7,911 α *** β ** ** ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β *** *** β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=4, N=4,672 N=3,900 α *** β α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β *** *** β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=4, N=4,781 N=3,967 α ** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β β J(p) J(p)
49 5-8 1CD a b c d N= N=703 N=650 α β ** ** α β ** * * * α * β β β J(p) J(p) N= N=418 N=387 α β ** ** ** ** α β α β β β J(p) J(p) N= N=285 N=263 α β α β α β ** *** * ** β β J(p) J(p) CD a b c d N=5, N=5,859 N=4,907 α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β *** β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=2, N=2,902 N=2,427 α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** ** * α *** β ** ** β *** β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=2, N=2,935 N=2,458 α *** β * * α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β * * β ** β * ** J(p) J(p)
50 5-9 1CD a b c d N= N=431 N=371 α * β α * β *** *** *** *** α β β β J(p) J(p) N= N=232 N=201 α β α β * α β β ** ** β J(p) J(p) N= N=198 N=170 α β ** ** ** ** α ** β *** *** *** *** α β β β *** * J(p) J(p) CD a b c d N=3, N=3,491 N=2,871 α ** β ** *** ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β ** ** * ** β ** ** β J(p) J(p) N=1, N=1,703 N=1,414 α ** β α *** β *** *** *** *** α β β *** ** β * J(p) J(p) N=1, N=1,766 N=1,436 α * β *** *** ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β * * * β β J(p) J(p)
51 5-10 a b c d N=18, N=19,059 N=16,281 α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β β J(p) J(p) N=8, N=8,360 N=7,248 α ** β *** *** *** *** α ** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β ** *** β * *** J(p) J(p) N=10, N=10,674 N=8,973 α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β *** *** β J(p) J(p) N=5, N=5,345 N=4,512 α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α ** β β *** *** β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=5, N=5,284 N=4,416 α β ** ** ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β β J(p) J(p) I/KqROA1 CF/KA/K DEBTLAND n /KLAND r /K qcf/k1 DEBTA/KLAND n /K BISBONDLAND r /K 45
52 5-11 a b c d N=12, N=12,029 N=10,334 α *** β *** *** ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β β J(p) J(p) N=5, N=5,456 N=4,746 α *** β ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β ** ** β ** *** J(p) J(p) N=6, N=6,562 N=5,556 α *** β *** *** ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β *** *** β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=3, N=3,321 N=2,812 α *** β ** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α ** β β *** *** β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=3, N=3,222 N=2,723 α ** β α ** β *** *** *** *** α ** β β β J(p) J(p) I/KqROA1 CF/KA/KDEBT LAND r /K 2 q qcf/k1 DEBTA/KLAND n /K BISBONDLAND r /K 46
53 5-12 a b c d N=6, N=6,704 N=5,642 α ** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β β J(p) J(p) N=2, N=2,723 N=2,360 α β *** *** ** ** α * β *** *** *** *** α *** β * ** β * * β J(p) J(p) N=3, N=3,924 N=3,256 α β ** *** ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β β *** *** β J(p) J(p) N=1, N=1,934 N=1,616 α * β α *** β *** *** ** ** α β β *** *** β ** * J(p) J(p) N=1, N=1,965 N=1,617 α β ** ** * * α *** β *** *** ** ** α *** β β β J(p) J(p) I/KqROA1 CF/KA/KDEBT LAND n /KLAND r /K qcf/k1 DEBTA/KLAND n /K BISBONDLAND r /K 3. 47
54 ROA cd 1 ROA 1 ROA ROA 48
55 ROA 1 ROA 1 49
56 5-13 a b c d N=2, N=2,679 N=2,262 α *** β ** ** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α ** β β * β J(p) J(p) N=2, N=2,678 N=2,262 α β α *** β *** *** *** *** α β β ** β *** *** J(p) J(p) a b c d N=1, N=1,658 N=1,406 α β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** *** *** α * β β * β ** ** J(p) J(p) N=1, N=1,662 N=1,408 α *** β ** * α *** β *** * α *** β ** ** β * β ** ** J(p) J(p) a b c d N= N=968 N=809 α ** β * * ** ** α *** β *** *** *** *** α * β β * β J(p) J(p) N= N=967 N=807 α β α ** β *** *** *** *** α β β β J(p) J(p)
57 R O A R O A 5-16 ROA a b c d N=2, N=2,678 N=2,262 α * β ** ** ** ** α * β *** *** *** *** α ** β β * β *** *** J(p) J(p) N=2, N=2,679 N=2,262 α *** β α *** β *** *** *** *** α β β ** β * * J(p) J(p) R O A R O A 5-17 ROA a b c d N=1, N=1,661 N=1,407 α *** β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** α ** β β ** β ** J(p) J(p) N=1, N=1,660 N=1,407 α *** β α β *** *** *** *** α *** β *** *** ** ** β β ** ** J(p) J(p) R O A R O A 5-18 ROA a b c d N= N=967 N=809 α β α *** β *** ** ** * α * β β * β J(p) J(p) N= N=968 N=808 α ** β α *** β *** *** *** *** α β β * β J(p) J(p)
58 q
59
60 7 7.1 Hayashi and Inoue Perpetual Inventory Method 6 K t = ( 1 δ ) K t 1 + I t 17 K i, t i t I t i t δ Hayashi and Inoue
61 Hayashi and Inoue Hayashi and Inoue1990Hulten and Wykoff1979, q q t δ t π t t t-1 r 7.7 I p t
62 i t t1 r t 1 i t1 ri, t 1 r t 1 r i, t 1 t r t t i
63 ROA 57
64 1991 Vol.11(4) 2003 pp pp pp pp Working Paper Series, No Working Paper Series, 05-J pp pp Discussion Papers in Economics, No Vol.25(4) 2001pp
65 1999 Keio Economic Society Discussion Paper Series, No.9901Keio University Bernanke, Ben S. and Alan Blinder1988, Credit, Money, and Aggregate Demand, The American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol.78, No.2(May), pp Bernanke, Ben S. and Mark Gertler1995, Inside the Black Box: The Credit Channel of Monetary Policy Transmission, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol.9, No.4(Fall), pp Caballero, Ricardo J, Takeo Hoshi and Anil Kashyap2006, Zombie Lending and Depressed Restructuring in Japan, mimeo. Diamond, Douglas1984, Financial Intermediation and Delegated Monitoring. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol.51, No.3(July), pp Fazzar Steven M., R. Glenn Hubbard and Bruce C. Petersen1988, Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment Brookings Papers on Economic Activity No.1, pp Gibson, Michael S.1995, Can Bank Health Affect Investment? Evidence from Japan. The Journal of Business, Vol.68, No.3(July), pp Gibson, Michael S.1997, More Evidence on the Link between Bank Health and Investment in Japan. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Vol.11, No.3 (Sep.), pp Hayash Fumio and Tohru Inoue1991 The Relation Between Firm Growth and Q with Multiple Capital Goods: Theory and Evidence from Panel Data on Japanese Firms, Econometrica, Vol.59, No.3 (May), pp Hosh Takeo, Anil Kashyap and David Scharfstein1991, Corporate Structure, Liquidity, and Investment: Evidence from Japanese Industrial Groups. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.106, Issue1 (Feb.), pp Hultten, Charles R. and Frank C. Wykoff1979 Economic Depreciation of the U.S. Capital Stock: A First Step, Report submitted to the U.S. Treasury Department Office of Tax Analysis, Washington, D.C. Hultten, Charles R. and Frank C. Wykoff1981 The Measurement of Economics Depreciation, Depreciation, Inflation and the Taxation of Income from Capital, Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press. Ito, Takatoshi and Yuri Sasak N.2002, Impacts of the Basle Capital Standard on Japanese Banks' Behavior. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Vol.16, No.3 (Sep.), 59
66 pp Kaplan, Steven N. and Luigi Zingales1997, Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.112, Issue1 (Feb.), pp Motonish Taizo and Hiroshi Yoshikawa1999, Causes of the Long Stagnation of Japan during the 1990s:Financial or Real. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Vol.13, No.3 (Sep.), pp Ogawa, Kazuo and Kazuyuki Suzuki1998, Land Value and Corporate Investment: Evidence from Japanese Panel Data. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Vol.12, No.3 (Sep.), pp Ogawa, Kazuo and Kazuyuki Suzuki2000, Demand for Bank Loans and Investment under Borrowing Constraints: A Panel Study of Japanese Firm Data. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Vol.14, No.1 (March), pp Sekine, Toshitaka1999, Firm Investment and Balance-Sheet Problems in Japan IMF Working Papers, No.111, International Monetary Fund. Stiglitz, Joseph E. and Andrew Weiss1981, Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information. The American Economic Review, Vol.71, No.3 (June), pp Tsuru, Kotaro2001, The Choice of Lending Patterns by Japanese Banks during the 1980s and 1990s: The Causes and Consequences of a Real Estate Lending Boom. IMES Discussion Paper Series, No.2001-E-8, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan. Woo, David1999, In Search of Capital Crunch : Supply Factors Behind the Credit Slowdown in Japan. IMF Working Papers, WP/99/3, International Monetary Fund. 60
[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2
![[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2](/thumbs/91/105001680.jpg "[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2")
2002 4 1 1990 1 525-8577 1-1-1. Tel.: 077-561-4855. Fax.: 077-561-3964. E-mail: khori@ec.ritsumei.ac.jp 1 [17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2 MM MM MM MM CP 0 3 1 1990 1970 2 2 1 1 17%
株式分割払込制度と企業金融、設備投資の関係について ─1930年代初において株式追加払込が果たした役割を中心に─
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2007-J-20 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 30 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2007-J-20 2007
, 3, 1999, 4,,
1, 1992 2005,,, 10 2,, 1992 1998 1,,, 1998 2002 2,, 3,,, 2002, 2002 3 1 2 1 , 3, 1999, 4,, 3 14 11 2 I, 10,, 1992 2005, 2,, 3, 4,, II,, 1992 1998 1,, 1998 2002 2 2002 3 II-1: 1 1993 1998 90,, 1995 6850,,
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 99-J-17 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 100-8630 203 IMES Discussion Paper Series 99-J-17 1999 6 * JEL classification E52 E58
<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>
615 379 1 1995 10 OECD 1995 380 616 57 3 1993 4 3071 2003 1 3247 10 10 4 1 1990 2000 2003 10 617 381 2002 2 3 4 5 2 1 1990 1995 1995 12 1995 IPP Independent Power Producer 1 2004a, b 2005a, b 382 618 57
第一次大戦後の日本における国債流通市場の制度改革
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2009-J-23 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 2-1-1 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2009-J-23 2009
........,.,.,..,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,., International Capital Market Litan et al a b c d M&A a a b E- e- Litan et al. : Table Levine World Bank Levine Greenwald et al. B R F R r R R r B R r B R r B R R Stiglitz
わが国銀行業の将来像― 預金通貨需要からのアプローチによるマクロ的サイズの検討―
M1GDP M2M1 M1GDP M2M1 E-mail: kazuhiko.ishida@boj.or.jp E-mail: hitoshi.mio@boj.or.jp M2GDP Modigliani-Miller: MM Hoshi and Kashyap HKHK HK Quarterly Financial Report for Manufacturing, Mining and Trade
p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2
2013 1 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 2013 4 11 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem : Jordan : 1 investment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 *1 *1 93SNA 1 p.180 1936 100 1970 *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian
戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成：最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務
1930 Modigliani and Miller [1958] 170 1930 2008 7 16 I E-mail: takashi.nanjou@boj.or.jp E-mail: cc00881@srv.cc.hit-u.ac.jp //2009.7 81 1. 1 2 M&A 3 4 1965 1969 1995 1995 1993 1 2008 2008 1985 2006 10 ROA
1990年代以降の日本の経済変動
1990 * kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp ** hitoshi.sasaki@boj.or.jp *** masahiro.higo@boj.or.jp No.05-J-10 2005 12 103-8660 30 * ** *** 1990 2005 12 1990 1990 1990 2005 11 2425 BIS E-mail: kenichi.sakura@boj.or.jp
デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程
1991 2003 GDP....................................... http://www.stat.go.jp/ http://www.boj.or.jp/ GDP http://www.esri.cao.go.jp/ GDP - - - inflation targeting Krugman a IS-LM liquidity trap Krugman b Krugman
Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C
27 nabe@ier.hit-u.ac.jp 27 4 3 Jorgenson Tobin q : Hayashi s Theorem Jordan Saddle Path. GDP % GDP 2. 3. 4.. Tobin q 2 2. Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F
わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題
* takeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** kawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp *** naohiko.baba@boj.or.jp No.05-J-3 2005 3 103-8660 30 No.05-J-3 2005 3 1990 * E-mailtakeshi.shimatani@boj.or.jp ** E-mailkawai@ml.me.titech.ac.jp
ＧＤＰギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
Y-...W
259 21 1 1 2003 2 1 2 1 15 22 260 56 3 2 2. 1 2. 2 2. 3 2. 4 3 3. 1 3. 2 4 2 2. 1 1965 1999 2 Brick, Frierman, and Kim 1998 Choate 1997Fischer, Heinkel, and Zechner 1989 Gilson 1997 Mauer and Triantis
46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦
463420101 1. 1989, Yoshida and Rasche1990, Rasche1990, 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan1996, 1996, Sekine1998, 2001, Fujiki2002, 2003, 2004 Bahmani-Oskooee and Shabsigh1996, Amano and Wirjanto2000, Bahmani-Oskooee
開発金融増刊号
4 6 Y = f (, E, Y E ( Y E = α ( E α we py α 0 β E ( ( E β ( E β 6 ( = ( α β ( E β 8 i Y i f i, E i, i 9 Y = α α ( α E α S E 0 ( β β E β E( β E β β6 ( we Y = = = α β E py E β ( β Y Y B Y A r / pr p Y
untitled
2 book conference 1990 2003 14 Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 M1,M2 M1 Sekine(1998) Repeated Cross-Section Data 1 1. (1989), Yoshida and Rasche(1990), Rasche(1990), 19921997, Fujiki and Mulligan(1996),
( ) z W n u K P N P = (1 + z)wn N = nuk (1) (2) I/K u e f r l (= L/PK) (4) I K = g(u, r, e f, l ) g u > 0, g r < 0, g e f > 0,
1 money view credit view IS-LM Sims[1980] Bernanke[1983] 1930 Bernanke and Blinder[1988] IS-LM (credit channel) (1) 3 4 (2) 2 1 3 4 5 2 2.1 2.1.1 ( ) z W n u K P N P = (1 + z)wn N = nuk (1) (2) 2.1.2 I/K
1 1 1 [2000]
![1 1 1 [2000]](/thumbs/88/114894310.jpg "1 1 1 [2000]")
* 2000 7 26 1 1 1 [2000] 1 2 1 2 2 1 B to C 250000 億円 200000 日本米国 213,200 150000 100000 50000 0 153,600 106,900 71,100 66,620 42,700 43,860 22,500 26,940 15,340 645 3,360 7,730 1998 年 1999 年 2000 年 2001
RIETI Highlight VOL.25
RIETI Highlight 2009 SUMMER 25 VOL. Research Digest RIETI 2009 SUMMER VOL. 25 Highlight 1 2 3 5 8 10 12 13 14 19 ResearchDigest 20 24 28 32 36 38 40 41 42 44 45 RIETI Topics 01 CONTENTS 02 RIETI Highlight
会社法制上の資本制度の変容と企業会計上の資本概念について
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2006-J-1 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 30 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2006-J-1 2006 1
DGE DGE 2 2 1 1990 1 1 3 (1) ( 1
早 稲 田 大 学 現 代 政 治 経 済 研 究 所 ゼロ 金 利 下 で 量 的 緩 和 政 策 は 有 効 か? -ニューケインジアンDGEモデルによる 信 用 創 造 の 罠 の 分 析 - 井 上 智 洋 品 川 俊 介 都 築 栄 司 上 浦 基 No.J1403 Working Paper Series Institute for Research in Contemporary Political
headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s
CJEB The financial strategies of Japanese multinational enterprises and internal capital market, Columbia Business School, CJEB, Working Paper No., April,. headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart
論文０８.indd
* 1 はじめに,, TOPIX TOPIX, TOPIX TOPIX Shelor Anderson and Cross C Japan Society of Monetary Economics 図 1 東日本大震災前後の株価 (TOPIX) の推移 1,000 950 900 850 800 750 700 図 2 阪神大震災前後の株価 (TOPIX) の推移 1,650 1,550 1,450
物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法：わが国CPIからの教訓
CPICPI CPI CPI CPI CPI Economic Perspective Shiratsukaa Consumer Price IndexCPI CPI CPI CPI CPI Advisory Commission to Study the Consumer Price Index 1996Shiratsuka 1999bHoffmann 1998Cunningham 1996 Crawford
取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について－阪和銀行破綻の事例分析－
2 JEL Classification: G21, G14 Key words: e-mail y-murakami@aria.ocn.ne.jp 1 The Effect of Bank Failure on Client Firms A Study on the Hanwa Bank s Failure By Yoshiko Murakami Abstract The financial theories
ボーナス制度と家計貯蓄率－サーベイ・データによる再検証－
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No.139 by May 2005 Economic and Social Research Instute Cabinet Office Tokyo, Japan * 400 : JEL classification: D12, E21 * 186-8603 2-1 042-580-8369 FAX 042-580-8333 1 Abstract
ミクロ・データによる家計行動分析： 将来不安と予備的貯蓄
subjective measures E-mailkeiko.murata@mfs.cao.go.jp subjective subjective measures Dardanoni Leland waiting option Browning and LusardiEngen and Gruber Carroll and Samwick PSIDPanel Study of Income Dynamics
表紙＿目次.PDF
JIL 2 1980 vol.3 15 3 1 3 15 18 IT 26 28 33 20 OECD 80 90 (1998) (2000) 2 Aghion et al. (1999) OECD 1970 1 2 70 1980 90 1.1 Kuznets U inverted U-shaped hypothesis GNP U 1 18901940 6 3 Kuznets(1955) (1963)
Keynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits
43 2000 17 28 Masahiro NAKANO 2.1 Keynes 2.2 3.1 3.2 43 2000 Keynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits Keynes IS LM 1990 Keynes 1980 90 2 1 43 2000 Keynes
untitled
2007 2 * (i) (ii) 2006 7 1999 2 2000 8 1 (2003) Oda and Ueda (2005) 2005 Kimura and Small(2006) Iwamura, Shiratsuka and Watanabe (2006) (2006) 3 (i) (ii) (iii) 2 2 3 4 2.1 (2003) (2005) 1) (i) (ii) (i)
untitled
Discussion Paper Series No. J98 2008 9 2008 9 1919 1 1938 12 1928 1 1936 4 1 10 1931 1932 2008 19530274 1. 2 1930 5 1 1931 6 12 1936 11 2 1 1919 1 1938 12 1963 1927 1 1936 4 1 2 3 4 7 10 1927 1 1936 4
国際流動性に関する財政的側面について
IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: obstfeld@econ.berkeley.edu / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]
アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて
* ** 199 1 1996-97 relation * ** Seoul conference China and Emerging Asia: Reorganizing the Global Economy? held by KIEP and Seoul National University 26 5 11-12 Hugh Patrick Yung-Chul Park 26 9 9-1 East
,.,,.,. NIRA,.,.,,, GDP.,., 1%, 2.0% 3).,,.,,., 1, 4).,,.,, GDP,.,,.,,,.,,., 2002.,,., 3), Q&A Q16 (http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kakei/qa-1.ht
1, 1, 2011 4 3-28,,.,,.,.,,.,,.,,.,.,. 1., 1), 1946.,, GDP,.,,,.,,., (2008) ( NIRA ), 23,.,,, 2).,,,.,,.,,., 657-8501 2-1, E-mail: unayama@person.kobe-u.ac.jp 1) 1. 2), 1990 2 21, 1993 6 12. 3 1 1 2011
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right
Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): 54-76 Issue Date 1996-07 URL https://doi.org/10.14989/45083 Right Type Departmental Bulletin Paper Textversion publisher
季刊 企業と法創造 第1巻第4号（通巻第4号）
Aoki and Patrick Hoshi and Kashyap ROE 125 ROA Aoki Odagiri Frankl Fruin 126 NEEDS ROE ROA ROE ROEROA ROE ROEIQ ROE ROE ROE 127 128 IQ ROE ROE ROE ROE ROA ROE 129 Miyajima 130 Okazaki Teranishi GHQ % Prowse,
Powered by TCPDF ( Title 金利現実化措置以後の韓国における企業金融 : 年 Sub Title Korean corporate finance between 1965 and 1971 Author 李, 明輝 (Lee,
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Title 金利現実化措置以後の韓国における企業金融 : 1965 1971 年 Sub Title Korean corporate finance between 1965 and 1971 Author 李, 明輝 (Lee, Myunghwi) Publisher 慶應義塾経済学会 Publication year 2016
-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs
BIS FRB BIS BIS FRB QE QE -February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs GDP GDP........ GDP BIS, 83rd Annual Report, June 2013, p.14 Ibid., p.14. -February 1 1 2009 2013 2) 2009 2013 2) -7.6-4.0
Title Author(s) Kobe University Repository : Kernel 流 動 性 危 機 : レパレッジとモニタリング (< 特 集 > 世 界 金 融 危 機 )(Liquidity Crisis : Leverage and Monitoring ( World Financial Crisis)) 丸 茂, 俊 彦 Citation 国 民 経 済 雑 誌,203(1):107-119
小塚匡文.indd
流通科学大学論集 - 経済 情報 政策編 - 第 22 巻第 2 号,19-32(2014) Lending Behavior for Small-Medium Business by Shinkin Bank and Other Domestic Bank in Japan: Evidences from Time Series Data Masafumi Kozuka I. 2006 99.7
12056286_03.indd
: 82 1 2013 7 2010 2011 1 30 2010 30 2011 30 2010 9 10 11 2011 1 2 1 2010 9 UK UK UK UK UK p. 843 45 82 1 1 UK 9 9 2007-08 UK 30% 30 20%30 150 30 32.5% 2030% p. 843 3 2004-05 5% 5% 75% p. 843 2010 11 1963
財政赤字の経済分析：中長期的視点からの考察
1998 1999 1998 1999 10 10 1999 30 (1982, 1996) (1997) (1977) (1990) (1996) (1997) (1996) Ihori, Doi, and Kondo (1999) (1982) (1984) (1987) (1993) (1997) (1998) CAPM 1980 (time inconsistency) Persson, Persson
M&A の経済分析：M&A はなぜ増加したのか
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-J-034 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-J-034 M&A の経済分析 :M&A はなぜ増加したのか 蟻川靖浩 宮島英昭 ( 早稲田大学 RIETI) 2006 年 4 月 要旨 1990 年代以降の M&A の急増の主要な要因は 産業や企業の成長性や収益性へのショックである とりわけ M&A を活発に行っている産業あるいは企業の特性としては
本邦株式市場の流動性に関する動学的考察―東京証券取引所のティック・データ分析―
tightnessdepth resiliency BIS Market Liquidity: Research Findings and Selected Policy Implications BISWorld Wide Web http://www.bis.org E-mail: jun.muranaga@boj.or.jp Muranaga and Shimizu O Hara Muranaga
濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G
濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G34 950-2181 2 8050 Tel. and fax: 025-262-6538 E-mail: khamada@econ.niigata-u.ac.jp
D F I CP (equity finance) CP (debt finance) ( )
1990 2001 2 26 1 1990 1990 1 1992 4 D F I 50 3 26000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 CP (equity finance) CP (debt finance) 1960 1995 ( ) 1970 60 2 1970 1990 85 CP (disintermediation) 1995-1998 BIS Hoshi et al (1991) 1990
OECD INVEST JAPAN jp/ij/index.htm
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) Title OECD 諸国における経営資源の収益率の推計 Sub Title Rates of return on managerial resources : the case of OECD countries Author 遠藤, 正寛 (Endoh, Masahiro) Publisher 慶應義塾大学出版会 Publication
BB 報告書完成版_修正版）040415.doc
3 4 5 8 KW Q = AK α W β q = a + α k + βw q = log Q, k = log K, w = logw i P ij v ij P ij = exp( vij ), J exp( v ) k= 1 ik v i j = X β αp + γnu j j j j X j j p j j NU j j NU j (
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2000-J-10 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8630 30 IMES Discussion Paper Series 2000-J-10 2000 4 * ** *** 99 2 * E-Mail:
伝統的な経済学では、「消費は重要ではあるが、気にしなくてもよい」と考えられてきた
2005 1 2004 SARS 2003 IMF 2004 5.0 2004 4.1 0.9 30 2005 2004 2005 2005 2005 2004 2005 IMF 2005 4.3 2004 IMF 2004 2003 3.0 4.3 2003 2 2003 2004 IT 2005 IMF 2005 2004 3.5 IT 1995 10 2.8% 10 2 1 IT IT 2004
... PC................................................... keio.jp... Web... Web........................ AV....................................................................................... 1 .....
公的機関が関与した企業再生支援
14 56 2004.10 corporate control right debt overhang 4, 1998, p.253., p.263., 2000, p.44. 2004.10 57 DES DDS DES DDS 10 11 Hold out, 2000, pp.215-226, p.44. N 1265, 2004.4.1, pp.25-26. Coase theorem Ronald
2
1 2 3 2003 3 2002 10 2000 4 1 (Y/L)/ (Y/L)= NonIT (K NonIT/L)/ (K NonIT/L)+ IT (K IT/L)/ (K IT/L) TFP/TFP Y:, L:, K NonIT: IT, K IT: IT NonIT, IT 2 TFP 5 6 i ii iii iv 1 2 3 2003 3 2002 10 2000 4 1 (Y/L)/
資産価格バブルと金融政策：1980年代後半の日本の経験とその教訓
foreward-looking E-mail: kunio.okina@boj.or.jp E-mail: masaaki.shirakawa@boj.or.jp E-mail: shigenori.shiratsuka@boj.or.jp Cargill, Hutchison, and Ito GDP GDP GDP Morgan Stanley Capital Internationalhttp://www.msci.com
商学 ６３‐３☆／６．山本
193 W. A. 1 2 3 1 2 WTO FTA TPP D. P. P. W. A. 194 2 3 Lewis 1954 1982, 1987 1999 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 A B 1987 119 1985 Krugman and Obstfeld 2009 19742006 3 W. A. 195 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 A a1 a2 * * i ai i 1, 2
untitled
* 2001 (B) ** 113-0033 7-3-1 TEL(03)5841-5641FAX(03)5841-5521iwamoto@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp 1990 1990 1 2 3 1 (2002) 2 social infrastructure social capital Woolcook (1998) 3-1 - - 2 - 1990 Mera (1973) G Cobb-Douglas
非上場企業におけるコーポレート・ガバナンス
* sfukuda@e.u-tokyo.ac.jp ** munehisa.kasuya@boj.or.jp *** No. 06-J-05 2006 3 103-8660 30 * ** *** 1 10 TFP 1 1 La Porta, Lopez-De-Silanes, and Shleifer (1999) OECD27 20 20 10 2 1 Lichtenberg and Pushner
産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf
2003 11 10 IT IT JIP JCER ) 2003 CD-ROM http://www.esri.go.jp/jp/archive/bun/bun170/170index. html 1 JIP Jorgenson, Mun, andstiroh (2002) GDP 2 3 1951 1954 1957 1960 1963 1966 1969 1972 1975 1978 1981
公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ
OECD CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI CPI / GDP / / / /.............................. Transparency International Corruption Perception Index CPI CPI 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
ビールと発泡酒の税率と経済厚生
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 12-J-019 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 12-J-019 2012 年 6 月 ビールと 発 泡 酒 の 税 率 と 経 済 厚 生 * 慶 田 昌 之 ( 立 正 大 学 ) 要 旨 本 稿 では, 近 年 ビール 系 飲 料 として 販 売 されている 発 泡 酒 の 登 場 によって 発 生 している
中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 2012 年 3 月 審査論文 1 Keywords: JEL Classi cation: L13, L22, L33 1 * *1 Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (2009) Mukherjee and Suestrong
中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 22 年 3 月 審査論文 Keywords: JEL Classication: L3, L22, L33 * 2373253 * Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (29)Mukherjee and Suestrong (29) Long and Stähler (29)Gil-Molto, Poyago-Theotoky, and Zikos (2)Matsumura
OSIPP40_p1_2.eps
2006 年 秋号 No.40 1 2 Asia-Pacific Financial Markets Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies Studies on a Second Generation of Disequilibrium Economics International Economic Integration and
野村資本市場研究所｜ベイルインの導入に向けた検討－破綻時に債権の損失吸収を図る新たな措置－（PDF）
1. SIFI 2. EU 1 FDIC G20 FSB 3. 4. FSB 2012 8 G20 88 2012 6 EU EU bail-in 1 ICB 2 write-down SIFI SIFI SIFI bail-out SIFI G20 too big to fail 2010 6 G20 SIFI 1 3 2011 11 FSBG20 1 2 3 2012 ICB PLAC 2011
Winter 図 1 図 OECD OECD OECD OECD 2003
266 Vol. 44 No. 3 I 序論 Mirrlees 1971 Diamond 1998 Saez 2002 Kaplow 2008 1 700 900 1, 300 1, 700 II III IV V II わが国の再分配の状況と国際比較 OECD Forster and Mira d Ercole 2005 2006 2001 Winter 08 267 図 1 図 2 2000 2
Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Mixed Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit
Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series No.248 東京圏における 1990 年代以降の住み替え行動 住宅需要実態調査 を用いた Logit 分析 小林庸平行武憲史 March 2008 Hitotsubashi University Research Unit for Statistical Analysis in Social Sciences A 21st-Century
橡motonishi.PDF
2000 3 ITME Discussion Paper No.26 850-8506 4-2-1 moto@net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp 1 1 MRF 1 (2000) 2 MRF 2 Schreft (1997) 3 2 Tobin (1985) Friedman (1992) 3 3 4 5 3 4 5 2 White (1984) 1 4 (1996) (1999) (1999)
Kobe University Repository : Kernel Title 世 界 金 融 危 機 の 東 アジア 新 興 国 経 済 への 影 響 Author(s) 金 京, 拓 司 Citation 国 民 経 済 雑 誌, 202(5): 61-70 Issue date 2010-11 Resource Type Departmental Bulletin Paper / 紀 要
untitled
The theory of investment, effective demand, and effective supply MURASE Naoyuki 2008 GDP 90 1970 80 Leijonhufvud, A.xel(1968) IS-LM IS-LM (1936) 3 N Z N proceeds; N D N (1936) 7 (1952) 1936 f(n) (N) N
JSPS Grants-in-Aid for Creative Scientific Research Understanding Inflation Dynamics of the Japanese Economy Working Paper Series No.7 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロ
Title 日本家計の消費 貯蓄 労働プロファイル Author(s) 阿部, 修人 ; 稲倉, 典子 Citation Issue 2007-02-14 Date Type Technical Report Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/10086/13627 Right Hitotsubashi University Repository
02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j
X-12-ARIMA Band-PassDECOMP HP X-12-ARIMADECOMP HPBeveridge and Nelson DECOMP X-12-ARIMA Band-PassHodrick and PrescottHP DECOMPBeveridge and Nelson M CD X ARIMA DECOMP HP Band-PassDECOMP Kiyotaki and Moore
【表紙】経済学論叢＿１８号／表１・３・背
Blanchard Solow Solow Galor and Tsiddon ,, , ,, ,,,,,, a if b c if if CES CES,,,,,,. Bowles Ciccone and Peri, .,, Bowles Hamermesh Antras Ciccone and Peri CES CES Krusell et al. Duffy et al. Hornstein
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Quarterly Journal of Economics Review of Economics and Statistics Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis Economics of Education Review Journal of Political
6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21
1) 1997 15 02 03 751 1998 8 9 04 1996 16.1% 17.5% 26.9% 64.9% 63.3% 48.9% 2) 02 54.8% 59.0% 61.8% 78.6% 46.5% 1996 17.8% 19.9% 18.7% 42% 11.9% 3) 4) 01 3 1 3 2 03 04 1 TCL 5) Vol. 52, No. 4, October 06
untitled
Trade and Trade Finance in the 200809 Financial Crisis, IMF Working Paper WP/11/16., Understanding the Great Trade Collapse of 200809 and the Subsequent Trade Recovery, Economic Perspectives, 2Q/2011.
高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―
196 2017 * ** ** ** ** 160 2 2 JEL Classification Codes E21, E22, J11 Keywords * ESRI 28 ESRI 29 3 17 ESRI ** 115 196 Population Aging and Domestic Investment An Analysis Using International Panel Data
金／金
IMF IMF M&A IMF IMF Gerchenkron Gerchenkron unbalanced growth Gerchenkron Johnson development state Hirschman IMF OECD IMF IMF GDP crony capitalism Krugman IMF capital market-based financial system bank-centered
2001 2001 1999 2001 2.1 2001 2002 124
123 133 2002 The Influence of Investing Securities and Retirement Allowance on Stock Market Valuation Yasuo HOSHINO, Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences, University of Tsukuba Kenji HAYASHI, Graduate
中国引き締め策の対外的影響
ito@nli-research.co.jp 2 2003 2004 9.8 47.8 10.7 84.3 3 1 1 4 5 9.6 9.8 47.8 28.6 84 60.2 30.2 7.5 SARS 15.4 338.83 11.9 726.97 42.7 SARS 10.7 12.8 ( ) 10.9 16.1 1997 6 8.7 11.9 20.7 21.6 16.2 17 7 15.3
デフレの定義（最新版）.PDF
DP/01-1 Director General for Economic Assessment and Policy Analysis CABINET OFFICE E-mail : naoki.okamoto@mfs.cao.go.jp 1 2 3 i (ii) 4 5 Deflation defined as at least two consecutive years of price decreases.
03.™ƒ−ÔŁñ“’
BIS BIS, Implications for Central Banks of the Development of Electronic Money, 1996. IC IC IC BC BA IC IC ATM ATM BIS POS IC IC ICICIC ECOM ECOM face-to-face IC Berger, A. N., D. Hancock, and J. C.
2 / 24
2017 11 9 1 / 24 2 / 24 Solow, 1957 total factor productivity; TFP 5% 経済成長率の要因分解 4% 3% 2.68% 2.51% 2% 1% 0% 1.63% 1.50% 0.34% 0.42% 0.55% 0.97% 1.14% 0.86% 0.13% -0.59% -0.59% -0.09% 0.01% -1% 1970-80
An Empirical Study of the Securities Firms' Dilemma on Financial Innovation through Diffusion of Internet Deals Yasugi Satoshi Bower, J. L., 1999, Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave,
IMES Discussion Paper Series 98-J
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discuss ssion Paper No. 98-J-1 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN IMES Discussion Paper Series 98-J-1 1998 1 E-mail: tokiko.shimizu@boj.or.jp 1. 1.1.
時間割引：双曲割引と弱加法性
Discussion aper No. 666 June 2006 The Institute of Social and Economic Research Osaka University 6-1 Mihogaoka, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan Time Discounting: Declining Impatience and Interval Effect
物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―
NAIRU NAIRU NAIRU GDPGDP NAIRUNon- Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment GDP GDP NAIRU Lown and RichFisher, Mahadeva and Whitley raw materials G NAIRUTurnerFai WatanabeNAIRU Watanabe nested NAIRU
Public Investment, the Rate of Return, and Optimal Fiscal Policy Economic Growth Pioneering Economic Theory Mathematical Theories of Economic Growth Review of Economic Studiesvol.27 Econometrica vol.34
% OFHEO Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight ODPM Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's INSEE (2004 ) PCEOECDE
GDP 7 OFHEO 2005 3 272.89 1980 100 12.0 5 55.3 3 2 1 1979 2004 2 6 2000 68 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 90 2.75 2005 3.4 8.0% 1 6.0% 4.0% 30.3 2.0% DC 20 0.0% OFHEOHouse Price Index 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
1970). Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C. and R. D. Willig (1982); Contestable Markets and The Theory of Industry Structure, 1982. Caves, R. and M. E. Porter (1977); From entry barriers to mobility barriers:
PFI
PFI 23 3 3 PFI PFI 1 1 2 3 2.1................................. 3 2.2..................... 4 2.3.......................... 5 3 7 3.1................................ 7 3.2.................................
日本初期貨幣研究史略 ─和同開珎と富本銭・無文銀銭の評価をめぐって─
IMES DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES Discussion Paper No. 2004-J-14 INSTITUTE FOR MONETARY AND ECONOMIC STUDIES BANK OF JAPAN 103-8660 30 http://www.imes.boj.or.jp IMES Discussion Paper Series 2004-J-14 2004
SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離－日本の貯蓄率低下の要因－
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 RIETI Discussion Paper Series 10-J-003 2009 年 12 月 SNA と家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離 - 日本の貯蓄率低下の要因 - 宇南山卓 ( 神戸大学大学院経済学研究科 ) 要 旨 SNA と家計調査から計算される家計貯蓄率の乖離の原因を明らかにし 日本の貯蓄率の低下の原因を考察した
日本における財政政策のインパクトー1990年代のイベント・スタディー
FTPL FTPL sustainability FTPL fiscal theory of the price level FTPL Fukuda and Teruyama Giavazzi and Pagan Giavazzi and Pagano Alesina and PerottiSutherlandPerottiGiavazzi, Jappelli and Pagano FTPL LeeperSimsWoodford
59-1･2 鳥居昭夫・春日教測 .pwd
logit JEL Classifications: D10, M30, L82 Wilbur 2008 Shishikura et al. 2018 and de Gracia 2012 Bayraktaroglu et al. 2018 Carare and Zentner 2012 Carare and Zentner 2012 Train et al. 1987 Hendel 1999 Spence
株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─
q E-mail: kenji.nishizaki@boj.or.jp E-mail: kurasawa@ynu.ac.jp OECD Vives Tirole Shleifer and Vishny q %% %% % % Allen and Gale %% % Admati, Pfreiderer and Zechner Burkart, Gromb and Panunzi Cremer 1995Pagno
Tomorrow Next th draft version MEW SWET
Research Center for Price Dynamics A Research Project Concerning Prices and Household Behaviors Based on Micro Transaction Data Working Paper Series No.7 Tomorrow Next を用いた金融政策の分析 青野幸平 June 14, 2012 4th
% 1% 37% 1 2
. 1. 2. 3. 3-1 3-2 3-3 3-4. 1. 2. 3. 4.. 1. 2. 3. 4.. 1. 2. 3.FORTRAN -1- 1 2002 2 2002-2- 2002 690 10% 1% 37% 1 2 20% -3- 1. 2. 3. 4. -4- 2002 1 24 1949 5 9 5 74% 50% -5- 1. 1 16 23 1 2001 25 1992 3 3