NR国際政治学会報告論文
|
|
|
- さなえ もてぎ
- 9 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 同 盟 の 変 革 と NATO=ロシア 関 係 の 現 在 : NATO 側 の 視 点 から 1. はじめに WTO WTO CFE NATO= 2. NATO=ロシア 関 係 のこれまで (1) 冷 戦 後 の NATO=ロシア 関 係 の 構 造 化 NATO NATO WTO NACC WTO NACC EAPC PFP NATO=EAPC/PFP NATO PJC NATO=NRC PJC 1997 NATO= 1 NRC 2004 NATO=: 2 PJC N+1NRC NRC NRC NRC NATO NATO NATO 1 NATO ( Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between the Russian Federation and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, signed in Paris, France, 27 May, 1997) 2 NATO-Russia Relations: New Quality, Declaration by Heads of State and Government of NATO Member States and the Russian Federation, 28 May, /10
2 NATO=: NATO, NATO NATO=NATO NATO= PJC NRC PJC NATO OSCE OSCE CJTF EAPC PFP NATO safety NBC combating nuclear trafficking possible NATO as appropriate NATO reciprocal exchanges NATO 2/10
3 NATO= NATO NATO 3 NRC NATO PJC NATO NATO 4 NATO NATO NATO NATO= (2)NATO=ロシア 協 力 の 実 績 NATO= PKO Operation Active Endeavour OAE PKO IFOR/SFOR KFOR IFOR/SFOR 3 NATO, NATO Update: NATO and Russia sign submarine rescue agreement, 8 February, < > 4 NATO NATO NATO /10
4 NATO=: NATO NATO KFOR 5 NATO= KFOR non-lethal goods NATO OAE OAE OAE NATO NRC PKO 2005 NRC NATO 2006 NATO PKO 7 (3) 二 重 拡 大 の 安 全 弁? NATO= NATO NATO NATO NATO WTO The Lessons of Kosovo, Testimony of Zbigniew Brzezinski to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, October 6, < < > Pytlivy Ladny NATO news:russian frigate deployed in Operation Active Endeavour < < > 7 Vincent Pouliot, International Security in Practice: the politics of NATO-Russia diplomacy, Cambridge University Press, 2010, p /10
5 1997 NATO 1999 WTO 2002 NATO NATO PJC NRC NATO NATO NATO NATO NATO NATO NATO PJC NATO= NATO KFOR PJC NRC 2002 NATO NATO 8 9 Dr. Stefan Forss, Russian Military Thinking and Threat Perception: A Finnish View, CERI Strategy Papers, no.5, Séminaire Stratégique du 13 novembre Putin says NATO enlargement is direct threat to Russia, China View (Xinhua), 4 April, < > 5/10
6 NATO=: NATO NRC NATO NRC NATO Wherever NATO 90 NATO NATO NRC 3. NATO=ロシア 関 係 を 動 かすもの (1)NATO=ロシア 関 係 の 蜜 月 と 対 立 NATO= NATO= 2006 NATO= Pouliot honeymoons rough patches NATO NATO NATO WTO NATO Pouliot, op. cit, p /10
7 PJC NRC NATO= 2000 NATO (2)NATO にとってのロシア ロシアにとっての NATO NATO NATO NATO NATO NATO NATO NATO PFP MAP NATO NATO NATO NATO CSBM NATO NATO NATO CSBM CSCE 2009 EST 2009 EST CSCE/OSCE 7/10
8 NATO=: NATO CSCE/OSCE 1990 OSCE 12 ODIHR HCNM 13 OSCE NATO EST OSCE EST EST 14 (3)NATO=ロシア 関 係 の 将 来 NATO NATO 2000 NATO PJC NRC NATO= NATO 2008 NATO NRC NATO 2010 NATO NATO= NATO NATO NATO 15 NATO OSCE 2011, Dov Lynch, Russia faces Europe, Chaillot Paper, no. 60, May 2003, pp Arthur R. Rachwald, A Reset of NATO-Russia relations: real or imaginary?, European Security, Vol.20, no.1, March 2011, p NATO 2020: assured security; dynamic engagement, Analysis and recommendations of the group of experts on a new strategic concept for NATO, 17 May, Strategic Concept for the Defence and Security of the Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation, adopted by Heads of State and Government in Lisbon, Active Engagement 8/10
9 NATO= NATO= NATO NATO NATO PJC NRC NATO NATO= NATO= MDMD MD NACC PJC NRC NATO= 4. おわりに NATO 20 NATO= finalité NATO 16 NATO NATO NATO= and Modern Defence, 19 November, Pouliot, op. cit., pp /10
10 NATO=: NATO ANTONENKO, Oksana and YURGENS, Igor, Towards a NATO-Russia Strategic Concept, Survival, Vol.52, no.6, December 2010-January 2011, pp ÅSLUND, Andrew and KUCHINS, Andrew, Pressing the Reset Button on US-Russia Relations, Policy Brief(CSIS Peterson Institute for International Economics), no.pb09-6, March MANKOFF, Jeffrey, Reforming the Euro-Atlantic Security Architecture: An Opportunity for U.S. Leadership, The Washington Quarterly, Vol.33, no.2, April 2010, pp MATTOX, Gale A., Resetting the US-Russian relationship: is cooperative engagement possible?, European Security, Vol.20, no.1, March 2011, pp McNAMARA, Sally, Russia s proposed New European Security Treaty: A Non-Starter for the US and Europe, Backgrounder, no.2463, September 16, POULIOT, Vincent, International Security in Practice: the politics of NATO-Russia diplomacy, Cambridge University Press, RACHWALD, Arthur R., A Reset of NATO-Russia relations: real or imaginary?, European Security, Vol.20, no.1, March 2011, pp SMITH, Julianne, The NATO-Russia Relationship Defining Moment or Déjà Vu?, Ifri and CSIS, November SZABO, Stephan F., Can Berlin and Washington Agree on Russia?, The Washington Quarterly, Vol.32, no.4, 2009, pp TRENIN, Dimitry, Russia leaves West, Foreign Affairs, July-August WEITZ, Richard, Illusive Visions and Practical Realities: Russia, NATO and Missile Defence, Survival, Vol.54, no.2, August-September 2010, pp Euro-Atlantic Security: One Vision, Three Paths, EastWest Institute, OSCE 2011 pp NATO (2000 )pp.1-36 : NATO NIDS NATO : NIDS /10
NATOの東方拡大―第一次拡大から第二次拡大へ
NATO 1989 North Atlantic Treaty Organization: NATO framework for a military alliance) political framework for an international alliance) 1 90 NATO 2 collective self-defence bottom line superstructure 3
(Western European Union WEU) (EU ) (European Defence Com munity EDC) 54 (European Community EC) EU WEU WEU NATO EU NATO (NATO or Nothing) 90 11 (Treat
North Atlantic Council NAC ) 98 12 EU 99 12 2003 60 ( ) (Political and Security Committee) (Military Committee) 2000 NATO EU NATO (du plication) (European Army)
冷戦後の戦略環境変化とクリントン政権
1998 11 3558 1 21 2 1 Paul D. Wolfowitz, Clinton s First Year, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 73, No. 15 (January/February, 1994). 2 91 36 3 91 G-7 G-7 4 G-7 5 (primacy) 6 1949 1950 1962 10 71 89 11 91 12 3 James
核開発問題をめぐる中国の北朝鮮政策―2002年10月~2005年11月―
2005 9 2002 10 1 2 5 3 4 2005 9 19 3 2002 10 16 10 James A. Kelly 50 1994 10 4 1 -ISSUE BRIEF-No.406, 2002.12.5 2 2002 10 2003 4 3 7 2003 8 4 U.S. Department of State, Press Statement, Richard Boucher,
CSIS 4 the Asia-Pacific, or the Indo-Pacific region Asia s Democratic Security Diamond 7 11 sea-faring democracies Lake Beijing
1 nifty 2010 2012 3 4 2011 6 20 9 24 1 2 2. 2013 1 3 5 3 2-25- 1 2 23 CSIS 4 the Asia-Pacific, or the Indo-Pacific region 5 2 28 6 12 27 Asia s Democratic Security Diamond 7 11 sea-faring democracies Lake
04_小松.indd
27 2012 p.41 57 Muammar Al-Qadhafi 40 2011 2 2 1000 4 1 3 19 NATO Operation Unified Protector 8 10 21 2 1 UN Doc., S/PV. 6490, February 25, 2011, pp. 2 4. 2 2012a 21 26 2012 73 42 3 4 1 3 8 100 24 4 NATO
美唄市広報メロディー2014年1月号
1 2014 [email protected] January May September October November December February March June July August April BIBAI CITY INFORMATION http://db.net-bibai.co.jp/bibai/
140 NDPG Defense of Japan 2010, pp. 2-3.
9 9/11 1 NDPG 10 NDPG 1976 1995 2004 2004 NDPG 2 NDPG 2010 12 2009 8 3 2011 3 11 1 Yasuaki Chijiwa, Japan s Security Outlook: Its Implications for the Defense Policy, in Asia Pacific Countries Security
国連安全保障理事会の拒否権―安保理改革問題に関連して―
2004 9 21 59 1 59 190 148 2 2003 3 2 15 3 2 1 1 4 24 1 39 41 42 5 5 5 5 1 59 2. 2004.10.4. 3 4 5 79 4,1980.10,pp.35-36. 1 27 6 15 9 9 5 7 (the
米軍の変革と在日米軍の再編
2003 1 5 4 9 Unified Combatant Command 2 3 30 10 4 5 1 2001 1,757 925 832 18,217 5,449 12,768 13,392 6,584 6,808 18,212 2,712 15,500 51,578 6 10 1 1986 38 1,200 2003 11 6 57,300 The International Institute
18 2 2016 2 5 6 Robert S. Ross 7 Charles L. Glaser 8 Susan Shirk 9 10 5 David Shambaugh, China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order Internationa
revisionist power status quo power 1 Aaron Friedberg 2 John J. Mearsheimer 3 4 David Shambaugh 2005 1 Alastair Iain Johnston, Is China a Status Quo Power? International Security, vol. 27, no. 4, (Spring
( 6 ) ( ) ( ) * 3 ( ) CIS 4 CIS ( ) ( 21 ) ( ) ( 30 ) * 4 CIS CIS * 3 Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady Ukrainy 9 (1992) Vidomos
1990 7 16 1991 10 24 7 START-1 12 1992 5 23 START-1 START-1 ICBM 176 1240 * 1 NPT NPT START-1 NPT START-1 NPT 1994 11 1996 6 * 2 6 * 1 6 SS-19 90 SS-19 40 10 SS-24 46 (Borys Kozhyn, Bezpeka Ukrainy ta
5
8 1kg U-235 20 IAEA IAEA 7 4.3 2003 10 79 IAEA 1 2004 2 2 IAEA IAEA IAEA IAEA IAEA 2003 10 NPT NPT 3 2004 1 4 3 5 IAEA 8.1 8.1.1 IAEA IAEA 1957 IAEA 1 IAEA 2 IAEA 3 Iran s Pact: Full Cooperation, The New
(2) (3) 2 vs vs (9) Edward Mansfield and Jack Snyder, Democratization and War, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 74, No
MEMOIRS OF SHONAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Vol. 39, No. 1, 2005 * Nationalism and National Security Masanori HASEGAWA* This article considers nationalism in terms of national security. Nationalism has been
untitled
Trade and Trade Finance in the 200809 Financial Crisis, IMF Working Paper WP/11/16., Understanding the Great Trade Collapse of 200809 and the Subsequent Trade Recovery, Economic Perspectives, 2Q/2011.
52 立教アメリカン スタディーズ Obama 2008:
オバマ政権と 変革 の課題 The Obama Administration's Agenda for "Change" 対外政策 特にラテンアメリカ政策を中心とした歴史的視点からの考察 An Analysis of Its Foreign, Particularly Latin American, Policy from a Historical Perspective 上村直樹 KAMIMURA
2011上宮太子_高校_学校案内
UENOMIYA TAISHI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL GUIDE BOOK 2011 www.uenomiya-taishi.ed.jp Curriculum Curriculum Letʼs enjoy school life at UT! 01 02 4 April 5 May 6 June 7 July 03 8 9 10 11 August September October
1970). Baumol, W. J., Panzar, J. C. and R. D. Willig (1982); Contestable Markets and The Theory of Industry Structure, 1982. Caves, R. and M. E. Porter (1977); From entry barriers to mobility barriers:
„h‹¤.05.07
Japanese Civilian Control in the Cold War Era Takeo MIYAMOTO In European and American democratic countries, the predominance of politics over military, i.e. civilian control, has been assumed as an axiom.
GDPギャップと潜在成長率
2003 output gap 80 1 20 90 20 70 2 1 2 output gap potential output 1 2 (2001) 3 potential rate of growth 2000 Meyer (2000) European Central Bank: (1999b) 2002 10 4 3 (2000) 4 4 () 5 5 5 6 () () 7 Total
, FAD FAD FED FAO FAO WFP 1999 NGO ) 1. FAD FAD 1999 Lee, FAD % national coping s
20 30 280 350 1995 Devereux, 1988: 270 282 Food Availability Decline: FAD Food Entitlement Decline: FED FAD FAD FED 2000, 2002 FAD FAD FAD FED FAD Lee, 2003 FED 1999 59 2000 2000, 2001 2002 FAD FAD FED
58 立教アメリカン スタディーズ
オバマ政権のアジア基軸戦略 Obama s Asia Pivot Strategy 1 その背景と展望 Its Background and Perspectives 藤木剛康 FJIKI Takeyasu 2011 11 17 2 Asia Pivot Strategy 1 2 3 4 1. Rikkyo American Studies 35 (March 2013) opyright 2013
State Committee of Russian Federation on Statistics 1 2 12 State Committee of Russian Federation on Statistics 53
I State Committee of Russian Federation on Statistics 52 State Committee of Russian Federation on Statistics 1 2 12 State Committee of Russian Federation on Statistics 53 State Committee of Russian Federation
本文①.indd
Hiroshima Journal of International Studies Volume The Ikeda Administration s Diplomacy toward Europe and the Three-Pillar Theory Shintaro IKEDA The Aim of this paper is to examine Japan s diplomacy toward
æ 1 2 3 rentier state s rent æ æ 1 Zanoyan 2 Gambill æ 3 æ 1987 Luciani Beblawi The Rentier State 4 Luciani Beblawi Luciani 40 æ World Development Indicators 10 1 UNDP 10 / æ æ No.37 2004 19 æ Sadowski
untitled
1978 83 84 1989 6 10 3 84 6 10 12 10 2 84 12 1992: 443; 1995: 490 85 85 8 50 1) 1984 85 86 80 3 1997: 24 84 86 86 13 1987 10 50 1991: 34 48 1997: 27; 1991: 34 48 2) 4 13 80 3) 4) 3 1989 6 88 4 Vol. 54,
本組よこ/本組よこ_古川_P289-310
289 THEODORE McNELLY, Witness to the TWENTIETH CENTURY The Life Story of a Japan Specialist THEODORE McNELLY, Witness to the TWENTIETH CENTURY The Life Story of a Japan Specialist Xlibris Corporation Contemporary
国際流動性に関する財政的側面について
IMF SDR IMF 2011 6 1 2 2011 E-mail: [email protected] / /2011.10 35 1. 2007 2009 2 Goodhart [1999] 2010 11 2. 4 1970 IMF 1960 36 /2011.10 international reserve 1 D 35 1 D 35 1960 Eichengreen [2011]
untitled
ネGネ^ネbネdネjネZネZネW ネC ヌ Oleg A Timofeev THE CONCEPTS POWER ヲ AND FORCE ヲ IN MODERN THEORIES OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS V ( ); 675028 21 E-mail: timooa@mailru Mr Oleg A Timofeev V PhD in History Senior Researcher
仏大 社会学部論集56号(P)☆/7.瀧本・青木
2 1 2 1950 1 2009 2 34 4 662 1 20 20 8 4 1 4 4 20 5 1 2 1 2009. 9. 30 1990. 9. 30 2010. 12. 31 143,091 227,586 54,431 126,802 46,593 35,329 25,689 41,344 24,655 5,766 14,204 9,779 7,131 25,111 9,318 1945
43 2016.3 6 EU 2:パワーとは 何 か 7 GDP 8 A B 9 10 EU EU 28 5 820 GDP18 5271 11 2014 EU 32.4% 20.4% 12 EU28 2541 49 13 EU CSDP EPA Economic Partnership Agree
企 画 論 文 EU の 規 範 政 治 パワー 規 範 パワーそして 規 範 政 治 へ 市 川 顕 1:はじめに The European Union: EU EU 2015 11 17 HP EU EU 1 EU 2015 10 10 22 2 EU 1990 3 EU EU EU EU EU sui generis 4 EU EU 5 5 EU EU Normative Power Europe:
Microsoft Word - 博士論文要約(稲澤宏行).doc
(norm) (Constructivism) material ( ) 1 2 3 (2001 ) ( ) (1949 ) (1949 ) 4 1 2005 241 2 2011 21 3 1949 4 (1949 ) 1 ( ) (2001 ) (1987 ) 1980 ( ) 1967 (1976 ) 5 ( ) 1 2 3 ( ) 1976 2 1 2 3 1976 (1967 ) 6 5
72 10 7 5 1 2 3 1. Prevention/Mitigation Preparedness Response Relief/Recovery 6 5 2011 52-57 6 mitigation 23 6 25 35-36
71 1 2011 23 3 11 2 10 Operation Tomodachi UNOCHA SIPRI 3 4 1 2 23 6 25 3 SIPRI, The Effectiveness of Foreign Military Assets in Natural Disaster Response (Stockholm: SIPRI, 2008), p. 9. 4 Wilton Park
- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
M&A IMF IMF gold tranche - March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade IMF IMF IMF GATT OECD OECD BITs. - March. U I = I (r m, i, Z * r m i Z * (= Z / Z) I / r m > I / i < I / Z *
Operation Vantage Joint Intelligence Committee
2010 クウェートの安全保障体制 歴史と現状 国際学研究科博士後期課程 2 年 村上拓哉 キーワード : クウェート 安全保障 小国 はじめに 1 クウェート安全保障史 (1) イギリスによる保護 18 1756 1793 1795 1 1899 1 23 71 1901 1920 1922 3 2 1961 6 19 6 6 25 7 1 42 Operation Vantage 10 1962
Sakamoto Shigeki ICRW ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJ ICJ ITLOS ICJ 4 7 NZ 201
Sakamoto Shigeki 2010 5 31 ICRW ICJ 1 2010 7 13 ICJ 2011 5 9 2012 3 9 2 ICJ ICJ 3 2013 6 26 7 16 ICJICJ 36 2 4 5 6 ICJ ITLOS 2000 2007 ICJ 4 7 NZ 2010 12 15 NZ NZ No. 636 2014 11 6 NZ ICJ NZ ICJ Keith
中国のイスラム教徒―歴史と現況
2003.9.25. 38 56 56 91 1,618 1,068 982 894 840 776 803 581 542 55 1949 1950 1970 50 2,030 China Daily, October 16, 2003., 1988, pp.55-56. 2000 2003, 2003, p.356. 39 55 55 55 1945, 1999, p.68. Thomas Herber,
