2006a2007b Beebeatal1990 3) ) 2 1 DiscourseCompletionTest DCT 2 roleplay DCT DCT DC

Similar documents
Beebeetal1990 Beebeetal1990 Beebeetal1990 Direct A. Performative I refuse B. Nonperformative Statement 1. No 1. No 2. Negative Wil

2 except for a female subordinate in work. Using personal name with SAN/KUN will make the distance with speech partner closer than using titles. Last

福岡大学人文論叢47-3

06...E...z.....q.ec6

1. interlanguage 1970 (phonology) morphology syntax Hymes 1972 (communicative competence) Interlanguage Pragmatics Blum- Kulka, House, & Kasper, 1989


NINJAL Research Papers No.14

()

Kyushu Communication Studies 第2号

Maynard Zimmerman Maynard & Zimmerman Maynard & Zimmerman Maynard & Zimmerman

Ł×

橡LET.PDF


% 95% 2002, 2004, Dunkel 1986, p.100 1

07_高平小百合.indd

What s your name? Help me carry the baggage, please. politeness What s your name? Help me carry the baggage, please. iii


( ) ( ) ( 2001) (1995) (1993) ( ) ( 1997: 42) (1997: 61 70) 1) 2) 3) ( 1988) ( ) ) ( J ) 2) 20 3) 4) (2000)

09‘o’–

high collar

07_太田美帆.indd

of one s information (hearsay, personal experience, traditional lore), or epistemological stance may be expected of all speakers. This is especially t

山大紀要13

橡ボーダーライン.PDF

pp

11_寄稿論文_李_再校.mcd

銀行の不良債権問題と資本市場の経営監視機能 鹿野嘉昭

NINJAL Research Papers No.8

04(....) (..)..

tikeya[at]shoin.ac.jp The Function of Quotation Form -tte as Sentence-final Particle Tomoko IKEYA Kobe Shoin Women s University Institute of Linguisti

蝨ー蝓溯・豐サ縺ィ繧ウ繝溘Η繝九ユ繧」蠖「謌舌↓髢「縺吶k螳滓・隱ソ譟サ・域擲莠ャ迚茨シ峨€仙悸邵ョ縺ェ縺励€・indd

process of understanding everyday language is similar, finally as far as word production is concerned, individual variations seem to be greater at an

授受補助動詞の使用制限に与える敬語化の影響について : 「くださる」「いただく」を用いた感謝表現を中心に

(’Ó)”R

<8ED089EF8B D312D30914F95742E696E6464>

Admissions Assistance Office

教育実践上の諸問題


Powered by TCPDF ( Title 米国における障害者を対象とした野外教育 : 米国の障害者政策と障害者教育の変遷との関連 Sub Title Outdoor education for people with disabilities in United



一 先 行 研 究 と 問 題 の 所 在 19


第2章 近代日本の貧困観

2016 Fall Lecture 05 on Comm HO

家庭科教育における調理技能の位置づけ

日経テレコン料金表(2016年4月)

73 p p.152


_Print

A p A p. 224, p B pp p. 3.

p

9

() L () 20 1

戦後の補欠選挙

B

Microsoft Word - 田中亮太郎.doc

122011pp

2

スラヴ_00A巻頭部分

Microsoft Word - 映画『東京裁判』を観て.doc

308 ( ) p.121

広報かみす 平成28年6月15日号

.

ODA NGO NGO JICA JICA NGO JICA JBIC SCP

untitled

untitled

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

01_31窶愴胆1窶窶ー窶慊イfiツ。01-16

学校保健304号

学校保健特別増刊号

学校保健290号

04長谷川英伸_様.indd

56


Language Use in Atarashii Rekishi Kyokasho : Based on a comparative survey of 8 textbooks of Japanese history for junior high school student

\615L\625\761\621\745\615\750\617\743\623\6075\614\616\615\606.PS


2

untitled

昭和恐慌期における長野県下農業・農村と産業組合の展開過程

05_小田眞幸 様.indd


2reN-A14.dvi

...S.....\1_4.ai

EPSON エプソンプリンタ共通 取扱説明書 ネットワーク編

ありがとうございました

EPSON エプソンプリンタ共通 取扱説明書 ネットワーク編

公務員人件費のシミュレーション分析


橡hashik-f.PDF

198


1

新婚世帯家賃あらまし

05[ ]戸田(責)村.indd

untitled

ネットショップ・オーナー2 ユーザーマニュアル

/9/ ) 1) 1 2 2) 4) ) ) 2x + y 42x + y + 1) 4) : 6 = x 5) : x 2) x ) x 2 8x + 10 = 0

2

Transcription:

No.402007 12 Abstract This paper discusses Refusal expressions by Japanese university students and high school students. The results of my Discourse Role tests show: 1. When university students refuse the request by their elder brothers and sisters, they work on the requester's selfish-face by using statement of alternative. 2. When high school students refuse the request, they work on the selfish-face of their elder brothers and sisters by using insult. 3. To close seniors, university students and high school students work on the mutual face by using apology. 4. To close seniors, university students work on speaker's negative face, too. But high school students do not do so. (Discourse Role test) (politeness) (Semantic formulas) (face) 1 1) 2) 2007a - 343 -

2006a2007b Beebeatal1990 3) 2 2004 10 2006 7 8 1921 50 1718 50 4) 2 1 DiscourseCompletionTest DCT 2 roleplay DCT DCT DC - 344 -

No.402007 12 2 Discoursecompletiontest Roleplay turntaking DiscourseRoletest 3 3 1 1-345 -

4 1 2 3 3.1 Beebeetal1990 1993 5-346 -

No.402007 12 3.2 BrownandLevinson1978 BL Goffman1976 5) face positiveface 6) negativeface 7) FaceThreatening ActsFTA positiveface negativeface positivepoliteness 8) negativepoliteness politenessstrategy socialdistance power absolute rankingofimposition FTA weight FTA FTA offrecordnegativepolitenesspositivepoliteness baldonrecord 1 DotheFTA DontdotheFTA FTA onrecordoffrecord baldonrecord facesavingact FTA positivepoliteness negativepoliteness Lesser FTA weight Greater - 347 -

BL BL Thomas1995 2002 negativeface positiveface 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 bald on record () () 1 negative face + 1 1 positive face negative face 1 2 positive face negative face - 348 -

No.402007 12 6 selfishface or speakersface mutualface hearersface positiveface negativeface semifacepositiveface negativeface positiveface positiveface negativeface positiveface negativeface negativeface positiveface negativeface semiface negativeface - 349 -

4 4.1 7 7 selfishface positive negative face face semiface 9) 11) 12) hearers mutualface face positiveface positiveface positive face 10) positiveface negativeface 89 13) 12 911 2620 21 01 012322 12 35 54 22 01 01 01 10 10 46 1326 10 41 140 10 011322-350 -

No.402007 12 selfishface positiveface selfishface negativeface negative face 2-351 -

3 23 negativeface 2 negativeface 3 negative face 3 negativeface negativeface negativeface 3 4.2-352 -

No.402007 12 8 positive face selfishface negative face semiface hearers mutualface face positiveface positiveface positiveface positiveface negativeface 7803 02 22 63 20 48 1016 30 409422 03 01 02 22 20 48 1017 30 10 49 1120 30 305411 01 01 20 10 01 32 20 40 20 02 10 101001 10 20 40-353 -

selfishface mutualface selfishface mutualface mutual face positive face positive face positive face negative face 4 (mutual face positive face positive face) 5 (mutual face positive face positive face) 6 (mutual face positive face negative face) 45 positiveface positiveface - 354 -

No.402007 12 positiveface 6 positiveface negativeface negativeface 4 1 ( )selfish-face negative face negativeface 2 ( ) mutual face mutual face positive face positive face positive mutual face positive face negative face negativeface negativeface negativeface - 355 -

1) Searle1969 2) 1996 3) 4) 1994p31 5) BL face positiveface negativeface 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) hearersface negativeface semiface 11) selfishface positiveface 40 7 selfishface positiveface 40 selfishface positiveface 12) selfishface positiveface 20 3 selfishface positiveface 20 selfishface positiveface 13) 89 8 9 2002 ol31no1 ol31no13 1992 79 pp4151 1996-356 -

No.402007 12 22 1993 2 28 2 pp 37 2006a 2006b 37 2007a 70 2007b 34 2003 24 pp6077 1996 Vol5pp515 1994 9 pp2939 1992 BeebeLM TakahashiT UlissWeltzR1990 PragmaticTransferinRefusals InRCScarcellaEAndersonSCKrasheneds DevelopingCommunicative CompetenceinaSecondLanguageNewYork pp5573newburyhousepublishers BrownP SCLevinson1987Politeness SomeUniversalsinLanguageUsage Cambridge CambridgeUniversityPress GoffmanE1976 RepliesandResponses LanguageinSocietyVol5pp257313 CambridgeUniversityPress HindsJ1982EllipsisinJapaneseCarbondaleILLinguisticResearchInc MiriamE BodmanJ1993 ExpressingGratitudeinAmericanEnglish EnglishTeaching49 pp221225 TanakaN1993Thepragmaticsofuncertaintyitsrealizationandinterpretationin EnglishandJapaneseUnpublishedPhDThesisLancasterUniversity ThomasJ 1995 MeaninginInteraction AnIntroductiontoPragmaticsLondon Longman 1998-357 -