[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2

Similar documents
Keynes 1936 Tobin 1 Hicks 1937 Keynes IS LM 2 IS LM 3 IS LM Keynes Keynes animal spirits

( ) z W n u K P N P = (1 + z)wn N = nuk (1) (2) I/K u e f r l (= L/PK) (4) I K = g(u, r, e f, l ) g u > 0, g r < 0, g e f > 0,

株式分割払込制度と企業金融、設備投資の関係について ─1930年代初において株式追加払込が果たした役割を中心に─

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

LA-VAR Toda- Yamamoto(1995) VAR (Lag Augmented vector autoregressive model LA-VAR ) 2 2 Nordhaus(1975) 3 1 (D2)


橡motonishi.PDF

<96D889BA904D2E696E6464>

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

46−ª3�=4�“ƒ‚S“·‚Ö‡¦

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

小塚匡文.indd

財政赤字の経済分析:中長期的視点からの考察

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C

, 3, 1999, 4,,

Y-...W

わが国銀行業の将来像― 預金通貨需要からのアプローチによるマクロ的サイズの検討―

untitled

1990年代以降の日本の経済変動

D F I CP (equity finance) CP (debt finance) ( )

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

国際流動性に関する財政的側面について


経済経営研究

日本における財政政策のインパクトー1990年代のイベント・スタディー


headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s

02.„o“φiflì„㙃fic†j

デフレ不況下の金融政策をめぐる政治過程


GDPギャップと潜在成長率

(1) (Karlan, 2004) (1) (1973) (1978) (1991) (1991) 1

, Exchange & Finamce

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

untitled

物価変動の決定要因について ― 需給ギャップと物価変動の関係の国際比較を中心に―




/2

季刊 企業と法創造 第1巻第4号(通巻第4号)

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

untitled

アジアの資本移動の変化に関するクラスター分析 アジア域内の証券投資活性化に向けて


Powered by TCPDF ( Title 金利現実化措置以後の韓国における企業金融 : 年 Sub Title Korean corporate finance between 1965 and 1971 Author 李, 明輝 (Lee,

取引銀行の破綻が企業経営に及ぼす影響について-阪和銀行破綻の事例分析-

非上場企業におけるコーポレート・ガバナンス

50-4 平井健之.pwd

ワールド・ワイド 10‐2(P)/3.中尾

商学 65‐5☆/14.植田


Masahiro NAKANO Keynes benchmark Keynes 89

論文08.indd

物価指数の計測誤差と品質調整手法:わが国CPIからの教訓

RIETI Highlight VOL.25

-February FRB BIS IMF BIS Spillover Spillovers BIS IMF EMEs

2 / 24

1 1 1 [2000]


6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21

SNAと家計調査における貯蓄率の乖離-日本の貯蓄率低下の要因-

untitled

【表紙】経済学論叢_18号/表1・3・背

表紙_目次.PDF


- March IMF IMF IMF ITO The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade

OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

082_rev2_utf8.pdf

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

M&A の経済分析:M&A はなぜ増加したのか

わが国のレポ市場について―理論的整理と実証分析―


Microsoft Word - 荳ク闌ゆソ雁スヲ

公的機関が関与した企業再生支援

2) 3) 2) Ohkusa, 1996 ; 1999 ; Ohtake and Ohkusa, 1994 ; La Croix and A. Kawamura, Reject American Economic Review, Journal of Political Econom

Tomorrow Next th draft version MEW SWET

2

復活だぁっ! 日本の不況と流動性トラップの逆襲

橡表紙参照.PDF

ベンチャー・キャピタル投資契約の

公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ

村本 孜51‐85/51‐85

開発金融増刊号

ID JJF00296 Earnings management and market timing: The case of Japanese management buyouts Yasutomo Tsukioka 2-16 Japan Journal of Finance Vol.

プリント

<966B8DE2905E88EA2E696E6464>


研究シリーズ第40号

PDFŠpŒ{Ł¶

オーストラリア研究紀要 36号(P)☆/3.橋本

第2章 経済成長と所得分配: マレーシアの事例を中心に


OSIPP40_p1_2.eps

DGE DGE (1) ( 1

fiúŁÄ”s‘ê‡ÌŁª”U…−…X…N…v…„…~…A…•‡Ì ”s‘ê™´›ß…−…^†[…fiŠ‚ª›Âfl’«

untitled

産業・企業レベルデータで見た日本の経済成長.pdf

<93638CB48FBA8E6C2E696E6464>

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

Transcription:

2002 4 1 1990 1 525-8577 1-1-1. Tel.: 077-561-4855. Fax.: 077-561-3964. E-mail: khori@ec.ritsumei.ac.jp 1

[17]Holmström and Tirole (2000) (1) (2) (1) (2) 1 1 2

MM MM MM MM CP 0 3

1 1990 1970 2 2 1 1 17% 5% 3 2 20 5% 1 4 3 1 5 1990 1997 4

2 3 4 5 2 2.1 MM [35]Townsend (1979) [38]Williamson (1987) 5

2 3 q q [8]Fazzari, Hubbard and Petersen (1988) [22]Kaplan and Zingales (1997) [8]Fazzari, Hubbard and Petersen (1988) [22]Kaplan and Zingales (1997) [8]Fazzari, Hubbard and Petersen (1988) 2 3 [20]Hubbard(1998) 6

4 [19]Hoshi, Kashyap and Scharfstein (1991) [19]Hoshi, Kashyap and Scharfstein (1991) [19]Hoshi, Kashyap and Scharfstein (1991) [13]Hayashi and Inoue (1991) [19]Hoshi, Kashyap and Scharfstein (1991) [13] Hayashi and Inoue (1991) [19]Hoshi, Kashyap and Scharfstein (1991) [14]Hayashi (1997) [19]Hoshi, Kashyap and Scharfstein (1991) 5 4 [9]Fazzari, Hubbard and Petersen (2000) [23]Kaplan and Zingales (2000) 5 q 7

2.2 2.1 [35]Townsend (1979) [38]Williamson (1987) [5]Bernanke and Gertler (1989) [5]Bernanke and Gertler (1989) [35]Townsend (1979) [38]Williamson (1987) [5]Bernanke and Gertler (1989) [1]Aghion and Bolton (1997) [5]Bernanke and Gertler (1989) [11]Greenwald and Stiglitz (1993) (1) 1 (2) (3) 8

[28]Kiyotaki and Moore (1997) [28]Kiyotaki and Moore (1997) 6 2.3 7 [29]Lucas (1990) [10]Fuerst (1992) 6 [6]Bernanke, Gertler and Gilchrist (1996) 7 [18] 1997 9

(1) (2) CD (3) 3 2 CD 3 [3]Bernanke (1983) [33]Romer and Romer (1990) [4]Bernanke and Blinder (1992) [27]Kashyap, Stein and Wilcox (1993) [33]Romer and Romer (1990) [4]Bernanke and Blinder (1992) [27]Kashyap, Stein and Wilcox (1993) 10

[27]Kashyap, Stein and Wilcox (1993) CP [24]Kashyap, Lamont and Stein (1994) [26]Kashyap and Stein (1995) [25]Kashyap, Lamont and Stein (1994) 1982 [37]Ueda (1993) [21] 1995 [15] 1995 [32] 1997 [30] 2000 [37]Ueda (1993) [15] 1995 [32] 1997 [30] 2000 [21] 1995 3 3.1 11

VAR VAR VAR 3.2 [12]Granger (1969) [34]Sims (1980) innovation accounting Granger VECM [36]Toda and Yamamoto (1995) VAR [36]Toda and Yamamoto (1995) VAR [36]Toda and Yamamoto (1995) 8 VAR 8 [2] 2000 12

3.3 CALL RLOAN INV SALES LIQ1 LIQ2 CALL RLOAN 2 LIQ1 LIQ2 2 LIQ1 LIQ2 2 INV SALES LIQ1 LIQ2 1 1973 2 LIQ2 1973 2 1970 2 2000 2 2 4 4.1 [7]Dickey and Fuller (1979) Augmented Dickey-Fuller ADF ADF AIC [31]Pantula et al. (1994) AIC 2 13

9 ADF 3 LIQ1 ADF 4 LIQ1 LIQ1 I(0) I(1) 4.2 Granger LIQ1 0 [36]Toda and Yamamoto (1995) Granger VAR k VAR VAR I(1) k +1 VAR k 0 Granger F Q1 Q3 1. A: CALL, INV, SALES, LIQ1 2. B CALL, INV, SALES, LIQ2 3. C RLOAN, INV, SALES, LIQ1 4. D RLOAN, INV, SALES, LIQ2 A VAR k =4 A LIQ1 I(1) A 5 5 5 LIQ1 INV LIQ1 SALES 9 ADF 14

CALL B B I(1) B 5 B 6 6 5 LIQ2 SALES INV SALES A CALL RLOAN C 7 C 5 7 A C SALES INV B CALL RLOAN D 8 D 5 8 D B A C 1970 3 2000 B D 1974 3 2000 1970 A C B D B D 1974 3 2000 A C 9 10 INV SALES LIQ1 SALES A C B D 1974 5 10 Granger 3 15

4.3 Granger Granger 1974 3 2000 A 10 4 5 6 4.4 Granger 3 Granger 1 10 1 inovation accounting 16

2 2 VAR I(1) X t = Φ 1 X t 1 + + Φ 5 X t 5 + Φ 6 Z t + u t X t INV t SALES t LIQ1 t LIQ2 t 3 1 Φ s (t =1,, 5) 3 3 Φ 6 3 6 Z t Q 1,Q 2,Q 3 dcall t drloan t 3 6 u t 0 3 1 dcall t = CALL t CALL t 1 drloan t = RLOAN t RLOAN t 1 VAR 7 7 Granger 17

Granger Granger [13]Hayashi and Inoue (1991) 11 q Granger [13]Hayashi and Inoue (1991) [19]Hoshi, Kashyap and Scharfstein (1991) Granger [37]Ueda (1993) [30] 2000 12 [21] 1995 11 Granger 12 18

[18] 1997 [21] 1995 [18] 1997 [21] 1995 1990 1 2000 5 Granger 19

1 VAR Granger Granger VAR 2 Granger VAR 3 4 2 A 1974 3 2000 1970 2000 2 1. 20

13 2. 3. 14 15 4. 16 70 1.98 5. 6. 13 10 14 15 90 68SNA 16 [30] 2000 21

1 0.1299 0.0203 0.0422 0.0057 0.1721 0.0214 0.0268 0.0028 0.0256 0.0038 0.0524 0.0054 1. cash on hand and in the U.S. banks U.S. government and other securities 2. Quarterly Financial Report for Manufacturing, Mining, and Trade Corporations(U.S. Census Bureau) 22

2 CALL 0.6585 9.9176 14.6678-41.1497 RLOAN 0.0897 9.5652 8.8065-26.0152 INV 0.0375 0.0100 0.0657 0.0181 SALES 0.7183 0.0618 0.9023 0.5908 LIQ1 0.3430 0.0480 0.4557 0.2852 LIQ2 0.3433 0.0476 0.4570 0.2865 1. CALL RLOAN INV SALES LIQ1 LIQ2 CALL RLOAN 23

3 0 CALL 9-2.3644 RLOAN 12-2.4502 INV 9-1.6643 SALES 2-2.2323 LIQ1 6-2.5961* LIQ2 6-2.0517 1. CALL RLOAN INV SALES LIQ1 LIQ2 CALL RLOAN 2. LIQ2 1970 3 2000 LIQ2 1973 2000 3. * 10% ** 5% 24

4 1 CALL 8-3.5695** RLOAN 12-2.6471* INV 9-3.1976* SALES 4-5.1078** LIQ2 5-2.8612* 1. CALL RLOAN INV SALES LIQ1 LIQ2 CALL RLOAN 2. LIQ2 1970 3 2000 2 LIQ2 1973 3 2000 2 3. * 10% ** 5% 25

5 Granger A CALL INV SALES LIQ1 CALL 252.9894** 0.6043 1.7934 0.6580 INV 0.6804 12.3410** 2.2498 4.1613** SALES 0.2278 1.4746 21.8042** 2.8677* LIQ1 0.9376 0.2284 3.4464* 200.0004** 1. CALL INV SALES LIQ1 CALL 2. 1970 3 2000 3. F ** 1% * 5% Granger 26

6 Granger B CALL INV SALES LIQ2 CALL 220.6124** 0.6469 1.6798 0.8904 INV 0.6459 13.1849** 1.9303 3.5572* SALES 0.2409 3.7965* 31.1230** 1.4594 LIQ2 1.0593 0.6201 4.1463** 191.5510** 1. CALL INV SALES LIQ2 CALL 2. 1974 3 2000 3. F ** 1% * 5% Granger 27

7 Granger C RLOAN INV SALES LIQ1 RLOAN 3494.090** 0.4447 0.3583 0.6482 INV 0.4466 10.6053** 2.5729* 4.1412** SALES 1.4654 1.5799 17.4497** 2.9877* LIQ1 0.8888 0.3019 3.4093* 183.9805** 1. CALL INV SALES LIQ1 RLOAN 2. 1970 3 2000 3. F ** 1% * 5% Granger 28

8 Granger D RLOAN INV SALES LIQ2 RLOAN 2967.787** 0.5045 0.2364 1.0640 INV 0.4745 11.3649** 2.4082 3.4043* SALES 1.3784 3.9043** 26.2757** 1.6925 LIQ2 1.1412 0.7119 4.2372** 171.0912** 1. RLOAN INV SALES LIQ2 RLOAN 2. 1974 3 2000 3. F ** 1% * 5% Granger 29

9 Granger CALL INV SALES LIQ1 CALL 222.0788** 0.6713 1.7507 0.9216 INV 0.6056 12.9335** 1.8728 3.6734** SALES 0.2406 4.0836** 27.9232** 1.5883 LIQ1 1.0394 0.9431 4.0131** 180.3559** 1. CALL INV SALES LIQ1 RLOAN 2. 1974 3 2000 3. F ** 1% * 5% Granger 30

10 Granger RLOAN INV SALES LIQ1 RLOAN 2972.822** 0.3929 0.1897 0.9842 INV 0.4186 11.4474** 2.2577 3.6186** SALES 1.2572 4.1702** 23.7164** 1.7930 LIQ1 0.9268 0.9914 3.9940** 161.9097** 1. RLOAN INV SALES LIQ1 RLOAN 2. 1974 3 2000 3. F ** 1% * 5% Granger 31

[1] Aghion, P., and P. Bolton (1997), A Theory of Trickle-Down Growth and Development with Debt Overhang, Review of Economic Studies, 64, 151-172. [2] 2000 VAR ECM 48 pp. 41-59 [3] Bernanke, B. S. (1983), Nonmonetary Effects of the Financial Crisis in the Propagation of the Great Depression, American Economic Review, 73, 257-276. [4] Bernanke, B. S., and A. S. Blinder (1992), The Federal Funds Rate and the Channels of Monetary Transmission, American Economic Review, 82, 901-921. [5] Bernanke, B. S., and M. Gertler (1989), Agency Costs, Net Worth, and Business Fluctuations, American Economic Review, 79, 14-31. [6] Bernanke, B. S., M. Gertler, and S. Gilchrist (1996), The Financial Accelerator and the Flight to Quality, Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 1-15. [7] Dickey, D. A., and W. A. Fuller (1979), Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74, 427-431. [8] Fazzari, S., G. Hubbard, and B. Petersen (1988), Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, 1,141-195. [9] Fazzari, S., G. Hubbard, and B. Petersen (2000), Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Are Useful: A Comment on Kaplan and Zingales, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 695-705. [10] Fuerst, T. S. (1992), Liquidity, Loanable Funds and Real Activity, Journal of Monetary Economics, 29, 3-24. 32

[11] Greenwald, B., and J. Stiglitz (1993), Financial Market Imperfections and Business Cycles, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 77-114. [12] Granger, C. W. J. (1969), Investigating Casual Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods, Econometrica, 37, 161-194. [13] Hayashi, F., and T. Inoue (1991), The Relation between Firm Growth and Q with Multiple Capital Goods: Theory and Evidence from Panel Data on Japanese Firms, Econometrica, 59, 731-753. [14] Hayashi, F. (1997), The Main Bank System and Corporate Investment: An Empirical Reassessment, NBER Working Paper, 6172. [15] 1995 [16] Holmström, B., and J. Tirole (1998), Private and Public Supply of Liquidity, Journal of Political Economy, 106,1-40. [17] Holmström, B., and J. Tirole (2000), Liquidity and Risk Management, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 32, 295-319. [18] 1997 16 1 pp.105-136 [19] Hoshi, T., A. K. Kashyap, and D. Scharfstein (1991), Corporate Structure, Liquidity, and Investment: Evidence from Japanese Panel Data, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106,33-60. [20] Hubbard, R. G. (1998), Capital-market Imperfections and Investment, Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 193-225. [21] 1995 [22] Kaplan, S. N., and L. Zingales (1997), Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 169-215. 33

[23] Kaplan, S. N., and L. Zingales (2000), Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Are Not Valid Measures of Financing Constraints, Quarterly Journal of Economics,,707-712. [24] Kashyap, A. K., O. Lamont, and J. C. Stein (1994), Credit Conditions and the Cyclical Behavior of Inventories: A Case Study of the 1981-82 Recession, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109,565-592. [25] Kashyap, A. K., and J. C. Stein (1994), Monetary Policy and Bank Lending, inn.g.mankiw,ed.,monetary Policy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. [26] Kashyap, A. K., and J. C. Stein (1995), The Impact of Monetary Policy on Bank Balance Sheets, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 42, 151-195. [27] Kashyap, A. K., J. C. Stein, and D. W. Wilcox (1993), Monetary Policy and Credit Conditions: Evidence from the Composition of External Finance, American Economic Review, 83, 78-98. [28] Kiyotaki, N., and J. Moore (1997), Credit Cycles, Journal of Political Economy, 105, 211-248. [29] Lucas, R. E. (1990), Liquidity and Interest Rates, Journal of Economic Theory, 50, 237-264. [30] 2000 [31] Pantula, S. G., L. Pinkowitz, G. Gonzalez-Farias, and W. A. Fuller (1994), A Comparison of Unit-Root Test Criteria, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 12, 449-459. [32] 1997 34

[33] Romer, C. D., and D. H. Romer (1990), New Evidence on the Monetary Transmission Mechanism, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1,149-213. [34] Sims, C. (1980), Macroeconomics and Reality, Econometrica, 48, 1-48. [35] Townsend, R. (1979), Optimal Contracts and Competitive Markets with Costly State Verification, Journal of Economic Theory, 21, 265-293. [36] Toda, H., and T. Yamamoto (1995), Statistical Inference in Vector Autoregressions with Possibly Integrated Processes, Journal of Econometirics, 66, 225-250. [37] Ueda, K., (1993), A Comparative Perspective on Japanese Monetary Policy: Short-Run Monetary Control and the Transmission Mechanism, ink.j.singleton,ed.,japanese Monetary Policy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. [38] Williamson, S. D. (1987), Costly Monitoring, Loan Contracts, and Equilibrium Credit Rationing, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102,135-145. 35