50 Planned Happenstance Parsons Brown Brooks, Gelatt Gelatt 1962 Gelatt, positive uncertainty nonrational Gelatt, 1

Similar documents
論文1

The Japanese Journal of Health Psychology, 29(S): (2017)

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1991, Vol. 62, No. 3, A study on the reliability and validity of a scale to measure shyness as a trait Atsu

_02新井.indd

e.g., Mahoney, Vandell, Simpkins, & Zarrett, Bohnert, Fredricks, & Randall2010 breadth intensitydurationengagement e.g., Mahone


THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY 2007, Vol. 15 No. 2, 217–227

パーソナリティ研究 2005 第13巻 第2号 170–182


02[ ]小山・池田(責)岩.indd


+深見将志.indd

女性管理職のキャリア形成プロセスにおける ワークモチベーションと自己調整に関する一考察 A Study on Work Motivation and Self-Regulation in the Career Development Process of Women in Management Ki

パーソナリティ研究2006 第14巻 第2号 214–226

〈論文〉高校生の学校適応と社会的スキルおよびソーシャルサポートとの関連--不登校生徒との比較

Jpn. J. Personality 18(2): (2009)

CMCの社会的ネットワークを介した社会的スキルと孤独感との関連性

共栄大学研究論集

20 Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 1989, 37, 20 \28 THE WILLINGNESS OF SELF-DISCLOSURE AND THE DEVIATION FROM NORMATIVE SELF-DISCLOSURE IN

untitled

越智59.qxd

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

2 251 Barrera, 1986; Barrera, e.g., Gottlieb, 1985 Wethington & Kessler 1986 r Cohen & Wills,

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

Newgarten, BL., Havighrst, RJ., & Tobin, S.Life Satisfaction Index-A LSIDiener. E.,Emmons,R.A.,Larsen,R.J.,&Griffin,S. The Satisfaction With Life Scal

01_渡部先生_21-2.indd

A pp CALL College Life CD-ROM Development of CD-ROM English Teaching Materials, College Life Series, for Improving English Communica

心理学部紀要 7号☆/4.三川

Adult Attachment Projective AAP PARS PARS PARS PARS Table

202


評論・社会科学 85号(よこ)(P)/3.佐分

(2002a) (1) American Psychiatric Association, (1985) (1989) 1985 (1998) (1999a) (2) 1995 Grotevant, 1998 Leary, T

St. Andrew's University NII-Electronic Library Service

ÿþbÎW'Yf[

social capital; SC SC Kawachi Subramanian & Kim 2008 Krishna & Uphoff 1999 Putnum 2000 SC SC SC SC : SC Theall, De Jong, S

OJT Planned Happenstance

スポーツ教育学研究(2013. Vol.33, No1, pp.1-13)

本文24号.PDF

_Y13™n‹ä

大谷教育福祉研究 39号☆/1.熊野

橡本文(第4稿).PDF

04-p45-67cs5.indd

56 56 The Development of Preschool Children s Views About Conflict Resolution With Peers : Diversity of changes from five-year-olds to six-year-olds Y

- 原著 1 Characteristics of one s view of Japanese society in university students: Development of the one s view of society scale and examination of val

パーソナリティ研究 2005 第14巻 第1号 1–16

公的・非営利組織の人的資源マネジメント戦略:

Jpn. J. Personality 19(2): (2010)

<30315F985F95B65F90B490852E696E6464>

05_藤田先生_責

‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹

272 11) 12) 1 Barrera 13) 1fl social embeddedness 2fl perceived support 3fl enacted support 3 14) 15) 3 2fl 13) 16;17) 1 14;15;18 21) 2 22;23) 4 24;25

Counterfactual Thinking in Simulated Situations: Failing a job-interview Kaori MASAMOTO Counterfactual thinking: This study investigates counterfactua

地域活性化システム論カリキュラム研究会報告書

【教】⑩山森直人先生【本文】/【教】⑩山森直人先生【本文】

WHO WHO WHO WHO WHO WHO WHO WHO WHO (Aaron Antonovsky, - ) WHO WHO - WHO

Change in Emotional Intelligence through the Process of Learning Autogenic Training Ryuichi Sase Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the

山大紀要13


第51巻 第1・2号 B5/目次



(’Ó)”R

183 学生の情緒的側面の充実と教育成果 CSS JCSS はじめに IR IR IR JCSS 学生の教育評価の意味 PISA

【教】⑤吉井健治先生【本文】/【教】⑤吉井健治先生【本文】

e.g ; Ryan & Deci, ; 2009 indecisive Bacanli, 2006 Bacanli, 2006 ; Cooper, Fuqua, & Hartman, 1984 Gordo

”Лï‰IŠv ŁÐ”RŸ_Ł¶

Jap. J. of Educ. Psychol., 1985, 33, 295 \306 A STUDY ON EGO IDENTITY IN MIDDLE AGE Yuko OKAMOTO The purposes of this study were to clarify the charac

Jpn. J. Personality 22(1): 1-12 (2013)

WHO WHO QOL QOL Aaron Antonovsky - Sense of Coherence: SOC SOC Salus genesis

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1984, Vol. 55, No. 3, Effects of self-disclosure on interpersonal attraction Masahiko Nakamura (Department

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

仏大 社会学部論集47号(P)/6.山口

02総福研-06_辻.indd

Table 1 Means and standard deviations of topic familiarity for the topics used in the study Note. standard deviations are in parenthesis.

081116ヨコ/妹尾江里子 199号

社会関係資本と外国人に対する寛容さに関する研究―JGSS-2008 の分析から―

Rubin Rubin

udc-3.dvi

Jpn. J. Personality 19(2): (2010)

220 28;29) 30 35) 26;27) % 8.0% 9 36) 8) 14) 37) O O 13 2 E S % % 2 6 1fl 2fl 3fl 3 4

04森本.indd

udc-2.dvi

The Journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Administration and Policies Vol 12, No 1, pp 49 59, 2008 資料 看護師におけるメンタリングとキャリア結果の関連 Relationship between M

ハイコミットメントモデルの有効性についての考察 

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology


56 pp , 2005 * ******* *** ** CA CAMA

J. Jpn. Acad. Nurs. Sci., Vol.25, No.1, pp.13-22, 2005 Decision Making under the Uncertainty; Process of Decision from Diagnosis to Preventive- Operat

J53-01

untitled


56



◎【教】⑯梅津正美先生【本文】/【教】⑯梅津正美先生【本文】

理学療法検査技術習得に向けた客観的臨床能力試験(OSCE)の試行

, 2001, 1, Japanese Journal of Interpersonal and Social Psychology, 2001, No. 1, ) Aron, Dutton, Aron, & Iverson Sprecher


SEJulyMs更新V7

Transcription:

14 49642017 6 49 Planned Happenstance 1 Measuring Career Skills for Utilized Circumstances referred to the Planned Happenstance Theory Masanori URAKAMI, Mutsumi TAKATSUNA, Hideharu SUGIMOTO, Yumiko YAZAKI This study attempted to develop a scale to measure career skills that utilize everyday circumstances, and determine its reliability and validity. A scale measuring interpersonal ties skill that increase the social connectedness was added to five skills based upon the planned happenstance theory (Mitchell et al., 1999). Undergraduate students participated in a questionnaire study. Finally, 6 subscales were identified: curiosity, persistence, flexibility, optimism, start/initiative (risk taking), and interpersonal ties. This scale had high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. While the scale was positively correlated with time perspective and the positive aspects of ambiguity tolerance, it was negatively correlated with the negative aspects of ambiguity tolerance. High scores mostly indicate participation in off-campus activities and part-time employment. In addition, low skills related with low participation for various activities and less utilization of the surrounding environment. These results suggested that the scale demonstrated substantial validity. 20062015 2014 Mitchell, Levin, Krumboltz1999 Planned Happenstance

50 Planned Happenstance 19 20 Parsons Brown Brooks, 1996 1991 2007 Gelatt Gelatt 1962 Gelatt, 19621989 1962 positive uncertainty nonrational Gelatt, 1989; 2013 Mitchell et al.1999 Mitchell 2 Mitchell et al.1999 Mitchell et al.1999

51 Mitchell et al.1999 5 5 1curiosity 2persistence3flexibility4optimism 5risk taking 5 2005; 2006 Kim, Jang, Jung, Lee, Puig, Lee2014 5 5 Mitchell et al.1999 Krumboltz Levin2004/2005 5 Mitchell et al.1999 5 2 Mitchell et al.1999 5 Granovetter1973 the strength of weak ties

52 Planned Happenstance 2007 Mitchell et al.1999 Mitchell et al.1999 5 1 curiosity 2persistence 3flexibility 4optimism 5 risk taking startinitiative 6tie 6 6 CPFOST CPFOST 7 2014 4 3 24 CPFOST 8 11 10 59 CPFOST 1 2003201119942003 2005 4

53 7 SPSSver. 22 R3.0.2 175 156 331 19.42 SD 1.25 CPFOST 129 43 4 1.58 CPFOST 6 1 1 2 1 1 1 7 8 CPFOST Table 1 1 12 6 6 6 6 6 CPFOST 5 CPFOST CPFOST CPFOST

54 Planned Happenstance CPFOST CPFOST 2 CPFOST 43 7 2014 9 11 6 1 506 200 2 1 CPFOST CPFOST 1 CPFOST 43 7 1994 4 18 2007 5 26

55 19 Table 5 5 CPFOST CPFOST 837 CPFOST 387 450 19.55 SD 1.18 1 1.8 CPFOST 4 Table 1 1 x 2 1375.21 df 390, p.01gfi.90agfi.88cfi.92rmsea.06aic77484.26 x 2 1555.69 df 399, p.01gfi.89agfi.87 CFI.90RMSEA.06AIC77646.75 Table 1 Table 1 141 87 3 2.64.75 CPFOST Table 2 CPFOST 6 4.60 SD 1.04 4.42 SD 0.92 780.12.56 t p.05 d 0.18 4.86 SD 1.04 4.70 SD 1.03 t813.22.29 p.05 d 0.15 203 124 79

56 Planned Happenstance Table 1CPFOST.79 r.64 SD 4 4.75 1.20.62 16 4.53 1.47.58 24 5.10 1.29.62 29 4.62 1.38.66 34 4.49 1.41.80 4.70 0.99 1 5.69 1.16 10 4.84 1.36 40 4.88 1.45.85 r.72 5 4.71 1.38.77 11 4.55 1.43.73 20 4.58 1.40.72 25 4.73 1.39.84 41 4.29 1.35.63 4.57 1.11 2 4.88 1.33 35 4.78 1.25.80 r.68 6 4.64 1.29.70 17 4.26 1.31.71 26 4.53 1.37.53 31 4.61 1.20.65 36 4.47 1.38.75 4.50 0.98 12 5.00 1.31 42 4.43 1.39.84 r.70 7 4.88 1.38.71 13 4.56 1.30.71 18 4.57 1.33.76 21 4.68 1.39.75 37 4.26 1.64.68 4.59 1.11 27 4.34 1.60 32 4.03 1.47.82 r.64 14 4.83 1.38.64 19 4.89 1.42.66 22 4.85 1.45.67 38 4.58 1.26.72 43 4.71 1.32.72 4.77 1.04 8 4.42 1.40 33 4.53 1.36.81 r.75 3 3.58 1.71.71 9 4.24 1.64.69 15 3.84 1.71.60 28 4.31 1.51.73 39 4.33 1.62.65 4.06 1.23 23 4.64 1.71 30 4.34 1.60

57 Table 2.45.66.61.69.65.56.61.57.59.35.84.73.70.66.53.75.67.85.72.50.88.71.83.87.54.81.43.67.59.67 19.34 SD 1.25CPFOST CPFOST 1994 4 Table 3.7 1994 2.7 4 CPFOST Table 3 CPFOST Table 3 SD 2.61 2.69 3.25 3.33 0.98 0.80 0.87 0.97.84.65.75.70.21.33.15.10.31.32.12.09.35.47.15.19.32.54.23.34.32.40.14.18.29.43.12.12 4.31 4.15 3.99 4.39 3.85 0.71 0.80 0.78 0.71 1.12.76.72.65.71.80.60.22.22.09.04.31.03.04.18.20.49.29.20.09.08.45.28.17.02.15.53.15.19.04.17.36.19.08.04.16 p.05, p.01

58 Planned Happenstance 2007 5.7 2007.742013.70 Table 3 CPFOST Table 3 CPFOST CPFOST 1 CPFOST 837 Table 4 CPFOST 369 169 200 19.83 SD 1.17 Table 4 SD SD t df d SD SD t df d 4.65 4.54 4.48 4.56 4.75 4.01 0.99 1.12 0.99 1.12 1.05 1.23 5.09 4.81 4.69 4.82 4.98 4.47 0.88 0.93 0.88 0.91 0.89 1.08 4.49 2.54 2.26 2.56 2.38 3.82 128.7 133.5 128.8 135.4 131.7 129.4 0.45 0.25 0.21 0.24 0.22 0.38 4.47 4.43 4.26 4.30 4.51 3.74 1.02 1.16 1.01 1.11 1.00 1.17 4.77 4.62 4.58 4.69 4.86 4.17 0.97 1.09 0.96 1.09 1.04 1.23 3.66 2.05 3.99 4.36 4.27 4.47 330.7 326.5 327.7 337.5 356.1 359.6 0.31 0.17 0.33 0.36 0.34 0.35.04.06.08.05.09.06 734 96 204 631 616 p.05, p.01

59 Table 5 1 62 6.751.741.140.95 2 2 3 2 Table 5 10 1 2.50.79.81 2.12 SD 0.75 2.56 SD 0.85 CPFOST Table 6 CPFOST CPFOST Mitchell et al.1999 CPFOST Mitchell et al.1999

60 Planned Happenstance Table 5 SD F1 F2 1.94 0.97.89.25 2.18 1.15.73.16 1.64 1.01.66.08 2.04 1.10.59.10 2.46 1.11.55.04 2.42 1.10.52.11 2.71 1.11.49.24 2.31 1.08.47.33 2.54 1.09.46.22 2.79 1.22.41.10 2.46 1.01.37.15 2.03 1.09.36.18 2.47 1.10.07.73 2.68 1.16.10.70 2.37 1.10.11.66 2.48 1.09.05.60 2.78 1.14.06.59 2.42 1.16.25.41 2.33 1.13.23.36 6 5 1

61 Table 6.18.33.25.19.16.18.43.47.34.41.37.37.42 5 CPFOST 20152015 2013 CPFOST 3

62 Planned Happenstance 2 Mitchell et al.1999 2 1 2 2006 20152015 2014 2005 1 56 87 93. Brown, D Brooks, L. (1996), Introduction to theories of career choice and development. In D. Brown L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development: Applying contemporary theories to practice (3rd ed.) (pp. 1 30). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass. 1991.

63 2015 15 21 31. Gelatt, H. B. (1962). Decision-making: A conceptual frame of reference for counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 9, 240 245. Gelatt, H. B. (1989). Positive uncertainty: A new decision-making framework for counseling. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 252256. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78, 13601380. 2011 19 233 244. Kim, B., Jang, S. H., Jung, S. H., Lee, B. H., Puig, A Lee, S. M. (2014). A moderated mediation model of planned happenstance skills, career engagement, career decision self-efficacy, and career decision certainty. The Career Development Quarterly, 62, 5669. 2015 86 150 159. Krumboltz, J. D., Levin, A. S. (2005).. (Krumboltz, J. D., Levin, A. S. (2004). Luck is no accident. CA: Impact Publishers.) 2003TGP FGA 12 110 111. Mitchell, K. E., Levin, A. S., Krumboltz, J. D. (1999). Planned happenstance: Constructing unexpected career opportunities. Journal of Counseling and Development, 77, 115 124. 2007 15 183 194. 2013 123 103 112. 2006 54 211 221. 2007 50 384 401 1994 65 54 60. 2015 15 507 516. 2006 2014Planned Happenstance 6SC 36 45 46. 2005 10 2014PGIS-II 85 178 187. 2015 53 1 12. 1994 36 327. 2013pp. 290291. 20031 12 116 117.

64 Planned Happenstance 1 36 2014 6SC CPFOST 2