\S 1. $g$ $n$ $\{0\}=$ $\subset\alpha\subset\cdots\subset r_{n-1}\subset$ $=r,$ $\dim_{c}r_{j}=j(0\leq j\leq n)$ $A_{j+1}/A_{j}(0\leq j\leq n-1)$ $\la

Similar documents
CAPELLI (T\^o $\mathrm{r}\mathrm{u}$ UMEDA) MATHEMATICS, KYOTO UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT $\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}$ $0$:, Cape i,.,.,,,,.,,,.

Λ (Kyo Nishiyama) 1 p q r ( determinantal variety) n n r Kostant ( Rallis, Steinberg ) D 1980 Borho-Brylinski Vogan Springer theta theta theta

compact compact Hermann compact Hermite ( - ) Hermann Hermann ( ) compact Hermite Lagrange compact Hermite ( ) a, Σ a {0} a 3 1

数理解析研究所講究録 第1908巻

可約概均質ベクトル空間の$b$-関数と一般Verma加群

(Masatake MORI) 1., $I= \int_{-1}^{1}\frac{dx}{\mathrm{r}_{2-x})(1-\mathcal{i}1}.$ (1.1) $\overline{(2-x)(1-\mathcal{i})^{1}/4(1

0. I II I II (1) linear type: GL( ), Sp( ), O( ), (2) loop type: loop current Kac-Moody affine, hyperbolic (3) diffeo t

k + (1/2) S k+(1/2) (Γ 0 (N)) N p Hecke T k+(1/2) (p 2 ) S k+1/2 (Γ 0 (N)) M > 0 2k, M S 2k (Γ 0 (M)) Hecke T 2k (p) (p M) 1.1 ( ). k 2 M N M N f S k+

cubic zeta 1ifting (Tomoyoshi IBUKIYAMA) (Department of Math., Graduate School of Sci., Osaka Univ. 1 \Re $\Phi^{\mathrm{J}}$ 1



日本内科学会雑誌第98巻第3号

単純パラエルミート対称空間の等長変換群について (新しい変換群論とその周辺)

一般演題(ポスター)

第86回日本感染症学会総会学術集会後抄録(II)

$\mathrm{s}$ DE ( Kenta Kobayashi ), (Hisashi Okamoto) (Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto Univ.) (Jinghui Zhu)

A MATLAB Toolbox for Parametric Rob TitleDesign based on symbolic computatio Design of Algorithms, Implementatio Author(s) 坂部, 啓 ; 屋並, 仁史 ; 穴井, 宏和 ; 原

105 $\cdot$, $c_{0},$ $c_{1},$ $c_{2}$, $a_{0},$ $a_{1}$, $\cdot$ $a_{2}$,,,,,, $f(z)=a_{0}+a_{1}z+a_{2}z^{2}+\cdots$ (16) $z=\emptyset(w)=b_{1}w+b_{2

第85 回日本感染症学会総会学術集会後抄録(I)

, CH n. CH n, CP n,,,., CH n,,. RH n ( Cartan )., CH n., RH n CH n,,., RH n, CH n., RH n ( ), CH n ( 1.1 (v), (vi) )., RH n,, CH n,., CH n,. 1.2, CH n

. Mac Lane [ML98]. 1 2 (strict monoidal category) S 1 R 3 A S 1 [0, 1] C 2 C End C (1) C 4 1 U q (sl 2 ) Drinfeld double. 6 2

Archimedean Spiral 1, ( ) Archimedean Spiral Archimedean Spiral ( $\mathrm{b}.\mathrm{c}$ ) 1 P $P$ 1) Spiral S

2.1 H f 3, SL(2, Z) Γ k (1) f H (2) γ Γ f k γ = f (3) f Γ \H cusp γ SL(2, Z) f k γ Fourier f k γ = a γ (n)e 2πinz/N n=0 (3) γ SL(2, Z) a γ (0) = 0 f c

( ) 1., ([SU] ): F K k., Z p -, (cf. [Iw2], [Iw3], [Iw6]). K F F/K Z p - k /k., Weil., K., K F F p- ( 4.1).,, Z p -,., Weil..,,. Weil., F, F projectiv

Siegel Hecke 1 Siege Hecke L L Fourier Dirichlet Hecke Euler L Euler Fourier Hecke [Fr] Andrianov [An2] Hecke Satake L van der Geer ([vg]) L [Na1] [Yo

dプログラム_1

診療ガイドライン外来編2014(A4)/FUJGG2014‐01(大扉)

( ) Lemma 2.2. X ultra filter (1) X = X 1 X 2 X 1 X 2 (2) X = X 1 X 2 X 3... X N X 1, X 2,..., X N (3) disjoint union X j Definition 2.3. X ultra filt

1.2 (Kleppe, cf. [6]). C S 3 P 3 3 S 3. χ(p 3, I C (3)) 1 C, C P 3 ( ) 3 S 3( S 3 S 3 ). V 3 del Pezzo (cf. 2.1), S V, del Pezzo 1.1, V 3 del Pe

平成 15 年度 ( 第 25 回 ) 数学入門公開講座テキスト ( 京都大学数理解析研究所, 平成 ~8 15 月年 78 日開催月 4 日 ) X 2 = 1 ( ) f 1 (X 1,..., X n ) = 0,..., f r (X 1,..., X n ) = 0 X = (

$\bullet$ A Distributed Sorting Algorithm on a Line Network: Adopting the Viewpoint of Sequential and Parallel Sorting Atsushi SASA

放射線専門医認定試験(2009・20回)/HOHS‐01(基礎一次)

$\overline{\circ\lambda_{\vec{a},q}^{\lambda}}f$ $\mathrm{o}$ (Gauge Tetsuo Tsuchida 1. $\text{ }..\cdot$ $\Omega\subset \mathrm{r}^

離散ラプラス作用素の反復力学系による蝶の翅紋様の実現とこれに基づく進化モデルの構成 (第7回生物数学の理論とその応用)

36

[2, 3, 4, 5] * C s (a m k (symmetry operation E m[ 1(a ] σ m σ (symmetry element E σ {E, σ} C s 32 ( ( =, 2 =, (3 0 1 v = x 1 1 +

0.,,., m Euclid m m. 2.., M., M R 2 ψ. ψ,, R 2 M.,, (x 1 (),, x m ()) R m. 2 M, R f. M (x 1,, x m ), f (x 1,, x m ) f(x 1,, x m ). f ( ). x i : M R.,,

日本糖尿病学会誌第58巻第1号

数理解析研究所講究録 第1977巻

44 $d^{k}$ $\alpha^{k}$ $k,$ $k+1$ k $k+1$ dk $d^{k}=- \frac{1}{h^{k}}\nabla f(x)k$ (2) $H^{k}$ Hesse k $\nabla^{2}f(x^{k})$ $ff^{k+1}=h^{k}+\triangle

1980年代半ば,米国中西部のモデル 理論,そして未来-モデル理論賛歌

チュートリアル:ノンパラメトリックベイズ

四変数基本対称式の解放

330

Mazur [Ma1] Schlessinger [Sch] [SL] [Ma1] [Ma1] [Ma2] Galois [] 17 R m R R R M End R M) M R ut R M) M R R G R[G] R G Sets 1 Λ Noether Λ k Λ m Λ k C Λ

数理解析研究所講究録 第1921巻

R R P N (C) 7 C Riemann R K ( ) C R C K 8 (R ) R C K 9 Riemann /C /C Riemann 10 C k 11 k C/k 12 Riemann k Riemann C/k k(c)/k R k F q Riemann 15


Transcription:

, 2000 pp.19-32 1950 Mackey Dixmier = 50 Pukanzsky, Duflo, Pedersen $\text{}$ 60 Kirillov Dixmier = Mackey 62 Kirillov Auslander-Kostant 1 Pukanzsky 1 70 $ $) $-$ = = Corwin, Pedersen - $-$ 19

\S 1. $g$ $n$ $\{0\}=$ $\subset\alpha\subset\cdots\subset r_{n-1}\subset$ $=r,$ $\dim_{c}r_{j}=j(0\leq j\leq n)$ $A_{j+1}/A_{j}(0\leq j\leq n-1)$ $\lambda_{j}$ 1. $\lambda_{j}(0\leq j\leq n-1)$ $ $\Phi$ $g$ $-$ 1. : $g=\langle T,P,Q\rangle_{R};[T,P$ $=-Q,$ $[T,Q]=P$ 2. Diamond algebra : $\infty=\langle T,P,Q,Z\rangle_{R}$ ; $[T,P]=-Q,$ $[T,Q]=P,$ $[P,Q]=Z$ 2. $G$ () $g$ $exp:oarrow G$ $G$ Ll. (Dixmier [13], Saito [42]) $G$ $\Phi$ $-$ (1) $\sim(6)$ (1) $G$ {2) $exp:\iotaarrow G$ (3) $exp:aarrow G$ (4) (5) $r$ $\lambda$ A $X\ovalbox{\ttREJECT}\mapsto\lambda(XX1+i\alpha)$ $(\alpha\in \mathbb{r})$ $i=\sqrt{-1}$ (6) $p$ & $-$ $G$ $H$ $G$ $\Delta_{G}$ $H$ $\Delta_{H,G}=\Delta_{H}/\Delta_{G}$ $G$ $\psi:garrow \mathbb{c}$ $\psi(gh)=\delta_{h,g}(h)\psi(g)(g\in G, h\in H)$ 20

\mathfrak{n}^{\ell}$ $mdh$ $G-$ $v_{g,h}$ = $v_{g.h}(\psi)=\oint_{g}l^{h}\psi(g)dv_{g,h}(g)$ $H$ $P$ $P$ $G$ $F$ $F(gh)=\Delta_{HG}^{1}p,(h)p(h)^{-1}(F(g))(g\in G, h\in H)$ $mod H$ $ P =( v_{g,h}( F ^{2}))^{1/2}=(\oint_{G H} F(g) \zeta dv_{g,h}(g))^{\psi 2}$ $G$ $V_{G,H}$ $G$ $G$ $P$ $ind_{g}^{hp}$ 1 \S 2. Kirillov [27] t) - $g$ $G=\exp \mathfrak{g}$ $G$ $G$ $\hat{g}$ $G$ $g^{*}$ = $g$ $G$ $\mathfrak{g}^{*}$ 1)- () $g\in G,$ $P\in \mathfrak{g}^{*}$ $\hat{g}$ $l\in \mathfrak{g}^{*}$ $(g\cdot l)(x)=l(g^{-1}\cdot X)(\forall X\in \mathfrak{g})$ $G$ $\Phi^{*}/G$ 4 = $B_{\ell}$ $g$ $\mathfrak{n}$ $\mathfrak{n}\subset $\mathfrak{n}$ $\Leftrightarrow \mathfrak{n}=\mathfrak{n}^{\ell}\leftrightarrow u\subset \mathfrak{n}^{\ell}$ $B_{\ell}(X,Y)=\ell([X.Y])(X,Y\in o)$ $\mathfrak{n}^{1}=\{x\in p:b_{\ell}(x,y)=0, \forall Y\in \mathfrak{n}\}$ $P$ $\mathfrak{n}$ $2\dim \mathfrak{n}=\dim A^{+\dim}A^{l}$ $\hat{g}$ $\ell$ 3. $\mathfrak{g}$ $\mathfrak{g}$ )- $0$ $\ell\in g^{*}$ $0$ polarization $\mathfrak{g}$ $S(\ell,\mathfrak{g})$ $M(\ell,\mathfrak{g})$ $l\in J^{s}$ $p$ A polarization $ff\in S(\ell,\mathfrak{g})$ $\chi_{\ell}(\exp X)=e^{r(X\rangle}(X\in 0)$ $G$ $H=\exp 0$ $G$ \ell,o, $G$ ) $=ind_{h}^{g}\chi_{\ell}$ $p(p,0,g)$ $O\in S(\ell,\mathfrak{g})$ $I(P,\mathfrak{g})$ $I(P,\mathfrak{g})$ 21 Pukanszky

2.1. (Pukanszky [40]) $H=\exp 0$ $\ell\in A^{s},$ $0\in S(\ell,\mathfrak{g})$ (1) $\sim(3)$ (1) $H$.\ell =\ell +01 $0^{\perp}=\{\lambda\in \mathfrak{g}^{*} : \lambda 1_{0}=0\}_{\circ}$ (2) $\phi\in M(\ell,\mathfrak{g})$ $\ell+0^{\perp}\subset G\cdot\ell$ (3) $\lambda\in 0^{\perp}$ $O\in M(\ell+\lambda,g)$ 1. $G^{-}\text{_{}}$ $M(P,\mathfrak{g})$ Pukanszky 2.1. (Bemmat [6], Pukanszky [40], Takenouchi [43]) $l\in n^{*},$ $0\in S(\ell,g)$ (1 ) $I(\ell,g)\neq\otimes$ (2) $O\in 1(\ell,g)\Leftrightarrow 0$ Pukanszky (3) $0_{1},0_{z}\in I(P,\mathfrak{g})$ \ell,y,, $G$ ) $\cong$ (4) (1) (3) $\hat{p}=\hat{p}_{g}$ (5) $\ell_{1},$ ) $\Theta_{G}$ : $\ell_{2}\in g^{*}$ $\text{}\ell_{1}$ : $g^{*}/garrow\hat{g}$ $\mathfrak{g}^{*}arrow\hat{g}$ \ell,y2 $G$ ) () $\hat{p}$ ) ) $=\hat{\mu}p_{2}$ $\Leftrightarrow G\cdot P_{1}=G\cdot\ell_{2}$ (Kirillov $0^{*}/G$ Fell $\hat{g}$ 2.2. (Ludwig [28]) $e_{g}$ : $\mathfrak{g}^{*}/garrow\hat{g}$ \S 3. Frobenius $G=\exp\Phi$ $H=\exp 0$ $\chi$ $\tau=ind_{h}^{g}\chi$ $f\in $O\in S(f,g)$ $\chi=\chi_{f}$ \mathfrak{g}^{*}$ Pukanszky $\mathfrak{g}^{*}$ G $H-$ $\Gamma_{\tau}$ $\tilde{\mu}$ $0^{*}$ $\Gamma_{\tau}=f+O^{\perp}$ Kirillov $\mu=(\hat{p}_{g})_{*}(\tilde{\mu})$ $\pi\in\hat{g}$ $\Omega(\pi)$ $\Omega(\pi)=(\hat{p}_{G})^{-1}(\pi)_{\text{}}\Gamma_{\tau}\cap\Omega(\pi)$ $H$ $m(\pi)$ $\hat{g}$ $\mu$ $m(\pi)$ 22

$\hat{\mu}$ 3.1. (cf. [18]) $\tau\cong\int_{\hat{g}}^{\oplus}m(\pi)\pi d\mu(\pi)$ $K=\exp f$ $G$ $\pi\in\hat{g}$ $G-$ $\Omega(\pi)$ $\tilde{\gamma}=\tilde{\gamma}_{\pi}$ $\Omega(\pi)$ $\mathfrak{g}^{*}$ $p:g^{*}arrow f^{*}$ $\gamma=(\hat{p}_{k}\circ p)_{*}(\tilde{\gamma})$ $\sigma\in\hat{k}$ $0$) $(\sigma)=(\hat{p}_{k})^{-1}(\sigma)\subset 9^{*}$ $\Omega(\pi)\cap p^{-1}(ox\sigma))$ $K-$ $n_{\pi}(\sigma)$ $\hat{k}$ $\gamma$ $n_{\pi}(\sigma)$ $\pi\in\hat{g}$ $K$ $\pi _{K}$ 3.2. (cf. [19]) $\pi 1_{K}$ $\cong\int_{\hat{k}}^{\oplus}n_{\pi}(\sigma)d\gamma(\sigma)$ $\pi_{j}(j=1,2)$ $G$ 2 - $\pi_{1}\cross\pi_{2}$ $G\cross G$ $(\Omega(\pi_{1}), = $\pi_{1}\cross\pi_{2}$ $\pi_{1}\otimes\pi_{2}$ \Omega(\pi_{2}))\subset \mathfrak{g}^{*}\oplus \mathfrak{g}^{*}$ $G$ $G\cross G$ $\pi_{1}$ $\pi_{2}$ 1. $p:\mathfrak{g}^{*}\oplus \mathfrak{g}^{*}arrow g^{*}$ $\gamma=(\hat{p}_{g}\circ p)_{*}(\tilde{\gamma}_{\pi_{1}\cross\pi_{2}})$ $\pi\in\hat{g}$ $(\Omega(\pi_{1}),\Omega(\pi_{2}))\cap p^{-1}(\omega(\pi))$ $G$ $m(\pi)$ $\pi_{1}\otimes\pi_{2}\cong\int_{\hat{g}}^{\oplus}m(\pi)\pi d\gamma(\pi)$ $\sigma\in\hat{k}$ 3.1 $ind_{k}^{g}\sigma$ $g^{*}$ $p^{-1}(ox\sigma))$ $0$) $(\sigma)$ $K$ $\hat{\mu}$ $\hat{g}$ $\mu$ ind $GH\sigma$ $g^{*}$ $\tilde{\mu}$ $\mu=(\hat{p}_{g})_{*}(\tilde{\mu})$ 3.2 $\hat{g}\ni\pi$ $\vdash\rightarrow n_{\pi}(\sigma)$ 3.3. (cf. [19]) $ind_{h}^{g}\sigma\equiv\int_{\hat{g}}^{\oplus}n_{\pi}(\sigma)\pi d\mu(\pi)$ 32 33 2. Frobenius $G=\exp \mathfrak{g}$ 3.1 $\tau=ind_{h}^{g}\chi_{f}$ 23

$\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{arrow}$ \S 4. $G$ $\pi$ () $\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}$ $G\ni g\mapsto\pi(g)v\in$ $C^{\infty}$. $v\in$ $\pi \text{}c^{\infty}-$ $g$ $d\pi$ : $d \pi(x)v=\frac{d}{dt}\pi(\exp(tx))v[_{=0}(x\in A, v\in\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{\infty})$ $\pi$ $d\pi$ A $\mathscr{u}(p)$ $\{X_{j}\}_{1\leq j\leq n}$ $g$ $\mathfrak{p}_{\pi}(x^{a})\mathcal{v} = \oint\pi(x)^{\alpha_{1}}\cdots d4x_{n})^{\alpha_{*}}v t\alpha=(\alpha_{1},\ldots,\alpha_{n})\in \mathbb{z}_{+}^{n},$ $\mathbb{z}_{+}=\{0\}\cup N$ $\pi$ = $\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{arrow}$ $\langle a,b\rangle$ $a\in\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{n}^{b$ $b\in\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{\mp\infty}$ $G$ A $G$ $C^{\infty}$ (G) $\phi\in$ G) \mbox{\boldmath $\pi$}(\mbox{\boldmath $\phi$}) $\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{n}^{arrow}\subset$ $-j$ I/ $dg$ $\pi(\phi)$ $G$ $\pi(\phi)=\int_{g}\phi(g)\pi(g)dg$ $[7]_{\text{}}[8]_{\text{}}$ [38] $G=\exp$ $ $\pi$ 2.1 $\ell\in g^{*}$ $r$ polarization $\mathfrak{n}$ $\pi$ $\mu\ell,h,g$) $h=f_{0}\subset f_{1}\subset\cdots\subset f_{d}=\mathfrak{g}\dim f_{j+1}/f_{j}=1(0\leq j\leq d-1)$ $\tilde{x}_{j}\in f_{j+1}\backslash f_{j}(0\leq j\leq d-1)$ $\Phi:\mathbb{R}^{d}\cross B\ni(t,b)I\Rightarrow(\prod_{j=d}^{1}\exp(t_{j}X_{j}))b\in G,$ $C=(t_{1},\ldots,t_{d}),$ $B=\exp b$ $\Phi$ $\Phi$ $G/H$ = $\pi$ $L^{2}(\mathbb{R}^{d})$ $i$) $-$ 4.1. $d\pi(\mathscr{u}(a))$ (cf. [11]) (Rd) = $\pi$ = $G$ 24

$a_{\pi}^{k}$ : j $K$ $\chi:karrow \mathbb{c}^{*}$ $(\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{arrow})^{\kappa_{x} =\{a\in\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{arrow} : \pi(k)a=\chi(k)a, \forall k\in K\}$ $\tau=ind_{h}^{g}\chi_{f}$ $G$ $e$ $6_{\tau}\in(\ovalbox{\ttREJECT}_{\tau}^{\infty})^{H,\chi_{f}$ $6_{\tau}$ $\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{\infty}\ni\psiarrow\overline{\psi(e)}\in \mathbb{c}$ : ( 3.1) $m(\pi)$ Penney [37] = $6_{\tau}$ : $6_{\tau}= \int_{\hat{g}}^{\oplus}\sum_{k=1}^{m(\pi)}a_{\pi}^{k}d\mu(\pi)_{\text{}}$ (41) $a_{\pi}^{k}\in(\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{r)^{h,\chi_{f}}(1\leq k\leq m(\pi))$ $H$ $1\backslash$ $\phi\in$ G) $dh$ $\phi_{h}^{f}\in $\phi_{h}^{f}(g)=\int_{h}\phi(gh)\chi_{f}(h)dh(g\in G)$ \text{_{}\tau}^{\infty}$ $\tau(\phi)$ $G$ $J\backslash$-$js$ $dg_{\text{}}$ $v_{g,h}$ $v_{g,h}=dg/dh$ $\phi\in \mathfrak{u}(g)$ $\phi_{h}^{f}(e)=\langle\tau(\phi)6_{\tau},6_{\tau}\rangle$ (4-1) $\phi_{h}^{f}(e)=\int_{\hat{g}}\sum_{k=1}^{m(\pi)}\langle\pi(\phi)a_{\pi}^{k},a_{\pi}^{k}\rangle d\mu(\pi)$ (4-2) = $a_{\pi}^{k}$ (4-1) (4-2) $\pi\in\hat{g}$ $l\in\omega(\pi)$ polarisation $u\in M(\ell,\mathfrak{g})$ \ell, $u$, $G$ ) 3.1 $\Gamma_{\tau}\cap\Omega(\pi)$ $g_{k}\in G$ $H$ $C_{1},$ $\ldots,$ $C_{m(\pi)}$ $1\leq k\leq m(\pi)$ $g_{k}\cdot\ell\in C_{k}$ 4.2. (cf. [17]) $H/H\cap g_{k}bg_{k}^{-1}$ $(\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{arrow})^{h,\chi_{f}$ $d_{k}h$ $\ovalbox{\ttreject}_{\pi}^{\infty}\ni\psiarrow\int_{h/h\cap g,bg_{\overline{t}^{1}}\overline{\psi(hg_{k})\chi_{f}(h)}d_{k}\dot{h}(1\leq k\leq m(\pi))$ $m(\pi)$ == (4-2) 2. ( 3.1) $m(\pi)$ = (4-1) (cf. [20]. [33]) (cf. [31) Lipsman = = 25

(cf. $[12]_{\text{}}[\mathfrak{B}]_{\text{}}$ [30]) \S 5. $H$ $\chi_{f}$ $G/H$. $--$. $--$ $G-$ $D_{\tau}(G/H)$ $0$ $\{Y_{j}\}_{1\leq j\leq d}(d=\dim 0)$ (g) $= \sum_{j1}^{\text{}}\mathbb{c}(y_{j}+if(y_{j}))$ (g) $\mathscr{u}(p)\mathfrak{n}_{\tau}$ $\mathscr{u}(g,\tau)=$ { $A\in\%(\mathfrak{g}):[A,Y]\in u(a)\mathfrak{n}_{\tau}$ fy $\in 0$ } $\mathscr{u}($ $G$ D\tau (G/ $\mathscr{u}(g,\tau)/\mathscr{u}(a)0_{\tau}$ D\tau (G/ Corwin-Greenleaf [10] 5.1. (cf. [101) ( 3.1) D\tau (G/ 1. () \Leftrightarrow D\tau (G/ 2. () D\tau (G/ 1 $H-$ $C[\Gamma_{\tau}]^{H}$ 3. 1 Duflo [16] Corwin-Greenleaf [10] 2 $\phi\in$ $G$ ) (4-2) $\phi_{h}^{f}(g)=\int_{\hat{g}}\sum_{k=1}^{m(\pi)}\langle\pi(\phi_{g})a_{\pi}^{k},a_{\pi}^{k}\rangle d\mu(\pi)(\forall g\in G)_{\text{}}$ $\phi_{g}$ $\phi_{g}(x)=\phi(gx)(\forall x\in G)$ $\Phi\langle G$) $X\in \mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g})$ $(X \phi_{h}^{f})(g)=\int_{\hat{g}}\sum_{k=1}^{m(\pi)}\langle\pi(\phi)a_{\pi}^{k},d\pi(\overline{x})a_{\pi}^{k}\rangle d\mu(\pi)_{\text{}}$ (5-1) 5.2. (cf. [22]) $\mu$ $\hat{g}$ $a_{\pi}^{k}(1\leq k\leq m(\pi))$ (g,\tau ) 26

$X\in \mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g},\tau)$ $\Gamma_{\tau}$ $P_{X}$ $\ell\in\gamma_{\tau}$ : $H-$ k $\Omega(\pi)$ $d\pi(\overline{x})a_{\pi}^{k}=\overline{p_{x}(\ell}\nu_{\pi}^{k}$ $P_{X}$ $H$ $\Gamma_{\tau}$ X\in l(g) $P_{X}\equiv 0$ (5-1) $D_{\tau}(G/H)\cong \mathscr{u}(g,\tau)/\mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g})\mathfrak{n}_{\tau}\ni[x]\vdash\rightarrow P_{X}$ 2 (1) $P_{X}$ $\Gamma_{\tau}$ ; (2) (1) (g,\tau )/?X(9) $\mathfrak{n}_{\tau}\ni[x]$ $\vdash\rightarrow P_{X}\in C[\Gamma_{r},]^{H}$ ; 2 2 (cf. $[4]_{\text{}}[21]$ ) = $P_{X}$? 2 \S 6. 1 1 Baklouti $Lion_{\text{}}Magneron_{\text{}}$ Mehdi $\Phi$ $\{0\}=\iota_{0}\subset \mathfrak{g}_{1}\subset\cdots\subset$ -1\subset \sim $=\mathfrak{g}$ $O\cap g_{i}\neq 0\cap \mathfrak{g}_{i-1}$ $i(1\leq i\leq n)$ $\mathcal{j}=\{\dot{q}<\dot{a}<\cdots<i_{d}\}$ $(d=\dim 0)$ $\ovalbox{\ttreject}=\{1,2, \ldots, n\}\backslash \ovalbox{\ttreject}=\{j_{1<j_{2}<\cdots<j_{p}\(p=\dim$ $/O} $f_{0}=\mathfrak{h},$ $f_{r}=\mathfrak{h}+\mathfrak{g}_{j_{r}}(1\leq r\leq p)$ $g$ $0=l_{0}\subset f_{1}\subset\cdots\subset f_{p-1}\subset e_{p}=\mathfrak{g}(\dim t_{r}/f_{r-1}=1)$ $0_{0}=\{0\},$ $0_{S}=0\cap \mathfrak{g}_{i_{s}}(1\leq s\leq d)$ $0$ $\{0\}=0_{0}\subset 0_{1}\subset\cdots\subset 0_{d-1}\subset\phi_{d}=1(\dim 0_{s}=s)$ $\overline{y}_{s}\in 0_{s}\backslash 0_{s-1}(1\leq s\leq d)$ $X_{r}\in f_{r}\backslash f_{r- 1}(1\leq r\leq p)$ $0$ $\mathfrak{g}$ $K_{j}=\exp f_{j}$ $\tau_{j}=ind_{h}^{k_{j}}\chi_{f}(0\leq j\leq p)$ $\mathbb{c}=d_{\tau_{\text{}}}(k_{0}/h)\subset D_{\tau_{1}}(K_{1}/H)\subset\cdots\subset D_{\tau_{p-1}}(K_{p-1}/H)\subset D_{\tau_{p}}(K_{P}/H)=D_{\tau}(G/H)$ = $D_{\tau}(G/H)$ $\tau_{j_{0}- 1}$ = $\tau_{j_{0}}$ = $i_{0}(1\leq j_{0}\leq p)$ 6.1. (cf. Greenleaf [26]. Fujiwan-Lion-Mehdi [24]) 27

$D_{\tau_{j_{0^{-1}}}}(K_{j\text{}-1}/H) \neq D_{\tau_{h}}(K_{j_{0}}\int H)$ $D_{\tau_{j\text{}}}(K_{j_{0}}/H)$ = $V$ $K$ $V$ $0\neq x\in V$ $K-$ $K$ $\Omega\subset V$ 2 = $\Omega+\mathbb{R}x\subset\Omega$ $v\in\omega$ (v+&)\cap \Omega $=\{v\}$ $\Omega$ $x-$ $\tau_{j}(1\leq j\leq p)$ $H-$ $r_{j_{0}}=\{p\in f_{j_{0}}^{*} : \ell 1_{1}=f1_{0}\}$ $K_{j_{0}}$ $H-$ - $f_{j_{0^{-}}1^{-}}$. $\Gamma_{j}$ $H$ 1- ) ( $D_{\tau_{j}}(K_{j}/H$ $=D_{\tau_{j-1}}(K_{j-1}/H)$ = Corwin-Greenleaf [10] ) $n-1$ $G$ $j=n$ $d=\dim\phi=1$ $(\alpha 0)$ $0$ $m$ $ad0-$ $\beta:s(g)arrow \mathscr{u}(p)$ $s(m)$ = $\beta$ (B) $\mathfrak{n}_{\tau}$ = $\dim 0$ $0 =0_{d-1},$ $g =f_{p-1}$, $H=\exp 0,$ $G =\exp p,$ $\tau =ind_{h }^{G}\chi_{f}$, $=ind_{h }^{G }\chi_{f}$ $\Gamma_{\tau}$ $D_{\tau}(G/H)\neq D_{\tau_{p- 1}}(G /H)$ $H-$ $(\mathfrak{g} )^{\perp}-$ $H$ $(\mathfrak{g} )^{\perp}$ $\Gamma_{r }$, $H$ $W\in \mathscr{u}(n,\tau )$ $\mathscr{u}(g )+\mathscr{u}(a)\mathfrak{n}_{\tau }$ $W$ $W\not\in\ (9 )+0\ (9)\text{}$ $ady_{d}$ (g,\tau ) $ady_{d}$ $W$ 6.1. (cf. Baklouti-Fujiwara [2]) $\mathscr{u}(g )+\mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g})\text{}$ $\mathscr{u}(a,\tau )\not\subset \mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g},\tau_{p-,)}$ $\mathscr{u}(g,\tau)$ 28

6.1 $\mathscr{u}(9,\tau )\not\subset \mathscr{u}(p,\tau_{p-1})$ = $l\in\gamma_{\tau}$ $B_{\ell}$ $Y_{d}\in\phi$ $\mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g},\tau )=\mathscr{u}(\phi^{j},\tau_{p-1})$ $0_{d-1}\cap 0^{\ell}\neq 0_{d}\cap$ $\ell\in\gamma_{\tau}$ = $\tau_{p-1}$ == $[Y_{d},W]\in \mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g})\mathfrak{n}_{\tau}$ $T(\Gamma_{\tau})=$ $\{\text{} <m_{2}<\cdots<m_{q}\}$ = $\ell\in\gamma_{\pi}$ $A_{k-1}\cap g^{\ell}\neq$ $\cap$ $k(1\leq k\leq n)$ Corwin-Greenleaf [10] $\Gamma_{\tau}-$ $\{\sigma_{1}, \sigma_{2}, \ldots, \sigma_{q}\}$ $\sigma_{j}(1\leq j\leq q)$ $m_{j}$ $\sim \text{},$ ) $\backslash 1(\text{_{}-1})$ = $\ell\in\gamma_{\tau}$ $d\hat{p}(u\sigma_{j})$ $=m_{k}$ $k(1\leq k\leq q)$ $\mathscr{u}(g)$ $\gamma$ ; 6.2. (Fujiwara-Lion-Magneron-Mehdi) $\mathscr{u}\mathscr{u}(g$,-1 $Y_{d}$ $\gamma(\sigma_{1})$, $)$ $\cdot$.., $\gamma(o_{k})$ $[V,\gamma(\sigma_{j})]\in \mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g})u_{\tau}(1\leq j\leq q)$ $\mathscr{u}(\mathfrak{g})$ $V$ 62 $[W,Y_{d}]\in \mathscr{u}(n)\mathfrak{n}_{\tau}$ $W\in \mathscr{u}(g,\tau)$ 6.2. 3. [1] L. Auslander and B. Kostant, Polarization and unitary representations of solvable Lie groups, Invent. math. 14 (1971), 255-354. [2] A. Baklouti et H. Fujiwara, Op\ erateurs diff\ erentiels associ\ es \ a certaines repr\ esentations unitaires d un groupe de Lie r\ esoluble exponentiel, Pr\ epublication. [3] A. Baklouti and J. Ludwig, The Penney-Fujiwara Plancherel formula for nilpotent Lie groups, J. Maffi. Kyoto Univ. 40 $(20(\mathfrak{P}),$ $1-11$. [4] A. Baklouti and J. Ludwig, Invariant differential operators on certain nilpotent homogeneous 29

spaces, to appear in Monatsheft f\"ur Math.. [5] Y. Benoist, Espaces sym\ etriques exponentiels, Th\ ese de $3e$ cycle, Univ. de Paris VI, 1983. [6] P. Bemat et al., Repr\ esentations des Groupes de Lie R\ esolubles, Dunod, Paris, 1972. [7] P. Bonnet, Transformation de Fourier des distributions de type positif sur un groupe de Lie unimodulaire, J. Func. Anal. 55 (1984), 220-246 [8] P. Cartier, Vecteurs diff\ erentiables dans les repr\ esentations unitaires des groupes de Lie, Lect. Notes in Math. Springer 514 (1975), 20-34. [9] L. Corwin, F. P. Greenleaf and G. Gr\ elaud, Direct integral decomposition and multiplicities for induced representations of nilpotent Lie groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 304 (1987), M9-5. [10] L. Corwin and F. P. Greenleaf, Commutativity of invariant differential operators on nilpotent homogeneous spaces with finite multiplicity, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 45 (1992), 681-748. [11] L. Corwin and F. P. Greenleaf, Representations of Nilpotent Lie Groups and Their Applications, $PaIt$ I, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1989. [12] B. N. Currey, Smooth decomposition of finite multiplicity monomial representation for a class of completely solvable homogeneous spaces, Pacific J. Math. 170 (1995), 429-460. [13] J. Dixmier, L application exponentielle dans les groupes de Lie r\ esolubles, Bull. Soc. Math. France 85 (1957), 113-121. [14] J. Dixmier, Sur les repr\ esentations unitaires des groupes de Lie nilpotents $I\sim VI$ : I, Amer. J. Math. 10 (1958), 160-170: I; V, Bull. Soc. Math. France 85 (1957), 325-388; 87 (1959), 65-79: $m;n;vi$, Canad. J. Math. 10 (1958), 321-348; 11 (1959), 321-344; 12 (1960), 324-352. [15] J. Dixmier, Alg\ ebres Enveloppantes, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1974. [16] M. Duflo, Open problems in representation theory of Lie groups, Conference $on$ $Analysis$ on homogeneous spaces, edited by T. Oshima, 1-5, Katata, Japan, 1986. [17] H. Fujiwara, Repr\ esentations monomiales des groupes de Lie nilpotents, Pacific J. Math. 127 (1987), 329-351. [18] H. Fujiwara, Repr\ esentations monomiales des groupes de Lie r\ esolubles exponentiels, 61-84 dans: M. Duflo, N. Pedersen and M. Vergne $(eds.)$, The orbit methtr in representation theory, Copenhagen, 1988; Birkh\"auser 1990. [19] H. Fujiwara, Sur les restrictions des repr\ esentations unitaires des groupes de Lie r\ esolubles exponentiels, Invent. math. 104 (1991), 647-654. [20] H. Fujiwara, $U$ formule de Plancherel pour les repr\ esentations monomiales des groupes 30

de Lie nilpotents, 140-150 dans: Kawazoe, T. Oshima and S. Sano $T$ $(eds.)$, Representation Theory of Lie Groups and Lie Algebras, Kawaguchiko, Japan, 1990; World Scientific 1992. [21] H. Fujiwara, Sur la conjecture de Corwin-Greenleaf, J. Lie Theory 7 (1997), 121-146. [22] H. Fujiwara, Analyse harmonique pour certaines repr\ esentations induites d un groupe de Lie nilpotent, J. Math. Soc. Japan, 50 (1998), 753-766. [23] H. Fujiwara et S. Yamagami, Certaines repr\ esentations monomiales des groupes de Lie r\ esolubles exponentiels, Adv. St. Pure Math. 14 (1988), 153-190. [24] H. Fujiwara, G. Lion and S. Mehdi, On the commutativity of the algebra of invariant differential operators on certain nilpotent homogeneous spaces, Preprint. [25] F. P. Greenleaf, Harmonic analysis on nilpotent homogeneous spaces, Contemporary Math. 177 (1994), 1-26. [26] F. P. Greenleaf, Geometry of coadjoint orbits and noncommutativity of invariant differential operators on nilpotent homogeneous spaces, Preprint. [27] A. A. Kirillov, Repr\ esentations unitaires des groupes de Lie nilpotents, Uspekhi Math. Nauk. 17 (1962), 57-110. [28] H. Leptin and J. Ludwig, Unitary Representation Theory of Exponential Lie Groups, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, 1994. [29] R. Lipsman, Orbital parameters for induced and restricted representations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 313 (1989), 433-473. [30] R. Lipsman, The Penney-Fujiwara Plancherel formula for abelian symmetric spaces and completely solvable homogeneous spaces, Pacific J. Math. 151 (1991), 265-295. [31] R. Lipsman, Attributes and applications of the Corwin-Greenleaf multiplicity function, Contemporary Math. 177 (1994), 27-46. [32] R. Lipsman, Orbital symmetric spaces and finite multiplicity, J. Func. Anal. 135 (1996), 1-38. [33] R.Lipsman, A unified approach to concrete Plancherel theory of homogeneous spaces, manuscripta math. 94 (1997), 133-149. [34] G. W. Mackey, Induced representations of locally compact groups I ; I, Ann. Math. 55 (1952), 101-139; ibid, 58 (1953), 193-221. [35] G. W. Mackey, Unitary representations of group extensions, Acta Math. 99 (1958), 265-311. [36] N. Pedersen, On the infinitesimal kernel of irreducible representations of nilpotent Lie groups, Bull. Soc. Math. France 112 (1984), 423-467. [37] R. Penney, Abstract Plancherel theorem and a Frobenius reciprocity theorem, J. Func. 31

Anal 18 (197\epsilon, 177-190. $C^{\infty}$ [38] N. S. Poulsen, On -vectors and intertwining bilinear form$s$ for representations of Lie groups, J. Func. Anal. 9 (1972), 87-120. [39] L. Pukanszky, ur $\infty ons$ $s$ les Repr\ esentations de Groupes, Duntr, Paris, 1967. [40] L. Pukanszky, On the theory of exponential groups, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 126 (1967), q- ff. [41] L. Pukanszky, $UnitaI\gamma$ representations of solvable Lie groups, Ann. Sci. Ec. Norm. Sup. 4 (1971), $457-\infty 8$. [42] M. Saito, Sur certains groupes de Lie r\ esolubles I ; I, Sci. Papers of the College of General Educ. Tokyo 7(1957), 1-11; 157-168. [43] O. Takenouchi, Sur la facteur-repr\ esentation d un groupe de Lie r\ esoluble de type (E), Math. J. Okayama Univ. 7(1957), 151-161. 32