Similar documents
1 Flores, D. (009) All you can drink: should we worry about quality? Journal of Regulatory Economics 35(1), Saggi, K., and Vettas, N. (00) On in

中京大学経済学論叢 23 号 2012 年 3 月 審査論文 1 Keywords: JEL Classi cation: L13, L22, L33 1 * *1 Inoue, Kamijo, and Tomaru (2009) Mukherjee and Suestrong

,398 4% 017,

COE-RES Discussion Paper Series Center of Excellence Project The Normative Evaluation and Social Choice of Contemporary Economic Systems Graduate Scho

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

放射線専門医認定試験(2009・20回)/HOHS‐05(基礎二次)

プログラム

GJG160842_O.QXD

_‹Éfi¡

bottleneckjapanese.dvi

_Œkž−01


わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

* *2 Russell et al. (2015) 2

02_加藤氏_4.indd

II

所得税と課税最低限に関する一考察

日本内科学会雑誌第98巻第4号

日本内科学会雑誌第97巻第7号

Jorgenson F, L : L: Inada lim F =, lim F L = k L lim F =, lim F L = 2 L F >, F L > 3 F <, F LL < 4 λ >, λf, L = F λ, λl 5 Y = Const a L a < α < CES? C



untitled

商学 66‐2☆/3.大原

z.prn(Gray)




Blue Ocean Strategy W. Chan Kim A. Mauborgne INSEAD INSEAD Production and Operations Management PhD Value Innovation Kim & Mauborgne, 1997

1 (utility) 1.1 x u(x) x i x j u(x i ) u(x j ) u (x) 0, u (x) 0 u (x) x u(x) (Marginal Utility) 1.2 Cobb-Daglas 2 x 1, x 2 u(x 1, x 2 ) max x 1,x 2 u(

アロー『やってみて学習』から学習:経済成長にとっての教訓 Learning from `Learning by Doing': Lessons for Economic Growth

() n C + n C + n C + + n C n n (3) n C + n C + n C 4 + n C + n C 3 + n C 5 + (5) (6 ) n C + nc + 3 nc n nc n (7 ) n C + nc + 3 nc n nc n (

Z: Q: R: C: sin 6 5 ζ a, b

untitled

9 5 ( α+ ) = (α + ) α (log ) = α d = α C d = log + C C 5. () d = 4 d = C = C = 3 + C 3 () d = d = C = C = 3 + C 3 =

shuron.dvi

研究シリーズ第40号

ohpmain.dvi

01_芦澤成光①.indd

VISPO /表1-4


apli_connection

A

1 (1997) (1997) 1974:Q3 1994:Q3 (i) (ii) ( ) ( ) 1 (iii) ( ( 1999 ) ( ) ( ) 1 ( ) ( 1995,pp ) 1

坪沼

L. S. Abstract. Date: last revised on 9 Feb translated to Japanese by Kazumoto Iguchi. Original papers: Received May 13, L. Onsager and S.

SAMA- SUKU-RU Contents p-adic families of Eisenstein series (modular form) Hecke Eisenstein Eisenstein p T

p *2 DSGEDynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium New Keynesian *2 2

佐野先生投影資料

P1〜14/稲 〃


2 / 24

…i…J…‹†QŁ\1/4

4303ALL-“Å‘I

広報みはま.indd

PDFŠpŒ{Ł¶

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

さくらの個別指導 ( さくら教育研究所 ) 1 φ = φ 1 : φ [ ] a [ ] 1 a : b a b b(a + b) b a 2 a 2 = b(a + b). b 2 ( a b ) 2 = a b a/b X 2 X 1 = 0 a/b > 0 2 a

平成12年度 対日直接投資増加の理由と日本経済にもたらす影響に関する調査 第2章 対日投資と多国籍企業の戦略について


本文/目次(裏白)

untitled

Tricorn

60 Vol. 44 No. 1 2 準市場 化の制度的枠組み: 英国 教育改革法 1988 の例 Education Reform Act a School Performance Tables LEA 4 LEA LEA 3

1 (1996), p. 7 (2006), p (2003), p. 2 p (2003), p. 21 (2008), p. 3 (2003), p. 17 B (2003), p. 28 A, A (2004), p. 17 J, A (2004), p. 9 (p.

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

Abstract Gale-Shapley 2 (1) 2 (2) (1)

Ł\”ƒ-2005

第5章 偏微分方程式の境界値問題

Core Ethics Vol. et al. Schumpeter.hack// NARUTO

, Exchange & Finamce


薄膜結晶成長の基礎4.dvi

Graduate School of Policy and Management, Doshisha University 53 動学的資本税協調と公的資本形成 あらまし Zodrow and Mieszkowski 1986 Wilson 1986 Batina はじめに Zodr

OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

公務員倫理問題への新アプローチ

DGE DGE (1) ( 1

1 1

1

0-Ł\04†E01.pdf

°ÌÁê¿ô³ØII

第90回日本感染症学会学術講演会抄録(I)

2 (March 13, 2010) N Λ a = i,j=1 x i ( d (a) i,j x j ), Λ h = N i,j=1 x i ( d (h) i,j x j ) B a B h B a = N i,j=1 ν i d (a) i,j, B h = x j N i,j=1 ν i

% % No


7 π L int = gψ(x)ψ(x)φ(x) + (7.4) [ ] p ψ N = n (7.5) π (π +,π 0,π ) ψ (σ, σ, σ )ψ ( A) σ τ ( L int = gψψφ g N τ ) N π * ) (7.6) π π = (π, π, π ) π ±

福田/福田

三石貴志.indd

log1-500

平成27年度三菱重工グループ保険 フルガードくん(シニア)

081116ヨコ/妹尾江里子 199号

日本内科学会雑誌第102巻第4号

,, 2. Matlab Simulink 2018 PC Matlab Scilab 2

中小企業の量的成長と質的成長 Size Growth and Capability Growth by Small Firms 髙橋美樹 (Miki Takahashi) 企業の成長には2つの側面があり 従業員数や資本金 売上高でみた量的な側面と イノベーション創出能力あるいは組織能力でみた質的な側


% 32.3 DI DI




商学 63‐3☆/6.山本

Transcription:

10 2016 5 16 1

1 Lin, P. and Saggi, K. (2002) Product differentiation, process R&D, and the nature of market competition. European Economic Review 46(1), 201 211. Manasakis, C., Petrakis, E., and Zikos, V. (2014) Downstream Research Joint Venture with upstream market power. Southern Economic Journal 80(3), 782 802. Arya, A. and Mittendorf, B. (2006) Enhancing vertical efficiency through horizontal licensing. Journal of Regulatory Economics 29(3), 333 342. Clark, D.J. and Riis, C. (1998). Contest success functions: an extension. Economic Theory 11(1), 201 204. 2

3 20 3

2 (Schumpeter, 1975) Research Joint Venture 4

3 1 2 q i c c i γc 2 i /2 c i sc i p = 1 q 1 q 2 π i = (1 q i q j )q i (c c i sc j )q i γ 2 c2 i. c i q i 5

4 FOC ( π i / q i = 0) max q i (1 q i q j )q i (c c i sc j )q i γ 2 c2 i. q i (c i, c j ) = 1 c + 2(c i + sc j ) (c j + sc i ). 3 max c i [ 1 q i (c i, c j ) q j (c i, c j ) ] q i (c i, c j ) (c c i sc j )q i (c i, c j ) γ 2 c2 i. FOC ( π i / c i = 0) c i = 2(1 c)(2 s) 9γ 4 2(1 s)s. 6

5 SOC ( 2 π i / c 2 i < 0) 2 π i c 2 i < 0, 8 8s + 2s2 9γ 9 < 0, 8 8s + 2s 2 9γ < 0. c i s SOC c i s = 2(1 c)(8 8s + 2s2 9γ) (4 + 2s 2s 2 9γ) 2 < 0, 7

6 [1] 1 a i γa 2 i /2 i a i j sa i s 8

7 [2] p i = 1 + a i + sa j q i q j i π i = (1 + a i + sa j q i q j )q i cq i γ 2 a2 i, = (1 q i q j )q i (c a i sa j )q i γ 2 a2 i. 9

8 2 q i (γ c i )q 2 i c i kc 2 i /2 p = 1 q i q j π i = (1 q i q j )q i (γ c i )q 2 i k 2 c2 i, = [ ] 1 (1 + γ c i )q i q j qi k 2 c2 i. 10

9 π i = (1 q i q j )q i (c c i )q i γ 2 c2 i. z i = c c i π i = (1 q i q j )q i z i q i γ 2 (c z i) 2, = (1 q i q j z i )q i γ 2 (c z i) 2. 11

10 Lin and Saggi (2002, EER) [1] R&D R&D R&D R&D 1 2 q i p i d i F(d i ) F (d i ) > 0 F (d i ) > 0 p i = a q i (s 0 d i d j )q j x i x 2 i /2 c 12

11 Lin and Saggi (2002) [2] π i = [ ] a q i (s 0 d i d j )q j qi (c x i )q i F(d i ) 1 2 x2 i. d i x i q i (x i = 0) 13

12 x i = 0 max q i [ a qi (s 0 d i d j )q j ] qi cq i F(d i ) (= π N i ). FOC ( π N i / q i = 0) π N i q i = 0, q N i (d i, d j ) = a c 2 + (s 0 d 1 d 2 ) = a c 2 + s, s = s 0 d i d j 14

13 q N i (d i, d j ) max d i [ a q N i (d i, d j ) (s 0 d i d j )q N j (d i, d j ) ] q N i (d i, d j ) cq N i (d i, d j ) F(d i ). FOC ( π N i / d i = 0) π N i d i = 0 2(a c)2 (2 + s N ) 3 F (d N i ) = 0. s N = s 0 d N i d N j 15

14 max q i [ a qi (s 0 d i d j )q j ] qi (c x i )q i F(d i ) 1 2 x2 i (= π I i ). FOC ( π I i / q i = 0) πi I = 0, qi I q (x i, x j, d i, d j ) = (a c)(2 s) + 2x i sx j, i (2 s)(2 + s) s = s 0 d i d j 16

15 q I i (x i, x j, d i, d j ) max x i [ a q I i (x i, x j, d i, d j ) (s 0 d i d j )q I j (x i, x j, d i, d j ) ] q I i (x i, x j, d i, d j ) FOC ( π I i / x i = 0) (c x i )q I i (x i, x j, d i, d j ) F(d i ) 1 2 x2 i. π I i x i = 0, x I i (d i, d j ) = 4(a c) (2 s)(2 + s) 2 4. x I i (d i, d j ) q I i (x i, x j, d i, d j ) q I i (d i, d j ) 17

16 x I i (d i, d j ) q I i (d i, d j ) max d i [ a q I i (d i, d j ) (s 0 d i d j )q I j (d i, d j ) ] q I i (d i, d j ) [ c x I i (d i, d j ) ] q I i (d i, d j ) F(d i ) 1 2 xi i (d i, d j ) 2 FOC ( π I i / d i = 0) π I i d i = 0, 2(a c)2 (2 + s I ) 2 [8(1 s I ) + (s I ) 3 (4 s I )] [(2 s I )(2 + s I ) 2 4] 3 F (d I i ) = 0 s I = s 0 d I i d I j 18

17 [1] 2(a c) 2 (2 + s N ) 3 F (d N i ) = 0, 2(a c) 2 (2 + s I ) 2 [8(1 s I ) + (s I ) 3 (4 s I )] [(2 s I )(2 + s I ) 2 4] 3 F (d I i ) = 0. FOC s I = s N d I i = d N i FOC 2(a c) 2 (2 + s N ) 2 [8(1 s N ) + (s N ) 3 (4 s N )] [(2 s N )(2 + s N ) 2 4] 3 F (d N i ) = 2(a c)2 (2 + s N ) 2 [8(1 s N ) + (s N ) 3 (4 s N )] [(2 s N )(2 + s N ) 2 4] 3 2(a c)2 (2 + s N ) 3 > 0. 0 s N 1 19

18 [2] 1 d i = di N d i = di N 20

(RJV) 21 22 21

19 Research Joint Venture (RJV) RJV Manasakis et al., 2014 RJV Manasakis et al. (2014, SEJ) 22

23 35 23

20 24

21 Arya and Mittendorf (2006, JRE) 25

22 Arya and Mittendorf (2006, JRE) [1] S F R 1 c 26

23 Arya and Mittendorf (2006) [2] q F q R p = a b(q F + q R ) CS = b(q F + q R ) 2 /2 t F t R 3 r f π S π F π R π F = [ ] a b(q F + q R ) t F qf + rq R + f, π R = [ ] a b(q F + q R ) t R qr rq R f, π S = (t F c)q F + (t R c)q R, 27

24 Arya and Mittendorf (2006) [3] 28

25 [1] q R = 0 r = f = 0 FOC ( π F / q F = 0) max q F [ a bqf t F ] qf (= π F ). π F q F = 0 q N F (t F) = a t F 2b. max t F (t F c)q N F (t F) (= π N S ). 29

26 [2] FOC ( π N S / t F = 0) πs N = 0 tf N t F = a + c 2. π N F = (a c)2 16b, πn S = (a c)2 8b, CS N = (a c)2 32b. 30

27 [1] max q F [ a b(qf + q R ) t F ] qf + rq R (= π F ), max q R [ a b(qf + q R ) t R ] qr rq R (= π R ). FOCs ( π F / q F = 0 and π R / q R = 0) q R F (t F, t R, r) = a 2t F + r + t R 3b, q R F (t F, t R, r) = a 2(r + t R) + t F 3b max t F,t R (t F c)q R F (t F, t R, r) + (t R c)q R R (t F, t R, r) (= π S ). FOCs ( π S / t F = 0 and π S / t R = 0) t R F = a + c 2, tr R (r) = a + c r. 2 31.

28 [2] q R F (t F, t R, r) q R F (t F, t R, r) q R F (r) q R R (r) max r ( a b [ q R F (r) + q R R (r)] t R F (r)) q R F (r) + rqr R (r) (= πr F ). FOC π R F r = 0, rr = 4(a c). 11 π R F = 3(a c)2 44b, π R R = (a c)2 484b, πr S = 31(a c)2 242b, CS R = 9(a c)2 242b. 32

29 π R F πn F (a c)2 = 176b CS R CS N = > 0, πr S 23(a c)2 3872b > 0. πn S = 3(a c)2 968b > 0, (Proposition 1 and 2, pp.338 339) 33

30 (r = 0) tf R(0), tr R (0) q R F (0), qr R (0) π R F (0) = ( a b [ q R F (0) + qr R (0)] tf R (0)) q R F (0) + 0 (a qr c)2 R (0) + f = 36b π R R (0) = ( a b [ q R F (0) + qr R (0)] tf R (0)) q R R (0) 0 (a qr c)2 R (0) f = 36b f F = (a c) 2 /(36b) + f, f. π F F = (a c)2 36b + (a c)2 36b = (a c)2 18b. 34

31 π F F πn F π F F πn F = (a c)2 144b < 0. (Proposition 3. (i), p.340) (Proposition 3. (ii), p.340) 35

36 43 36

32 contest 1 1 contest contest success functions (CSF) Clark and Riis (1998, ET) CSF 37

33 Clark and Riis (1998, ET) CSF [1] Clark and Riis (1998) Skaperdas (1996, ET) Contest Success Function n y = (y 1,..., y n ) p i (y) (CSF) 1 i, 0 p i (y) < 1, n k=1 p k(y) = 1 and y i > 0, p i (y) > 0. 2 i, p i (y)/ y i > 0 and j i, p i (y)/ y j 0. 1 2 38

34 Clark and Riis (1998) CSF [2] 4 i, k i, p i (y 1,..., y k 1, 0, y k+1,..., y n ) = p i (y)/[1 p k (y)]. 6 i, λ > 0, p i (y) = p i (λy). 4 6 λ 6 CSF Skaperdas (1996, ET) 39

35 Clark and Riis (1998, ET) CSF 1 2 4 6 CSF (Clark and Riis, 1998, Theorem on p.202) p i (y) = r α i, α k α i y r i n k=1 α ky r, k CSF r = α i = α k = 1 p i (y) = y i n k=1 y. k 0 y 0 p 0 (y) = y 0 y 0 + n k=1 y. k 40

36 Lafay and Maximin (forthcoming, MDE) [1] Lafay and Maximin (forthcoming, MDE) CSF n K i i p i i p i p 0 CSF p i = K i K 0 + n j=1 K j, p i = l i K l K 0 + n j=1 K j, p 0 = K 0 K 0 + n j=1 K j. CSF K 0 K 0 41

37 Lafay and Maximin (forthcoming) [2] CSF π L π F π O π L π F π O K i 42

38 Lafay and Maximin (forthcoming) [3] K i max K i K i K 0 + n j=1 K j π L + l i K l K 0 + n j=1 K j π F + K 0 K 0 + n j=1 K j π O K i. Nash Huck et al. (2001, EL) CSF Divisionalization CSF 43

44 46 44

39 [1] Arya, A. and Mittendorf, B. (2006) Enhancing vertical efficiency through horizontal licensing. Journal of Regulatory Economics 29(3), 333 342. Clark, D.J. and Riis, C. (1998). Contest success functions: an extension. Economic Theory 11(1), 201 204. Huck, S., Konrad, K.A., and Müller, W. (2001) Divisionalization in contests. Economics Letters 70(1), 89 93. Lafay, T. and Maximin, C. (forthcoming) How R&D competition affects investment choices. Managerial and Decision Economics, DOI:10.1002/mde.2745. Lin, P. and Saggi, K. (2002) Product differentiation, process R&D, and the nature of market competition. European Economic Review 46(1), 201 211. Manasakis, C., Petrakis, E., and Zikos, V. (2014) Downstream Research Joint Venture with upstream market power. Southern Economic Journal 80(3), 782 802. Schumpeter, J., (1975) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 5th ed., Harper: New York. 45

40 [1] Skaperdas, S. (1996) Contest success functions. Economic Theory 7(2), 283 290. 46