(Cohen, 1987; Endler & Parker, 1990; Parker, Endler & Bagby, 1993; Suls, David & Harvey, 1996; Tennen & Herzberger, , 1988; Folkman, Lazarus,

Similar documents
The Japanese Journal of Psychology 2001, Vol. 72, No. 1, The relationship between flexibility of coping to stress and depression Tsukasa Kato (D

2 251 Barrera, 1986; Barrera, e.g., Gottlieb, 1985 Wethington & Kessler 1986 r Cohen & Wills,



The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1991, Vol. 62, No. 3, A study on the reliability and validity of a scale to measure shyness as a trait Atsu

56 56 The Development of Preschool Children s Views About Conflict Resolution With Peers : Diversity of changes from five-year-olds to six-year-olds Y

パーソナリティ研究2006 第14巻 第2号 214–226

The Japanese Journal of Health Psychology, 29(S): (2017)

パーソナリティ研究 2005 第13巻 第2号 170–182

20 Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 1989, 37, 20 \28 THE WILLINGNESS OF SELF-DISCLOSURE AND THE DEVIATION FROM NORMATIVE SELF-DISCLOSURE IN


THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY 2007, Vol. 15 No. 2, 217–227


(’Ó)”R

Newgarten, BL., Havighrst, RJ., & Tobin, S.Life Satisfaction Index-A LSIDiener. E.,Emmons,R.A.,Larsen,R.J.,&Griffin,S. The Satisfaction With Life Scal

66-1 田中健吾・松浦紗織.pwd

Development of the Japanese version of the Purpose in Life scale and an investigation of its factors. Abstract This study aims to develop the Japanese

Jpn. J. Personality 19(2): (2010)

272 11) 12) 1 Barrera 13) 1fl social embeddedness 2fl perceived support 3fl enacted support 3 14) 15) 3 2fl 13) 16;17) 1 14;15;18 21) 2 22;23) 4 24;25

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1987, VoL58, No. 1, A Japanese version of the Sensation-Seeking Scale Masaharu Terasaki (Department of Psycho

越智59.qxd

Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 1995, 43, A JAPANESE VERSION OF THE GENERALIZED SELF-EFFICACY SCALE Scale utility from the life sp

評論・社会科学 85号(よこ)(P)/3.佐分

パーソナリティ研究 2005 第14巻 第1号 1–16

Jpn. J. Personality 18(2): (2009)



, 1996;, , , 1993, 1998, 1989,1992, 1993,1991, 1992, 1993;, 1 991;, 1993;, 1993;, 1994;, 199 5;, 1996;, 1996, 1991;, 1991;, 1994;, 199

(2002a) (1) American Psychiatric Association, (1985) (1989) 1985 (1998) (1999a) (2) 1995 Grotevant, 1998 Leary, T

仏大 社会学部論集47号(P)/6.山口

e.g., Mahoney, Vandell, Simpkins, & Zarrett, Bohnert, Fredricks, & Randall2010 breadth intensitydurationengagement e.g., Mahone

02[ ]小山・池田(責)岩.indd

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

Jpn. J. Personality 19(2): (2010)

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

Weiner, Graham & Chandler, 1982 Weiner, Graham, Stern, & Lawson, 1982 Blaine, Crocker, & Major, ;





Jap. J. of Educ. Psychol., 1985, 33, 295 \306 A STUDY ON EGO IDENTITY IN MIDDLE AGE Yuko OKAMOTO The purposes of this study were to clarify the charac

Juntendo Medical Journal

研究論集Vol.16-No.2.indb

+深見将志.indd


Jpn. J. Personality 22(1): 1-12 (2013)

202

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

_Y13™n‹ä

パーソナリティ研究 2005 第13巻 第2号 231–241

社会関係資本と外国人に対する寛容さに関する研究―JGSS-2008 の分析から―


The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1984, Vol. 55, No. 3, Effects of self-disclosure on interpersonal attraction Masahiko Nakamura (Department

untitled

‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹

04-p45-67cs5.indd

施 ほか/3-18

14 transactional appraisal process 1 causal antecendents mediating processes 1 Lazarus R S Lazarus Lazarus NIOSH 1) ) 2 S R 2 NIOSH salutogenesi

関西福祉大学紀要 12号(P)/1.太田

( ) ATR

05_藤田先生_責

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

Jpn. J. Sch. Psy., 16(1) (2016)

St. Andrew's University NII-Electronic Library Service

Adult Attachment Projective AAP PARS PARS PARS PARS Table

50 Planned Happenstance Parsons Brown Brooks, Gelatt Gelatt 1962 Gelatt, positive uncertainty nonrational Gelatt, 1

(3) Beck (4) (5) Self- Efficacy (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)


ren

橡石本・図表切り貼り版2.PDF

精神障害者

p., a, b, identified resistance p. Iwata, Dorsey, Slifer, Bauman, & Richman, / challenging behavior Matson, function or functional challenging behavio

A pp CALL College Life CD-ROM Development of CD-ROM English Teaching Materials, College Life Series, for Improving English Communica

教育社会学会(180903d)

先端社会研究 ★5★号/4.山崎




QOL Quality Of Lif a... b Fengler A & Goodrich N, 1979 QOL Quality Of Lif Zarit Zarit Zarit SH, Reever KE & Bach-Peterson J, 1980; Zarit SH & Zarit JM

untitled

Human Welfare 8‐1☆/5.林


日本人の子育て観-JGSS-2008 データに見る社会の育児能力に対する評価-

山大紀要13

Change in Emotional Intelligence through the Process of Learning Autogenic Training Ryuichi Sase Abstract The purpose of this study was to examine the

J53-01

TOSCA-A日本語版の信頼性と妥当性について

研究成果報告書(基金分)

ハイコミットメントモデルの有効性についての考察 

パーソナリティ研究 2004 第13 巻 第1 号 79–90

p _08森.qxd

評論・社会科学 124号(P)☆/1.鰺坂

0a-p1-12-会告.indd

untitled

E /...ec6

Ł\1,4.ai

language anxiety :, language-skill-specific anxiety Cheng, Horwitz, & Schallert, Horwitz et al. Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety ScaleFLCAS Young, ;

(2004) (2002) (2004) ( 1990,Smith,Standinger, & Baltes,1994,Carstensen, et al., 2000) (1990) (2006)

高齢期における社会的ネットワークの「多様性」―JGSS-2003データを用いた「相談」ネットワークの分析―

<8ED089EF8B D312D30914F95742E696E6464>

Transcription:

(Cohen, 1987; Endler & Parker, 1990; Parker, Endler & Bagby, 1993; Suls, David & Harvey, 1996; Tennen & Herzberger, 1985 1985, 1988; Folkman, Lazarus, Dunkel-Schetter, DeLongis & Gruen, 1986) É æ éways of Coping Questionnaire (ˆÈ (Bolger, 1990; Cohen, 1987; Endler & Parker, 1990; Lazarus, 1993; Stone, Greenberg, Kennedy-Moore & Newman, 1991; Suls, David & Harvey, 1996)

Amirkhan, J. H. 1990 A factor analytically derived measure of coping: The coping strategy indicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1066-1074 Bolger, N. 1990 Coping as a personality process: A prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 525-537. Bolger, N., DeLongis, A., Kessler, R. C., & Schilling, E. A. 1989 Effects of daily stress on negative mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 808-818. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. 1989 Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 267-283. Cohen, F. 1987 Measurement of coping. In S. V. Kasl & C. L.Cooper (Eds.), Stress and health: Issues in research methodology. Chichester, England: Wiley. Pp.283-305. Compas, B. E., Forsythe, C.J., & Wagner, B.M. 1988 Consistency and variability in causal attributions and coping with stress. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 12,305-320. Compas, B. E., Orosan, P. G., & Grant, K. E. 1993 Adolescent stress and coping: Implications for psychopathology during adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 16, 331-349. Coyne, J. C., & Gottlieb, B.H. 1996 The mismeasure of coping by checklist. Journal of Personality, 64, 959-991. Dolan, C. A., & White, J. W. 1988 Issues of consistency and effectiveness in coping with daily stressors. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 395-407. Edwards, J. R., & Baglioni, A. J. 1993 The measurement of coping with stress: Construct validity of the Ways of Coping Checklist and the Cybernetic Coping Scale. Work and Stress, 7, 17-31. Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. 1990 Multidimensional assessment of coping: A critical evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 844-854. Endler, N. S., & Parker, J. D. A. 1994 Assessment of multidimensional coping: Task, emotion, and avoidance strategies. Psychological Assessment, 6, 50-60. Folkman, S. 1992 Improving coping assessment: Reply to Stone and Kennedy-Moore. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), Hostility, coping and health. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association. Pp.215-223. Folkman,S., & Lazarus, R. S. 1980 An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21, 219 Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. 1985 If it changes it must be a process: Study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 150-170. Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S. 1988 Manual for the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Palo Alto, Folkman, S., Lazarus, R. S., Dunkel-Schetter, C., DeLongis, A., & Gruen, R. 1986 The dynamics of a stressful encounter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 992-1003. Kanner, A. D., Coyne, J.C., Schaefer, C., & Lazarus, R.S., 1981 Comparison of two modes of stress measurement: Daily hassless and uplifts versus major life events. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 4, 1-39.

Krahe, B. 1992 Personality and social psychology: Toward a synthesis. Lazarus, R. S. 1993 Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine, 55, 234-247. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. 1984 Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company. Mattlin, J. A., Wethington, E., & Kessler, R. C. 1990 Situational determinants of coping and coping effectiveness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 31, 103-122. McCrae, R. R. 1984 Situational determinants of coping responses: Loss, threat, and challenge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 919-928. O'Brien, T. B., & DeLongis, A. 1996 The interactional context of problem-, emotion-, and relationship-focused coping: The role of the big five personality factors. Journal of Personality, 64, 775-813. Parker, J. D. A., & Endler, N. S. 1992 Coping with coping assessment: A critical review. European Journal of Personality, 6, 321-344. Parker, J. D. A., Endler, N. S., & Bagby, R. M. 1993 If it changes, it might be unstable: Examining the factor structure of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 5, 361-368. Pearlin, L. I., & Schooler, C. 1978 The structure of coping. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 19, 2-21. Pearson, R. W., Ross.M.A., & Dawes, R. M. 1992 Personal recall and the limits of retrospective questions in surveys. In J.M.Tanur (Ed.), Questions about questions. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. Pp.65-94. Ptacek, J. T., Smith, R. E., Espe, K., & Raffety, B. 1994 Limited correspondence between daily coping reports and retrospective coping recall. Psychological Assessment, 6, 41-49. Radloff, L. S. 1977 The CES-D scale: A selfreport depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385-401. Seiffge-Krenke, I., & Shulman, S. 1993 Stress, coping and relationships in adolescence. In J. Sandy & R.T.Hector (Eds.), Adolescence and its social worlds. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Pp.169-196. Smith, R.E., Leffingwell, T. R., & Ptacek, J. T. 1999 Can people remenber how they coped? Factors associated with discordance between same-

day retrospective reports. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 1050-1061. Stone, A. A., Greenberg, M. A., Kennedy-Moore,E., & Newman, M. G. 1991 Self-report, situationspecific coping questionnaires: What are they measuring? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 648-658. Stone, A. A., & Kennedy-Moore, E. 1992 Assessing situational coping: Conceptual and methodological considerations. In H. S.Friedman (Ed.), Hostility, coping and health. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association. Pp.203-213. Stone, A. A., & Neale, J. M. 1984 New measure of daily coping: Development and preliminary results. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 892-906. Suls, J., David, J. P., & Harvey, J. H. 1996 Personality and coping: Three generations of research. Journal of Personality, 64, 711-735. Tennen, H., & Herzberger, S. 1985 Ways of coping scale. In D. J. Keyser & R. C. Sweetland (Eds.), Test critiques. Kansas: Test Corporation of America. Pp.686-697. Terry, D. J. 1994 Determinants of coping: The role of stable and situational factors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 895-910. Construction of the Interpersonal Inventory for Undergraduates Stress-Coping TSUKASN KAT (KWANSEI GAKUIN UNIVERSITY) JAPANESE OF EDUCATIONAL JOURNAL PSYHOLOGY 2000, 48, 225-234 The purpose of the present study was to construct a coping inventory in order to assess the different ways in which underduates respond to interpersonal stress. Study 1 reports the factor structure of the Interpersonal Stress-Coping Inventory (ISI). This self-report instrument is constructed to identify 3 types of coping strategies: positive relationship-oriented strategies (16 items), negative relatinship-oriented strategies (10 items), and postponed-solution coping (8 items). Study 2 reports the reliability and validity of this inventory. The test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.86 to 0.92. The validity of the Interpersonal Stress- Coping Inventory was asessed by comparing it with the Stress Coping Inventory and measures of stress, depression, and satisfaction with friendships. Overall, the results suggest that the Interpersonal Stress- Coping Inventory is a valid and highly reliable coping scale. Key Words: coping behavior, coping scale, interpersonal stress, interpersonal relationship, mental health