doi: /jjsnr 研究報告 - 2 Reality Shock in Nurses in their Second Year after Graduation Yoko Suzuki Yoshiko Kawatsu Key Words nurse, r

Similar documents
Ⅱ. 用語の操作的定義 Ⅲ. 対象と方法 1. 対象 WAM NET 2. 調査期間 : 3. 調査方法 4. 調査内容 5. 分析方法 FisherMann-Whitney U Kruskal-Wallis SPSS. for Windows 6. 倫理的配慮 Vol. No.

Ⅰ. 緒言 Suzuki, et al., Ⅱ. 研究方法 1. 対象および方法 1 6 表 1 1, 調査票の内容 図

The Journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Administration and Policies Vol 12, No 1, pp 49 59, 2008 資料 看護師におけるメンタリングとキャリア結果の関連 Relationship between M

日本看護管理学会誌15-2


12 Vol. 12, No Benner 8 ICU 1 2 ICU Krippendorff, K ICU 5

32-1_会告.indd

46

_原著03_濱田_責.indd


Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 看護師の勤務体制による睡眠実態についての調査 岩下, 智香九州大学医学部保健学科看護学専攻 出版情報 : 九州大学医学部保健学

医学紀要011-渡邊.indd

原 著 放射線皮膚炎に対する保湿クリームの効果 耳鼻科領域の頭頸部照射の患者に保湿クリームを使用して * 要旨 Gy Key words はじめに 1 70Gy 2 2 QOL

26 1 : Self - reported Practices of Cancer Pain Management among Nurses in Tohoku University Hospital Hideyuki Hira

Human Welfare 8‐1☆/4.坂口

The Journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Administration and Policies Vol 7, No 2, pp 19 _ 30, 2004 Survey on Counseling Services Performed by Nursi


緩和医療13巻2号 pp


0a-p1-12-会告.indd

療養病床に勤務する看護職の職務関与の構造分析

2 The Bulletin of Meiji University of Integrative Medicine 3, Yamashita 10 11

Quality of Life of Outpatients Treated with Low Anterior Resection or Anterior Resection for Colorectal Cancer orrelation Between Dyschezia and Self-c

17.indd

untitled

220 28;29) 30 35) 26;27) % 8.0% 9 36) 8) 14) 37) O O 13 2 E S % % 2 6 1fl 2fl 3fl 3 4

Jap. J. of Educ. Psychol., 1985, 33, 295 \306 A STUDY ON EGO IDENTITY IN MIDDLE AGE Yuko OKAMOTO The purposes of this study were to clarify the charac

総 説 6 6 PIMs P S J 7

02総福研-06_辻.indd

05_藤田先生_責

THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY 2007, Vol. 15 No. 2, 217–227

untitled

2 251 Barrera, 1986; Barrera, e.g., Gottlieb, 1985 Wethington & Kessler 1986 r Cohen & Wills,

16_.....E...._.I.v2006

Yamagata Journal of Health Sciences, Vol. 16, 2013 Tamio KEITOKU 1 2 Katsuko TANNO 3 Kiyoko ARIMA 4 Noboru CHIBA 1 Abstract The present study aimed to

OJT Planned Happenstance


日本禁煙学会雑誌 第11巻第2号

) 5 Lawton QOL 4 4 QOL Lawton 4) Philadelphia Geriatric Center Affect Rating ScaleARS ARS QOL 5) HDS R

_’£”R‡Ù‡©

研究報告 肺がん患者の治療過程において bad news を伝えられた配偶者の心理的ストレス反応 病期における差異とその影響要因 * 要旨 目的 bad news 3 3 方法 bad news 3 結果 44 2/3 3 結論 Key words bad news はじめに 1 2


Perspective-Taking Perspective-Taking.... Vol. No.

JJRM5005/04.短報.責了.indd

’ÓŠ¹/‰´„û


evidence-based mind were significantly higher in the nurses working in hospitals with <500 beds than in the nurses working in hospitals with >500 beds

Therapy for Asthenopia in Cases of Convergence Insufficiency Hiroko TAKASAKI, C.O.J., Nobuko INAGAMI, C.O.J., and Kayoko TAKENAWA, C.O.J.. Orthoptic c

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

28_3-03-伊勢坊 中原先生-原著③.indd

FA

A 18 B 6 AB p >0.05 A1A2B1B2 A3B3 t p > ο =0 1 =12 =2 0 ο14 10=0ο= ο144 0 ο4041ο64 65ο144 WAIS R Wilcoxon

Vol. 52 No ,332,000 1,638, ,774 8 A ,11, II. A. % % B. 500 A A N=353

〈論文〉高校生の学校適応と社会的スキルおよびソーシャルサポートとの関連--不登校生徒との比較

untitled


J. Jpn. Acad. Nurs. Sci. 35: (2015)

施 ほか/3-18

untitled

indd


7 2000b 2000b 2000b A Vol 8, No 2,

08医療情報学22_1_水流final.PDF

Vol. No. Honda, et al.,

e.g., Mahoney, Vandell, Simpkins, & Zarrett, Bohnert, Fredricks, & Randall2010 breadth intensitydurationengagement e.g., Mahone

九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 自己血糖測定演習を通した看護学生の学習過程 鐵井, 千嘉九州大学医学部保健学科看護学専攻 長家, 智子九州大学医学部保健学科看護学専攻

202

272 11) 12) 1 Barrera 13) 1fl social embeddedness 2fl perceived support 3fl enacted support 3 14) 15) 3 2fl 13) 16;17) 1 14;15;18 21) 2 22;23) 4 24;25

Ⅲ. 研究方法 1. 文献検索の方法 Web CiNii Articles Google Scholar 分析と方法 1 表 1 2 表 2 3. 用語の定義 Ⅳ. 結果 1. 退院後の母乳育児支援に関する

pp Dimensional Change Card Sort ****** ** Zelazo, P. D., Carter, A., Reznick, J. S. & Frye, D Zelaz

3.データ 収 集 期 間 4.データ 分 析 方 法 M-GTA M-GTA 5. 倫 理 的 配 慮 Vol. No.

untitled

Consideration of Cycle in Efficiency of Minority Game T. Harada and T. Murata (Kansai University) Abstract In this study, we observe cycle in efficien


Human Welfare 8‐1☆/5.林

8y4...l

<88BB8D8293BF5F907D955C B2E786C7378>

606 Dementia Japan Vol. 29 No. 4 October 2015 Table 1. The day care for people with severe dementia Outline Subjects Personal distribution Medical man

Juntendo Medical Journal


J. Jpn. Acad. Nurs. Sci., Vol.25, No.1, pp.13-22, 2005 Decision Making under the Uncertainty; Process of Decision from Diagnosis to Preventive- Operat

Adult Attachment Projective AAP PARS PARS PARS PARS Table



untitled

A Study of the Comprehensive Framework of Action for Job Retention amongst the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Makoto IWAYAMA Abstract The purpose of this pa

表 参照文献 ( 文献 ). 185, Expert Nurse. 1211, suppl, , CNS 2000, , , , 4

ABSTRACT

11_土居美有紀_様.indd


2 94

) ,

Ⅱ 方法と対象 1. 所得段階別保険料に関する情報の収集 ~3 1, 分析手法

Table 1 Characteristics of the study participants in Imari municipal hospital

Core Ethics Vol. -

1. 緒言 p 問題の所在 ) p

Web Web Web Web 1 1,,,,,, Web, Web - i -

MV X 5 6 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Grade 1 Grade Gy 16 QOL QOL 5 6 7, 8 9, VOL.3 NO

06_学術_技師の現状および将来需要_武藤様1c.indd

Transcription:

doi:10.15065/jjsnr.20170525014 - 研究報告 - Reality Shock in Nurses in their Second Year after Graduation Yoko Suzuki Yoshiko Kawatsu Key Words nurse, reality shock, workplace はじめに 2 2014 2 2010school to work transition 2004 1986 198619861986 Kramer 1974 2004 20062007 20052008 2006 2006 2008 2003 2009 2010 1 20132 2014 Schein 1978/1991 2004 2006 2004 2005 2012 2012 2 2006 Department of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Mejiro University Vol. 41 No. 1 2018 47

2 2004 3 2010 2015 1981Partners in Changes Dana Gaines Robinnson Robinnson & Robinnson 2008/2010 Performance Consulting 2 2 2007 Robinnson & Robinnson 2008/2010 2011 2 2 Ⅰ. 目的 Ⅱ. 研究方法 1. 用語の定義 2 2012 1986 2. 対象 2002 3. 期間 2015 5 11 2015 7 31 4. 収集方法 176 5. 内容 就職後 3ヶ月時の新卒看護師のリアリティショック構成因子 ( 平賀 布施,2007) 17 14 11 5 6 2 4 3 5 1 5 48 Vol. 41 No. 1 2018

職場環境要因 2011 2 4 3 基本属性 離職意向 6. 分析方法 2 3 Mann-Whitney Kruskal-Wallis Steel- Dwass 表 1 対象者の基本属性 n 270 20 231 85.6 30 24 8.9 40 11 4.1 50 1 0.4 3 1.0 4 85 31.5 3 9 3.3 3 140 51.9 2 16 5.9 19 7.0 1 0.4 66 24.4 5 1.9 187 69.3 3 1.1 8 3.0 1 0.2 11 4.1 19 7.0 182 67.4 ICU 36 13.3 22 8.2 201 74.4 57 21.1 12 4.5 238 88.1 6 2.2 20 7.4 1 0.4 5 1.9 Ⅲ. 倫理的配慮 15010 Ⅳ. 結果 872272 31.2 2 270 31.0% 1. 対象者の基本属性 表 120 23185.6%3 14051.9%18769.3% 18267.4% 20174.4% 23888.1% 2. 卒後 2 年目看護師のリアリティショック因子分析 3 2007.4 286KMO.87Cronbach α.91 1.882.853.774.835.736.79 表 2 1 9 2 Vol. 41 No. 1 2018 49

6 3 4 4 3 5 3 1 6 3 5 12 表 3 表 2 卒後 2 年目看護師のリアリティショック構成因子 n 270 Cronbach 1 2 3 4 5 6 1.88 11.867 -.118.142 -.076.022 -.018 12.832 -.041.021.051.002.026 53.712 -.026 -.067.147.035 -.091 25.639.062.032.030.086 -.130 35.548.211 -.065.026 -.043.099 46.545.292 -.034 -.033 -.041.050 39.519.284 -.062 -.006 -.084.022 1.501 -.205.001 -.129 -.023.153 16.499 -.101.090 -.024.094.218 2.85 37.112.806.054 -.088 -.087 -.121 27 -.037.766.058 -.082.153.045 23 -.138.733.162 -.010 -.014.068 28 -.063.707.077 -.010.074.016 34 -.002.437 -.068.220.019.142 55.049.436 -.184.220 -.011.076 3.77 10.052.003.853.004 -.001 -.072 14 -.026.043.673.058 -.030.055 9 -.046.069.631 -.032 -.060.066 19.105.081.542.034 -.010 -.121 4.83 51 -.017.085.053.835.030 -.088 6.019 -.121.033.798 -.069.019 18 -.020.021 -.020.786.020.003 51.73 20.060.041 -.155 -.092.980 -.111 52 -.007.117.044 -.036.575.006 60 -.037 -.131.121.230.518.167 6.79 29.012.046.045 -.048.106.842 61.156.016.029 -.005 -.012.666 4.128.101 -.164.009 -.172.496 Kaiser a.6 1 表 3 卒後 2 年目看護師リアリティショックの各因子平均得点 2 3 4 5 1 6 MSD 2.43 0.80 3.32 0.85 2.25 1.05 3.28 1.16 3.66 0.96 2.81 0.89 50 Vol. 41 No. 1 2018

3. 卒後 2 年目看護師リアリティショック構成因子と職場環境要因の関連 2 Mann- Whitney Kruskal-Wallis 2 3 表 4 教育体制 78 7 職場役割 物理的状況 1 1 1 勤務体制 787 151616 1 1 処遇 Steel-Dwass 1 50% 51% 1 Steel-Dwass 50% 51%50% 1 50% 50% 1 51% Vol. 41 No. 1 2018 51

表 4 卒後 2 年目看護師リアリティショック構成因子と職場環境要因 n 270 n 174n 198 1 2 3 4 5 1 6 118 21.0 129.1 20.0 131.3 9.0 136.8 10.0 128.7 11.0 121.1 9.0 127.5 141 21.5 136.8 20.0 133.8 8.0 129.7 10.0 135.3 12.0 144.3 8.5 136.6 11 27.0 157.1 22.5 177.3 11.0 169.8 11.0 156.8 11.5 143.2 11.0 184.8 94 21.0 141.6 21.0 149.6 * 9.5 142.2 10.0 140.5 11.0 136.2 9.0 148.4 * 174 21.0 132.3 19.5 128.0 8.0 131.9 10.0 131.3 11.0 135.1 8.0 128.6 2 60 21.0 48.9 21.0 48.3 8.0 46.4 9.0 49.7 11.0 50.6 8.0 50.8 2 34 21.5 45.0 21.0 46.0 8.0 49.5 8.5 42.3 11.0 42.1 6.5 41.7 80 7 66 22.0 51.1 19.0 53.2 9.0 50.6 11.0 51.2 12.0 53.0 9.0 54.9 * 8 34 19.5 49.3 18.0 45.2 8.0 50.4 10.5 47.6 11.0 45.6 8.0 42.1 70 72 22.0 144.1 21.0 147.8 9.0 132.1 10.0 130.5 11.0 139.2 9.0 153.2 * 198 21.0 132.4 20.0 131.0 8.0 136.7 10.0 136.0 11.0 134.2 8.0 129.1 1 94 21.0 70.0 20.0 67.2 8.0 67.6 10.0 69.1 12.0 71.6 8.0 72.2 2 45 21.0 70.0 21.0 75.8 8.5 75.0 10.0 70.3 11.0 66.7 7.5 65.4 59 8 42 22.0 38.6 21.0 41.3 8.0 36.8 10.5 40.6 11.5 39.9 9.0 41.6 9 38 23.5 42.6 19.0 39.7 10.0 44.6 10.5 40.4 11.0 41.1 9.0 39.2 118 222 20.0 122.1 20.0 127.2 8.0 129.5 10.0 131.4 11.0 131.9 8.0 125.3 48 28.0 194.3 *** 22.0 170.8 *** 10.0 160.6 * 10.0 146.4 11.0 149.2 10.0 179.5 *** 7 24.0 156.3 19.0 114.6 11.0 185.6 11.0 157.3 12.0 148.0 8.0 120.2 261 21.0 133.9 21.0 135.0 8.0 133.1 10.0 132.9 11.0 134.1 9.0 134.9 2 11 16.0 93.2 19.0 114.0 10.0 163.0 10.0 144.8 11.0 144.0 6.0 90.3 257 21.0 136.3 21.0 135.4 8.0 133.3 10.0 133.0 11.0 134.1 9.0 136.4 2 83 21.0 133.2 21.0 137.7 8.0 135.9 10.0 137.1 12.0 146.3 9.0 141.2 185 21.0 135.1 20.0 133.1 9.0 133.9 10.0 131.9 11.0 129.2 9.0 131.5 2 17 18.0 133.0 22.0 147.9 8.0 149.4 10.0 134.9 12.0 135.2 9.0 135.5 252 21.0 135.1 20.0 134.1 9.0 134.0 10.0 133.9 11.0 135.0 9.0 135.0 1 191 20.0 122.8 20.0 126.8 8.0 126.9 10.0 135.1 11.0 133.4 8.0 124.7 78 25.0 164.9 *** 22.0 155.0 ** 10.0 154.9 ** 10.0 131.4 12.0 139.0 9.0 160.3 ** 1 179 20.0 125.0 20.0 129.3 8.0 129.0 10.0 136.0 11.0 130.5 8.0 126.1 90 23.0 155.0 * 21.0 146.3 9.0 146.9 10.0 130.1 12.0 144.0 9.0 152.8 * 1 170 19.0 123.0 19.0 125.2 8.0 128.2 10.0 134.6 11.0 126.3 8.0 128.0 100 23.0 156.7 ** 22.0 153.1 ** 10.0 148.0 * 10.0 134.3 12.0 151.2 * 9.0 148.3 * 180 20.0 123.8 19.0 123.9 8.0 127.5 10.0 130.1 11.0 122.8 8.0 128.2 69 23.0 157.7 ** 22.0 157.4 ** 10.0 150.1 * 10.0 141.9 12.0 159.8 *** 9.0 148.7 * 1 188 20.0 121.4 20.0 125.2 8.0 128.5 10.0 126.5 11.0 119.4 8.0 124.3 72 24.5 154.3 ** 21.0 144.3 9.5 135.9 10.0 139.0 12.0 159.5 *** 9.0 146.8 * 10 2 207 22.0 137.5 20.0 132.8 8.0 133.8 10.0 131.2 11.5 136.2 9.0 135.5 3 47 20.0 130.0 22.0 146.5 8.0 128.0 11.0 144.7 11.0 136.3 8.0 130.0 4 21.5 147.4 20.0 129.5 11.0 167.4 12.0 166.4 11.0 112.0 9.5 144.1 11 16.5 104.1 18.5 129.0 11.0 176.0 10.0 129.2 9.5 115.1 8.0 143.0 7 147 21.0 126.4 20.0 123.6 8.0 117.9 11.0 134.7 ** 11.0 120.3 9.0 126.8 8 101 21.0 121.7 21.0 125.8 10.0 134.1 9.0 108.2 12.0 130.6 9.0 121.1 22 15 131 21.0 118.2 19.0 111.9 8.0 106.2 10.0 119.3 11.0 110.2 8.0 112.9 16 98 20.0 110.8 21.0 119.2 10.0 126.8 * 9.0 108.1 12.0 121.4 9.0 117.9 41 113 21.5 121.9 20.0 113.7 8.0 113.4 10.5 125.0 11.0 104.1 8.0 112.0 129 20.5 121.2 21.0 128.3 9.0 128.6 10.0 116.6 12.0 136.7 *** 9.0 129.8 * 28 74 19.0 122.4 19.0 122.2 8.0 126.2 10.0 130.4 9.0 75.7 8.0 119.3 193 22.0 138.5 21.0 138.5 9.0 137.0 10.0 134.0 12.0 156.3 *** 9.0 139.7 3 84 20.0 122.6 *** 20.0 128.3 ** 7.0 116.9 ** 10.0 119.4 * 10.0 106.2 ** ** 7.0 117.1 150 20.5 129.3 *** 20.0 133.1 9.0 137.2 * 10.0 136.2 11.0 136.5 ** 9.0 135.8 * 33 25.0 184.2 22.0 152.9 11.0 163.0 12.0 153.3 14.0 193.4 9.0 168.7 3 0-50 102 22.0 142.3 * 21.0 136.4 10.0 149.8 * ** 10.0 128.4 12.0 152.0 ** ** 9.0 145.0 51-100 68 21.5 133.3 20.0 128.5 8.0 124.2 10.0 134.5 10.5 114.9 8.0 124.8 94 19.0 121.3 19.5 131.2 8.0 119.8 10.0 132.8 11.0 124.0 8.0 124.5 4 9 18.0 107.4 ** 22.0 144.2 8.0 115.9 7.0 88.8 * 9.0 97.2 * 7.0 90.7 * 118 20.0 123.8 * 19.0 126.2 9.0 137.7 10.0 131.4 11.0 119.3 ** 8.0 126.5 140 24.0 144.3 21.0 139.9 8.0 132.1 10.0 137.2 12.0 148.8 9.0 143.1 3 Mann-Whitney Kruskal-Wallis Steel-Dwassp.05p.01 p.001 ** 52 Vol. 41 No. 1 2018

1 表 5 卒後 2 年目看護師リアリティショック構成因子と離職意向 2 * 3 4 5 1 * n 270 6 129 19.5 120.2 *** ** 19.0 125.2 * 08.0 122.1 *** ** 10.0 134.2 * 11.0 123.5 ** 08.0 117.9 *** ** 96 25.0 158.6 21.0 148.7 * 10.0 156.9 09.5 128.6 * 12.0 150.5 10.0 162.8 42 25.0 160.8 23.0 185.8 07.0 101.3 14.0 201.5 14.0 222.7 09.0 157.3 3 Mann-Whitney Kruskal-Wallis Steel-Dwassp.05p.01 p.001 1 Steel-Dwass 1 1 4. 卒後 2 年目看護師のリアリティショック構成因子と離職意向との関連 Kruskal-Wallis 表 5 Steel-Dwass Ⅴ. 考察 1. 卒後 2 年目看護師のリアリティショック 2 1 2005 2006 20072003 20042 2003 20082007 2000 2011 2 2 2011 2014 OJT 2 1 1 2 2 3 2 Vol. 41 No. 1 2018 53

2012 2. 卒後 2 年目看護師の職場環境 2011 OJT OJT2009 OJT 3 2009 2003 2 2011 1 5 20102011 2 7 1 2 2010 QOL 2 2007 2 Phillips, C., Esterman, A., & Kenny 2015 2 3. 卒後 2 年目看護師のリアリティショックと離職 2 54 Vol. 41 No. 1 2018

2013 20072010 2010 2010 2012 2010 20082009 2011 2010 2 2 2012 結論 1 12 34 5 1 6628 2 利益相反の開示 著者貢献度 要 旨 目的 : 方法 : 2 270 2007 結果 :212 34 5 16 結論 :2 2 Vol. 41 No. 1 2018 55

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the association between reality shock and workplace environmental factors in nurses in their second year after graduation. Method: Participants included 270 randomly extracted, second-year nurses working in facilities in the Kanto, Kansai, and Chukyo regions of Japan. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire on constituent factors of reality shock and workplace environment developed by Hiraga & Fuse 2007. The questionnaires were returned via mail by individual participants, and the results were statistically analyzed. Result: Reality shock in second-year nurses was caused by six factors: 1 lack of support from senior nurses, 2 psychological burden, 3 physical burden, 4 caring for patients close to death, 5 workload per person, and 6 reduced motivation. Nurses who had a more negative perception of their workplace environment experienced greater reality shock. Conclusion: The suggestion that reality shock in second-year nurses is associated with the workplace environment indicates that review and improvement of the workplace environment of second-year nurses could help reduce or avoid reality shock. 文献,, 2010.., 14 1, 42-50.,,,,,,,,,, 2006.., 22, 1-11., 2007. 3., 30 1, 97-107. 2010.., 23 1, 27-36., 1986.., 11 6, 568-573.,,, 2010.. 38,., 2008.., 7 1, 18-25.,,,,, 2009.. 21.,,,, 2009. 3., 11 1, 1-11., 2010. 4., 5, 19-28.,, 2005.., 9 1, 30-37. 2015.. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/kenkou_iryou/ iryou/quality/2016 8 8 Kramer, M. 1974. Reality shock: Why nurses leave nursing. St Louis: Mosby. 2014.., 39, 133-139.,,,,,,,, 2014. 4., 35, 9-23., 2011.., 41, 17-24. 2014. 2., 39, 147-152.,, 2010.., 12 4, 211-220. 2003.., 23 4, 41-50. 2004.., 27 1, 91-99.,,,, 2006.., 16 1, 43-52., 1986.., 11 6, 562-567.,, 1986.., 11 6, 583-588. 2012...,,, 2009.., 12 1, 16-24. 2013. 2012. http://www.nurse.or.jp/up_pdf/20130307163239_f.pdf 2016 11 20,,,, 2011.., 34 4, 73-82.,, 2010.., 30 3, 51-60. 56 Vol. 41 No. 1 2018

2004.., 7, 296-305. 2006.., 2 1, 13-30. 2012. reality shock., 53 1, 85-126. 2004.., 18 1, 31-44. 2005.., 1 1, 79-93. Phillips, C., Esterman, A., and Kenny, A. 2015. The theory of organizational socialization and its potential for improving transition experiences for new graduate nurses. Nurse Educ Today, 35 1, 118-124. Robinnson, D.G. and Robinnson, J.C. 20082010...,,, 2012.., 52 10, 955-962.,, 2007.., 34 4, 24-27. Schein, E.H. 1978, 1991.,..,,,, 2009.., 13 2, 41-49., 2008.,., 13 2, 16-24., 2008.., 17 1, 22-35.,,, 2011.., 15 1, 17-28.,, 2010. 1 5., 30 1, 52-61.,,, 2013.., 7 1, 55-65. 29 1 10 29 5 25 30 2 2 Vol. 41 No. 1 2018 57