pptx

Microsoft PowerPoint - TominagaHokudai.ppt [互換モード]

2 nd Mar 2011 恒星進化 星形成から探る銀河の形成 進化の研究宇宙最初の星から太陽系形成まで Fe Si NS/BH Massive Star (>10M ) e - -capture SNe (8-10M ) O C He H SN Ic SN Ib SN II Temp [10 8 K] 0.2 1.5 7 15 30 40 50 Burning Stage H He C Ne

H+He H+He M > 10 M He He Wolf-Rayet Minit = 13 ~ 100 M, Zinit = 0.0001 ~ 0.02 CNO SN 2007bi (Type Ic) progenitor Minit > 100 M, Zinit = 0.004 WO star? Core collapse Rotating star model Saio, Nomoto, and

SN 2007bi Yoshida, T. & Umeda, H., MNRAS 412, L78-L82 (2011)

SN 2007bi Yoshida, T. & Umeda, H., MNRAS 412, L78-L82 (2011) SN 2007bi SN 2007bi (Gal-Yam et al. 2009) 2007 4 6.5 Type Ic subluminous dwarf galaxy Z ~ (0.2-0.4) Z (Young et al. 2010) 36 (Young et al. 2010)

SFN

THE STAR FORMATION NEWSLETTER No.291-14 March 2017 2017/04/28 16-20 16. X-Shooter spectroscopy of young stellar objects in Lupus. Atmospheric parameters, membership and activity diagnostics 17. The evolution

Ando_JournalClub_160708

Independent discoveries of a tidally disrupting dwarf galaxy around NGC 253! A Tidally Disrupting Dwarf Galaxy in the Halo of NGC 253 Toloba, E. et al. 2016, ApJL, 816, L5 (hereafter T16, accepted 2015.12.07)

Contents 1. Ia cosmology 2. Ia / rate 3.

WISH ( ) Contents 1. Ia cosmology 2. Ia / rate 3. supernova (CC SN) Ia (SN Ia) supernova classification supernova Ia (SN Ia) - : redshift z~1.5 - progenitor system: Single Degenerate? Double Degenerate?

スライド 1

精度銀河形成 シミュレーション時代の幕開け 斎藤貴之国 天 台天 シミュレーションプロジェクト 共同研究者松井秀典 久保英 郎 和 桂 富阪幸治 牧野淳 郎 (NAOJ) 台坂博 ( 橋 ) 吉 直紀 ( 東 ) 岡本崇 ( 筑波 ) 場淳 ( 東北 ) 初期条件 我々の宇宙がどのような進化をするかは極めて正確にわかっている 冷たい暗 物質が 配する宇宙 宇宙背景放射 銀河サーベイなどの結果から さな構造が先にでき

( )

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. ( ) () http://www-astro.physics.ox.ac.uk/~wjs/apm_grey.gif http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap950917.html ( ) SDSS : d 2 r i dt 2 = Gm jr ij j i rij 3 = Newton 3 0.1% 19 20 20 2 ( ) 3 3

爆発的星形成? AGN関係を 生み出す物理機構の観測的示唆

Umemura, Fukue & Mineshige 1997, 1998 Ohsuga et al. 1998 R ring ~100pc dv r = v 2 ϕ dt r 1 dp ρ dr dφ 1 r d(rv ϕ ) dt = 3χE 2c typical timescale dr + χ c F r 3 2 Myr r R ring V ring 3χE 2c v ϕ Umemura,

Contents 1. Ia? 2. Ia 3. WISH Ia cosmology 4. WISH Ia + rate 5.

Type Ia Supernova Survey w/ WISH Contents 1. Ia? 2. Ia 3. WISH Ia cosmology 4. WISH Ia + rate 5. Contents 1. Ia? 2. Ia 3. WISH Ia cosmology 4. WISH Ia + rate 5. Type Ia Supernova + +?? (single degenerate)?

GJG160842_O.QXD

vol5-honma (LSR: Local Standard of Rest) 2.1 LSR R 0 LSR Θ 0 (Galactic Constant) 1985 (IAU: International Astronomical Union) R 0 =8.5

2.2 1 2.2 2.2.1 (LSR: Local Standard of Rest) 2.1 LSR R 0 LSR Θ 0 (Galactic Constant) 1985 (IAU: International Astronomical Union) R 0 =8.5 kpc, Θ 0 = 220 km s 1. (2.1) R 0 7kpc 8kpc Θ 0 180 km s 1 270

: u i = (2) x i Smagorinsky τ ij τ [3] ij u i u j u i u j = 2ν SGS S ij, (3) ν SGS = (C s ) 2 S (4) x i a u i ρ p P T u ν τ ij S c ν SGS S csgs

15 C11-4 Numerical analysis of flame propagation in a combustor of an aircraft gas turbine, 4-6-1 E-mail: tominaga@icebeer.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp, 2-11-16 E-mail: ntani@iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp, 4-6-1 E-mail: itoh@icebeer.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp,

Akira MIZUTA(KEK) AM, Nagataki, Aoi (ApJ, , 2011) AM + (in prep)

Akira MIZUTA(KEK) AM, Nagataki, Aoi (ApJ, 732 26, 2011) AM + (in prep) 2011.12.28 GRB GRB. ex. GRB980425/SN1998bw, GRB030329/SN2003dh XRF060218/SN2006aj. GRB091127/SN2009nz XRF100316D/SN2010bh Spectrum

D = [a, b] [c, d] D ij P ij (ξ ij, η ij ) f S(f,, {P ij }) S(f,, {P ij }) = = k m i=1 j=1 m n f(ξ ij, η ij )(x i x i 1 )(y j y j 1 ) = i=1 j

6 6.. [, b] [, d] ij P ij ξ ij, η ij f Sf,, {P ij } Sf,, {P ij } k m i j m fξ ij, η ij i i j j i j i m i j k i i j j m i i j j k i i j j kb d {P ij } lim Sf,, {P ij} kb d f, k [, b] [, d] f, d kb d 6..

磁性物理学 - 遷移金属化合物磁性のスピンゆらぎ理論

email: takahash@sci.u-hyogo.ac.jp May 14, 2009 Outline 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2 / 262 Today s Lecture: Mode-mode Coupling Theory 100 / 262 Part I Effects of Non-linear Mode-Mode Coupling Effects of Non-linear

総研大恒星進化概要.dvi

The Structure and Evolution of Stars I. Basic Equations. M r r =4πr2 ρ () P r = GM rρ. r 2 (2) r: M r : P and ρ: G: M r Lagrange r = M r 4πr 2 rho ( ) P = GM r M r 4πr. 4 (2 ) s(ρ, P ) s(ρ, P ) r L r T

positron 1930 Dirac 1933 Anderson m 22Na(hl=2.6years), 58Co(hl=71days), 64Cu(hl=12hour) 68Ge(hl=288days) MeV : thermalization m psec 100

positron 1930 Dirac 1933 Anderson m 22Na(hl=2.6years), 58Co(hl=71days), 64Cu(hl=12hour) 68Ge(hl=288days) 0.5 1.5MeV : thermalization 10 100 m psec 100psec nsec E total = 2mc 2 + E e + + E e Ee+ Ee-c mc

Formation process of regular satellites on the circumplanetary disk Hidetaka Okada Department of Earth Sciences, Undergraduate school of Scie

Formation process of regular satellites on the circumplanetary disk Hidetaka Okada 22060172 Department of Earth Sciences, Undergraduate school of Science, Hokkaido University Planetary and Space Group

A 99% MS-Free Presentation

A 99% MS-Free Presentation 2 Galactic Dynamics (Binney & Tremaine 1987, 2008) Dynamics of Galaxies (Bertin 2000) Dynamical Evolution of Globular Clusters (Spitzer 1987) The Gravitational Million-Body Problem

1. 4cm 16 cm 4cm 20cm 18 cm L λ(x)=ax [kg/m] A x 4cm A 4cm 12 cm h h Y 0 a G 0.38h a b x r(x) x y = 1 h 0.38h G b h X x r(x) 1 S(x) = πr(x) 2 a,b, h,π

. 4cm 6 cm 4cm cm 8 cm λ()=a [kg/m] A 4cm A 4cm cm h h Y a G.38h a b () y = h.38h G b h X () S() = π() a,b, h,π V = ρ M = ρv G = M h S() 3 d a,b, h 4 G = 5 h a b a b = 6 ω() s v m θ() m v () θ() ω() dθ()

The Evaluation on Impact Strength of Structural Elements by Means of Drop Weight Test Elastic Response and Elastic Limit by Hiroshi Maenaka, Member Sh

The Evaluation on Impact Strength of Structural Elements by Means of Drop Weight Test Elastic Response and Elastic Limit by Hiroshi Maenaka, Member Shigeru Kitamura, Member Masaaki Sakuma Genya Aoki, Member

4 19

I / 19 8 1 4 19 : : f(e, J), f(e) Phase mixing Landau Damping, violent relaxation : 2 2 : ( ) http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap950917.html ( ) http://www-astro.physics.ox.ac.uk/~wjs/apm_grey.gif

Gravothermal Catastrophe & Quasi-equilibrium Structure in N-body Systems

2004/3/1 3 N 1 Antonov Problem & Quasi-equilibrium State in N-body N Systems A. Taruya (RESCEU, Univ.Tokyo) M. Sakagami (Kyoto Univ.) 2 Antonov problem N-body study of quasi-attractivity M15 T Antonov

Outline I. Introduction: II. Pr 2 Ir 2 O 7 Like-charge attraction III.

Masafumi Udagawa Dept. of Physics, Gakushuin University Mar. 8, 16 @ in Gakushuin University Reference M. U., L. D. C. Jaubert, C. Castelnovo and R. Moessner, arxiv:1603.02872 Outline I. Introduction:

/ Christopher Essex Radiation and the Violation of Bilinearity in the Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Planet.Space Sci.32 (1984) 1035 Radiat

/ Christopher Essex Radiation and the Violation of Bilinearity in the Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes, Planet.Space Sci.32 (1984) 1035 Radiation and the Continuing Failure of the Bilinear Formalism,

2 X-ray 6 gamma-ray 7 1 17.1 0:38m 0:77m nm 17.2 Hz Hz 1 E p E E = h = ch= (17.2) p = E=c = h=c = h= (17.3) continuum continuous spectrum line spectru

1 17 object 1 observation 17.1 X electromagnetic wave photon 1 = c (17.1) c =3 10 8 ms ;1 m mm = 10 ;3 m m =10 ;6 m nm = 10 ;9 m 1 Hz 17.1 spectrum radio 2 infrared 3 visual light optical light 4 ultraviolet

1 1.1,,,.. (, ),..,. (Fig. 1.1). Macro theory (e.g. Continuum mechanics) Consideration under the simple concept (e.g. ionic radius, bond valence) Stru

1. 1-1. 1-. 1-3.. MD -1. -. -3. MD 1 1 1.1,,,.. (, ),..,. (Fig. 1.1). Macro theory (e.g. Continuum mechanics) Consideration under the simple concept (e.g. ionic radius, bond valence) Structural relaxation

1 a b cc b * 1 Helioseismology * * r/r r/r a 1.3 FTD 9 11 Ω B ϕ α B p FTD 2 b Ω * 1 r, θ, ϕ ϕ * 2 *

448 8542 1 e-mail: ymasada@auecc.aichi-edu.ac.jp 1. 400 400 1.1 10 1 1 5 1 11 2 3 4 656 2015 10 1 a b cc b 22 5 1.2 * 1 Helioseismology * 2 6 8 * 3 1 0.7 r/r 1.0 2 r/r 0.7 3 4 2a 1.3 FTD 9 11 Ω B ϕ α B

10 0 10-1 100 Mpc simulation (z = 1.0) 34 Mpc simulation (z = 1.0) (Mpc/h) -3 / mag 10-2 10-3 10-4 10-5 -24-22 -20-18 -16-14 M B - 5 log h (Mpc/h) -3 / mag 10 0 10-1 10-2 10-3 10-4 conbined simulation

LLG-R8.Nisus.pdf

d M d t = γ M H + α M d M d t M γ [ 1/ ( Oe sec) ] α γ γ = gµ B h g g µ B h / π γ g = γ = 1.76 10 [ 7 1/ ( Oe sec) ] α α = λ γ λ λ λ α γ α α H α = γ H ω ω H α α H K K H K / M 1 1 > 0 α 1 M > 0 γ α γ =

本文／目次（裏白）

gr09.dvi

.1, θ, ϕ d = A, t dt + B, t dtd + C, t d + D, t dθ +in θdϕ.1.1 t { = f1,t t = f,t { D, t = B, t =.1. t A, tdt e φ,t dt, C, td e λ,t d.1.3,t, t d = e φ,t dt + e λ,t d + dθ +in θdϕ.1.4 { = f1,t t = f,t {

B

B07557 0 0 (AGN) AGN AGN X X AGN AGN Geant4 AGN X X X (AGN) AGN AGN X AGN. AGN AGN Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert AGN 94 Carl Seyfert Seyfert Seyfert z < 0. Seyfert I II I 000 km/s 00 km/s II AGN (BLR) (NLR)

宇宙理論研究室ガイダンス

60 S.L.Glashow Glashow : Interaction Warner Books 4 4 1978 12 CMB 10-40 -40 CMB / The universe in a nutshell A H He C, O Ne, Mg Si Fe Sphere(0.1 cylinder (0. slab (0. Cylinder hole (0. Spherical hole

Gmech08.dvi

145 13 13.1 13.1.1 0 m mg S 13.1 F 13.1 F /m S F F 13.1 F mg S F F mg 13.1: m d2 r 2 = F + F = 0 (13.1) 146 13 F = F (13.2) S S S S S P r S P r r = r 0 + r (13.3) r 0 S S m d2 r 2 = F (13.4) (13.3) d 2

7-1yamazaki.pptx

Suzaku/ASTRO-H Suzaku/ASTRO-H 1. Vela ( Watchman ) (1967 1979): GRB (1969) 2. GINGA (1987 1991): X-ray counterpart GRB (galactic) X-ray burst? 3. BATSE (1991 2000): Galactic origin models!!! 4. BeppoSAX

Contents 1 Jeans (

Contents 1 Jeans 2 1.1....................................... 2 1.2................................. 2 1.3............................... 3 2 3 2.1 ( )................................ 4 2.2 WKB........................

untitled

masato@icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp 996 Start 997 998 999 000 00 00 003 004 005 006 007 008 SK-I Accident Partial Reconstruction SK-II Full reconstruction ( SK-III ( ),46 (40%) 5,8 (9%),9 (40%) 5MeV 7MeV 4MeV(plan)

1. : 1.5 2. ( ): 2.5 3. : 1 ( ) / minimum solar nebula model ( ) http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap950917.html ( ) http://www-astro.physics.ox.ac.uk/~wjs/apm_grey.gif ( ) SDSS : d 2 r i dt 2 ÿ j i

MW鹿児島

NGC1068 Dark Matter Halo baryon gas stars SMBH SMBH 1 SMBHs? (AGN) AGN Seyfertization Taniguchi 1987, ApJ, 317, L57 AGN The dead quasar problem (Rees 1990, Science, 247, 817) T AGN ~ 10 8 yrs AGN AGN

ISLE 2010/08/17

ISLE 2010/08/17 Talk plan 1. ISLE 2. 3. 4. 2011A 2010/8/17 OAOUM 2010 ISLE 2010/8/17 OAOUM 2010 ISLE OASIS HAWAII (HgCdTe 1024 1024) 4.2 4.2 arcmin 2, 0.25 arcsec/pix (13 Filters) 2006B FWHM = 0.75 arcsec

理論懇2014

Proposal for a project of high-precision stellar radial velocity work, Struve (1952)! But there seems to be no compelling reason why the hypothetical stellar planets should not, in some instances, be much

untitled

kajino@nao.ac.jp http://th.nao.ac.jp/~gkajino/? BIG-BANG! STARS SUPERNOVAE? R-PROCESS COSMIC-RAYS R S N=50) R S N=82) R S N=126) ++ + Actinide AGB STARS S-PROCESS 232 Th (14.05Gy) P 238 U (4.47 Gy) SUPERNOVA-γ

Ï¢À±ÃæÀŁ»ÒÀ±¤ª¤è¤Ó¥Ö¥é¥Ã¥¯¥Û¡¼¥ë¡ÝÃæÀŁ»ÒÀ±Ï¢À±¤Î¹çÂÎ ¡Á ½àÊ¿¹Õ²ò¤Î¸¦µæ¤Î¸½¾õ¤Èº£¸å¤ÎŸ˾ ¡Á

2009 10 15 (UWM) 2009 10 15 2 / 35 1 2 Corotation Irrotation 3 4 (UWM) 2009 10 15 3 / 35 10 100/yr (D = 300 Mpc) 1 40/yr (D = 300 Mpc) GWs 1 700/yr (D = 300 Mpc) X BH NS LIGO (UWM) 2009 10 15 4 / 35 (UWM)

Title ブラックホールと重力波天文学 Author(s) 長峯, 健太郎 Citation 高大連携物理教育セミナー報告書. 28 Issue Date Text Version publisher URL DO

Title ブラックホールと重力波天文学 Author(s) 長峯, 健太郎 Citation 高大連携物理教育セミナー報告書. 28 Issue Date 2017-03 Text Version publisher URL http://hdl.handle.net/11094/60516 DOI rights Osaka University Knowledge Archive : OUKA

chap03.dvi

99 3 (Coriolis) cm m (free surface wave) 3.1 Φ 2.5 (2.25) Φ 100 3 r =(x, y, z) x y z F (x, y, z, t) =0 ( DF ) Dt = t + Φ F =0 onf =0. (3.1) n = F/ F (3.1) F n Φ = Φ n = 1 F F t Vn on F = 0 (3.2) Φ (3.1)

Formation of hot jupiters by slingshot model Naoya Okazawa Department of Earth Sciences, Undergraduate school of Science, Hokkaido University

Formation of hot jupiters by slingshot model Naoya Okazawa 22070283 Department of Earth Sciences, Undergraduate school of Science, Hokkaido University Planetary and Space Group 2011 4 18 1,.,,.,.,.,..,.,.,,.,.,,,.,.,.,.,,,..

CMP Technical Report No. 4 Department of Computational Nanomaterials Design ISIR, Osaka University 2 2................................. 2.2......................... 2 3 3 3................................

放射線化学, 92, 39 (2011)

V. M. S. V. 1 Contents of the lecture note by Prof. V. M. Byakov and Dr. S. V. Stepanov (Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Russia) are described in a series of articles. The first article

B 1 B.1.......................... 1 B.1.1................. 1 B.1.2................. 2 B.2........................... 5 B.2.1.......................... 5 B.2.2.................. 6 B.2.3..................

JFE.dvi

,, Department of Civil Engineering, Chuo University Kasuga 1-13-27, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112 8551, JAPAN E-mail : atsu1005@kc.chuo-u.ac.jp E-mail : kawa@civil.chuo-u.ac.jp SATO KOGYO CO., LTD. 12-20, Nihonbashi-Honcho

磁気測定によるオーステンパ ダクタイル鋳鉄の残留オーステナイト定量

33 Non-destructive Measurement of Retained Austenite Content in Austempered Ductile Iron Yoshio Kato, Sen-ichi Yamada, Takayuki Kato, Takeshi Uno Austempered Ductile Iron (ADI) 100kg/mm 2 10 ADI 10 X ADI

橡ボーダーライン.PDF

1 ( ) ( ) 2 3 4 ( ) 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 ( ) 15 16 17 18 19 20 ( ) 21 22 23 24 ( ) 25 26 27 28 29 30 ( ) 31 To be or not to be 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 ( ) 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 ( ) 49 50 51 52

/ 18 12 4 ( ) ( ) : : f(e, J), f(e) Phase mixing Landau Damping, violent relaxation : 2 2 : ? m i d 2 x i dt 2 = j i f ij (1) x i m i i f ij j i f ij G f ij = Gm i m j x j x i x j x i 3, (2) ( ) 2 (

( ) Note Ω m = 1 Ω m : ( ) r-process α 1: 2 32T h(t 1/2 = y) 2 38U(t 1/2 = y) 2 35U(t 1/2 = 7.038

( ) Note 4 19 11 22 6 6.1 1 Ω m = 1 Ω m.3 6.1.1 : ( ) r-process α 1: 2 32T h(t 1/2 = 1.45 1 1 y) 2 38U(t 1/2 = 4.468 1 9 y) 2 35U(t 1/2 = 7.38 1 8 y) 2 44Pu(t 1/2 = 8.26 1 7 y) β / (J.A.Johnson and M.Bolte:

arxiv: v1(astro-ph.co)

arxiv:1311.0281v1(astro-ph.co) R µν 1 2 Rg µν + Λg µν = 8πG c 4 T µν Λ f(r) R f(r) Galileon φ(t) Massive Gravity etc... Action S = d 4 x g (L GG + L m ) L GG = K(φ,X) G 3 (φ,x)φ + G 4 (φ,x)r + G 4X (φ)

Mathews Grant J. (University of Notre Dame) Boyd Richard N. (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) 2009/5/21

Mathews Grant J. (University of Notre Dame) Boyd Richard N. (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory) 2009/5/21 Abstract strongly interacting massive particles (SIMPs, X) Big Bang (BBN) X heavy colored

日本統計学会誌, 第44巻, 第2号, 251頁-270頁

44, 2, 205 3 25 270 Multiple Comparison Procedures for Checking Differences among Sequence of Normal Means with Ordered Restriction Tsunehisa Imada Lee and Spurrier (995) Lee and Spurrier (995) (204) (2006)

l ηµν hµν g µν = η µν + h µν, h µν 1 l Transvers-Traceless (TT) h TT 0µ = 0, η ij i h TT jk = 0, η ij h TT ij = 0, η µν µ ν h TT ij = 2 c 2 t + Δ 2 h TT = 0 ij 2 Polarization l From the TT condition, h

SFGÇÃÉXÉyÉNÉgÉãå`.pdf

SFG 1 SFG SFG I SFG (ω) χ SFG (ω). SFG χ χ SFG (ω) = χ NR e iϕ +. ω ω + iγ SFG φ = ±π/, χ φ = ±π 3 χ SFG χ SFG = χ NR + χ (ω ω ) + Γ + χ NR χ (ω ω ) (ω ω ) + Γ cosϕ χ NR χ Γ (ω ω ) + Γ sinϕ. 3 (θ) 180

H 0 H = H 0 + V (t), V (t) = gµ B S α qb e e iωt i t Ψ(t) = [H 0 + V (t)]ψ(t) Φ(t) Ψ(t) = e ih0t Φ(t) H 0 e ih0t Φ(t) + ie ih0t t Φ(t) = [

3 3. 3.. H H = H + V (t), V (t) = gµ B α B e e iωt i t Ψ(t) = [H + V (t)]ψ(t) Φ(t) Ψ(t) = e iht Φ(t) H e iht Φ(t) + ie iht t Φ(t) = [H + V (t)]e iht Φ(t) Φ(t) i t Φ(t) = V H(t)Φ(t), V H (t) = e iht V (t)e

1 r 8, , 238 N, Z 28, 50, 82, 126 r cm cm 3 1,000 1 s s slow s 8 s 2 2 s s * 1 * 2 * 3 1 N 50, 82, s * r

r 181 8588 2 21 1 e-mail: shinya.wanajo@nao.ac.jp r r r r r 1. r r r r r 1.1 r 1 10 107 1 7 1 r 8,000 300 232 235, 238 N, Z 28, 50, 82, 126 r 10 7 10 11 cm 3 10 25 cm 3 1,000 1 s s slow s 8 s 2 2 s s *

Spacecraft Propulsion Using Solar Energy Spacecraft with Magnetic Field Light from the Sun Solar Wind Thrust Mirror Solar Sail Thrust production by li

2004.3.28 物理学会シンポジウム 磁気プラズマセイル の可能性と 深宇宙探査への挑戦 宇宙航空研究開発機構 船木一幸 Spacecraft Propulsion Using Solar Energy Spacecraft with Magnetic Field Light from the Sun Solar Wind Thrust Mirror Solar Sail Thrust production

,, Andrej Gendiar (Density Matrix Renormalization Group, DMRG) 1 10 S.R. White [1, 2] 2 DMRG ( ) [3, 2] DMRG Baxter [4, 5] 2 Ising 2 1 Ising 1 1 Ising

,, Andrej Gendiar (Density Matrix Renormalization Group, DMRG) 1 10 S.R. White [1, 2] 2 DMRG ( ) [3, 2] DMRG Baxter [4, 5] 2 Ising 2 1 Ising 1 1 Ising Model 1 Ising 1 Ising Model N Ising (σ i = ±1) (Free

2 g g = GM R 2 = 980 cm s ;1 M m potential energy E r E = ; GMm r (1.4) potential = E m = ;GM r (1.5) r F E F = ; de dr (1.6) g g = ; d dr (1.7) g g g

1 1 (gravitation) 1.1 m F a ma = F (1.1) F a m F 1.1 m F a (1.1) m a F m F a m a F F a m 0 0 1.2 (universal gravitation) (potential) M m gravitational force F r F = ; GMm r 2 (1.2) G = 6:67 10 ;8 dyn cm

64 3 g=9.85 m/s 2 g=9.791 m/s 2 36, km ( ) 1 () 2 () m/s : : a) b) kg/m kg/m k

63 3 Section 3.1 g 3.1 3.1: : 64 3 g=9.85 m/s 2 g=9.791 m/s 2 36, km ( ) 1 () 2 () 3 9.8 m/s 2 3.2 3.2: : a) b) 5 15 4 1 1. 1 3 14. 1 3 kg/m 3 2 3.3 1 3 5.8 1 3 kg/m 3 3 2.65 1 3 kg/m 3 4 6 m 3.1. 65 5

SuperMassive Black Holes

Hello! Galaxy Morphology, Galaxies Near and Far SuperMassive Black Holes and all that Ajit Kembhavi IUCAA, Pune Galaxy Morphology, Galaxies Near and Far SuperMassive Black Holes and all that Ajit Kembhavi

D v D F v/d F v D F η v D (3.2) (a) F=0 (b) v=const. D F v Newtonian fluid σ ė σ = ηė (2.2) ė kl σ ij = D ijkl ė kl D ijkl (2.14) ė ij (3.3) µ η visco

post glacial rebound 3.1 Viscosity and Newtonian fluid f i = kx i σ ij e kl ideal fluid (1.9) irreversible process e ij u k strain rate tensor (3.1) v i u i / t e ij v F 23 D v D F v/d F v D F η v D (3.2)

IV (2)

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS (CFD) IV (2) The Analysis of Numerical Schemes (2) 11. Iterative methods for algebraic systems Reima Iwatsu, e-mail : iwatsu@cck.dendai.ac.jp Winter Semester 2007, Graduate

atomic line spectrum emission line absorption line atom proton neutron nuclei electron Z atomic number A mass number neutral atom ion energy

1 22 22.1 atomic line spectrum emission line absorption line atom proton neutronnuclei electron Z atomic number A mass number neutral atom ion energy level ground stateexcited state ionized state 22.2

untitled

18 1 2,000,000 2,000,000 2007 2 2 2008 3 31 (1) 6 JCOSSAR 2007pp.57-642007.6. LCC (1) (2) 2 10mm 1020 14 12 10 8 6 4 40,50,60 2 0 1998 27.5 1995 1960 40 1) 2) 3) LCC LCC LCC 1 1) Vol.42No.5pp.29-322004.5.

輻射の量子論、選択則、禁制線、許容線

Radiative Processes in Astrophysics 005/8/1 http://wwwxray.ess.sci.osaka- u.ac.jp/~hayasida Semi-Classical Theory of Radiative Transitions r r 1/ 4 H = ( cp ea) m c + + eφ nonrelativistic limit, Coulomb

こんにちは由美子です

Sample size power calculation Sample Size Estimation AZTPIAIDS AIDSAZT AIDSPI AIDSRNA AZTPr (S A ) = π A, PIPr (S B ) = π B AIDS (sampling)(inference) π A, π B π A - π B = 0.20 PI 20 20AZT, PI 10 6 8 HIV-RNA

( ) 2 self-consistent 1 3) ( ) 2.1 ( ) ( 1 kpc 10 8 M 10 4 K) 1024 2 4096 2 100 1680 ( 1) 10 K 10 4 5 K tangled-web model ( ) 2

Numerical Modeling of the Interstellar Medium WADA Keiichi (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) Abstract The interstellar medium in galaxies has a complicated multi-phase structure. However, in

II ( ) (7/31) II ( [ (3.4)] Navier Stokes [ (6/29)] Navier Stokes 3 [ (6/19)] Re

II 29 7 29-7-27 ( ) (7/31) II (http://www.damp.tottori-u.ac.jp/~ooshida/edu/fluid/) [ (3.4)] Navier Stokes [ (6/29)] Navier Stokes 3 [ (6/19)] Reynolds [ (4.6), (45.8)] [ p.186] Navier Stokes I Euler Navier

N cos s s cos ψ e e e e 3 3 e e 3 e 3 e

3 3 5 5 5 3 3 7 5 33 5 33 9 5 8 > e > f U f U u u > u ue u e u ue u ue u e u e u u e u u e u N cos s s cos ψ e e e e 3 3 e e 3 e 3 e 3 > A A > A E A f A A f A [ ] f A A e > > A e[ ] > f A E A < < f ; >

PowerPoint Presentation

2010 KEK (Japan) (Japan) (Japan) Cheoun, Myun -ki Soongsil (Korea) Ryu,, Chung-Yoe Soongsil (Korea) 1. S.Reddy, M.Prakash and J.M. Lattimer, P.R.D58 #013009 (1998) Magnetar : ~ 10 15 G ~ 10 17 19 G (?)

19 σ = P/A o σ B Maximum tensile strength σ % 0.2% proof stress σ EL Elastic limit Work hardening coefficient failure necking σ PL Proportional

19 σ = P/A o σ B Maximum tensile strength σ 0. 0.% 0.% proof stress σ EL Elastic limit Work hardening coefficient failure necking σ PL Proportional limit ε p = 0.% ε e = σ 0. /E plastic strain ε = ε e

[ ] (Ising model) 2 i S i S i = 1 (up spin : ) = 1 (down spin : ) (4.38) s z = ±1 4 H 0 = J zn/2 i,j S i S j (4.39) i, j z 5 2 z = 4 z = 6 3

4.2 4.2.1 [ ] (Ising model) 2 i S i S i = 1 (up spin : ) = 1 (down spin : ) (4.38) s z = ±1 4 H 0 = J zn/2 S i S j (4.39) i, j z 5 2 z = 4 z = 6 3 z = 6 z = 8 zn/2 1 2 N i z nearest neighbors of i j=1

EGunGPU

Super Computing in Accelerator simulations - Electron Gun simulation using GPGPU - K. Ohmi, KEK-Accel Accelerator Physics seminar 2009.11.19 Super computers in KEK HITACHI SR11000 POWER5 16 24GB 16 134GFlops,

放射線専門医認定試験（２００９・２０回）／ＨＯＨＳ‐０５（基礎二次）

2 2 1?? 2 1 1, 2 1, 2 1, 2, 3,... 1, 2 1, 3? , 2 2, 3? k, l m, n k, l m, n kn > ml...? 2 m, n n m

2009 IA I 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 4 21 1 1 2 1! 4, 5 1? 50 1 2 1 1 2 1 4 2 2 2 1?? 2 1 1, 2 1, 2 1, 2, 3,... 1, 2 1, 3? 2 1 3 1 2 1 1, 2 2, 3? 2 1 3 2 3 2 k, l m, n k, l m, n kn > ml...? 2 m, n n m 3 2

1 9 v.0.1 c (2016/10/07) Minoru Suzuki T µ 1 (7.108) f(e ) = 1 e β(e µ) 1 E 1 f(e ) (Bose-Einstein distribution function) *1 (8.1) (9.1)

1 9 v..1 c (216/1/7) Minoru Suzuki 1 1 9.1 9.1.1 T µ 1 (7.18) f(e ) = 1 e β(e µ) 1 E 1 f(e ) (Bose-Einstein distribution function) *1 (8.1) (9.1) E E µ = E f(e ) E µ (9.1) µ (9.2) µ 1 e β(e µ) 1 f(e )

プログラム

2007 5 iii 1 1 1.1.................... 1 2 5 2.1 (shear stress) (shear strain)...... 5 2.1.1...................... 6 2.1.2.................... 6 2.2....................... 7 2.2.1........................

ohpr.dvi

2003/12/04 TASK PAF A. Fukuyama et al., Comp. Phys. Rep. 4(1986) 137 A. Fukuyama et al., Nucl. Fusion 26(1986) 151 TASK/WM MHD ψ θ ϕ ψ θ e 1 = ψ, e 2 = θ, e 3 = ϕ ϕ E = E 1 e 1 + E 2 e 2 + E 3 e 3 J :

IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2014-ARC-213 No.24 Vol.2014-HPC-147 No /12/10 GPU 1,a) 1,b) 1,c) 1,d) GPU GPU Structure Of Array Array Of

GPU 1,a) 1,b) 1,c) 1,d) GPU 1 GPU Structure Of Array Array Of Structure 1. MPS(Moving Particle Semi-Implicit) [1] SPH(Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics) [] DEM(Distinct Element Method)[] [] 1 Tokyo Institute

Erased_PDF.pdf

E 1/2 3/ () +3/2 +3/ () +1/2 +1/ / E [1] B (3.2) F E 4.1 y x E = (E x,, ) j y 4.1 E int = (, E y, ) j y = (Hall ef

4 213 5 8 4.1.1 () f A exp( E/k B ) f E = A [ k B exp E ] = f k B k B = f (2 E /3n). 1 k B /2 σ = e 2 τ(e)d(e) 2E 3nf 3m 2 E de = ne2 τ E m (4.1) E E τ E = τe E = / τ(e)e 3/2 f de E 3/2 f de (4.2) f (3.2)

42 3 u = (37) MeV/c 2 (3.4) [1] u amu m p m n [1] m H [2] m p = (4) MeV/c 2 = (13) u m n = (4) MeV/c 2 =

3 3.1 3.1.1 kg m s J = kg m 2 s 2 MeV MeV [1] 1MeV=1 6 ev = 1.62 176 462 (63) 1 13 J (3.1) [1] 1MeV/c 2 =1.782 661 731 (7) 1 3 kg (3.2) c =1 MeV (atomic mass unit) 12 C u = 1 12 M(12 C) (3.3) 41 42 3 u

Mｏｔｔ散乱によるParity対称性の破れを検証

Mott Parity P2 Mott target Mott Parity Parity Γ = 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 t P P ),,, ( 3 2 1 0 1 γ γ γ γ γ γ ν ν µ µ = = Γ 1 : : : Γ P P P P x x P ν ν µ µ vector axial vector ν ν µ µ γ γ Γ ν γ

3 6 6.1: ALMA 6.1 galaxy, galaxies the Galaxy, our Galaxy, Milky Way Galaxy G. Galilei W. Herschel cm J.C. Kapteyn H. Sharpley 30 E.P. Hubble 6.2 6.2.1 b l 6.2 b = 0 6.2: l = 0 6.2.2 6.1 6.3 ( 60-100µm)

ω 0 m(ẍ + γẋ + ω0x) 2 = ee (2.118) e iωt x = e 1 m ω0 2 E(ω). (2.119) ω2 iωγ Z N P(ω) = χ(ω)e = exzn (2.120) ϵ = ϵ 0 (1 + χ) ϵ(ω) ϵ 0 = 1 +

2.6 2.6.1 ω 0 m(ẍ + γẋ + ω0x) 2 = ee (2.118) e iωt x = e 1 m ω0 2 E(ω). (2.119) ω2 iωγ Z N P(ω) = χ(ω)e = exzn (2.120) ϵ = ϵ 0 (1 + χ) ϵ(ω) ϵ 0 = 1 + Ne2 m j f j ω 2 j ω2 iωγ j (2.121) Z ω ω j γ j f j

K E N Z U 2012 7 16 HP M. 1 1 4 1.1 3.......................... 4 1.2................................... 4 1.2.1..................................... 4 1.2.2.................................... 5................................

80 X 1, X 2,, X n ( λ ) λ P(X = x) = f (x; λ) = λx e λ, x = 0, 1, 2, x! l(λ) = n f (x i ; λ) = i=1 i=1 n λ x i e λ i=1 x i! = λ n i=1 x i e nλ n i=1 x

80 X 1, X 2,, X n ( λ ) λ P(X = x) = f (x; λ) = λx e λ, x = 0, 1, 2, x! l(λ) = n f (x i ; λ) = n λ x i e λ x i! = λ n x i e nλ n x i! n n log l(λ) = log(λ) x i nλ log( x i!) log l(λ) λ = 1 λ n x i n =

J-PARC E15 K K-pp Missing mass Invariant mass K - 3 He Formation K - pp cluster neutron Mode to decay charged particles p Λ π - Decay p Decay E15 dete

J-PARC E15 (TGEM-TPC) TGEM M1 ( ) J-PARC E15 TPC TGEM TGEM J-PARC E15 K K-pp Missing mass Invariant mass K - 3 He Formation K - pp cluster neutron Mode to decay charged particles p Λ π - Decay p Decay

untitled

0. =. =. (999). 3(983). (980). (985). (966). 3. := :=. A A. A A. := := 4 5 A B A B A B. A = B A B A B B A. A B A B, A B, B. AP { A, P } = { : A, P } = { A P }. A = {0, }, A, {0, }, {0}, {}, A {0}, {}.

untitled

SPring-8 RFgun JASRI/SPring-8 6..7 Contents.. 3.. 5. 6. 7. 8. . 3 cavity γ E A = er 3 πε γ vb r B = v E c r c A B A ( ) F = e E + v B A A A A B dp e( v B+ E) = = m d dt dt ( γ v) dv e ( ) dt v B E v E

1 Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt SSC-Caltech ,

397 0101 10762 30 e-mail: matsunaga@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 8 3 20 2 3 3 7 2 3 1. 100 1912 1 1 4 12 10 3 1 20 2,500 2 1 3 4 374 2012 6 1 Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/R. Hurt SSC-Caltech 3 2. 5 3 6 100 7 8, 9 10