4402ALL-“Å‘I

Similar documents
ベンチャー・キャピタル投資契約の

Ver. 1.0 (discretion) (revenue management) (fictitious revenue recognition) (window dressing) (fraudulent accounting practice) SEC (General

‰àŠZ†E‘Ø„fl”s‘ê‡Ì−î‚b™m”¯ - I

Ł\”ƒ1PDFŠp

ID JJF00296 Earnings management and market timing: The case of Japanese management buyouts Yasutomo Tsukioka 2-16 Japan Journal of Finance Vol.

AT A GLANCE INDIVIDUAL GROUP 63.72% 1, % At a Glance INSTITUTIONAL GROUP 34.26% % GLOBAL MARKETS GROUP 5.56% % 2

株式保有構成と企業価値 ─コーポレート・ガバナンスに関する一考察─

商学 59‐5・6/1.岡部

M&A の経済分析:M&A はなぜ増加したのか

Page

濱田弘潤 : 多角化企業の利潤分析 77 多角化企業の利潤分析 多角化ディスカウントの寡占理論による説明 * 濱田弘潤 (diversification discount) Keywords: JEL classifications: D43, L13, L22, G

A Message From President 2

戦間期日本企業の資金調達、資本コスト、資本構成:最適資本構成理論からみた1930年代における企業財務

野村資本市場研究所|JOBS法の成立と米国IPO市場の今後の動向(PDF)

Y-...W

) ,

headquarter Gertner et al. winner-picking Wal-Mart s

pdf01_2015_SeniorCloud04.indd

わが国企業による資金調達方法の選択問題

上場変更と株価:株主分散と流動性変化のインパクト

IPO における大手証券会社の引受と初期収益率 利益相反仮説の検証 IPO Underwriting by Major Security Houses and Initial Return: Testing Conflict of Interest Hypothesis 池田直史 (Naoshi I

野村資本市場研究所|ベイルインの導入に向けた検討-破綻時に債権の損失吸収を図る新たな措置-(PDF)

44-2 宮崎裕介.pwd

, 3, 1999, 4,,


富山バイオベンチャーフォーラム

2009 年 4 月 14 日掲載承認 IPO の過小値付け現象 新しい解釈の試み 金子 隆 IPO IPO IPO PO PO IPO IPO IPO IPO Initial Public Offering IPO Offering IPO going public

text.dvi

_™rfic

⑤香取 徹.indd

23_02.dvi

2006

FINANCIAL FACT BOOK 2002 CONTENTS CONTENTS Sales Data Net Sales Sales Composition Sales by Region Profit Data Cost Composition & Operating Income/Net

東アジアの企業統治と企業法制改革 扉.indd

IDEC Report 2015 IDEC Report 2015

untitled

6) 7) MBO management buy-out 2 necessity sufficiency ) 21

206“ƒŁ\”ƒ-fl_“H„¤‰ZŁñ

Title ベンチャー企業の研究開発支出の決定要因 日本と台湾の事例を中心に Author(s) 蘇, 顯揚 Citation 經濟論叢 (1996), 158(1): Issue Date URL Right

キャッシュ・フロー経営とキャッシュ・フロー計算書

A5 PDF.pwd

<8DEC90AC97702E657073>

証券市場の機能と証券業務

(1)... 8 (2)... 8 (3) (1)... 9 (2) (3) DCF (4) (1) (2) (3) (1

Change in Organization Mode and Asymmetric Personal Information via Corporate Group Management Resolution 1 asymmetric information,2003a symmetric ign

A Message From President 2 Kanamoto examiner vo.18

Page

高齢化とマクロ投資比率―国際パネルデータを用いた分析―

PhillipCapital Your Partner In Finance

1 Annual Report 212

[1987][2000] Awareness

2017年12月期 決算説明資料

IFRS Business Model IASB 2010b, Purpose and status, a and b IASB IFRS IFRS IFRS IASB IFRS IFRS Principles-Based Standard Tweedie 2007 Tweedie 2007, p.

産業21-81号.72.indd


2 4 8 UFJ UFJ 3 CS 32 IT ALM UFJ 117 UFJ 153 UFJ

,255 7, ,355 4,452 3,420 3,736 8,206 4, , ,992 6, ,646 4,

Financial Highlights 7,92,326 9,287 7,38 3,994 93,438 2,27 3,28,84,97,8 26,336 8,8 8,27,243 77,99 23,72 49,676 4,7,992 9,429 7,48 3,939 9,67 3,82 37,2

Ł\”ƒ.eps

海外における協同組織金融機関の現状

第43巻第2号【論説】固定資産の費用化と評価に関する現代的課題

_03.indd

わが国企業による株主還元策の決定要因:配当・自社株消却のインセンティブを巡る実証分析

米国JOBS法による証券規制の変革

bc0710_010_015.indd

untitled

130 Oct Radial Basis Function RBF Efficient Market Hypothesis Fama ) 4) 1 Fig. 1 Utility function. 2 Fig. 2 Value function. (1) (2)

Title Author(s) フェア ディスクロージャー ルールとアナリスト行動 石川, 徹 Citation 大阪大学経済学. 67(2-3-4) P.40-P.50 Issue Date Text Version publisher URL

わが国証券市場、証券業界の戦後70年

aragciv54mac.dvi

29 Short-time prediction of time series data for binary option trade

住友不動産販売 NEW YORK

Channel to Discovery Plan &


4303ALL-“Å‘I

業績報告|ディスクロージャー│チューリッヒ|Business Report 2008 会社概要編

Microsoft Word - 蜀・伐豬ゥ蠕ウ

1 CAPM: I-,,, I- ( ) 1 I- I- I- ( CAPM) I- CAPM I- 1 I- Jensen Fama-French 3 I- Fama-French 3 I- Fama-MacBeth I- SMB-FL, HML-FL Fama-MacBeth 1 Fama-Fr

JST05-08.indd

公的機関が関与した企業再生支援

???

‚æ6“ƒ/Ł\1-Ł\4

OSIPP40_p1_2.eps

Becoming the Greatest Lifestyle Company FACT BOOK 2004

1999 SME

坪沼

商学 66‐2☆/3.大原

Microsoft Word - Šv”|.DOC

海保英孝111‐131/111‐131

担保報告書.PDF

OECD Benartzi and Thaler Brown et al. Mottla and Utkus Rooiji et al. Atkinson et al. MacFarland et al. Elton et al. Tang et al. Benartzi and Thaler Br

Ann. Phytopath. Soc. Japan 53 (3). July,

英国のFunding Agency としてのResearch Councils の役割

autocorrelataion cross-autocorrelataion Lo/MacKinlay [1988, 1990] (A)

Doing Business in California: Venture Capital Financing – Part 3: Basics of Preferred Stock Transactions


Tran Thi Van Anh

Blue Ocean Strategy W. Chan Kim A. Mauborgne INSEAD INSEAD Production and Operations Management PhD Value Innovation Kim & Mauborgne, 1997

2011上宮太子_高校_学校案内

Contents 3 Financial Highlights (Consolidated) Consolidated Balance Sheets Financials in comparison with competitors (Consolidated Consolid

Transcription:

442 2007 7 IPO VC BO VC BO M&A IPO MBO VC IPO BO restructuring reorganization recapitalization VC BO GDP GDP VC 10 VC VC30 2002 12 http://www.jvca.jp/2007 3 171-8588 1-5-1 TEL DI 03-5992-4382 Fax 03-5992-1007 E-mail: Kenichi.Tatsumi@gakushuin.ac.jp IPO VC VC VB VB VC

VC VC 2000 IT 2000 1000 10 3 22 1 BO 2006 2 5000 07 3 25 VC exit IPO VC BO IPO 2006 (a) 2006 (b) 2006 (c) 2-1 deal screening evaluationdue diligence deal structuring, strikingpost-investment activities 2001 10 1 1 VC 2002 VC VC VC 1 IT

IPO VC BO 2-1-1 1 entrepreneurship 3 DCF 2 exitipo (sell-out, trade sales) a IPO bsell-out 4 M&A VB MBI secondary sale trade sale VB c buy-back redemption VC VB d e 5 d DCF discount cash flow method

IPOIPO M&A IPO VB ) VC 2-1-2 1 VC VB 2 VC VB VC VB VB VB VB 3 VC 2 VC VB VC VC 1 (hands-on) M&A VC 2002

IPO VC BO VC VB VC 2000 IT 3 VC preferred stock purchase agreement 2002 IT VC VC Fenwick & West. 2002 74 VC 11% corporate reorganizations 70%30%IT hands-onvc VC IRR internal rate of return VC IRR 2000VECVC IRR IRR IRR 100 IRR 1999 12 19.8% IRR 2002 VEC VC GDP VC TOPIX JASDAQ TOPIX IPO M&A IPO VC VC VC MBA VB

2002 VC VC 4 BO VC BO TOB 3 2 BO TOB restructuring reorganization recapitalization BO BO VC BO VC 1 WSJ 2007 3 27

IPO VC BO 2-2 2003 1 NDA VC VB NDA non disclosure agreement VC NDA 2 LOI LOI letter of intent VC VB LOI VC LOI 3 3 due diligence VC VC LOI VB VC review VC 4 4 deal structure term sheet VC VC 1 VB

2-3 Gomper-Shalman 2002 2002 2002 2003 Metrick 2006 IPO VC IPO financial covenants 2-3-1 VC VB VC VB VC VB VC VB VC VC 2-3-2 1 VC pre-emptive rights IPO VC VC VB VC 2 VC co-sale right M&A VC VC

IPO VC BO 3 VC stage investment VB VC hands-on 3.5 1 20 10 5 5 2-3-3 VC preferred stock 11 common stock 1 2 1 anti-dilution provi- 2007 2 9 EADS 15 2010 7 EADS 10 2006 6 12 20 2006 6 13 11 2003 2001 9

sions VC 2002 20% full ratchet anti-dilution 78% weighted average anti-dilution 2% payto-play provisions 2002 18% pay-to-play pay-to-play 50% 33% 2 MLP 2 (liquidation preference) CP convertible preferred stock VC 1000 VC 5100 1 5 66 66 VC 5100 4000 VC % VC VC IT VC 2X 3X VC 2 3 MLP multiple liquidation preference MLP VB

IPO VC BO 2 3 MLP VC VB 2002 56% senior liquidation preferencevb 41% provided for a multiple preference 87% 1.5 2 3 13% 3 PCP participating convertible preferred stock, convertible preferred stock provided for participation Metrick (2006) 2002 67% VC 56% 2-3-4 VBVC 1 VB 2005 4 MGM 20 2 vesting Metrick (2006)

cliff vesting 25 stage vesting VC Gomper-Shalman (2002) VC 3 VB VC VC buy-back redemption 2002 44% a b 2 VC 2-4 VB VC VC 1 2 2005, pp.70-71 IPO IPO secondary share offering IPO IPO secondary share offering primary share offering

IPO VC BO primary secondary VC IPO 1 3-1 Li-Klein (2006) IPO 60.787.4 39.3 12.6 2.0 2 IPO Li-Klein (2006) 3 IPO IPO Li-Klein (2006) IPO IPO IPO 3-4 R&D OLS IPO R&D

3-2 2004 IPO 1996 1999 4 JASDAQ IPO 346 87.3 90.3 4 88.7 3 2 50 VC 5 IPO 40 10 40 17 88.7 39.3 40 12.6 2 2 3 VC 3-3 IPO IPO IPO

IPO VC BO IPO 84.4 VC VC VB 3-4 IPO friends and family program 3-4-1 directed share program DSP IPO 2 3 10 DSP DSP Ray 20061999 10 262003 8 17 416 IPO 98 ADR 113 153 9 LBO IPO17 2 mutual to stock conversions IPO 12 9 2 IPO 1496 Nasdaq IPO 92 IPO 87 DSP DSP 7.4 IPO 12 20 the priority subscription rights the subscription price IPO

DSP 6.8 9 3-4-2 IPO DSP IPO 1 13 1 IPO IPO 2 DSP 3 DSP DSP DSP DSP DSP 13 Ray 2006

IPO VC BO IPO 180 DSP DSP DSP Ray 2006DSP IPO 67 DSP IPO DSP IPO 40 29 DSP 3-4-3 NYSE/NASDAQ IPO advisory committee (2003) DSP IPO DSP 5 SEC DSP 1 DSP DSP Ray 2006DSP DSP DSP DSP IPO 7 IPO IPO 5 10 1 0 0 DSP DSP DSP DSP DSP IPO IPO 5 10 1 0

5 DSP FIML DSP DSP DSP DSP DSP DSP IPO 1 IPO 4 1 0 Ray 2006DSP DSP DSP DSP DSP 2 Ray 2006 IPO DSP DSP DSP

IPO VC BO 3-4-4 Ray 2006 14 DSP IPO 1 DSP DSP Ray 2006 DSP 2 2 Ray 2006 0 CEO 5 founder-chairman 6 DSPDSP 9 14 2 14 Ray 2006 2000 3 16 2 Ray 2006

1 2006 (a) 2006 (b) 2006 (c) Brau, J., Francis, B. and Kohers, N., The choice of IPO versus takeover: empirical evidence, Journal of Business, 2003, 21, pp. 3-40. ATTRACTING INVESTORS, 2004 PHP 2005 9 VC GVC IPO #24 2002 9 INTERNET MAGAZINE 2002 1 VC INTERNET MAGAZINE 2003 4 Gomper, P. A. and Shalman, W. A., Entrepreneurial Finance, A Case Book, John Wiley, 2002. Lian, Q. and Wang, Q., The Dual Tracking Puzzle: IPO Plans Turn into Mergers, May 2006. Li, M. and Klein, D., Factors Affecting Secondary Share Offerings In The IPO Process, August, 2006 ( Market Timing, Window Dressing, And Secondary Offerings In The IPO Process, Paper presented at FMA Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, Oct. 2006). Metrick, A. Venture Capital and the Finance of Innovation, John Wiley & Sons, 2006. Muscarella, C. J. and Vetsuypens, M. R., Efficiency and Organizational Structure: A Study of Reverse LBOs, Journal of Finance, December 1990, pp. 1389-1413. Qin, L., Does The Market Penalize Second-Time-Successful Ipos? Paper presented at FMA Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, Oct. 2006. Ray. R., Directed Share Programs in IPO Underwriting and Agency Problems, July 30, 2006 (Paper presented at EFA 2006 Zurich Meetings). Vol.22/NO.2, 2002, pp.150-164 a IPO 2006 1 pp.231-249 b IPO 2006 4 pp.53-71 c IPO 2006 7 pp.223-245 2004 7