パーソナリティ研究2006 第14巻 第2号 214–226

Similar documents

(2002a) (1) American Psychiatric Association, (1985) (1989) 1985 (1998) (1999a) (2) 1995 Grotevant, 1998 Leary, T


The Japanese Journal of Health Psychology, 29(S): (2017)

不安障害研究, 9(1), 17-32, 2017

THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY 2007, Vol. 15 No. 2, 217–227

Newgarten, BL., Havighrst, RJ., & Tobin, S.Life Satisfaction Index-A LSIDiener. E.,Emmons,R.A.,Larsen,R.J.,&Griffin,S. The Satisfaction With Life Scal

大谷教育福祉研究 39号☆/1.熊野

2 251 Barrera, 1986; Barrera, e.g., Gottlieb, 1985 Wethington & Kessler 1986 r Cohen & Wills,

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1991, Vol. 62, No. 3, A study on the reliability and validity of a scale to measure shyness as a trait Atsu

20 Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 1989, 37, 20 \28 THE WILLINGNESS OF SELF-DISCLOSURE AND THE DEVIATION FROM NORMATIVE SELF-DISCLOSURE IN

66-1 田中健吾・松浦紗織.pwd

Jpn. J. Personality 19(2): (2010)

272 11) 12) 1 Barrera 13) 1fl social embeddedness 2fl perceived support 3fl enacted support 3 14) 15) 3 2fl 13) 16;17) 1 14;15;18 21) 2 22;23) 4 24;25

パーソナリティ研究 2005 第13巻 第2号 231–241

Jpn. J. Personality 18(2): (2009)

Jpn. J. Personality 19(2): (2010)

パーソナリティ研究 2005 第13巻 第2号 170–182


02[ ]小山・池田(責)岩.indd

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1987, VoL58, No. 1, A Japanese version of the Sensation-Seeking Scale Masaharu Terasaki (Department of Psycho

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

220 28;29) 30 35) 26;27) % 8.0% 9 36) 8) 14) 37) O O 13 2 E S % % 2 6 1fl 2fl 3fl 3 4

Males are Susceptible to Unrequited Love: Development of the Benefits and Tsukasa KATO MY ALL Jungle Smile SEVENTH HEAVENPerfumeOh! YeahOR- ANGE RANGE

Jpn. J. Personality 19(2): (2010)

人文論究53―4(よこ)新/1.中澤

05_藤田先生_責

Juntendo Medical Journal

DSM A TIME HIROSHIMA CD HIROSHIMA 2013 NHK CD 1996 B B A B

50 Planned Happenstance Parsons Brown Brooks, Gelatt Gelatt 1962 Gelatt, positive uncertainty nonrational Gelatt, 1

SH (2004)GSE GSE SH GSESH GSE SHGSE SHGSE II A Y T J W (1) 103

IR0036_62-3.indb

J53-01

パーソナリティ研究 2004 第13 巻 第1 号 79–90

Vol. 52 No ,332,000 1,638, ,774 8 A ,11, II. A. % % B. 500 A A N=353

< D8A778B E631318D86>

Visual Evaluation of Polka-dot Patterns Yoojin LEE and Nobuko NARUSE * Granduate School of Bunka Women's University, and * Faculty of Fashion Science,

A 18 B 6 AB p >0.05 A1A2B1B2 A3B3 t p > ο =0 1 =12 =2 0 ο14 10=0ο= ο144 0 ο4041ο64 65ο144 WAIS R Wilcoxon

Development of the Japanese version of the Purpose in Life scale and an investigation of its factors. Abstract This study aims to develop the Japanese


untitled

Table 1 Means and standard deviations of topic familiarity for the topics used in the study Note. standard deviations are in parenthesis.

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

Title ポジティブ側面への積極的注目に関する研究 : ポジティブ志向, 主観的幸福感, ネガティブ認知, 他者軽視との関連 ( fulltext ) Author(s) 高橋, 誠 ; 森本, 哲介 Citation 学校教育学研究論集 (26): Issue Date


03小塩真司.indd

研究論集Vol.16-No.2.indb

J. Jpn. Acad. Nurs. Sci. 35: (2015)

e.g., Mahoney, Vandell, Simpkins, & Zarrett, Bohnert, Fredricks, & Randall2010 breadth intensitydurationengagement e.g., Mahone


人文論究65‐4(よこ)(P)Y☆/4.高橋



Jpn. J. Personality 21(1): (2012)


Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

Fig. 2 Signal plane divided into cell of DWT Fig. 1 Schematic diagram for the monitoring system

大谷女子大学紀要(よこ)51☆/7.田沢


01松並.indd

研究成果報告書(基金分)

Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 1995, 43, A JAPANESE VERSION OF THE GENERALIZED SELF-EFFICACY SCALE Scale utility from the life sp

仏大 社会学部論集47号(P)/6.山口

本文/宮川充司先生

On Japanese empathy and interpretation IKEDA, Masatoshi In this paper I compared it with empathy as a manner of psychotherapist about interpretation a

Human Welfare 8‐1☆/4.坂口

, , % :

The Journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Administration and Policies Vol 12, No 1, pp 49 59, 2008 資料 看護師におけるメンタリングとキャリア結果の関連 Relationship between M


パーソナリティ研究 2006 第14巻 第3号 281–292

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 2000, Vol. 71, No. 3, Emotion recognition: Facial components associated with various emotions Ken Gouta and

3 career exploration Stumph, Colarelli, & Hartman, 1983 self-exploration environment exploration 2 Stumph et al., Effortful Control: EC

(’Ó)”R

評論・社会科学 124号(P)☆/1.鰺坂

Jap. J. of Educ. Psychol., 1985, 33, 295 \306 A STUDY ON EGO IDENTITY IN MIDDLE AGE Yuko OKAMOTO The purposes of this study were to clarify the charac


スポーツ教育学研究(2013. Vol.33, No1, pp.1-13)



25 D Effects of viewpoints of head mounted wearable 3D display on human task performance

〈論文〉高校生の学校適応と社会的スキルおよびソーシャルサポートとの関連--不登校生徒との比較

+深見将志.indd

Rubin Rubin

”Лï‡Æ™²“¸_‚æ4“ƒ__‘dflÅPDF‘‚‡«‘o‡µ.pdf

’lŁ¶Ÿ_‰ƒ52†\1(‡æ‡±)/9.‘¼™ƒ‰v”À”q

) 5 Lawton QOL 4 4 QOL Lawton 4) Philadelphia Geriatric Center Affect Rating ScaleARS ARS QOL 5) HDS R

- Expander AND eating disorders AND women eating disorders women OR eating disorders AND women OR self-esteem eating disorders women self-esteem NOT e

社会言語学:その仕組み、展望と社会の中での言葉遣いについて

<915391CC348D5A F F815B312E706466>

untitled

untitled

202

Perspective-Taking Perspective-Taking.... Vol. No.

‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹

02二宮.indd


評論・社会科学 85号(よこ)(P)/3.佐分

RTM RTM Risk terrain terrain RTM RTM 48

市区町村別平均寿命の全国順位の変化からみた青森県市町村平均寿命の解析

Transcription:

2006 14 2 214 226 2006 (NPI-35) 1) Raskin & Hall (1979) Emmons (1984) (Narcissistic Personality Inventory; NPI) Raskin & Terry (1988) NPI (Narcissistic Personality Inventory-35; NPI-35) 1 35 5 2 3 4 NPI-35 NPI-35 Narcissistic Personality Inventory-35 Kernberg (1975) Raskin & Hall (1981) DSM-III (APA, 1980) (Narcissistic Personality Disorder) 1) 16 (2003) 1991 2001 Raskin & Hall (1979) 80 Narcissistic Personality Inventory NPI Raskin & Hall (1981) Emmons (1984, 1987) Raskin & Terry (1988)Emmons (1984) 4 54 NPI Raskin & Terry (1988)

(NPI-35) 215 Emmons (1984) NPI 7 40 (1986) Emmons (1984) NPI DSM-III Millon (1981) 60 5 3 42 (1987) NPI (Raskin & Hall, 1979) 4 54 NPI (1985) (1991) Raskin & Hall (1979) Emmons (1984) NPI NPI (1998) Narcissistic Personality Inventory-Short version NPI-S NPI-S (1987) NPI 3 30 NPI-S 4 NPI-S Raskin & Terry (1988) NPI-S NPI-S DSM-IV- TR (APA, 2002) Raskin & Terry (1988) NPI Raskin & Terry (1988) NPI NPI Raskin & Hall (1979) Emmons (1984) NPI NPI-S 1998

216 14 2 1 Raskin & Terry (1988) NPI 2 3 4 1 1992 1998 1 Raskin & Terry (1988) NPI 2) 330 152 178 19.24 SD 1.16 19.20 SD 1.53 Raskin & Terry (1988) 40 NPI 1 6 6 2) Robert Raskin Howard Terry Robert Hogan (cf. Raskin, Novacek & Hogan, 1991) 40 t (t(295) 0.76, n. s.) 40 Promax 5.40 2 5 35 5 Table 1 Promax Cronbach a 1 10 1 2 8 2 3 9 3 4

(NPI-35) 217 Table 1 NPI-35 Promax (N 330) I II III IV V I. 18..73.19.15.09.17.59 20..69.13.08.15.03.47 30..68.00.15.12.03.67 12..68.23.01.07.00.59 26..67.21.10.02.00.43 27..63.24.07.08.10.51 7..61.05.13.17.13.55 14..43.31.00.00.05.42 38..42.06.07.09.14.28 25..41.17.05.10.10.24 II. 39..01.86.01.06.12.75 40..11.77.09.03.10.71 9..01.68.11.08.02.64 34..07.64.04.14.09.67 8..08.59.04.08.10.48 5..04.47.01.21.02.18 37..17.43.04.03.12.30 13..06.41.23.04.15.36 III. 11..03.07.64.20.06.38 2..02.01.63.21.16.30 33..17.08.61.14.01.52 36..05.19.60.10.05.61 10..01.17.59.03.07.55 3..05.05.49.05.05.23 1..02.14.47.10.06.34 32..04.26.41.07.24.56 23..10.04.41.01.17.26 IV. 29..07.06.04.79.03.61 19..04.06.13.75.03.49 15..12.18.05.51.03.43 V. 22..10.01.07.04.60.35 6..09.35.02.12.46.37 17..22.34.08.14.46.22 21..04.10.04.04.45.24 35..05.07.25.20.41.46 4.48 4.92 3.69 2.32 1.72 (%) 12.81 26.88 37.42 44.06 48.98 a.88.86.83.76.62 I.45.43.48.10 II.59.49.37 III.42.33 IV -.22

218 14 2 3 4 5 5 5 a.62.88 a.92 35 NPI-35 Table 2 NPI-35 Raskin & Terry (1988) NPI 7 5 Raskin & Terry (1988) 2 1987 Table 2 NPI-35 (N 330) NPI-35 111.75 (22.93) 37.07 (8.87) 22.48 (7.45) 27.46 (7.33) 6.89 (2.81) 17.86 (3.65) 1995 (Taylor & Brown, 1988, 1994) 2001 2 2 5 DSM-IV-TR (APA, 2002) (1987)

(NPI-35) 219 (2000) Raskin & Terry (1988) 1 35 NPI-35 2 2 1 NPI-35 1 237 95 142 19.60 SD 1.49 18.96 SD 0.88 10 1 NPI-35 1 6 Table 3 NPI-35 (N 557) I. II. III. IV. V. 18..75 20..61 30..83 12..73 26..60 27..71 7..77 14..61 38..52 25..44 39..86 40..86 9..81 34..81 8..70 5..39 37..50 13..54 11..52 2..38 33..75 36..86 10..83 3..40 1..56 32..70 23..47 29..70 19..83 15..72 22..47 6..57 17..24 21..54 35..69 I II III IV V I.67.63.55.29 II.78.48.62 III.43.62 IV.30

220 14 2 1 NPI-35 2 SAS CALIS 5 Table 3 1 GFI.73 AGFI.70 CFI.80 5 5 NPI-35 Cronbah a.94.89.88.84.81.71 2 3 4 3 NPI-35 I-T G-P 2 131 45 86 21.36 SD 1.57 20.71 SD 1.25 1 2002 11 153 53 100 21.40 SD 1.56 20.75 SD 1.25 NPI-35 8 NPI-35 2 2002 11 2003 1 NPI-35 2 1 I-T (r(151).24.56, p.01) NPI-35 NPI-35 109 109 G-P (t 1.99 11.86, p.05) NPI-35 t Welch 131 151 NPI-35 8 2 Table 4.77.86 a NPI-35.69.93 Table 4 NPI-35 a (N 131) a NPI-35.86.93 I..80.85 II..85.86 III..84.81 IV..78.83 V..77.69

(NPI-35) 221 NPI-35 4 4 NPI-35 NPI-35 NPI-S 1998 Edwards Personal Preference Schedule EPPS; Edwards, 1954 1986 1982 NPI-35 NPI-35 NPI-S NPI-35 NPI-S NPI-35 NPI-S NPI-35 NPI-S NPI-35 NPI-S NPI-35 NPI-S NPI- 35 3 NPI-S NPI-35 NPI-35 NPI-35 (1997) NPI-S (1982) Rosenberg (1965) 2 98 34 64 21.35 SD 1.15 20.78 SD 1.36 1. NPI-35 1, 2, 3 6 2. NPI-S 1998 1 5 5 3. EPPS (Edwards, 1954) Edwards (1954) Murray (1938) 15 (1970) 9 (1970)

222 14 2 Table 5 NPI-35 (N 98) NPI-35 I II III IV V NPI-S EPPS NPI-35.824***.911***.867***.462***.682***.787***.649***.588***.554***.560***.504***.375*** I..640***.614***.212*.420***.670***.371***.744***.354***.613***.642***.049 II..731***.409***.673***.687***.653***.419***.516***.484***.368***.435*** III..334***.482***.744***.595***.529***.571***.457***.431***.393*** IV..205*.313**.443***.114.194.214*.070.315** V..467***.505***.147.453***.195.164.396*** * p.05, ** p.01, *** p.001 1 5 5 4. (1986) 5 1 5 5 5. (1982) Rosenberg (1965) 10 (1982) 10 1 5 5 2 4 1 NPI-35 2 NPI-S EPPS 2002 11 2002 12 NPI-35 NPI-35 Table 5 NPI-35 NPI-35 NPI-35 NPI-S NPI-35 NPI-S NPI-35 EPPS NPI-35 NPI-S NPI-S NPI-S NPI-S NPI-S NPI-S NPI-S

(NPI-35) 223 NPI-35 Rosenberg (1965) NPI-35 NPI-S NPI- S NPI-35 NPI-S NPI-S NPI-S NPI-35 NPI-35 NPI- 35 NPI-35 Raskin & Terry (1988) NPI DSM-IV-TR (APA, 2002) 1 4 1 5 35 2 5 3 4 4

224 14 2 NPI- 35 NPI-35 5 (e.g., Raskin & Hall, 1981; Mullins & Kopelman, 1988) (1987) (1997) NPI-35 4 NPI-35 NPI-S NPI-S NPI-35 2 NPI-35 American Psychiatric Association 1980 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition: DSM-III. Washington, D. C.: Author. American Psychiatric Association 2002 Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Forth Edition Text Revised: DSM- -TR. Washington, D. C.: Author. Edwards, A. L. 1954 Edwards personal preference schedule. New York: The Psychological Corporation. Emmons, R. A. 1984 Factor analysis and construct validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 291 300. Emmons, R. A. 1987 Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11 17. 1992 1970 EPPS Kernberg, O. F. 1975 Borderline conditions and pathological narcissism. New York: Jackson Aronson. 1995 35, 133 163. 1998 Millon, T. 1981 Disorders of personality: DSM-III, Axis II. New York: Wiley. 1991 39, 199 213.

(NPI-35) 225 1991 39, 455 460. 1985 (1) 1, 51 61. Mullins, L. S., & Kopelman, R. E. 1988 Toward an assessment of the construct validity of four measures of narcissism. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52, 610 625. Murray, H. A. 1938 Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press. 2000 40, 192 197. 1987 (1) 29 534 535. 1997 44, 155 163. 1998 45, 45 53. 2001 10, 35 44. Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. 1979 A narcissistic personality inventory. Psychological Reports, 45, 590. Raskin, R., & Hall, C. S. 1981 The narcissistic personality inventory: Alternate form reliability and further evidence of construct validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 159 162. Raskin, R., & Terry, H. 1988 A principal-components analysis of the narcissistic personality inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 890 902. Raskin, R., Novacek, J., & Hogan, R. 1991 Narcissism, selfesteem, and defensive self-enhancement. Journal of Personality, 59, 19 38. Rosenberg, M. 1965 Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1986 (NPI) 16, 77 86. 1986 2 57, 134 140. 1987 27, 27 36. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. 1988 Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193 210. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. 1994 Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21 27. 2001 72, 329 335. 1982 30, 64 68. 2005. 4. 28 2005. 10. 31

226 14 2 Development of Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI-35) Mizuho KONISHI 1, Masako OKAWA 1 and Tsukasa HASHIMOTO 2 1 Department of Psychiatry, Shiga University of Medical Science 2 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Letters, Doshisha University THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY 2006, Vol. 14 NO. 2, 214 226 In Japan, many researchers have studied narcissistic personality using Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI: Raskin & Hall, 1979; Emmons, 1984); however, different response formats were used and inconsistent factors found by different researchers. We tried to develop a new Japanese version of NPI, after the inventory by Raskin and Terry (1988). In Study 1, we explored internal structure of the scale through factor analysis, and found five factors: need for attention, sense of grandeur, leadership, praise for the body, and self conviction. We named it Narcissistic Personality Inventory-35 (NPI-35). In Study 2, the five factors found in Study 1 were verified by confirmatory factor analysis on the data of another sample. Study 3 showed that NPI-35 had sufficient test-retest reliability. Finally, in Study 4, we investigated validity in terms of the correlations between NPI-35 and NPI-Short version (Oshio, 1998), exhibitionism scale (Edwards, 1953), praise seeking scale (Sugawara, 1986), and self-esteem scale (Rosenberg, 1965). It was demonstrated that the fullscale NPI-35 and its component scales had good correlational validity. Key words: narcissism, Narcissistic Personality Inventory-35, reliability, validity