els08ws-kuroda-slides.key

Similar documents
Corrected Version NICT /11/15, 1 Thursday, May 7,

( ) ( ) Modified on 2009/05/24, 2008/09/17, 15, 12, 11, 10, 09 Created on 2008/07/02 1 1) ( ) ( ) (exgen Excel VBA ) 2)3) 1.1 ( ) ( ) : : (1) ( ) ( )

IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2010-NL-199 No /11/ treebank ( ) KWIC /MeCab / Morphological and Dependency Structure Annotated Corp


助詞「に」の定量的分析の試み

‰gficŒõ/’ÓŠ¹


A Japanese Word Dependency Corpus ÆüËܸì¤Îñ¸ì·¸¤ê¼õ¤±¥³¡¼¥Ñ¥¹

null element [...] An element which, in some particular description, is posited as existing at a certain point in a structure even though there is no

6 68

独立行政法人情報通信研究機構 Development of the Information Analysis System WISDOM KIDAWARA Yutaka NICT Knowledge Clustered Group researched and developed the infor

NINJAL Project Review Vol.3 No.3

本文/YAZ325T

Q [4] 2. [3] [5] ϵ- Q Q CO CO [4] Q Q [1] i = X ln n i + C (1) n i i n n i i i n i = n X i i C exploration exploitation [4] Q Q Q ϵ 1 ϵ 3. [3] [5] [4]

1 ( ) (1) (2) Pattern 1 (P1)// Pattern 2 (P2) (V1 = V2) (alternation) (SPRAY-PAINT alternation/ hypallage) (1) (2) P1: (Z ) X Y V1 P2: (Z ) X Y

ARDJ-at-NLP24-slides.key

TALC Teaching and Language Corpora Wichmann et al. ; Kettemann & Marko ; Burnard & McEnery ; Aston ; Hunston ; Granger et al. ; Tan ; Sinclair ; Aston

...C...{ ren

自然言語処理21_249

128 ( ) ( put on) 1. wear, put on, take off, (1988: 214) rice 1 rice ( (1990) ) (1980) McCawley (1978) rice barley, wheat, oats, rye 2 SO

36 Theoretical and Applied Linguistics at Kobe Shoin No. 20, 2017 : Key Words: syntactic compound verbs, lexical compound verbs, aspectual compound ve

philology : philology linguistics : a. langue b. c. d. a. langue competence b. parole performance 1

untitled

Modal Phrase MP because but 2 IP Inflection Phrase IP as long as if IP 3 VP Verb Phrase VP while before [ MP MP [ IP IP [ VP VP ]]] [ MP [ IP [ VP ]]]


148_hayatsu.indd

(1)

2004年度版「労働組合の会計税務に係る実務マニュアル」の販売について

untitled

fi„‚å-‰³‹ç−w„¤‰ƒ‰IŠv48Ł\1-4.ai

SEJulyMs更新V7

02

( )

145_mori.indd


( ) (NICT) JCLA Workshop 09/18/2004

[4], [5] [6] [7] [7], [8] [9] 70 [3] 85 40% [10] Snowdon 50 [5] Kemper [3] 2.2 [11], [12], [13] [14] [15] [16]

シリコンバレーとルート128における地域産業システムのその後の展開―経営学輪講 Saxenian (1994)

( ) ( ) (action chain) (Langacker 1991) ( 1993: 46) (x y ) x y LCS (2) [x ACT-ON y] CAUSE [BECOME [y BE BROKEN]] (1999: 215) (1) (1) (3) a. * b. * (4)


9_18.dvi


of one s information (hearsay, personal experience, traditional lore), or epistemological stance may be expected of all speakers. This is especially t

11_寄稿論文_李_再校.mcd


1

平成12年度 対日直接投資増加の理由と日本経済にもたらす影響に関する調査 第2章 対日投資と多国籍企業の戦略について

kut-paper-template.dvi

58 1 Labov (1972) narrative (temporal juncture) (narrative clause) narrative Labov (1972) narrative Labov and Waletzkey (1967) narrative q Abstractw O

( : A9TB2096)


駒田朋子.indd


IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2011-MUS-91 No /7/ , 3 1 Design and Implementation on a System for Learning Songs by Presenting Musical St

¥ì¥·¥Ô¤Î¸À¸ì½èÍý¤Î¸½¾õ

Grice (1957) S x p S A x 1. A p 2. A S 1 3. A S 1 p (intention-based semantics) S p x (Strawson 1964; Grice 1969; Schiffer 1972; Harman 1974; Bennett


5temp+.indd

@08470030ヨコ/篠塚・窪田 221号


i JR NPO NPO 18

02_岡本慎平 様.indd


2006 3


2006年ワークショップ

橡自動車~1.PDF

01-望月.indd

腎不全-第22回.indd

* 1 e CD-ROM e e e 3 e e e CD-ROM DVD CBT(Computer Based Training) e 2002 e e electronic( ) WBT Web Based Training on-demand IT e e 1 y

English for Specific Purposes

2 / 24


% 95% 2002, 2004, Dunkel 1986, p.100 1

No. 3 Oct The person to the left of the stool carried the traffic-cone towards the trash-can. α α β α α β α α β α Track2 Track3 Track1 Track0 1

NO95-1_62173.pdf

【教】⑩山森直人先生【本文】/【教】⑩山森直人先生【本文】

白井学習法(1).ppt

外国語教育センタージャーナル第9号

21 Pitman-Yor Pitman- Yor [7] n -gram W w n-gram G Pitman-Yor P Y (d, θ, G 0 ) (1) G P Y (d, θ, G 0 ) (1) Pitman-Yor d, θ, G 0 d 0 d 1 θ Pitman-Yor G

NLC配布用.ppt

& Vol.5 No (Oct. 2015) TV 1,2,a) , Augmented TV TV AR Augmented Reality 3DCG TV Estimation of TV Screen Position and Ro

/™Z‚å‰IŠv‚æ36“ƒ /fi¡„´“NŠm†€

(’Ó)”R

m City Lights 1931 DIE 3 GROSCHEN-OPER G.W Blackmail 1929 DVD M M 1931Vampyr 1932

1 1 tf-idf tf-idf i

COM COM 4) 5) COM COM 3 4) 5) COM COM 6) 7) 10) COM Bonanza 6) Bonanza Hearts COM 7) 10) Hearts 3 2,000 4,000

社会システム研究21_ 畠山.indd

07 mokuroku final.indd


emarketer SNS / SNS 2009 SNS 15 64

1_26.dvi

4 Iwatani Hiroshi videre theca

Mizuki Kaneda and Naoyuki Osaka (Kyoto University) The Japanese Journal of Psychology 2007, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp

TF-IDF TDF-IDF TDF-IDF Extracting Impression of Sightseeing Spots from Blogs for Supporting Selection of Spots to Visit in Travel Sat


,

untitled

/ p p


Transcription:

NICT 26 2008/11/15, Word Sketch Engine (Kilgarriff & Tugwell 01; Srdanovic, et al. 08) ( ) I-Language Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage (Newmeyer 03)

(is-a ) ( )?? () // () ()????

? ( )?? ( ) Web

?? (examples) (antiexamples) () vs. * ( ) anti-examples programming/object-oriented design ( (anti-matter) )? () ( ) Fast Mapping ( & Smith 07, 08) (e.g., (Sutton & Barto 98), Memory-based Learning (Daelemans & van den Bosch 05); ( & 08))

() (e.g.,, ) Word Sketch Engine (Kilgarriff & Tugwell 01, Srdanovic, et al. 08, 08) Sketch Engine (Word) Sketch Engine (e.g., ) SkE SkE JpWaC 409,384,405 (BNC 4 ) Web http://nl.ijs.si/et/talks/cojas 7/Ikaho.ppt Word Sketch

Sketch Engine 1. 2. / ( ) 3. 4. 5. Word Sketch 6. (!!) Sketch Engine 1/5 Sketch Engine 2/5 Word Sketch [ pronoun ]* * pronoun () / ( ) 5%25%() => ( ChaSen ) Coord(ination)

Sketch Engine 3/5 Sketch Engine 4, 5/5 + < + <<?* + + <?+ <<??+ NLP 9/ (V) (X),,,, {,},,, Th (e.g.,off, away, up)

X / V Word Sketch [noun ] [pronoun ]* ( 10 50) V X (V, X) Metaphoric = {1, 0.5, 0}: Th = {1, 0}: X <> Loc = {1, 0}: X < > freq, salience Sketch Engine URL : http://clsl.hi.h.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~kkuroda/ data/object-typology-of-cleaningverbs.xls ( ) A. / B.? C. Th? D. (e.g, off) (e.g,,, ) E. Loc/Th?

A B A. / : Salience = (Mutual Information * Log Frequency) Word Sketch X : X {,,,,,...}, {,,,,...} X {, } : X {, } {,,,,, }; {, } Loc Th + X N M = Metaphoric 1 0 X / N M (e.g.,?*) < > V1 V2 < > V M 0.793 + Yes 0.733 + Yes 0.483 + Yes 0.224 + Yes 0.272* + Yes* 0.022 + No 0.02 + No? 0 Yes 0 Yes C D Loc Th + X N Loc = Loc + 0 X / N Th = Th + 0 X / N, Th Loc Loc Th M 1 0 0.793 No 0 1 0.733 Yes 0.501 0.649 0.508 Yes 1 0 0.25* No? 0.221 0.826 0.221 Yes 0.978 0.022 0.022 Yes 0.96 0.04 0.02 Yes 0.833 0.167 0 Yes 0.783 0.217 0 Yes - - - - -, + 0 0 0* + +, + + 0 + + 0 + 0 + + +, 0 + + +, 0 0 + 0 + + 0 0 + + + + (e.g., ) {+, },, off away up Loc vs Th

VX Satellite-frame L (Talmy 75, 76, 85, 03) Verb-frame L SfL ( ) SfL+ V-fL + ( ) SfL VfL (Matsumoto 03) V (e.g., ) X <th(ing to be removed)> <th loc(ation)> (1) (<loc: > ) <th:> (2) <loc: > [cf. *<loc: > <th:> ] (3) a. (<loc: > { ; }) <th:>; b. *<loc: > (4) a. (<loc: >{ ; })<th:>; b. #<loc: > : th Theme (e.g., (1), (3a), (4a)) A OVERALL STRUCTURE R1 A! S: simplification through profiling P: presupposition R1: CLEAN(A, C) A A! E C R2 C! S R1 R3 B B! S R3: DETACH-FROM(B, C) B B! R3 C C! B is theme; C is source P S P C C! C is primary affectum (thing or location); A is agent R2: REMOVE(A, B) A A! R2 B B! B is primary affectum (thing only); A is agent Alternate E. Loc/Th? : X X Loc Th X X <> : X X Loc Th : X X Loc X <> (product)? X R1 C R2 B R1 primary/foreground X = C R2 primary/foreground X = B X (B C ) primary affectum? R3: A clean B primary

<> X Th Loc F1:!<A remove C from B> F2:!<A clean B (of C> (is-a <A improve B>) F3:!<C detach-from B> (implied <C disappear-from B>) {F1, F2, F3} F1 F2 primary Loc/Th F1 C F2 B F3 Theme Loc (= Theme Source) X C=Th B=Loc Affectum Intended Result Product 1. R (e.g., ) P = {p1, p2,...} 2. P ( I!!) G(P) = {g1, g2,...} I 3. G () (e.g, ) (e.g., )

References [1] () () Daelemans, W. and van den Bosch, A. (2005). Memory-Based Language Processing. Cambridge University Press. Kilgarriff, A. and D. Tugwell (2001). WORD SKETCH: Extraction and Display of Significant Collocations for Lexicography. Information Technology Research Institute Technical Report ITRI-01-12. Matsumoto, Y. (2003). Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In S. Chiba, et al. (eds.), Empirical and Theoretical Investigations into Language: A Festschrift for Masaru Kajita, (pp. 403-418), Tokyo: Kaitakusha. Newmeyer, F. J. (2003). Grammar is Grammar and Usage is Usage. Language 79 (4): 682-707. References [2] References [3] Srdanovic Erjavec, I and Erjavec, T. and Kilgarrif, A. (2008). A web corpus and word sketches for Japanese. J. of Natural Language Processing 15/2. Sutton, R. S. and Barto, A. (1998). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Talmy, L. (1975). Semantics and the syntax of motion. In J. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 4 (pp. 181-238), Academic Press. Talmy, L. (1976). Semantic causative types. In M. Shibitani (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions. Academic Press, N.Y., pp. 43-116. Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon (pp. 57-149), Academic Press. Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization. BLS 17, 480-519. Smith, L. B. (2008).. 25. (2008).. 25. -, I (2008). Sketch Engine. 24: 59-80.