Design Management with Structural Analysis of the Product Systems Fig. 1: Interrelated Complexities among Multiple Domains in Product Design [1] Fig.

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "Design Management with Structural Analysis of the Product Systems Fig. 1: Interrelated Complexities among Multiple Domains in Product Design [1] Fig."

ゆみかかくはり
5 years ago
Views:

/Review 1 1 2 Design Management with Structural Analysis of the Product Systems Kazuhiro AOYAMA 1, Kazuya OIZUMI 1, and Tsuyoshi KOGA 2 Abstract As complexity of products increased, management of

1 /Review Design Management with Structural Analysis of the Product Systems Kazuhiro AOYAMA 1, Kazuya OIZUMI 1, and Tsuyoshi KOGA 2 Abstract As complexity of products increased, management of development project becomes difficult. For better management of product development projects, this paper proposes an integrated model of product, process and organization. The proposed model can be described as MDM (Multiple Domain Matrix). Computational methods to utilize acquired model is discussed in three illustrative examples; design process structuring, organization design and product family structuring. The proposed methods extend techniques on DSM (Design Structure Matrix) and DMM (Domain Mapping Matrix) to deliberate candidate structures of design process, organization and product family. Applied examples show that the proposed project model, which incorporates product, process and organization, provides project managers with arena to discuss various aspects of projects. Keywords product model, design process model, organizational structure model, process management, organization management, multiple domain matrix The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 2 Yamaguchi University, Tokiwadai, Ube, Yamaguchi Received: 27 January 2016, Revised: 12 February 2016, Accepted: 15 February [1]

Design Management with Structural Analysis of the Product Systems Fig. 1: Interrelated Complexities among Multiple Domains in Product Design [1] Fig.

2 Design Management with Structural Analysis of the Product Systems Fig. 1: Interrelated Complexities among Multiple Domains in Product Design [1] Fig. 1 Lindemann Complexity Management [2] [3] - [4] - [5] 3. SysML System Modeling Language 3.1 Multiple Domain Matrix MDM [6] Fig. 2 MDM MDM Oukan Vol.10, No.1 23

AOYAMA, K., OIZUMI, K., and KOGA, T. 3.2.2 Fig.

3 AOYAMA, K., OIZUMI, K., and KOGA, T Fig. 2: Composition of MDM [1] Domain Mapping Matrix DMM [7] Design Structure Matrix DSM [8] MDM Engineering Systems Multiple Domain Matrix [9] MDM Eckert Clarkson DSM [10][11] Lindemann MDM [1] Eppinger DSM [12] Alison partitioning coordination [13] 3.2 Fig. 3 MDM MDM MDM MDM

4 Design Management with Structural Analysis of the Product Systems Fig. 3: Network and MDM of Product Information Fig. 4: Design Process Planning Method Based on Determination of Sequences Oukan Vol.10, No.1 25

5 AOYAMA, K., OIZUMI, K., and KOGA, T. 4. [3][14] 4.1 DSM 4.2 Fig. 4 Fig. 4 Step 1 Fig. 4 Step 2 ISM Interpretive Structural Modeling method Fig. 4 Step 3 Fig. 4 Step LSI LSI LSI Fig. 5 (A) LSI DSM Fig.5 (A) DSM Fig.5 (A) DSM MDM Fig.5 (B) Fig.5 (B) Fig.5 (C)

Design Management with Structural Analysis of the Product Systems Fig. 5: Generating Design Process through Structural Analysis MDM DSM Fig.5 (C) Fig.

6 Design Management with Structural Analysis of the Product Systems Fig. 5: Generating Design Process through Structural Analysis MDM DSM Fig.5 (C) Fig.5 (C) LSI Good Result LSI [15] DRAM Logic Chip DRAM Logic Chip Logic Chip DRAM Chip 4.4 LSI SoC System-On-a-Chip SiP System-In-Package Oukan Vol.10, No.1 27

7 AOYAMA, K., OIZUMI, K., and KOGA, T. Fig. 6: Iteration to Find Good Problem incorporating DSM [16] Fig. 6 [16] Step 1: Step 2: Step 3: Step 4: Step3 5. [17][18][19][20][21] 5.1 MDM Multiple Domain Matrix MDM DMM DSM Quality Function Deployment - QFD DMM QFD QFD Fig. 7(A)(B) Fig. 3 QFD

8 Design Management with Structural Analysis of the Product Systems Fig. 7: DMMs of Design Process and Design Organization 5.2 Fig. 7 (C)(D) 1 2 Oukan Vol.10, No.1 29

9 AOYAMA, K., OIZUMI, K., and KOGA, T. 5.4 Fig. 8: Relationships between Design Parameters, Capabilities, Design Task and Design Resource Fig. 9: Extracting Design Tasks and Design Process 5.3 Fig. 8 Fig DSM Partitioning 5.5 Fig

10 Design Management with Structural Analysis of the Product Systems Fig. 10: Calculating Understanding between Tasks by Proficiency 5.6 Fig. 11 DSM Design Task Implementing Management Difficulty DSM Fig.11(A) rsc5 Fig.11(B) [22] 6.2 A) B) A) QFD Quality Function Deployment Fig. 12 Oukan Vol.10, No.1 31

11 AOYAMA, K., OIZUMI, K., and KOGA, T. Fig. 11: Change of Management Difficulties by Task Allocation Fig

12 Design Management with Structural Analysis of the Product Systems Fig. 12: Information Model for Product Family Design and Resource Management Fig. 13 (A) Fig. 13 (A) 17,450 Fig. 13 (B) Fig. 13 (C) Plan I Plan II Fig. 14 Structure Type 1-3 Oukan Vol.10, No.1 33

13 AOYAMA, K., OIZUMI, K., and KOGA, T. (A) Definition Problem: Solar Boat (B) Calculated Product Family Plans Fig. 13: Example of Product Family Design (Solar Boat) I { } Unit 1 II { } Unit

Design Management with Structural Analysis of the Product Systems (C) Checking Total Coordination and Demand Compromise Fig. 13: Example of Product Family Design (Solar Boat) 1 7. [1] Lindemann, U.

14 Design Management with Structural Analysis of the Product Systems (C) Checking Total Coordination and Demand Compromise Fig. 13: Example of Product Family Design (Solar Boat) 1 7. [1] Lindemann, U., Maurer, M. and Braun, T., Structural Complexity Management, An Approach for the Field of Product Design, Springer, [2] Maurer, M. and Lindemann, U., Facing Multi-Domain Complexity in Product Development, CiDaD Working Paper Series, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1-12, [3] Akihiro Hirao, Tsuyoshi Koga, and Kazuhiro Aoyama, Planning Support of Initial Design Process Based on Clustering and Ordering of Tasks Design Example of an Integrated Circuit, Proceedings of the 12th International Design Structure Matrix Conference, pp , Cambridge, UK, Oukan Vol.10, No.1 35

AOYAMA, K., OIZUMI, K., and KOGA, T. Fig. 14: Organizational Structure Design in View of Product Family [4],, 21 2011. [5] 23 2013. [6] Danilovic, M. and Börjesson, H.

15 AOYAMA, K., OIZUMI, K., and KOGA, T. Fig. 14: Organizational Structure Design in View of Product Family [4],, [5] [6] Danilovic, M. and Börjesson, H., MANAGING THE MUL- TIPROJECT ENVIRONMENT, In The Third Dependence Structure Matrix (DSM) International Workshop, Boston, [7] Steward, D. V., The design structure system - A method for managing the design of complex systems, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-28, pp [8] Bartolomei, J. E., Hastings, D. E., de Neufville, R. and Rhodes, D. H., Engineering Systems Multiple-Domain Matrix: An organizing framework for modeling large-scale complex systems, Systems Engineering, Vol. 15, Issue 1, pp , [9] Eckert, C. M., Keller, R., Earl, C. and Clarkson, P. J. Supporting change processes in design: Complexity, prediction and reliability. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 91, pp , [10] Clarkson, P. J., Simons, C. and Eckert, C., Predicting Change Propagation in Complex Design, ASME 2001 Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Pennsylvania, [11] Eppinger, S. D., Whitney, D. E., Smith, R. P. and Gebala, D. A., A Model-Based Method for Organizing Tasks in Product Development, Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 6, pp. 1-13, [12] Alison, J. T. and Papalambros, P. Y., Optimal Partitioning and Coordination Decisions in System Design Using an Evolutionary Algorithm, 7th World Congress on Structural Multidisciplinary Optimization, Seoul, [13] Honathan R.A. Maier, Georges M. Fadel, Strategic Decisions in the Early Stage of Product Family Design, Proc. Of the ASME DETC/CIE, DFM-21200, PA, USA, [14] Akihiro Hirao, Kazuya Oizumi and Kazuhiro Aoyama, Finding parameter constraint networks in a product system, Proceedings of the 14th International DSM Conference Kyoto, Japan, ISBN: , [15], SDSI-Cubic LSI,, pp. 17-7, , [16],,,,, 20, [17] Oizumi, K., Kitajima, K., Yoshie, N., Koga, T. and Aoyama, K., Management of Product Development Projects Through Integrated Modeling of Product and Process Information, International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED11), Copenhagen, [18], 21, USB, [19] Oizumi, K. and Aoyama, K., Product Oriented Organization of People toward Fostering Capabilities in Product Design, International Design Conference - DESIGN 2012, Dubrovnik, [20] Oizumi, K. and Aoyama, K., Coordination of Product Design Process in View of Product and Organizational Structures. ASME 2012 Design Engineering Technical Confer

16 Design Management with Structural Analysis of the Product Systems ences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Chicago/ASME, [21] Vol. 50, No. 3, pp , [22],, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp , , Oukan Vol.10, No.1 37

Tf9-1-07-7168.dvi

Tf9-1-07-7168.dvi /Review 1 1 1 1 2 Innovation Process Technology Hideyasu KARASAWA 1, Katsuro SAGANE 1, Hidenaga KARASAWA 1, Akira KURIYAMA 1, and Minoru KOBAYASHI 2 Abstract We propose a methodology for Innovation Process