IEEJ
|
|
|
- ありおき つちた
- 4 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1
2 DC PUC /kwh 7.86 /kwh 2-1 ( )EIA Interconnection L.L.C 2
3 PJM 6 PJM ,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5, ( )EIA GWh 200, , , , , ,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20, ( )EEIStatistical Yearbook of the Electric Utility Industry PJM LSELoad Serving Entity 3
4 % 1% 29% 33% ( )EEIStatistical Yearbook of the Electric Utility Industry % 0.3% 2.4% 0.9% 61.3% ( )EEIStatistical Yearbook of the Electric Utility Industry kv 35,000 30,000 25,000 20, , ,000 5, ( )EEIStatistical Yearbook of the Electric Utility Industry
5 the Electricity Generation Customer Choice and Competition Act HB 1509 Ridge /3 EGS EDC PECO , Electric Choice Program Electric Generation Supplier 4 Electric Distribution Company 5
6 Price to Compare (1) Price to Compare Shopping Credit 3 /kwh 2-1 6
7 2-1 /kwh Allegheny Power Allegheny Power( ) Dominion People Plus Green Mountain Energy(50 ) 6.10 Green Mountain Energy(100 ) 6.49 Duquesne Light Duquesne Light( ) 4.89 Allegheny Power 7.10 Dominion People Plus 4.74 Dominion People Plus Green Mountain Energy(50 ) 6.10 Green Mountain Energy(100 ) 6.49 New Power Company 6.85 GPU Energy:Met-Ed GPU Energy:Met-Ed( ) Allegheny Power 7.85 Dominion People Plus Green Mountain Energy(50 ) 6.40 Green Mountain Energy(100 ) 7.09 GPU Energy:PENELEC GPU Energy:PENELEC( ) Allegheny Power 7.30 Dominion People Plus Green Mountain Energy(50 ) 6.40 Green Mountain Energy(100 ) 7.09 PECO PECO( ) 5.67 New Power Allegheny Power 7.35 electric AMERICA( Energy Cooperative Association 5.25 Energy Cooperative Association( Green Mountain Energy(50 ) 6.46 Green Mountain Energy(100 ) 7.09 Mark Services(100 ) 7.53 New Power Company 8.15 Penn Power( ) Penn Power Allegheny Power 7.00 Dominion People Plus Green Mountain Energy(50 ) 6.10 Green Mountain Energy(100 ) 6.49 New Power Company 6.40 PPL PPL( ) 4.6 Allegheny Power 7.25 Green Mountain Energy(50 ) 6.03 Green Mountain Energy(100 ) 7.09 UGI Utilities UGI Utilities( ) 500kWh Allegheny Power 7.25 Green Mountain Energy(50 ) 6.40 Green Mountain Energy(100 ) 7.09 Wellsboro Electric Co. Wellsboro Electric Co.( ) 3.90 Citizens Electric Co. Citizens Electric Co. ( ) 3.76 Pike County Light & PowerPike County Light & Power( ) 5.07 ( )Office of Consumer Advocate Scorecard (2) CTC 7
8 PECO12 Allegheny PUC (1) (2) Budget Billing CAPCustomer Assistance Programs LIURPThe Low Income Usage Reduction Program CARESCustomer Assistance Referral and Evaluation Program Hardship Funds LIHEAPLow Income Home Energy Assistsnce Program PUC , , , , , , , , ,944 CAPCARESLIURPHardship Funds 8
9 (3) 3 (4) CDS PECO New Power NPC PECO PUC 25 PUC PUC PECO PECO
10 UNICOM EXELON 16,500MW GPU Energy GPU Energy Sithe Energies GPU First Energy Corp. PUC Duquesne Light Duquesne Light PUC ,035MW 10 FirstEnergy Corp Orion Power Holdings Allegheny Power Allegheny Power Allegheny Energy 300 West Penn Power ,000MW ,000MW PJM WEST PJM FERC 10
11 PECO Duquesne Light18 33 PECO28 Duquesne Light14 PECO 33 Penn Power20 PECO34 Duquesne Light31 PECO Duquesne Light /kwh /kwh , , , , , , , , , ,
12 Allegheny Power 2, , , Duquesne Light 175, , , GPU Energy 35, , , PECO 467, , , , , , , Pennsylvania Power & Light 17, , , , , Allegheny Power Duquesne Light GPU Energy , PECO , Pennsylvania Power & Light
13 GPU CDS PECO 30 CDS PECO 2000 GPU 7 PUC GPU PECO CDS
14 PJM LMP Utility.com UtiliMAXBright Options.comXenergy Inc.FPL Energy Services 5 Sonny Popowsky /MW /MW 2-13 Mid-Atlantic Power Supply Association Suzanne Daycock PJM Power Markets Week 14
15 LMP 2-12 LMP /1/1 00/2/1 00/3/1 00/4/1 00/5/1 00/6/1 00/7/1 00/8/1 00/9/1 00/10/1 00/11/1 00/12/1 01/1/1 01/2/1 01/3/1 01/4/1 01/5/1 /MWh /6/1 00/7/1 00/8/1 00/9/1 00/10/1 00/11/1 00/12/1 01/1/1 01/2/1 01/3/1 01/4/1 01/5/1 /MWh /1/1 1999/3/1 1999/5/1 1999/7/1 1999/9/1 1999/11/1 2000/1/1 2000/3/1 2000/5/1 2000/7/1 2000/9/1 2000/11/1 2001/1/1 2001/3/1 2001/5/1
16 2.7. PJM 16
17 ,653, ,037MW 1.84 MWh 6.85 /kwh 6.66 /kwh 1 /kwh bundled retail service integrated utility service FPSC FPSC FPSC interchange market 1 1 FERC 30 Florida Power & LightFPL Florida Power Corp FPCTampa Electric Co.TECOGulf Power Co.GPC Jacksonville Electric AuthorityJEA FP&L
18 3-1 EIA FP&L FPC TECO Tampa JEA Jacksonville GPC 3-2 EIA 18
19 % 3-1 Florida PSC Statistics of the Florida Electric Utility Industry
20 3-3 5 Florida PSC Statistics of the Florida Electric Utility Industry Florida PSC Statistics of the Florida Electric Utility Industry
21 3-5 Florida PSC Statistics of the Florida Electric Utility Industry FP&L JEA GPC : kwh ,000 1,500 FP&L FPC TECO GPC JEA Florida PSC Comparative Rate Statistics KW ,000 2,000 kwh 750 1,500 15,000 45, , , ,000 FP&L ,157 2,954 9,575 22,757 45,362 FPC ,012 2,727 9,062 22,880 45,748 TECO ,229 3,058 10,096 24,541 48,827 GPC ,278 8,397 19,157 38,087 JEA ,016 2,51 8,385 20,450 40,700 Florida PSC Comparative Rate Statistics FPSC JEA
22 Capacity Cost Recovery 3-4 1,000kWh TECO $43.26 $49.05 $51.92 $42.20 $36.67 $28.85 $28.30 $18.42 $1.81 $2.09 $1.14 $0.53 $0.08 N/A $1.65 $0.96 $5.27 $11.08 $2.56 $2.08 $0.89 $2.34 $2.19 $0.66 $87.98 $93.41 $87.76 $ (1) FPSC 1 10 FPSC FPSC FPSC Florida Electrical Power Plants Siting and Transmission Line Siting Acts FPSC Grid Bill (2) kV 138kV 2 400MW 1970 Southern Company SC FPSC 500kV 22
23 3,600MW SC coal-by-wire SC FPSC 1978 FEB 1 FEB FEB 20% 1995 EWG 7.5 FEB (3) FERC FPSC 1997 OASIS FERC RTO FERC FPSC 1999 RTO ITA RTS ITA ISO EPACT 1935 PUHCA Exempt 23
24 FP&L FPC 1 2 FPSC FERC 3-5 TECO FRCC ITA 7 IPP FPSC FP&L FRCC FPC RTS FPSC JEA 1 FPSC States Electric Restructuring Activities Update 2000 transco FP&L FPCTECO RTO GridFlorida FERC GridFlorida GridFlorida non-voting ownership interest GridFlorida FERC FPSC FPSC FERC GridFlorida NERC FRCC RTO Gridco ISO Transco Hybrid 24
25 ISO GridFlorida FPSC GridFlorida FERC FERC FP&LFPCTECO GridFlorida GridFlorida Southern Company GridFlorida JEA FERC GridSouth (1) 3-6 FPSC
26 FPSC PSC (2) FPSC FPSC settlement agreement FPSC FP&L / FPSC 2001 (3) FPSC FPSC (4)
27 FPSC FPSC SB SB FPSC PSC 3 FPSC FP&L / FPSC GPC 3 1, FPSC Duke Energy New Smyrna TECO 1, FPSC GPC 1, FPSC Duke Energy New Smyrna SB FPSC TECO , FPSC FP&L FPC TECO FPSC FP&L FPC FP&L 3 10 FPC FPSC MFRs 27
28
29 4. FERC FERC FERC 20 PJM PJM 10 29
北東アジア石油市場自由化の進展とその影響に関する調査¨
1 7 31 11 15 PPS 19 10 4 16 2 2-1 1990 1990 1991 EU EU 1996 EU 2003 900 kwh 1998 2000 EU 2003 EU 2007 EU 2001 FERC FERC FERC 1996 888889 ISO Independent System Operator 1999 2000 RTORegional Transmission
（独）国際協力機構 御中
2. 2.1. PJMERCOT EU EUNord Pool 2.1.1. (1) 1995 1999 2003 3 1995 4 1997 7 20kV 2,000kW 1999 5 3 2,000kW 7,000V 4 1 3 1 0.4 2-1 2001 11 2003 2005 4 4 2005 4 2.1.1-1 2.1.1-1 2005 4 1 2003 2007 2-2 2.1.1-2
5 0
5 0 2003 14 4 6,180 KW 5,100 ( ) utilities Utilities utilities utilities AEP 11 FERC utilities ( ) utilities utility 6 9 9 12 14 17 17 9 12 17 timeline 18 ( ) ( ) ( ) 26 26 27 ( ) ( ) 29 ( ) ( ) ( ) AEP
NOPR 1978 IPPIndependent Power Producer NOPR IPP PUCPublic Utility Commissions FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commiss
1978 12 IPP ISO 1996 RTO 34 1978 1988 NOPR 1978 IPPIndependent Power Producer 1988 1978 1988 NOPR IPP 1990 10 PUCPublic Utility Commissions FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 2001 1970 5 1 1978
海外における電力自由化動向
PJM Nord Pool 1. 13 2 26 3 9 4 19 1 PJM Nord Pool PJM PJM Nord Pool NETA PJM 1 13 4 19 1 2. PJM 2.1. PJM-ISO 2 PJM Pennsylvania New Jersey Maryland 3 PJM Delaware Virginia Washington D.C. 5 1 PJM-ISO PJM
【修正版】加州報告書第Ⅱ部 その１.PDF
Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland 1 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 John Quain Load Serving Entity Merchant Plant Load Serving Entity Over The Counter Office of Interconnection Locational Marginal Price) PECO Energy
shuron.dvi
14 2 6 ( ) :, : CO2 1 85 ExternE 2 4 3 1 1 2 3 2.1... 3 2.1.1... 3 2.1.2... 3 2.2... 5 3 6 3.1... 6 3.2... 6 3.2.1... 6 3.2.2... 7 3.2.3... 9 3.2.4... 21 3.3... 25 3.4... 25 4 27 4.1... 27 4.2... 27 4.2.1...
IEEJ: PJM RTO Tradable Obligations System 2
27 27 IEEJ:2007 7 19 6 7 1 IEEJ:2007 7 PJM RTO Tradable Obligations System 2 IEEJ:2007 7 P ES P* P ED P* 3 IEEJ:2007 7 /1,000kWh 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 EEX Powernext Omel Pool GME APX Nord Pool Denmark West
2
2 ... 2... 3... 5... 6 1... 7 1-1... 8 1-1-1... 8 1-1-2... 9 1-2... 10 1-3... 11 1-4... 11... 16 2-1PPS... 17 2-1-1PPS... 17 2-1-2... 20 2-2... 23 2-2-1... 23 2-2-2... 25... 29 3-1... 30 3-1-1... 30 3-1-2...
レポート本文電力自由化2000年4月.PDF
No.80 May 2000 2000 3 21 27 1995 31 2000 3 21 IPP 1 3 1 LNG 2 99 5 2000 3 21 31 95 12 95 IPPIndependent Power Producer 2000 2,000kW 2 27% 95 7 95 96 98 3 IPP 566 kw 2,583 kw 566 kw 104 W 670 kw 99 5 10
2004
IEEJ: 2005 11 * ** *** 2003 6 2004 7 2007 7 1995 2 2 1980 1996 25,000 2 57,250m 3 British Gas 1988 Monopolies and Mergers CommissionMMC1991 Office of Fair TradingOFT 1992 2,500 (5,725m 3 ) British Gas
【特集・ニュース】 ◇キーワード
KDDIR&A 20129 PG&E ARRAM2M PAGE 1 of 21 Title Author Abstract Keyword Smart Grid status in the U.S. KAIFU, Michi CEO of ENOTECH Consulting In the U.S., the power utility system is fragmented and complex,
電力市場設計の経済学：メモ
2002 9 24 - (p.11, Chapter 1-1, Stoft (2002)) - (p.12, Chapter 1-1, Stoft (2002)) 2000 2 (1) IT (2) - 50 60 50 100 real power flow reactive power flow 1 Stoft (2002), Figure 5-1.2. 90 voltage collapse
2スイ電本文.PDF
15 2003/, No.443 Energy consumption in 2000 Oil products 59.7% Electricity 22.0% Gas 11.1% Wood 2.3% Heat supply 1.6% Industrial waste 1.9% Coal 0.7% 16 Electricity consumption by sector in 2000 Industry
W (JEPX 2 3 JEPX JEPX
Anlysis on Genertor Compny Behviors in Electricity Mret using Multi-Agent Model 970 2005 50W 2000 2005 (JEPX 2 3 JEPX JEPX ............4...5...9... 0...0...2...2...4...4...4...5...7...8... 2...2...22...22...23...23...27...32...32...35...37...
新潟県地域新エネルギー重点ビジョン報告書
232 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 1 1,000[kW] 100[kW] 4 100[kW] 2 () 3 100[kW] 4 () () 5 6 46 7 - 7.8[kWh] 15or20[kWh] 8 9 16 (8) 24 (12) 21 (11) 32 (16) 98.7 176 29 RPS 116 41 44 (22) 5 30 (15) 14 (7) 10
研究レポート表紙.PDF
No.109 June2001 takeishi@fri.fujitsu.co.jp 1 2000 3 2 1 2003 10 3 2003 2003 2007 2003 6,000 1 III. IV. V. 2003 2000 3 2001 3 1 2000 8 2 4.1 5 21 2001 3 814 2001 4 2003 2000 100 3 10 2001 3 19 10 1 I 1
_Yoh_Yasuda
+ + n n n n n n n n + 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% [% of TWh] (data source) IEA Electricity Information 2016 + IE DK Phase 4 ID BR CL IN ZA MX NZ AU CA AT NL SE BE IT UK GR DE ES PT Phase 3 Phase 2 Phase
(2) IPP Independent Power Producers IPP 1995 NCC(New Common Carrier NCC NTT NTT NCC NTT NTT IPP 2. IPP 2.1 1995 4 (3) [1] [2] IPP [2] IPP IPP [1] [2]
![(2) IPP Independent Power Producers IPP 1995 NCC(New Common Carrier NCC NTT NTT NCC NTT NTT IPP 2. IPP 2.1 1995 4 (3) [1] [2] IPP [2] IPP IPP [1] [2]](/thumbs/42/23010176.jpg "(2) IPP Independent Power Producers IPP 1995 NCC(New Common Carrier NCC NTT NTT NCC NTT NTT IPP 2. IPP 2.1 1995 4 (3) [1] [2] IPP [2] IPP IPP [1] [2]")
/ 1995 Grid Access Model 1. (1) 22 1998 12 11 2000-1- (2) IPP Independent Power Producers IPP 1995 NCC(New Common Carrier NCC NTT NTT NCC NTT NTT IPP 2. IPP 2.1 1995 4 (3) [1] [2] IPP [2] IPP IPP [1] [2]
untitled
10 100 CO 2 0.392kg-CO 2 /kwh 5% CO 2 0.555 kg-co 2 /kwh 0.392 kg-co 2 /kwh 5 5 1000kW 1000kWh kwh 15 10 CO 2 CO 2 CO 2 19 197 197 202 640kWh 1,400kWh 880kWh 640W 6,400 1,400kW 14,000 880kW 8,800
円借款案件・事後評価報告書1999（全文・上巻）
8 1999 3 199812 () 19919 19919 19981 7,854 5,335 3.0% 257 239 (1) (B) (2) 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 JP US$ 134.71 126.65 111.20 102.21 94.06 BUS$ 025.47 025.39 025.35 025.00 025.14 CPI 105.7 110.0 113.7
untitled
L A Energy Giant Energy Giant 12 2 2001 MMF World Energy Giant the Largest Energy Trading Company Fortune (2002 1 ) DC LA 1 2001 () 1985 Houston Natural Gas Inter North 1980 90 99 1998 2000 3 313 1008
スプレッド・オプション評価公式を用いた裁定取引の可能性―電力市場のケース― 藤原 浩一,新関 三希代
403 81 1 Black and Scholes 1973 Email:kfujiwar@mail.doshisha.ac.jp 82 404 58 3 1 2 Deng, Johnson and Sogomonian 1999 Margrabe 1978 2 Deng, Johnson and Sogomonian 1999 Margrabe 1978 Black and Scholes 1973
第２９回日中石炭関係総合会議
1 2 3 4 5 6 闞 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 闞 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69
北米東部大停電調査中間報告書（案）
...1...3...5...5...5...6...12...14...14...14...14...15...16...16...17...20...20...20...20...23...23...23...24...25...26...28...29...29...29...29...30...31...31...31...32...33...33...34...35...37...37...37
北東アジア石油市場自由化の進展とその影響に関する調査¨
電力自由化と信頼度維持 - 制度移行期における日米の取り組み - * IPP PPS 2003 NERC(National Electric Reliability Council: ) 1 1-1 3 IPP PPS * ( ) 1 1-1 20 1990 1-1 アメリカ 設備投資 ( 実質 ) と最大需用電力の推移 mil. $ MW 20,000 1,000,000 18,000 900,000
橡ＰＮＧ.PDF
1.1 (PNG) 500 1998 (GDP) 7,700 kina( ) GDP 1,850 kina (686 US ) Area Capital City Population Currency Exchange Rate Life Expectancy at Birth Total Fertility Rate Literacy Rate Languages Religion GDP at
untitled
() 5 8 80% 17 2 366 3,300 () CO2 17 10 1000kWh =0.257KL 1000 =1.16KL 80% 40% 30% 20% 278,000kWh ON 26 22 ON 2 1 1 1 4-2 OFF ON 2 1 1 kw \ \ 1 1 ( 1 1 ( 40) 2 10 ()10 ) 1 (100V) (200V) kwh kwh 1kWh 1kWh
CO CO
... 1 1... 2 1-1 CO 2... 2 1-1-1 CO 2... 2 1-1-2... 3 1-1-3... 4 1-2... 6 1-3... 7 1-3-1... 7 1-3-2... 8 1-3-3... 9 1-4... 11 1-4-1... 12 1-4-2 13 1-4-3... 13 1-4-4... 14 1-4-5... 15 2... 16 3... 17 3-1...
北東アジア石油市場自由化の進展とその影響に関する調査¨
2 23 21 * * 23 23 25 3 8,5 kw 23 5 kw 5 7, kw 25 8,2 kw 23 1 9, kw2 2, kw 25 7 kw 23 5, kw5,3 kw 3 kw 3,2 kw4, kw 23 1 1,4 kw1 8,3 kw 1 9 kw1 3,6 kw 23 24 6.7 tu( 23 8.7 tu1. tu 24 4 tu 23 6.5 tu8.7tu
平成18年3月期 第1四半期財務・業績の概況
1 17630 16 341752 16 1 17630 17331 16630 17630 17331 16630 2,479,568 2,498,800 19,231 2,556,709 1,522,201 1,506,047 16,153 1,629,884 1,875,510 1,903,828 28,318 1,986,491 795,000 814,800 19,800 854,800
住友商事株式会社
At a Glance Step Up PlanAA Plan3 AG Plan 12.7% 140 04 79 03 71 02 61 01 0 50 100 150 18.7% 04 03 02 01 67 112 148 206 0 50 100 150 200 250 6.9% 04 03 02 01 46 46 51 76 0 20 40 60 80 8.5% 94 04 78 03 6
橡★★17小嶌正稔.PDF
Esso cross-marketing Shell Esso Regent Texaco Caltex Mobil Total Continental Oil Jet AgipMurphy Corp Gulf Tide Water Ultramar Phillips Institute of Petroleum, Petroleum Review Retail Marketing Survey Facts
untitled
2007 9 2 ( ) ( ) 1 40 6 40 6 1 2005 2007 4 2005 58 2005 56 2006 57 2007 58 3 2000 ( ) ( ) 2007 (The Fidelity Research Institute Retirement Index sm ) 1 6 19 2 26 2 2 58% Generation X 25 42 54% Baby Boomer(43
Asia International Grid Connection SG - Interim Report
Asia International Grid Connection SG - Interim Report The State of the Interconnectors in Europe Since 1910s 1915 Denmark-Sweden Interconnection 1920 Interconnection between France, Switzerland and Italia.
untitled
Tohoku Electric Power Co., Inc. CSR Report 2012 01 Tohoku Electric Power Co., Inc. CSR Report 2012 01 03 05 07 08 09 11 12 13 38 39 41 43 44 45 15 17 18 19 22 29 31 33 34 35 36 37 47 49 52 53 54 55 02
1 9 10 10 21 25 28 38 38 41 45 48 56 57 77 77 77 78 96 97 98 102 105 114 116 117 117 118 118 118 121 122 124 1 2 3 5 11 18 kwh 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985
和文報告書目次案
No. 2 15 9 JR 03 100 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 ... 1... 1 1.2... 1 1.2.1... 1 1.2.2... 1 1.2.3... 2 1.3... 2 2... 5 2.1 I... 5 2.1.1... 5 2.1.2... 6 2.1.3... 10 2.1.4... 14 2.1.5... 17 2.1.6... 17 2.1.7... 18
通_､_Y業_ﾈ_糟1エネルギ_[庁殿
1. 1 2. 3 2.1 3 2.2 DSM 4 2.3 4 2.4 6 3. 8 3.1 8 3.1.1 8 3.1.2 9 3.1.3 12 3.1.4 5 10 13 3.1.5 13 3.2 16 3.2.1 16 (1) 16 (2) 16 (3) 5 10 19 3.2.2 21 (1 21 (2 21 (3 23 3.2.3 24 (1 24 (2 25 (35 10 ) 26 3.2.4
untitled
NEDO 2001 17 (640 kl) 2006 49 (1,850 kl) 5 3 2012 75 (2,840 kl)eia Energy Information Administration 112 (4,240 kl) 1 1 EIA 1MTBE 2 3 Twenty in Ten 4 5EIA 2 6 1 EIA: Annual Energy Outlook 2007 16 F.O.Licht
1_Covers
1 ECFA 17 1991 GDP 2001 13.5 2003 9.2 2004 9.4 120 18 2 s 1 1.1 1 1.2 2 1.3 3 1.4 3 2.1 6 2.2 6 2.3 8 2.4 10 2.5 11 3.1 13 3.2 17 3.3 21 4.1 26 4.2 26 4.3 APK 27 5.1 TETS 1 31 5.2 TETS 2 33 5.3 TETS 3
untitled
CA 04 1,360 100.8 0.1 83 34,176 7.61 0.40 51,532 1.3 322,736 5.9 05 1,369 100.0 0.8 80 57,269 7.86 0.43 55,001 6.7 311,107 3.6 06 1,370 99.8 0.2 83 48,250 7.73 0.46 56,369 2.5 319,129 2.6 06/ 1-3 99.4
,
JOC , , HP http://www.nta.go.jp pp. 426455 NPO pp. 766810 , Internal Revenue Service 2012 Publication 547, Casualties, Disasters, and Thefts 2012 Returns, pp. www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p.pdf2013. 3. 20
トピックス 当工業会の事業報告並びに事業計画について 平成 28 年度事業報告書 EU IATA 6.3% 5% % MRJ 9 12 FAA 5 EASA 21% 777X 2019 PW1400G-JM 5 FAA GE9X
当工業会の事業報告並びに事業計画について 平成 28 年度事業報告書 28 4 1 29 3 31 EU IATA 6.3% 5% 28 7.8% 1.68 28 MRJ 9 12 FAA 5 EASA 21% 777X 2019 PW1400G-JM 5 FAAGE9X 2018 8 F-35A 9 4 X-2 3 C-2P-1 US-2 12 H- B 6 H- A 32 2 1 33 5 3
I
GDP 2002 3.8 2003 4.8 1990 GPOGroup Purchasing Organization 2003 800 GPO 70 190 GPO GPO POS 2001 9 11 2002 3.8 2003 4.8 15.5 2002 2003 10.5 3.8 11.0 4.8 1.6 9.3 1.7 6.3 14.9 15.5 2001 2003 2004 8 8 2
目次 Ⅰ. テキサスの電力事情 1. テキサス州の概要 2. エネルギ- 関係者 3. エネルギ- 政策 : 完全自由化 4. 電力市場 :Energy-Only-Market 5. 予備力対策 ( アデカシー ) 6. 再エネ政策 : 風力 7. 再エネ (DER) 政策 : 太陽光 8.ERCO
1 テキサスの電力事情 2FERC のストレージ オーダー 第 85 回京大再エネ講座研究会説明資料 2018 年 4 月 10 日京大再エネ講座特任教授山家公雄 目次 Ⅰ. テキサスの電力事情 1. テキサス州の概要 2. エネルギ- 関係者 3. エネルギ- 政策 : 完全自由化 4. 電力市場 :Energy-Only-Market 5. 予備力対策 ( アデカシー ) 6. 再エネ政策 :
1.5 IPCC A Coal Phase-Out Pathway for 1.5 C
1.5 IPCC1.5 2018 2050 A Coal Phase-Out Pathway for 1.5 C Coalswarm Global Coal Plant TrackerGlobal Fossil Projects Tracker; CoalWire newsletter FrackSwarm Greenpeace International NGO NGO The Global Coal
需 要 家 保 護 策 の 必 要 性 138 電 気 は 生 活 に 必 要 不 可 欠 な ユニバーサルサービス であり 既 に 自 由 化 を 実 施 した 諸 外 国 の 多 くは 自 由 化 に 伴 い 諸 般 の 事 情 によりサービスが 受 けられなくなってしまった 需 要 家 に 対
諸 外 国 における 需 要 家 保 護 策 137 需 要 家 保 護 策 の 必 要 性 138 電 気 は 生 活 に 必 要 不 可 欠 な ユニバーサルサービス であり 既 に 自 由 化 を 実 施 した 諸 外 国 の 多 くは 自 由 化 に 伴 い 諸 般 の 事 情 によりサービスが 受 けられなくなってしまった 需 要 家 に 対 して 何 らかの 保 護 策 を 講 じている
野村資本市場研究所｜「財政の崖」回避をめぐる議論と米国地方債市場（PDF）
1. 1 2011 28% 2. 2012 12 3. 2013 1 2 4. 1 1 2013 1 2 2 1 2 Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, Regulatory Fiscal cliff negotiation could affect the taxexemption, December 10 2012. Bloomberg,
大垣尚司 １８９‐２１４／１８９‐２１４
GSE GSE (government sponsored entities) GSE RMBS GSE GSE GSE CRT GSE GNMA (Government National Mortgage Association) Fannie Mae Freddie MacGSE [government sponsored entities] (Federal Home Finance Agency,
Regular Midgrade Premium Total Conventional 451 43 68 562 66.6% 56.6% 58.1% 64.6% Oxygenated 22 4 2 28 3.2% 5.3% 1.7% 3.2% Reformulated 204 29 47 280
1 RONMON Regular Midgrade Premium Total Conventional 451 43 68 562 66.6% 56.6% 58.1% 64.6% Oxygenated 22 4 2 28 3.2% 5.3% 1.7% 3.2% Reformulated 204 29 47 280 30.1% 38.2% 40.2% 32.2% Total 677 76 117 870
ISO & ISO の概要
ISO 7637-2 & ISO 7637-3 e 217 3 13 1 1 2 ISO 7637-2 2 2.1.................... 2 2.1.1 LISN (AN).............. 2 2.1.2 S............... 3 2.1.3.. 3 2.2 ECE Regulation No. 1.5.......... 3 3 ISO 7637-2 4
電力営業系ソリューションの電力システム改革への取組み
Approach to Electricity Systems Reform by Electricity Retail Solution 赤堀勝幸 犬塚純 岩切伸一 内田倫大 あらまし Abstract The Expert Committee for Electricity Systems Reform of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry
Strategy& Foresight vol Autumn
Strategy& Foresight vol.5 2015 Autumn vol.5 2015 AUTUMN Strategy& Foresight PwC Strategy& Contents 特集 巻頭言 3 4 9 18 22 Strategy& Foresight Vol.5 2015 Autumn 1 2 Strategy& Foresight Vol.5 2015 Autumn shoji.shiraishi@
損保ジャパンの現状2011
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69
りん酸形燃料電池の現状と今後の展望
The Current Status and the Future Prospects of Phosphoric Acid Fuel Cell Kazuaki KOSHI Key Words: Fuel Cell, Phosphoric acid,, Digester gas, Bio gas, Hydrogen high efficent clean energy saved IPCC 4 20
1.3 a) 44 EC b) NEA c) VECO d) 1.4 / NEA: National Electrification Administration , ,
NEA :2003 7 1. 1.1 1969 NEA: National Electrification Administration NEA 6038 REC: Rural Electrification Cooperative 91 120 EC *1 22,194 *2 1,324 3 EC NPC: National Power Corporation NPC NEA 18% 91 56%
NOV2016 TMG
Text Carlos Barria/Reuters 1990 97 2011 2016 原 化 燃料 電源 然エネルギー 熱電併給 独占 市場 公正な競争市場 閉鎖的 地域独 型 ネットワーク 開放的 広域的 垂直統合 構造 平展開 受け 統 的 市 の役割 活発 多様 < 由化以前 : 発送電 貫 > < 由化以降 > < 発送電分離以降 > 発電 発電 IPP 発電事業 由競 争 法定独占
野村資本市場研究所｜ASEAN投資信託市場の現状と課題（PDF）
213 Spring ASEAN 1. 2. 5.7 ASEAN 3. 3.3 4. 2.4 5. ASEAN 76 1 ASEAN 213 ASEAN 4 ASEAN ASEAN 2 1 1 1 1 1 OECD The Emerging Middle Class in Developing Countries January 21 2 Cerulli Associates Asset Management
4303ALL-“Å‘I
433200610 1. 19952000 2007 PPS: Power Producer and Supplier PPS 2. 2.1 AMA: American Marketing Association 1935 AMA National Association of Marketing Teachers AMA 1948 1960 1935 1985 20041985 22004 2006p.17
77 http//www.pref.nara.jp/rinsei/bio/biotop.htm 1... 1 2... 2 3... 3 4... 4 5 1... 5 6 2... 6 7 3... 7 8 4... 8 9... 9 1... 1 11... 12 12... 14 13... 16 14... 18 15... 2 16... 22 17 1... 24 18 2... 26
: Electricity Regulatory Authority of Vietnam : ERPV
: 79 3 2010 12 Electricity Regulatory Authority of Vietnam : ERPV 1. 1990 1990 19 79 3 2000-2001 2010 2002 2001 6 8 EPIRA : Electric Power Industry Reform Act EPIRA 2003 9 2002 9 4 2002 20 : 2004 12 15
橡平成12年度バイオマス発電等の実態調査（HP版）.PDF
IEEJ 2001 7 IEEJ 2001 7-2 - IEEJ 2001 7-3 - IEEJ 2001 7 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: IPCC EU 2010 EU 12 260 m 3 569 m 3 830 m 3 30 1,400 m 3 12 3 12 13 5 IEEJ 2001 7 1 1.1 30 1 20 29 5 1
アメリカのNPO税制
N P O NPO 501 NPO NPO NPO NPO NPO 17 20 NPO NPO NPO NPO NPO NPO 501 NPO Non-profit Organization 26 U.S.C.501 30 2004. NPO 501 199357 5,6902003964,418 10 59.7 50164.2 2003 501 501 35 130 NPO 25 NPO 1,250
untitled
2005 17 NPO (ISEP) 1 1-1. Disclosure 1-2 EU (GoO) 2. 2-1. Disclosure 2-2 2-3 3 EU 3-1 EU GoO 3-2 3-2-1 3-2-2 3-2-3 3-2-4 3-2-5 3-2-6 3-2-7 3-2-8 3-2-9 3-2-10 3-2-11 3-2-12 3-2-13 3-3 4 5 5-1. 5-2 EU 1990
I
takeishi@fri.fujitsu.com 2004 500kW 2005 50kW 26% 2000 3 2004 4 2005 6 9 74 2005 75 2005 2002 1 2002 7 2005 2002 2008 5 2004 500kW 2005 50kW 26% 2000 3 2004 4 2005 6 9 74 2005 75 2005 9 2000 1 3 2 2003
58“ƒŒ{Ł¶flÅ›º-2
Hiroki Sakamoto People s Power Revolution 1986 EDSA 1 1 NSCB National Statistical Coordination Board 2003 10 1998 2000 35.8 38.4 9 8 7 EDSA The Rich Getting Richer, the Poor Getting Poorer EDSA 92 Winter
CONTENTS 目次 1. 小規模電力系統における再生可能エネルギー導入の課題と対策 Issues and solutions of introducing renewable energy (RE) in the small grid 2.. 小規模系統へのシステム導入事例 System int
日 IRENA( 国際再生可能エネルギー機関 ) 共催セミナー 世界の再生可能エネルギー事業の展望と課題 ~ アジアとアフリカから International Seminar on Market Challenges and Opportunities for Renewable Energy in Asia and Africa 電力貯蔵装置による小規模系統の品質向上対策 Power quality
<4F495341836A8385815B835832308EFC944E8B4C944F8D862E696E6464>
OITA INFORMATION SERVICE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION CONTENTS 2009. 3 47 02 OITA INFORMATION SERVICE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION NEWS 03 OITA INFORMATION SERVICE INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION 04 05 NEWS OITA INFORMATION SERVICE
中田真佐男 ３２３‐３５２／３２３‐３５２
IT FinTech Finance Technology e SNS (AI) (2013) (2015) ATM IC EMV VISA MasterJCB VISA Master (Union Pay) VISA Master JCB J-Debit J-Debit VISA IC Alipay QR POS nanaco WAON EdyJR Suica PASMO au Master au
, General Contractor Engineering News-Record (ENR) The Top 400 Contractors Sourcebook ,
2005 2004 2005 1 1,000 10 General Contractor Engineering News-Record (ENR) 2005 10 The Top 400 Contractors Sourcebook 2005 2004 400 2,097 8.5 164 6.5 1,769 22.4 328 400 69.3 100 1 2004 CM at Risk 2005
3B11.dvi
Siripatanakulkhajorn Sakchai Study on Stochastic Optimal Electric Power Procurement Strategies with Uncertain Market Prices Sakchai Siripatanakulkhajorn,StudentMember,YuichiSaisho, Student Member, Yasumasa
資料１－１ 経済性評価モデルによる地中貯留ポテンシャルの評価
13 26 4 25 RITE IPCC CO2 CO2 CO2 I. CCS IPCC 55ppmv PNNL IIASA DNE21+ 2 25 21 54 77 CCS IPCC SRES B2 4 LNG CO2 CO2 CO2 5,6 GtC 1,5 GtC 1% CO2 1 RITE Akimoto et al., Proc. of GHGT7, 24 CO2 CO 2 (GtC) CO
W W - W. m - km. km..c - mm. km. ,,. m/, -,, -,/m - -. - - W- kw - -. - / / - - - k rated output powerwww WWW kw kw kw kw k m/w W. m kw W m/ W - m m mw. m m kw kw W. m m W W kw kg kw kg kw kg kw, kg k
02 02 03 03 04 06 08 09 10 10 01SK-Electronics CO., LTD.
2012 02 02 03 03 04 06 08 09 10 10 01SK-Electronics CO., LTD. ISO140012002 20052011 5 SK-Electronics CO., LTD.02 03SK-Electronics CO., LTD. P9 10 9 5 12 8 11 6 8 10 3 510 7 11 2 3 510 7 10 11 510 7 12
1 NHK 2007 100 41.9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TV 12 90 60 13 14 TV / 15 / 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 A B B C D A 28 12 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 4,8 100 37 38 39 40 41 NHK 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49
取扱説明書
ED-601 ED-501 ED-401 2 3 4 23 14 5 6 18 10 7 1 2 6 3 4 8 9 16 16 16 12 1 2 18 10 2 1 5 12 11 1 2 1 2 12 1 2 13 16 14 3 2 4 1 1 2 16 3 4 18 15 1 2 16 2 3 1 1 2 3 18 17 18 22 19 D A C 20 A B 22 B C D 22
untitled
EMG 2014/7/8 Rev. 2015/6/20 IEA 2013 2013 1.5 f=df/dt=r*n*(1 F) F=N/K log(f/(1 f)) 1 0.5 0.5 0 1850 1900 1950 2000 2050 2100 2150 1 1.5 2 2.5 year hydrogen BTG or IGCC power wiki IGCC wiki nuclear
GDP tax expenditure GDP GDP GDP TANF GDP
特集 : アメリカの社会保障 21 世紀のアメリカ社会保障 渋谷博史 中浜隆 櫻井潤 1 2 3 1 2 1960 1980 1963 1980 Reaganomics 1960 1990 2000 1 21 1960 1980 4 21 1950 1 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 3 2 2-1 1 2006 1 GDP 8.9 2 tax expenditure GDP 0.7 0.8 4 3
橡19_0_hyoushi.PDF
1 2 3 139 1 2 1970 1985 140 1 1 1 1 1 1970 1985 GDP 1 toe / 100 (1987 ) 1 1 1970 1985 2 2 EDMC 1 1 2 2 1973 77.4 1973 83.1 64% 141 1 2 1 2 1973 4 3 1973 1979 1973 1 1979 2 4 2 3 1973 1979 4 2 142 2 3 1
untitled
BNP 2007 2 82 1400 13.4% 13.6% 3.5% PEL/CEL BNL bc 7.4% 9.4% 21.9% 24.0% 22 8200 20.0% 56% BNL 1 1 2 2006 2 2 EPS 5.22 17.9% ROE 23.6%1.4 2007 7 31 BNP 2007 2 2007 2 BNP 82 1400 13.4% 48 4800 13.1% BNL
- Forward Looking Statement - Certain statements in the following presentation regarding Tokyo Electric Power`s business operations may constitute for
-FY2002 Interim Results Presentation- ( April 1, 2002 September 30, 2002 ) Tokyo Electric Power Company November 20, 2002 - Forward Looking Statement - Certain statements in the following presentation
CFC BEPS CFC BEPS
26 27 KPMG 1... 2 1... 2 2... 3 2... 5 1... 5 1 CFC... 5 2... 11 3 BEPS... 25 2... 28 1 CFC... 28 2... 31 3 BEPS... 36 1 1 1 1 1 53 OECD BEPS 2 1 2 2 1. 2. 3. (a) (b) F (c) (a) (b) (c) BEPS 4. KPMG KPMG
% OFHEO Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight ODPM Office of the Deputy Prime Minister's INSEE (2004 ) PCEOECDE
GDP 7 OFHEO 2005 3 272.89 1980 100 12.0 5 55.3 3 2 1 1979 2004 2 6 2000 68 14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 90 2.75 2005 3.4 8.0% 1 6.0% 4.0% 30.3 2.0% DC 20 0.0% OFHEOHouse Price Index 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Business-Higher Education Forum(BHEF) Nils Haselmo Hank McKinnell CEO Working Together, Creating Knowledge---The University-Industry Research Collabor
No.2 2002 11 Business-Higher Education Forum Business-Higher Education Forum(BHEF) Nils Haselmo Hank McKinnell CEO Working Together, Creating Knowledge---The University-Industry Research Collaboration
主な導入国における経緯・制度について
1 3 6 9 1991 [carbon dioxide tax] 1990 2001 [energy tax] 2000 12 1/2 1995 1 860 SKR/kl 3,640 SKR/kl 1,058 SKR/kl 2,090 SKR/kl 1,058 SKR/kl 2,090 SKR/kl 1,058 SKR/kl 743 SKR/kl 1,120 SKR/t 787 SKR/t LPG
EQUIVALENT TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE FOR ISLANDING DETECTION METHODS OF SYNCHRONOUS GENERATOR -REACTIVE POWER PERTURBATION METHODS USING AVR OR SVC- Ju
EQUIVALENT TRANSFORMATION TECHNIQUE FOR ISLANDING DETECTION METHODS OF SYNCHRONOUS GENERATOR -REACTIVE POWER PERTURBATION METHODS USING AVR OR SVC- Jun Motohashi, Member, Takashi Ichinose, Member (Tokyo
表1
39% 57% 4% 24 648,208 kwh 30% 70% 24 253,252 63% 37% 24 272,371 () () 1 (/) 80,300 (km) 51,000 () 18,000 () 81,416 () 58,800 168.7 136.4 () 138,150 118.1 5 427,666 17 423.2 7,600 143,000 / 10,000 8,000
