42

Similar documents
THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY 2007, Vol. 15 No. 2, 217–227

2 251 Barrera, 1986; Barrera, e.g., Gottlieb, 1985 Wethington & Kessler 1986 r Cohen & Wills,

220 28;29) 30 35) 26;27) % 8.0% 9 36) 8) 14) 37) O O 13 2 E S % % 2 6 1fl 2fl 3fl 3 4

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1991, Vol. 62, No. 3, A study on the reliability and validity of a scale to measure shyness as a trait Atsu

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology



2 Effects of the exposure time of stimulus, the level of anxiety, and the serial position on the attentional bias to the threat-related information SA

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1990, Vol. 61, No. 3, The effects of a recipient's openness and conveyance to a third party of the self-dis


56 56 The Development of Preschool Children s Views About Conflict Resolution With Peers : Diversity of changes from five-year-olds to six-year-olds Y



Yamagata Journal of Health Sciences, Vol. 16, 2013 Tamio KEITOKU 1 2 Katsuko TANNO 3 Kiyoko ARIMA 4 Noboru CHIBA 1 Abstract The present study aimed to


132 Camerer (2003) Chen, Lakshminarayanan and Santos (2006) fmri ventral stiatum Fliessbach K., Weber B., Trautner P., Dohmen T., Sunde U., Elger C. E

評論・社会科学 85号(よこ)(P)/3.佐分

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

02[ ]小山・池田(責)岩.indd


Perspective-Taking Perspective-Taking.... Vol. No.

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 2000, Vol. 71, No. 3, Emotion recognition: Facial components associated with various emotions Ken Gouta and

Weiner, Graham & Chandler, 1982 Weiner, Graham, Stern, & Lawson, 1982 Blaine, Crocker, & Major, ;

人文論究60-2(よこ)(P)☆/2.中島

e.g., Mahoney, Vandell, Simpkins, & Zarrett, Bohnert, Fredricks, & Randall2010 breadth intensitydurationengagement e.g., Mahone

7 2000b 2000b 2000b A Vol 8, No 2,

山大紀要13

The Japanese Journal of Psychology 1984, Vol. 55, No. 3, Effects of self-disclosure on interpersonal attraction Masahiko Nakamura (Department

2001 Received November 28, 2014 Current status and long-term changes of the physique and physical fitness of female university students Shiho Hiraku Y

untitled

The Journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Administration and Policies Vol 7, No 2, pp 19 _ 30, 2004 Survey on Counseling Services Performed by Nursi

Jpn. J. Personality 19(2): (2010)

p.14 p.14 p.17 1 p レッテル貼り文 2015: PC 20 p : PC 4

CMCの社会的ネットワークを介した社会的スキルと孤独感との関連性


untitled

パーソナリティ研究 2005 第14巻 第1号 1–16

日本看護管理学会誌15-2

Web Stamps 96 KJ Stamps Web Vol 8, No 1, 2004

52-2.indb

( ) ATR

Japanese Journal of Applied Psychology

Juntendo Medical Journal

46

行動経済学 第5巻 (2012)

<30355F8E9197BF5F8B76967B8E812E696E6464>

駒田朋子.indd

Kyushu Communication Studies 第2号


Library and Information Science No

越智59.qxd

Japanese Journal of Family Sociology, 29(1): (2017)

(’Ó)”R


Ł×

Ⅱ. 用語の操作的定義 Ⅲ. 対象と方法 1. 対象 WAM NET 2. 調査期間 : 3. 調査方法 4. 調査内容 5. 分析方法 FisherMann-Whitney U Kruskal-Wallis SPSS. for Windows 6. 倫理的配慮 Vol. No.

272 11) 12) 1 Barrera 13) 1fl social embeddedness 2fl perceived support 3fl enacted support 3 14) 15) 3 2fl 13) 16;17) 1 14;15;18 21) 2 22;23) 4 24;25

_Y13™n‹ä

JO52-01

<8ED089EF8B D312D30914F95742E696E6464>

50 Planned Happenstance Parsons Brown Brooks, Gelatt Gelatt 1962 Gelatt, positive uncertainty nonrational Gelatt, 1

Table 1 Means and standard deviations of topic familiarity for the topics used in the study Note. standard deviations are in parenthesis.

66-1 田中健吾・松浦紗織.pwd

国際社会文化研究所紀要 14号☆/目次

, 1996;, , , 1993, 1998, 1989,1992, 1993,1991, 1992, 1993;, 1 991;, 1993;, 1993;, 1994;, 199 5;, 1996;, 1996, 1991;, 1991;, 1994;, 199


e.g. Kubota 2011 Piller & Takahashi 2006 Kubota 2011 Piller & Takahashi 2006 Kubota 2011 Piller et al Heller 2003 Piller, Takahashi & Watanabe


IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2017-SLP-115 No /2/18 1,a) 1 1,2 Sakriani Sakti [1][2] [3][4] [5][6][7] [8] [9] 1 Nara Institute of Scie

日本感性工学会論文誌

ISSN ISBN C3033 The Institute for Economic Studies Seijo University , Seijo, Setagaya Tokyo , Japan

研究論集Vol.16-No.2.indb

8-1.indb

, PDD ASD p.,.,..,..,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,, 146

スポーツ教育学研究(2013. Vol.33, No1, pp.1-13)

Q [4] 2. [3] [5] ϵ- Q Q CO CO [4] Q Q [1] i = X ln n i + C (1) n i i n n i i i n i = n X i i C exploration exploitation [4] Q Q Q ϵ 1 ϵ 3. [3] [5] [4]


1 Web [2] Web [3] [4] [5], [6] [7] [8] S.W. [9] 3. MeetingShelf Web MeetingShelf MeetingShelf (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Web MeetingShelf


<8ED089EF8B D312D30914F95742E696E6464>


社会関係資本と外国人に対する寛容さに関する研究―JGSS-2008 の分析から―

/toushin/.htm GP GP GP GP GP p.

扉日59

untitled


昭和恐慌期における長野県下農業・農村と産業組合の展開過程

16_.....E...._.I.v2006

百人一首かるた選手の競技時の脳の情報処理に関する研究

01_渡部先生_21-2.indd

On Japanese empathy and interpretation IKEDA, Masatoshi In this paper I compared it with empathy as a manner of psychotherapist about interpretation a

1-橋本.TXT

早期教育の効果に関する調査(II)-親子の意識と学習状況の分析を中心に-


untitled


Adult Attachment Projective AAP PARS PARS PARS PARS Table

, 2001, 1, Japanese Journal of Interpersonal and Social Psychology, 2001, No. 1, ) Aron, Dutton, Aron, & Iverson Sprecher

:- Ofer Feldman,Feldman : -

九州大学学術情報リポジトリ Kyushu University Institutional Repository 看護師の勤務体制による睡眠実態についての調査 岩下, 智香九州大学医学部保健学科看護学専攻 出版情報 : 九州大学医学部保健学

Transcription:

Interpretation bias of nonverbal information in the interpersonal situation Kana Takashima*, Makoto Iwanaga**, Hidetoshi Seiwa** * Graduate School of Biosphere Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 724, Japan ** Faculty of Integrated Arts and Science, Hiroshima University, Higashi-Hiroshima 724, Japan Abstract: An interpretation bias in social anxiety, which socially anxious individuals regard ambiguous social situations as negative, is confirmed in many studies. Though the previous studies discussed mainly verbal information, non-verbal information is also an important measure to understand others' emotion. Therefore misinterpretation for non-verbal information may elicit various problems in interpersonal situations. The present study aimed to investigate whether interpretation bias occurred in also non-verbal information. Participants were 32 female undergraduate students, who were divided in to low social anxiety group(n=20) and high social anxiety group(n=18). Participants made speech about self-related theme and non-related one for 5 minutes. While she made a speech about one of themes, the interviewer who sat on the front of her acted ambiguous actions. Participants evaluated those actions after a speech. The results were as follows. Low social anxiety group paid attention to ambiguous actions more than high social anxiety group. High social anxiety group tended to attribute a cause of these actions to self regardless of themes of speech. These results showed that interpretation bias occurred in also non-verbal information. Keywords: autonomic nervous system, interpretation bias, nonverbal information, social anxiety

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51 Amin, N., Foa, E. B. and Coles, M. E. 1998 Negative interpretation bias in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 945-957. Byrne, A. and Eysenck, M. W. 1993 Individual differences in positive and negative interpretive biases. Personality and Individual Differences. 14, 849-851. Constans, J. I., Penn, D. L., and Ihen, G. H., Hope, D. A. 1999. Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, 643-651. Foa, E. B., Franklin, M. E., Perry, K. J., and Herbert, J. D. 1996 Cognitive biases in generalized social phobia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 254-267. Hadwin, J., Frost, S., French, C. C., and Richards, A. 1997 Cognitive processing and trait anxiety in typically developing children: Evidence for an interpretation bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 106, 486-490. Leary, M. R. 1981 Understanding social anxiety: social, personality, and clinical perspective. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publicasions. MacLeod, C. and Mathews, A. 1988 Anxiety and the allocation to threat. Quartarly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 659-670. Magnusdottir, I., and Smari, J. 1999 Social anxiety in adolescents and appraisal of negative events: specificity

52 or generality of bias?, Behaviour and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 27, 223-230. Mahrabian, A. 1981 Silent messages : implicit communication of emotions and attitudes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Mansell, W., Ehlers, A., Clark, D. M., Chen, Y. 2002 Attention to Positive and Negative Social-Evaluative Words: Investigating the Effects of Social Anxiety, Trait Anxiety and Social Threat. Anxiety Stress and Coping, Vol.15, No. 1, pp. 19-29. Martin J., A. and Penn, D., L.2001 Social cognition and subclinical paranoid ideation. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 40, 261-265. Roth, D., Anthony, M. M., and Swinson, R. P. 2001 Interpretation for anxiety symptoms in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 129-138. Russo, R. Patterson, N., Roberson, D., Stevenson, N., et al. 1996 Emotional value of information and its relevance in the interpretation of homophones in anxiety. Cognition-and-Emotion, 10, 213-220. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, Vol. 61, No. 2, 123-126. Stopa, L., and Clark, D. M. 2000 Social phobia and interpretation of social events Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38, 278-283. Wells, A., Clark, D. M. and Ahmad, S. 1998 How do I look with my minds eye: Perspective taking in social phobic imagery. Behaviour-Research-and-Therapy, 36, 631-634.