untitled

2010 58 1 39 59 c 2010 20 2009 11 30 2010 6 24 6 25 1 1953 12 2008 III 1. 5, 1961, 1970, 1975, 1982, 1992 12 2008 2008 226 0015 32

40 58 1 2010 III 2., 2009 3 #3.xx #3.1 #3.2 1 1953 2 1958 12 2008 1 2 2 1 1) 1 11 2003 #3.9 12 #3.1b 2 5 #3.1c 3 5 #3.3 1 #3.4 2 #3.5 2 12 #3.6 1 7 #3.7 1 5 #3.8 #3.8b 1 #3.8 #3.8b #3.1 2) #3.2 #3.2b 2 2 6 1978 #3.2 #3.1 7 1983 #3.2b #3.1

41 3. 3.1 #3.1 1 1 5 1973 6 1978 2 1958 1990 30, 1995, 2 1958 12 2008 20 10 30 16 30 40 12 2008 2 1958 47 3 1963 40 11 2003 41 34 42 38 36 37 30 31 12 2008 27 3) 30 1 1, 2005 5 1973 6 1978 1. #3.1

42 58 1 2010 1. #3.1 2 1958 12 2008 5 1973 5 4 1968 #2.5 #4.5 #7.1 #7.2 1979 6 1978 5 3.2 #3.2 2 2 1958 6 1978 #3.1 2 70 17 3 6 77 76 69 74

43 7 1978 #3.2b #3.1 #3.2 #3.2b #3.1 #3.2b #3.2 2 8 1988 6 #3.1 #3.2 7 #3.1 #3.1 #3.2b 3 2. #3.1 #3.2 #3.2b 3. #3.1&#3.2 #3.2b

44 58 1 2010 67 3 2 8 1988, 1995, #3.2 #3.2b, 2006 1970 4 20 9 1993 30 1990 4. 1987 1993, 1991;, 1995;, 1998 2002 2005, 2004a, 2004b, 2005a, 2005b, 2005c, 2005d, 2006a, 2007a 2005 2009, 2006b, 2007b, 2007c, 2008, 2009;, 2007;, 2008 #3.1 #3.2b # 2 4) 2002 24 1988 37 1988 8 31 7 7 6 5 3 3 1 2 2005 2006 World Value Survey, 2008 37 71 28 88 72

45 57 50 50 51 15 10 6 1978 7 1983 1 5 2 2 4 7 religious attitude religious mind 5. #3.5 #3.6 #3.9 #3.1 #3.2b 4 15 4 5.1 #3.5 2 1958 12 2008 1958 20 59 2008 38 33 12 23

46 58 1 2010 2. #3.1 3 2 1958 12 2008 2 1958 20 34 12 2008 70 13 36 3 65 32 2 1958 12 2008 2 1958 50 50 1945 30 2 #3.5 1973 5 NHK 16

47 3. #3.5 NHK, 2010 1970 10 2003 10 2008 15 1976 1978 10, 1979 2004, 2006 NHK NHK 2002 2005 2005 2009 18 45 26 12 2008 5) 5.2 #3.6 1 1953 7 1983 K 12 2008 M 1 1 8 7 27 #2.5

48 58 1 2010 4. #3.6 5 1973 #3.6 7 1983 4 18 9 6 6 5 2 3 5 7 #3.1 #3.2b #3.6 5.3 #3.9 12 2008 1 1953 11 2003 1 1953 6 1978 6 6 5 5 50 17 23 51 4 1968 5 1973 3 1964 6 1978 9 1993 3 6 9 6. 12 2008 III 2 2 4a, b

49 4a. 12 2008 III 1 1 2 65 34 64 65 12 2008 K #7.1 #7.2 #5.1

50 58 1 2010 4b. 12 2008 III 2 #5.1b #5.1c1 #5.1c2 #5.1d III #7.1 #7.2 1 7. 4 5

51 4 4 4 p ij q ij qij(1 q ij)/n j 2 p ij i j q ij i i 6) n j j 5 2.0 3.0 #4.11 #3.5 #8.7j #4.10 #2.7 7) #2.12c #2.4 #2.5 #2.10 #5.22 #7.24 1 #8.7j #1.3 #9.1 #2.5 #5.1 #5.1b #9.6 #2.12c #2.7 #4.5 #4.10 #2.1 #4.5 #2.7 #4.11 #2.12 #2.12c #3.5 #2.5 #4.16 #5.22 #2.10 #5.6 #7.36 #7.35 #5.1d #5.1c1 c2 #1.3 #1.91

52 58 1 2010 5. 12 2008

53 5. Hayashi and Suzuki, 1995;, 1998

54 58 1 2010 5. #4.11 3 #4.11 5 12 2008 67 3 33 21 1987 1993 2002 2005 2005 2009 1990 6, 2008; Hayashi and Nikaido, 2009 57 50 10 14 5 2006

55 8. 1980 1953 2008 2002 4 80 12 2008 20 30 2008

56 58 1 2010 1) 2 2) 2009 3) 4) 1987 1987 1987 1988 1988 1992 1993 2002-2003 2003 2003 2004 A B 2004 A B 2004 2005 2006 2006 2006 2007 2007 2008 5) 2004 6) q ij = k r ik s jk r ik i k s jk j k 7)

57 2008. 1979. U 21 32 96 100 1979. No. 44 1991. No. 71 1995. 43 1 27 80 2006. 33 1 13 24 2008. 36 69 70 Hayashi, F. and Nikaido, K. 2009. Religious faith and religious feelings in Japan Analyses of cross-cultural and longitudinal surveys, Behaviormetrika, 36 2, 167 180. Hayashi, F. and Suzuki, T. 1995. Data analytic representation of characteristics of various breakdowns on cross-cultural survey, Data Science and Its Applications eds. Y. Escoufier, C. Hayashi, etc., 235 246, Academic Press, Tokyo. 2005. 53 1 103 132 2009. 12 2008 No. 99 NHK 2010. NHK 1995. No. 76 2005. No. 1 1961. 1970. 2 1975. 3 1982. 4 1992. 5 1998. 2004a. 2002 No. 91 2004b. 2002 2005a. 2004 2005b. 2004 2005c. 2004 2005d. 2004 A 2006a. 14 17 A 2006b. 2005

58 58 1 2010 2007a. 2007b. 2006 2007c. 2006 USA 2008. 2007 2009. 2008 2007. 2006 2008. 2007

Proceedings of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics Vol. 58, No. 1, 39 59 (2010) 59 Contemporary Japanese Religious Mind Based on Survey Data from the Japanese National Character and Other Cross-national Surveys Fumi Hayashi Faculty of Human Sciences, Toyo Eiwa University This paper investigates contemporary Japanese attitudes toward religion by tracing changes in response patterns to questions relating to religion included in various installments of the Japanese National Character Surveys from 1953 to 2008. It also compares these findings to the results of a number of other international comparative surveys. A cohort analysis reveals that the increase in religiosity of the Japanese stems mainly from age effect. To visualize the relationship between religiosity and the importance of the religious mind in a broader sense in contemporary Japanese societies, the Quantification III method, incorporating nearly all questions included in the 12 th installment of the National Character Survey, was employed. This resulted in a 2-dimensional configuration that displays structural patterns in people s minds. Among other things, this effort demonstrated that while both religiosity and the importance of the religious mind are associated with positive attitudes toward society in general, a view holding that the religious mind is unimportant is associated with more negative attitudes toward society. Relationships between religiosity and the importance of the religious mind with other general social attitudes and orientations were also discussed, based on comparisons of results of these analyses after adjusting for differences in the distribution of respondents by age. Key words: Religious mind, religious faith, structure of Japanese attitudes, comparative social attitude surveys among seven nations, east Asia value surveys, the Asia & Pacific value surveys, quantification method III.